Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
48,527
In database
Filtered Results
896
Matching current filters
Showing Page
6 of 36
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: § 200.403
Finding 2024-004 – Material Weakness, Material Noncompliance – Allowable Costs/Activities (Repeat) Name of Contact Person: George Czerwionka, Director of Finance Corrective Action: Management will improve policies and procedures to record the purchase of gift cards as a prepaid transactions and expe...
Finding 2024-004 – Material Weakness, Material Noncompliance – Allowable Costs/Activities (Repeat) Name of Contact Person: George Czerwionka, Director of Finance Corrective Action: Management will improve policies and procedures to record the purchase of gift cards as a prepaid transactions and expense the gift cards when all allowable cost criteria are met. We will also get input from our funders when necessary. Proposed Completion Date: May 31, 2025
View Audit 355781 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding: The Department of Children, Youth, and Families did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with financial reporting requirements for the Child Care and Development Fund Cluster. Questioned Costs: Assistance Listing # 93.575 93.575 COVID-19 93.596 Amount $0 Sta...
Finding: The Department of Children, Youth, and Families did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with financial reporting requirements for the Child Care and Development Fund Cluster. Questioned Costs: Assistance Listing # 93.575 93.575 COVID-19 93.596 Amount $0 Status: Corrective action in progress Corrective Action: The Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) program was previously managed by the Department of Social and Health Services and the Department of Early Learning. Since the program transitioned in 2019, the Department has been making efforts to strengthen internal controls over payments to child care providers and other CCDF grant requirements. The Department implemented grant-level management of all federal funds, including the CCDF grant. The Department allocated the CCDF grant to eligible clients and allowable activities in compliance with 45 CFR 98.67. As part of the audit resolution process, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Administration for Children & Families (ACF), which oversees the CCDF program at the federal level, reviews all the State Auditor’s Office (SAO) findings and issues management decision letters. The Department received a management decision letter dated October 3, 2023, from HHS for finding 2021-033 (2020-038) where ACF did not sustain the disallowance of questioned costs for prior findings and stated: “Although the Department’s internal controls were lacking, the ACF has not identified any funds that were expended on ineligible activities.” The ACF recommended: “…that the Department work with the auditors to determine an appropriate methodology that can be tested to ensure child care payments comply with Federal regulations.” The SAO has taken issue in the past several audits and maintained that the program is not auditable without child-level data. The Department is committed to collaborating with SAO to determine an appropriate methodology that identifies a sampling unit for accurately testing compliance. During the audit period, the Department did not have the staff and resources to develop and maintain the business process redesign, as well as the information technology initiatives necessary to meet the level of assurance as recommended by the SAO. In response to the auditor’s recommendations, the Department submitted a budget request for the 2024 supplemental budget. The enacted budget included funding to implement the Department’s budget request beginning in state fiscal year 2025, specifically: “Funding in this subsection must be expended with internal controls that provide child-level detail for all transactions, beginning July 1, 2024.” The Department is working with a developer to assist with building out the required databases between the Social Service Payment System and the Agency Financial Reporting System to allow transfers between funding sources to include child-level data related to the expenditures. The Department looks forward to working with SAO to resolve the child-level data concerns in the audit of the CCDF grant programs. The conditions noted in this finding were previously reported in findings 2023-062, 2022-044, and 2021-038. Completion Date: Estimated December 2025 Agency Contact: Stefanie Niemela Audit Liaison PO Box 40970 Olympia, WA 98504-0970 (360) 725-4402 stefanie.niemela@dcyf.wa.gov
Finding: The Department of Children, Youth, and Families did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with period of performance requirements for the Child Care and Development Fund Cluster. Questioned Costs: Assistance Listing # 93.575 93.575 COVID-19 93.596 Amount $0 S...
Finding: The Department of Children, Youth, and Families did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with period of performance requirements for the Child Care and Development Fund Cluster. Questioned Costs: Assistance Listing # 93.575 93.575 COVID-19 93.596 Amount $0 Status: Corrective action in progress Corrective Action: The Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) program was previously managed by the Department of Social and Health Services and the Department of Early Learning. Since the program transitioned in 2019, the Department has been making efforts to strengthen internal controls over payments to child care providers and other CCDF grant requirements. The Department implemented grant-level management of all federal funds, including the CCDF grant. The Department allocated the CCDF grant to eligible clients and allowable activities in compliance with 45 CFR 98.67. As part of the audit resolution process, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Administration for Children & Families (ACF), which oversees the CCDF program at the federal level, reviews all the State Auditor’s Office (SAO) findings and issues management decision letters. The Department received a management decision letter dated October 3, 2023, from HHS for finding 2021-033 (2020-038) where ACF did not sustain the disallowance of questioned costs for prior findings and stated: “Although the Department’s internal controls were lacking, the ACF has not identified any funds that were expended on ineligible activities.” The ACF recommended: “…that the Department work with the auditors to determine an appropriate methodology that can be tested to ensure child care payments comply with Federal regulations.” The SAO has taken issue in the past several audits and maintained that the program is not auditable without child-level data. The Department is committed to collaborating with SAO to determine an appropriate methodology that identifies a sampling unit for accurately testing compliance. During the audit period, the Department did not have the staff and resources to develop and maintain the business process redesign, as well as the information technology initiatives necessary to meet the level of assurance as recommended by the SAO. In response to the auditor’s recommendations, the Department submitted a budget request for the 2024 supplemental budget. The enacted budget included funding to implement the Department’s budget request beginning in state fiscal year 2025, specifically: “Funding in this subsection must be expended with internal controls that provide child-level detail for all transactions, beginning July 1, 2024.” The Department is working with a developer to assist with building out the required databases between the Social Service Payment System and the Agency Financial Reporting System to allow transfers between funding sources to include child-level data related to the expenditures. The Department looks forward to working with SAO to resolve the child-level data concerns in the audit of the CCDF grant programs. The conditions noted in this finding were previously reported in findings 2023-061, 2022-043, 2021-037, and 2020-041. Completion Date: Estimated December 2025 Agency Contact: Stefanie Niemela Audit Liaison PO Box 40970 Olympia, WA 98504-0970 (360) 725-4402 stefanie.niemela@dcyf.wa.gov
Finding: The Department of Children, Youth, and Families did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with matching, level of effort and earmarking requirements for the Child Care and Development Fund Cluster. Questioned Costs: Assistance Listing # 93.575 93.575 COVID-19 9...
Finding: The Department of Children, Youth, and Families did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with matching, level of effort and earmarking requirements for the Child Care and Development Fund Cluster. Questioned Costs: Assistance Listing # 93.575 93.575 COVID-19 93.596 Amount $0 Status: Corrective action in progress Corrective Action: The Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) program was previously managed by the Department of Social and Health Services and the Department of Early Learning. Since the program transitioned in 2019, the Department has been making efforts to strengthen internal controls over payments to child care providers and other CCDF grant requirements. The Department implemented grant-level management of all federal funds, including the CCDF grant. The Department allocated the CCDF grant to eligible clients and allowable activities in compliance with 45 CFR 98.67. As part of the audit resolution process, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Administration for Children & Families (ACF), which oversees the CCDF program at the federal level, reviews all the State Auditor’s Office (SAO) findings and issues management decision letters. The Department received a management decision letter dated October 3, 2023, from HHS for finding 2021-033 (2020-038) where ACF did not sustain the disallowance of questioned costs for prior findings and stated: “Although the Department’s internal controls were lacking, the ACF has not identified any funds that were expended on ineligible activities.” The ACF recommended: “…that the Department work with the auditors to determine an appropriate methodology that can be tested to ensure child care payments comply with Federal regulations.” The SAO has taken issue in the past several audits and maintained that the program is not auditable without child-level data. The Department is committed to collaborating with SAO to determine an appropriate methodology that identifies a sampling unit for accurately testing compliance. During the audit period, the Department did not have the staff and resources to develop and maintain the business process redesign, as well as the information technology initiatives necessary to meet the level of assurance as recommended by the SAO. In response to the auditor’s recommendations, the Department submitted a budget request for the 2024 supplemental budget. The enacted budget included funding to implement the Department’s budget request beginning in state fiscal year 2025, specifically: “Funding in this subsection must be expended with internal controls that provide child-level detail for all transactions, beginning July 1, 2024.” The Department is working with a developer to assist with building out the required databases between the Social Service Payment System and the Agency Financial Reporting System to allow transfers between funding sources to include child-level data related to the expenditures. The Department looks forward to working with SAO to resolve the child-level data concerns in the audit of the CCDF grant programs. The conditions noted in this finding were previously reported in findings 2023-060, 2022-042, 2021-036, and 2020-040. Completion Date: Estimated December 2025 Agency Contact: Stefanie Niemela Audit Liaison PO Box 40970 Olympia, WA 98504-0970 (360) 725-4402 stefanie.niemela@dcyf.wa.gov
Finding: The Department of Children, Youth, and Families did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with requirements to ensure payments to child care providers for the Child Care and Development Fund Cluster programs were allowable and properly supported. Questioned Costs: ...
Finding: The Department of Children, Youth, and Families did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with requirements to ensure payments to child care providers for the Child Care and Development Fund Cluster programs were allowable and properly supported. Questioned Costs: Assistance Listing # 93.575 93.575 COVID-19 93.596 Amount $415,579,473 Status: Corrective action in progress Corrective Action: The Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) program was previously managed by the Department of Social and Health Services and the Department of Early Learning. Since the program transitioned in 2019, the Department has been making efforts to strengthen internal controls over payments to child care providers and other CCDF grant requirements. The Department implemented grant-level management of all federal funds, including the CCDF grant. The Department allocated the CCDF grant to eligible clients and allowable activities in compliance with 45 CFR 98.67. As part of the audit resolution process, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Administration for Children & Families (ACF), which oversees the CCDF program at the federal level, reviews all the State Auditor’s Office (SAO) findings and issues management decision letters. The Department received a management decision letter dated October 3, 2023, from HHS for finding 2021-033 (2020-038) where ACF did not sustain the disallowance of questioned costs for prior findings and stated: “Although the Department’s internal controls were lacking, the ACF has not identified any funds that were expended on ineligible activities.” The ACF recommended: “…that the Department work with the auditors to determine an appropriate methodology that can be tested to ensure child care payments comply with Federal regulations.” The SAO has taken issue in the past several audits and maintained that the program is not auditable without child-level data. The Department is committed to collaborating with SAO to determine an appropriate methodology that identifies a sampling unit for accurately testing compliance. During the audit period, the Department did not have the staff and resources to develop and maintain the business process redesign, as well as the information technology initiatives necessary to meet the level of assurance as recommended by the SAO. In response to the auditor’s recommendations, the Department submitted a budget request for the 2024 supplemental budget. The enacted budget included funding to implement the Department’s budget request beginning in state fiscal year 2025, specifically: “Funding in this subsection must be expended with internal controls that provide child-level detail for all transactions, beginning July 1, 2024.” The Department is working with a developer to assist with building out the required databases between the Social Service Payment System and the Agency Financial Reporting System to allow transfers between funding sources to include child-level data related to the expenditures. The Department looks forward to working with SAO to resolve the child-level data concerns in the audit of the CCDF grant programs. The conditions noted in this finding were previously reported in findings 2023-058, 2022-041, 2021-033, 2020-038, 2019-035, 2018-034, 2017-024, 2016-021, 2015-023, 2014-023, 2013-016, 12-28, 11-23, 10-31, 9-12, and 8-13. Completion Date: Estimated December 2025 Agency Contact: Stefanie Niemela Audit Liaison PO Box 40970 Olympia, WA 98504-0970 (360) 725-4402 stefanie.niemela@dcyf.wa.gov
View Audit 355165 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding: The Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with federal activities allowed and subrecipient monitoring requirements for the Education Stabilization Fund program. Questioned Costs: Assistance Listing # 84.425R 84...
Finding: The Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with federal activities allowed and subrecipient monitoring requirements for the Education Stabilization Fund program. Questioned Costs: Assistance Listing # 84.425R 84.425V Amount $47,322,280 Status: Corrective action complete Corrective Action: The Office distributed the remaining unobligated funds from the program to Local Education Agencies (LEAs) through the apportionment process to meet the legislative intent. Due to the nature of how the payments were calculated, the Office’s grants system could not be used for the distribution. When a grant is awarded through our grants system, an email notification is sent to the organization that contains the federal elements required in 2 CFR 200.332. Although the Office concurs that we did not provide a formal subaward document that included all of the elements since the funds were not distributed through our grants system, the LEA’s received other formal communication through a Gov Delivery email and the School District Accounting Manual that included most of these federal elements. Going forward, if the Office uses the apportionment process to distribute funds to LEAs, all the required federal elements in 2 CFR 200.332 will be included in a separate subaward. The Office’s communication to LEAs also included the allowable use of these funds. Therefore, the Office does not concur that the funds should be questioned as not being allowable or properly supported. Completion Date: February 2025 Agency Contact: TJ Kelly Chief Financial Officer P.O. Box 47200 Olympia, WA 98504-7200 (360) 725-6301 Thomas.Kelly@k12.wa.us
View Audit 355165 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 558330 (2024-067)
Significant Deficiency 2024
The RIEMA Recovery staff will conduct an additional review of all projects prior to obligation including both small and large projects. This review will include not only that the state required documentation is included but will also review the FEMA final validation report submitted with the projec...
The RIEMA Recovery staff will conduct an additional review of all projects prior to obligation including both small and large projects. This review will include not only that the state required documentation is included but will also review the FEMA final validation report submitted with the project. We acknowledge the errors which were reported by the State audit review of project number 694201 for federal disaster declaration DR-4505-RI. The agency will contact the Office of Housing and Community Development of the finding and they will be required to reimburse FEMA the unallowable costs. Anticipated Completion Date: RIEMA is implementing this immediately for all project reviews. Contact Person: Lawrence Macedo, Recovery Branch Chief, Rhode Island Emergency Management Agency lawrence.macedo@ema.ri.gov
View Audit 355126 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 558266 (2024-052)
Significant Deficiency 2024
DHS has a policy for subrecipient monitoring, which includes documentation required to be submitted by a subrecipient. The documentation is based on assessing the risk of each subrecipient. There is no requirement in the Uniform Grant Guidance in regard to supporting documentation requirements. T...
DHS has a policy for subrecipient monitoring, which includes documentation required to be submitted by a subrecipient. The documentation is based on assessing the risk of each subrecipient. There is no requirement in the Uniform Grant Guidance in regard to supporting documentation requirements. The invoice needs to be certified by an authorized agent and the expense needs to have been reasonably incurred. DHS ensures compliance in numerous ways, including monthly programmatic meetings, site visits, review of single audits and past performance. Additionally, DHS contracts include a budget narrative and allows for DHS to require additional documentation for audit purposes. If requested, DHS would have been able to produce more documentation to satisfy the allowability of costs. Anticipated Completion Date: Not Applicable Contact Person: Ben Quattrucci, Associate Director Financial Contract Management, Department of Human Services benjamin.a.quattrucci@dhs.ri.gov
View Audit 355126 Questioned Costs: $1
2024-044a: Management agrees with this finding and will communicate the requirements for subrecipient monitoring and specifically the review of single audit reports to our agency partners for implementation. 2024-044b: Management agrees with this finding and will communicate the requirements for su...
2024-044a: Management agrees with this finding and will communicate the requirements for subrecipient monitoring and specifically the review of single audit reports to our agency partners for implementation. 2024-044b: Management agrees with this finding and will communicate the requirements for subrecipient monitoring and specifically the review of single audit reports to our agency partners for implementation. 2024-044c: Management agrees with this finding and will communicate the requirements for subrecipient monitoring; specifically, the documentation of expenses, and meeting notes. Anticipated Completion Date: Completed April 23, 2025 Contact Persons: Paul L. Dion, Director, Pandemic Recovery Office, Department of Administration paul.l.dion@doa.ri.gov Brianna Ruggiero, Chief of Staff, Pandemic Recovery Office, Department of Administration brianna.ruggiero@doa.ri.gov
View Audit 355126 Questioned Costs: $1
Federal Fund Source liquidation is monitored monthly via the Fund Source Reconciliation Report and the Provider Utilization Report. Requests to close purchase orders associated with expiring federal fund sources are submitted to OPC accordingly. The Federal Financial Reporting Group will now have th...
Federal Fund Source liquidation is monitored monthly via the Fund Source Reconciliation Report and the Provider Utilization Report. Requests to close purchase orders associated with expiring federal fund sources are submitted to OPC accordingly. The Federal Financial Reporting Group will now have the right to close purchase orders with federal fund sources to expedite this process. Also, the Provider Utilization Report has been updated with Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), Contract End Date Exceeds Period of Performance and Payments Exceed Period of Performance, that specifically address the period of performance as of December 2024.
View Audit 354902 Questioned Costs: $1
Georgia Tech management agrees that internal audit reports demonstrated departmental deficiencies in knowledge of policies and procedures that needed to be addressed. Upon disclosure of Internal Audit’s recommendations, the departments and central offices immediately responded with additional traini...
Georgia Tech management agrees that internal audit reports demonstrated departmental deficiencies in knowledge of policies and procedures that needed to be addressed. Upon disclosure of Internal Audit’s recommendations, the departments and central offices immediately responded with additional training, proactive compliance reviews, and re-enforcement of existing policies and procedures via Institute wide communications and enhanced reviews of support. New system controls regarding spend authorizations were put in place, with Georgia Tech’s Internal Audit department continuing to test these controls through the month of February. Central and departmental units within Georgia Tech will continue to work together to further enhance guidance and training to faculty and staff and to identify and test controls in our systems that will mitigate these issues.
1. Implement pre-approval controls; require date validation for all expenses against the award' s period of performance. Program Director or Executive Director or Accounting Director to review and approve. 2. Conduct training; educating staff on 2 CFR requirements and period-of-performance limitatio...
1. Implement pre-approval controls; require date validation for all expenses against the award' s period of performance. Program Director or Executive Director or Accounting Director to review and approve. 2. Conduct training; educating staff on 2 CFR requirements and period-of-performance limitations. 3. Perform periodic reviews; monitor compliance quarterly to detect outliers.
1. Implement pre-submission controls; require Date validation for all expenses against the award's period of performance. Program Director or Executive Director or Accounting Director to review and approve. 2. Conduct training; educating staff on 2 CFR requirements and period-of-performance limitati...
1. Implement pre-submission controls; require Date validation for all expenses against the award's period of performance. Program Director or Executive Director or Accounting Director to review and approve. 2. Conduct training; educating staff on 2 CFR requirements and period-of-performance limitations. 3. Perform periodic reviews; monitor compliance quarterly to detect outliers.
Corrective Action Plan for finding number 2024-001 Corrective action to be taken: The COVID-19 Emergency Rental Assistance program ceased accepting new applications on March 28, 2025. Prior to that a quality control process was in place to review applications before they were approved for payment ...
Corrective Action Plan for finding number 2024-001 Corrective action to be taken: The COVID-19 Emergency Rental Assistance program ceased accepting new applications on March 28, 2025. Prior to that a quality control process was in place to review applications before they were approved for payment to try to catch errors such as this. No further benefit payments will be issued as the program is being closed out. We have created a new internal review section that will focus on reviewing all potential issues identified. We have also engaged KPMG, LLP to audit any payments made that may be subject to recapture. Anticipated completion date All efforts are already under way and every attempt will be made to recapture any overpayments prior to monitoring (yet to be announced) by the U.S Department of the Treasury. Contact for the corrective action S. Kyleen Welling, Chief of Staff and Chief Operating Officer
View Audit 354055 Questioned Costs: $1
View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan We acknowledge the findings and appreciate the diligence of the audit team in identifying the discrepancies in our indirect cost calculations and reporting as outlined in the draft findings. The Veterans Integration Center (VIC) is committed t...
View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan We acknowledge the findings and appreciate the diligence of the audit team in identifying the discrepancies in our indirect cost calculations and reporting as outlined in the draft findings. The Veterans Integration Center (VIC) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of compliance with all federal regulations and grant requirements. Corrective Action Plan 1. Training and Guidelines: All relevant staff will undergo training to understand and implement the correct procedures for calculating indirect costs. Comprehensive guidelines will be developed and disseminated to ensure consistency across all calculations and reporting. 2. Completion of SF-425 Jointly: The COO, and VIC’s contracted Accountant will confirm the accurate Modified Total Direct Costs (MTDC) which is to be used in completing the SF-425, then prepare the GPD SF-425 jointly to ensure its accuracy. 3. Review and Approval Process: An additional layer of review and approval will be established for all indirect cost calculations before they are reported. This step will involve our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to ensure accuracy and compliance. Corrective Action Plan Timeline • Staff Training and Guidelines Distribution: Completed by Q4 2025 • Completion of SF-425 Jointly: Starting Q3 2025 with SF-425 revision • Review and Approval Process: Effective immediately, with CEO, reviews starting Q3 2025 Designation of Employee Position Responsible for Meeting Deadline The Chief Operating Officer (COO) will be responsible for the oversight and successful implementation of the corrective action plan. The COO will coordinate with the contracted internal Accountant to ensure all actions are taken within the stipulated timelines and report directly to the Chief Executive Officer on the progress.
View Audit 353588 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 554740 (2024-032)
Significant Deficiency 2024
2024-032 Department of Justice Ensure program expenditures are supported Management Response: The Oregon Department of Justice agrees with the finding and provides the following information regarding the cause of this error and corrective action planned for implementation by June 30, 2025, which wil...
2024-032 Department of Justice Ensure program expenditures are supported Management Response: The Oregon Department of Justice agrees with the finding and provides the following information regarding the cause of this error and corrective action planned for implementation by June 30, 2025, which will be implemented by the Interim Financial Services Manager Richard Rylander. This error was caused through a lack of secondary validation of expenditures which resulted in incorrect expenditures being entered into the system. The correction action plan will update the Secondary Review of Expenditures and Batch Entry Process to ensure that the secondary review identifies and prevents errors which caused the finding above. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2025 Contact person: Richard Rylander, Interim Financial Services Manager
View Audit 353343 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 554594 (2024-032)
Significant Deficiency 2024
2024-032 Department of Justice Ensure program expenditures are supported Management Response: The Oregon Department of Justice agrees with the finding and provides the following information regarding the cause of this error and corrective action planned for implementation by June 30, 2025, which wil...
2024-032 Department of Justice Ensure program expenditures are supported Management Response: The Oregon Department of Justice agrees with the finding and provides the following information regarding the cause of this error and corrective action planned for implementation by June 30, 2025, which will be implemented by the Interim Financial Services Manager Richard Rylander. This error was caused through a lack of secondary validation of expenditures which resulted in incorrect expenditures being entered into the system. The correction action plan will update the Secondary Review of Expenditures and Batch Entry Process to ensure that the secondary review identifies and prevents errors which caused the finding above. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2025 Contact person: Richard Rylander, Interim Financial Services Manager
View Audit 353285 Questioned Costs: $1
2024-002 – INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER COMPLIANCE – ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES Significant Deficiency Auditee’s Response and Planned Corrective Action FHA is retraining staff on procurement policy and reinforcing the requirement for pre-approval before payment. A checklist will be added to all invoi...
2024-002 – INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER COMPLIANCE – ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES Significant Deficiency Auditee’s Response and Planned Corrective Action FHA is retraining staff on procurement policy and reinforcing the requirement for pre-approval before payment. A checklist will be added to all invoices to confirm documentation is in place before submission for payment and a second signer will be responsible for signing invoices in the event of the absence of the Executive Director. Random monthly internal audits will be conducted to ensure continued compliance. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: Immediate Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Benjamin Anako, Fiscal Officer
Corrective action plan: Management is in the process of implementing a method for employees to charge their time to grants, as needed, from the payroll system. Personnel responsible for corrective action: Timothy Jodway, Interim Chief Financial Officer. Estimated corrective action completion date: M...
Corrective action plan: Management is in the process of implementing a method for employees to charge their time to grants, as needed, from the payroll system. Personnel responsible for corrective action: Timothy Jodway, Interim Chief Financial Officer. Estimated corrective action completion date: May 2025
View Audit 352776 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 2024-02: Indirect Costs (IDC) Views of Responsible Officials Management agrees with the finding and recommendations. Through the merger with Old Dominion University, additional controls have adopted around the processes and controls around the accuracy of the review over indirect costs calcu...
Finding 2024-02: Indirect Costs (IDC) Views of Responsible Officials Management agrees with the finding and recommendations. Through the merger with Old Dominion University, additional controls have adopted around the processes and controls around the accuracy of the review over indirect costs calculation requirements. Corrective Action Plan Effective July 1, 2024, EVMS merged with ODU and the ODU Research Foundation became the fiscal and administrative agent for EVMS’s transferring sponsored programs on behalf of ODU. As per ODU’s Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the ODU Research Foundation, the ODU Research Foundation has policies and processes in place to manage how the indirect costs are calculated. The ODU Research Foundation uses its own system of internal controls for IDC calculation with no reliance on ODU systems for those processes and are audited separately. As a corrective action moving forward, ODU management will notify the ODU Research Foundation management of the audit findings, so they are aware of the internal control deficiencies. ODU will request the Research Foundation to provide a copy of their single audit report to monitor continued compliance with Uniform Guidance. The corrective action plan will be completed by March 31, 2025 and the contact person for this finding is Victoria Dean.
View Audit 352191 Questioned Costs: $1
Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management response to finding 2024-004: Review over cost transfers of subrecipient expenditures Cluster Name: Research and Development Federal Awarding Agency: Various Award Name: Various Award Number: Various Award Years: Various Assistance Listing T...
Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management response to finding 2024-004: Review over cost transfers of subrecipient expenditures Cluster Name: Research and Development Federal Awarding Agency: Various Award Name: Various Award Number: Various Award Years: Various Assistance Listing Title: Various Assistance Listing Number: Various Pass-through entities: Various As described in Finding 2024-004, and as a result of improper training related to the implementation of the university’s new financial system in FY22, the university lacked adequate controls to identify the proper application of indirect costs as it relates to subrecipient expenses when using the cost transfer process to make corrections. Additionally, the university failed to properly apply its policy for the classification of subawards versus direct expenditures. As such, while cost transfers are a small percentage of overall transfer activity, an update to training materials will be made by June 2025 to educate cost transfer initiators on the proper method to use for this subset of subrecipient expenditures. Since February 2025, the Sponsor Projects Accounting (SPA) representative responsible for central office review of cost transfers now reviews to ensure that all intended grant related attributes are in effect before approving any subrecipient cost transfers. Additionally, as of February 2025, the university reinforced its policy regarding the classification of subawards versus direct expenditures with both the Procurement department and the SPA staff to ensure the proper expenditure classification is set up during the onboarding process of a contractor. The SPA team has completed its analysis and review of all previous subrecipient cost transfers to verify and correct the improper application of indirect cost limits and expenditure classifications. As of March 2025, all subrecipient cost transfer errors have been identified and corrected, resulting in questioned costs of approximately $587,000. Separately, this resulted in an under-recovery of $306,000 of indirect costs that were not charged to the original award. As all awards impacted are still open and active, the correcting expenditure adjustments were applied to the awards impacted that will affect future draw downs. Contact Person: Cindy Lee, Director, Sponsored Projects Accounting, cmlee@usc.edu
Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management response to finding 2024-003: Unallowable costs – Cost transfers based on budgeted amounts Cluster Name: Research and Development Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Award Name: Leveraging natural phenotypic vari...
Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management response to finding 2024-003: Unallowable costs – Cost transfers based on budgeted amounts Cluster Name: Research and Development Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Award Name: Leveraging natural phenotypic variations of heterogenous ALS populations-in-a-dish to enable scalable drug discovery Award Number: 5R01NS131409-03 Award Years: 2022-2025 Assistance Listing Title: Extramural Research Programs in the Neurosciences and Neurological Disorders Assistance Listing Number: 93.853 Pass-through entities: Not applicable As described in finding 2024-003, the university inadvertently processed a cost transfer moving expenses from one grant to another based on budgeted figures instead of actual expenses incurred. This resulted in an amount transferred that was greater than the actual costs incurred. The administrator in question has been identified and further review of this administrator’s work has been performed to determine if additional instances occurred. Upon review of the administrator’s work, it was determined that no additional corrections were required as no other instances of this nature were identified outside of the total questioned costs. As part of the department’s efforts to minimize further cost transfer errors, training was provided to all their grant administrators beginning November 1, 2024. This training will now be held annually to ensure the department responsible for administering the award is current on the University’s existing compliance policies. Furthermore, to support accuracy and transparency, the department will allocate separate time commitments during weekly administration meetings to review any required cost transfers. This time will be dedicated to ensuring proper documentation is in place, confirming the appropriateness of the transfer, and ensuring full compliance of the transaction(s). This updated review process involves representatives from Grant Administration, Keck School of Medicine Finance Office, and Purchasing, to ensure a full comprehensive review of each transfer. As such, beginning November 2024, a cost transfer will not move forward until it has been reviewed by the group. Contact Person: Andres Chan, Director, FBS Financial Analysis, andres.chan@usc.edu
View Audit 352166 Questioned Costs: $1
The Board has developed procedures to ensure that all purchase orders are approved before orders are placed, all expenditures are properly authorized by the respective program director and supporting documentation is adequately maintained. The Board is using a requisition form in Droplet to achieve ...
The Board has developed procedures to ensure that all purchase orders are approved before orders are placed, all expenditures are properly authorized by the respective program director and supporting documentation is adequately maintained. The Board is using a requisition form in Droplet to achieve this goal. All employees authorized to make or approve purchases have been trained on purchasing procedures outlined in the Purchasing Policies and Procedures Manual for Local Educational Agencies in the State of West Virginia by the WVDE Office of School Finance on 2/23/2024.
View Audit 352084 Questioned Costs: $1
Condition: During audit procedures, it was noted total reimbursements received exceeded expenditures. The Organization has charged costs to the program and received reimbursement; however, the products cost charged to the program had not been received prior to June 30, 2024. Corrective Actions: Goi...
Condition: During audit procedures, it was noted total reimbursements received exceeded expenditures. The Organization has charged costs to the program and received reimbursement; however, the products cost charged to the program had not been received prior to June 30, 2024. Corrective Actions: Going forward, the Organization will review all vouchers being charged to the program to make sure costs have been incurred before being charged to the program. Employee Responsible for Corrective Action: Michelle Clarke Completion Date: March 31, 2025
View Audit 351890 Questioned Costs: $1
NCHE implemented a new policy in January 2025 regarding missing receipts. In January 2024, a new policy was instituted requiring receipt of vendor invoice before payment approval by the Accountant and Executive Director. All copies of approvals, receipts, and invoices, are now attached to each expen...
NCHE implemented a new policy in January 2025 regarding missing receipts. In January 2024, a new policy was instituted requiring receipt of vendor invoice before payment approval by the Accountant and Executive Director. All copies of approvals, receipts, and invoices, are now attached to each expense transaction in QuickBooks Online. In January 2025, NCHE required email documentation for any missing receipts, sent to the accountant for inclusion in QBO.
« 1 4 5 7 8 36 »