Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Compliance and Internal Control over Compliance
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Defense
Federal Program Name: Conservation and Rehabilitation of Natural Resources on Military Installations
Assistance Listing Number: 12.005
Federal Award Identification Number...
Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Compliance and Internal Control over Compliance
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Defense
Federal Program Name: Conservation and Rehabilitation of Natural Resources on Military Installations
Assistance Listing Number: 12.005
Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79TI083313 - 2020
Award Period: September 28, 2020, through September 27, 2025
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.320 requires non-federal entities to have and use documented procurement procedures. 2 CFR 200.318(i) states that "the non-Federal entity must maintain record sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price". In addition, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) states that "... If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity". Furthermore, 2 CFR 200.320(b) states that "When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section.".
Condition: During our testing, it was noted that the Organization was not performing suspension and debarment checks prior to entering into vendor contracts to ensure the vendor was not listed in the suspended or debarred database maintained by the General Services Administration. In addition, the Organization does not have an established procurement policy nor procedures in place at the time of the audit in compliance with Uniform Guidance.
Questioned costs: None.
Context: For procurement, a sample of 8 was made from a population of 30 procurement transactions charged to the major program that exceeded $3,000 (the Organization's procurement policy after 2023 and below the minimum micropurchase threshold before it was increased by the FAR to $10,000 for those with a written established policy). Of the 8 sampled procurement selections, three did not retain an adequate number of price comparisons prior to exercising the procurement, four did not follow the formal procurement methods for proposals when required, and all lacked evidence of controls over procurement considerations.
For suspension and debarment, a sample of 3 was made from a population of 3 (entire population) suspension and debarment transactions charged to the major program. Of the 3 sampled, all were not checked for suspension or debarment prior to entering into the transaction.
Cause: Prior to completing the prior year’s audit, staff were not aware of the specific compliance requirements and procedures for procurement, suspension, and debarment status.
Effect: Purchases may occur that do not follow the procurement, suspension and debarment standards as required by Uniform Guidance, and contracts to vendors that had been suspended or debarred could be awarded and not detected.
Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-002.
Recommendation: We recommend the Organization ensure its current process to review potential contractors for suspension and debarment is taking place prior to entering into transactions with such entities. The Organization has already taken steps to address considerations around procurement by implementing a Procurement Approval form. CLA recommends the use of this form, including signature, and emphasizes the importance of retaining adequate price rate quotations, RFP documentation, sole-source evidence, and price analyses in accordance with their established thresholds.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Action taken in response to finding: Previous corrective actions were completed in April 2024 upon receipt of our FY 2022 Audit from CLA. We believe these corrective actions would have captured most, if not all, of the findings if they were in place for the entire FY23 period. That said we have further reviewed and expanded our internal controls around procurement, suspension, and debarment, including the process for reviewing potential contractors for suspension and debarment. Specifically, we have added language in all agreement templates to ensure we are in accordance with Uniform Guidance. As noted, we have also added a procurement approval form and a standardized process for approval signature, quotes, sole source evidence and price analyses. As part of that effort, we have also updated threshold amounts for micro-purchase, small purchase, and procurement standards to be consistent with FAR and we are providing additional training to staff.
Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Gary Slater
Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 10/1/2024