Corrective Action Plans

Finding 2024-003: Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Responsible Official’s Response and Corrective Action Plan We concur with the finding. The Foundation has an informal process of reviewing vendors and determining if they have been suspended or debarred. However, there is not a formal process where proper documentation such as screenshots of the search are saved. Due to the transition in the accounting department, we were not aware of these specific criteria at the time. We were notified of these requirements after the end of fiscal year 2024. To address these issues, a comprehensive process was implemented during fiscal year 2025 to ensure proper documentation and compliance with procurement regulations. This process will include: 1. Ensuring that all sole source vendor selections are properly documented and justified. 2. Verifying and maintaining records that confirm vendors are not debarred or suspended from doing business with the Federal Government before entering into contractual agreements. We are committed to improving our procedures and ensuring compliance with all applicable regulations moving forward. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action Plan June 2025 Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan Natésha Johnson, Director of Finance and Administration Dr. Felecia Nave, President and Chief Executive Officer Luwanda Jenkins, Vice President of Partnerships and External Relation

Finding 2024-005 – Inadequate Procurement Documentation (Material Weakness) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Federal Program Name: Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants Assistance Listing Numbers: 66.460 Pass-Through Entity: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Program Name: Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 11.438, 15.015, 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: State of Oregon – Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.665 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Natural Resources Conservation Service Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.905 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Wildlife, Sport Fish and Restoration Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the InteriorFederal Program Name: Secure Rural Schools and community Self-Determination – Watershed and water-quality improvements Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.234 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Criteria: Federal procurement standards require non-Federal entities to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and basis for the contract price. Competitive procurement must follow the entity’s written procedures consistent with 2 CFR §§200.317-200.327, including:  Written procedures for procurement (§200.318(a)).  Full and open competition requirements (§200.319).  Methods of procurement (sealed bids, proposal requirements, and required documentation (§200.320).  Contract cost and price justification, (§200.324).  Suspension/debarment verification for covered transactions (§200.214; §200.213). Condition: During the audit period, the Entity did not retain sufficient procurement documentation for several contracts funded under the above Assistance Listings. Specifically, files lacked one or more of the following:  Evidence of the procurement method used.  Price or cost analysis.  Suspension/debarment checks for vendors where required.  Documentation of competition.  Conflict-of-interest attestations. Cause: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers procurement procedures were not sufficiently detailed or consistently applied to federal purchases. No evidence of procedures or review for procurement or suspension / debarment was provided to auditors. Turnover and limited training on Uniform Guidance procurement standards contributed to the inconsistent file completeness. Effect or Potential Effect: Without complete procurement documentation, the Entity cannot demonstrate compliance with federal procurement requirements, increasing the risk of:  Noncompetitive awards or unreasonable prices.  Unallowable costs for the award requirements.  Potential disallowance or repayment of federal funds.  Findings in federal or pass-through monitoring and future audits. Questioned Cost: Yes, $902,496 related to expenditures that had no procurement support or detail. Context: During our audit, it was found that the Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers had experienced complete staff turnover in Financial Management for the year being audited. No current finance employees had worked for the organization during the year being audited. Award files provided to auditors did not contain information related to procurement, suspension or debarment procedures or processes. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No, Prior- year did not require a Single Audit. Recommendation: We recommend that Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers: Update Written Procurement Procedures o Incorporate Uniform Guidance thresholds and methods (§200.320), competition requirements (§200.319), and documentation expectations (history of procurement). o Embed steps for suspension / debarment checks and Appendix II Contract clauses.  Standardized Procurement Checklist o Pre-award checklist that verifies: method, competition evidence, cost/price analysis, conflict of interest attestations, SAM exclusion check, and required federal clauses. o Post -award checklist ensuring complete contract file (award memo, bid tab / evaluation, signed agreement, clause verification).  Cost/Price Analysis Guidance o Require documented price reasonableness for small purchases, formal cost or price analysis for larger or sole-source awards, per (§200.324).  Training & Accountability o Provide targeted training to procurement and program staff on 2 CFR §§200.317- 20.327 and Assistance Listing award conditions. o Implement supervisory pre-award review and periodic file audits. District Response: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers acknowledges the deficiencies. Corrective Action Plan: ____________ (To be completed by Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers) Planned Implementation Date: _____________ Responsible Person: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers Finance Manager

Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners: These procurement issues originated during the prior County Clerk’s administration, but the current leadership is focused on corrective measures. Together, we are: • developing a SOP to ensure vendor checks for suspension and debarment are conducted on all purchases over $25,000, • establishing written standards of conduct to address conflicts of interest and set clear procurement guidelines, • and enhancing oversight and review to ensure all procurement processes are fully compliant with federal regulations. Our goal is to build a consistent, transparent procurement framework that safeguards both compliance and public trust. County Clerk: I was not the County Clerk in Office at this time. To correct this issue, the County plans to develop a SOP to timely and accurately track and report on the SEFA. The SOP will be reviewed, adopted, and monitored by the Board of County Commissioners.

FINDING 2024-002 – PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES-AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN (ARP) ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL EMERGENCY RELIEF FUND (ESSER III) - ALN 84.425U-CONDITION: During my review of the District’s compliance with the requirements for noncompetitive procurement, I noted the District did not document its rationale for purchases made from ‘Associates in Counseling’. This is a repeat finding 2023-002 from the prior fiscal year.-CRITERIA: In accordance with Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records include but are not limited to the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore, Section 2 CFR 200.320(c’) of the Uniform Guidance details five (5) circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used.-RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that for all future purchases involving noncompetitive procurement, that the District adhere to the requirements of 1) the District’s Procurement Policy for Federal Programs (#626), and 2) Section 2 CFR 200.320(c) of the Uniform Guidance.-MANAGEMENT’S PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION: For noncompetitive procurement, the District will maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include but are not limited to the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. The District’s timeframe for implementation is effective immediately.-District Officials Responsible for the Implementation of the Corrective Action Plan:-Aubrie Schnelle, Superintendent, and Austin Blauser, Business Manager

FINDING 2024-010 Finding Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Susie Swango, Director of Special Education Contact Phone Number and Email Address: swangos@nlcs.k12.in.us (812) 277-3220 ext. 16243 Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: Procurement - Small Purchases The school corporation will follow all Federal Requirements for small purchase procedures including obtaining price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources. We will document the procurement method we are using and attach supporting documentation for rate and price quotes by source. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, the school corporation will verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. All purchases $25,000 or greater will involve the following process - (1) checking SAM.gov to see if there are any exclusions, (2) require Vendor supply certification that they have not been suspended or debarred OR clause will be added to agreement or contract signed by Vendor as certification. Anticipated Completion Date: December 1, 2025

Federal Agency: US Department of Agriculture , US Department of Education Federal Program Name: Extension Services at 1890 Colleges Assistance Listing No.: 10.512 and 84.425 Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procurement policy to ensure it meets federal regulations and ensure they retain documentation of quotes received and final approval forms. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: KSU is revising its procurement policies to ensure compliance with uniform guidance requirements. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Eileen Butts, Director of Purchasing Planned completion date for corrective action plan: March 31, 2026

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.561 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 242MN101S2514 – 2024 Passed Through Entity: Minnesota Department of Human Services Pass Through Number: H55240010 Award Period: 2024 Recommendation: We recommend the County follow their federal purchasing policy in all their federal programs and retain documentation of that process occurring. As necessary, the County may need to add internal controls that are specific to each program to ensure this properly occurs. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: The County will continue to work with program managers to understand and adhere to federal purchasing policies. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Dana DeMaster, Director of Employment & Economic Assistance Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2025

Views of Auditee and Corrective Actions: GDOE disagrees with the finding. GDOE does allow for vendors to provide quotes for brand name or equal products. In this case, the substitute product offered was not equal to the product GDOE was soliciting. The end user provided justification that the substitute product did not meet the needs or specifications requested.

Finding Title: Noncompliance with Procurement Standards – Professional Services Responsible Person: Grace Kim, CFO Corrective Action Plan: The Foundation acknowledges the auditor’s finding that procurement standards were not followed when the attorney for this project was hired. Management did not anticipate the need to apply procurement requirements to legal services at the time of engagement. Management recognizes the importance of procurement regulations as a core internal control responsibility and will implement the following corrective actions: The organization will formalize and strengthen its procurement procedures to ensure compliance with applicable requirements. Specifically: 1. A written procurement policy will be developed and adopted that clearly defines competitive quote and documentation requirements for all goods and services, including professional services such as legal counsel. 2. The policy will specify thresholds requiring multiple price quotes or justification for sole-source procurement. 3. Management will require documentation on price comparisons or written justification prior to executing contracts or engagement letters for professional services. 4. Staff involved in procurement and contract approvals will be trained on the new procurement policy and compliance requirements. Anticipated Completion Date: January 1, 2026

Response/Corrective Action Plan: We concur with the finding and will revise the procurement policy as well as the internal control policies and procedures specific to the County to be in alignment with the Uniform Guidance requirements. Upon completion, the new policy will be provided to all department heads to ensure proper compliance in the utilization and disbursement of federal funds.

Views of Responsible Officials: CIF grew substantially in FY 24 following execution of the Federal award. This finding reflects the learning phase as CIF came into compliance with the Uniform Guidance. This FY 24 Program Audit immediately preceded the FY 25 Single Audit in fall 2025. Given this timing, the earliest possible implementation of corrective action is in FY 26. Beginning in FY 26, CIF implemented a corrective action involving updates to the CIF Procurement Policies & Procedures. This policy, which includes a Conflict of Interest section, was updated to reflect a decrease of the micro-purchase threshold from $50,000 to $10,000, clarifies that the SAM.gov check for suspension and debarment will occur prior to contract execution with the contractor, and the SAM.gov check will be documented with the date it was conducted. The updated CIF Procurement Policies & Procedures will be approved by the Board of Directors.

Prospectively, Historic South will review best practices related to the contract awarding process and formal contracting arrangements for construction work. In addition, Historic South will implement policies of: 1. Requiring the solicitation of multiple bids for all construction work in excess of $10,000 2. Establishing criteria for awarding all construction work 3. Implementing formal contracting processes for all construction work

Response to finding 2024-002 – Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Views of Responsible Officials: CSforALL management agrees with the conditions identified by SAX Advisory Group, including the noted causes and resulting effects under 2024-002. Due to the organizational pause at the end of 2024 and the transition period throughout 2025, this finding continued into the 2024 audit period. The Organization operated with significantly reduced staffing and limited capacity, which delayed the development of procurement policies addressing suspension and debarment requirements. Initial governance updates occurred during the 2025 Q4 Board meeting, where the Board approved a revised version of the By-Laws focused on correcting deficiencies in board structure and conflict-of-interest provisions. Procurement procedures recommended in this finding were not included in that initial revision but are scheduled for development and implementation as part of the 2026 rebuilding phase. Corrective Action taken in 2025: While no procurement-specific corrective action has yet been implemented, foundational updates to the By-Laws were approved at the 2025 Q4 Board meeting to address structural governance issues. These updates establish the basis for incorporating required procurement, suspension, and debarment procedures. The Operations Manager and Advisory Consultant have begun drafting updated procurement policies to ensure compliance with federal requirements. Corrective Action Planned for 2026: Draft procurement, suspension, and debarment policies will be completed and presented to the Board as a formal resolution in early 2026. Upon approval, these policies will be incorporated into the By-Laws and will take immediate effect. The Board has also approved the planned hiring of a consultant with Executive Director and strategy experience in 2026 to support policy implementation, training, staff alignment, and ongoing compliance review. These measures will ensure full compliance with procurement requirements throughout the 2026 operating year and beyond.

The Village will adopt all necessary policies.

Finding: Material weakness in internal control over procurement policies Questioned costs: ALN 81:113 ($31,120) ALN 19.901 ($15,000) Corrective action: While PFI accepts the finding and the rationale for identifying questioned costs based on Uniformed Guidance (UG) requirements for documentation regarding competitive bidding and contract types, it believes there is adequate documentation to justify incurred costs. PFI will update its procurement policy guidelines to reflect current UG requirements to include acquisition thresholds and competitive bidding procedures. Completion Date: February 1, 2026 Responsible Individual: Executive Director

The District’s Business Manager will obtain quotes/bids when necessary.

FA 2024-001 Improve Controls over Procurement Compliance Requirement: Internal Control Impact: Compliance Impact: Federal Awarding Agency: Pass-Through Entity: AL Numbers and Titles: Federal Award Numbers: Questioned Costs: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Material Weakness Material Noncompliance U.S. Department of Agriculture Georgia Department of Education 10.553 - School Breakfast Program 10.555 - National School Lunch Program COVID-19 - 10.555 - National School Lunch Program 10.582 - Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program 245GA324N1199 (Year: 2024) 245GA324L1603 (Year: 2024) 245GA324l1603 (Year: 2024) $5,380.74 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster revealed that the School District's internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that the School District's procurement procedures were followed. Corrective Action Plans: Implement a standardized procurement checklist that must be completed. Procurements will require two levels of review (program level review by child nutrition staff and District level) to confirm compliance before processing payments. District will provide staff training to ensure federal procurement regulations, district procurement policies along with documentation and recordkeeping requirements are being met. The finance department will conduct quarterly internal reviews of Child Nutrition expenditures to verify compliance. Estimated Completion Date: November 10, 2025 Contact Person: Jon Erik Jones, Superintendent Telephone: 229.321-1487 Email:jones@quitman.ki2.ga.us

CHA currently has a general procurement plan in place to guide its purchasing and contracting activities. However, to ensure full compliance with federal regulations, CHA will be updating its existing procurement policy to align with the Uniform Guidance requirements. This update will formalize procedures related to vendor selection, competitive bidding, and documentation to maintain transparency, accountability, and consistency across all procurement processes.

Management accepts the recommendation and will ensure compliance with the procurement standards in 2 CFR §§ 200.318–200.327 for all federally funded purchases by either conducting a competitive bidding process or documenting and obtaining approval for a sole source procurement as allowed under 2CFR §200.320(c)

Internal Controls over Compliance and Compliance with Procurement Standards Individual Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Christopher Holleman, Interim CFO Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2025 Corrective Action Plan: Management will ensure that the policy be redistributed for retraining purposes underscoring the vital importance of following the policy and federal guidelines related to procurements. In addition, the CFO will take lead to ensure that the procurement policy is appropriately applied, and documentation meets required standards.

Recommendation: We recommend the County review and update procurement policies for the entire County to ensure it meets the minimum requirements of 2 CFR 200 for all federal grants and establish a procurement process in order to ensure this policy is followed which includes adding language over suspension and debarment. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The County is working on reviewing policies and procedures and updating as necessary. Further, training will be available to all those involved in grants. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Jason Jerome Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2025

The Village will ensure that proposals be submitted for architectural and engineering professional services, and that documentation will be maintained for the proposals obtained as well as the Village’s determination of the most qualified vendor.

Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the auditor’s findings and recommendations. Below $50k there will also be formal procedures with increasingly more oversight for purchases as they increase in cost. We will form and document a detailed procedure for issuing RFPs for PO amounts over $50k. We will review at least 3 proposals and once one is chosen, the vendor will be vetted before the proposal is accepted.

Management Response We accept the recommendations and have acted as follows: Training: Provided mandatory Uniform Guidance and grant-compliance training for all program and finance staff. Post-Award Grant Management System: Implemented an integrated post-award grant management system that includes a built-in reporting calendar with automated deadline notifications to ensure timely and accurate submissions. Personnel: Grants Administrator started in March 2025, and a dedicated Grants Compliance Officer to oversee all federal program requirements, is actively being recruited by the end of 2025. These measures will ensure ongoing compliance with OMB Uniform Guidance. Estimated Completion Date January 1, 2026 Responsible Party Kathy De Palma, Grants Coordinator

FINDING 2024-001 Finding Subject: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: K. Rochelle Seneff Contact Phone Number and Email Address: (812)649-2242 ct@rockportin.gov Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: Procurement As Clerk-Treasurer, I will educate all parties involved on the requirements that were found to be unfulfilled through this Federal Audit. For the duration of any federally funded projects, a discussion will be held during a public board meeting, detailing the rationale behind the City's decision to work with the vendors selected for small purchases and simplified acquisitions. This will be done to verify that all vendors, even when bids are not required, were retained through appropriate methods. A procurement policy that outlines the City's procedures and conforms to applicable federal, state, and local laws will be developed and taken to the Common Council for approval. Suspension and Debarment All vendors who participate in the project will receive a Suspension and Debarment Certificate provided by the City that must be signed by a representative of the vendor and filed with the vendor's contract or in the project folder. Anticipated Completion Date: December 23, 2025