Audit 353769

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$1.22M
Findings
4
Programs
1
Organization: Movement Strategy Center (CA)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-04-15
Auditor: Armanino LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
555167 2024-001 Material Weakness - A
555168 2024-002 Material Weakness - I
1131609 2024-001 Material Weakness - A
1131610 2024-002 Material Weakness - I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $1.22M Yes 2

Contacts

Name Title Type
JBQ2RRA95TJ9 Carla Dartis Auditee
5104440640 Renee Ordeneaux Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: BASIS OF PRESENTATION The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the "Schedule") includes the federal award activity of Movement Strategy Center (the "Organization") under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Organization. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or limited as to reimbursement. Passthrough entity identifying numbers are presented where available and applicable. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected to use the 10% de minimis interest cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Some funding sources cap indirect cost rate reimbursements below this rate. 31

Finding Details

According to 2 CFR 200.430(i), charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Specifically: - Employees who work 100% on a single federal award must have certifications stating that all time was dedicated to the grant, signed by the employee or a supervisor with firsthand knowledge, prepared at least semi-annually. - Employees whose time is split among multiple activities must maintain time and effort reports reflecting actual hours worked in a manner consistent with 2 CFR 200.430(g)(vi). - All compensation costs charged to federal awards must be supported by appropriate documentation that complies with the federal cost principles.During the year ended June 30, 2024, we noted the following: - Employees who charged 100% of their time to the grant lacked required certifications or timecards documenting that their time was spent exclusively on grant-related activities. - In several instances, no timecards were available. - In other cases, available timecards showed no evidence of review or approval. - Employees who allocated only a portion of their time to the grant tracked hours worked on the grant, multiplied by their hourly rate, rather than maintaining records in compliance with 2 CFR 200.430(g)(vi), which requires a system of records that accurately reflects actual work performed. - Certain compensation costs totaling $50,000 were charged to the grant without any supporting documentation. These amounts represent questioned costs.
Under 2 CFR 200.318-326, non-federal entities must adhere to procurement standards for purchases made with federal funds. Key requirements include: - Full and Open Competition: Procurement transactions must be conducted to ensure open competition and prevent practices that may unduly restrict competition (2 CFR 200.319(a)). - Documentation of Procurement History: Entities must maintain records that detail the procurement history, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price (2 CFR 200.318(i)). - Use of Non-Competitive Procurement: Non-competitive procurement is only allowed under limited circumstances, such as when the item is available from a single source, there is a public emergency, or after solicitation of multiple sources, competition is deemed inadequate (2 CFR 200.320(c)).The Organization incurred expenditures of approximately $620,000 for the renovation of a community center using federal funds under the SLFRF program. The Organization received two bids for the renovation project. However, full documentation of the process was not maintained. Cause: The Organization did not establish or follow sufficient internal controls to ensure compliance with federal procurement requirements, including maintaining the required documentation for procurement activities. Possible effect: The lack of procurement documentation creates a significant risk that noncompliant practices occurred, such as non-competitive procurement or payments exceeding fair market value.
According to 2 CFR 200.430(i), charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Specifically: - Employees who work 100% on a single federal award must have certifications stating that all time was dedicated to the grant, signed by the employee or a supervisor with firsthand knowledge, prepared at least semi-annually. - Employees whose time is split among multiple activities must maintain time and effort reports reflecting actual hours worked in a manner consistent with 2 CFR 200.430(g)(vi). - All compensation costs charged to federal awards must be supported by appropriate documentation that complies with the federal cost principles.During the year ended June 30, 2024, we noted the following: - Employees who charged 100% of their time to the grant lacked required certifications or timecards documenting that their time was spent exclusively on grant-related activities. - In several instances, no timecards were available. - In other cases, available timecards showed no evidence of review or approval. - Employees who allocated only a portion of their time to the grant tracked hours worked on the grant, multiplied by their hourly rate, rather than maintaining records in compliance with 2 CFR 200.430(g)(vi), which requires a system of records that accurately reflects actual work performed. - Certain compensation costs totaling $50,000 were charged to the grant without any supporting documentation. These amounts represent questioned costs.
Under 2 CFR 200.318-326, non-federal entities must adhere to procurement standards for purchases made with federal funds. Key requirements include: - Full and Open Competition: Procurement transactions must be conducted to ensure open competition and prevent practices that may unduly restrict competition (2 CFR 200.319(a)). - Documentation of Procurement History: Entities must maintain records that detail the procurement history, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price (2 CFR 200.318(i)). - Use of Non-Competitive Procurement: Non-competitive procurement is only allowed under limited circumstances, such as when the item is available from a single source, there is a public emergency, or after solicitation of multiple sources, competition is deemed inadequate (2 CFR 200.320(c)).The Organization incurred expenditures of approximately $620,000 for the renovation of a community center using federal funds under the SLFRF program. The Organization received two bids for the renovation project. However, full documentation of the process was not maintained. Cause: The Organization did not establish or follow sufficient internal controls to ensure compliance with federal procurement requirements, including maintaining the required documentation for procurement activities. Possible effect: The lack of procurement documentation creates a significant risk that noncompliant practices occurred, such as non-competitive procurement or payments exceeding fair market value.