Audit 298189

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$1.73M
Findings
4
Programs
4
Organization: Cascade Community Healthcare (WA)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-03-26
Auditor: Mt View CPAS P S

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
385080 2022-002 Material Weakness - ABCGHL
385081 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - ABCGHL
961522 2022-002 Material Weakness - ABCGHL
961523 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - ABCGHL

Contacts

Name Title Type
KWD9H24R7ZP5 Kigham Bebekian Auditee
3608072431 Mitchell Merrill Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 1 - Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: See Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: See Note 4 - Indirect Cost Rate The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of Cascade Community Healthcare ("the Organization") under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with teh requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrtaive Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cashflows of the Organization.
Title: Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: See Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: See Note 4 - Indirect Cost Rate The pass-through agencies that provide funding to the Organization derive their support from various funding sources including federal, state and local. Therefore, expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported when the disbursement is received from teh pass-through entity. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in teh Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting.
Title: Notes 3 - Medicaid and Medicare Accounting Policies: See Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: See Note 4 - Indirect Cost Rate Uniform Guidance does not consider a state's Medicaid and Medicare payments to a nonfederal entity for providing patient care services ot eligible individuals to be expenditures of federal awards unless the state requires the funds to be treated as federal awards expended becasue the payments are on a cost-reimbursement basis.
Title: Note 4 - Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: See Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: See Note 4 - Indirect Cost Rate The Organization has elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance for all federal awards.

Finding Details

Criteria: Management must comply with its written quality control monitoring policy to remain in compliance as an auditee recipient. Conditions Found: The organization did not implement its formalized methodology for quality control monitoring related to financial reporting and grant compliance. Cause: Completing the quality control monitoring policy has been difficult to implement due to the turnover of key employees in the finance department. Effect: The effect of the above on the operation of the program is not known. Questioned costs: This section is not applicable as the compliance attributes that were tested were nonmonetary. Recommendation: We recommend that management enforce its current policy to ensure compliance with the contract requirements and documentation evidencing compliance is maintained. View of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding, conclusion, and recommendation. Implementing the quality control monitoring is an improvement opportunity for the Organization.
Criteria: Management should establish a well-defined process for integrating detail transactions (including initial postings, re-billings, and write-offs) posted in Credible (the Organization’s medical billing software) with transactions that are batch posted in QuickBooks Enterprise (the Organization’s nonprofit accounting software). The current process needs refinement to ensure consistency in data processing and accuracy of the general ledger. Conditions Found: Upon testing revenue, we found that revenue was understated in the current and prior periods leading to an understatement in accounts receivable and associated accounts. Management was recording revenue at 70% of the billing rate when rather the contract rate should have been billed. With a revolving two year collections window, estimated receivables were not being figured. Cause: The understatement was caused by recording contract revenue at a reduced rate based on billing and collectivity. The Organization’s process for managing this document flow is very labor intensive and requires coordination and follow through by Organization staff to ensure that transactions are reflected properly in both Credible and QuickBooks. As a result, modifications to the initial posting in QuickBooks arising from billing adjustments are not taking place. Effect: The Organization’s financial reporting will continue to contain a level of imprecision until the proper reporting procedure is implemented, tested and staff received ongoing training. Questioned costs: Not applicable as none of the client billing transactions that were selected involved federal financial assistance. Recommendation: We recommend that management mark their billing in Credible to contract rates and craft and implement a policy in writing that requires estimates within the collection period and monitored periodically (monthly, quarterly, or annually) in their accuracy. View of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding, conclusion, and recommendation. We are in the process of developing an allowance for doubtful accounts, bad debt, and receivable estimates process to ensure we understand the receivables outstanding for period end.
Criteria: Management must comply with its written quality control monitoring policy to remain in compliance as an auditee recipient. Conditions Found: The organization did not implement its formalized methodology for quality control monitoring related to financial reporting and grant compliance. Cause: Completing the quality control monitoring policy has been difficult to implement due to the turnover of key employees in the finance department. Effect: The effect of the above on the operation of the program is not known. Questioned costs: This section is not applicable as the compliance attributes that were tested were nonmonetary. Recommendation: We recommend that management enforce its current policy to ensure compliance with the contract requirements and documentation evidencing compliance is maintained. View of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding, conclusion, and recommendation. Implementing the quality control monitoring is an improvement opportunity for the Organization.
Criteria: Management should establish a well-defined process for integrating detail transactions (including initial postings, re-billings, and write-offs) posted in Credible (the Organization’s medical billing software) with transactions that are batch posted in QuickBooks Enterprise (the Organization’s nonprofit accounting software). The current process needs refinement to ensure consistency in data processing and accuracy of the general ledger. Conditions Found: Upon testing revenue, we found that revenue was understated in the current and prior periods leading to an understatement in accounts receivable and associated accounts. Management was recording revenue at 70% of the billing rate when rather the contract rate should have been billed. With a revolving two year collections window, estimated receivables were not being figured. Cause: The understatement was caused by recording contract revenue at a reduced rate based on billing and collectivity. The Organization’s process for managing this document flow is very labor intensive and requires coordination and follow through by Organization staff to ensure that transactions are reflected properly in both Credible and QuickBooks. As a result, modifications to the initial posting in QuickBooks arising from billing adjustments are not taking place. Effect: The Organization’s financial reporting will continue to contain a level of imprecision until the proper reporting procedure is implemented, tested and staff received ongoing training. Questioned costs: Not applicable as none of the client billing transactions that were selected involved federal financial assistance. Recommendation: We recommend that management mark their billing in Credible to contract rates and craft and implement a policy in writing that requires estimates within the collection period and monitored periodically (monthly, quarterly, or annually) in their accuracy. View of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding, conclusion, and recommendation. We are in the process of developing an allowance for doubtful accounts, bad debt, and receivable estimates process to ensure we understand the receivables outstanding for period end.