Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name 21.027, U.S. Department of the Treasury, COVID 19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, and 93.493, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Congressional Directives
Federal Award Identification Number and Year 21.027 192908 and 93.493 6 CE2CS52794 01 07
Pass through Entity 21.027 Chicago Department of Public Health; 93.493 N/A
Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations
Repeat Finding No
Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.
Per 2 CFR 200.319(a) All procurement transactions under the federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition and is consistent with the standards of this section and § 200.320(b) covering formal procurement methods.
Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals.
Finally, per 2 CFR 180.300, nonfederal entities must verify that outside parties are not suspended or debarred from engaging in federal activity before entering into a covered transaction.
Condition Controls were not sufficient to ensure procurement activities were performed in accordance with 2 CFR 200 and management’s internal policies and procedures related to procurement, suspension, and debarment.
Questioned Costs $ 237,890
If Questioned Costs are not Determinable, Description of why Known Questioned Costs Were Undetermined or Otherwise Could not be Reported N/A
Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed Questioned costs represent expenditures under these contracts reported on the SEFA.
Context For three contracts in excess of the Organization's formal procurement threshold ($50,000), management did not retain documentation of having obtained the required number of competitive bids or document rationale for sole procurement, did not document the history of procurement decisions, and was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction.
Cause and Effect A lack of controls to ensure required procurement activities were performed could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards.
Recommendation We recommend that management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with federal procurement standards. Additionally, we recommend management review its internal procurement policy regularly to ensure compliance with federal procurement standards under 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327.
Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Careful consideration was done in selecting the vendors to look at obtaining the best cost for the value of the service as IWS was responsible for a portion of the expenses. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement processes and controls in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name 21.027, U.S. Department of the Treasury, COVID 19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, and 93.493, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Congressional Directives
Federal Award Identification Number and Year 21.027 192908 and 93.493 6 CE2CS52794 01 07
Pass through Entity 21.027 Chicago Department of Public Health; 93.493 N/A
Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations
Repeat Finding No
Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.
Per 2 CFR 200.319(a) All procurement transactions under the federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition and is consistent with the standards of this section and § 200.320(b) covering formal procurement methods.
Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals.
Finally, per 2 CFR 180.300, nonfederal entities must verify that outside parties are not suspended or debarred from engaging in federal activity before entering into a covered transaction.
Condition Controls were not sufficient to ensure procurement activities were performed in accordance with 2 CFR 200 and management’s internal policies and procedures related to procurement, suspension, and debarment.
Questioned Costs $ 237,890
If Questioned Costs are not Determinable, Description of why Known Questioned Costs Were Undetermined or Otherwise Could not be Reported N/A
Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed Questioned costs represent expenditures under these contracts reported on the SEFA.
Context For three contracts in excess of the Organization's formal procurement threshold ($50,000), management did not retain documentation of having obtained the required number of competitive bids or document rationale for sole procurement, did not document the history of procurement decisions, and was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction.
Cause and Effect A lack of controls to ensure required procurement activities were performed could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards.
Recommendation We recommend that management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with federal procurement standards. Additionally, we recommend management review its internal procurement policy regularly to ensure compliance with federal procurement standards under 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327.
Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Careful consideration was done in selecting the vendors to look at obtaining the best cost for the value of the service as IWS was responsible for a portion of the expenses. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement processes and controls in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name 21.027, U.S. Department of the Treasury, COVID 19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, and 93.493, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Congressional Directives
Federal Award Identification Number and Year 21.027 192908 and 93.493 6 CE2CS52794 01 07
Pass through Entity 21.027 Chicago Department of Public Health; 93.493 N/A
Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations
Repeat Finding No
Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.
Per 2 CFR 200.319(a) All procurement transactions under the federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition and is consistent with the standards of this section and § 200.320(b) covering formal procurement methods.
Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals.
Finally, per 2 CFR 180.300, nonfederal entities must verify that outside parties are not suspended or debarred from engaging in federal activity before entering into a covered transaction.
Condition Controls were not sufficient to ensure procurement activities were performed in accordance with 2 CFR 200 and management’s internal policies and procedures related to procurement, suspension, and debarment.
Questioned Costs $ 237,890
If Questioned Costs are not Determinable, Description of why Known Questioned Costs Were Undetermined or Otherwise Could not be Reported N/A
Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed Questioned costs represent expenditures under these contracts reported on the SEFA.
Context For three contracts in excess of the Organization's formal procurement threshold ($50,000), management did not retain documentation of having obtained the required number of competitive bids or document rationale for sole procurement, did not document the history of procurement decisions, and was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction.
Cause and Effect A lack of controls to ensure required procurement activities were performed could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards.
Recommendation We recommend that management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with federal procurement standards. Additionally, we recommend management review its internal procurement policy regularly to ensure compliance with federal procurement standards under 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327.
Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Careful consideration was done in selecting the vendors to look at obtaining the best cost for the value of the service as IWS was responsible for a portion of the expenses. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement processes and controls in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name 21.027, U.S. Department of the Treasury, COVID 19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, and 93.493, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Congressional Directives
Federal Award Identification Number and Year 21.027 192908 and 93.493 6 CE2CS52794 01 07
Pass through Entity 21.027 Chicago Department of Public Health; 93.493 N/A
Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations
Repeat Finding No
Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.
Per 2 CFR 200.319(a) All procurement transactions under the federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition and is consistent with the standards of this section and § 200.320(b) covering formal procurement methods.
Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals.
Finally, per 2 CFR 180.300, nonfederal entities must verify that outside parties are not suspended or debarred from engaging in federal activity before entering into a covered transaction.
Condition Controls were not sufficient to ensure procurement activities were performed in accordance with 2 CFR 200 and management’s internal policies and procedures related to procurement, suspension, and debarment.
Questioned Costs $ 237,890
If Questioned Costs are not Determinable, Description of why Known Questioned Costs Were Undetermined or Otherwise Could not be Reported N/A
Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed Questioned costs represent expenditures under these contracts reported on the SEFA.
Context For three contracts in excess of the Organization's formal procurement threshold ($50,000), management did not retain documentation of having obtained the required number of competitive bids or document rationale for sole procurement, did not document the history of procurement decisions, and was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction.
Cause and Effect A lack of controls to ensure required procurement activities were performed could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards.
Recommendation We recommend that management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with federal procurement standards. Additionally, we recommend management review its internal procurement policy regularly to ensure compliance with federal procurement standards under 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327.
Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Careful consideration was done in selecting the vendors to look at obtaining the best cost for the value of the service as IWS was responsible for a portion of the expenses. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement processes and controls in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.