Audit 300726

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$1.07M
Findings
2
Programs
3
Organization: Delta Memorial Hospital (AR)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-03-29
Auditor: Forvis LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
389842 2023-001 Material Weakness Yes ABL
966284 2023-001 Material Weakness Yes ABL

Contacts

Name Title Type
ZWPZB3TYYDK4 Jeremy Capps Auditee
8703828267 David Coleman Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Delta Memorial Hospital, Inc. has elected not to use the 10 % de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the enterprise fund of Delta Memorial Hospital, Inc. under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Delta Memorial Hospital, Inc., it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, change in net position or cash flows of the enterprise fund of Delta Memorial Hospital, Inc.

Finding Details

Criteria: Reporting (45 CFR 75.342) and Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Cost Principles (Pub. L. No. 116-136, 134 Stat. 563 and Pub. L. No 115-139, 134 Stat. 622 and 623) Condition: The Hospital’s portal reporting submission included errors. Questioned Costs: None Context: The Hospital chose to report under the alternative reporting methodology (option iii). Under this option, the Hospital submitted a memo describing its reasonable method of estimated revenues. The methodology described in the memo does not agree with the amounts the Hospital reported in the portal. The Hospital’s calculated lost revenue under its alternative reporting methodology was approximately $420,000 overstated for 2020 quarter 1 and approximately $537,000 understated for 2020 quarter 2, which led to actual total lost revenue being approximately $117,000 more than the amount the Hospital reported in the PRF portal. Effect: The report submitted in the PRF portal does not agree to the Hospital’s alternative reporting methodology, and quarterly lost revenues were improperly reported. Cause: The Hospital’s internal controls were not adequate to detect these reporting errors. Identification as a Repeat Finding: 2021-001. Recommendation: We recommend implementing controls to ensure amounts reported are accurate, complete and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs with the finding and recommendation; however, the errors did not result in materially different lost revenues claimed.
Criteria: Reporting (45 CFR 75.342) and Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Cost Principles (Pub. L. No. 116-136, 134 Stat. 563 and Pub. L. No 115-139, 134 Stat. 622 and 623) Condition: The Hospital’s portal reporting submission included errors. Questioned Costs: None Context: The Hospital chose to report under the alternative reporting methodology (option iii). Under this option, the Hospital submitted a memo describing its reasonable method of estimated revenues. The methodology described in the memo does not agree with the amounts the Hospital reported in the portal. The Hospital’s calculated lost revenue under its alternative reporting methodology was approximately $420,000 overstated for 2020 quarter 1 and approximately $537,000 understated for 2020 quarter 2, which led to actual total lost revenue being approximately $117,000 more than the amount the Hospital reported in the PRF portal. Effect: The report submitted in the PRF portal does not agree to the Hospital’s alternative reporting methodology, and quarterly lost revenues were improperly reported. Cause: The Hospital’s internal controls were not adequate to detect these reporting errors. Identification as a Repeat Finding: 2021-001. Recommendation: We recommend implementing controls to ensure amounts reported are accurate, complete and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs with the finding and recommendation; however, the errors did not result in materially different lost revenues claimed.