Criteria
Part 2, CFR Part 200.430 notes “Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed”. The document continues to state that documentation must “Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity.”
Additionally, Part 200.431 states “The cost of fringe benefits in the form of regular compensation paid to employees during periods of authorized absences from the job, such as for annual leave, family-related leave, sick leave, holidays, court leave, military leave, administrative leave, and other similar benefits, are allowable is all of the following criteria are met:”. The criteria include that “the costs are equitably allocated to all related activities, including Federal awards.”
Condition
While performing tests of NBCC’s internal controls over payroll transactions, we noted the Organization had incorrectly allocated time for 8 of the 50 selections. Additionally, we noted that the Organization had allocated time for leave based on pre-determined budgets, rather than actual hours worked in the pay period, for 27 of the 50 selections.
Cause
NBCC has not implemented proper internal control policies to adhere to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance.
Repeat Finding
No.
Effect
Noncompliance may impact future funding from Federal awards.
Recommendation
We recommend NBCC implement proper internal control procedures to document hours worked, by employee and by grant; and maintain the documentation to support charges allocated to each Federal award.
Criteria
Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations, Section 200.303 states “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal Statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (b) Comply with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. (c) Evaluate and monitor the non-Federal entity’s compliance with statues, regulations and the terms and conditions of Federal awards. (d) Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings. (e) Take reasonable measures to safeguard protected personally identifiable information and other information the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity designates as sensitive or the non-Federal entity considers sensitive consistent with applicable Federal, state, local, and tribal laws regarding privacy and obligations of confidentiality.”
Additionally, the Subrecipient Agreement, with the County of Santa Barbara, notes NBCC “shall obtain written approval from COUNTY for the use of any funds provided under this Agreement for the reimbursement of any costs incurred for travel outside the County of Santa Barbara.”
Condition
Two of the 25 expenditures selected for testing, associated with the above award, were related to travel outside of the County of Santa Barbara. We subsequently reviewed the detail of expenditures charged to this award, noting multiple other transactions. Additionally, we noted the client did not have prior approval to allocate funds to this award.
Cause
NBCC’s internal controls are not properly designed and enforced to be in line with Federal guidelines, or take into account specific requirements of Federal awards.
Repeat Finding
No.
Effect
NBCC’s lack of internal controls may allow improper expenditures to be charged to Federal awards. This may impact future funding from Federal awards.
Recommendation
We recommend NBCC establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal Awards in order to provide reasonable assurance that NBCC is managing the Awards in compliance with Federal statues and regulations, as well as the terms and conditions set forth in the specific Federal Award or subrecipient agreement.
Criteria
Part 2, CFR 200, 200.318 states “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.”
Condition
While performing tests of NBCC’s internal controls over compliance, while the Organization did have a procurement policy, the policy was not being followed. This included not obtaining and documenting competitive bids or quotes, as well as not verifying whether vendors are suspended or debarred entities.
Cause
NBCC’s internal controls are not properly designed and enforced to be in line with Federal guidelines.
Repeat Finding
No.
Effect
Noncompliance may impact future funding from Federal awards. Additionally, lack of compliance may lead to contracting with ineligible vendors.
Recommendation
We recommend NBCC implement proper internal control procedures including implementing and following a procurement policy in line with the Uniform Guidance.
Criteria
Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations, Section 200.303 states “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal Statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (b) Comply with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. (c) Evaluate and monitor the non-Federal entity’s compliance with statues, regulations and the terms and conditions of Federal awards. (d) Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings. (e) Take reasonable measures to safeguard protected personally identifiable information and other information the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity designates as sensitive or the non-Federal entity considers sensitive consistent with applicable Federal, state, local, and tribal laws regarding privacy and obligations of confidentiality.”
Condition
During the course of our eligibility testing, we noted one of the 45 selections where the individual was not part of the program during the fiscal year-under audit. The individual had been incorrectly included in the population, and in various reports for this program.
Cause
NBCC’s internal controls are not properly designed and enforced to be in line with Federal guidelines, or take into account specific requirements of Federal awards.
Repeat Finding
No.
Effect
NBCC’s lack of internal controls may allow for individuals to receive benefits who are not eligibility to participate in Federally funded programs. Additionally, these discrepancies may lead to incorrect Federal reporting. This may impact future funding from Federal awards.
Recommendation
We recommend NBCC establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal Awards in order to provide reasonable assurance that NBCC is managing the Awards in compliance with Federal statues and regulations, as well as the terms and conditions set forth in the specific Federal Award or subrecipient agreement.
Criteria
Part 2, CFR Part 200.430 notes “Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed”. The document continues to state that documentation must “Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity.”
Additionally, Part 200.431 states “The cost of fringe benefits in the form of regular compensation paid to employees during periods of authorized absences from the job, such as for annual leave, family-related leave, sick leave, holidays, court leave, military leave, administrative leave, and other similar benefits, are allowable is all of the following criteria are met:”. The criteria include that “the costs are equitably allocated to all related activities, including Federal awards.”
Condition
While performing tests of NBCC’s internal controls over payroll transactions, we noted the Organization had incorrectly allocated time for 8 of the 50 selections. Additionally, we noted that the Organization had allocated time for leave based on pre-determined budgets, rather than actual hours worked in the pay period, for 27 of the 50 selections.
Cause
NBCC has not implemented proper internal control policies to adhere to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance.
Repeat Finding
No.
Effect
Noncompliance may impact future funding from Federal awards.
Recommendation
We recommend NBCC implement proper internal control procedures to document hours worked, by employee and by grant; and maintain the documentation to support charges allocated to each Federal award.
Criteria
Part 2, CFR 200, 200.318 states “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.”
Condition
While performing tests of NBCC’s internal controls over compliance, while the Organization did have a procurement policy, the policy was not being followed. This included not obtaining and documenting competitive bids or quotes, as well as not verifying whether vendors are suspended or debarred entities.
Cause
NBCC’s internal controls are not properly designed and enforced to be in line with Federal guidelines.
Repeat Finding
No.
Effect
Noncompliance may impact future funding from Federal awards. Additionally, lack of compliance may lead to contracting with ineligible vendors.
Recommendation
We recommend NBCC implement proper internal control procedures including implementing and following a procurement policy in line with the Uniform Guidance.
Criteria
Part 2, CFR Part 200.430 notes “Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed”. The document continues to state that documentation must “Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity.”
Additionally, Part 200.431 states “The cost of fringe benefits in the form of regular compensation paid to employees during periods of authorized absences from the job, such as for annual leave, family-related leave, sick leave, holidays, court leave, military leave, administrative leave, and other similar benefits, are allowable is all of the following criteria are met:”. The criteria include that “the costs are equitably allocated to all related activities, including Federal awards.”
Condition
While performing tests of NBCC’s internal controls over payroll transactions, we noted the Organization had incorrectly allocated time for 8 of the 50 selections. Additionally, we noted that the Organization had allocated time for leave based on pre-determined budgets, rather than actual hours worked in the pay period, for 27 of the 50 selections.
Cause
NBCC has not implemented proper internal control policies to adhere to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance.
Repeat Finding
No.
Effect
Noncompliance may impact future funding from Federal awards.
Recommendation
We recommend NBCC implement proper internal control procedures to document hours worked, by employee and by grant; and maintain the documentation to support charges allocated to each Federal award.
Criteria
Part 2, CFR 200, 200.318 states “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.”
Condition
While performing tests of NBCC’s internal controls over compliance, while the Organization did have a procurement policy, the policy was not being followed. This included not obtaining and documenting competitive bids or quotes, as well as not verifying whether vendors are suspended or debarred entities.
Cause
NBCC’s internal controls are not properly designed and enforced to be in line with Federal guidelines.
Repeat Finding
No.
Effect
Noncompliance may impact future funding from Federal awards. Additionally, lack of compliance may lead to contracting with ineligible vendors.
Recommendation
We recommend NBCC implement proper internal control procedures including implementing and following a procurement policy in line with the Uniform Guidance.
Criteria
Part 2, CFR Part 200.430 notes “Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed”. The document continues to state that documentation must “Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity.”
Additionally, Part 200.431 states “The cost of fringe benefits in the form of regular compensation paid to employees during periods of authorized absences from the job, such as for annual leave, family-related leave, sick leave, holidays, court leave, military leave, administrative leave, and other similar benefits, are allowable is all of the following criteria are met:”. The criteria include that “the costs are equitably allocated to all related activities, including Federal awards.”
Condition
While performing tests of NBCC’s internal controls over payroll transactions, we noted the Organization had incorrectly allocated time for 8 of the 50 selections. Additionally, we noted that the Organization had allocated time for leave based on pre-determined budgets, rather than actual hours worked in the pay period, for 27 of the 50 selections.
Cause
NBCC has not implemented proper internal control policies to adhere to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance.
Repeat Finding
No.
Effect
Noncompliance may impact future funding from Federal awards.
Recommendation
We recommend NBCC implement proper internal control procedures to document hours worked, by employee and by grant; and maintain the documentation to support charges allocated to each Federal award.
Criteria
Part 2, CFR 200, 200.318 states “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.”
Condition
While performing tests of NBCC’s internal controls over compliance, while the Organization did have a procurement policy, the policy was not being followed. This included not obtaining and documenting competitive bids or quotes, as well as not verifying whether vendors are suspended or debarred entities.
Cause
NBCC’s internal controls are not properly designed and enforced to be in line with Federal guidelines.
Repeat Finding
No.
Effect
Noncompliance may impact future funding from Federal awards. Additionally, lack of compliance may lead to contracting with ineligible vendors.
Recommendation
We recommend NBCC implement proper internal control procedures including implementing and following a procurement policy in line with the Uniform Guidance.
Criteria
Part 2, CFR Part 200.430 notes “Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed”. The document continues to state that documentation must “Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity.”
Additionally, Part 200.431 states “The cost of fringe benefits in the form of regular compensation paid to employees during periods of authorized absences from the job, such as for annual leave, family-related leave, sick leave, holidays, court leave, military leave, administrative leave, and other similar benefits, are allowable is all of the following criteria are met:”. The criteria include that “the costs are equitably allocated to all related activities, including Federal awards.”
Condition
While performing tests of NBCC’s internal controls over payroll transactions, we noted the Organization had incorrectly allocated time for 8 of the 50 selections. Additionally, we noted that the Organization had allocated time for leave based on pre-determined budgets, rather than actual hours worked in the pay period, for 27 of the 50 selections.
Cause
NBCC has not implemented proper internal control policies to adhere to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance.
Repeat Finding
No.
Effect
Noncompliance may impact future funding from Federal awards.
Recommendation
We recommend NBCC implement proper internal control procedures to document hours worked, by employee and by grant; and maintain the documentation to support charges allocated to each Federal award.
Criteria
Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations, Section 200.303 states “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal Statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (b) Comply with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. (c) Evaluate and monitor the non-Federal entity’s compliance with statues, regulations and the terms and conditions of Federal awards. (d) Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings. (e) Take reasonable measures to safeguard protected personally identifiable information and other information the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity designates as sensitive or the non-Federal entity considers sensitive consistent with applicable Federal, state, local, and tribal laws regarding privacy and obligations of confidentiality.”
Additionally, the Subrecipient Agreement, with the County of Santa Barbara, notes NBCC “shall obtain written approval from COUNTY for the use of any funds provided under this Agreement for the reimbursement of any costs incurred for travel outside the County of Santa Barbara.”
Condition
Two of the 25 expenditures selected for testing, associated with the above award, were related to travel outside of the County of Santa Barbara. We subsequently reviewed the detail of expenditures charged to this award, noting multiple other transactions. Additionally, we noted the client did not have prior approval to allocate funds to this award.
Cause
NBCC’s internal controls are not properly designed and enforced to be in line with Federal guidelines, or take into account specific requirements of Federal awards.
Repeat Finding
No.
Effect
NBCC’s lack of internal controls may allow improper expenditures to be charged to Federal awards. This may impact future funding from Federal awards.
Recommendation
We recommend NBCC establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal Awards in order to provide reasonable assurance that NBCC is managing the Awards in compliance with Federal statues and regulations, as well as the terms and conditions set forth in the specific Federal Award or subrecipient agreement.
Criteria
Part 2, CFR 200, 200.318 states “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.”
Condition
While performing tests of NBCC’s internal controls over compliance, while the Organization did have a procurement policy, the policy was not being followed. This included not obtaining and documenting competitive bids or quotes, as well as not verifying whether vendors are suspended or debarred entities.
Cause
NBCC’s internal controls are not properly designed and enforced to be in line with Federal guidelines.
Repeat Finding
No.
Effect
Noncompliance may impact future funding from Federal awards. Additionally, lack of compliance may lead to contracting with ineligible vendors.
Recommendation
We recommend NBCC implement proper internal control procedures including implementing and following a procurement policy in line with the Uniform Guidance.
Criteria
Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations, Section 200.303 states “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal Statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (b) Comply with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. (c) Evaluate and monitor the non-Federal entity’s compliance with statues, regulations and the terms and conditions of Federal awards. (d) Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings. (e) Take reasonable measures to safeguard protected personally identifiable information and other information the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity designates as sensitive or the non-Federal entity considers sensitive consistent with applicable Federal, state, local, and tribal laws regarding privacy and obligations of confidentiality.”
Condition
During the course of our eligibility testing, we noted one of the 45 selections where the individual was not part of the program during the fiscal year-under audit. The individual had been incorrectly included in the population, and in various reports for this program.
Cause
NBCC’s internal controls are not properly designed and enforced to be in line with Federal guidelines, or take into account specific requirements of Federal awards.
Repeat Finding
No.
Effect
NBCC’s lack of internal controls may allow for individuals to receive benefits who are not eligibility to participate in Federally funded programs. Additionally, these discrepancies may lead to incorrect Federal reporting. This may impact future funding from Federal awards.
Recommendation
We recommend NBCC establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal Awards in order to provide reasonable assurance that NBCC is managing the Awards in compliance with Federal statues and regulations, as well as the terms and conditions set forth in the specific Federal Award or subrecipient agreement.
Criteria
Part 2, CFR Part 200.430 notes “Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed”. The document continues to state that documentation must “Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity.”
Additionally, Part 200.431 states “The cost of fringe benefits in the form of regular compensation paid to employees during periods of authorized absences from the job, such as for annual leave, family-related leave, sick leave, holidays, court leave, military leave, administrative leave, and other similar benefits, are allowable is all of the following criteria are met:”. The criteria include that “the costs are equitably allocated to all related activities, including Federal awards.”
Condition
While performing tests of NBCC’s internal controls over payroll transactions, we noted the Organization had incorrectly allocated time for 8 of the 50 selections. Additionally, we noted that the Organization had allocated time for leave based on pre-determined budgets, rather than actual hours worked in the pay period, for 27 of the 50 selections.
Cause
NBCC has not implemented proper internal control policies to adhere to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance.
Repeat Finding
No.
Effect
Noncompliance may impact future funding from Federal awards.
Recommendation
We recommend NBCC implement proper internal control procedures to document hours worked, by employee and by grant; and maintain the documentation to support charges allocated to each Federal award.
Criteria
Part 2, CFR 200, 200.318 states “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.”
Condition
While performing tests of NBCC’s internal controls over compliance, while the Organization did have a procurement policy, the policy was not being followed. This included not obtaining and documenting competitive bids or quotes, as well as not verifying whether vendors are suspended or debarred entities.
Cause
NBCC’s internal controls are not properly designed and enforced to be in line with Federal guidelines.
Repeat Finding
No.
Effect
Noncompliance may impact future funding from Federal awards. Additionally, lack of compliance may lead to contracting with ineligible vendors.
Recommendation
We recommend NBCC implement proper internal control procedures including implementing and following a procurement policy in line with the Uniform Guidance.
Criteria
Part 2, CFR Part 200.430 notes “Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed”. The document continues to state that documentation must “Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity.”
Additionally, Part 200.431 states “The cost of fringe benefits in the form of regular compensation paid to employees during periods of authorized absences from the job, such as for annual leave, family-related leave, sick leave, holidays, court leave, military leave, administrative leave, and other similar benefits, are allowable is all of the following criteria are met:”. The criteria include that “the costs are equitably allocated to all related activities, including Federal awards.”
Condition
While performing tests of NBCC’s internal controls over payroll transactions, we noted the Organization had incorrectly allocated time for 8 of the 50 selections. Additionally, we noted that the Organization had allocated time for leave based on pre-determined budgets, rather than actual hours worked in the pay period, for 27 of the 50 selections.
Cause
NBCC has not implemented proper internal control policies to adhere to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance.
Repeat Finding
No.
Effect
Noncompliance may impact future funding from Federal awards.
Recommendation
We recommend NBCC implement proper internal control procedures to document hours worked, by employee and by grant; and maintain the documentation to support charges allocated to each Federal award.
Criteria
Part 2, CFR 200, 200.318 states “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.”
Condition
While performing tests of NBCC’s internal controls over compliance, while the Organization did have a procurement policy, the policy was not being followed. This included not obtaining and documenting competitive bids or quotes, as well as not verifying whether vendors are suspended or debarred entities.
Cause
NBCC’s internal controls are not properly designed and enforced to be in line with Federal guidelines.
Repeat Finding
No.
Effect
Noncompliance may impact future funding from Federal awards. Additionally, lack of compliance may lead to contracting with ineligible vendors.
Recommendation
We recommend NBCC implement proper internal control procedures including implementing and following a procurement policy in line with the Uniform Guidance.
Criteria
Part 2, CFR Part 200.430 notes “Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed”. The document continues to state that documentation must “Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity.”
Additionally, Part 200.431 states “The cost of fringe benefits in the form of regular compensation paid to employees during periods of authorized absences from the job, such as for annual leave, family-related leave, sick leave, holidays, court leave, military leave, administrative leave, and other similar benefits, are allowable is all of the following criteria are met:”. The criteria include that “the costs are equitably allocated to all related activities, including Federal awards.”
Condition
While performing tests of NBCC’s internal controls over payroll transactions, we noted the Organization had incorrectly allocated time for 8 of the 50 selections. Additionally, we noted that the Organization had allocated time for leave based on pre-determined budgets, rather than actual hours worked in the pay period, for 27 of the 50 selections.
Cause
NBCC has not implemented proper internal control policies to adhere to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance.
Repeat Finding
No.
Effect
Noncompliance may impact future funding from Federal awards.
Recommendation
We recommend NBCC implement proper internal control procedures to document hours worked, by employee and by grant; and maintain the documentation to support charges allocated to each Federal award.
Criteria
Part 2, CFR 200, 200.318 states “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.”
Condition
While performing tests of NBCC’s internal controls over compliance, while the Organization did have a procurement policy, the policy was not being followed. This included not obtaining and documenting competitive bids or quotes, as well as not verifying whether vendors are suspended or debarred entities.
Cause
NBCC’s internal controls are not properly designed and enforced to be in line with Federal guidelines.
Repeat Finding
No.
Effect
Noncompliance may impact future funding from Federal awards. Additionally, lack of compliance may lead to contracting with ineligible vendors.
Recommendation
We recommend NBCC implement proper internal control procedures including implementing and following a procurement policy in line with the Uniform Guidance.