Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
59,889
In database
Filtered Results
481
Matching current filters
Showing Page
7 of 20
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: § 200.1
FINDING 2024-012 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Ed...
FINDING 2024-012 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-027-PN01, 22611-027-ARP, 22619-027- ARP, 23611-027-PN01, 23619-027-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Beth Husband/Alexandria Eckert Contact Phone Number 260-356-8312 Email Address: bhusband@hccsc.k12.in.us/aeckert@hccsc.k12.in.us Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding Description of Corrective Action Plan: All future expenditures triggering procurement and suspension and debarment requirements will include implementing the following procurement policies: Reference Procurement Standards 2 CFR 200.318 Districts may not enter into contracts with entities that have been suspended or debarred from participating in contracts with federal funds. For contracts over $25,000, districts must verify a contractor is not excluded or disqualified. Contractors must be verified in one of three ways: 1. Checking the System for Award Management (SAM) (www.SAM.gov) 2. Collecting a certificate from that contractor. 3. Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that contractor. (Recommended) **Proper verification and documentation must be sent to the LEA for audit purposes. Methods of Procurement Where specific EDGAR/UG thresholds apply, Districts must meet baseline requirements for procurement. If State or local rules have more restrictive thresholds, the most restrictive rule must be followed. Anticipated Completion Date: All expenditures initiated after March 26, 2025
Finding Number: 2024-003 Equipment Property Management Recommendation: The University needs to enhance the precision of the controls over equipment purchases to ensure that a property record is created within the system containing the required information for all federally funded equipment. Manage...
Finding Number: 2024-003 Equipment Property Management Recommendation: The University needs to enhance the precision of the controls over equipment purchases to ensure that a property record is created within the system containing the required information for all federally funded equipment. Management concurs with the auditor’s recommendation. The University has taken immediate steps to comply with 2 CFR 200.313 and is in process of implementing the following actions: Planned Corrective Action (1): The University is incorporating an additional worktag into the procurement approval workflow for asset management, enabling the identification of asset purchase orders and ensuring their proper routing to the Asset Management team for asset record creation. Anticipated Completion Date: May 2025 Responsible Contact Person: Eric Hughey, Fiscal Manager, Asset Accounting & Surplus/Nataliya Samodov, GCA Director Planned Corrective Action (2): The University will be implementing Multi-book functionality in the Workday ERP to improve asset management including creation of multiple asset books to meet different accounting standards as well as tracking of the assets from acquisition to disposal. This implementation will provide active monitoring of assets to ensure compliance. Anticipated Completion Date: Fall 2025 Responsible Contact Person: Eric Hughey, Fiscal Manager, Asset Accounting & Surplus/Nataliya Samodov, GCA Director
FINDING 2024-005 Finding Subject: SPECIAL EDUCATION CLUSTER (IDEA) – PROCUREMENT AND SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT Summary of Finding: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to...
FINDING 2024-005 Finding Subject: SPECIAL EDUCATION CLUSTER (IDEA) – PROCUREMENT AND SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT Summary of Finding: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States; Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027; 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-042-ARP; 22619-042-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement(s): Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Dawn Mason, Business Manager, DeKalb Co. Eastern CSD Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 260-868-2125; Andrew McDaniel, Chief Financial and Operations Officer, West Noble School Corporation, 260-894-3191, mcdaniela@westnoble.k12.in.us Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the findings. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The expenditures referenced in the finding were expended from the American Rescue Plan Special Education grant funds which were fully expended during the audit period. All future expenditures triggering procurement and suspension and debarment requirements will include implementing the following procurement policies. Reference Procurement Standards 2 CFR 200.318 Districts may not enter into contracts with entities that have been suspended or debarred from participating in contracts with federal funds. For contracts over $25,000, districts must verify a contractor is not excluded or disqualified. Contractors must be verified in one of three ways: 1. Checking the System for Award Management (SAM) (www.SAM.gov) 2. Collecting a certificate from that contractor. 3. Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that contractor. (Recommended) **Proper verification and documentation must be sent to the LEA for audit purposes. Methods of Procurement Where specific EDGAR/UG thresholds apply, Districts must meet baseline requirements for procurement. If State or local rules have more restrictive thresholds, the most restrictive rule must be followed. Informal Procurement Procedures 1. Micro-purchase (0-$50,000) Dekalb County Eastern CSD has self-certified micro-purchases for up to $50,000 Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotes if the district considers the price to be reasonable. Quotes must be attached to the invoice/checks for proper documentation and retained by the LEA. 2. Small Purchase ($50,000 – $150,000) Three quotes are required prior to purchase unless the purchase comes from a “Sole Source” vendor. Small purchases are required to be ordered under a purchase order unless in an emergency. Additional quotes must be presented along with the purchase order prior to being approved by the LEA. Formal Procurement Procedures 1. Sealed Bids (above $150,000) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of suppliers, providing them with sufficient response time prior to the opening of the bids. Proper advertisement and procedures must be followed per IC 5-22 and corresponding documentation must be presented to the LEA prior to any final approval or purchases being made. 2. Competitive Proposals (above $150,000) The Request for Proposal method is used for procurements in which factors other than cost play a significant role. Per IC 5-22-9, when a purchasing agent makes a written determination that the use of competitive sealed bidding is either not practicable or not advantageous to the governmental body, the purchasing agent may award a contract using this procedure instead of competitive sealed bidding. This provides a formal process for the procurement of goods and/or services for which price is not the sole factor in the selection of a vendor or vendors. Proper advertisement and procedures must be followed per IC 5-22 and corresponding documentation must be presented to the LEA prior to any final approval or purchases being made. Noncompetitive (Sole Source) All sole source procurements require adequate written justification and must be attached to the corresponding purchase order or payment. Anticipated Completion Date: All expenditures initiated after March 12, 2025
COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO MUNICIPALITY OF CATAÑO Corrective Action Plan For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2024 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Audit Report: Reports on Compliance and Internal Control in Accorda...
COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO MUNICIPALITY OF CATAÑO Corrective Action Plan For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2024 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Audit Report: Reports on Compliance and Internal Control in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards and OMB Super Circular Uniform Guidance Audit Period: July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 Fiscal Year: 2023-2024 Principal Executive: Hon. Julio Alicea Vasallo, Mayor Contact Person: Mrs. Honoris Machado, Interim Finance Director Phone: (787) 788-0404 Original Finding Number: 2024-003 Statement of Concurrence or Nonconcurrence: We concur with the finding. Corrective Action: Objective of the plan: The objective of this Corrective Action Plan is to address the observations identified in the audit and establish preventive measures to avoid future recurrences. Corrective Actions: 1. Schedule restructuring: • Create a detailed calendar with clear dates to define intermediate delivery deadlines to avoid delays (collection of information, analysis, writing, review, and submission) 2. Implementation of alerts and reminders: • Set up automatic alerts and email reminders for key dates (for example, 3 days before each deadline) 3. Review and Quality Control: Establish an internal review of reports before final submission to ensure that the information reported is accurate and complete. The revision includes compliance with the requirements established by the agency. Compliance Monitoring: • Biweekly meetings: The team will have biweekly meetings to have updates regarding the progress and achievement of the deadlines. • Email notifications: Emails will be sent to document the timely submission of reports and when needed, waivers will be requested explaining situations that may have delayed the process to prepare accurate and complete reports on time. Evaluation: • Monthly evaluations will be performed to measure the compliance of the submission of the reports on the timeframe established by the agency. • Adjustments to the processes according to the response of the team. Implementation Date: March 2025 Responsible persons: • Person responsible for the implementation: Mr. Carlos Flores, Federal Program’s Subdirector • Person responsible for the supervision: Mrs. Yolanda Maldonado, Federal Program’s Director
Finding 2024-003 Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Brenda Layne, Food Service Director Contact Phone Number: 765-289-7323 We concur with the finding. Corrective Action plan: As of 3/1/25. Cindy will look the company up on Sam.gov. and the Food Service Director will look ...
Finding 2024-003 Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Brenda Layne, Food Service Director Contact Phone Number: 765-289-7323 We concur with the finding. Corrective Action plan: As of 3/1/25. Cindy will look the company up on Sam.gov. and the Food Service Director will look it over and both of us will initial and keep a copy on file. Anticipated Completion Date: March 2025
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Fed...
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-042-ARP, 22619-042-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF STEUBEN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Northeast Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the procurement and the suspension and debarment requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the requirements for the simplified acquisition threshold and for small purchases were met for each applicable procured good or service or to ensure that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a covered transaction. Procurement When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required. The SAT is typically set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold. Therefore, the SAT threshold is set at $150,000. Formal procurement methods require adherence to documented procedures and formal methods such as sealed bids or proposals. When the purchase value exceeds the micro-purchase threshold but is less than the simplified acquisition threshold, a small purchase occurs. Small purchases require documented full and open competition or a documented rationale for limited competition. For 2022-2023, the Cooperative had one vendor, with disbursements, totaling $379,313, which exceeded the SAT threshold of $150,000. The Cooperative did not obtain sealed bids or competitive proposals nor was there documentation detailing the history of the procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. For 2022-2023, the Cooperative had one vendor with disbursements in the amount of $55,374, which were less than the SAT threshold of $150,000, but exceeded the $50,000 micropurchase threshold and was selected for testing. The Cooperative did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of the procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. For 2023-2024, three vendors with disbursements, totaling $175,125, were identified as being less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeding the $50,000 micropurchase threshold and were selected for testing. The Cooperative did not obtain price or rate quotes for two of the three vendors and there was no documentation detailing the history of the procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to contracts, for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF STEUBEN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Upon inquiry of the Cooperative in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the Cooperative disclosed there were not any documented internal controls or procedures. Nine covered transactions were identified. The covered transactions, totaling $803,836, were selected for testing. The Cooperative did not verify the suspension and debarment status of the tested vendors prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases– (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF STEUBEN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (b) Formal Procurement Methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: . . . (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. . . . (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The Cooperative noted that the ARP portion of the Special Education grant was new for 2022-2023 and 2023-2024. The ARP funding gave opportunity for types of expenditures that do not typically get expensed using special education funding. The transactions noted within the Condition and Context were from the ARP portion of the grant, which provided property or services that exceeded the micro-purchase threshold. Management of the Cooperative was unaware of the procurement requirements when property or services exceed the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, management of the Cooperative was unaware of the suspension and debarment requirements when a covered transaction is expected to equal or exceed $25,000. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. Without following the required methods for procurement, the Cooperative could be overpaying for services. Unverified vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 could be suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF STEUBEN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the reduction of future federal funding to the Cooperative. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the Cooperative's management design and implement a system of internal controls related to procurement and suspension and debarment procedures to ensure procurement requirements are met and to ensure entities are neither suspended nor debarred or otherwise excluded or disqualified prior to entering into any covered transactions. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 (Auditor Assigned Reference Number) Finding Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA)- Period of Performance Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Julie Remschneider Contact Phone Number and Email Address: julie.r@nn.k12.in.us, 219-285-2228 Views of Responsible Officials...
FINDING 2024-005 (Auditor Assigned Reference Number) Finding Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA)- Period of Performance Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Julie Remschneider Contact Phone Number and Email Address: julie.r@nn.k12.in.us, 219-285-2228 Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: We will ensure the Special Education Co-op will have controls in place to make sure payments are made within the period of performance. Anticipated Completion Date: September 30, 2025
DSHA will implement a policy and procedure requiring the retention of reporting backup data to be retained with the submitted report.  Additionally, DSHA will require that the review of the submitted report be documented and that any identified report discrepancies be noted and retained with the sub...
DSHA will implement a policy and procedure requiring the retention of reporting backup data to be retained with the submitted report.  Additionally, DSHA will require that the review of the submitted report be documented and that any identified report discrepancies be noted and retained with the submitted report.
The County Commission will ensure all expenditures are properly reported to the governing entity during the proper reporting period.
The County Commission will ensure all expenditures are properly reported to the governing entity during the proper reporting period.
FINDING 2024-004 Finding Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Period of Performance Summary of Finding: During fiscal year 2023-24, the School Corporation was part of Cooperative School Services, which managed special education programs and federal funds for member schools. Funds for Special Ed...
FINDING 2024-004 Finding Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Period of Performance Summary of Finding: During fiscal year 2023-24, the School Corporation was part of Cooperative School Services, which managed special education programs and federal funds for member schools. Funds for Special Education needed to be obligated by September 30, 2023. Three exceptions occurred with late obligations. It is recommended that the School Corporation create internal controls to prevent late costs and ensure compliance. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Chris Richie Business Manager/Treasurer Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 219 987 4711, crichie@kv.k12.in.us Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The school corporation will work with Cooperative School Services to ensure that funds are obligated prior to the grant obligation deadline. Anticipated Completion Date: June 1, 2025
Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Iden...
Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): H027A220084, H027A230084 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Context: The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for one out of four vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. Documentation of vendor contract, bids or the School Corporation's process and rationale for the chosen vendor was not available for audit. Further, the School Corporation could not provide evidence that a suspension and debarment check had been performed on the vendor prior to entering into contract. Corrective Action Plan: The Special Education Director will obtain pricing quotes from the appropriate amount of qualified sources, when cumulative costs are projected to exceed the micro purchase threshold. The Special Education Director will document and communicate the results of this process with the Business Manager and Superintendent. Person responsible for implementation and projected implementation date: The Special Education Director, the Business Manager, and the Superintendent will be responsible for overseeing the implementation of the corrective action plan, which will go into effect immediately.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN State Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2024 10.553/10.555/10.556/10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster State Agency: Education Department Audit Contact: Lindsey Labonville Title: Administrator IV Telephone: 603.731.4621 E-mail address: Lindsey.L.Labonville@doe.nh.gov Audit Report Refer...
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN State Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2024 10.553/10.555/10.556/10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster State Agency: Education Department Audit Contact: Lindsey Labonville Title: Administrator IV Telephone: 603.731.4621 E-mail address: Lindsey.L.Labonville@doe.nh.gov Audit Report Reference: 2024-002 - Child Nutrition Cluster Finding Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2025 Corrective Action Planned: The NHED concurs with this finding. NHED contacted the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) for information on FFATA reporting requirements for state education agencies. The contact at USDA, Suzanne Dagesse, responded on February 6, 2024, that they were not aware of the requirement, and that this requirement has never been communicated to the NHED Office of Food & Nutrition Programs, by USDA. NHED has had annual reviews conducted by USDA of the programs administered and this requirement has never been communicated. NHED will add the food and nutrition programs to the established FFATA process already implemented to ensure that amounts to subrecipients are tracked and that all first tier subawards of $30,000 or more are reported in accordance with FFATA.
Finding Reference: 2024-011 - Program Income, Ryan White (UMMC) Responsible Official: Mustafa Khawaja, Interim Director of Post-Award Corrective Action Planned: Based on feedback received from a Sponsor-led site visit in 2024, UMMC practices and policies are appropriately aligned with the intent of ...
Finding Reference: 2024-011 - Program Income, Ryan White (UMMC) Responsible Official: Mustafa Khawaja, Interim Director of Post-Award Corrective Action Planned: Based on feedback received from a Sponsor-led site visit in 2024, UMMC practices and policies are appropriately aligned with the intent of the program. UMMC will make efforts to ensure that all practices and policies are clearly documented and evaluated periodically. Estimated Completion Date: June 30, 2025
Wisconsin Department of Health Services Planned Corrective Action: Summer EBT was a brand-new program started in summer 2024 to provide food benefits during the summer months to families with children who were determined eligible for free or reduced-price school meals in the prior school year or dur...
Wisconsin Department of Health Services Planned Corrective Action: Summer EBT was a brand-new program started in summer 2024 to provide food benefits during the summer months to families with children who were determined eligible for free or reduced-price school meals in the prior school year or during the summer. DHS provided benefits to over 450,000 children. While DHS agrees with the cash management concerns cited by LAB under this program, we need to clarify that the questioned costs do not represent inappropriate federal spending. While the federal funds were received too early and remained in a bank account as of June 30, 2024, most of the funds were paid out to eligible children during the following three months. A reconciliation of funds received to funds spent for the children in this program was completed in early SFY 2024-25, with any unspent balance returned to the federal government in September 2024. DHS will work with DOA and our Summer EBT third-party vendor to improve the payment process, ensuring compliance with federal requirements for future years. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2025Person responsible for corrective action: Rebecca Mogensen, Section Chief Managerial Accounting, Bureau of Fiscal Services, Division of Enterprise Services rebeccaj.mogensen@dhs.wisconsin.gov Rebuttal from the Wisconsin Legislative Audit Bureau In its corrective action plan on page 345, the Department of Health Services agreed with the cash management concerns reported by the Bureau, but stated it did not consider the questioned costs to be inappropriate federal spending. In addition, the Department of Health Services noted that it completed a reconciliation of funds received to funds spent for children in this program and returned the unspent balance to the federal government in September 2024. However, a questioned cost is defined by 2 CFR s. 200.1 as an amount expended or received from a federal award, that in the auditor’s judgment:  is noncompliant or suspected noncompliant with federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of the federal award;  lacked adequate documentation to support compliance; or  appeared unreasonable and did not reflect the actions a prudent person would take in the circumstances. As reported in the finding, United States Department of Agriculture guidance indicates that expenditures or disbursements under the Summer Electronic Benefit Transfer Program for Children are incurred when participants have used the issued benefits to purchase food. The amount questioned was the balance of the federal funds drawn and not spent by participants as of June 30, 2024. This amount met the criteria of a questioned cost due to noncompliance with federal regulations and a lack of adequate documentation to support compliance. In addition, the return of $14.2 million to the federal government in September 2024 further indicates that the amounts drawn in June 2024 were not supported.
View Audit 349896 Questioned Costs: $1
The Organization will update its subrecipient monitoring policies to ensure all required elements as defined in 2 CFR § 200.332 (a)(1) are included in subrecipient agreements, Additionally, a checklist will be established to perform a risk assessment process to evaluate subrecipient risk prior to co...
The Organization will update its subrecipient monitoring policies to ensure all required elements as defined in 2 CFR § 200.332 (a)(1) are included in subrecipient agreements, Additionally, a checklist will be established to perform a risk assessment process to evaluate subrecipient risk prior to contract execution and annually thereafter and to verify each subrecipient’s that meets the audit threshold and if required has a current Single Audit on file or is otherwise in compliance.
View Audit 349874 Questioned Costs: $1
The University will implement an additional level of review within the Finance Department over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards in order to ensure accuracy and completeness of the schedule. In addition, there will be inclusion of the Office of Grants and Sponsored Projects in the prep...
The University will implement an additional level of review within the Finance Department over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards in order to ensure accuracy and completeness of the schedule. In addition, there will be inclusion of the Office of Grants and Sponsored Projects in the preparation and review of the schedule. The University is also looking into the implementation of software for award management to help avoid future oversights.
The District will discuss the results of this audit with our ESC to establish protocols and receive copies of their annual audit reports for review.
The District will discuss the results of this audit with our ESC to establish protocols and receive copies of their annual audit reports for review.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN - Recognizing the need/requirement to maintain property records appropriately, the district is working to schedule/complete a comprehensive physical inventory that should assist in identifying the location of equipment funded by the Education Stabilization Fund (ESF), resultin...
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN - Recognizing the need/requirement to maintain property records appropriately, the district is working to schedule/complete a comprehensive physical inventory that should assist in identifying the location of equipment funded by the Education Stabilization Fund (ESF), resulting in questioned costs of $2,186,066 per this finding (in addition to all other equipment carried by the district regardless of funding source). The district plans are to continue to work with NEFEC to enact property records within Skyward to capture accurate information and a base starting point per completion of a physical inventory. All property records will then be maintained in Skyward to capture all information required under Federal funding provisions and a reconciliation to physical inventory counts will be prepared no less than every 2 years. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2025 Responsible Contact Person: Walter Copeland, Interim CFO
View Audit 349482 Questioned Costs: $1
FINDING 2024-001 Finding Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Summary of Finding: Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States; COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings...
FINDING 2024-001 Finding Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Summary of Finding: Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States; COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027; 84.173 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-042-ARP; 22619-042-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement(s): Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Dawn Mason, Business Manager, DeKalb Co. Eastern CSD Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 260-868-2125; dmason@dkeschools.com Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the findings. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The expenditures referenced in the finding were expended from the American Rescue Plan Special Education grant funds which were fully expended during the audit period. All future expenditures triggering procurement and suspension and debarment requirements will include implementing the following procurement policies. Reference Procurement Standards 2 CFR 200.318 Districts may not enter into contracts with entities that have been suspended or debarred from participating in contracts with federal funds. For contracts over $25,000, districts must verify a contractor is not excluded or disqualified. Contractors must be verified in one of three ways: 1. Checking the System for Award Management (SAM) (www.SAM.gov) 2. Collecting a certificate from that contractor. 3. Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that contractor. (Recommended) **Proper verification and documentation must be sent to the LEA for audit purposes. Methods of Procurement Where specific EDGAR/UG thresholds apply, Districts must meet baseline requirements for procurement. If State or local rules have more restrictive thresholds, the most restrictive rule must be followed. E INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 Informal Procurement Procedures 1. Micro-purchase (0-$50,000) Dekalb County Eastern CSD has self-certified micro-purchases for up to $50,000 Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotes if the district considers the price to be reasonable. Quotes must be attached to the invoice/checks for proper documentation and retained by the LEA. 2. Small Purchase ($50,000 – $150,000) Three quotes are required prior to purchase unless the purchase comes from a “Sole Source” vendor. Small purchases are required to be ordered under a purchase order unless in an emergency. Additional quotes must be presented along with the purchase order prior to being approved by the LEA. Formal Procurement Procedures 1. Sealed Bids (above $150,000) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of suppliers, providing them with sufficient response time prior to the opening of the bids. Proper advertisement and procedures must be followed per IC 5-22 and corresponding documentation must be presented to the LEA prior to any final approval or purchases being made. 2. Competitive Proposals (above $150,000) The Request for Proposal method is used for procurements in which factors other than cost play a significant role. Per IC 5-22-9, when a purchasing agent makes a written determination that the use of competitive sealed bidding is either not practicable or not advantageous to the governmental body, the purchasing agent may award a contract using this procedure instead of competitive sealed bidding. This provides a formal process for the procurement of goods and/or services for which price is not the sole factor in the selection of a vendor or vendors. Proper advertisement and procedures must be followed per IC 5-22 and corresponding documentation must be presented to the LEA prior to any final approval or purchases being made. Noncompetitive (Sole Source) All sole source procurements require adequate written justification and must be attached to the corresponding purchase order or payment. Anticipated Completion Date: All expenditures initiated after March 12, 2025
FINDING 2024-003 Finding Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Bethany Cmar Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 765-641-2126 (Bcmar@acsc.net) Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the findin...
FINDING 2024-003 Finding Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Bethany Cmar Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 765-641-2126 (Bcmar@acsc.net) Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: When it comes to procurements thresholds, ACS will prepare a policy to follow the necessary federal guidelines. For small purchases, three quotes or bids will be obtained to ensure compliance with the procurement guidelines. For all vendors expected to exceed over $25,000 in expenditures will be kept in a binder by the Special Ed Director to ensure that they are not suspended or debarred from federal awards. The CFO will then review and approve the documentation supporting this via signature. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2025
FINDING 2024-007 (Section III-Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs) Finding Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Dawn Mason, Business Manager, DeKalb Co. Eastern CSD Contact Phone Number and Emai...
FINDING 2024-007 (Section III-Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs) Finding Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Dawn Mason, Business Manager, DeKalb Co. Eastern CSD Contact Phone Number and Email Address: 260-868-2125; dmason@dkeschools.com Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the findings. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The expenditures referenced in the finding were expended from the American Rescue Plan Special Education grant funds which were fully expended during the audit period. All future expenditures triggering procurement and suspension and debarment requirements will include implementing the following procurement policies. Reference Procurement Standards 2 CFR 200.318 Districts may not enter into contracts with entities that have been suspended or debarred from participating in contracts with federal funds. For contracts over $25,000, districts must verify a contractor is not excluded or disqualified. Contractors must be verified in one of three ways: 1. Checking the System for Award Management (SAM) (www.SAM.gov) 2. Collecting a certificate from that contractor. 3. Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that contractor. (Recommended) **Proper verification and documentation must be sent to the LEA for audit purposes. Methods of Procurement Where specific EDGAR/UG thresholds apply, Districts must meet baseline requirements for procurement. If State or local rules have more restrictive thresholds, the most restrictive rule must be followed. Informal Procurement Procedures 1. Micro-purchase (0-$50,000) Dekalb County Eastern CSD has self-certified micro-purchases for up to $50,000 Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotes if the district considers the price to be reasonable. Quotes must be attached to the invoice/checks for proper documentation and retained by the LEA. 2. Small Purchase ($50,000 – $150,000) Three quotes are required prior to purchase unless the purchase comes from a “Sole Source” vendor. Small purchases are required to be ordered under a purchase order unless in an emergency. Additional quotes must be presented along with the purchase order prior to being approved by the LEA. Per Uniform Guidance: 2 CFR § 200.511(a) – “The auditee is responsible for follow-up and corrective action on all audit findings. . .The auditee must also prepare a corrective action plan for current year audit findings. . . The corrective action plan and summary schedule of prior audit findings must include findings relating to the financial statements which are required to be reported in accordance with GAGAS. ” 2 CFR § 200.511(c) – “At the completion of the audit, the auditee must prepare, in a document separate from the auditor's findings described in § 200.516, a corrective action plan to address each audit finding included in the current year auditor's reports. The corrective action plan must provide the name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action, the corrective action planned, and the anticipated completion date. If the auditee does not agree with the audit findings or believes corrective action is not required, then the corrective action plan must include an explanation and specific reasons.” Formal Procurement Procedures 1. Sealed Bids (above $150,000) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of suppliers, providing them with sufficient response time prior to the opening of the bids. Proper advertisement and procedures must be followed per IC 5-22 and corresponding documentation must be presented to the LEA prior to any final approval or purchases being made. 2. Competitive Proposals (above $150,000) The Request for Proposal method is used for procurements in which factors other than cost play a significant role. Per IC 5-22-9, when a purchasing agent makes a written determination that the use of competitive sealed bidding is either not practicable or not advantageous to the governmental body, the purchasing agent may award a contract using this procedure instead of competitive sealed bidding. This provides a formal process for the procurement of goods and/or services for which price is not the sole factor in the selection of a vendor or vendors. Proper advertisement and procedures must be followed per IC 5-22 and corresponding documentation must be presented to the LEA prior to any final approval or purchases being made. Noncompetitive (Sole Source) All sole source procurements require adequate written justification and must be attached to the corresponding purchase order or payment. Anticipated Completion Date: All expenditures initiated after March 12, 2025
FA 2024-001 Strengthen Controls over Transfers Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principle Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: G...
FA 2024-001 Strengthen Controls over Transfers Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principle Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education Assistance Listing Number and Title: 10.553 - School Breakfast Program 10.555 - National School Lunch Program COVID-19-10.555 - National School Lunch Program Federal Award Number: 245GA324N1199 (Year: 2024), 225GA324N1099 (Year: 2024) Questioned Costs: $803,845.92 Prior Year Finding: None Identified Description: The polices and procedures of the School District were insufficient to provide adequate internal controls over transfers of Child Nutrition Cluster funds. Corrective Action Plans: The School District will review current internal control procedures related to School Nutrition Fund transfers. Development and/or modification of current policies and procedures will be determined as needed to ensure that all expenditures, including transfers, are used for allowable purposes. In addition, the School District will implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditure activity is compliant with the School District's policies and procedures. Estimated Completion Date: June 30, 2025 Contact Person: Debbie Woerner, Finance Director/Asst Superintendent Telephone: 770-567-8489 ext. 1030 Email: woerned@pike.k12.ga.us
View Audit 349220 Questioned Costs: $1
FINDING 2024-003 Finding Subject: Special Education Cluster – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Marcia Fullenkamp, Treasurer Contact Phone Number and Email Address: (812) 623-2212; mfullenkamp@rodspecialed.org Views of Responsible Officials: W...
FINDING 2024-003 Finding Subject: Special Education Cluster – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Marcia Fullenkamp, Treasurer Contact Phone Number and Email Address: (812) 623-2212; mfullenkamp@rodspecialed.org Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The ROD Special Education Cooperative will make notes in the Board Minutes regarding the fact that only one vendor can provide specific services prior to entering into a contract or purchasing said services. Each company providing services will be checked on the SAM.gov website to ensure that the vendor has not been suspended or debarred. Anticipated Completion Date: February 1, 2024
FINDING 2024-005 (Auditor Assigned Reference Number) Finding Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA)- Period of Performance Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Julie Remschneider Contact Phone Number and Email Address: julie.r@nn.k12.in.us, 219-285-2228 Views of Responsible Officials...
FINDING 2024-005 (Auditor Assigned Reference Number) Finding Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA)- Period of Performance Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Julie Remschneider Contact Phone Number and Email Address: julie.r@nn.k12.in.us, 219-285-2228 Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: We will ensure the Special Education Co-op will have controls in place to make sure payments are made within the period of performance. Anticipated Completion Date: September 30, 2025
Finding 537546 (2024-001)
Significant Deficiency 2024
Corrective Action Plan Finding 2024-001 Finding Summary: The Center did not exclude charges for patient care when calculating modified total direct costs (MTDC) in accordance with Uniform Guidance and TxGMS and thus the indirect rate used in calculating the indirect amount charged to the grant was n...
Corrective Action Plan Finding 2024-001 Finding Summary: The Center did not exclude charges for patient care when calculating modified total direct costs (MTDC) in accordance with Uniform Guidance and TxGMS and thus the indirect rate used in calculating the indirect amount charged to the grant was not consistently accurate. Corrective Action Plan: The Center has historically calculated the indirect amount using the same methodology over time. Given the small volume of patient receipts, the impact on the total indirect amount is minor. We believe that had we modified our calculations, we would have had enough modified total direct costs to cover the change in the calculation. The Center will modify all future calculations to ensure alignment. We will also review the fiscal year covered under this audit to understand what the impact of the change would have been on the split between cost types. Note that since we are midway through our next fiscal year, and we consider the differences minor, we have determined that we will correct for any future reimbursement requests, but will not modify prior reimbursement requests. Similarly, we will conduct a review of that fiscal year to determine the impact of the change and verify it is not significant. Responsible Individuals: Rusty Taylor, CFO Joe Carrington, Director of Financial Planning and Analysis Anticipated Completion Date: August 2025
View Audit 348829 Questioned Costs: $1
« 1 5 6 8 9 20 »