Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
51,939
In database
Filtered Results
11,014
Matching current filters
Showing Page
231 of 441
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Reference Number: 2023-001 Prior Year Finding: 2022-002 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program: Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Assistance Listing Number: 14.218 Award Number and Year: B-19-UC-24-0002 (7/31/2019 – 9/1/2027), B-20-UC-24-...
Reference Number: 2023-001 Prior Year Finding: 2022-002 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program: Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Assistance Listing Number: 14.218 Award Number and Year: B-19-UC-24-0002 (7/31/2019 – 9/1/2027), B-20-UC-24- 0002 (8/17/2020 – 9/1/2028), B-21-UC-24-0002 (10/27/2021 – 9/1/2029), B-22-UC-24-002 (7/1/2022 – 9/1/2029) Compliance Requirement: Reporting – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance, Material Noncompliance Recommendation: We recommend that the County develop internal controls and procedures to ensure that FFATA reporting requirements are met. We further recommend the County develop controls and procedures to ensure that all required subawards are reported accurately and timely to FSRS. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: DHCD will review and update procedures to ensure the department is in full compliance with the FFATA guidelines. In addition, DHCD will review all remaining balances from prior year grant awards and record the awards in FSRS. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Edren Lewis, Chief Budget, Accounting and Loan Servicing Manager Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2024 Any questions concerning the findings or corrective action plan can be directed to Aspasia Xypolia, Director, DHCD at 301-883- 5531.
Finding 394867 (2023-003)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) Compliance Planned Corrective Action: The University will proceed with approval and implementation of draft policies and procedures and will expand the information security program to address identified issues. The University will allocate necessary resources and wil...
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) Compliance Planned Corrective Action: The University will proceed with approval and implementation of draft policies and procedures and will expand the information security program to address identified issues. The University will allocate necessary resources and will contract with necessary third-party providers to meet existing resource and technology gaps. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Jeff Lundblad, AVP and Chief Information Officer Anticipated Date of Completion: October, 2024
FINDING 2023-007: Misclassification of Capital Purchases Response: District Clerk and Business Manager will ensure all capital purchases are correctly classified and coded within the 730 [major equipment-new] or 740 [major equipment- replacement] object line items. It will also be the Clerk's re...
FINDING 2023-007: Misclassification of Capital Purchases Response: District Clerk and Business Manager will ensure all capital purchases are correctly classified and coded within the 730 [major equipment-new] or 740 [major equipment- replacement] object line items. It will also be the Clerk's responsibility to ensure capital purchase expenditure lines arc built within annual budgets.
Reference Number 2023-001 Quality Assurance Program Verification Activities (ALN 20.205) Corrective Action: Upon notification by TxDOT of the non-compliance on the 365 Tollway Project, the Authority took the following action: 1. Suspended work with consultant on November 10, 2023, and subseque...
Reference Number 2023-001 Quality Assurance Program Verification Activities (ALN 20.205) Corrective Action: Upon notification by TxDOT of the non-compliance on the 365 Tollway Project, the Authority took the following action: 1. Suspended work with consultant on November 10, 2023, and subsequently terminated their contract on December 21, 2023, for non-compliance with quality assurance requirements. 2. Enforced the contract with its Owner’s Independent Assurance Program (IAP) consultant to provide continuous monitoring of all technician certifications/accreditations for the life of the project. 3. Procured services to perform forensic investigation and evaluation of the work performed by the non-compliant technicians to confirm materials meet quality assurance standards. Proposed Completion Date: The IAP is monitoring all technician certifications/accreditation and will continue monitoring for the life of the project. The forensic investigation and evaluation of the work performed by the non-compliant technicians will be completed by December 2024. Name of contact person: Pilar Rodriguez, P.E., Executive Director Contact Information: (956) 402-3762 prodriguez@hcrma.net
Finding Number: 2023-005 Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name 10.558, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Child Care and Adult Food Program Federal Award Identification Number and Year 15-016-271P-00 Pass through Entity Illinois State Board of Education Finding Type Material we...
Finding Number: 2023-005 Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name 10.558, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Child Care and Adult Food Program Federal Award Identification Number and Year 15-016-271P-00 Pass through Entity Illinois State Board of Education Finding Type Material weakness Repeat Finding No Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government," issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the "Internal Control Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Other requirements include: a) Per 7 CFR 226.10(c)(1), prior to submitting its consolidated monthly claim to the State agency, each sponsoring organization must perform edit checks on each facility's meal claim; per 7 CFR sections 226.16(g) and (h), a sponsoring organization must disburse advance and meal reimbursement payments to centers and day care homes under its sponsorship within five working days of receiving them from its state agency. b) Per 7 CFR 226.15(f), each sponsoring organization of day care homes shall determine which of the day care homes under its sponsorship are eligible as tier I day care homes c) Communication from the passthrough entity to return to pre COVID 19 monitoring, as required under 7 CFR 226.16(d)(4)(iii), effective October 1, 2022, where sponsoring organizations are required to perform onsite monitoring of each of its facilities three times every year, which includes requirements to ensure the amount of time between reviews does not exceed six months (unless review average is used). Condition A lack of documented controls as evidence of supervisory review and segregation of duties to ensure compliance with Federal program requirements, specifically over: a) monthly expenditure reports submitted to the passthrough entity b) tier (day care home eligibility) determinations c) subrecipient monitoring Questioned Costs None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed N/A no instances of material noncompliance noted that would result in questioned costs Context a) During testing a sample of 5 monthly expenditure submissions, we noted no formally documented supervisory review in place. Additionally, during testing of 40 disbursements to providers, we noted no formally documented supervisory review to ensure disbursements to providers are made within 5 working days of receipt from the State passthrough entity. b) While gaining an understanding of controls over tier (day care home eligibility) determinations, we noted no controls established to ensure supervisory review of these determinations. c) While testing a sample 40 provider monitoring visits, we noted 3 visits without evidence of supervisory review and 6 visits where the visit was completed and validated in the software by the same individual. Additionally, we noted 16 day care homes and 2 day care centers with less than the required 3 annual on site monitoring visits for the year, and 15 day care homes and 2 day care centers where onsite monitoring performed were more than the required 6 months apart. Cause and Effect A lack of effectively designed, implemented, and operating controls in any of these areas could result in a material noncompliance with program requirements or Uniform Guidance. Recommendation We recommend management formalize documentation of a supervisory review of: a) monthly expenditure submissions before submitting to the passthrough entity, including documented supervisory controls to ensure disbursement timeliness is met within 5 working days as part of this review; b) of data used in making tier/eligibility determinations for accuracy and completeness; and c) of subrecipient monitoring. Additionally, we recommend management work with its passthrough entities to confirm compliance requirements, especially when compliance requirements change as the result of ending or expiring waivers and flexibilities. Planned Corrective Action Plan –Organization will document process that is used for second review of the monthly expenditure submissions by 04/30/2024. There are no instances of the Organization not providing funds to provider within the mandated 5 days, however, the Organization will document the process for provider payments within 5 days by 04/30/2024. The software required to be used by the funder for management of the program does have limitations on how the data input for making tier/eligibility determinations second review is documented. Organization will design process to document this second review has occurred by 04/30/2024. Staffing shortages coming out the COVID-19 waivers resulted in the inability to perform all required Subrecipient monitoring. This staffing shortage was rectified by 08/31/2023. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Loukisha Pennex, Chief of Youth and Family Potential, Anjanette Brown, CFO and Teresa Rodriguez, Senior Director of Grants and Contracts. Anticipated Completion Date: April 2024
FINDING 2023-004 Compliance Requirement(s): Reporting Audit Finding(s): Material Weakness and Other Matters Summary of Finding: An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements ...
FINDING 2023-004 Compliance Requirement(s): Reporting Audit Finding(s): Material Weakness and Other Matters Summary of Finding: An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the following compliance requirements: Reporting The Unit has not separated incompatible activities within the managing of the federal award programs. The failure to establish these controls could enable material misstatements and noncompliance to be undetected. Management reviews award agreements, contracts and DOE reporting dates and requirements and submits the Annual report to IDOE. Management reviews report for accuracy between the Treasurer and Grant Manager (Asst. Superintendent). A second approval could not be verified. Segregation of duties during the process of entering, approving, and submitting the Annual Reports failed. Views of Responsible Officials: We Concur with this finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: In the future, the Required DOE Reports will be prepared by the assistant superintendent, who oversees all grant management. Then, the Business Manager will review the prepared reports; upon review, both the business manager and the assistant superintendent will sign/initial the signifying their review of the documents. The report will also be shared with the Superintendent, who will sign off as well. Anticipated Completion Date: Effective Immediately
In  the  future,  the  Hospital  will  maintain  adequate  financial  records  and  supporting  documentation for federal awards. The Hospital will use a spreadsheet to track all federal awards. The spreadsheet will be prepared by the accountant and reviewed by the Chief Financial O...
In  the  future,  the  Hospital  will  maintain  adequate  financial  records  and  supporting  documentation for federal awards. The Hospital will use a spreadsheet to track all federal awards. The spreadsheet will be prepared by the accountant and reviewed by the Chief Financial Officer. The spreadsheet will be included in the monthly financial information provided to the Board of Directors for review and approval. Responsible Individuals: Stephani Tipton, Accountant and Ken Fisher, CFO Anticipated Completion Date: Ongoing
View Audit 304697 Questioned Costs: $1
·         Equipment and Real Property Management
·         Equipment and Real Property Management
View Audit 304663 Questioned Costs: $1
o   Responsible Person(s): Rashunna Rodgers, General Business Manager & Denise Palmer, AR Public School Resource Center
o   Responsible Person(s): Rashunna Rodgers, General Business Manager & Denise Palmer, AR Public School Resource Center
View Audit 304663 Questioned Costs: $1
§  Criteria or specific requirement: Purchase of real property and/or construction for improvements require the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity, as specified in OMB 2 CFR section 200.439.
§  Criteria or specific requirement: Purchase of real property and/or construction for improvements require the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity, as specified in OMB 2 CFR section 200.439.
View Audit 304663 Questioned Costs: $1
§  Condition: During our examination of real property and construction improvements from the Education Stabilization Fund, we identified a facilities improvement purchase that was denied approval of Education Stabilization funding. Expenditures paid from Education Stabilization Funds for this proje...
§  Condition: During our examination of real property and construction improvements from the Education Stabilization Fund, we identified a facilities improvement purchase that was denied approval of Education Stabilization funding. Expenditures paid from Education Stabilization Funds for this project totaled $622,511.
View Audit 304663 Questioned Costs: $1
§  Cause: Lack of internal controls and management oversight over program expenditures.
§  Cause: Lack of internal controls and management oversight over program expenditures.
View Audit 304663 Questioned Costs: $1
§  Effect or potential effect: Unallowable costs of $622,511 were paid from COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund.
§  Effect or potential effect: Unallowable costs of $622,511 were paid from COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund.
View Audit 304663 Questioned Costs: $1
§  Questioned costs: The amount of questioned cost was $622,511.
§  Questioned costs: The amount of questioned cost was $622,511.
View Audit 304663 Questioned Costs: $1
§  Context: Examination of all payments made for construction for improvements to land, buildings, and equipment totaling $1,577.417.
§  Context: Examination of all payments made for construction for improvements to land, buildings, and equipment totaling $1,577.417.
View Audit 304663 Questioned Costs: $1
o   Corrective Action Plan (Anticipated Completion Date: June 1, 2024)
o   Corrective Action Plan (Anticipated Completion Date: June 1, 2024)
View Audit 304663 Questioned Costs: $1
The issue related to this finding will be resolved by reclassifying the fund to the appropriate fund source. The district sought the guidance of Division of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) to confirm the reclassification along with returning the funds to the Arkansas Department of Educati...
The issue related to this finding will be resolved by reclassifying the fund to the appropriate fund source. The district sought the guidance of Division of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) to confirm the reclassification along with returning the funds to the Arkansas Department of Education. A system of checks and balances has been established for spending approval of all purchases including construction or contracted services.
View Audit 304663 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding Number: 2023-017 Federal Program: 14.218, Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), CDBG – Entitlement Grants Cluster, Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Program (CDBG) Condition Per Auditor: The County filed the FFATA report seven months late Planned Corrective A...
Finding Number: 2023-017 Federal Program: 14.218, Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), CDBG – Entitlement Grants Cluster, Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Program (CDBG) Condition Per Auditor: The County filed the FFATA report seven months late Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding. The County will implement a notification process to include communication to the grants division once grant contracts are approved. Subsequent FFATA reports will be filed of notification of approval no later than the last day of the month following the month in which the subaward/subaward amendment obligation. Anticipated Completion Date: 6/30/25 Responsible Contact Person: Shauntika Bullard
Finding Number: 2023-016 Federal Program: 14.218, Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), CDBG – Entitlement Grants Cluster, Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Program (CDBG), COVID 19 Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Program (CDBG-CV) Condition Per...
Finding Number: 2023-016 Federal Program: 14.218, Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), CDBG – Entitlement Grants Cluster, Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Program (CDBG), COVID 19 Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Program (CDBG-CV) Condition Per Auditor: The County did not have adequate controls in place to submit the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) for the program year ended June 30, 2023 within 90 days after the close of the program year. Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. Prior to submitting the CAPER, it was brought to the attention of staff that the CDBG Financial Summary Report had to be completed and attached to the CAPER. Staff held discussions with HUD during a MSHDA Conference (September of 2022) to obtain assistance in completing the report. It was suggested that a meeting would be necessary to provide technical assistance for the report. Staff met with HUD October 4th to discuss the report and provide further guidance. The CAPER report was completed and submitted October 6th. The CDBG Financial Summary Report was completed as part of the CAPER. Management will ensure the CAPER is submitted prior to the deadline moving forward. Anticipated Completion Date: 6/30/25 Responsible Contact Person: Tuesday Redmond
Finding Number: 2023-015 Federal Program: 14.218 – U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) – Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) – Entitlement Grants Cluster 93.563 – Title IV-D, U.S. Department of Health and Human Service - Child Support Enforcement (CSE) 10.557, U.S. Department...
Finding Number: 2023-015 Federal Program: 14.218 – U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) – Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) – Entitlement Grants Cluster 93.563 – Title IV-D, U.S. Department of Health and Human Service - Child Support Enforcement (CSE) 10.557, U.S. Department of Agriculture – WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children Condition Per Auditor: Controls in place were not adequate to ensure compliance with 2 CFR 200 Appendix V submission requirements for the County’s self insurance cost allocation process and annual chargeback plan. Planned Corrective Action: Management communicated with the cognizant agency which confirmed in November 2021, OMB issued guidance relating to CARES Act funding and its effect on indirect cost. Part of this guidance stated that “CARES Act funding should not be included toward the threshold amount for indirect cost submission required in 2 C.F.R. part 200, Appendix VII, paragraph D.1.b”. Therefore, County governments that met the $100 million threshold as a result of CARES Act funding are not required to submit their Central Service Cost Allocation Plan for approval. The CARES Act funding would have increased the County’s funding in excess of $100 million, which should not have been a part of the determination for the original finding. However, since CSLFRF funds were also received increasing the County’s funding in excess of $100 million the annual chargeback plans were submitted to the cognizant agency and U.S. Treasury in 2023 for implementation in FY 24 and will continue to submit subsequent plans to federal cognizant agency, as required by 2 CFR 200 Appendix V. Anticipated Completion Date: 9/30/24 Responsible Contact Person: Shauntika Bullard and Michael Bridges
Finding Number: 2023-014 Federal Program: 10.557, U.S. Department of Agriculture – WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children Condition Per Auditor: Controls in place were not adequate to ensure the County maintained responsibility for compliance with eligibility sta...
Finding Number: 2023-014 Federal Program: 10.557, U.S. Department of Agriculture – WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children Condition Per Auditor: Controls in place were not adequate to ensure the County maintained responsibility for compliance with eligibility standards when eligibility determinations are made by the contractor. Planned Corrective Action: Management has fully implemented a process, as of January 2024, by which a county representee preforms review of contractor eligibility determinations. Anticipated Completion Date: 1/31/24 Responsible Contact Person: Nataline Dean-Woods
Finding Number: 2023-013 Federal Program: 21.027, US Department of Treasury, COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Condition Per Auditor: The County entered into intergovernmental agreements with local communities using the revenue loss provision of the County’s CSLFRF...
Finding Number: 2023-013 Federal Program: 21.027, US Department of Treasury, COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Condition Per Auditor: The County entered into intergovernmental agreements with local communities using the revenue loss provision of the County’s CSLFRF award. Those contracts contained subrecipient language/provisions. The County did not have adequate controls in place to ensure that the form and substance of these agreements were in compliance with the intended nature of the relationship and/or the requirements of the federal award. Planned Corrective Action: Management does not agree with this finding. As noted in the Condition of this finding itself, the agreements in question are intergovernmental agreements, clearly labeled as such. They specifically state they are funding each project with SLFRF funds under the Revenue Replacement Category (Category 6.1). Section 4.01 states “Project Funds must be used for eligible activities for revenue replacement funds as described in the SLFRF final rules, regulations, and guidance.” As Management informed the auditor before auditor edited its preliminary finding to reflect this, “as described in the SLFRF final rules, regulations, and guidance” under 6.1 there are no subrecipients by definition as the County itself is the beneficiary. The County is being "made whole" for calculated revenue loss due to the pandemic under this category; therefore, once the funds are obligated and spent by the County the purpose has been satisfied. The entity receiving those funds would not have subrecipient obligations. FAQ 13.14 confirms this understanding. The communities enter into subrecipient agreements on an annual basis with the County and are very familiar with the format of such agreements. Those agreements always state clearly that they are subrecipient agreements in the title and the introductory paragraph. The communities also enter into intergovernmental agreements with the County on an annual basis. Therefore, they are aware that these two types of agreement are distinct. In this case the agreements are clearly labeled as intergovernmental agreements in the title and the introductory paragraph and there is no mention of subrecipient status in the body of the agreement. In fact, Section 4.05, Relationship of Parties, states “Relationship of the Community to the County is, and will continue to be, that of an independent contractor.” In the subrecipient agreements the County enters into with these communities on an annual basis this clause says the relationship is that of a subrecipient. Therefore, the agreement is clear on the relationship and the communities would know to consult the County if there is any question of compliance requirements. Any language requiring compliance with provisions applicable to subrecipients was paired with the qualifier "applicable". For example Article IX requires compliance with laws only “as applicable”. This is catch-all language and is good legal practice to include for contingencies. In this case, the program being a new federal program, the County intentionally included this catch-all language referencing compliance with 2 CFR 200 (Uniform Guidance) “as applicable” and required the community to “provide any disclosures required by law.” to allow itself the ability to enforce should the laws, rules, or regulations be interpreted in a certain manner to be applicable or even changed. This is based on experience with programs such as the Neighborhood Stabilization Program through HUD where such occurrences were noted. Consequently; the County believes it would actually be irresponsible not to include such language. As far as the recommendation of increased guidance to contracted communities, given the increased guidance available now the County has provided such guidance as needed. Auditor seems to indicate that the communities “may improperly conclude they are subject to certain compliance requirements, including but not limited to incorrectly concluding they are required to report expenditures incurred under the agreements on their schedule of expenditures of federal awards, which could further lead to those communities incorrectly concluding they are subject to the requirement to obtain a single audit and/or incorrect major program determinations being made in conjunction with their single audit engagements.” The finding is essentially noting that if these communities conclude that they have a subrecipient relationship and that the Uniform Guidance is applicable to them as subrecipients it is an improper conclusion. Given the wide availability of FAQs and guidance on this topic, Management agrees it would be an improper conclusion. Anticipated Completion Date: 9/30/23 Responsible Contact Person: Haaris Ahmad
Finding Number: 2023-012 Federal Program: 21.027, US Department of Treasury, COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Condition Per Auditor: The County did not have adequate controls in place to ensure funds transferred to a component unit were not reported to the Treasur...
Finding Number: 2023-012 Federal Program: 21.027, US Department of Treasury, COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) Condition Per Auditor: The County did not have adequate controls in place to ensure funds transferred to a component unit were not reported to the Treasury until the component unit met the criteria for obligated the funds. As a result, the County reported, to Treasury, $10,000,000 as obligated based on an agreement between the County and a discreetly presented component unit of the County prior to those funds meeting the definition of obligated. Planned Corrective Action: Management has updated the determination of the relationship with the Drains Commission, a separate legal entity, and subsequently adjusted the SEFA to report the current expenditures of the project. The Treasury report will be adjusted in the next reporting period. Anticipated Completion Date: 6/30/24 Responsible Contact Person: Shauntika Bullard
Finding Number: 2023-011 Federal Program: 21.023, US Department of Treasury, COVID-19 – Emergency Rental Assistance Condition Per Auditor: Controls were not adequate to ensure risk assessments were performed in advance of the executing agreement with the County’s two subrecipients for the ERA progra...
Finding Number: 2023-011 Federal Program: 21.023, US Department of Treasury, COVID-19 – Emergency Rental Assistance Condition Per Auditor: Controls were not adequate to ensure risk assessments were performed in advance of the executing agreement with the County’s two subrecipients for the ERA program for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2023. Planned Corrective Action: Management has developed a new system of Risk Assessments that will be implemented to receive documentation prior to the execution of awards. Anticipated Completion Date: 9/30/24 Responsible Contact Person: Shauntika Bullard
« 1 229 230 232 233 441 »