Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
48,654
In database
Filtered Results
7,124
Matching current filters
Showing Page
53 of 285
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: Questioned Costs
Views of Responding Officials: The Department agrees with the finding and will implement corrective action. Corrective Action Taken or Planned: The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (“TANF”) Program Office will continue to issue reminders to the eligibility staff, focusing on specific topic...
Views of Responding Officials: The Department agrees with the finding and will implement corrective action. Corrective Action Taken or Planned: The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (“TANF”) Program Office will continue to issue reminders to the eligibility staff, focusing on specific topics and common errors such as, but not limited to, incorrect calculations, policy applications, and determinations. The division has implemented a strategy to address the backlog which caused some TANF applications to be processed beyond the 45 day timeframe. The strategy includes dedicating a group of eligibility staff to the statewide call center where most applicants and recipients are requested to call to complete their eligibility interviews. Completion Date: December 31, 2025 Responding Official(s): Catherine Scardino, Benefit, Employment, and Support Services Division Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program Administrator
View Audit 350226 Questioned Costs: $1
Views of Responding Officials: The Department agrees with the finding and will implement corrective action. CWS recognizes that Licensing case files from neighbor islands (Maui, West Hawaii, and Kauai) came late or not at all, and this lack of ability to review the records significantly contribute...
Views of Responding Officials: The Department agrees with the finding and will implement corrective action. CWS recognizes that Licensing case files from neighbor islands (Maui, West Hawaii, and Kauai) came late or not at all, and this lack of ability to review the records significantly contributed to the errors. Moving forward, CWS will ensure easier records identification by geographical location and begin the neighbor island’s audits first, allowing extra time for records travel to review site. CWS also notes that additional communication and information sharing with auditors would have been helpful to ensure understanding of expectations prior to on site audit. The communications requested would resemble a pre audit information sharing call, an on site audit entry meeting with key agency staff, and an audit exit conference to discuss findings before the final report is generated. Corrective Action Taken or Planned: 1. CWS staff will be informed of the audit findings and corrective action plan, emphasizing the importance of: A. Providing requested records in advance of the audit, B. Diligent compliance with policies and procedures, C. Supervisor coaching, support and review of records/documents for completeness, D. The impact of individual unit records maintenance performance on the outcome of the audit and this corrective action plan. 2. Case specific audit findings and corrective actions taken will be noted in each record where there was a finding. Staff will: A. Continue to ensure staffs are securing the Adoption Assistance and Legal Guardian permanency assistance forms that provide notice for age changes and payment increases. B. Document the qualifying need for Difficulty of Care (“DOC”) determination for the records, showing how DOC was calculated and ensuring filed in eligibility record. C. Locate or reprint and file missing “Certificate of Approvals.” D. Locate missing clearances in records not provided for review or re run them if not located in records reviewed. Please note: Not all clearances are secured prior to placement; FBI clearances come later and are NOT required prior to placement in a “provisionally licensed” home. E. Administrators to work with courts to ensure court orders contain the required language and are secured in a timely fashion. i. Secure missing termination of parental rights order. ii. Secure court order supporting “reasonable efforts.” iii. Secure missing police protective custody documentation or voluntary foster custody agreement for three cases. F. For young person(s) in Imua Kakou (“IK”) who turned 18 while in care. i. CWS will secure a letter for the record, from the school that the young person is attending, which notes when the young person is expected to graduate. ii. Work with IK providers and IK liaison to make sure logs and meeting minutes are in SHAKA. iii. Document (reason for) continuation of monthly subsidy payments after youth turned 18. 3. CWS has identified the Eligibility Unit (“FPPEU”) record as the primary record for audits with the Licensing record and other case files as secondary. 4. Unit staffs (Licensing, CWS and FPPEU) who manage cases identified with errors in this audit will be retrained, ensuring familiarity with grant requirements and related policies and procedures. A. The FPPEU Administrator and supervisors will review the eligibility unit record checklist and ensure use of checklist will lead to a complete record containing all required documentation. B. FPPEU staff will review error records identified in this audit, following checklist and secure missing documentation, update inaccurate information and verify that all necessary documentation is present. i. Staff will be given coaching/supervisory support to correctly complete documentation. ii. Document the qualifying need for Difficulty of Care (“DOC”) determination for the records, showing how DOC was calculated. iii. Case specific audit findings and corrective actions taken will be noted in each record where there was a finding. C. The Licensing Unit Section Administrator and supervisors will review error records identified in this audit, secure missing documentation, update inaccurate information and verify that all necessary documentation is present. i. Staff will be given coaching/supervisory support to correctly complete documentation. ii. Case specific audit findings and corrective actions taken will be noted in each record where there was a finding. 5. The identified errors and the related corrective action steps proposed above will be reviewed by CWS Administrators, staff supervisors, and the Management Information Compliance Unit (“MICU”) within 90 days to ensure missing documentation has been secured and/or properly noted in record. A. MICU staff will audit records to verify that corrective actions have been completed for case specific audit findings. This includes verifying that records contain a note explaining updated information or information gathered due to audit. B. MICU will work with Branch Administrators, Section Administrators, Social Services Assistants (“SSA”) and program personnel to ensure file updates with completion of missing information. C. MICU will verify accuracy of DOC calculations for case specific errors noted in this audit, while supervisors will verify accuracy of DOC calculations on an ongoing basis. 6. As CWS implements this corrective action plan and monitors the results, the action steps proposed in 1 5 may be modified, based on input from CWS Administrators or exploration groups with line staff who complete this documentation. 7. In preparation for future audits, CWS will update the file identification and secure transport process as follows: A. MICU will send a separate email for records request to each neighbor island, identifying only their records, rather than sending a joint, multi-island, records request. B. The records request email sent by MICU will include a submittal deadline that will accommodate extra time for secured travel of records between islands to ensure all records arrive on time. C. MICU and Branch will review records submitted, ensuring that all records are available to the auditors for review. Completion Date: On going Responding Official(s): Kisha C. Raby, Social Services Division Program Development Administrator; Tonia Mahi, Social Services Division Assistant Child Welfare Services Branch Administrator
View Audit 350226 Questioned Costs: $1
Views of Responding Officials: The Department agrees with the finding and will implement corrective action. Child Welfare Services (“CWS”) recognizes that licensing case files from neighbor islands (Maui, West Hawaii, and Kauai) came late or not at all, and this lack of ability to review the recor...
Views of Responding Officials: The Department agrees with the finding and will implement corrective action. Child Welfare Services (“CWS”) recognizes that licensing case files from neighbor islands (Maui, West Hawaii, and Kauai) came late or not at all, and this lack of ability to review the records significantly contributed to the errors. Moving forward, CWS will ensure easier records identification by geographical location and begin the neighbor island’s audits first, allowing extra time for records travel to review site. CWS also notes that additional communication and information sharing with auditors would have been helpful to ensure understanding of expectations prior to on site audit. The communications requested would resemble a pre audit information sharing call, an on site audit entry meeting with key agency staff, and an audit exit conference to discuss findings before the final report is generated. Corrective Action Taken or Planned: 1. CWS staff will be informed of the audit findings and corrective action plan, emphasizing the importance of: A. Providing requested records in advance of the audit, B. Diligent compliance with policies and procedures, C. Supervisor coaching, support and review of records/documents for completeness, D. The impact of individual unit records maintenance performance on the outcome of the audit and this corrective action plan. 2. Case specific audit findings and corrective actions taken will be noted in each record where there was a finding. Staff will: A. Continue to ensure staff are securing the Adoption Assistance and Legal Guardian permanency assistance forms that provide notice for age changes and payment increases. B. Document the qualifying need for Difficulty of Care (“DOC”) determination for the records, showing how DOC was calculated, and ensuring it is filed in eligibility record. C. Locate or reprint and file missing “Certificate of Approvals.” D. Locate missing clearances in records not provided for review or re run them if not located in records reviewed. Please note: Not all clearances are secured prior to placement; FBI clearances come later and are NOT required prior to placement in a “provisionally licensed” home. E. Administrators to work with courts to ensure court orders contain the required language and are secured in a timely fashion. i. Secure missing termination of parental rights order. ii. Secure court order supporting “reasonable efforts.” iii. Secure missing police protective custody documentation or voluntary foster custody agreement for three cases. F. For young person(s) in Imua Kakou (“IK”) who turned 18 while in care. i. CWS will secure a letter for the record, from the school that the young person is attending, which notes when the young person is expected to graduate. ii. Work with IK providers and IK liaison to make sure logs and meeting minutes are in SHAKA. iii. Document (reason for) continuation of monthly subsidy payments after youth turned 18. 3. CWS has identified the Eligibility Unit (“FPPEU”) record as the primary record for audits with the Licensing record and other case files as secondary. 4. Unit staffs (Licensing, CWS, and FPPEU) who manage cases identified with errors in this audit will be retrained, ensuring familiarity with grant requirements and related policies and procedures. A. The FPPEU Administrator and supervisors will review the eligibility unit record checklist and ensure use of checklist will lead to a complete record containing all required documentation. B. FPPEU staff will review error records identified in this audit, following checklist and secure missing documentation, update inaccurate information and verify that all necessary documentation is present. i. Staff will be given coaching/supervisory support to correctly complete documentation. ii. Document the qualifying need for Difficulty of Care (“DOC”) determination for the records, showing how DOC was calculated. iii. Case specific audit findings and corrective actions taken will be noted in each record where there was a finding. C. The Licensing Unit Section Administrator and supervisors will review error records identified in this audit, secure missing documentation, update inaccurate information, and verify that all necessary documentation is present. i. Staff will be given coaching/supervisory support to correctly complete documentation. ii. Case specific audit findings and corrective actions taken will be noted in each record where there was a finding. 5. The identified errors and the related corrective action steps proposed above will be reviewed by CWS Administrators, staff supervisors, and the Management Information Compliance Unit (“MICU”) within 90 days to ensure missing documentation has been secured and/or properly noted in record. A. MICU staff will audit records to verify that corrective actions have been completed for case specific audit findings. This includes verifying that records contain a note explaining updated information or information gathered due to audit. B. MICU will work with Branch Administrators, Section Administrators, Social Services Assistants (“SSA”) and program personnel to ensure file updates with completion of missing information. C. MICU will verify accuracy of DOC calculations for case specific errors noted in this audit, while supervisors will verify accuracy of DOC calculations on an ongoing basis. 6. As CWS implements this corrective action plan and monitors the results, the action steps proposed in 1 5 may be modified, based on input from CWS Administrators or exploration groups with line staff who complete this documentation. 7. In preparation for future audits, CWS will update the file identification and secure transport process as follows: A. MICU will send a separate email for records request to each neighbor island, identifying only their records, rather than sending a joint, multi-island, records request. B. The records request email sent by MICU will include a submittal deadline that will accommodate extra time for secured travel of records between islands to ensure all records arrive on time. C. MICU and Branch will review records submitted, ensuring that all records are available to the auditors for review. Completion Date: On going Responding Official(s): Kisha C. Raby, Social Services Division Program Development Administrator; Tonia Mahi, Social Services Division Assistant Child Welfare Services Branch Administrator
View Audit 350226 Questioned Costs: $1
Views of Responding Officials: The Department agrees with the finding and will implement corrective action. CWS recognizes that Licensing case files from neighbor islands (Maui, West Hawaii, and Kauai) came late or not at all, and this lack of ability to review the records significantly contribute...
Views of Responding Officials: The Department agrees with the finding and will implement corrective action. CWS recognizes that Licensing case files from neighbor islands (Maui, West Hawaii, and Kauai) came late or not at all, and this lack of ability to review the records significantly contributed to the errors. Moving forward, CWS will ensure easier records identification by geographical location and begin the neighbor island’s audits first, allowing extra time for records travel to review site. CWS also notes that additional communication and information sharing with auditors would have been helpful to ensure understanding of expectations prior to on site audit. The communications requested would resemble a pre audit information sharing call, an on site audit entry meeting with key agency staff, and an audit exit conference to discuss findings before the final report is generated. Corrective Action Taken or Planned: 1. CWS staff will be informed of the audit findings and corrective action plan, emphasizing the importance of: A. Providing requested records in advance of the audit, B. Diligent compliance with policies and procedures, C. Supervisor coaching, support and review of records/documents for completeness, D. The impact of individual unit records maintenance performance on the outcome of the audit and this corrective action plan. 2. Case specific audit findings and corrective actions taken will be noted in each record where there was a finding. Staff will: A. Document the qualifying need for Difficulty of Care (“DOC”) determination for the records, showing how DOC was calculated and ensuring filed in eligibility record. B. Locate or reprint and file missing “Certificate of Approvals.” C. Locate missing clearances in records not provided for review or re-run them if not located in records reviewed. Please note: Not all clearances are secured prior to placement; FBI clearances come later and are NOT required prior to placement in a “provisionally licensed” home. D. Administrators to work with courts to ensure court orders contain the required language and are secured in a timely fashion. i. Secure missing termination of parental rights order. ii. Secure court order supporting “reasonable efforts.” iii. Secure missing police protective custody documentation or voluntary foster custody agreement for three cases. E. For young person(s) in Imua Kakou (“IK”) who turned 18 while in care. i. CWS will secure a letter for the record, from the school that the young person is attending, which notes when the young person is expected to graduate. ii. Work with IK providers and IK liaison to make sure logs and meeting minutes are in SHAKA. iii. Document the reason for continuation of monthly subsidy payments after youth turned 18 or discontinue payment. 3. CWS has identified the Eligibility Unit (“FPPEU”) record as the primary record for audits with the Licensing record and other case files as secondary. 4. Unit staffs (Licensing, CWS and FPPEU) who manage cases identified with errors in this audit will be retrained, ensuring familiarity with grant requirements and related policies and procedures. A. The FPPEU Administrator and supervisors will review the eligibility unit record checklist and ensure use of checklist will lead to a complete record containing all required documentation. B. FPPEU staff will review error records identified in this audit, following checklist and secure missing documentation, update inaccurate information and verify that all necessary documentation is present. i. Staff may be given individual training or coaching/supervisory support to correctly complete documentation. ii. Document the qualifying need for Difficulty of Care (“DOC”) determination for the records, showing how DOC was calculated. iii. Case specific audit findings and corrective actions taken will be noted in each record where there was a finding. C. The Licensing Unit Section Administrator and supervisors will review error records identified in this audit, secure missing documentation, update inaccurate information and verify that all necessary documentation is present. i. Staff will be given individual training or coaching/supervisory support to correctly complete documentation. ii. Case specific audit findings and corrective actions taken will be noted in each record where there was a finding. 5. The identified errors and the related corrective action steps proposed above will be reviewed by CWS Administrators, staff supervisors, and the Management Information Compliance Unit (“MICU”) within 90 days to ensure missing documentation has been secured and/or properly noted in record. A. MICU staff will audit records to verify that corrective actions have been completed for case specific audit findings. This includes verifying that records contain a note explaining updated information or information gathered due to audit. B. MICU will work with Branch Administrators, Section Administrators, Social Services Assistants (“SSA”) and program personnel to ensure file updates with completion of missing information. C. MICU will verify accuracy of DOC calculations for case specific errors noted in this audit, while supervisors will verify accuracy of DOC calculations on an ongoing basis. 6. As CWS implements this corrective action plan and monitors the results, the action steps proposed in 1 5 may be modified, based on input from CWS Administrators or exploration groups with line staff who complete this documentation. 7. In preparation for future audits, CWS will update the file identification and secure transport process as follows: A. MICU will send a separate email for records request to each neighbor island, identifying only their records, rather than sending a joint, multi-island, records request. B. The records request email sent by MICU will include a submittal deadline that will accommodate extra time for secured travel of records between islands to ensure all records arrive on time. C. MICU and Branch will review records submitted, ensuring that all records are available to the auditors for review. Completion Date: On going Responding Official(s): Kisha C. Raby, Social Services Division Program Development Administrator; Tonia Mahi, Social Services Division Assistant Child Welfare Services Branch Administrator
View Audit 350226 Questioned Costs: $1
PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION - Enhance procedures to update Federally funded construction contracts to require the submission of weekly certified payrolls to the appropriate District personnel. ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE - Immediate RESPONSIBLE CONTACT PERSON - Brandon Esposito, Director of Finance
PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION - Enhance procedures to update Federally funded construction contracts to require the submission of weekly certified payrolls to the appropriate District personnel. ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE - Immediate RESPONSIBLE CONTACT PERSON - Brandon Esposito, Director of Finance
View Audit 350218 Questioned Costs: $1
A. Comments on Finding and Recommendations Comments: It is important to note that at no time did L. Hayes & Associates, Inc. (LHA), Managing Agent, use project funds for unrelated costs. This finding No. 2024-001 refers specifically to fraudulent check charges that were posted to the Hughes operatin...
A. Comments on Finding and Recommendations Comments: It is important to note that at no time did L. Hayes & Associates, Inc. (LHA), Managing Agent, use project funds for unrelated costs. This finding No. 2024-001 refers specifically to fraudulent check charges that were posted to the Hughes operating account in March 2024 by an unknown person. There was a total of three (3) checks written by the same person. This person is unknown to us and did not have access to our check stock nor our office. Therefore, it appears that the perpetrator used some type of machine to reproduce copies of our checks and the signature of Ms. Voundy-Thomas, Operations Manager. Recommendations: Based on the recommendation of our auditor, our office contacted the Maryland Banking Commission to report and pursue reimbursement of the fraudulent charges deducted from the Hughes Neighborhood Housing operating bank account and they referred us to contact the Office of the Comptroller of Currency. Our auditor also suggested that we discuss potential solutions with our HUD Account Executive. B. Actions Taken or Planned Actions Taken: Upon reconciliation of the Project’s March 2024 bank accounts and the discovery of the fraudulent charges, Ms. Voundy, Thomas immediately contacted Wells Fargo’s Fraud Claims Department to report our findings, request reimbursement of the charges, and to place an alert of the account. In addition, Ms. Voundy-Thomas and Mr. Merrick, Hughes, BOD President, visited a Wells Fargo branch to discuss this matter directly with an Account Representative. Unfortunately, the bank denied our request for reimbursement of the fraudulent charges stating that our claim was not processed within 30-days of the posted charges. Actions Planned: Per the guidance from the Maryland Banking Commission, our office has contacted the Office of the Comptroller of Currency to further pursue reimbursement of the fraudulent charges. Also, upon completion and submission of the above-mentioned audit, we plan to pursue any further actions recommended by our HUD Account Executive regarding this finding. Status of Corrective Action on Prior Findings No prior findings were noted.
View Audit 350209 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding Reference: 2024-007 - SFA Eligibility (ASU) Responsible Official: Juanita Edwards, Director of Financial Aid Corrective Action Planned: ASU disburses aid to students’ accounts once the student has completed registration. The student was enrolled and eligible for the Pell grant. The student h...
Finding Reference: 2024-007 - SFA Eligibility (ASU) Responsible Official: Juanita Edwards, Director of Financial Aid Corrective Action Planned: ASU disburses aid to students’ accounts once the student has completed registration. The student was enrolled and eligible for the Pell grant. The student had not completed registration, so Pell was not disbursed. Moving forward ASU will review all student accounts to ensure students have completed the registration process. If they have not completed registration timely, they will be notified. Once notified and registration is complete, Title IV funds will be disbursed to the students’ accounts. Checks and balances have been reviewed and implemented to ensure the process is completed timely. Estimated Completion Date: June 30, 2025
View Audit 350191 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding Reference: 2024-002 - SFA Special Tests and Provisions - Return of Title IV Funds (ASU) Responsible Official: Debra Reynolds, Assistant Director of Financial Aid Corrective Action Planned: ASU will ensure that post withdrawal aid that could have been disbursed will be disbursed timely unless...
Finding Reference: 2024-002 - SFA Special Tests and Provisions - Return of Title IV Funds (ASU) Responsible Official: Debra Reynolds, Assistant Director of Financial Aid Corrective Action Planned: ASU will ensure that post withdrawal aid that could have been disbursed will be disbursed timely unless the student requests otherwise. Estimated Completion Date: June 30, 2025 Finding Reference: 2024-002 - SFA Special Tests and Provisions - Return of Title IV Funds (JSU) Responsible Official: Mr. Letherio Zeigler, Executive Director of Student Financial Aid Services and Scholarships Corrective Action Planned: Jackson State University has examined the error and has implemented targeted training on the Return of Title IV (R2T4) process. This training focuses on accurately determining break days and performing the required calculations to ensure precision and compliance. To reinforce these efforts, the university will continue to provide quarterly training and cross-training opportunities for staff, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of R2T4 policies and procedures. To further strengthen accuracy, an additional internal review process has been established within the financial aid office. This review will be conducted by the Executive Director of Financial Aid, who will oversee calculations until the responsibility is designated to another team member with demonstrated expertise in R2T4 processing. These corrective measures will enhance the accuracy of R2T4 calculations, ensure compliance with federal regulations, and improve overall financial aid operations at Jackson State University. Estimated Completion Date: May 2, 2025 Finding Reference: 2024-002 - SFA Special Tests and Provisions - Return of Title IV Funds (MSU) Responsible Official: Lori Ball Executive Director for Financial Aid and Scholarship Corrective Action Planned: Our interpretation of the regulation was that if classes were held on weekends before or after the 5-day break, the weekend days were not counted, only the week itself (Monday- Friday) and the weekend afterwards. Classes started back the next Monday so we used 7 days. If we do not have classes on Saturday before spring break, we are now counting 9 days. Estimated Completion Date: March 15, 2025 Finding Reference: 2024-002 - SFA Special Tests and Provisions - Return of Title IV Funds (MVSU) Responsible Official: Angela Fant, Director of Financial Aid Corrective Action Planned: The internal control procedures have been updated to incorporate a nine-day break. The refund of funds to the Department of Education will be processed upon completion of the necessary calculations. Estimated Completion Date: September 30, 2025 Finding Reference: 2024-002 - SFA Special Tests and Provisions - Return of Title IV Funds (UM) Responsible Official: Mr. Eduardo Prieto, Vice Chancellor for Enrollment Management Corrective Action Planned: The University of Mississippi’s Office of Financial Aid has an existing process for next-level supervisor review of all Return of Title IV (R2T4) calculations. To further strengthen compliance, future R2T4 reviews will also include any documentation used to determine the date of withdrawal. While it is believed that communication with instructors was accurate, messaging will be refined to clarify which activities cannot be used to document academic engagement (e.g., simply logging into the online system). Additional scrutiny will be applied when determining the last date of attendance for online courses, and instructors will be contacted for clarification as needed. The Office of Financial Aid has also established a unit to enhance compliance through internal reviews of various processes, including R2T4. Although not all R2T4 calculations will be selected for examination, sample evaluations will provide an additional level of oversight. Additionally, a transition to Ellucian’s Banner system is planned for the 2026-2027 academic year, requiring instructors to report the last date of attendance for all F grades at the time of grade entry. This change will help minimize ambiguity regarding unofficial withdrawals. Estimated Completion Date: April 1, 2025 Finding Reference: 2024-002 - SFA Special Tests and Provisions - Return of Title IV Funds (UMMC) Responsible Official: Coralisa Williams, Senior Financial Aid Advisor Corrective Action Planned: Processing procedure has been updated to state the use of the “last date in class” from the academic calendar published in the UMMC Bulletin to ensure consistent and correct processing of R2T4. Estimated Completion Date: Effective immediately (has reviewed current R2T4 for accuracy) Finding Reference: 2024-002 - SFA Special Tests and Provisions - Return of Title IV Funds (USM) Responsible Official: David Williamson, Director of Financial Aid Corrective Action Planned: The university included the Friday commencement day as last day of the term. Our reasoning is that some students are still completing assignments, tests, and class projects through the day of commencement. The financial aid office will verify the number of class days with the registrar office before each semester to ensure all class days are included in the award period. The student with the possible post-withdrawal disbursement withdrew prior to our census and all institutional charges were reversed and we could not verify that the student actually attended any of their classes. Effective February 3, 2025, institutions are exempt from performing an R2T4 calculation in this situation. Amend § 668.22(a)(2)(ii)(A)(6) to exempt institutions from performing an R2T4 calculation if: (1) a student is treated as never having begun attendance; (2) the institution returns all title IV, HEA assistance disbursed to the student for that payment period or period of enrollment; (3) the institution refunds all institutional charges to the student for that payment period or period of enrollment; and (4) the institution writes off or cancels any payment period or period of enrollment balance owed by the student to the institution due to the institution's returning of title IV, HEA funds to the Department. Going forward, USM intends to not perform R2T4 calculations for students that meet one of the above exemptions. Other possible post withdrawal disbursement will be tracked, and communication will be sent to students eligible once they are identified and calculated upon withdrawal. Estimated Completion Date: March 17, 2025
View Audit 350191 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding Reference: 2024-010 - Eligibility (Board Office) Responsible Official: Dr. Casey Prestwood, Associate Commissioner for Academic and Student Affairs Corrective Action Planned: An evaluation form was developed and implemented to be used with each applicant review as a checklist of requirements...
Finding Reference: 2024-010 - Eligibility (Board Office) Responsible Official: Dr. Casey Prestwood, Associate Commissioner for Academic and Student Affairs Corrective Action Planned: An evaluation form was developed and implemented to be used with each applicant review as a checklist of requirements. In addition, there is a second layer of review of all approved applicants’ eligibility prior to requesting disbursement of funds. An outside CPA firm was contracted in May 2024 to perform the second layer of review of each approved applicant before disbursement, to review all disbursement prior to that date in the current grant cycle, and to provide guidance on internal controls. An additional staff person to assist with grant awarding and programmatic operations was hired in August 2024. Estimated Completion Date: August 2024
View Audit 350191 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 539638 (2024-003)
Significant Deficiency 2024
Nbcc
CA
vii. Management Response and Corrective Action Plan: The travel in question involved staff travel to the annual National Alliance to End Homelessness (NAEH) conference. As evidenced by correspondence with HUD AAQ, it has long been established that attending an NAEH conference is an eligible use of ...
vii. Management Response and Corrective Action Plan: The travel in question involved staff travel to the annual National Alliance to End Homelessness (NAEH) conference. As evidenced by correspondence with HUD AAQ, it has long been established that attending an NAEH conference is an eligible use of CoC and ESG grant funds. We perceived the historical general approval to be in alignment with the contract requirement of obtaining written approval for the reimbursement of costs incurred for travel outside the county. All costs submitted for reimbursement were eligible and reasonable expenses. We now understand this historical approval by HUD was not transferrable to this grant and therefore, moving forward, we will secure email approval of travel eligibility for specific grant reimbursement prior to travel. To that end, we have already been in contact with Housing and Community Development (HCD) fiscal staff at Santa Barbara County about a reliable method to secure said approvals in advance moving forward. If travel is not approved for a specific grant, or not obtained prior to travel, other unrestricted income will be utilized for that portion of the travel expenses. viii. Contact Person (s) Responsible for Corrective Action: Kristine Schwarz, Executive Director, kschwarz@sbnbcc.org Victoria Garfield, Grants Administrator, vgarfield@sbnbcc.org ix. Anticipated Completion Date: Staff anticipate attending the annual NAEH conference this year, therefore we will request approval once registration is confirmed and expect to receive approval or rejection from County CD staff by no later than the date of travel, or approximately July 15, 2025.
View Audit 350179 Questioned Costs: $1
Horatio School District will contact the Federal Communications Commission for guidance regarding this matter and reimbursement. Anticipated completion date: April 15, 2025.
Horatio School District will contact the Federal Communications Commission for guidance regarding this matter and reimbursement. Anticipated completion date: April 15, 2025.
View Audit 350148 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding Number: 2024-002 Planned Corrective Action: The District had an unusually high volume of federal grants related to the CARES Act. There were expenditures planned for these funds; however, due to supply issues with both vendors and materials, other projects had to be substituted for the p...
Finding Number: 2024-002 Planned Corrective Action: The District had an unusually high volume of federal grants related to the CARES Act. There were expenditures planned for these funds; however, due to supply issues with both vendors and materials, other projects had to be substituted for the planned expenditures to meet timing requirements of the grant. It was during this process that the requirements related to the Davis Bacon Act were not followed. Moving forward, staff has gained experience and are more aware of the effects of moving expenditures for grant-related funds. Anticipated Completion Date: 3/31/2025 Responsible Contact Person: Jacqueline Webb
View Audit 350140 Questioned Costs: $1
FINDING 2024-004: US Department of Education and PA Department of Education - COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) - ALN #84.425 - Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements found in Part 3 Section N, "Special Tests and Pro...
FINDING 2024-004: US Department of Education and PA Department of Education - COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) - ALN #84.425 - Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements found in Part 3 Section N, "Special Tests and Provisions" of the Compliance Supplement, all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than the prevailing wages rates established by the Department of Labor (DOL). Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and DOL regulations. This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance. Condition: The School District did not have adequate internal control procedures in place to ensure that all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds were paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor. As a result, the School District did not properly notify 1 of the 3 contractors tested of the requirements to comply with the wage rate requirements via the including of a prevailing wage rate clause in the contract between the contractor and the School District, and therefore, the use prevailing wage rates were not determined. Cause: The School District did not have formal procedures in place to ensure that prevailing wage rate requirements were met on all construction projects over $2,000. Effect: The School District was not in compliance with the Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: No Questioned Costs: Unknown Recommendation: We recommend that the School District revise its purchasing policy to formally reflect the requirements of Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements. Additionally, we recommend that the School District establish procedures to ensure that prevailing wage rate requirements are met for federally funded construction projects over $2,000. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The School District agrees with the recommendation. The Business Office will require that projects over $2,000 involving federal must use prevailing wage rates.
View Audit 350127 Questioned Costs: $1
FINDING 2024-003: US Department of Education and PA Department of Education - COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) - ALN #84.425 - Equipment and Real Property Management Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements found in Part 3 Section F, "Equipment/Real Property Management" ...
FINDING 2024-003: US Department of Education and PA Department of Education - COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) - ALN #84.425 - Equipment and Real Property Management Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements found in Part 3 Section F, "Equipment/Real Property Management" of the Compliance Supplement, the School District is required to receive prior approval from the Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) for capital expenditures for equipment acquisition or improvements to land, buildings, and equipment. Condition: The School District did not adequately obtain approval from PDE prior to purchasing equipment and building improvements with ESF funds. Cause: The School District did not have a formal procedure in place to obtain prior approval of applicable expenditures. Effect: The School District was not in compliance with the Equipment and Real Property Management requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: Yes Questioned Costs: Unknown Recommendation: We recommend that the School District revise its purchasing policy to formally reflect the requirements of Equipment/Real Property Management. We recommend that the School District establish procedures to ensure that Equipment/Real Property Management requirements are met for applicable purchases. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The School District has expended all ESSER II grant monies, but the School District still has ARP ESSER funds that need to be spent, and some of the upcoming purchases will include capital expenditures. In order to receive prior approval from PDE for those expenditures, the School District will submit a revised ARP ESSER budget request to PDE. Approval of the budget requested by PDE includes the required prior approval for capital expenditures.
View Audit 350127 Questioned Costs: $1
2024-002. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles: Allowable Program Costs United States Department of Education, Passed Through New York State, Department of Education: Special Education Cluster Special Education Grants to States: IDEA Part B ALN: 84.027 Special Education Grants to States: IDEA 611 ARP All...
2024-002. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles: Allowable Program Costs United States Department of Education, Passed Through New York State, Department of Education: Special Education Cluster Special Education Grants to States: IDEA Part B ALN: 84.027 Special Education Grants to States: IDEA 611 ARP Allocations ALN: 84.027X Special Education Preschool Grants: IDEA Preschool ALN: 84.173 Special Education Preschool Grants: IDEA 619 ARP Allocations ALN: 84.173X Condition: Testing of the expenditures charged to the special education cluster, determined that a certain cost charged to the program grant would not be allowable. Planned Corrective Action: The District will monitor procedures that perform a detailed review of expenditures being charged to grants to ensure that they are allowable costs under the guidance provided by federal agencies. Responsible Contact Person: Laurie O’Hara Director of Special Education Connetquot Central School District 700 Ocean Avenue Bohemia, New York 11716 Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2025.
View Audit 350117 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 2024-004 - HUD Comprehensive Review, Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program – CFDA No. 14.871; Grant period – year ended June 30, 2024 Corrective Action: The Authority submitted corrective actions to HUD dated August 17, 2023, which included implementing HUD’s recommended corrective action...
Finding 2024-004 - HUD Comprehensive Review, Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program – CFDA No. 14.871; Grant period – year ended June 30, 2024 Corrective Action: The Authority submitted corrective actions to HUD dated August 17, 2023, which included implementing HUD’s recommended corrective actions. Responsible Party: Matthew McClammey, Executive Director, (334)745-4171. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2025.
View Audit 350086 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding Number: 2024-001 Condition: GBQ identified errors in how employee time was allocated to the program, and salaries and wages allocated to the program in excess of the Executive Level II Salary maximum. Specifically, one employee had salaries and wages allocated to the program in excess of ho...
Finding Number: 2024-001 Condition: GBQ identified errors in how employee time was allocated to the program, and salaries and wages allocated to the program in excess of the Executive Level II Salary maximum. Specifically, one employee had salaries and wages allocated to the program in excess of hours tracked to the program for a selected month. Another employee had an inappropriate wage rate applied to allocated time to the program. Last, two employees had compensation levels allocated to the program in excess of the Executive Level II Salary max amount in effect for the respective period. Planned Corrective Action: ECDI will put additional steps in place in Payroll Review process to ensure reconciliation of payroll charges to actual time records and rates. The organization will modify it's calculations to ensure that pay rates are reflective of the timeframe in question (not for periods before or after). ECDI will update its calculations to include thresholds for Executive pay so they are not entered in excess of approved rates. The company is also exploring technology enhancements so that information from ECDl's Payroll system flows directly into ECDl's Accounting system to limit the chance of errors during extraction from Payroll system and uploading into Accounting system. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Brian Barrett and Hudu Ahmed. Completion Date: In process
View Audit 350075 Questioned Costs: $1
2024-004 Eligibility U.S. Department of Labor Assistance Listing Number 17.258/17.259/17.278 Recommendation: We recommend that the Board implement policies and procedures to ensure that the necessary controls are in place to properly verify the eligibility of all Youth Activities participants. Act...
2024-004 Eligibility U.S. Department of Labor Assistance Listing Number 17.258/17.259/17.278 Recommendation: We recommend that the Board implement policies and procedures to ensure that the necessary controls are in place to properly verify the eligibility of all Youth Activities participants. Action Taken: The Board has established policies and procedures to strengthen eligibility verification for the Youth program participants. These policies outline clear documentation requirements, verification steps, and staff responsibilities. Staff involved in eligibility determination have been trained on the new procedures to ensure consistency and compliance with federal and state guidelines and will receive ongoing training and technical assistance. The Board has implemented internal controls, including multi-level verification and supervisory review to ensure the accuracy and completeness of participant eligibility determinations.
View Audit 350052 Questioned Costs: $1
2024-003 Subrecipient Monitoring U.S. Department of Labor Assistance Listing Number 17.258/17.259/17.278 Recommendation: We recommend that the Board implement its recently adopted policies and procedures and commit the appropriate personnel to subrecipient monitoring to ensure that the Board is in ...
2024-003 Subrecipient Monitoring U.S. Department of Labor Assistance Listing Number 17.258/17.259/17.278 Recommendation: We recommend that the Board implement its recently adopted policies and procedures and commit the appropriate personnel to subrecipient monitoring to ensure that the Board is in compliance with all federal requirements. Action Taken: The Board has formally integrated the new adopted policies and procedures into our operational framework to ensure consistency and adherence to federal guidelines. Specific staff members have been designated to subrecipient monitoring responsibilities, ensuring adequate oversight and compliance. Executive staff will conduct period internal reviews to assess the effectiveness of our monitoring processes and make improvements as needed.
View Audit 350052 Questioned Costs: $1
2024-002 Reporting U.S. Department of Labor Assistance Listing Number 17.258/17.259/17.278 Recommendation: We recommend that the Board design and implement controls to ensure that all required reporting is submitted accurately and in a timely fashion. Action Taken: Region III will establish cle...
2024-002 Reporting U.S. Department of Labor Assistance Listing Number 17.258/17.259/17.278 Recommendation: We recommend that the Board design and implement controls to ensure that all required reporting is submitted accurately and in a timely fashion. Action Taken: Region III will establish clear documentation checklist with requirements for each report to ensure completeness and accuracy. Assign specific roles and responsibilities for report preparation, review and approval before submission to ensure that multiple levels of review are in place.
View Audit 350052 Questioned Costs: $1
2024-001 Activities Allowed or Unallowed U.S. Department of Labor Assistance Listing Number 17.258/17.259/17.278 Recommendation: We recommend that the Board design and implement controls to ensure that all charges to federal programs are adequately reviewed and approved prior to payment. Action T...
2024-001 Activities Allowed or Unallowed U.S. Department of Labor Assistance Listing Number 17.258/17.259/17.278 Recommendation: We recommend that the Board design and implement controls to ensure that all charges to federal programs are adequately reviewed and approved prior to payment. Action Taken: Region III will create a detailed workflow of the approval process that includes the following: Initial request, review by finance department, and approval by designated individuals. Ensure that no single individual has control over all aspects of the charge approval process. We will schedule quarterly internal audits to review samples of transactions for compliance.
View Audit 350052 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 539474 (2024-007)
Significant Deficiency 2024
Eligibility – Assistance Listing No. 84.063, 84.268 Recommendation: We recommend the College design controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to ensure compliance with reporting requirements. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit fin...
Eligibility – Assistance Listing No. 84.063, 84.268 Recommendation: We recommend the College design controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to ensure compliance with reporting requirements. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Financial Aid office will be implementing an SOP which will document a review process of work done by the third-party processor, to include COD reporting, and Verification procedures. We will also be implementing a process to review students who need to complete their exit counseling. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Levi Powell, Student Financial Aid Director Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 6/30/2025
View Audit 350009 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 539472 (2024-006)
Significant Deficiency 2024
Special Tests and Provisions Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act– Assistance Listing No. 84.063, 84.268 Recommendation: We recommend the College design controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to ensure compliance with reporting requirements. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: Ther...
Special Tests and Provisions Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act– Assistance Listing No. 84.063, 84.268 Recommendation: We recommend the College design controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to ensure compliance with reporting requirements. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The IT department continues to improve its processes; an annual review of the WISP has been started and will continue. The Financial Aid Office will work with IT to make sure that the WISP is improved to include and provide secure disposal of customer information and make sure the review is documented. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Levi Powell, Student Financial Aid Director Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 6/30/2025
View Audit 350009 Questioned Costs: $1
Special Tests and Provisions R2T4 – Assistance Listing No. 84.063, 84.268 Recommendation: We recommend the College design controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to ensure compliance with reporting requirements. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreeme...
Special Tests and Provisions R2T4 – Assistance Listing No. 84.063, 84.268 Recommendation: We recommend the College design controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to ensure compliance with reporting requirements. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Financial Aid office will be crafting a new SOP to address R2T4 audit findings. The team will work more closely with the Registrar and Academic Deans when determining the withdrawal status of a student and make sure that the R2T4 documentation is accurately completed, a review of completed R2T4s will also be conducted. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Levi Powell, Student Financial Aid Director Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 6/30/2025
View Audit 350009 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 539464 (2024-001)
Significant Deficiency 2024
Management's Response/Planned Corrective Action: The Organization has established and implemented a new procedure to ensure the correct allocation of substitute teachers. This change has already been made effective as of July 1, 2024 to meet the auditor's recommendations. The Organization will now b...
Management's Response/Planned Corrective Action: The Organization has established and implemented a new procedure to ensure the correct allocation of substitute teachers. This change has already been made effective as of July 1, 2024 to meet the auditor's recommendations. The Organization will now bill substitutes exclusively to the appropriate site and program, which will enhance financial tracking and accountability. Substitutes will no longer be included in any distribution tables. Currently, substitutes are assigned to a System of Support (SOS) as their direct supervisor. The SOS is responsible for scheduling substitutes, entering their schedules into Paycor, and assigning them to school sites. Additionally, the Payroll Coordinator, Joanna Qualls, is required to add a billing code to these substitutes. The Payroll Department follows a procedure every pay period to run a report on substitutes, ensuring they are coded correctly. This process has been established as a step for every payroll run. The Director of Finance, Juana Sierra-Perez, also does a final audit of payroll to ensure transactions are being coded properly.
View Audit 350003 Questioned Costs: $1
« 1 51 52 54 55 285 »