Audit 323086

FY End
2023-12-31
Total Expended
$1.52M
Findings
2
Programs
3
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-09-30
Auditor: Warren Averett

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
500317 2023-001 Material Weakness - E
1076759 2023-001 Material Weakness - E

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.917 Hiv Care Formula Grants $1.32M Yes 1
93.940 Hiv Prevention Activities Health Department Based $186,000 - 0
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $13,155 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
VDPEAFGSDVF5 Kurt Goodman Auditee
8504297551 Kimy Sarra Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under theUniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal awards activity of Okaloosa AIDS Support and Informational Services, Inc., dba OASIS Florida (the Organization) under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to, and does not, present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of the Organization.
Title: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under theUniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: INDIRECT COST RATE Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under theUniform Guidance. The Organization has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Criteria- According to 2 CFR 200.303, non-federal entities receiving federal awards must establish and maintain internal controls that comply with the guidance in COSO’s "Internal Control Integrated Framework.” This regulation requires management to design control activities to achieve compliance objectives and respond to compliance risks. Additionally, specific program requirements mandate that eligibility determinations must be supported by adequate documentation. This includes verifying that individuals meet all eligibility criteria, such as proof of HIV diagnosis, income status and residency, before granting benefits. Condition-During the testing of eligibility, multiple issues were noted with proper approval and maintaining proper eligibility information within the client files. Specifically, three individuals lacked the proper support in their files to determine eligibility. Additionally, there were three applications that did not include proof of review prior to the notice of eligibility being granted. Cause - The primary cause of the errors identified was lack of administrative oversight and a lack of effective control activities such as effective review procedures and monitoring. Effect - The Organization granted notices of eligibility to individuals without the required supporting documentation and/or proper approval. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Context - Prior to a notice of eligibility (NOE) being granted, it must be verified that the individual has valid proof of HIV diagnosis, be considered low income, and be a resident of the state in which they are applying in. Eligibility documentation should be retained in the client file. Out of the sample of 40 client files tested, we noted three individuals who did not have all requirements within their file. Two individuals did not have proof of HIV, and one individual did not have valid proof of residency. OASIS Florida was able to obtain the proof of HIV from the health department for both individuals in question, but the individual without proof of valid residency was determined to not be a resident of Florida and incorrectly received an NOE. After an eligibility application is completed, it is given to a case manager for review. Prior to eligibility being granted, the case manager is supposed to sign that they have reviewed the eligibility application. Out of the sample of 40 files tested, three applications did not include proof of review prior to the notice of eligibility being granted. Recommendation - We recommend the client implement controls to ensure all eligibility documentation is obtained and properly reviewed before granting eligibility. This includes providing regular staff training and conducting periodic internal audits to ensure compliance. Views of Responsible Officials - We agree with the recommendation offered.
Criteria- According to 2 CFR 200.303, non-federal entities receiving federal awards must establish and maintain internal controls that comply with the guidance in COSO’s "Internal Control Integrated Framework.” This regulation requires management to design control activities to achieve compliance objectives and respond to compliance risks. Additionally, specific program requirements mandate that eligibility determinations must be supported by adequate documentation. This includes verifying that individuals meet all eligibility criteria, such as proof of HIV diagnosis, income status and residency, before granting benefits. Condition-During the testing of eligibility, multiple issues were noted with proper approval and maintaining proper eligibility information within the client files. Specifically, three individuals lacked the proper support in their files to determine eligibility. Additionally, there were three applications that did not include proof of review prior to the notice of eligibility being granted. Cause - The primary cause of the errors identified was lack of administrative oversight and a lack of effective control activities such as effective review procedures and monitoring. Effect - The Organization granted notices of eligibility to individuals without the required supporting documentation and/or proper approval. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Context - Prior to a notice of eligibility (NOE) being granted, it must be verified that the individual has valid proof of HIV diagnosis, be considered low income, and be a resident of the state in which they are applying in. Eligibility documentation should be retained in the client file. Out of the sample of 40 client files tested, we noted three individuals who did not have all requirements within their file. Two individuals did not have proof of HIV, and one individual did not have valid proof of residency. OASIS Florida was able to obtain the proof of HIV from the health department for both individuals in question, but the individual without proof of valid residency was determined to not be a resident of Florida and incorrectly received an NOE. After an eligibility application is completed, it is given to a case manager for review. Prior to eligibility being granted, the case manager is supposed to sign that they have reviewed the eligibility application. Out of the sample of 40 files tested, three applications did not include proof of review prior to the notice of eligibility being granted. Recommendation - We recommend the client implement controls to ensure all eligibility documentation is obtained and properly reviewed before granting eligibility. This includes providing regular staff training and conducting periodic internal audits to ensure compliance. Views of Responsible Officials - We agree with the recommendation offered.