Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
48,654
In database
Filtered Results
8,284
Matching current filters
Showing Page
295 of 332
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: Significant Deficiency
The District had a significant turnover in the Education Services Department in FY 2021-2022 and the backup documentation to demonstrate that contact was made with identified eligible private school was not located. It should be noted that there are currently procedures in place to ascertain that co...
The District had a significant turnover in the Education Services Department in FY 2021-2022 and the backup documentation to demonstrate that contact was made with identified eligible private school was not located. It should be noted that there are currently procedures in place to ascertain that contact is made with all eligible private schools and kept on file in a manner that meets all requirements for compliance. As a result, this evidence remains available for subsequent school years.
Finding 32616 (2022-003)
Significant Deficiency 2022
2022-003 - Sub-recipient Agreements: Significant Deficiency Auditor Recommendation: Recommend that the City review 2 ? CFR Part 200 to ensure information required in sub-recipient agreements is properly included. Management's Response: Agree with the finding. Corrective Action Taken: The City wi...
2022-003 - Sub-recipient Agreements: Significant Deficiency Auditor Recommendation: Recommend that the City review 2 ? CFR Part 200 to ensure information required in sub-recipient agreements is properly included. Management's Response: Agree with the finding. Corrective Action Taken: The City will review 2 CFR Part 200 to ensure the assistance listing number of the grant funding being passed through, and the indication that the sub-recipient would be subject to single audit requirements set forth in 2 CFR Part 200, Sub-part F (Uniform Guidance). This Corrective Action will be completed no later than the subsequent quarterly report due date of April 30, 2023.
Finding 32614 (2022-001)
Significant Deficiency 2022
2022-001 - Sub-award Reporting Requirements for Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA): Significant Deficiency Auditor Recommendation: Recommend the City implement a tracking system to remind staff of the various reports due and respective deadlines Management's Response: Agre...
2022-001 - Sub-award Reporting Requirements for Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA): Significant Deficiency Auditor Recommendation: Recommend the City implement a tracking system to remind staff of the various reports due and respective deadlines Management's Response: Agree with the finding. Corrective Action Taken: Upon the next reporting cycle under ARPA, the City will collect the necessary information to satisfy the FFATA for sub-award recipients. Further, the City will be diligent in that any future sub-award recipients who meet the criteria will be reported according to these FFATA reporting requirements. This Corrective Action will be completed no later than the subsequent quarterly repo1t due date of April 30, 2023.
Office of Medical Assistance Programs? Bureau of Data and Claims Management (BDCM) is currently negotiating an amendment to the PROMISe contract with Gainwell Technologies which will bolster the NCCI performance requirement to explicitly include the elements identified in the finding. Anticipated C...
Office of Medical Assistance Programs? Bureau of Data and Claims Management (BDCM) is currently negotiating an amendment to the PROMISe contract with Gainwell Technologies which will bolster the NCCI performance requirement to explicitly include the elements identified in the finding. Anticipated Completion Date: 05/01/2023 Contact Person and Title: Toni Hoffecker, Dir., Div. of Systems, Monitoring and Oversight, BDCM
PDE uses its eGrants system to collect all LEA required records under ESSER I and ESSER II. The eGrants system is designed to allow licensed educational agencies and certain community-based programs within the Commonwealth, access to PDE grants. Through this system, the LEA can submit applications f...
PDE uses its eGrants system to collect all LEA required records under ESSER I and ESSER II. The eGrants system is designed to allow licensed educational agencies and certain community-based programs within the Commonwealth, access to PDE grants. Through this system, the LEA can submit applications for funding, e-sign contracting documents, upload back-up documentation, submit program quarterly reports, and file final expenditure reports. PDE Division of Federal Programs also utilizes Pennsylvania's Information Management System (PIMS) to collect and verify LEA data. PIMS has business rules built in to ensure valid data collection. The eGrants system makes it possible for records pertaining to the ESSER awards to be retained separately from other grant funds, including funds that an SEA or LEA receives under the CARES Act and CRRSA. This follows the requirements under 2 C.F.R. ? 200.334 and 34 C.F.R. ? 76.730, including financial records related to the use of grant funds. Through quarterly financial reporting, LEAs are required to report the amount of cash received, expended, and on hand. If the amount of cash-on-hand reported is determined to be too high, or the quarterly report is not submitted, monthly payments will be suspended until the next quarterly report is due. Current monitoring to verify data and ensure compliance with existing federal guidelines, typically occurs from January through May. LEAs receive a unique username and password to access Fedmonitor and complete an online self-assessment. Beginning in October 2022, all LEAs were placed on a four-year monitoring cycle and were monitored in the 2021?22 fiscal year and will be monitored again in the 2024?25 fiscal year. Data collected in eGrants, PIMS and Fedmonitor is verified during these monitoring visits. Anticipated Completion Date: Completed Contact Person and Title: Susan McCrone, Division Manager, Federal Programs; Brian Campbell, Director, Bureau of Curriculum, Assessment, and Instruction
View Audit 27724 Questioned Costs: $1
While the Governor?s Budget Office agrees with the fact cited in finding, it is not possible to correct the situation and the error had no impact on the implementation of the federal program. No corrective action is necessary, nor would it have any discernable impact. The Interim Report was a one-...
While the Governor?s Budget Office agrees with the fact cited in finding, it is not possible to correct the situation and the error had no impact on the implementation of the federal program. No corrective action is necessary, nor would it have any discernable impact. The Interim Report was a one-time progress report required by U.S. Treasury to document our state?s progress in spending State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds and distributing, on the behalf of the U.S. Treasury, payments from the Treasury to Non-Entitlement Units (NEU) of local government as of July 31, 2021. The Interim Report also required states to provide revenue replacement calculations for calendar year 2020. This report was due on August 31, 2021. There were no follow up reports using the same format as the Interim Report. The figures reported as transfers to NEUs in the Interim Report accurately reflected the total dollars that had been electronically transferred to local governments as of July 31, 2021, as that was how we interpreted the federal guidance at the time. It was our interpretation that U.S. Treasury wanted information on how much had been distributed and received by NEUs as of July 31, 2021, rather than how many payments we had approved in our accounting system and were in the process of being paid. After filing the Interim Report, the Office of the Budget continued to report updates of distributions to NEUs both using a U.S. Treasury portal, and ultimately by exchanging spreadsheets of NEU data with the US Treasury to painstakingly ensure the data the U.S. Treasury had was correct. The Office of the Budget will continue to file compliance reports in accordance with U.S. Treasury?s guidance. At no time did the U.S. Treasury indicate there were issues with the composition or acceptability of our filed Interim Report. At this time, all NEU funds received from the federal government have been either distributed to NEUs or have been returned to the U.S. Treasury and this program is complete. Therefore, we are currently not required to, nor do we have plans to report on the progress of NEU distributions to the federal government in the future. Anticipated Completion Date: N/A Contact Person and Title: Mike Wood, Bureau Director, Bureau of Performance, Revenue, and Program Analysis; Colleen Kling, Division Manager, Division of Program Analysis and Performance Improvement
Similar to other DHS programs, DHS has implemented an after-action review of information submitted, using a contracted vendor. DHS faced challenges implementing a program with 67 counties and no central eligibility determination system. DHS has learned that implementing the supportive services and m...
Similar to other DHS programs, DHS has implemented an after-action review of information submitted, using a contracted vendor. DHS faced challenges implementing a program with 67 counties and no central eligibility determination system. DHS has learned that implementing the supportive services and multi-sector partnerships was challenging in the context of the global pandemic and workforce shortages. This made DHS dependent on local county reports to maintain program oversight and compile statewide data for submission to US Treasury. DHS plans to strengthen this control as we plan for future emergency or pandemic programs related to rental assistance. Anticipated Completion Date: 06/30/2023 Contact Person and Title: Joel O?Donnell, Director, Bureau of Program Support, OIM
View Audit 27724 Questioned Costs: $1
IT - PDA?s PA Meals team will incorporate appropriate migration strategies within the policy of ITP_INF000, along with providing a migration audit plan checklist for any future data migrations. Additionally, the INF000 will be incorporated into the Delivery Center?s development framework, where a...
IT - PDA?s PA Meals team will incorporate appropriate migration strategies within the policy of ITP_INF000, along with providing a migration audit plan checklist for any future data migrations. Additionally, the INF000 will be incorporated into the Delivery Center?s development framework, where appropriate. PDA added a Business Analyst to the team for assisting with future application testing and documentation. This individual will be directly involved in helping develop and orchestrate a testing strategy based on delivery center standards to include, but not limited to: - Determine appropriate criteria to be tested. - Assist in establishing a test group of qualified testers. - Coordinate with technical team on pass/fail criteria. - Utilize standard testing tasks/checklists ensuring consistency. - Assist the team, key business users and the technical team in reviewing testing results. The reports were reviewed electronically (100s of report pages) checking for various scenarios. As a result, these complete reports are similar and difficult to distinguish between without an associated checklist and specific report criteria. In the future, full test plans and execution results capturing pass/fail of the defined tests will be retained in pdf (or similar) format. The team will continue with best practices and delivery center standards, utilizing a Business Analyst as part of the testing and review process. The SEFA report had extensive testing, however, there is a timing issue that will always exist if the expectation is to provide the data in both January and September. The January report will be accurate for when it is run, along with what transactions were sent by the warehouse vendor. Subsequently, changes can and will occur to those commodities being reported on over the next 6 months. Additionally, it is reliant upon the warehouse vendor to report all transactions timely. As a result, running the same report after June 30th will consistently vary due to a physical inventory review in June, along with additional transactions being updated as part of the inventory review. PDA is recommending a one-time annual report in September, which will include all the adjustments from a June physical inventory and updated transactions. A January report is fine to run but should not be considered a fully accurate assessment due to the timing and missing data. Program - PDA strives to maintain accurate and complete records with respect to the receipt, distribution, and inventory of USDA donated foods, including end products processed from donated food. To that end, PDA has already or will put the following steps in place to strengthen procedures for future periods to ensure errors identified during the reconciliation process are corrected timely in the system: 1) All findings noted with regards to the Commodity Processors Inventory Report have been corrected and no known issues remain. 2) No further inventory balances remain on record with inactive distributors, as all product was previously transferred to active distributors. 3) Processor monthly performance reports (MPRs) will be completed and filed in accordance with USDA?s prescribed schedule (90 days after completion of month). 4) BFA will work with the Commodity Distributors and USDA to mutually resolve discrepancies and achieve reconciliation with USDA receipts. 5) Moving forward, all Commodity Distributor Inventory Reports will be reconciled by the beginning of a new federal fiscal year (October 1), and inventory balances at commodity distributors will agree with year-end physical inventory counts. Anticipated Completion Date: IT - 09/30/2023; Program 1-Completed; 2-Completed; 3-09/30/2023; 4-09/30/2023; 5-09/30/2023 Contact Person and Title: Caryn Long Earl, PDA, Director, Bureau of Food Assistance (BFA)
The Authority recognizes that the utility schedule was not updated in the most recent fiscal year. There has been staff turnover in the Authority in the roles that have oversight over these policies and in the transition, numerous things were not communicated as to whose responsibility it now is. Th...
The Authority recognizes that the utility schedule was not updated in the most recent fiscal year. There has been staff turnover in the Authority in the roles that have oversight over these policies and in the transition, numerous things were not communicated as to whose responsibility it now is. The Executive Director will be contacting HUD to determine the next course of action as the utility allowance schedule has been updated for 2023.
Finding 2022-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund ? Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 ? Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Departmen...
Finding 2022-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund ? Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 ? Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirements. Context: The School Corporation was required to submit two Annual Data Reports to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) to meet federal reporting requirements for ESSER grant awards and the GEER grant award. The first report was for the period of March 13, 2020 to September 30, 2020 and was due by January 21, 2021. The second report was for the period of October 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021 and was due by May 13, 2022. We noted for both reports that were submitted, there was no documented review by someone other than the preparer of the report to ensure the information submitted was complete and accurate. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding. Crawford County Community School Corporation will continue submission of required data to the IDOE on federal spending with at least two people completing the curation. However, final drafts will be reviewed and then final reports will be signed by the at least two people who reviewed the final draft. This signed copy, if not required to be submitting to the IDOE, will be kept locally. Responsible party and timeline for completion: 1) Amy Belcher, Program Administrator, will ensure all final reports have been reviewed and signed by at least two people before submission to the IDOE immediately.
Finding 32416 (2022-001)
Significant Deficiency 2022
Management has identified the incident where an agency signature was not obtained upon delivery of USDA foods to that agency. Management has verified that the delivery of USDA foods to that agency was a legitimate delivery in accordance the Compliance Requirements for the Emergency Food Assistance ...
Management has identified the incident where an agency signature was not obtained upon delivery of USDA foods to that agency. Management has verified that the delivery of USDA foods to that agency was a legitimate delivery in accordance the Compliance Requirements for the Emergency Food Assistance Program. Management believes that enhanced training and supervision will improve the application of management's documented controls that require agency signatures be obtained upon delivery of USDA foods to partnering agencies.
Finding 32393 (2022-003)
Significant Deficiency 2022
2022-003 Student Financial Assistance Cluster ? Assistance Listing No. 84.038 Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its procedures around the retention of Perkins loans r...
2022-003 Student Financial Assistance Cluster ? Assistance Listing No. 84.038 Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its procedures around the retention of Perkins loans records to ensure that all records for open loans are being properly maintained. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The University will continue to identify open loan records with missing master promissory notes. As such loan records are identified, the University will take necessary measures to request permission to assign these loans to the Department of Education. As this work is ongoing, all current loan records will continue to be stored securely in the Bursar?s area. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Rita Lambert, Bursar Planned completion date for corrective action plan: August 31, 2023
Finding 32392 (2022-004)
Significant Deficiency 2022
2022-004 Student Financial Assistance Cluster ? Assistance Listing No. 84.268 Recommendation: We recommend the University review all R2T4 calculations to ensure the correct net disbur...
2022-004 Student Financial Assistance Cluster ? Assistance Listing No. 84.268 Recommendation: We recommend the University review all R2T4 calculations to ensure the correct net disbursed amounts are entered for all Title IV aid. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Office of Financial Aid will recalculate the R2T4 with the correct net disbursement amount and request the additional funding directly through COD. Going forward, the Office of Financial Aid will perform a secondary review of all R2T4 calculations prior to processing for accuracy. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Robert Forest, Director of Financial Aid Planned completion date for corrective action plan: March 30, 2023
View Audit 27062 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 32391 (2022-002)
Significant Deficiency 2022
2022-002 Student Financial Assistance Cluster ? Assistance Listing No. 84.063, 84.268 Recommendation: We recommend the University review its policies and procedures to ensure accurate e...
2022-002 Student Financial Assistance Cluster ? Assistance Listing No. 84.063, 84.268 Recommendation: We recommend the University review its policies and procedures to ensure accurate effective dates are reported in both the campus and program level records submitted to the NSLDS. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Registrar?s Office will review National Student Clearinghouse (NSC) information following transmission, particularly for effective dates of completely withdrawn students. The NSC reports enrollments to NSLDS for the University. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Gerard J. Donahue, Registrar Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2023
Finding 2022-001 Program: COVID-19 Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution Assistance Listing Number: 93.498 Criteria: All recipients of Provider Relief Funds (PRF) payments must comply with the reporting requirements described in the PRF terms and conditions an...
Finding 2022-001 Program: COVID-19 Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution Assistance Listing Number: 93.498 Criteria: All recipients of Provider Relief Funds (PRF) payments must comply with the reporting requirements described in the PRF terms and conditions and specified in directions issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Condition and Context: The System did not complete the PRF reporting for Period 2 in accordance with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services guidance due to errors in the underlying data that lead to errors in the Period 2 report that was submitted. In the period 2 Submission, the System reported $2,283,650 of COVID-19 expenses, but failed to reduce the expenses by amounts reimbursed by other sources. Management updated their policies and procedures prior to Reporting Period 3 to address this issue. The System had $42,620,438 of lost revenue through Period 2 reporting, and has received $17,690,624 in PRF payments. Corrective Action Plan Corrective Action Planned: Thomas Health System, Inc. and its subsidiaries agrees with the finding, and policy and procedures were updated before reporting Period 3. Period 3 and 4 reporting were completed in accordance with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services most guidance. The System received a notice from the Department of Health & Human Services dated December 29, 2022 that HRSA's Division of Financial Integrity has determined that the findings cited in the Single Audit Report for fiscal year October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021 has been satisfactorily resolved. Name of Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Timothy Skeldon, Chief Financial Officer, 4605 MacCorkle Ave SW, South Charleston, WV 25309 Anticipated Completion Date: Completed September 30, 2022
Finding 32351 (2022-004)
Significant Deficiency 2022
2022-004 Provider Relief Fund ? Assistance Listing No. 93.498 Recommendation: We recommend that management review the Provider Relief Fund guidelines to make sure amounts requested for reimbursement are in line with the guidelines and tie back to support. Explanation of disagreement with audit findi...
2022-004 Provider Relief Fund ? Assistance Listing No. 93.498 Recommendation: We recommend that management review the Provider Relief Fund guidelines to make sure amounts requested for reimbursement are in line with the guidelines and tie back to support. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: During the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and the distribution of the PRF dollars, there were many unknowns and many elements changed including criteria and timelines. The System will continue to review the PRF Terms and Conditions and understand these to the best of our knowledge. However, it is noted that there was sufficient lost revenue to support the PRF distributions received. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Rebecca Busch, CFO Planned completion date for corrective action plan: We look to HRSA for guidance on how to correct the Period 1 report or will correct the error in a future reporting period. If the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has questions regarding this plan, please call Rebecca Busch, CFO at 715-939-1732.
View Audit 27255 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding: Thirteen reports within three quarters were submitted after the required deadline. We recommend reviewing the controls in place to ensure that all future reports are submitted on time and in accordance with grant requirements. If the Organization expects that there will be a delay in the su...
Finding: Thirteen reports within three quarters were submitted after the required deadline. We recommend reviewing the controls in place to ensure that all future reports are submitted on time and in accordance with grant requirements. If the Organization expects that there will be a delay in the submission of the reports, they should obtain permission to extend the submission date from the awarding agency. Statement of Concurrence or Non-Concurrence Statement of Concurrence: HopeWorks concurs with the finding and recommendation listed above. Corrective Action HopeWorks has implemented a number of streamlined processes in which to expedite the availablity of information needed to file the funder reports more timely. These processes are not limited to electronic import of payroll and benefit entries, implementation and consistent use of Bill.com for expenditures, and prioritization of recording credit card activity. Fifteen days is a strict deadline and if for some reason reporting will be late, HopeWorks will communicate to the funder and document that communication. In FY23, we are also working to streamline the technology and our internal and departmental grant reporting processes to ensure that we are being as efficient as possible with our existing resources, both technological and human.
Finding 32303 (2022-004)
Significant Deficiency 2022
REPRESENTATION OF CITY OF NASHWAUK CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Year Ended December 31, 2022 Finding Number: 2022-004 Finding Title: SEGREGATION OF DUTIES Name of Contact Person Responsible for Correcti...
REPRESENTATION OF CITY OF NASHWAUK CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Year Ended December 31, 2022 Finding Number: 2022-004 Finding Title: SEGREGATION OF DUTIES Name of Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action April Kurtock, Clerk/Treasurer Corrective Action Planned The City Council will attempt to monitor transactions and structure the duties of office personnel to help ensure as much segregation of duties as possible within the City's staffing limitations and funding constraints Anticipated Completion Date Ongoing.
Finding 2022-001 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance ? U.S. Department of Treasury ? Coronavirus Relief Fund City Municipal Assistance ? (CFDA No. 21.019) ? Reporting (continued) Passed Through Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Administration and Finance Nam...
Finding 2022-001 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance ? U.S. Department of Treasury ? Coronavirus Relief Fund City Municipal Assistance ? (CFDA No. 21.019) ? Reporting (continued) Passed Through Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Administration and Finance Name of Person Responsible: Marie T. Laflamme, Treasurer Sharyn Riley, Auditor John Miarecki, School Director of Budget & Finance Corrective Action Planned: The City will immediately review all expenses related to the Coronavirus Relief Funds. The City will take steps to reconcile the Coronavirus Report to our General Ledger. Anticipated Completion Date: May 30, 2023
The Board of Directors is and will remain involved in the financial affairs of the Cooperative.
The Board of Directors is and will remain involved in the financial affairs of the Cooperative.
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ? Assistance Listing No. 21.027 Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement policies and procedures surrounding the cash disbursement process that ensures disbursements to the chief executive officer are reviewed and approved by a se...
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ? Assistance Listing No. 21.027 Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement policies and procedures surrounding the cash disbursement process that ensures disbursements to the chief executive officer are reviewed and approved by a second, independent individual such as a board member. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Management will implement policies and procedures surrounding cash disbursement process ensuring disbursements to the chief executive officer are reviewed and approved by a second, independent individual such as a board member. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Joseph Holmes Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 10/31/23
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. All vouchers will be reviewed and approved by upper management before submission. These vouchers will be checked against a modified policy ensuring costs are reasonable, allowable, and all...
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. All vouchers will be reviewed and approved by upper management before submission. These vouchers will be checked against a modified policy ensuring costs are reasonable, allowable, and allocable to a State, Federal, local, and private awards shall be charged to that award directly or indirectly. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Shanan Egger, Chief Financial Officer Planned completion date for corrective action plan: September 2023
Finding 32166 (2022-004)
Significant Deficiency 2022
2022-Single Audit 01 Department of Social Services Title IV-E Adoption Assistance A sample of 40 children that received Title IV-E adoption subsidies during FY2022 was tested for compliance with the above criteria and the observations were noted below. ? 40 out of 40 children - Met the eligibilit...
2022-Single Audit 01 Department of Social Services Title IV-E Adoption Assistance A sample of 40 children that received Title IV-E adoption subsidies during FY2022 was tested for compliance with the above criteria and the observations were noted below. ? 40 out of 40 children - Met the eligibility requirements, had special needs that prevented them from being placed without a subsidy, and could not return home. ? 40 out of 40 children - RDSS made reasonable efforts to place the children without the subsidy or waived the requirement as it was not in the best interest of the child. ? 40 out of 40 children ? The adoption assistance agreements were signed prior to the final adoption decree, the authorized amounts were in line with the State?s rates, and payments were issued in accordance with the agreements. ? 9 out of 40 children ? Sufficient evidence of the completion of the required criminal background and child abuse and neglect registry checks for the adoptive parents and adult household members was not in the adoption case files. The home studies and report of investigations narrative indicated the required checks were completed for the adoptive parents and household members but did not identify when they occurred. Also, in some cases, it was not noted if the adoptive parents met the eligibility requirements for the criminal record checks. As such, the auditors were unable to confirm when the checks occurred, and supporting documentation was not provided prior to the completion of fieldwork. In addition, during the initial file review, documents such as court orders, negotiation documents, and annual affidavits were missing from some of the files. The Adoption Unit was ultimately able to retrieve and provide the missing items. However, an opportunity exists to improve the adoption case file documentation. Recommendations: ? We recommend that the Children, Families, and Adults (CFA) Deputy Director develop and implement a quality control process to ensure that the required documentation is maintained in the adoption case files. ? We recommend that the CFA Deputy Director develop and implement standard documentation requirements for documenting the completion of the background checks in the adoption case files. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: n/a ? no disagreement Action planned/taken in response to finding: Audit Recommendation: We recommend that the Children, Families, and Adults (CFA) Deputy Director develop and implement a quality control process to ensure that the required documentation is maintained in the adoption case files. RDSS Corrective Action Plan: The Reunification and Permanency Program Manager or designee will conduct quarterly adoption case reviews using the VDSS Guidance Section 3.9.3 - Adoption Records. The quarterly case sample represents 10% of the case and all cases will be reviewed at least once annually. Any findings will be documented to include corrective actions, person responsible and timeframe for correction. The Reunification and Permanency Program Manager or designee will review cases to confirm corrections. Audit Recommendation: We recommend that the CFA Deputy Director develop and implement standard documentation requirements for documenting the completion of the background checks in the adoption case files. RDSS Corrective Action Plan: All RDSS Adoptions files must include the VDSS Adoption File Checklist and the child?s adoptive family documentation. The required adoptive parent documentation includes: o Criminal Background Check Results - Licensed Child Placing Agencies ( Non-Conviction and/or Conviction Letter); Local Department of Social Services (Office of Background Investigations Determination Letter) o Sworn Statement of Affirmation o Child Abuse and Neglect Central Registry Check results for adoptive parent and adult household members. The Adoption and Resource Families Supervisors are responsible for monitoring compliance with documentation requirements for completion of the background checks, including insuring that documentation is requested from child ?placing agencies and third parties. Standard documentation requirements regarding background checks will be included in the quarterly review by the Reunification and Permanency Program Manager or designee. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Brinette Jones, Deputy Director, Division Children, Families and Adults Lavinia Hopkins, Reunification and Permanency Program Manger Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Ongoing, beginning 2nd quarter 2023 If there are any questions regarding this plan, please contact Brinette Jones at (804) 646-4543.
Finding 32163 (2022-005)
Significant Deficiency 2022
2022-Single Audit 02 Department of Social Services TANF Eligibility A sample of 40 FY2022 TANF cases was tested for compliance with the above criteria and the observations were noted below. ? 24 out of 40 cases files tested did not contain adequate documentation to verify eligibility requirements...
2022-Single Audit 02 Department of Social Services TANF Eligibility A sample of 40 FY2022 TANF cases was tested for compliance with the above criteria and the observations were noted below. ? 24 out of 40 cases files tested did not contain adequate documentation to verify eligibility requirements and approval of benefits. Approximately, 55% of the reviewed files lacked evidence that the workers verified the relationship between the minor children and the applicant and that the children were living in the home. ? 1 out of 40 case files tested, the assistance unit captured a child that was not living in the household, which inappropriately increased the monthly benefit amount. ? 1 out of the 40 cases tested did not contain evidence that the eligibility worker inquired about the applicant?s indication on the application that they were not in compliance with probation/sentencing terms prior to approving the application. Recommendations: ? We recommend that the Economic Support and Independence Deputy Director develop and implement a quality control process to ensure the required eligibility verifications are conducted and properly documented in the case files. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the finding. Action planned/taken in response to finding: All supervisors within the Economic Support & Independence Division of the Richmond Department of Social Services (RDSS) will be expected to complete a minimum of three case readings per month for each direct report assessing eligibility within the TANF program. In addition, all team members who assess TANF eligibility will be required to complete refresher trainings on uploading documents to the Document Management Imaging System (DMIS), Documentation and Verifications, and Application Processing, which will include categorical requirements and conditions of eligibility. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Sarah Raring & Tricia Wyatt Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2023 If there are any questions regarding this plan, please contact Sarah Raring at (804) 646-3332 or sarah.denhamraring@rva.gov.
In regard to the two students who were never reported as graduated, the College did in fact submit the required documentation to the National Student Clearinghouse (?NSC?) for further processing to the NSLDS, but the updates were reported as rejected due to errors by the NSLDS. The College has updat...
In regard to the two students who were never reported as graduated, the College did in fact submit the required documentation to the National Student Clearinghouse (?NSC?) for further processing to the NSLDS, but the updates were reported as rejected due to errors by the NSLDS. The College has updated the students' records on the NSC and will monitor the NSLDS portal weekly to ensure that all student updates are processed and correct on both the campus and program levels. In regard to the publication of the length of the Master?s level program, the College is revising its documentation and publication of the length of the Master?s program to reflect adjustments to the program that reduced the amount of time needed to complete the program. In addition, the College?s student information system was reviewed/updated to accurately reflect the published length for each program. To assure that the information is being transmitted correctly, the College will monitor the next six months of enrollment updates to ensure that each student, in the different programs, has the correct publication program length.
« 1 293 294 296 297 332 »