Corrective Action Plans

Finding 2025-002: Noncompliance with OMB Compliance Supplement; Period of Performance (H) for Assistance Listing Number (ALN) 93.958 Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h) states “a non-Federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award's period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entities.” Costs incurred before or after the period of performance are unallowable unless explicitly approved. Condition: During our testing of expenditures charged to ALN 93.958, we identified 2 transactions out of a total sample of 15 totaling $192 that were incurred outside of the award’s period of performance. Corrective Action Plan: To ensure compliance and accurate reporting, we established internal control protocols for the formal review of service dates, verifying that all expenditures correspond to the appropriate period of performance. The Controller's signature on formal, documented month end checklists will serve as confirmation that all year-end invoices have been checked for appropriate period distribution. Responsible Person for Corrective Action Plan: Addy Hiles (Controller) Implementation Date for Corrective Action Plan: September 2025

2025-003 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Assistance Listing Number 21.027 Recommendation: We recommend procedures be strengthened to ensure that charges to the grant program are obligated and/or incurred within the period of performance. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The City acknowledges the finding related to documentation supporting the period of performance for expenditures reported under the SLFRF revenue loss category. Because the City applied the standard allowance for revenue loss and did not track specific expenditures to the grant at the transaction level, some expenditures initially provided for testing were outside the period of performance, although sufficient eligible expenditures existed within the allowable period. To address this issue, the Finance Department will implement procedures to maintain supporting schedules identifying government service expenditures incurred within the applicable period of performance that support amounts reported under the revenue loss category. Finance will also implement a review process to verify that expenditures identified for compliance or audit testing meet applicable period of performance and obligation requirements. These procedures will strengthen documentation and ensure expenditures supporting SLFRF revenue loss are clearly identified and supported for compliance purposes. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Michael Tucker, Deputy Finance Director Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Implemented immediately and effective for all current and future federal awards.

2025-002 Special Education Cluster - Assistance Listing Number 84.027, 84.173 Recommendation: We recommend procedures be strengthened to ensure that charges to the grant program are incurred within the period of performance included in the grant award. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The City will implement procedures to ensure that expenditures charged to federal awards are incurred within the approved period of performance in accordance with 2 CFR §§ 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403. The School Department will enhance its grant monitoring procedures by maintaining a tracking schedule of grant periods of performance and reviewing invoices and payment requests for compliance with grant award dates prior to processing. School Department Finance staff will also provide guidance to departments administering grants to ensure expenditures are incurred and submitted within the allowable grant period. These procedures will strengthen internal controls and reduce the risk of expenditures being charged outside the approved period of performance. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Brian Cisneros, Business Administrator Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Implemented immediately and effective for all current and future federal awards.

FINDING 2025-006 Finding Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Period of Performance Summary of Finding: The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls to ensure transactions made with the Special Education Grant funding occurred within the appropriate period of performance. Claims for the Special Education programs were paid without an appropriate level of review or oversight to ensure the expenditures charged to each grant were within the allowed time frame. Although the reimbursement requests submitted to the Indiana Department of Education were prepared and approved by two different employees, the School Corporation was unable to provide evidence of this review and approval process, which may have included a review of the costs included on each request to verify they were within the correct period of performance. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Kim Holmquist Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 219-924-4250 kholmquist@griffith.k12.in.us View of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: Griffith Public Schools will be developing, implementing, and documenting, a system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals and oversight are taking place. A grant consultant has been contracted to assist in managing grants. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2026

Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Corrective Action Plan – Period of Performance Finding (FY 2024) • Improved Internal Controls o Rensselaer Central and Cooperative School Services will implement additional review procedures to ensure all federal grant obligations occur within the allowable grant period and that vendor payments align with the original approved purchase orders. • Verification of Obligation Dates o Fiscal staff will verify that purchase orders, vendor invoices, and final payments reflect an obligatory date that occurs prior to the applicable grant deadline. • Staff Training o Rensselaer Central and Cooperative School Services Fiscal personnel involved in grant management will receive training on federal grant period of performance requirements and proper documentation of obligations. • Monitoring Procedures o Rensselaer Central and Cooperative School Services will conduct periodic reviews of federal grant expenditures to ensure ongoing compliance with grant timelines. • Statement of Isolated Occurrence o Rensselaer Central and Cooperative School Services reviewed the circumstances surrounding this finding and determined that the issue was isolated to fiscal year 2024. Responsible Party and Timeline for Completion: Corrective action plan has been implemented as this finding impacted fiscal year 2024 but did not recur in fiscal year 2025. The Director of Special Education, Cooperative School Services Bookkeeper, and Rensselaer Central Treasurer will oversee the corrective action plan to monitor the eligibility requirements on an ongoing basis.

Corrective Action Plan: The University accepts this finding and has removed the questioned costs from the award. Management will reinforce and reiterate the internal controls process to the staff responsible for the review of the grant expenditures during the financial reporting process. Management will also communicate via our Financial Administrative Bulletin to the grants administration community our internal controls around 2 CFR 200. Management will conduct 2 CFR 200 training with the impacted departmental grant administration by March 5, 2026 Completion Date: March 31, 2026 Contact Person: Paul Gasior 443-997-8141

Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Special Education Cluster program and Period of Performance compliance requirements. Context: During fiscal year 2023-24, the School Corporation was a member of Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. For Special Education Cluster awards, funds must be obligated during the 27 months, extending from July 1 of the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated through September 30 of the second following fiscal year. When testing transactions occurred in the liquidation period for the 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01 and 22619-047-ARP grant awards, two exceptions were identified in the sample of five transactions. For the above listed awards, costs must be obligated by September 30, 2023. For the two identified exceptions, an initial purchase order was made in September, but the ultimate transaction was paid to a separate vendor than the original purchase order, and this obligation was incurred in November 2023. This issue was isolated to fiscal year 2024. No costs incurred outside of the period of performance were identified in fiscal year 2025. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Management disagrees with part of the finding. The term “obligate” can be interpreted in various ways within our context. While we have a purchase order that was completed by September 30, we do agree that we changed vendors after September 30 and paid the non-public school directly. We agree with the finding that direct payment to a non-public school is not allowable. The purchase order is an internal written commitment to acquire the items/supplies, but it is not a binding written agreement to acquire “property” when we are purchasing supplies until it is provided to the vendor. The purchase order is authorization and approval to purchase the items/supplies. Once the purchase order is provided to the vendor, it is committed and is the binding written agreement. The invoice is an order to pay the obligation. Responsible Party and Timeline for Completion: Corrective action plan has been implemented as this finding impacted fiscal year 2024 but did not recur in fiscal year 2025. Sarah Claton, Cooperative School Services director, and Tracy Albertson, Director of Finance, will oversee the corrective action plan to monitor the cooperative on an ongoing basis.

Condition: Costs were charged to the grants for invoices with service dates prior to the start of the grant period and payroll and related benefits earned prior to the start of the grant period. Corrective Action Planned: We had budgeted the full cost of one teacher and four teaching assistances in the IDEA 240 grant for 2025. The approval process for the grant took longer than expected, our intent was always to comply, but we do realize we should have waited for the approval to be in place prior to charging the costs of these employees to the grant. In the future we will wait for the approval process to be complete and will then charge the employees there. Anticipated Completion Date: Completed Contact: Martin Anguelov, Chief Financial Officer for Nantucket Public Schools and Deb Gately, Director of Special Education for Nantucket Public Schools

Name of Contact Person: Karen Gillis Corrective Action Plan: This finding remains an unusual situation for BSFA. BSFA has not previously been in a situation where BSFA funded a contractor in the absence of the federal government’s inability to enter into a contractual agreement (due to the Trump Administrations strict limitations on entering into contractual agreements). The inability to demonstrate that costs were incurred lies with the contractor wherein we were unable to obtain from them their spending down the funds provided as originally agreed upon. We do not anticipate another instance such as this though we will implement stronger controls over contract payments in the future so expenditures are supported by documentation showing costs were incurred within the approved period of performance. Proposed Completion Date: February 28, 2026

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 2025-002 Special Education Cluster Grants – ALN’s 84.027 & 84.173 Recommendation: We recommend procedures be implemented to ensure that charges to the grant program are incurred within the period of performance included in the grant award. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: We have reviewed the finding and have since implemented controls to ensure that expenditures are charged to a grant only after final approval has been issued in the grant portal. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Aisha Oppong, Executive Director of Business and Support Services Planned completion date for corrective action plan: January 12, 2026.

The Department agrees with the recommendation. The Center for Accounting (CFA) and the Office of Transportation Safety (OTS) have coordinated to implement updated reviews and controls. This implementation involves reviewing current processes to ensure supporting documentation is vetted and grant compliance is verified prior to payment. It also includes assessing the need for increased monitoring to ensure initial program reviews are complete and accurate. This remediation effort was finalized on June 30, 2025, following the September 2024 transaction in question. Additionally, the Department plans to review the remediation plan with all relevant staff again this season. This will ensure that all supporting documentation is thoroughly vetted and that expenditures comply with the applicable award period of performance.

The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) agrees with the recommendation. The Center for Accounting (CFA) and the Office of Transportation Safety (OTS) have coordinated on its implementation. The Department has assessed and updated training for staff responsible for reviewing and approving invoices for Highway Safety Cluster grants, with a specific focus on the period of performance. This training plan will be revisited and reviewed with all staff involved by April 2026.

The purpose of the Goods Receipt (GR) is to record receipt of goods or services as soon as they are delivered and verified to be in acceptable condition. A Goods receipt must be posted in SAP for all items actually received. Vendors submit invoice(s) referencing the purchase order (PO) directly to Accounts Payable after delivery, indicating that the goods or services have been provided and requesting payment. Accounts Payable then reviews the vendor invoice, purchase order, and goods receipt in SAP to perform the required three-way match (PO, GR, and vendor invoice) before processing payment. 1. The Accounts Payable team will collaborate with the Procurement Services Division to establish and implement a process that ensures the timely review and reconciliation of Goods Receipt (GR) entries. This will include the development of clear guidance / training materials for schools and offices to periodically review their GR balances. Training will be conducted via Virtual Office Hours on a quarterly basis for sites to make necessary adjustments when the goods or services received differ from the original Purchase Order (PO) or the corresponding invoice. 2. The Accounts Payable team will collaborate with the Procurement Services Division to develop supplemental documentation and guidance regarding proof of delivery for goods and services received. 3. Accounts Payable staff will receive ongoing training throughout the year on documentation and reconciliation requirements, particularly when new internal controls, procedures, and processes are created. Training will be incorporated into regular team meetings, procedural updates, and onboarding for new team members to maintain alignment and accuracy across the department. The implementation target date for the above corrective action plan is June 30, 2026. Name: Rocio Saucedo Title: Director of Accounts Payable Contact Information: Rocio.Saucedo@lausd.net

Planned Corrective Action: The district will implement controls for monitoring reporting grant requirements and grant expenditures to ensure compliance with reporting and period of performance requirements for federal grants. Anticipated Completion Date: 6/30/26 Responsible Contact Person: Hiwot Abraha

Finding 2025 – 002- Allowable Costs & Period of Performance (Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance) Management’s Response: Management concurs with the above finding, and the Fiscal Service Office will implement corrective action before September 2026. Management acknowledges the process gap as indicated and noted in the above findings. To strengthen policies and procedures surrounding grant disbursements and ensure expenses are properly approved and allowable under the specific grant budget, the Fiscal Service Office along with the Human Resources Department will implement a process to properly document, review, and approve all allowable grant pay rates and salaries.

Material Weakness Item 2025-003 - Period of Performance - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Center Program Cluster (Assistance Listing Number 93.224/93.527) Notice of Award Number 6 HB0CS00505-23-04, 6 H2ECS45602-02-04, 1 H8LCS50772-01-00 and 6 H8/-ICS46163-03-01 During our audit, we noted that LBUCC drew down $190,688 of federal grant funds under the Section 330 program for the budget period beginning June 1, 2024 to reimburse salary expenses incurred in May 2024. Recommendation: We recommend that LBUCC implement procedures to ensure that all drawdowns are supported by expenses incurred strictly within the grant's approved period of performance and train staff on grant compliance requirements. Action Taken: A change in the process to draw down funds has been implemented to determine that the funds were incurred in the proper funding period rather than the period it was paid. Effectivity Date: Process change was implemented 12/1/2025.

2025-001 Costs Incurred Beyond the Period of Performance Criteria: According to 2 CFR §§200.1, 200.308, 200.309, 200.344, and 200.403(h), a non-Federal entity may only charge allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of the Federal award’s period of performance, and any costs incurred before the Federal award was made that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. All financial obligations incurred under the Federal award must be liquidated within the required time period. Costs incurred outside the approved period of performance are unallowable and constitute questioned costs. Client’s Response: During the grant cycle, the Organization submitted for an extension but did not receive confirmation of said extension. During the current fiscal year, the Organization has implemented additional controls to ensure that all grant funding is expended within the timeframe allotted. Proposed Implementation Date – 12/31/2025 Name of Contact Person – John Edwards, Sr. Email: jledwards@umadaop.org Phone: 419-255-4444

Finding 2025.004 – Period of Performance Federal Program Name: Continuum of Care Federal Assisted Listing Number:: 14.267 Recommendation We recommend that management implement additional controls and policies over period of performance. Staff who purchase items with grant funds should have additional training on period of performance requirements. Planned Corrective Action: TVCCA is strengthening its period of performance controls through the following actions: 1. Training – All employees with purchasing power will be trained on the deadlines of the grants they are responsible for. This training includes what the definition of obligation truly is, as well as allowable spend down period of their grants. Finance staff will also be trained on the timing and definitions of obligations. 2. Revised internal controls and workflow – Cutoff testing will be performed and added to the month close checklist on a quarterly basis to align with grant closing schedules. 3. Monitoring – Cutoff testing will be monitored on a quarterly basis in association with quarter ending checklist. Name of Contact Person: Max Logan, CFO, 860-425-6506, mlogan@tvcca.org Anticipated Completion Date: March 31, 2026

Finding Number 2024-075 Subject Heading (Financial) or AL no. and program name (Federal) ALN: 21.027 Federal Program name: Coronavirus State And Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Planned Corrective Action Office of Management and Enterprise Services – Grants Management Office Response: OMES-GMO respectfully disagrees with several conclusions contained in this finding. The finding concludes that the transfer of CSLFRF funds to the twenty-two (22) state agencies does not create a subrecipient relationship because OMES and the agencies are part of the same State of Oklahoma Single Audit. OMESGMO respectfully disagrees with this conclusion. Pursuant to 62 O.S. § 255.1, “The Legislature authorizes the Office of Management and Enterprise Services to manage federal APRA funds by requiring all receiving entities known as subrecipients to sign a grant agreement. Any entity, without exception, including state agencies receiving an appropriation from the Statewide Recovery Fund or a similar fund with federal requirement attached to its use shall have a fully executed grant agreement in place within sixty (60) days after enactment of any legislation that appropriates funding from the Statewide Recovery Fund of the State Treasury created in Section 1, Chapter 319, O.S.L. 2022, and be in compliance with such agreement before a disbursement can be made.” Under this statutory framework, each agency enters into a Grant Agreement with OMES and is subject to grant-specific terms and conditions, reporting requirements, monitoring, and ongoing oversight. Accordingly, OMES has administered the CSLFRF grant in accordance with state law and consistent with its responsibilities as the State's designated pass-through entity since the inception of the program. The authorization from the Oklahoma State Legislature has provided for a much more extensive oversight of the state entity subrecipients than would exist if OMES followed the model suggested by SAI, as OMES would not be subject to the subrecipient monitoring Federal regulation under 2 CFR § 200.332, for these state entities. By following the state law passed by the Legislature, OMES monitors each state entity subrecipient, and in turn, has signed a grant agreement with these state entity subrecipients that requires them to do the same for any of their subrecipients that are administering projects set out specifically by the State Legislature through appropriation bills. OMES requests SAI to revisit the position that these state entities are not OMES’ subrecipients and consider the implications that if OMES were to treat the state entities as non-subrecipients, OMES would be in direct defiance of state law. OMES-GMO also disagrees with the conclusion that sufficient supporting documentation was unavailable for several of the transactions identified in this finding. OMESGMO is committed to strong documentation standards, reimbursement review procedures, and project oversight to ensure continued compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Despite OMES-GMO’s request to be included in audit communication with the state entities, SAI’s documentation requests for the sampled expenditures were directed primarily to the individual agencies. Several agencies experienced staffing changes during the audit period, resulting in inconsistencies in responding to documentation requests and, in some instances, uncertainty regarding the specific information being requested by the auditors. In multiple cases, the supporting documentation ultimately existed and was available but was either maintained by OMES-GMO or inadvertently omitted from the agency's initial submission. If OMES-GMO was afforded the opportunity to submit or explain documentation maintained by its office before the finding was finalized, both the administering agency and OMES-GMO would have been able to provide a more complete record for evaluation and may have altered the conclusions reached for certain transactions. OMES-GMO has had recent conversations with SAI regarding this issue, and are encouraged by the willingness of SAI to be open to working with OMES-GMO to facilitate a different process for future audits that involves a coordinated with both the administering agency and OMES-GMO so that auditors have access to the complete record before audit conclusions are finalized. Agency Responses: Agency 025 – Oklahoma Military Department (OMD) OMD partially concurs with the finding regarding the level of supporting documentation submitted with the vendor's invoices for payment. However, the construction contracts in question were executed using Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) contract structures. Under these contracts, the contractor is responsible for maintaining all subcontractor invoices, material invoices, and supporting financial records associated with each progress payment. The contracts require these records to be retained for the applicable record retention period and made available for review by the agency, State, or federal government upon request. Agency 085 – Oklahoma Broadband Office (OBO) Broadband Mapping / Cross-Grant Expenditures The Oklahoma Broadband Office (OBO) requests the transactional detail associated with these findings to allow the agency to fully evaluate the questioned transactions. While OBO agrees that expenditures must be charged to the appropriate federal funding source and class fund, the office respectfully disagrees that the questioned expenditures represented unallowable supplementation of other federal awards. The contracts included shared deliverables necessary to complete the CSLFRF Broadband Mapping project. During contract administration, OBO identified billing discrepancies involving work performed under multiple grant programs. Following approximately eleven months of negotiations, OBO entered into a settlement agreement with the contractor that limited payment to services actually received and excluded services that were not performed. The resulting payments represented services provided under multiple funding sources and were processed together to accurately reflect work completed during FY2024. Procurement Finding – Lee Consulting Contract OBO concurs with the finding that services began prior to the execution of a purchase order for the April 2023 services. Upon identifying the issue, OBO completed the required ABS Form 009 Ratification Agreement to formally document the procurement exception and properly authorize payment. To prevent future occurrences, OBO has: • Hired a full-time General Counsel to oversee contract administration and procurement compliance. • Implemented a policy prohibiting execution of contracts or commencement of work until a purchase order has been fully approved and funds have been encumbered. • Provided procurement training to management and staff regarding Oklahoma encumbrance requirements. Agency 400 – Office of Juvenile Affairs (OJA) OJA partially concurs with the finding. The agency believes the purchase of a Keurig coffee maker and heater towers by Western Plains falls within the approved project scope for the purchase and installation of furniture, fixtures, and equipment. However, OJA acknowledges that decorative wall art purchased by Youth and Family Services of Hughes and Seminole Counties does not appear to fall within the approved project scope. Agency 452 – Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services (ODMHSAS) ODMHSAS acknowledges the documentation and procurement concerns identified in the finding. Specifically, the agency recognizes that certain invoices lacked sufficient detail describing services performed and that one expenditure required ratification because services were obligated prior to encumbering funds. ODMHSAS agrees that federally funded expenditures should be supported by documentation demonstrating the services performed, the project purpose, and the relationship to the approved scope of work. ODMHSAS also agrees that obligations should not be incurred before a valid purchase order and encumbrance have been established. Agency 619 – Oklahoma Health Care Workers Training Commission (HWTC) During the period associated with the questioned expenditure, the Care Providers program submitted a significant volume of supporting documentation with each reimbursement request, often consisting of 500 to 1,000 pages transmitted through multiple emails over several days. In some instances, the documentation was not organized sequentially, making it difficult to efficiently compile and review the complete reimbursement package. As staff assembled documentation received through multiple transmissions, a portion of the supporting documentation was inadvertently omitted from the reimbursement file maintained by the agency. Consequently, the complete documentation package was not included in the materials submitted to OMES-GMO with the reimbursement request. To address this issue, management revised its documentation review procedures. Rather than requiring agency staff to reorganize incomplete or disorganized submissions, staff are now instructed to return reimbursement packages that are incomplete or not properly organized and require the submitting entity to provide a revised, complete documentation package. This change places responsibility for maintaining complete supporting documentation with the originating entity and has resulted in more organized reimbursement submissions while reducing the risk of incomplete supporting records. Agency 830 – Oklahoma Department of Human Services (DHS) DHS disagrees that the questioned incentive gift cards were outside the approved project scope. The PCCT Fatherhood Today program is designed to strengthen father-parent-child relationships by engaging fathers through education, support services, and community resources. The program targets fathers residing in underserved communities who often face barriers to participation, including transportation, childcare, financial hardship, and food insecurity. The $100 gift cards are provided only after participants successfully complete the twelve-week 24/7 Dad curriculum. The gift cards serve as an incentive to recruit and retain participants and support the program's objective of increasing father engagement. DHS believes the incentives directly support successful program participation and allow participants to obtain essential household items for their families. DHS further noted that participant outcomes are measured through pre- and post-program assessments demonstrating increased knowledge and engagement among participating fathers. Gift cards are purchased using agency purchasing procedures, maintained in secured storage, and distributed only upon successful completion of all program requirements with appropriate documentation maintained for each recipient Anticipated Completion Date OMES: December 31, 2026 025: Completed 085: Completed 400: Completed 452: December 31, 2026 619: December 31, 2026 830: Completed Responsible Contact Person OMES: Elizabeth Base 025: Angela Tackett 085: Beverlee Harbuck 400: Kevin Haddock 452: Chad Carden 619: Kami Fullingim 830: Lindsey Kanaly

Finding Number 2024-043 Subject Heading (Financial) or AL no. and program name (Federal) ALN: 21.027 Federal Program name: Coronavirus State And Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Planned Corrective Action Office of Management Enterprise Services – Grant Management Office Response: The Oklahoma Office of Management and Enterprise Services (OMES) agrees that strong project planning and feasibility evaluations for large-scale capital projects are important processes for each individual agency to implement. OMES also recognizes that certain factors can impact the original evaluation, and if those factors occur, reevaluation of a project’s feasibility is a prudent measure to determine the future direction of a project. The Federal regulation 2 CFR § 200.317, directs that “a State must follow the same policies and procedures it uses for procurements from its non-Federal funds.” Oklahoma has laws in place for state agencies for the purchase of tangible and intangible property, which ensure obligations are properly encumbered by a contract or purchase order. Therefore, OMES agrees that in order to be in compliance with federal and state laws and regulations, each individual agency should have strong internal controls in place to ensure obligations of federal funds are properly encumbered before commitments are made. ODMHSAS Response to Finding No. 2024-043 ODMHSAS partially concurs with Finding No. 2024-043. ODMHSAS agrees that controls should be strengthened for large-scale federally funded capital projects and acknowledges the separate encumbrance issue identified in the finding. ODMHSAS does not concede that the full $6,218,295 questioned amount was wasted, unallowable, or subject to repayment based solely on the later cancellation of the original Donahue new-build project. ODMHSAS acknowledges that the original Donahue Behavioral Health Campus new-build project did not proceed to construction and that the Department later pursued a different facility solution through acquisition and renovation of an existing facility. The Donahue project, however, was an active, legislatively funded capital project intended to replace Griffin Memorial Hospital at the time the expenditures were incurred. Based on the available expenditure detail, the questioned-cost population includes architectural services, site or lease-related payments, consulting services, surveying or mapping services, and other planning and development costs associated with the project. ODMHSAS recognizes that the original project did not result in a completed capital asset. ODMHSAS also recognizes that federal allowability requires more than the existence of an approved project. Costs must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and adequately documented. For that reason, ODMHSAS will conduct a reasonable transaction-level review using available records to determine what documentation exists for the expenditures identified in this finding, what work was performed, whether any deliverable or work product was received, whether the expenditure provided planning, feasibility, decision-making, or other project value, and whether further coordination with OMESGMO is needed regarding accounting treatment or other resolution. ODMHSAS further notes that the decision to discontinue the original Donahue new-build project should not, by itself, determine whether every planning or development cost incurred before cancellation was wasted or unallowable. ODMHSAS did not pay for a completed building at that stage of the project; it paid for planning, design, cost-estimating, site-evaluation, and feasibility-related services for an authorized replacement hospital project. The SLFRF capitalexpenditure framework recognizes that recipients may evaluate the need addressed, the appropriateness of a capital expenditure, and alternative capital approaches before determining the best path forward. Available information indicates the original concept contemplated moving both Griffin Memorial Hospital and CRC functions to the Donahue site, and the project scope, bed count, and estimated cost were later reevaluated as construction costs increased significantly, including post-COVID construction-cost escalation. Those services produced project information, design materials, cost information, and feasibility analysis that provided decision-making value, including information that helped ODMHSAS determine that the original newbuild approach was not financially feasible and that an alternative facility solution was necessary before substantially greater construction costs were incurred. ODMHSAS will therefore review the expenditures by category and transaction rather than treating the later cancellation of the project as dispositive of the allowability or value of each prior cost. ODMHSAS also notes the timing of the legislative and project changes. On October 5, 2022, the Legislature appropriated $87 million through HB 1013 for construction of a replacement facility for Griffin Memorial Hospital. During SFY 2024, ODMHSAS incurred planning, design, and initial development expenditures for the Donahue Behavioral Health Campus. The original new-build approach later became financially infeasible due to escalating construction costs and budget shortfalls, and by May 2025 ODMHSAS had moved away from the original construction plan and pursued acquisition and renovation of the former SSM Health facility as the successor facility solution. SB 1178 then reappropriated and redesignated $66.5 million of the original $87 million appropriation from construction of a replacement facility for Griffin Memorial Hospital to purchase and renovation of a replacement facility for Griffin Memorial Hospital, within the same thirty (30) mile geographic limitation. SB 1178 also recognized that the original appropriation could be reduced by prior expenditures, encumbrances, and transfers. ODMHSAS does not contend that SB 1178 alone resolves the allowability of prior costs, but it is relevant context showing that the remaining project funding was redirected by legislative action for the same public-health purpose of replacing Griffin Memorial Hospital. ODMHSAS further notes that the successor SSM acquisition and renovation project continued the same underlying public health purpose as the original Donahue project: replacing Griffin Memorial Hospital and expanding behavioral health treatment capacity. Available SSM transaction documents reflect that ODMHSAS pursued the purchase of the property at 2129 S.W. 59th Street for use in addressing the ongoing demand for mental health services, and related lease documentation reflects that ARPA-SLFRF funds used for the lease were designated for behavioral health services expansion. After the original Donahue new-build approach was no longer financially viable, ODMHSAS pursued the SSM acquisition and renovation approach as a feasible alternative to continue the Griffin replacement purpose. ODMHSAS will also review whether any amounts included in the federal questioned-cost population were recovered, refunded, offset, corrected, or otherwise resolved after the original expenditure. Separately, ODMHSAS has identified Donahue-related refund activity associated with private donations and grants, including an Oklahoma State University refund of $4,822,671.93, donor refunds totaling $1,820,000, and a remaining balance of $3,002,671.93 as of March 26, 2026. Based on current information, ODMHSAS understands this activity to relate to private donations and grants, not CSLFRF/ARPA funds. ODMHSAS will review the underlying accounting records to confirm the funding source, deposit, refund, and remaining balance treatment, and to ensure that this private donation and grant activity is treated separately from the federal questioned-cost population. ODMHSAS has also identified local contribution activity within the questioned-cost population that requires further review. Based on initial internal review, approximately $2.5 million of the questioned-cost population appears to relate to Oklahoma County and City of Oklahoma City contributions associated with the Donahue project, including $1.5 million from Oklahoma County and $1 million from the City of Oklahoma City. ODMHSAS understands that the Oklahoma County amount was repaid in December 2025 and that the City of Oklahoma City amount remains associated with the successor OKCBHC/SSM project or related project accounting. ODMHSAS will review the underlying accounting records, funding-source documentation, refund records, and project accounting treatment to determine whether these local contribution amounts should remain in the federal questioned-cost population, should be treated separately, or should otherwise affect the questioned-cost amount. ODMHSAS acknowledges the separate encumbrance issue related to claim 629685. Based on available records, the claim involved an obligation for services that was incurred before the applicable purchase order and encumbrance process was completed, requiring a subsequent ratification. The Department recognizes that obligations should not be incurred before a valid purchase order and encumbrance are in place. As reflected in the finding, the $50,000 claim was corrected by payment with state funds and was not questioned. ODMHSAS will address that issue through strengthened pre-obligation controls, procurement review, and targeted guidance or training for staff responsible for initiating purchases or contracts. Nothing in this response should be construed as an admission that the full questioned-cost amount is unallowable or subject to repayment. ODMHSAS will coordinate with OMESGMO as needed after review of the available records, including any refund, recovery, offset, correction, or other accounting issue relevant to the questioned-cost population. Corrective Action Planned ODMHSAS will take reasonable steps to strengthen controls over planning, documentation, procurement, and encumbrance review for significant federally funded capital projects. ODMHSAS will develop or update internal review procedures for significant federally funded capital-project expenditures. The procedures will address project scope, available funding, estimated project cost, material changes in feasibility, and approval authority before substantial planning, design, development, or construction-related costs are incurred. The review process will be scaled to the size, complexity, and funding source of the project. ODMHSAS will also strengthen documentation expectations for federally funded capital project invoices. For future expenditures, invoices or supporting materials should identify the services performed, billing period, project phase, and connection to the approved project scope. Where invoices contain only general descriptions, such as “progress billing” or “work completed,” ODMHSAS will seek additional support from the vendor, project manager, or available project file before approving the cost for federal reimbursement. ODMHSAS will require program or project-level confirmation that services were received and were related to the approved project before payment or reimbursement is processed. Finance and Procurement will review federally funded capital-project expenditures for appropriate coding, available support, and compliance with applicable funding and encumbrance requirements. ODMHSAS will conduct a risk-based review of the Donahue expenditures identified in Finding No. 2024-043 using available records. The review will focus on identifying the vendor, amount, funding source, available support, and whether any cost was refunded, recovered, offset, corrected, or requires additional accounting review or coordination with OMES-GMO. Because many of the underlying project decisions and records predate current leadership and staff, ODMHSAS will conduct this review based on the documentation reasonably available to the Department. As part of that review, ODMHSAS will review available accounting and reporting records for the Donahue and SSM projects to determine how ARPA-SLFRF funds associated with the replacement-facility work were obligated, reported, redirected, or applied to the successor Griffin replacement facility project, and whether that treatment affects the federal questioned-cost population. ODMHSAS will separately review the Donahue-related private donation and grant refund activity, including the OSU-OKC settlement documentation, to confirm the funding source, deposit, refund, and remaining balance treatment, and to ensure that non-federal donation and grant activity is not included in, or confused with, the federal questioned-cost population. ODMHSAS will also review the Oklahoma County and City of Oklahoma City contribution amounts identified within the questioned-cost population, including documentation of the reported Oklahoma County repayment and the accounting treatment of the City of Oklahoma City contribution, to determine whether those amounts should remain in the federal questioned-cost population, should be treated separately, or otherwise affect the questioned-cost amount. To address the encumbrance concern, ODMHSAS will implement or reinforce a pre-obligation verification process for future procurements. Staff responsible for initiating purchases, contracts, task orders, or service authorizations will be directed to confirm that a valid purchase order and encumbrance are in place before authorizing work. Any transaction requiring ratification will be reviewed to determine the cause and whether additional corrective action is needed. ODMHSAS will provide targeted written guidance and, as needed, training to appropriate staff regarding federal documentation requirements, invoice review, project-scope review, funding-source verification, and state encumbrance requirements. Anticipated Completion Date ODMHSAS anticipates completing updated procedures, review checklists, and targeted written guidance by June 30, 2027. Because the Donahue review requires analysis of historical project expenditures, related accounting and reporting records, multiple funding sources, and coordination with OMESGMO, ODMHSAS anticipates completing the risk-based transaction review and related followup by December 31, 2027. Responsible Contact Person OMES: Elizabeth Base 452: Chad Carden

VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS The PRDF Human Resources Department will conduct personal file reviews at the beginning of next fiscal year; to include any missing paperwork and the department will establish as a procedure a periodical review of all files. IMPLEMENTATION DATE First quarter of Fiscal Year 2026-2027 RESPONSIBLE PERSON Waleska Lopez Faria Assistant Secretary for Human Resources

VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS ADSEF acknowledges the findings regarding the lack of documentation for one employee and the payroll discrepancies identified in the FY 2024 single audit. We conclude that the inability to provide personnel files for validation of wages charged to the federal program constitutes a material weakness in internal controls over allowable costs. ADSEF will conduct a comprehensive reconciliation of all payroll registers against personnel records for the affected periods to ensure that only eligible, verified, and properly documented costs are charged to the TANF program. Action step: 1. Personnel Record Audit 2. Policy Update 3. Payroll Reconciliation 4. Training IMPLEMENTATION DATE During Fiscal Year 2026-2027 RESPONSIBLE PERSON Eddie J. Burgos Auxiliary Administrator for Finance and Budget Coral M. Caceres Alvarez Auxiliary Administrator Human Resources Carlos Martinez Colón Finance Director Vanessa Ayala Gerena Director of Budget

Planned Corrective Action: The Division will implement their control of ensuring that they only charge allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance or will obtain authorization from the grantor for any costs incurred before the grant's approved budget period. Anticipated Completion Date: 9/30/2026 Responsible Contact Person: Al Agpoon, Golden State Division Controller

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Department of Human Services respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2024. Audit period: July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2024 The findings from the schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. FINDINGS—FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS AUDITS Department of Human Services Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program – Assistance Listing No. 93.568 Recommendation: The Department should review and enhance its procedures and internal controls to ensure that it charges expenditures to the program that are incurred within an award’s allowable period of performance. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: No disagreement. Action taken in response to finding: The Department has made changes in the Office of Budget and Finance Leadership team and continues to do so at every level. The Department will review and enhance its procedures and internal controls to ensure that it charges expenditures to the program that are incurred within an award’s allowable period of performance. Currently, expenditures are recorded in the State’s Financial Management Information System (FMIS) with program cost accounting codes used to identify the funding source(s) for each activity. The system-generated report summarizes the information and includes the effective date of the activity. In turn, this same report is used to run the cost allocation to properly charge the exact costs to the funding source. Currently information is manually inputted into multiple spreadsheets to prepare the federal reports resulting in the possibility for errors. This significantly impedes the accuracy of the data being reported to federal grants and the provision of supporting documentation. As such, the Department will partner with external consultants to develop a better and more seamless recording structure for grant expenditures to the general ledger. This structure will require quarterly review by the Deputy Cost Allocation Revenue Management Director (CARM), the Cost Allocation Revenue Management Director, and the Deputy Chief Financial Officer. The Department will create a database and document repository to track the submission and reconciliation for federal grant reporting. The document repository will include the FMIS generated report and the cost allocation results table. Upon submission to the federal grant

U.S. Department of Education (USDE) Maryland State Department of Education respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2024. Audit period: July 1, 2023-June 30, 2024 The findings from the schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. Finding is numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. FINDINGS—FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS AUDITS Maryland State Department of Education 2024-023 Special Education Cluster– Assistance Listing No. 84.027, 84.173 Recommendation: The Department should review and enhance its procedures and internal controls to ensure that it charges expenditures to the program that are incurred within an award’s allowable period of performance. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: MSDE will review and enhance its Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and internal controls to ensure that it charges expenditures (including accounts payable and payroll) to Federal programs that are incurred within an award’s allowable period of performance. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Neeta Gandhi Executive Director Office of Program Fiscal Operations and Local Strategic Finance Jenna Meinl Director Office of Procurement and Contract Management Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2025 If the USDE has questions regarding this plan, please call Patricia Ramallosa at 410- 767-0103. Page 2 Approval of Response to the CLA Findings and Recommendations: Document Version Approval Date Approved by Signature 1.0 Mar 29, 2025 Neeta Gandhi, Executive Director-Office of Program Fiscal Operations & Local Strategic Finance Mar 29, 2025 Jenna Meinl, Director-Office of Procurement and Contract Management Mar 29, 2025 Donna Gunning, Assistant Superintendent of Financial Policy, Planning, Operations & Strategy Mar 29, 2025 Shawn Rushing, Assistant Superintendent of Administration Mar 29, 2025 Krishnanda Tallur, Deputy Superintendent of Finance and Operations