Corrective Action Plans

FINDING 2022-005 Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund - Annual Data Report Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness FINDING 2022?005 (Continued) Condition: The School Corporation did not have a documented review control in place to ensure the annual data report was reviewed by someone other than the preparer. Context: There was no documented review by someone other than the preparer of the Annual Data Report to ensure the information submitted was complete and accurate. Additionally, the School Corporation was not able to provide support for the total expenditures reported on the Year 1 Annual Report. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and will take the following corrective action ... Responsible party and timeline for completion: Brian L Christner, will ensure that all data reports and reviewed and signed by a third party. Completion date is April 30, 2023.

Finding 2022-055 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, ALN 93.558 - Accuracy of Financial Reports Management Views MDHHS agrees with the finding. Planned Corrective Action MDHHS will revise the financial reports for the quarters ending September 30, 2022, and December 31, 2022, and submit to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families by May 15, 2023. MDHHS will also evaluate the internal control approval process and determine if any changes are needed. Anticipated Completion Date MDHHS will complete its evaluation of the internal control approval process by September 30, 2023, and will then develop a timeline for implementing changes identified during the evaluation, if applicable. Responsible Individual(s) Rebecca Jones, MDHHS Tiffany Clarke, MDHHS Emiliza Noel, MDHHS

Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with this finding and will write policies and procedures for Federal awards.

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN October 7, 2022 Kansas State Department of Education and Kansas State Department of Administration Unified School District Number 374 respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2022. Dirks, Anthony & Duncan, LLC Po Box 885 Ulysses, KS 67880 Audit Period: June 30, 2022 FINDINGS ? FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS AUDIT U.S. Department of Education Passed Through Kansas State Department of Education Program Name: Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund II (ESSER) Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425D Finding 2022-001 Recommendations: The District should have an employee, not in the position of District Secretary, compare the Financial Manager?s ESSER report before its submission to the State of Kansas for its accuracy with board approved financial information. After the approval by the secondary review employee, the report submitted should be printed, initialed by the secondary reviewer, stapled with the information used to compile the report and combined with all financial records for the fiscal year. The District should also ensure that the positions involved with the financial reporting of the ESSER funds have adequate training for the recording and reporting of the federal monies. Action Taken: We agree with the recommendation. Our targeted implementation date is March 2023. If the Kansas State Department of Education and/or Kansas State Department of Administration has questions regarding this plan, please call Rex Richardson at 620-675-2277 Sincerely yours, Rex Richardson Superintendent

Compliance requirement ? Allowed Cost /Cost Principle Institutional Comments on Findings and Recommendations: 1. The institution does not concur with the auditor finding because the referenced transaction was below the "Micro-purchase" threshold and does not require a quotation. The FAR increase the "Micro-purchase" threshold for natural disasters and national emergencies, among others. The invoice amount of $5899 was a continuation of an initial project under this contractor which have the unique security passwords, IT protocols and other IT requirements for the uniform implementation of intelligent classrooms for remote distance education. Accordingly, the institution does not request a quote. The institution followed the referenced guidelines in the determining the allowability of costs. Additionally, an external consultant reviewed the transaction and costs prior to request reimbursement. The 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XI Compliance Supplement guide, issued April 2022, makes referenced to the FAQ's and Other Guidance containing information pertinent to the compliance requirements described in the document and encouraged auditor to regularly check the HERF Websites for updated FAQ's and other pertinent guidance and reporting information. The institution followed those referenced FAQ's and guidelines, among other sound administration practices, in the use of the grants. The referenced Compliance Supplemental, under "Activities Allowed or Unallowed" states: "Institutions must demonstrate that costs incurred are allowable under the relevant statutory provision and consistent with the purpose of the ESF "to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus"". The institution used $5,899 paid to the guidelines as indicated to contractor, to continue enhancing the distance learning program in preventing the spread and contamination of the coronavirus among professors and students by enabling remote distance education. The direct charges for this transaction to the federal award was for allowable costs under the instructions, federal grant and FAQs guidelines as indicated. 2. The institution does not concur with the auditor finding because of what is discussed in No 1 above. In the two cases mentioned, the cost quote may not agree with the invoice, because of some additional services requested, but the amount of the invoice was the correct amount paid and actual cost used to draw the HEERF funds. These invoices were for furniture and partitions divisions, to enable the remote distance education, avoiding physical contact of students and professors, to prevent, prepare for and respond to the COVID-19 emergency. Once again, these incurred and direct charges to the federal award complied with the HEERF objectives and were allowable costs under the authorized uses in the grant award and HEERF guidelines. 3. The institution does not concur with the auditor finding. The referenced three cases may not have a specific or expressed "acknowledgement of receipt" statement, but the acknowledgement was validated by UTC management and with the signatures when the check was issued. Nevertheless, the costs incurred in these invoices were authorized and incompliance with HEERF program and ESF purpose. The direct charges for this transaction to the federal award was for allowable costs under the instructions, federal grant and FAQs guidelines as indicated. 4. Institution does not, firmly, concurs with the auditor finding. This should not even be a finding because the institution strictly followed the FAQs published on March 19, 2021 to calculate the lost revenue and using a comparison between FY-20 and FY 21. That guideline described "Loss of Revenue" as "...those revenues and institution of higher education otherwise expected but were reduced or eliminated as a result of the novel coronavirus 2910 (COVID-2019) pandemic. As such, lost revenues can only be estimated". Nerveless, the result would have been relatively the same if we have use FY21 audited financials. Given the many factors and complexities of the unusual process, the institution followed a conservative approach and reduced those revenue items that have an increase between fiscal year from those with a loss of revenue. Therefore, the institution netted the potential amount of lost revenue to claim. Accordingly, the net amount resulted in $280,929.84. The potential loss of revenue amount could be greater but the institution decided to only claim the referenced estimated amount. These calculations and analysis were further discussed and evaluated by an officer of the Department of Education, with no recommendation on claiming a higher amount because the amount claimed was less than the estimated potential. The guideline indicates: "Reimbursement for lost revenue is allowable for the Institutional Portion program...". The institution claimed this loss of revenue amount from their institutional portion, complying with the HEERF guidelines and the authorized use of the funds. The direct charges for this transaction to the federal award was for allowable costs under the instructions, federal grant and FAQs guidelines as indicated. a. The institution used unaudited figures for FY21 because the audited financial statements were not completed at the time of the calculation. The institution revised the calculations with the audited financial statements, and the results were the same and the claimed estimated amount did not changed. Once again and in accordance with the guidelines, we were estimating the lost revenue with the data available at the moment. b. The institution followed the recommended HEERF guidelines for this complex and novel exercise. The institution considered under the analysis; those revenues otherwise expected but that were reduced as a result of the novel COVID-2019. The contributions as "Support Revenue" from related entities, which were a significant source of revenue for the institution, was not claimed as loss of revenue. The institution specifically claimed those lost revenue items as authorized in the guidelines. Therefore, once again, the UTC was in compliant with the lost revenue referenced guidelines. The direct charges for this transaction to the federal award was for allowable costs under the instructions, federal grant and FAQs guidelines as indicated. c. As explained above, the institution followed a conservative approach and only claimed a net amount of all lost revenue items. The institution only claimed those estimated revenue items, as authorized in the guideline, that suffer a loss between the two fiscal years considered in the evaluation. This was further evaluated by an officer of the DOE. As the guidelines described, since the lost revenues can only be estimated, the institution correctly, analyzed and calculated the best conservative/reasonable estimate of loss revenue with the available data at the moment. Even if we used the auditors' recommended items, the results would have been the same and no revenue item was claim out of the authorized or allowable costs from the guidelines. The direct charges for this transaction to the federal award was for allowable costs under the instructions, federal grant and FAQs guidelines as indicated. Actions Taken or Planned: The institution understands that the incurred and direct charges to the federal award complied with the HEERF objectives and were allowable costs under the authorized uses in the grant award and HEERF guidelines and no further was required.

Compliance requirement ? Reporting Institutional Comments on Findings and Recommendations: 1. The institution does not concur with the auditor finding because the institution strictly followed and used the recommended HEERF methodology and reporting guidelines to prepare the quarterly and annual reports. Since the institution used the reimbursement method, the drawdown were the actual expenditures/costs incurred and requested for reimbursement. The HEERF reporting requirement does not make any indication nor reference to GAAP. The Institutional aid portion expenditures were supported by the proper invoice or check. The evidence was available to the auditors. 2. The institution concurs with the auditor finding. The institution inadvertently, did not include a line item from one of the quarterly reports. The period to make corrections was closed and we sent an e-mail to the department to amend this annual report. 3. The institution concurs with the auditor finding. The annual report contains detail statistical information that not necessarily is supported by our institutions data base and programs. As the ED expressed, this information was unique and challenging, and accordingly, the institution made some reasonable estimates and derivatives in the information provided. As you may notice in the referenced table by the auditor, the differences were minimal. 4. a. The institution concurs with the auditor finding on the difference in Item #5 of the quarterly report. The institution will accordingly amend the report. b. The institution does not concur with the auditor finding on the timely and accurate reporting in publicly posting the quarterly Student Aid Portion. The four quarterly reports were timely submitted with an e-mail to the HEERF reporting staff and timely posted in the institution web page as required by the HEERF reporting instructions. The reports were further reviewed by an officer of the Department of Education (ED). The ED expressed that this information may be unique and challenging to an audit, and indicated that for these public reporting requirements, the auditors may accept as evidence of compliance, contemporarily produced e-mails, webmaster logs, or other relevant documentation establishing good-faith indication that the institution posted the required information at approximately the timelines established by the public reporting requirements. Copy of the e-mails were available to the auditors as evidence of compliance. ED understands that this information may be unique and challenging to audit, particularly because auditors are asked to verify information posted on a webpage which may not be accessible during audit fieldwork. For these public reporting requirements, auditors may accept as evidence of compliance, contemporarily produced emails, webmaster logs, or other relevant documentation establishing a good-faith indication that the institution posted the required information at approximately the timelines established by the public reporting requirements (HEERF Grant Program Auditing Requirements, General Requirements and Information - All HEERF Grantees). 5. The institution does not concur with the auditor finding because the referenced payment was made in accordance with the Institution's fund distribution and the student financial needs, among other factors, at the time of the evaluation and distribution of the funds. The student financial circumstances may have change after the distribution and payments of the financial aid. Additionally, this is an immaterial amount as compare to the total amount of the funds distributed ant the quantity of students served (1 out of 460). Actions Taken or Planned: The institution understands that no further is needed or required.

Compliance requirement ? Cash Management Institutional Comments on Findings and Recommendations: 1. The institution does concur with the auditor finding. The institution is revising the accounts' payable structure to ensure future payments falls within the allowed elapsed time. Actions Taken or Planned: The institution is revising the accounts' payable structure to ensure future payments falls within the allowed elapsed time.

1. The institution does not agree, nor concurs, with the auditors on this finding because the institution used the reimbursement payment method. This method was the preferred one when the non-federal entity, as our institution, cannot meet the requirements in 2 CFR, section 200.305(b)(1) for advance payment and the federal awarding agency sets a specific condition for use of the reimbursement. Title 2 of the CFR Part 200.305(b)(1), establish among others: "The non-Federal entity must be paid in advance, provided it maintains or demonstrates the willingness to maintain both written procedures that minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds and disbursement by the non-Federal entity, and financial management systems that meet the standards for fund control and accountability as established in this part". Furthermore, 2 CFR Part 200.305(b)(3) states: "Reimbursement is the preferred method when the requirements in this paragraph (b) cannot be met, when the Federal awarding agency sets a specific condition per ? 200.208, or when the non-Federal entity requests payment by reimbursement. " Since our institution was not able to meet 2 CFR, section 200.305(b)(1), and the HEERF guidelines has specific condition on how to use the funds; we choose the reimbursement method in the execution of the funds. Our institution adopted all HEERF instructions and guidelines as their policies to comply with the HEERF requirements, in addition to the CFR's regulations. Below some of the guidelines, instructions ad FAQs we adopted followed" a. Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund III, Frequently Asked Questions, American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, Published May 11, 2021, Questions 7 and 11 updated May 24, 2021, Question 36 updated September 30, 2021 b. US Department of Education, Notice of Proposed Institutional Eligibility Criteria, February 25, 2021 c. Federal Register Notice of Interpretation (NOI), regarding Period of Allowable Expenses for Funds Administered under HEERF Program, March 22, 2021 d. HEERF Notice of Interpretation for Period of Allowable HEERF Expenses (March 22, 2021) e. HEERF Lost Revenue FAQs (March 19, 2021) f. HEERF Period of Allowable Expenses Grant Records Notice (March 19, 2021) g. HEERF Grant Program Auditing Requirements (March 8, 2021) h. CRRSAA HEERF II Section 314(a)(1) Frequently Asked Questions (Published January 14, 2021 and Updated: March 19, 2021) i. CRRSAA HEERF II Section 314(a)(2) Frequently Asked Questions (January 14, 2021) j. CRRSAA HEERF II Section 314(a)(4) Frequently Asked Questions (Published January 14, 2021 and Updated: March 19, 2021) k. HEERF I and HEERF II Comparison Fact Sheet (Published January 14, 2021 and Updated: March 19, 2021) 1. HEERF Lost Revenue FAQ's, Published March 19, 2021 m. HEERF II, Public and Private Nonprofit Institution (a)(2) Programs (CFDAs 84.425K), FAQ's, Published January 14, 2021 n. HEERF II, Proprietary Institution Grant Funds for Students (CFDA 84.425Q) ((a)(4) Program), FAQ's Published January 14, 2021, Updated March 19, 2021. o. HEERF II, Public and Private Nonprofit Institution (a)(1) Programs (CFDA 84.425E and 84.425F), FAQ's Published January 14, 2021, Updated March 19, 2021. p. CAREST Act HEERF Rollup FAQs (issued October 14, 2020 and revised November 20, 2020) q. CARES Act HEERF Round 3 FAQs (Issued October 14, 2020 and revised November 20, 2020) r. CARES Act HEERF Supplemental FAQs (Issued June 30, 2020 and revised September 08, 2020) s. CARES Act HEERF Student FAQ's (Issued May 15, 2020) t. CARES Act HEERF Institutional Portion under Section 18004(a)(1) and 18004(c) FAQ's, (Issued April 9, 2020) u. CARES Act HEERF Emergency Financial Aid Grants to Students under Section 18004(a)(1) and 18004(c) FAQ's, (Issued April 9, 2020) v. CARES Act HEERF Institutional Portion under Section 18004(a)(1) and 18004(c) FAQ's, Issued April 9, 2020 w. COVID-19 FAQ's for Title III, IV, V and VII Grantees, June 16, 2020 x. COVID-19 Letter to HEP Grantees on Flexibilities Available Under CARES Act Section 3518, July 1, 2020 2. The institution does not agree, nor concurs, with the auditors on this finding because, as we mention in number 1 above, the institution adopted and followed the federal award and HEERF guidelines in the execution of the funds. The HEER funds were provided during the special national emergency caused by COVID-19. The DOE and HEERF officials issued many written guidelines, instructions, and FAQ's (Frequently Asked Questions) documents, due to the nature and novel of the national emergency situation. The institution adopted, followed, and relied on the many referenced guidelines and exercise extreme judgment to ensure compliance with the federal requirements and use of the funds. The institution belief this referenced guidelines and instruction were very specific and sufficient to execute the use of the funds. All direct charges to federal awards were for allowable costs under the guidelines and instructions from the Department of Education. Some of the allowable costs were verified and validated by an officer of the Department of Education and reviewed by an independent consultant. 3. The institution concurs with the auditor finding. Actions Taken or Planned: The institution begins in addition to the adopted HEERF guidelines, instructions, and CFRs; to develop additional procurement policies and are in the process of completing those policies. The institution expects to have those completed by May 31, 2023.

FINDING 2022-004 (Auditor Assigned Reference Number) Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Greg Hunt Contact Phone Number: (219) 362-7056 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: LaPorte Community School Corporation will review the Education Stabilization Fund schedule of disbursements more closely prior to submission. Anticipated Completion Date: May 15, 2023

Finding 2022-019 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.778 Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) Significant Deficiency and Internal Control Deficiency over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes Auditee?s Corrective Action Plan: BCHD will implement controls to maintain compliance with reporting requirements. BCHD will continue to work with the Department of Finance to ensure parameters for generating reports are the same and there is an agreed upon reconciliation when the parameters for reporting are not the same. Policies and procedures will be updated to ensure what is reported on Federal Financial Reports are reconciled to general ledger details in addition to ensuring all submitted reports have proper approvals documented. Accounting staff will be trained appropriately. Contact Person: Chief Financial Officer ? Unyime Ekpa Completion Date: December 2023

Finding 2022-017 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.767 Children?s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Significant Deficiency Over Reporting Repeat Finding: No Auditee?s Corrective Action Plan: BCHD will continue to work with the City's Finance department to ensure what is recorded on the general ledger reconciles to what is reported in the Form 440. The implementation of Workday Finance module should alleviate these findings. Contact Person: Chief Financial Officer ? Unyime Ekpa Completion Date: December 2023

Finding 2022-023 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Significant Deficiency in Compliance and Internal Control Over Reporting Repeat Finding: No Auditee?s Corrective Action Plan: BCHD will implement controls to maintain compliance with reporting requirements. BCHD will continue to work with the Department of Finance to ensure parameters for generating reports are the same and there is an agreed upon reconciliation when the parameters for reporting are not the same. Policies and procedures will be updated to ensure what is reported on 440 Reports are reconciled to general ledger details in addition to ensuring all submitted reports have proper approvals documented. Accounting staff will be trained appropriately. Contact Person: Chief Financial Officer ? Unyime Ekpa Completion Date: December 2023

COLEGIO LA MILAGROSA, INC. (A nonprofit organization) CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN JUNE 30, 2022 FINDING NO. CORRECTIVE ACTION COMPLETION DATE CONTACT PERSON 2022-001: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ? The Organization, Colegio La Milagrosa, hired a new employee. This employee is being trained to comply with the recommendations and apply them to the school year of 2021-2022. ? The Food Service area hired a new accounting company, LRR Services as of July 1, 2018 and implemented the recommendation provided by the company RRC CPA Group, PSC, and to comply with the financial processes required in the 2 CRF 200. ? Also, subsequent to June 30, 2022, an internal accountant was hired, who among other responsibilities, is coordinating and supervising the record keeping and compilation of interim and year end closing and reporting process. ? As part of our internal controls, the Food Service area has created an implemented an internal guide with procedures related for accounting processes (attached in this report). June 30th 2022 Liz M. Santiago/ Odette Y. Pacheco Torres / Lizzette Ruiz / Hector Rodriguez

Finding Reference Number: 2022-001 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Senior Services Program Name: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Assistance Listing Number: 93.558 Responsible Official: Megan Bania, Executive Director Views of Responsible Individuals: The Board of Directors had difficulty filling the position of Finance Director in May of 2022. They hired a firm at the end of May, but the firm received very little support in making the transition to handling the SkillUp program billing from the outgoing Finance Director. Other resignations in the Finance Department left MCAN with no institutional knowledge of the billing process. The existing SkillUp program manager was not responsible and not trained in the financial reporting and billing for the program. The Board has resolved the issue by hiring a new SkillUp program manager and a new executive director.

Lack of Purchase Order Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles We will make sure that we follow our SOP and that proper controls are in place to ensure the policies and procedures are being followed. We also have a new E.D. who checks and approves every purchase order. The proper controls are now in place.

ALN Number 17.225 ? Unemployment Insurance 2022-022 ? Strengthen Controls to Ensure Compliance with Reporting Requirements for Unemployment Insurance. Cat ? L, Finding Type, A, C2 (MW, IMNC) MDES Response: During the pandemic emergency, MDES relied upon the procedures encoded in ReEmployMS to generate the non-emergency tasks. Currently, the Policy and Compliance staff conduct random reviews and tests of both files and reports for accuracy validation using samples identified by the US DOL. The ReEmployMS system generates and stores flat files containing the specific individual records to create the ETA reports. When an error occurs in the generated reports, the staff receive alerts to review the data and reconcile the report. If the system does not generate an error, the information passes as accurate and verification occurs later upon the generation of test samples. Corrective Action Plan: After the relative subsidence of the COVID-19 crisis and review of our activities, MDES better appreciates the value of ensuring that appropriate staff review reports and of maintaining documentation for each examination. Moreover, MDES currently has procedures in place to ensure the review of all reports and to document such activities.

Corrective Action Purchased orders will be prepared with the correct accounting code to reflect expenditures in the right budget line items. Person(s) Responsible Shontell McQueen, Finance Coordinator; Leslie Baynes,Chief Finance Office; Bima Baje, School Business Administrator Planned Completion Date As of July 2022, corrective action has been implemented.

2022-003 Compliance and Internal Controls over Allowable Costs and Earmarking (Significant Deficiency) Assistance Listing Number 64.033 VA Supportive Services for Veteran Families, A Supportive Services for Veteran Families ? Shallow Subsidy, and COVID ? 19 VA Supportive Services for Veteran Families 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 Funding U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs Recommendation: The Agency should establish and follow an allowable indirect allocation policy based on identifiable measures. The indirect costs charged to the grant can be substantiated by actual costs incurred. Corrective Action: Management will ensure the indirect allocation policy is correct, and actual and allowable costs will substantiate the indirect charge to grants. Responsible Party: Controller and Chief Operating Officer Date Expected to be Corrected: Immediately

FINDING NUMBER: 2022-002 Condition: The Organization is either lacking or has non-conforming written policies and procedures for the following administrative functions, required by the Uniform Guidance: 1. Financial Management - 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) 2. Allowable Costs - 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) 3. Federal payment - 2 CFR 200.305(b)(1) 4. Procurement - 2 CFR 200.318(a) and 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) 5. Competition - 2 CFR 200.319(d) 5. Competition ? 2 CFR 200.319(d) 6. Methods of procurement to be followed - 2 CFR 200.320 7. Compensation (Personal Services) - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(1) 8. Compensation (Fringe Benefits - Leave) - 2 CFR 200.431(b)(1) 9. Relocation costs of employees - 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) 10. Travel costs - 2 CFR 200.474 Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding and plans to review Uniform Guidance, modify and create policies and procedures where necessary to meet administrative Uniform Guidance requirements. The adopted policies and procedures will be reviewed and approved by the School Board of Directors at the organization?s next scheduled Board meeting. School Representative Responsible for Corrective Action: Carlos Perez, Executive Director Anticipated Completion Date: June 14, 2023

Identifying Number: 2022-002 Finding: The following discrepancies and inconsistencies were identified: administrative procedures and requirements of the grantor were not followed; there were no proper review or approval of required reporting prior to submission. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Kevyn Harmon, Senior Director of Finance & Administration Corrective Action: All personnel involved with the Title programs undergo training on the all the processes and requirements to administer the programs, and management will perform proper review of all claims for reimbursement. In additional, an annual update on the procedures and the requirements to ensure propriety and accuracy. Proposed Completion Date: EPIC Academy will complete implementation of the above procedures by November 30, 2022.

The Municipality will proceed to train the Section 8 program personnel so that they can record all the transactions through the system in order to maintain complete and accurate accounting record.

FINDING 2022-002 Finding Subject: Child Support Enforcement - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Summary of Finding: An effective internal control system was not in place at the County to ensure compliance with the requirements related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. The payment of the Deputy Court Clerk?s wages and benefits out of the Clerk?s Incentive Fund supplanted not supplemented the employee?s salary which is unallowable. Contractual payment did not match the amount stated in the contract. The County did not have an allowable cost policy. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: James W. Bramble Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 812-462-3361 james.bramble@vigocounty.in.gov Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: Internal control procedures will be evaluated to determine needed changes to correct the above noted compliance requirements over Child Support. Changes will be made to the 2024 budget to correct the payroll related issue so the Clerk?s Incentive Fund. Contracts will be reviewed to ensure the contract amounts are current. The County will develop an allowable cost policy. Anticipated Completion Date: January 1, 2024

All federal Project and Expenditure reports were filed timely and all actual expenditures were also reported correctly according to the report overview page. This finding deals with the body of the report which incorrectly listed the Justice Center Project twice, with the obligation amount of $880,00 listed for the project. This duplicated project has been removed from future reports. The finding noted for $175,741, once again has all the correct totals in project overview report, which should be the summation of the report. We have been rehiring staff with American Rescue Plan funds since 2021, and this has been an ongoing project. Once again, the report overview page lists the correct expenditures, however the body of the report has the project listed twice. This duplicated project has been removed from future reports. The reporting software gives a total of expenditures before you hit submit on each report, this total has always displayed the correct cumulative expenditure total. If projects were entered twice, the total expenditures should of been over by these dollar amounts, and they were not.

#2022-002: Material Weakness in Controls over Compliance: Administrative Requirements of Uniform Guidance -Administrative Policies Recommendations: Grand Rapids Christian Schools should consider the following written policy additions or updates: ? Financial Management (2 CFR 200.302) The financial management policy should include records documenting compliance, and the tracking of funds to determine that expenditures are in accordance with the terms and conditions of the federal awards. The financial management and reporting system must provide the following : ? Identification - Title of the award, CFDA number ? Complete disclosure of accurate and current financial results of each federal award ? Source and application of funds for federal award activity ? Record retention and access - define the time period for which records must be kept (can vary by grant agreement), and who has the ability access the records (?200.333 - ?200.337) ? Written procedure to implement cash management requirements (see below) ? Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs (see below) ? Cash Management (2 CFR 200.305) A written policy is required by Uniform Guidance detailing the Organization's procedures to minimize the time that elapses between draw and expenditure of federal dollars. ? Allowable Costs (2 CFR 200.302(b)(7)) The Organization must have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E - Cost Principles of Uniform Guidance and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. This includes the determination of allowable costs and the review of this determination. The standard assumes policies and procedures are in place for disbursements, and the allowable cost policy will demonstrate how the Organization ensures compliance. The criteria for costs to be considered allowable are documented within 2 CFR 200.403. ? Procurement Standards (2 CFR 200.317 - 200.326) The Organization must have a written policy that promotes full and open vendor competition, conflict of interest policies should cover employees as well as the organization, and general purchase requirements with specific thresholds as set forth by the Uniform Guidance. There are five allowable procurement methods as described in ?200.320, depending upon the dollar value of the purchase or contract. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: ? Grand Rapids Christian Schools follows procurement and record retention standards provided by the USDA. ? GRCS does not have actual written policies and procedures for Financial Management, Cash Management, Allowable Costs, and Procurement Standards, but do have practices in place to follow USDA guidelines. In the case of cash management, the only location that takes cash is GRCHS. In that instance, along with Meal Magic, cash registers are zeroed out and balanced to Meal Magic and cash deposits are made daily. ? GRCS Business Office will work with the Food Service Director to begin formulating written policies and procedures specific to Grand Rapids Christian Schools. GRCS will utilize the resources from Uniform Guidance and Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to develop policies that are compliant with those requirements prior to June 30, 2023.

FINDING 2022-001: THE CITY OF CULLMAN, ALABAMA WILL DEVELOP A GRANTS MANUAL OR WRITTEN POLICIES TO INCORPORATE ALL REQUIREMENTS OF 2 CFR 200 AND ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH GRANT REQUIREMENTS.