Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
61,799
In database
Filtered Results
23,815
Matching current filters
Showing Page
562 of 953
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: Questioned Costs
Finding Number 2023-003 – Student Financial Aid Cluster – Various ALN Numbers-Return of Title IV Funds (R2T4) Management’s Response The UPR concurs with this finding. UPR-Río Piedras campus did not return the funds to the federal government within 45 days from the official date of the student's to...
Finding Number 2023-003 – Student Financial Aid Cluster – Various ALN Numbers-Return of Title IV Funds (R2T4) Management’s Response The UPR concurs with this finding. UPR-Río Piedras campus did not return the funds to the federal government within 45 days from the official date of the student's total withdrawal because there was a delay on the part of the Registrar's Office in submitting the report of students who requested withdrawal to the Fiscal Office. From now on, RRP will follow the following procedures: 1. The Registrar’s Office will process immediately the requests for withdrawal submitted by students. The Technology Division will produce a report about such students. 2. The Technology Division will send the report to the Financial Aid Office and the Fiscal Office. 3. The Financial Aid Office will identify which students in the report received PELL or Direct Loan payments. 4. The Fiscal Office will prepare the R2T4 and will determine the amount to be returned to the federal government, if any. 5. The Finance Office will return the overpayments to the federal government on the G5 platform. 6. The Finance Office will establish a weekly protocol to notify and monitor the offices involved in this process (Registrar, Financial Aid, and Fiscal offices) through institutional mail. Also, UPR-Río Piedras will coordinate a meeting with the offices involved in this process to evaluate the situation and identify possible improvements to make it more effective. Responsible Person or Office: Registrar, Fiscal, and Financial Aid Offices at UPR-Río Piedras. Timeline: 2023-2024, so we will notice their effect starting in April 2024.
The Department has instituted additional internal controls to ensure that expenditures are liquidated within 90 days of the end of the period of performance as required. This includes a monthly reconciliation of all federal sources performed by the Grants Manager and reviewed by the respective Budg...
The Department has instituted additional internal controls to ensure that expenditures are liquidated within 90 days of the end of the period of performance as required. This includes a monthly reconciliation of all federal sources performed by the Grants Manager and reviewed by the respective Budget Manager and Finance Director to address any identified issues before the liquidation date. As a redundancy measure, the Budget Manager reviews AP contract activity associated with federal fund sources via the Provider Utilization Report to monitor the liquidation rate in correlation with the liquidation date to ensure all expenditures are captured within the period of performance. Post-liquidation date journal activity is mainly aligned with transactional code cleanup, not necessarily new expense posting outside the period of performance. As such, it doesn’t include or constitute changes to previously submitted federal reporting. To mitigate transactional errors, the Budget Manager, in coordination with the Grants Manager, thoroughly reviews the coding of procurement requests that utilize federal funds for the appropriateness of use and accuracy. This includes deactivating federal fund sources in the statewide accounting system to prevent transactions posting outside of the period of performance. These additional internal controls related to the period of performance were implemented in July 2023. The Office of Internal Audit will perform a review of the updated processes to ensure they are effective in correcting the above findings no later than March 31, 2024.
View Audit 298253 Questioned Costs: $1
The Department has instituted additional internal controls to ensure that expenditures are liquidated within 90 days of the end of the period of performance as required. This includes a monthly reconciliation of all federal sources performed by the Grants Manager and reviewed by the respective Budg...
The Department has instituted additional internal controls to ensure that expenditures are liquidated within 90 days of the end of the period of performance as required. This includes a monthly reconciliation of all federal sources performed by the Grants Manager and reviewed by the respective Budget Manager and Finance Director to address any identified issues before the liquidation date. As a redundancy measure, the Budget Manager reviews AP contract activity associated with federal fund sources via the Provider Utilization Report to monitor the liquidation rate in correlation with the liquidation date to ensure all expenditures are captured within the period of performance. Post-liquidation date journal activity is mainly aligned with transactional code cleanup, not necessarily new expense posting outside the period of performance. As such, it doesn’t include or constitute changes to previously submitted federal reporting. To mitigate transactional errors, the Budget Manager, in coordination with the Grants Manager, thoroughly reviews the coding of procurement requests that utilize federal funds for the appropriateness of use and accuracy. This includes deactivating federal fund sources in the statewide accounting system to prevent transactions posting outside of the period of performance. These additional internal controls related to the period of performance were implemented in July 2023. The Office of Internal Audit will perform a review of the updated processes to ensure they are effective in correcting the above findings no later than March 31, 2024.
View Audit 298253 Questioned Costs: $1
In February 2024, DCH and a third party executed a contract amendment which incorporates the required provisions per section 7.1.3 of the NCCI Technical Guidance Manual.
In February 2024, DCH and a third party executed a contract amendment which incorporates the required provisions per section 7.1.3 of the NCCI Technical Guidance Manual.
DCH completed most of the action items in the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) during fiscal year 2023 and has continued towards completion during fiscal year 2024. All identified security vulnerabilities have been addressed, which have significantly enhanced DCH’s overall cybersecurity posture. Key ac...
DCH completed most of the action items in the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) during fiscal year 2023 and has continued towards completion during fiscal year 2024. All identified security vulnerabilities have been addressed, which have significantly enhanced DCH’s overall cybersecurity posture. Key achievements include enhanced staffing (CISO, Cybersecurity Engineer, Senior Cybersecurity Analyst, and ten cybersecurity interns), and the introduction of 20 organization-wide security policies aligned with National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Federal Computer Security Standards. The closeout of the remaining CAP remediation tasks is set to be completed by the end of February 2024.
DCH has implemented the programming changes in Georgia Medicaid Management Information System (GAMMIS) to recoup capitation payments dating back to April 1, 2023 for members who were deemed retroactively eligible for Medicare. For any current Managed Care Organization (MCO) member that gets retroact...
DCH has implemented the programming changes in Georgia Medicaid Management Information System (GAMMIS) to recoup capitation payments dating back to April 1, 2023 for members who were deemed retroactively eligible for Medicare. For any current Managed Care Organization (MCO) member that gets retroactive Medicare coverage, that member’s MCO capitation payments are recouped back to the day before the effective date of the Medicare benefit or back to 4/1/23 whichever is later. A monthly report entitled MGD-4218-M captures the recoupment activity.
View Audit 298253 Questioned Costs: $1
DCH revised it contracts with its CMOs to include the following language: 8.6.2 The Contractor shall submit to DCH audited financial reports specific to this Contract on an annual basis. The audit must be conducted in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and generally accepted a...
DCH revised it contracts with its CMOs to include the following language: 8.6.2 The Contractor shall submit to DCH audited financial reports specific to this Contract on an annual basis. The audit must be conducted in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and generally accepted auditing standards. The above language was added to the DCH contract in June 2022.
Verbal direction was given initially in a meeting with the Contract Liaisons (construction auditors) and to the District Construction Managers to remind them that the Certified Payroll Review Form must be used. This will also be discussed at the District Construction Managers meeting in April and a ...
Verbal direction was given initially in a meeting with the Contract Liaisons (construction auditors) and to the District Construction Managers to remind them that the Certified Payroll Review Form must be used. This will also be discussed at the District Construction Managers meeting in April and a memo is being distributed to the District Construction Managers and Contract Liaisons reminding everyone of the process. Contract Liaisons who audit the projects for contract compliance have been informed to make sure the Certified Payroll Review Form is being used. The use of the form and proper procedure for checking payrolls will be verified each time the project is audited. The Contract Liaisons have also been informed to let each of the construction managers know to use the form. Payroll review will also be incorporated into the Contract Liaison’s annual training so that the construction staff will be reminded of the process and to also inform and educate new employees of the process. The procedures to be followed are outlined in the Construction Manual. (excerpt below) The Construction Manager shall complete the Certified Payroll Review Form for ALL payrolls reviewed. The Form shall be complete with any observed issues documented in as much detail as possible and shall be signed and dated by the Construction Manager. The Construction Manager should compare the wage rates listed on the payrolls to the applicable wage rates listed in the Contract based on the job title of the Contractors/Subcontractors employee. The Construction Manager should place comments or check marks by each employee on the Contractor’s/Subcontractor’s payrolls as they are reviewed, and wages compared. Once a set of payrolls has been reviewed, the Construction Manager will print their name and current date in the top right-hand corner of the payroll and initial.
GDOL acknowledges this is a repeated finding from previous years, therefore the Department concurs with this finding and offers the following response preceded by the auditor’s findings: Auditor’s Findings: The Department of Labor should improve internal controls over Employer Filed Unemployment ...
GDOL acknowledges this is a repeated finding from previous years, therefore the Department concurs with this finding and offers the following response preceded by the auditor’s findings: Auditor’s Findings: The Department of Labor should improve internal controls over Employer Filed Unemployment Compensation claims. GDOL Response: GDOL submits the following information as an overview of the employer filed claims program and actions that have been taken and will continue to address the findings as well as incorporate additional safeguards and available technological system controls in the new system: The Employer Filed Partial Claims (EFC) program originated in the late 1960’s and was designed to allow employers with short-term, temporary periods of lack of work for their employees to retain their workforce when work resumes. This is a program that many large manufacturers in Georgia rely on when they have temporary plant shutdowns and have for decades. When GDOL has attempted in the past to limit this program, we have met strong resistance from Georgia’s manufacturers. This program optimizes our ability to process and pay mass numbers of claims more quickly, such as what occurred at the beginning of the pandemic. EFCs may be filed by an employer for any complete pay-period week during which an otherwise full-time employee works less than full-time, due to lack of work only, and earns an amount not exceeding his/her unemployment insurance weekly benefit amount. Such claims shall not be submitted or allowed for vacation days regardless of whether such vacation days were requested by the employee or established by the employer. Effective March 19, 2020, a temporary, Emergency Rule 300-2-4-05(1), containing Rule 300-2-4-.09(1) was signed which required employers to electronically submit EFCs on behalf of their employees whenever it is necessary to temporarily reduce work hours or there was no work available for a short period due to the pandemic. Employers were allowed to file such claims for full and part-time employees whose earnings had been reduced. In July 2020, the Rule was sunset and employers were no longer required to file EFCs. By electing to submit EFCs on behalf of the individuals, the employer is responsible for attesting by an affidavit to the employment status and weekly earnings of the individual for the EFC submitted. The affidavit certifies that the employer has obtained earnings from other employment as well as other requirements must be completed before EFCs can be entered or uploaded for their employees. Individuals for which EFCs are submitted are considered to be still attached to the employer and are exempt from the requirement to register for employment services per Georgia Employment Security Law Rules 300-2-4-.02. Such individuals are not required to be nor certify on a weekly basis to be actively seeking work. Effective December 6, 2021, the EFC process was revised to require individuals (employees) to complete an EFC profile to include a real-time identity verification before payments can be made. Employers are responsible for submitting the request for the payment to certify to the individual’s employment status, but the individuals must certify their identity and personal information for the claim to be processed. Employees are notified when a claim is filed on their behalf and provided instructions for their portion of completing the EFC process. The MyUI Customer Portal dashboard provides all the EFC correspondence sent to the individual as well as the status of the profile setup and identify verification. Before the implementation of the EFC profile requirement, GDOL utilized the Social Security Administration (SSA) crossmatch and Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlement (SAVE) verification processes to verify the identity of claimants where employers submit claims on their behalf. When we identify employer fraud schemes, we follow the guidance issued by the United States Department of Labor (USDOL) and collaborate with the United States Department of Labor Office of Inspector General (OIG) to investigate these cases. Effective June 29, 2023, GDOL implemented additional Employer Filed Claims safeguards and security measures to reflect amended Georgia Employment Security Rule 300-2-4-.09. Employers must now meet the following conditions to submit Employer-Filed Partial Claims on behalf of their employees: • Employer accounts must have been registered with GDOL for more than 5 years. • Employers must be current on all quarterly tax and wage reports. • Employers must be current on all quarterly contribution taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest. • The week ending date on employer filed claims cannot be older than 30 days. The amended Georgia Employment Security Rule also clarifies that part-time employees are not eligible for Employer Filed Partial Claims. Summary: This finding will persist until a system-wide resolution is implemented in the new modernized UI system. GDOL will include a self-certification and dual certification process for employer filed claims in the new solution.
GDOL acknowledges this is a repeated finding from previous years, therefore the Department concurs with this finding and offers the following response preceded by the auditor’s findings: Auditor’s Findings: The Georgia Department of Labor did not have effective internal controls in place to ensur...
GDOL acknowledges this is a repeated finding from previous years, therefore the Department concurs with this finding and offers the following response preceded by the auditor’s findings: Auditor’s Findings: The Georgia Department of Labor did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure unemployment benefit payments were made correctly and only to eligible claimants. 1) Claimants did not self-certify for benefits in eighteen instances GDOL Response: Employer Filed Partial Claims (EFC) are submitted by employers on behalf of the claimant. The employer is responsible for attesting to the employment status and weekly earnings of the claimant for the EFC submitted. An affidavit certifying that the employer has obtained earnings from other employment as well as other requirements must be completed before EFCs can be entered or uploaded. Claimants for which EFCs are submitted are considered to be still attached to the employer and are exempt from the requirement to register for employment services per Georgia Employment Security Law Rule 300-2-4-.02. Such individuals are not required to be nor certify on a weekly basis to be able, available and actively seeking work. We recognize the state auditor's recommendations to add the self-certification. However, the current unemployment system is obsolete, having been put into production in 1982. This finding will persist until our new modernized unemployment insurance (UI) system is implemented in 2026. 2) Fraudulent employer-filed claims were filed for thirteen claimants GDOL Response: When we identify employer fraud schemes, we follow the guidance issued by the United States Department of Labor (USDOL) and collaborate with the United States Department of Labor Office of Inspector General (OIG) to investigate these cases. Additionally, we have taken the following measures to safeguard the system against fictitious employers: • Effective December 6, 2021, the Employer Filed Partial Claims (EFC) process was revised to require individuals (employees) to complete an EFC profile to include a real-time identity verification before payments can be made. Employers are responsible for submitting the request for the payment to certify to the individual’s employment status, but the individuals must certify their identity and personal information for the claim to be processed. Employees are notified when a claim is filed on their behalf and provided instructions for their portion of completing the EFC process. The MyUI Customer Portal dashboard provides all the EFC correspondence sent to the individual as well as the status of the profile setup and identify verification. • Before the implementation of the EFC profile requirement, GDOL utilized the Social Security Administration (SSA) crossmatch and Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlement (SAVE) verification processes to verify the identity of claimants where employers submit claims on their behalf. • Effective June 29, 2023, GDOL implemented additional employer filed claims safeguards and security measures to reflect amended Georgia Employment Security Rule 300-2-4-.09. Employers must now meet the following conditions to submit Employer Filed Partial Claims on behalf of their employees: o Employer accounts must have been registered with GDOL for more than 5 years. o Employers must be current on all quarterly tax and wage reports. o Employers must be current on all quarterly contribution taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest. o The week ending date on employer filed claims cannot be older than 30 days. The amended Georgia Employment Security Rule also clarifies that part-time employees are not eligible for Employer Filed Partial Claims. BPC and Integrity merit staff continue to establish pseudo claims when fraud is confirmed to relieve victims of liability and the fraudster is unknown. Otherwise, the payments are moved to the fraudsters claim account, if identified. GDOL has procured a vendor to build and implement a modernized UI system. We are also pursuing data analytics tools to expedite the identification and detection of fraudulent activities. These tools will also be incorporated into the modernized solution. 3) Proof of employment or self-employment or a valid offer to begin employment and proof of wages was not submitted by five Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) claimants. One of these claimants was not eligible to claim benefits in Georgia. GDOL Response: The claimants who established PUA entitlement with a weekly benefit amount greater than the minimum or later determined to not be eligible were based on wages entered by the claimant and/or wages reported by the employer. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act only required proof of wages to be submitted. If claimants did not submit proof, federal requirements only allowed for payment of the minimum weekly benefit amount and no disqualification of benefits. Claims established at a higher weekly benefit amount had to be reduced to the minimum amount if no proof was provided. To date, no proof has been provided by the claimants cited. The claims were reduced as appropriate. An overpayment has been established on all five claims identified for the difference in weekly benefit amount for weeks paid over the minimum amount under CARES and for the entire amount for weeks paid under Consolidated Appropriations Act (CAA)/American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). GDOL’s current UI Information Technology (IT) system was developed in 1982 using mainframe “legacy’ technology. Due to the system’s age and other limitations, many automated processes and corrections cannot be fixed and/or easily implemented. As such, many processes must be handled manually by staff. This includes reviewing all the PUA proof documents submitted to determine the validity and eligibility for each PUA claim. Based on the volume of workload and staff limitations, GDOL has been unable to quickly complete this manual review to correct the finding. It is anticipated this manual review will continue throughout the FY24 audit review period. Summary: GDOL’s limited technology resources will hinder our ability to update our current system to satisfy the state audit’s recommendation. Therefore, we acknowledge that this finding will persist until a system-wide resolution is implemented in the new modernized UI system. The new solution will include a self-certification and dual certification process for employer filed claims and include controls over eligibility determinations for current and future UI programs. GDOL greatly appreciates the feedback and recommendations and will consider this information in our endeavors to modernize our UI system and business processes.
View Audit 298253 Questioned Costs: $1
As noted by Georgia Department of Audits & Accounts (DOAA) in this finding, the corrective action, although implemented for the last quarter of F/Y 2023, was effective in dealing with this issue as no additional exceptions were identified in the tests performed by DOAA after the date of the correcti...
As noted by Georgia Department of Audits & Accounts (DOAA) in this finding, the corrective action, although implemented for the last quarter of F/Y 2023, was effective in dealing with this issue as no additional exceptions were identified in the tests performed by DOAA after the date of the corrective action being put into place. GDOL will continue to ensure that all current and future business practices follow the established policies and procedures of the Uniform Guidance, the U.S. Department of Labor, and the State of Georgia. When necessary, GDOL will modify its policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures reflect appropriate evidence of review and approval.
We concur with this finding. Although the Wagner-Peyser Program transitioned to TCSG in December of 2022, related activities also continued at GDOL. Staff at the career centers continued to serve Georgia taxpayers in need of employment services rather than turning them away. As a result, staff con...
We concur with this finding. Although the Wagner-Peyser Program transitioned to TCSG in December of 2022, related activities also continued at GDOL. Staff at the career centers continued to serve Georgia taxpayers in need of employment services rather than turning them away. As a result, staff continued to charge the Wagner-Peyser grant, and there were Wagner Peyser grant funds still remaining at GDOL. Journal vouchers were entered to allocate indirect costs to the Wagner-Peyser grant pursuant to GDOL's federally approved cost allocation plan. Journal vouchers were also used to correct other expenditures that should have been charged directly to Wagner Peyser. GDOL will ensure that all journal vouchers are properly supported by documentation, either attached directly to the journal voucher or the journal voucher will reference the supporting documentation which can be retrieved either electronically or manually.
View Audit 298253 Questioned Costs: $1
Condition - The District did not obtain debarment certification or document their vendor search in the System for Award Management website for vendors contracted in excess of $25,000 related to the grant program. Upon further review, it was determined that the vendors were not suspended or debarred....
Condition - The District did not obtain debarment certification or document their vendor search in the System for Award Management website for vendors contracted in excess of $25,000 related to the grant program. Upon further review, it was determined that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Plan - Policies and procedures will be implemented to document the verification that vendors are not suspended or debarred. Anticipated Date of Completion - June 30, 2024. Name of Contact Person - James Dunlap, Superintendent. Management Reponse - Management does not disagree with this finding. In future years, the District will document their verification that vendors are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business.
Name of contact person - Mr. Joseph Gudac, Business Manager Corrective Action - We will follow our policy f...
Name of contact person - Mr. Joseph Gudac, Business Manager Corrective Action - We will follow our policy for federal purchases subject to quotation/bid/sole source requirements moving forward. The district will follow the policy for obtaining three quotation/bid requirements for federal purchases. In the event purchases are made through cooperative purchasing programs, three quotes will be documented when federal purchases are disbursed. We also implemented processes to improve documentation relating to the “reason” and “cost analysis” of sole source noncompetitive procurement. Anticipated Completion Date - The District will implement the above procedure immediately.
View Audit 298250 Questioned Costs: $1
Corrective Steps: Will review and train staff to follow all purchasing processes and procedures. Will ensure segregation of duties between personnel that initiates a PO, paying the invoice and receiving goods. Completion date: Immediately. Plan for Monitoring: Monthly meeting with purchasing staf...
Corrective Steps: Will review and train staff to follow all purchasing processes and procedures. Will ensure segregation of duties between personnel that initiates a PO, paying the invoice and receiving goods. Completion date: Immediately. Plan for Monitoring: Monthly meeting with purchasing staff to ensure purchasing procedures are being followed.
View Audit 298241 Questioned Costs: $1
There is no disagreement with the audit finding. The Programs was struggling with turnovers and not knowing what entries were allocated correctly. Payables were entered in the accounting software from purchase orders which caused the reports to be inaccurately stated in the amount of $6,239.00. The ...
There is no disagreement with the audit finding. The Programs was struggling with turnovers and not knowing what entries were allocated correctly. Payables were entered in the accounting software from purchase orders which caused the reports to be inaccurately stated in the amount of $6,239.00. The unexpended funds will be returned to the Department of Health and Human Services to remain in compliance. Employee Responsible for Corrective Action: Michelle Clarke Completion Date: February 24, 2024
View Audit 298238 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding Number: 2023-001 Condition: The Medical Center's controls for reporting submissions did not identify that it had a reporting requirement deadline, and the report was submitted late. Planned Corrective Action: The grant administrator and accountant will review the contract for reporting requi...
Finding Number: 2023-001 Condition: The Medical Center's controls for reporting submissions did not identify that it had a reporting requirement deadline, and the report was submitted late. Planned Corrective Action: The grant administrator and accountant will review the contract for reporting requirements and add submission dates to work calendars with reminders. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Keith Poniers, CFO Anticipated Completion Date: This has been corrected
Management concurs with the audit findings and will review in detail the future Provider Relief Fund (PRF) reporting submissions. Regardless of the errors made in the initial reporting submission, the Hospital has sufficient lost revenues during the period of availability to support PRF payments.
Management concurs with the audit findings and will review in detail the future Provider Relief Fund (PRF) reporting submissions. Regardless of the errors made in the initial reporting submission, the Hospital has sufficient lost revenues during the period of availability to support PRF payments.
Finding 2023-001 – Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies – Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Amy Phillips Contact Phone Number: (765) 662-2546 ext 8070 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with the finding. Des...
Finding 2023-001 – Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies – Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Amy Phillips Contact Phone Number: (765) 662-2546 ext 8070 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: Marion Community Schools will establish an internal control system that will require review of all timesheets and payroll registers by the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) or the Assistant Chief Financial Officer (Asst CFO). Timesheets/payroll registers will be reviewed for any new or updated wage amounts and provide a second sign off documenting that these were reviewed and approved. The payroll employee should bring these forward for initial review, however, the CFO/Asst CFO will still review registers as a double check and to prevent errors. Payroll changes should be kept together for easy reference, as well as with the payroll file for the period in which the change was made. Anticipated Completion Date: Immediately
View Audit 298224 Questioned Costs: $1
We’ve updated processes to include documentation of risks associated with protecting customer data. Risk assessment documents and methodologies will be reviewed and updated in consultation with the Vice-President of Administration & Finance and the Director of Technology Services.
We’ve updated processes to include documentation of risks associated with protecting customer data. Risk assessment documents and methodologies will be reviewed and updated in consultation with the Vice-President of Administration & Finance and the Director of Technology Services.
Although we checked and double checked the information as shown in COD under the R2T4 section, there still appears to be an issue with regards to COD correctly showing Vacation time in COD. Going forward, we are actually printing out the R2T4's to ensure that the correct number of days are listed on...
Although we checked and double checked the information as shown in COD under the R2T4 section, there still appears to be an issue with regards to COD correctly showing Vacation time in COD. Going forward, we are actually printing out the R2T4's to ensure that the correct number of days are listed on the R2T4 sheet and maintaining hard copies in addition to saving online.
View Audit 298219 Questioned Costs: $1
The largest issue regarding student working when they are in class is communication. Faculty are supposed to alert the work office when they are cancelling class. However, they are only alerting the Provost about cancelling classes and they are keeping a calendar of cancelled classes. We will contin...
The largest issue regarding student working when they are in class is communication. Faculty are supposed to alert the work office when they are cancelling class. However, they are only alerting the Provost about cancelling classes and they are keeping a calendar of cancelled classes. We will continue to remind faculty that they must let the Work Office know directly when they cancel class. All managers have been informed that their workers cannot work during a class period unless the professor has emailed the work office. We are looking at new payroll vendors who may be able develop a system for student schedules and the payroll system to help integrate data so that we can access class schedules within the Payroll system and blackout periods where they cannot work.
View Audit 298219 Questioned Costs: $1
We agree with the finding, conclusion, and recommendation. We are in the process of developing an allowance for doubtful accounts, bad debt, and receivable estimates process to ensure we understand the receivables outstanding for period end. We will implement the quality control monitoring by April ...
We agree with the finding, conclusion, and recommendation. We are in the process of developing an allowance for doubtful accounts, bad debt, and receivable estimates process to ensure we understand the receivables outstanding for period end. We will implement the quality control monitoring by April 30, 2024.
We agree with the finding, conclusion, and recommendation. Implementing the quality control monitoring is an improvement opportunity for the Organization. We will implement the quality control monitoring by April 30, 2024.
We agree with the finding, conclusion, and recommendation. Implementing the quality control monitoring is an improvement opportunity for the Organization. We will implement the quality control monitoring by April 30, 2024.
Cluster name: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listings numbers and names: 84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants 84.033 Federal Work-Study Program 84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program 84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans Luisa Ott Anticipated completion date: June 30,...
Cluster name: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listings numbers and names: 84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants 84.033 Federal Work-Study Program 84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program 84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans Luisa Ott Anticipated completion date: June 30, 2024 The District agrees with the finding. After reviewing the student in the finding, the District reprocessed the Return of Title IV calculation. The one student record was updated and resulted in an amount of $8 to be returned to the student by offsetting their current balance with the District. The District will fund the reimbursement with institutional funds. During the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023, the District has created supporting automated processes to identify potential Return to Title IV accounts. The District has started the implementation project of using the student information system to automatically calculate student Return to Title IV calculations. The District will continue to strengthen procedures surrounding Return to Title IV compliance requirements.
View Audit 298169 Questioned Costs: $1
« 1 560 561 563 564 953 »