Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
61,799
In database
Filtered Results
23,815
Matching current filters
Showing Page
543 of 953
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: Questioned Costs
Finding 389854 (2023-002)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Funding Agency: Title: Assistance Listing Number: Compliance Requirement: Award Year: Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care 14.267 Special Tests and Provisions July I, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Condition: During our audit, we noted that Barrett Foundation had one of three tenants sampled who d...
Funding Agency: Title: Assistance Listing Number: Compliance Requirement: Award Year: Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care 14.267 Special Tests and Provisions July I, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Condition: During our audit, we noted that Barrett Foundation had one of three tenants sampled who did not have evidence that the rent reasonableness form was reviewed or approved. Criteria: Barrett Foundation has a policy that its process over the rent reasonableness requirement is for one employee to fill out a rent reasonableness form and the supervisor to review and approve it before any rent payments are made on behalf of the client. Effect: Barrett Foundation did not have evidence that it followed its policy over the rent reasonableness requirement. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Barrett Foundation did not file the signed version of the rent reasonableness form and only had the unsigned version to show for the audit. This was due to turnover and certain documents not being filed correctly. Auditors' Recommendation: We recommend that Barrett Foundation ensure that all signed documents are scanned into the Foundation's server to show evidence that all policies and procedures were followed. Management's Response: In FY23, Barrett Foundation experienced significant staffing shortages which resulted is Rent Reasonableness forms not being reviewed or signed. During FY24, Barrett Foundation audited all case files to address incomplete documentation. We also updated our standard operating procedures to indicate that rent reasonableness forms are completed annually as well as when a participant enters the programs, moves to a different unit, if there is a rent increase and that supervisors review and sign the form. Additionally, supervisors will begin conducting monthly random audits of client files to ensure that all required documentation is completed.
Finding 389851 (2023-001)
Significant Deficiency 2023
FINDING NUMBER I: 2023-001-Compliancc over Matching-(Significant Deficiency) Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: Title: Assistance Listing Number: Compliance Requirement: Award Year: Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care 14.267 Matching July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Condition: Dur...
FINDING NUMBER I: 2023-001-Compliancc over Matching-(Significant Deficiency) Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: Title: Assistance Listing Number: Compliance Requirement: Award Year: Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care 14.267 Matching July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Condition: During our audit, we noted that Barrett Foundation only matched 7 .34% of the total applicable expenses for the year which was less than the required 25%. Criteria: Barrett Foundation must match all applicable grant funds, with no less than 25 percent of cash or in-kind contributions from other sources (24 CFR section 578.73(a)). Effect: Barrett Foundation under matched the required amount for the Continuum of Care program. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Barrett Foundation did not establish a sufficient system of internal control to ensure that they were in compliance with the required match for the fiscal year. Auditors' Recommendation: We recommend that Barrett Foundation establish a system of internal controls to ensure that they provide at least 25% of both cash and in-kind contributions for all applicable programs under the Continuum of Care program. Management's Response: In FY23, Barrett Foundation transitioned from in-house financial services to an outside accounting firm. The transition allowed Barrett Foundation to create an internal structure to meet the needs of new programs. We recognize that while progress has been made, some issues continue to need attention. We arc working diligently with our community partners to meet their matching requirements and expect to not experience this issue in FY24. Additionally, we arc currently updating Barrett Foundation's Finance Policies in which we arc establishing policies to address contracts that require match.
Finding 2023-004: Lack of Documentation and Internal Controls for Federal Program Expenditures Identification of the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 17.259 - WIOA Youth Activities Program - U.S. Department of Labor. Pass-through Entity: New York City Department of Youth and Community Dev...
Finding 2023-004: Lack of Documentation and Internal Controls for Federal Program Expenditures Identification of the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 17.259 - WIOA Youth Activities Program - U.S. Department of Labor. Pass-through Entity: New York City Department of Youth and Community Development. Award Number: 90535A / 90536A / 90537A / 90538A. Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles. Criteria: Requirements per section 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E of the Uniform Guidance state that costs charged to federal awards must be determined in accordance with GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), be adequately documented, and be allocable to the federal award, and be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition: During our testing of 42 disbursements for the year ended June 30, 2023, we noted that there were 22 instances where there was a lack of adequate documentation, or the amount allocated to the major program could not be substantiated. Cause: With personnel changes at most levels within the Organization, documentation from the former employees could not be located, and the current employees were unfamiliar with the requirements of the federal awards. Effect or Potential Effect: Due to the lack of internal controls in this area, support for various expenditures could not be found, which could lead to costs being allocated improperly to the federal grants. Questioned Costs: $338,554 Context: In our testing sample, approximately 32% of total expenditures tested did not have proper documentation or the allocation to the federal award could not be provided. The potential error was extrapolated to the population leading to questioned costs of $338,554. Plan: 1. Internal Control Review: OBT conducted a thorough review of internal controls related to compliance with allowable cost principles, including the documentation of expenditures and allocation methodologies used. OBT has contracted with a new financial firm (BDO) familiar with government awards and allowable expenses. Each expense is now reviewed by two members of the executive team and the accounting contractor, making sure allocations are appropriately recorded in the GL (General Ledgers). 2. Documentation Enhancement: OBT has enhanced document retention procedures to ensure that all required documentation for federal program expenditures is adequately retained, including records of allocation methodologies. 3. Training and Awareness: OBT has provided training to all relevant personnel, especially those involved in expenditure documentation and allocation to ensure they understand the requirements of federal awards and the importance of proper documentation. 4. Documentation Verification: OBT has implemented procedures for ongoing verification and reconciliation of expenditures to ensure they are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. BDO has also shared best practices. 5. Continuous Monitoring: OBT is continuously monitoring compliance with allowable cost principles, identifying any gaps, and taking corrective actions as needed. . Name of Contact Person: Greg Rideout, Co-CEO Target Date: OBT implemented all five steps within this plan by December 31, 2023, with ongoing monitoring and improvement.
View Audit 300727 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 2023-003: Inadequate Documentation of Employee Time and Effort Allocation for Federal Program Identification of the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 17.259 - WIOA Youth Activities Program - U.S. Department of Labor. Pass-through Entity: New York City Department of Youth and Communi...
Finding 2023-003: Inadequate Documentation of Employee Time and Effort Allocation for Federal Program Identification of the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 17.259 - WIOA Youth Activities Program - U.S. Department of Labor. Pass-through Entity: New York City Department of Youth and Community Development. Award Number: 90535A / 90536A / 90537A / 90538A. Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles. Criteria: Requirements per section 2 CFR Part 200.430 of the Uniform Guidance state that charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition: During our testing for the year ended June 30, 2023, we noted a lack of detail for employee's actual hours spent on different programs. Time and effort are allocated based on budgeted amounts. Cause: Allocation to funding sources was entered into the payroll system based on budgeted estimates rather than actual time records. Effect or Potential Effect: The lack of contemporaneous documentation of employee hours worked by grant or federal program could allow the Organization to improperly allocate employee pay to federal grants. Questioned Costs: $65,379 Context: As most employees work specifically on a single program, there was only one employee that worked on multiple programs for which time spent on the program could not be substantiated. The total questioned cost allocated to the program for this person totaled $65,379. Plan: 1. Mandatory Time and Program Effort Records: OBT has implemented allocations by program in our payroll software. Hourly employees allocated to multiple programs will clock in and out for each program and all timecards are approved by management. Reports are reviewed every payroll for accuracy. 2. Training: OBT has provided training to all employees on the importance of accurate time and effort reporting for federal programs, ensuring that employees understand the requirements and their responsibilities in maintaining these records. 3. Internal Controls: OBT has implemented internal controls to review and verify the accuracy of time and effort records, ensuring that charges to federal awards comply with regulations. 4. Monitoring and Auditing: OBT conducts regular monitoring and internal audits to validate the accuracy and completeness of time and effort records. Name of Contact Person: Carla Licavoli, Chief Operating & Compliance Officer Target Date: OBT implemented all four steps within this plan by December 31, 2023, with ongoing monitoring and improvement.
View Audit 300727 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 2023-001 (UG) The Hospital chose to report under the alternative reporting methodology (option iii). Under this option, the Hospital submitted a memo describing its reasonable method of estimated revenues. The methodology described in the memo does not agree with the amounts the Hospital rep...
Finding 2023-001 (UG) The Hospital chose to report under the alternative reporting methodology (option iii). Under this option, the Hospital submitted a memo describing its reasonable method of estimated revenues. The methodology described in the memo does not agree with the amounts the Hospital reported in the portal. The Hospital’s calculated lost revenue under its alternative reporting methodology was approximately $420,000 overstated for 2020 quarter 1 and approximately $537,000 understated for 2020 quarter 2, which led to actual total lost revenue being approximately $117,000 more than the amount the Hospital reported in the PRF portal. Recommendation We recommend implementing controls to ensure amounts reported are accurate, complete and reviewed. Comments on the Finding and Recommendation Management is in agreement with this finding and the related recommendation. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding Management concurs with the finding and recommendation; however, lost revenues claimed would not have been materially different based on the finding.
Names of Responsible Individuals: Chad Wick, Director Financial Aid and Brian Emery, Associate Director Financial Aid Corrective Action: The Financial Aid office made several staffing changes in 2022-2023. The newly hired staff did not receive the proper training to perform their roles effectively. ...
Names of Responsible Individuals: Chad Wick, Director Financial Aid and Brian Emery, Associate Director Financial Aid Corrective Action: The Financial Aid office made several staffing changes in 2022-2023. The newly hired staff did not receive the proper training to perform their roles effectively. This led to errors identifying and calculating the unearned amount of Title IV assistance to be returned. The previous Financial Aid Director was terminated before the prior corrective action plan could be fully completed. New leadership, in collaboration with the Office of Information Technology, has developed an automated weekly report confirming student withdrawal dates. The report is scheduled to be emailed to Financial Aid office every Friday. The Financial Aid Director reviews the report and identifies Title IV recipients. The return of title IV funds calculation would be performed for those students. Any funds required to be disbursed or returned would then be processed. Anticipated Completion Date: February 28, 2024
View Audit 300714 Questioned Costs: $1
Names of Responsible Individuals: Brian Emery, Associate Director Financial Aid and Chad Wick, Director Financial Aid Corrective Action: During the 2023 and 2024 fiscal years, the Financial Aid office experienced several staffing changes, including the termination of the Financial Aid Director. The ...
Names of Responsible Individuals: Brian Emery, Associate Director Financial Aid and Chad Wick, Director Financial Aid Corrective Action: During the 2023 and 2024 fiscal years, the Financial Aid office experienced several staffing changes, including the termination of the Financial Aid Director. The newly hired staff did not receive the proper training to perform their roles effectively. This led to errors in verifying certain data when performing verification. The previous Financial Aid Director was terminated before the prior corrective action plan could be completed. In March 2023, a consultant firm was engaged to assist with the 2024 fiscal year. The Financial Aid office will implement a Quality Assurance two-step verification process. The financial aid advisor will work with the student to gather necessary documents and perform the original verification. The Associate Director of Financial Aid will review these verifications and update them in Colleague to be transmitted to COD for corrections if needed. The Financial Aid office will run a report to identify all students selected for verification for 2023- 2024 and review them for accuracy. If any corrections are needed they will be updated and awards will be adjusted as needed. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2024.
View Audit 300714 Questioned Costs: $1
Names of Responsible Individuals: Chad Wick, Director Financial Aid and Brian Emery, Associate Director Financial Aid Corrective Action: The University will transition from a manual awarding process to an automated process. The Financial Aid office was awarding this manually which led to mistakes wh...
Names of Responsible Individuals: Chad Wick, Director Financial Aid and Brian Emery, Associate Director Financial Aid Corrective Action: The University will transition from a manual awarding process to an automated process. The Financial Aid office was awarding this manually which led to mistakes when ISIR data changed or other awards were added or removed. FSEOG funds were used to assist students to pay off balances allowing them to register for the next semester. During the 2023 and 2024 fiscal years the Financial Aid office experienced several staffing changes including the termination of the Financial Aid Director. In March 2023, a consultant firm was engaged to assist with the 2024 fiscal year. The Financial Aid office will review all 2023-2024 FSEOG awards to ensure that student aid is calculated, awarded and disbursed correctly. The Financial Aid office will run a Fund Management Report to obtain a list of all students who were awarded FSEOG and compare that to the Pell Fund Management Report. This will ensure that all students who received FSEOG funds were also awarded Pell. The Financial Aid office will then review the amounts of the FSEOG awards to make sure no one was awarded more than the maximum threshold. The Financial Aid office will review the COA calculation for each student awarded FSEOG to verify that it was calculated correctly. For 2024-2025 the Financial Aid office has modified the packaging rules to automate the packaging of FSEOG which will eliminate any manual changes to the award. This should ensure that only students eligible for the award receive it and the amount is correct. The Financial Aid office has also modified the setup of their Student Information System for 2024-2025 so that the COA will be automatically calculated which should eliminate the need for any manual calculating of COA and eliminate improperly calculated COAs. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2024
View Audit 300714 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding Number: 2023-002 Planned Corrective Action: Cleveland Play House had extensive turnover during the 2022 and 2023 fiscal years which resulted in several vacancies, including the Director of Finance position, for a significant portion of the year. As a result, many of the reports that are stan...
Finding Number: 2023-002 Planned Corrective Action: Cleveland Play House had extensive turnover during the 2022 and 2023 fiscal years which resulted in several vacancies, including the Director of Finance position, for a significant portion of the year. As a result, many of the reports that are standard practice in our organization were not being completed. In addition, the filing of certain documentation to support expenditures was not being done consistently. The Director of Finance position was not filled until November 2022. As a result, documentation of allowable expenditures is being addressed for the fiscal 2023 audit. In addition to turnover, the organization transitioned to a new general ledger system with a new chart of accounts in fiscal year 2022. As a result of this transition and the vacancies mentioned above, certain data pertaining to the federal programs was not being captured. Management has informed all staff of the requirements to track federal programs within the general ledger accounts. Anticipated Completion Date: September 30, 2024 Responsible Contact Person: Erica Tkachyk, Director of Finance
View Audit 300711 Questioned Costs: $1
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The Authority acknowledges that this error occurred. When we identified this issue, we contacted the grantor agency for guidance. They explained how to submit a refund and acknowledged that since the grant was still open, we had the ab...
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The Authority acknowledges that this error occurred. When we identified this issue, we contacted the grantor agency for guidance. They explained how to submit a refund and acknowledged that since the grant was still open, we had the ability to correct an incorrect draw. This refund has been processed and the Authority has put additional internal controls in place to ensure the proper match is calculated for each grant draw in the future. Additionally, upon final grant closeout, all the numbers are verified and reconciled back to the grant agreement, including the match.
AUDITEE’S CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN As required by Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG), the Jackson Public School District has prepared and hereby submits the following corrective a...
AUDITEE’S CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN As required by Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG), the Jackson Public School District has prepared and hereby submits the following corrective action plan for the findings included in the Schedule of Findings and Questioned Cost for the year ended June 30, 2023: Finding 2023-001 Corrective Action Plan Details A.    Contact person responsible for corrective action: Name: Marc Rowe Title: Executive Director B.    Description of corrective action planned: The district will implement and strengthen its internal control systems over reporting and submitting its monthly claims for reimbursement to ensure claims are submitted within established reporting deadlines. C.    Anticipated completion date of corrective action: 6/30/2024
Condition: The Indian Child Protection and Family Violence Prevention Act requires Indian tribes and tribal organizations that receive funds under the ISDEAA or the Tribally Controlled Schools Act to conduct an investigation of the character of each individual who is employed or is being considered ...
Condition: The Indian Child Protection and Family Violence Prevention Act requires Indian tribes and tribal organizations that receive funds under the ISDEAA or the Tribally Controlled Schools Act to conduct an investigation of the character of each individual who is employed or is being considered for employment in a position that involves regular contact with, or control over, Indian children. In addition, background investigations must be completed every five years and adjudicated by an adjudicating official with proper training and credentials. The adjudicator must have a current adjudicated background check on file. Recommendation: We recommend the School implement an independent review of the background check files at least annually to ensure background check files are being properly completed, updated and maintained. The adjudicator must themselves have a independent clean adjudication on file with the School. Response: The School Board will implement a plan to complete an independent annual review of all background check files to ensure background checks are being properly completed, updated and maintained. We will also assure the adjudicator has a completed current adjudication on file. ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE: June 30, 2024 PERSON(S) RESPONSIBLE: Monica Whirlwind Horse, Principal and the School Board
Management will continue to accumulate proper supporting documentation to support their compliance with the eligibility compliance requirement and to provide such documentation, when legally possible. Responsible party: Cynthia Amodeo, CEO Myra Ricard, Program Director Anticipated Completion Dat...
Management will continue to accumulate proper supporting documentation to support their compliance with the eligibility compliance requirement and to provide such documentation, when legally possible. Responsible party: Cynthia Amodeo, CEO Myra Ricard, Program Director Anticipated Completion Date: uncertain at this time due to existing New York State law.
Charter School Program - Assistance Listing No. 84.282 Recommendation: We recommend the School ensure policies and procedures for payroll expenditures for grant programs be charged to the federal grant based on approved hours worked in the program. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: The...
Charter School Program - Assistance Listing No. 84.282 Recommendation: We recommend the School ensure policies and procedures for payroll expenditures for grant programs be charged to the federal grant based on approved hours worked in the program. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Options Schools, Inc. will implement policies and procedures for payroll expenditures charged to federal grant programs that track approved time worked. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Jack Colwell Planned completion date for corrective action plan: July 1, 2023
View Audit 300666 Questioned Costs: $1
Finance and Payroll management acknowledge that the unique Community Services payroll policies no longer reflect the current process related to payroll approvals. Sheppard Pratt and all subsidiaries have a standard payroll effective July 2023, and the organization will rely on this policy which is r...
Finance and Payroll management acknowledge that the unique Community Services payroll policies no longer reflect the current process related to payroll approvals. Sheppard Pratt and all subsidiaries have a standard payroll effective July 2023, and the organization will rely on this policy which is reflective of the current process for Fiscal Year 2023 and going forward. Finance and leadership will continue to communicate the importance of program leaderships review of timekeeping.
This was noted in last year's audit but was identified late in the fiscal year. The time required to do the due diligence and implementation was part of our timesheet review system was not fixed until after June 2023. As noted in last year's goal, Sewall administration completed a review of payroll ...
This was noted in last year's audit but was identified late in the fiscal year. The time required to do the due diligence and implementation was part of our timesheet review system was not fixed until after June 2023. As noted in last year's goal, Sewall administration completed a review of payroll companies and committed on a new system that began in October 2023. Along with that, we have organized a new internal system of tracking staff's time given the complexities of the many blended funding sources. We have also implemented a regular review and supervision of time sheet allocations.
View Audit 300657 Questioned Costs: $1
Program: COVID-19 Health Center Program Cluster Assistance Listing No.: 93.224 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed-through: N/A Award No. and Year: Various Compliance Requirements: Special Tests and Provisions Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control ov...
Program: COVID-19 Health Center Program Cluster Assistance Listing No.: 93.224 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed-through: N/A Award No. and Year: Various Compliance Requirements: Special Tests and Provisions Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Non-Compliance Department’s Management Response: Health Care Agency (HCA) management agrees with the recommendation to strengthen the established policies and procedures to ensure that the sliding fee discount program schedules are applied to patient charges consistent with its sliding fee discount schedule, and to ensure that County personnel strictly adheres to policies and procedures. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action: HCA management recognizes that the sliding fee discount schedule/discount grid established in 2020 was complex and may have contributed to errors in adjustments. A new fee schedule was developed in 2023 to establish flat fees that are more inclusive of services. The grid established in 2020 was in effect until the new grid was approved by the Board of Supervisors on March 15, 2023. Most of the encounters selected for review were encounters dated prior to the new grid’s effective date. HCA management has strengthened its sliding fee policy and procedure, approved by the Board of Supervisor on March 15, 2023. HCA management will implement the following internal control process to ensure that adjustments are consistent with the sliding fee discount program fee schedule: 1. All Medical Billing Specialists responsible for enrolling patients into the sliding fee program will be retrained on eligibility and adjustments. 2. To ensure that patients have received the correct adjustment, we will run a report of all patients under the sliding fee program with at least one encounter, year to date. All applications, proof of income, program eligibility, and adjustments will be reviewed for each patient. Corrections will be made, if applicable. 3. For the remaining of FY 22/23, a monthly report of all encounters under the sliding fee discount program will be pulled and reviewed monthly for accuracy. Corrections will be made and staff will be trained, as needed. 4. Starting in FY 23/24, a random sampling of sliding fee discount program encounters per Federally Qualified Health Center will be audited monthly to ensure accuracy and timely adjustment of encounters. Results will be trended to address any additional process improvements. COUNTY OF VENTURA, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023 6 Name of Responsible Persons: Lizeth Barretto, Ambulatory Care COO – Ms. Barretto will ensure that the activities listed in the Corrective Action Plan are executed until an Ambulatory Care CFO and/or Ambulatory Care Patient Revenue Manager is hired. Ambulatory Care CFO (Vacant) – Establishes sliding fee discount program policy, procedures, and fee schedules. Ambulatory Care Patient Revenue Manger (Vacant) – Responsible for the oversight of the Medical Billing Specialists responsible for sliding fee discount eligibility and adjustments. Implementation Date: April 15, 2024, Training of Medical Billing Specialists and monthly encounter review and corrections. April 22, 2024, Year to date report and internal audit August 5, 2024, Monthly sampling of encounters
Special Education Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 84.IDEA Recommendation: We recommend management implement procedures to ensure that salaries charged to the grant are appropriate and are supported by the required time and effort support and that a consistent policy is applied. Explanation of disag...
Special Education Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 84.IDEA Recommendation: We recommend management implement procedures to ensure that salaries charged to the grant are appropriate and are supported by the required time and effort support and that a consistent policy is applied. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Moving forward all Time & Efforts Records for federal grant funded positions will be on a single schedule (December and June) of each calendar year and tracked by each program department with support from administrative assistants. All forms will be collected electronically and remain on file in one central location in the Finance Department through Grants. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Shelly Chin – Administrator of Communications, Grants, Partnerships & Strategy Planned completion date for corrective action plan: This will be an ongoing procedure that will be implemented immediately.
View Audit 300631 Questioned Costs: $1
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: Areas of focus will be to update the grant policy manual and provide training to all staff of the College to be sure that the policies contained within are adhered to. Our objectives will be that all current and incoming staff will be pro...
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: Areas of focus will be to update the grant policy manual and provide training to all staff of the College to be sure that the policies contained within are adhered to. Our objectives will be that all current and incoming staff will be provided training on adhering to the policies within and proper approvals. Documentation of approvals can be achieved through our current accounting system and purchasing system. Staff has been briefed and is already working through that process of approvals by putting information through the accounting system. Measurable targets will be achieved by having a requisition and purchase order issued prior to purchase to provide a documentation trail of proper approvals and thus payment. This provides a documentation trail of approvals.
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: Areas of Focus will be in the documentation of polices and procedures to provide clear expectations of internal control documentation used to complete the drawdowns from the Department of Education and for a process of record retention. O...
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: Areas of Focus will be in the documentation of polices and procedures to provide clear expectations of internal control documentation used to complete the drawdowns from the Department of Education and for a process of record retention. Our objective would be to formalized the policies and procedures be updated in the Financial Aid policy manual with shared access between the Financial Aid office who approves the aid, the Business Office who ultimately pulls down from the Department of Education, and with the Cashier who distributes any refunds. We have put in place an electronic folder with restricted access to provide confidentiality and provide documentation of the shared communication between offices. The POISE system already generates a listing of students. That workflow will be amended to retain that documentation to be available. Measurable targets will be to do this weekly or as batches are prepared for draw-down. This documentation will be found in the shared electronic folder, which has already been implemented. The transfer of student records into the financial system is being done weekly and documentation is retained of students for which transactions occur.
1.) Finding 2023-001 Data Collection Form Submission Delay a. Program Information: N/A b. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.512(a)(1), the audit package and the data collection form shall be submitted 30 days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or 9 months after the end of the fiscal year whichever come...
1.) Finding 2023-001 Data Collection Form Submission Delay a. Program Information: N/A b. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.512(a)(1), the audit package and the data collection form shall be submitted 30 days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or 9 months after the end of the fiscal year whichever comes first. c. Condition: For the year ended June 30, 2021, the audit package and data collection form was not submitted within the required timeline. Response: Explanation: The delay in submitting our annual audited financial statements was due to significant transitions within the MHAAO finance team. In the first half of FY23, we faced the departure of our contract accountant and then Finance Director, leaving substantial parts of the audit work incomplete. With only one staff accountant, we faced challenges in making progress on audit deliverables. After my appointment as the new Finance Director in February 2023, we encountered further delays due to our previous audit partner's scheduling difficulties. This led us to engage with Aldrich Advisors, who committed to completing the FY22 audit for us within the calendar year 2023. Corrective Action: To address the lack of capacity on the MHAAO finance team, we successfully hired three new positions by the beginning of FY24: a Payroll Specialist, Accounts Payable Specialist, and an experienced Accounting Manager. We also recently promoted our Staff Accountant to a Senior Financial Analyst role, in charge of grants, contracts and compliance. We now have a strong and capable team to strengthen our internal financial processes and implement best practices in nonprofit financial management. To address this finding comprehensively, we have also implemented a new policy with two key components: - A centralized tracking system for reporting deadlines, maintained by myself, our Accounting Manager, and our Senior Financial Analyst. - Enhanced communication protocols for required submissions, including immediate communication with our audit team and funding partners in case of potential delays. Future Measures: Integration of these measures into our internal financial management policies and procedures, ensuring consistent application and preventing future delays. Contact person responsible for corrective action: John Domingo, Finance & IT Director Completion date: 10/17/2023
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN January 22, 2024 U.S. Department of Education Richmond Area Multi-Services, Inc. (RAMS) respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2023 Name and address of independent public accounting firm: Lindquist, von Husen & Joyce, LLP 301 Howa...
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN January 22, 2024 U.S. Department of Education Richmond Area Multi-Services, Inc. (RAMS) respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2023 Name and address of independent public accounting firm: Lindquist, von Husen & Joyce, LLP 301 Howard Street Suite 850 San Francisco, CA 94105 Audit period: July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 The findings from the December 20, 2023 schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the numbers in the schedule. FINDING - FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS AUDIT CA DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION Finding no. 2023-001: Allowable Cost Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code Part 200.430(i)(1)(vii) requires that there is documentation of personnel expenses charged to the grant, including support to reflect the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one award. Condition: Certain salary amounts billed to the grant were incorrectly allocated, hence overstating the salary billed to the grant. One employee’s salary was allocated 25% to the major program (AL #84.126) from their date of hire in April 2023. Through June 2023, whereas the allocation should have been 2.5% resulting in a $3, 227 over-charge. Another employee hired in June 2023 worked 80.23% for the same major program, but the program was billed for 100% of their salary, resulting in $865 over-charge. Cause: RAMS miscalculated the salary amount that should be charged to the grant which caused the overstatement of their cost-reimbursement billing due to using incorrect time allocation. Effect: Salary costs charged to the program that were unsupported in accordance with allowable cost principles. Questioned Costs: The total amount of salary tested during the audit was $66,576, representing approximately 10% of salary charges to the major program. The amount of questioned costs identified above in relation to the total amount sampled was 6.15% Auditor’s Recommendation: RAMS should consider creating appropriate procedure to monitor salary allocation calculations and ensure that all costs billed are supported by adequate documentation. Action Taken: Subsequent to year-end, RAMS changed its billing procedure to prevent over-billing or inaccurate allocation of payroll costs by adapting a cost allocation method based on the actual hours reported by employee and not the estimated ours used in preparation of the budget. On July 24, 2023, the program manager, division director, billing specialist and finance manage met to review and implement new billing procedure. The effective date of this change was July 1, 2023. If the U.S. Department of Education has questions regarding this plan, please call Eduard Agajanian at 408-394-8778. Sincerely yours, Eduard Agajanian, CFO Richmond Area Multi-Services, Inc.
View Audit 300609 Questioned Costs: $1
Two staff members were assigned the responsibility and access to EDExpress, which allows the college to send and receive files (including ISIRs) between college and federal databases. Both employees were placed on immediate and unanticipated leave in March 2023, leaving interim staff without the acc...
Two staff members were assigned the responsibility and access to EDExpress, which allows the college to send and receive files (including ISIRs) between college and federal databases. Both employees were placed on immediate and unanticipated leave in March 2023, leaving interim staff without the access or authority to perform these functions. It took some time to update the school’s online access and we were instructed to start using a different software, EDconnect, since EDExpress was becoming obsolete. Administration rights and training were then given to interim staff on uploading ISIRs into the FA system (SAM), and written procedures were developed. In the case cited here, the student was paid just as the staffing and access issues occurred. Updated records were not downloaded until after access to EDconnect was implemented and staff received guidance on the correct procedure. Initially, the student’s file did not require verification prior to payment, but changes made to their FAFSA generated ISIR #2 which resulted in a new request for verification. This update was received late due to the access and software issue. Since that time, we have developed written procedures on this process and trained additional staff. We have also created a new awarding and disbursement process and timeline, including required reconciliation of COD authorizations versus student awards and disbursements. This ensures students are properly awarded and disbursed, and that records between the two systems match. Uploads and downloads are now performed multiple times per week to ensure records are frequently updated. In addition, the Financial Aid Office transition from the SAM to the Colleague Financial System will automate these functions to run daily, eliminating the need for manual uploads and downloads of data between the systems. Staff absences will no longer impact the timely updating of records.
Finding 389683 (2023-001)
Significant Deficiency 2023
The City has studied its existing procedures and Information Technology (IT) resources in relation to the three noted exceptions. We have identified how the City’s procedures for inspectors lead to the exceptions and the conditions that allowed for the documentation and evidence of resolved inspecti...
The City has studied its existing procedures and Information Technology (IT) resources in relation to the three noted exceptions. We have identified how the City’s procedures for inspectors lead to the exceptions and the conditions that allowed for the documentation and evidence of resolved inspection failures to be insufficient: • Since 2017, the City has served as a demonstration agency for what is now HUD’s final National Standards for the Physical Inspection of Real Estate (NSPIRE). The purpose of the demonstration was to conduct Housing Quality Standards (HQS) inspections and inspections under the test protocol simultaneously, with some inspectors using HQS and some inspectors using the test standards. The test standards were conducted using electronic devices so the inspection results could be communicated to HUD, and the HQS inspections continued to be documented using HUD Form 52580. • Utilizing two methodologies for inspection documentation over a time span of greater than five years lead to inconsistent training of new staff, and inconsistent methods and expectations for documenting failed inspection results and follow up. • This condition was exacerbated in Calendar Year 2021 and 2022 when the City began the “catch-up” inspections required by HUD after the COVID-19 inspection waivers. To resolve these issues and correct the conditions going forward, the City will: • Design and implement an inspection application (app) to be used on the inspectors’ mobile devices. The app will be based on HUD’s new NSPIRE Inspection Tool and Checklist. This document has not been assigned a HUD Form number, but is available for review on HUD’s NSPIRE website. The app will be functional on mobile devices even when there is no cellular signal or WiFi connectivity by storing the data, which will be downloaded by the inspector. • The app will include the following features to ensure that documentation is completed properly and timely: - An electronic signature will be required for all inspections, regardless of whether the inspection passed or failed. - An auto-generated summary report of the day’s failed inspections will be emailed to the Supervisors and to the inspector who completed the failed inspection. The report will include the family and owner name, the unit address, identification of the failed items, to whom the responsibility for resolving the failed item is assigned (either family or owner), and the deadline by which the failed items must be resolved. - An auto-generated letter to the family and owner will be mailed and/or emailed within 2 business days of the completed inspection. The letter will include the family and owner name, the unit address, identification of the failed items, to whom the responsibility for resolving the failed item is assigned (either family or owner), the deadline by which the failed items must be resolved, and the potential date of termination if the failed inspection is not resolved. This letter will replace the Failed Inspection Memo which is currently being used by the City to communicate inspection failures. - The app will send email notifications to the Supervisors and inspector beginning 10 days in advance of the repair deadline reminding them that the inspection has not been resolved. - The inspector will use the app to document the resolution of the inspection by indicating what evidence the inspector used to demonstrate the repaired/resolved item. - The inspector will use the app to assign an extension of the deadline when necessary and appropriate. - If a failed inspection has not passed by the deadline or extension, the app will alert the inspector and Supervisor to either document the resolved inspection items or begin the termination process. The City believes that automating these aspects of the failed inspection procedures will prevent the conditions noted in the audit findings by streamlining documentation for the inspectors, alerting supervisors of failed inspections, and providing a consolidated report across all inspectors that can be reviewed regularly. The City has already started the inspection app design process with the IT department, capitalizing and expanding on an existing app that inspectors use for scheduling inspections. When the inspection app is ready to test, the lead inspector, Sylvia Coombs, will begin using it immediately and communicate any feedback to Elizabeth Durham, Rebecca Lane and the IT department. The City anticipates the app will be ready for testing by March 31, 2024. When the app has been tested and refined, Sylvia Coombs and Elizabeth Durham will train the staff in its use and communicate the requirement and expectation that the app is replacing the paper HUD Form 52580 and the Failed Inspection Memo. This change will be implemented by April 30, 2024. Elizabeth Durham and Rebecca Lane will be responsible for monitoring the results of these changes. Responsible Party: Elizabeth Durham Acting Manager Housing and Community Services Department Rebecca Lane Program Specialist Housing and Community Services Department Anticipated Implementation Date: April 30, 2024
View Audit 300589 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 389665 (2023-002)
Material Weakness 2023
2023-002 Family Violence Prevention and Services/Discretionary – Assistance Listing No. 93.592 Recommendation: Update procurement policy to be compliant with Uniform Guidance.. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response t...
2023-002 Family Violence Prevention and Services/Discretionary – Assistance Listing No. 93.592 Recommendation: Update procurement policy to be compliant with Uniform Guidance.. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Our audit identified a weakness in our policy surrounding procurement. CFR 200.318 states the non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in Uniform Guidance CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. We will align our spending thresholds and policy language with that Uniform Guidance. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Richard Seymour, Finance Director Planned completion date for corrective action plan: By May 10, 2024
« 1 541 542 544 545 953 »