Audit 320794

FY End
2023-12-31
Total Expended
$6.64M
Findings
4
Programs
6
Organization: Southeast Texas Food Bank, Inc. (TX)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-09-25

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
498119 2023-001 - Yes I
498120 2023-002 Material Weakness Yes P
1074561 2023-001 - Yes I
1074562 2023-002 Material Weakness Yes P

Contacts

Name Title Type
YHGHJ7VZK3G7 Harvey Zernial Auditee
4098398777 Jeremy Triska Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE 2 Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of Southeast Texas Food Bank, Inc. and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: THE AUDITEE DID NOT USE THE DE MINIMIS COST RATE Federal grant funds are considered to be earned to the extent of expenditures made under the provisions of the grant.
Title: NOTE 3 Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of Southeast Texas Food Bank, Inc. and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: THE AUDITEE DID NOT USE THE DE MINIMIS COST RATE The period of availability for federal grant funds for the purpose of liquidation of outstanding obligations made on or before the ending date of the federal project period extended 90 days beyond the federal project period ending date or as specified in a program regulation, in accordance with provisions in Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards – Section 200.343 Closeout.
Title: NOTE 4 Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of Southeast Texas Food Bank, Inc. and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: THE AUDITEE DID NOT USE THE DE MINIMIS COST RATE Nonmonetary assistance is reported in the schedule at the USDA food value of the commodities received, as confirmed with the Texas Department of Agriculture, and disbursed as of December 31, 2023.
Title: NOTE 5 Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of Southeast Texas Food Bank, Inc. and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: THE AUDITEE DID NOT USE THE DE MINIMIS COST RATE Southeast Texas Food Bank, Inc. does not record indirect costs for any of its Federal Programs.

Finding Details

2023‐001 – COVID‐19 Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Funds – Food Bank Capacity Grant (ARPA) (ALN 21.027) United States Department of Agriculture, Passed through the Texas Department of Agriculture. Compliance – Office of Management and Budget Guidance for Grants and Agreements Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards 2 Code Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 Procurement Standards (2 CFR 200). Criteria: The Southeast Texas Food Bank is required to adhere to procurement guidelines reflected in the applicable state and federal regulations and conform to 2 CRF 200 procurement requirements. Condition and Context: The Food Bank did not follow Texas Department of Agriculture’s or the 2 CFR 200 required Methods of Procurement. Deviations include lack of adherence to required Formal Procurement Methods for purchases over the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT) (advertisement, sealed bids, etc.), competitive bidding for purchases over the SAT threshold, unavailable supporting documents demonstrating compliance with Small Purchase Procedures for purchases over the micro purchase threshold and under the SAT, and formal procurement requirements and other instances of noncompliance that do not rise to the level of a finding. Cause: Southeast Texas Food Bank experienced turnover in key management positions. Sufficient training and transition of responsibilities, procurement policies and procedures applicable to compliance with 2 CRF 200 was not conducted. Effect: The entity did not follow state and federal procurement requirements, consequently, purchases were made during 2023 that were not in compliance with state and federal requirements. Repeat Finding: See prior year finding 2022-001. Recommendation: Management should take steps to ensure that the Food Bank identifies, assigns responsibility, and adheres to procurement requirements for federal funding. If procurement requirements for a pass through entity and grantor differ, the more restrictive procurement requirements should be followed. View of Responsible Party: Management concurs with recommendation. See corrective action plan.
2023‐002 – COVID‐19 Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Funds – Food Bank Capacity Grant (ARPA) (ALN 21.027) United States Department of Agriculture, Passed through the Texas Department of Agriculture. Internal Control – Monitoring Criteria: Monitoring should be such that there is an assurance that control activities are being performed in a timely manner. Condition and Context: The policies and procedures in place during 2023 did not include proper monitoring of the program policies and procedures. Cause: Southeast Texas Food Bank experienced turnover in key management positions. Sufficient training and transition of responsibilities related to the monitoring of compliance with 2 CRF 200 was not conducted. Effect: As a result of this lack of monitoring, deficiencies in Program Compliance including procurement and other instances of noncompliance that do not rise to the level of a finding were not recognized and corrected on a timely basis Repeat Finding: See prior year finding 2022-002. Recommendation: Management should consider implementation of a contemporaneous monitoring process over procurement with federal and state funding. View of Responsible Party: Management concurs with recommendation. See corrective action plan.
2023‐001 – COVID‐19 Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Funds – Food Bank Capacity Grant (ARPA) (ALN 21.027) United States Department of Agriculture, Passed through the Texas Department of Agriculture. Compliance – Office of Management and Budget Guidance for Grants and Agreements Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards 2 Code Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 Procurement Standards (2 CFR 200). Criteria: The Southeast Texas Food Bank is required to adhere to procurement guidelines reflected in the applicable state and federal regulations and conform to 2 CRF 200 procurement requirements. Condition and Context: The Food Bank did not follow Texas Department of Agriculture’s or the 2 CFR 200 required Methods of Procurement. Deviations include lack of adherence to required Formal Procurement Methods for purchases over the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT) (advertisement, sealed bids, etc.), competitive bidding for purchases over the SAT threshold, unavailable supporting documents demonstrating compliance with Small Purchase Procedures for purchases over the micro purchase threshold and under the SAT, and formal procurement requirements and other instances of noncompliance that do not rise to the level of a finding. Cause: Southeast Texas Food Bank experienced turnover in key management positions. Sufficient training and transition of responsibilities, procurement policies and procedures applicable to compliance with 2 CRF 200 was not conducted. Effect: The entity did not follow state and federal procurement requirements, consequently, purchases were made during 2023 that were not in compliance with state and federal requirements. Repeat Finding: See prior year finding 2022-001. Recommendation: Management should take steps to ensure that the Food Bank identifies, assigns responsibility, and adheres to procurement requirements for federal funding. If procurement requirements for a pass through entity and grantor differ, the more restrictive procurement requirements should be followed. View of Responsible Party: Management concurs with recommendation. See corrective action plan.
2023‐002 – COVID‐19 Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Funds – Food Bank Capacity Grant (ARPA) (ALN 21.027) United States Department of Agriculture, Passed through the Texas Department of Agriculture. Internal Control – Monitoring Criteria: Monitoring should be such that there is an assurance that control activities are being performed in a timely manner. Condition and Context: The policies and procedures in place during 2023 did not include proper monitoring of the program policies and procedures. Cause: Southeast Texas Food Bank experienced turnover in key management positions. Sufficient training and transition of responsibilities related to the monitoring of compliance with 2 CRF 200 was not conducted. Effect: As a result of this lack of monitoring, deficiencies in Program Compliance including procurement and other instances of noncompliance that do not rise to the level of a finding were not recognized and corrected on a timely basis Repeat Finding: See prior year finding 2022-002. Recommendation: Management should consider implementation of a contemporaneous monitoring process over procurement with federal and state funding. View of Responsible Party: Management concurs with recommendation. See corrective action plan.