Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
61,799
In database
Filtered Results
23,815
Matching current filters
Showing Page
441 of 953
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: Questioned Costs
Finding No. 2023-005 -Allowable Costs/Cost Principles; Significant Deficiency (#14.896 - Family Self Sufficiency Program) Auditee's Response and Planned Corrective Action The Milton Housing Authority will review FSS program guidelines and reimbursable activities to ensure that it is properly disburs...
Finding No. 2023-005 -Allowable Costs/Cost Principles; Significant Deficiency (#14.896 - Family Self Sufficiency Program) Auditee's Response and Planned Corrective Action The Milton Housing Authority will review FSS program guidelines and reimbursable activities to ensure that it is properly disbursing FSS Funds. To that end, MHA is working closely with HUD officials. Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Earl Fay, Executive Director (617) 698-2169
Finding No. 2023-004 - Reporting; Significant Deficiency (All Federal Programs) Auditee's Response and Planned Corrective Action The late filing of the 12-31-22 REAC occurred under prior Authority management. We expect the 12-31- 23 REAC to be filed on time. Person Responsible for Corrective Action:...
Finding No. 2023-004 - Reporting; Significant Deficiency (All Federal Programs) Auditee's Response and Planned Corrective Action The late filing of the 12-31-22 REAC occurred under prior Authority management. We expect the 12-31- 23 REAC to be filed on time. Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Earl Fay, Executive Director (617) 698-2169
Finding No. 2023-003 - Special Tests and Provisions: The Milton Housing Authority has contracted a consultant to update the Administrative Plan. The Administrative Plan updates will include section 4.0 and will present the entire plan to the Board of Commissioners for their approval. Planned Impleme...
Finding No. 2023-003 - Special Tests and Provisions: The Milton Housing Authority has contracted a consultant to update the Administrative Plan. The Administrative Plan updates will include section 4.0 and will present the entire plan to the Board of Commissioners for their approval. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: October 1, 2024 Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Earl Fay, Executive Director (617) 698-2169
Finding No. 2023-002 - Reporting; Significant Deficiency (HCV Cluster #14.871 and #14.879) Auditee's Response and Planned Corrective Action The Milton Housing Authority will develop better internal controls over the performance and documentation of SEMAP. To that end, a consultant has been contracte...
Finding No. 2023-002 - Reporting; Significant Deficiency (HCV Cluster #14.871 and #14.879) Auditee's Response and Planned Corrective Action The Milton Housing Authority will develop better internal controls over the performance and documentation of SEMAP. To that end, a consultant has been contracted and continues to train Employees. Staff is working with local HUD representatives for additional support. MHA will also consider outsourcing this to a reputable third party. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: September 27, 2024 Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Earl Fay, Executive Director (617) 698-2169
The Fulton County District Attorney’s Office (FCDAO) was made aware during the recent Department of Justice audit in July 2024 of the need to strengthen compliance in this process. Effective August 2024, processes were revised to comply with the 2 CFR 200 compliance requirement for documentation. Th...
The Fulton County District Attorney’s Office (FCDAO) was made aware during the recent Department of Justice audit in July 2024 of the need to strengthen compliance in this process. Effective August 2024, processes were revised to comply with the 2 CFR 200 compliance requirement for documentation. The revised processes have been documented and are now included in the FCDAO standard operating procedure for time and effort management.
View Audit 323109 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 500333 (2023-002)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Management’s Corrective Action Plan For the Year Ended December 31, 2023 Contact Person(s): Sophia Hernandez, Chief Operations Officer Sophia.Hernandez@youthcare.org Amber Aman, Deputy Operations Office - Finance Amber.Aman@youthcare.org Finding Number: 2023 - 002 Explanation and specific reasons f...
Management’s Corrective Action Plan For the Year Ended December 31, 2023 Contact Person(s): Sophia Hernandez, Chief Operations Officer Sophia.Hernandez@youthcare.org Amber Aman, Deputy Operations Office - Finance Amber.Aman@youthcare.org Finding Number: 2023 - 002 Explanation and specific reasons for disagreement with the audit finding or that corrective action is not required (if applicable): No disagreement. Corrective action taken: • Develop a contract expenditure compliance review process created with final review and approval by Deputy Operations Officers. To be established by September 30th, 2024, and implemented in 2025 annual operating plan Anticipated completion date: In Process
View Audit 323098 Questioned Costs: $1
The System returned the remainder of funds required. Firelands Regional Medical Center School of Nursing has implemented the following control to prevent this error in the future. The Financial Coordinator will submit a copy of the Return of Title IV funds report to the business office when retur...
The System returned the remainder of funds required. Firelands Regional Medical Center School of Nursing has implemented the following control to prevent this error in the future. The Financial Coordinator will submit a copy of the Return of Title IV funds report to the business office when returning funds. The business office will use this report to make sure the appropriate amount is posted to the student's account.
View Audit 323097 Questioned Costs: $1
Person responsible for corrective action plan: Anthony Madera, CFO Lummi Indian Business Council 2665 Kwina Road Bellingham, WA 98226 (360) 384-7181 Condition: 2 out of 40 samples were missing proof of insurance in the patient’s file, which is a requirement under the Department's eligibility polic...
Person responsible for corrective action plan: Anthony Madera, CFO Lummi Indian Business Council 2665 Kwina Road Bellingham, WA 98226 (360) 384-7181 Condition: 2 out of 40 samples were missing proof of insurance in the patient’s file, which is a requirement under the Department's eligibility policy. Solution: Implement a standardized process for verifying, documenting, and maintaining proof of required documents (e.g. proof of residency, insurance, etc.) in the patient's file during each visit. This will involve revising and implementing the new procedures manual to verify and document patient intake. The procedures manual will support appropriate communication from data collection to when information is uploaded into EPIC to verify if clients have insurance. Our training plan will incorporate these new methods of collecting data from the clients and outline regular internal auditing of patient files to assist the Tribal Assisters to properly verify documents and communicate with providers to assist clients in enrolling with insurance providers such as but not limited to Washington Apple Health (WAH). Corrective action plan will be in accordance with c CFR, Part 200, Subpart F, §200.511 Audit findings follow-up. Responsible: Kathryn Halverson, Health and Human Services CEO, Lummi Indian Business Council Anticipated completion date: 06/30/2025
Person responsible for corrective action plan: Anthony Madera, CFO Lummi Indian Business Council 2665 Kwina Road Bellingham, WA 98226 (360) 384-7181 Condition: During transactional testing, 11 of 16 individually important items (IIIs) were journal entries with no documented review and approval pro...
Person responsible for corrective action plan: Anthony Madera, CFO Lummi Indian Business Council 2665 Kwina Road Bellingham, WA 98226 (360) 384-7181 Condition: During transactional testing, 11 of 16 individually important items (IIIs) were journal entries with no documented review and approval process. Solution: With the guidance and authority outlined in the Department’s internal policies and in accordance with 2 CFR, Part 200, Subpart E, §200.405 Allocable costs, manual adjustments will be defined as reasonable and allocable as defined within existing governing statues, regulations, or terms and conditions of the award. Levels of delegation of staff administering these regulatory activities will utilize the appropriate credentials request cost adjustments and use prudent judgment to determine those costs are necessary and do not deviate from the Department’s established practices and policies. Final review of cost adjustment requests will be reviewed by Department’s OMB and once approved a signature of review and approval will be documented. Corrective action plan will be in accordance with c CFR, Part 200, Subpart F, §200.511 Audit findings follow-up. The Department entered into a professional agreement with Financial Service Advisors, LLC to assess current policies to update standards of management by identifying credentials and experience of senior finance staff who will oversee these activities. Revisions to the policies will provide the Department’s government an extensive manual that will be developed into a fiscal management training. Training will include but not be limited to reviewing procurement methods, fiscal review of ledger activity, and audit responsibility on a quarterly basis and reporting to tribal council. Responsible: Anthony Madera, Chief Financial Officer, Lummi Indian Business Council Anticipated completion date: 06/30/2025
Management has reviewed the loan requirements and will ensure that excess cash will not be pulled from the Project except as allowed under the Section 232 guidelines and at annual or semi‐annual intervals. Additional training was provided to the cash director as of November 2023 and will ensure that...
Management has reviewed the loan requirements and will ensure that excess cash will not be pulled from the Project except as allowed under the Section 232 guidelines and at annual or semi‐annual intervals. Additional training was provided to the cash director as of November 2023 and will ensure that excess cash will not be pulled from the Project.
Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization’s procurement policy is followed and that procurement procedures are documented, reviewed and approved. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: We will...
Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization’s procurement policy is followed and that procurement procedures are documented, reviewed and approved. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: We will review our current policies and procedures in these areas to determine if any changes should be implemented. We will ensure staff responsible for procurement of goods and services are familiar with applicable federal and state laws and policies for awarding and executing contracts. We are deeply committed to the continuous improvement of our purchasing policies and procedures to uphold the highest standards of transparency and accountability. In this regard, procurement policy will be updated to comply with the Uniform Guidance for federal awards. Furthermore, to strengthen our oversight of sole-source contracts awarded with program and non-program funds, we will introduce stringent measures requiring thorough documentation of the vendor’s or contractor’s qualifications. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Department Head, Jan Warren/Amber Henderson (Compliance), Haydee Hill (CFO), Sharon Brown (CEO). Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 12/31/2024
Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implements policies and procedures to properly calculate and allocate payroll benefits. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: We will develop and imp...
Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implements policies and procedures to properly calculate and allocate payroll benefits. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: We will develop and implement an allocation plan for payroll benefits. We will develop process and procedures where charging of payroll benefits expenses to federal grants includes the written recommendation from compliance team and written approval of the CFO/CEO prior to payroll benefits being charged to federal grants. We will consult with the grantor to discuss whether the questioned costs identified in the audit should be repaid. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Jan Warren/Amber Henderson (Compliance), Haydee Hill (CFO), Sharon Brown (CEO) Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 12/31/2024
View Audit 323092 Questioned Costs: $1
Recommendation: We recommend management implement procedures to ensure that unallowable costs are not charged to federal grants. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: We will provide supplementary tra...
Recommendation: We recommend management implement procedures to ensure that unallowable costs are not charged to federal grants. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: We will provide supplementary training focused on the accurate allocation of costs to federal awards, as well as the identification and separation of unallowable costs from allowable costs. We will develop and implement detailed processes and procedures to ensure effective oversight and control of disbursements. These processes will require initial approval from the department head for all disbursements. Subsequently, the compliance team will conduct a secondary review and approval. Finally, all disbursements will necessitate final approval from the CFO/CEO before being processed for payment. This multi-step approval process is designed to ensure proper allocation of costs to federal grants. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Department Head, Jan Warren/Amber Henderson (Compliance), Haydee Hill (CFO), Sharon Brown (CEO). Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2024
All new client’s eligibility documents are reviewed by the Lead Case Manager to ensure that every required document for eligibility is in place. These clients were given a 30-day eligibility initially, allowing them time to collect required documents for complete eligibility. This was done for years...
All new client’s eligibility documents are reviewed by the Lead Case Manager to ensure that every required document for eligibility is in place. These clients were given a 30-day eligibility initially, allowing them time to collect required documents for complete eligibility. This was done for years, allowing clients to be seen by a medical provider quickly. This practice ended in 2023. 30-day eligibility is no longer allowed.
Finding 2023-004: Reporting The auditors noted the following areas for improvement: ● The SDA could not provide evidence of an internal review and approval on submitted performance metric report. ● The SDA was unable to provide proof of submission for one NT-106 performance metric report and three N...
Finding 2023-004: Reporting The auditors noted the following areas for improvement: ● The SDA could not provide evidence of an internal review and approval on submitted performance metric report. ● The SDA was unable to provide proof of submission for one NT-106 performance metric report and three NT-110 performance metric reports. ● The SDA submitted 2 reports late, one for NT-108 and one for NT-110. The auditors recommend the following: 1. Management implements procedures to ensure all required reports are prepared, reviewed, and submitted on time, with supporting documentation maintained in compliance with grant agreements. SDA Response ● Cook County has acknowledged receipt of all of the SDA performance grant reporting in a timely manner, however was unable to produce the specific submission information due to a change in the County system to GovGrants to the level requested by the SDA auditor. ● The delay in submission for the NT-108 report was due to the Cook County system change to GovGrants. The delay in submission to NT-110 is acknowledged, with the note that the due date for NT-110 metrics was shortened compared to the prior year. SDA Corrective Actions Management has fully transitioned to GovGrants for all metric and financial reporting, which will permit self-access to the data for all submitted reports in 2024. For NT-110, the SDA continues to document submission via email in addition to keeping track of all reports in Sharepoint. These actions aim to resolve this finding in all future audits. The full implementation of our checklist tool and quarterly review will further enhance our compliance.
Finding 2023-002: Internal Controls over Allowable Costs The auditors noted the following areas for improvement: ● Time & Effort Certifications (T&E) were missing from 18 out of 40 tested contractor invoices. ● All payroll for W-2 employees was billed to grants based on a percentage of time spent ve...
Finding 2023-002: Internal Controls over Allowable Costs The auditors noted the following areas for improvement: ● Time & Effort Certifications (T&E) were missing from 18 out of 40 tested contractor invoices. ● All payroll for W-2 employees was billed to grants based on a percentage of time spent versus actual time spent. ● From a list of 244 clients, 21 client intake forms (used to determine eligibility for services) for Business Growth Services clients were unable to be produced. The auditors recommend the following: 1. Management to implement procedures to ensure all expenditures, including personnel costs, are properly reviewed, approved, and supported with documentation in accordance with federal regulations. SDA Response The SDA accepts the above findings and would like to add the following information for context: ● The requirement to collect T&E forms wasn’t initially established until the completion of the 2022 audit and after the departure of some personnel. Management attempted to collect T&E forms from prior contractors, but was not successful in securing the specific forms identified by the auditors. ● The SDA created a payroll classification document during 2023 which outlined T&E for all W-2 employees at a set rate for the year. This document, however, was not accepted by the auditors as evidence of actual hours expended on each grant, resulting in this finding. ● The SDA onboarded a new Director of Business Growth Services (BGS) in 2023, which led to changes in both the operational structure and the nature of the data collected for BGS activities. During this period, a data migration took place to a newer version of Salesforce that was built specifically for the SDA. Unfortunately, some data was either lost or unmapped during the migration process, leading to discrepancies in the completeness of historical records. SDA Corrective Actions Management is committed to continue training for personnel to ensure timely completion and compliance of hiring as well as time and effort documentation going forward. The SDA is implementing a new checklist tool to bolster compliance. This checklist will help the Director of Finance and Administration identify and correct any missing compliance well in advance of the next audit. In addition, Management is implementing a new quarterly review process to assess both compliance and financial accounts. The new quarterly review process will ensure documentation is maintained and accounted for each transaction, particularly for restricted grants, to minimize any post-close adjustments. The combination of both the new checklist tool and review process will support continued timeliness and eliminate this finding in future audits.
View Audit 323067 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 500284 (2023-007)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Defense Federal Program Name: Conservation and Rehabilitation of Natural Resources on Military Installations Assistance Listing Number: 12.005 Federal Award Identification Number and Year:...
Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Defense Federal Program Name: Conservation and Rehabilitation of Natural Resources on Military Installations Assistance Listing Number: 12.005 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79TI083313 - 2020 Award Period: September 28, 2020, through September 27, 2025 Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that a non-federal entity must "Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)." Condition: During testing, 2 of the 60 samples selected had an individual approving their own timecard. Questioned costs: None. Context: A sample of 60 was made from a population of over 250 paychecks processed during the year with costs charged to the major program. Out of the 60 timecards that were sampled, there were two instances where the individual whose timecard was being reviewed also approved their own timecard. Cause: At the time of these payroll runs, the Organization did not have procedures in place to identify an appropriate approver for the Executive Director's timecards. Effect: Without appropriate segregation of duties around the approval of timecards, there is an increased risk of errors and fraud in the timekeeping and payroll process, which could result in inaccurate financial reporting and misappropriation of funds. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: CLA recommends that another individual with knowledge of the Executive Director's time and effort on the various programs approve his timecards. The Organization has already identified a member of the executive team to perform such functions and will implement the change going forward. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The organization has implemented a policy such that no employee can approve their own timecard. As noted above, the organization has identified an appropriate executive team member to approve the Executive Director’s timecard. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Gary Slater Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 10/1/2024 If you have any questions regarding this plan, please call Gary Slater at 305-213-8829.
Finding 500282 (2023-005)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Compliance and Internal Control over Compliance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Defense Federal Program Name: Conservation and Rehabilitation of Natural Resources on Military Installations Assistance Listing Number: 12.005 Federal Award Identification N...
Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Compliance and Internal Control over Compliance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Defense Federal Program Name: Conservation and Rehabilitation of Natural Resources on Military Installations Assistance Listing Number: 12.005 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79TI083313 - 2020 Award Period: September 28, 2020, through September 27, 2025 Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.302(a) on Financial management states that "... the other non-Federal entity's financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award". Condition: During testing, 2 of the 5 samples selected did not include sufficient documentation to agree all amounts requested for reimbursement for the month in question to the expenditures listed in the general ledger detail by program. Questioned costs: Unknown. Context: A sample of 5 monthly reimbursement requests were taken from a population of 13. Of the 5 sampled, two were insufficiently supported to agree the amounts requested for reimbursement for the month in question to the expenditures listed in the general ledger detail by program. Cause: The Organization was using a cumulative profit and loss to file monthly reimbursement requests (beginning of the year through the reimbursement month). In addition, profit and loss reports were not consistently saved at the time the reports were prepared for reimbursement for January and February 2023. Effect: The Organization is currently in noncompliance with federal regulations with regard to adequate documentation. Without adequate documentation in place to ensure costs are evidenced and reconcile to the expenditures documented in the underlying accounting information that is used to prepare the SEFA, the Organization could incorrectly charge expenditures to the federal program, or not request appropriate reimbursement that the Organization is entitled to under the terms of the grant. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-005. Recommendation: Starting in March 2023, the Organization has already implemented a new process for the preparation of monthly reimbursement requests, including documentation retention. Point-in-time reports (i.e., profit and losses) are saved at the time of report preparation. This has enhanced clarity of costs attributable to each monthly period and reduces the chance that costs will be missed when requesting for reimbursement. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Previous corrective actions were completed in April 2024 upon receipt of our FY 2022 Audit from CLA. As noted above, we believe these corrective actions would have captured most, if not all, of the findings if they were in place for the entire FY23 period. That said we continue to review and strengthen our internal controls and training for admin staff for preparing reimbursement requests. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Gary Slater Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 10/1/2024
Finding 500280 (2023-003)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Defense Federal Program Name: Conservation and Rehabilitation of Natural Resources on Military Installations Assistance Listing Number: 12.005 Federal Award Identification Number and Year:...
Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Defense Federal Program Name: Conservation and Rehabilitation of Natural Resources on Military Installations Assistance Listing Number: 12.005 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79TI083313 - 2020 Award Period: September 28, 2020, through September 27, 2025 Criteria or specific requirement: The Organization, as part of their stated controls, require that expenditures must be approved by the ED, CFO, or program directors / managers. In addition, § 200.303(a) requires the Organization to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: During our testing, it was noted that 12 of 60 samples did not include sufficient records to substantiate approval of the disbursement. Questioned costs: None. Context: A sample of 60 was made from a population of over 250 disbursements charged to the major program. Of the 60 sampled costs, 12 did not have sufficient records to substantiate adequate approval. Cause: Approvals are not maintained for ACH transactions. Effect: Without adequate controls in place to ensure costs are reasonable and intended for the program charged, the Organization could incorrectly charge expenditures to the federal program, report fraudulent expenditures, or not request appropriate reimbursement that the Organization is entitled to under the terms of the grant. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-003. Recommendation: CLA recommends that additional emphasis of documentary evidence of approvals be made, and such evidence should be obtained and retained by the Organization as proof of oversight of expenditure of federal funds. CLA would also recommend the use of an AP voucher, or similar, for each type of disbursement that leaves the Organization (check, ACH, EFT, credit card, etc.) to improve documentary evidence that costs are being reviewed and approved for appropriateness. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Previous corrective actions were completed in April 2024 upon receipt of our FY 2022 Audit from CLA. We believe these corrective actions would have captured most, if not all, of the findings if they were in place for the entire FY23 period. That said we have further reviewed and expanded our internal controls and training for all staff on documenting evidence of approvals, including obtaining and retaining necessary documentation and proof of expenditure oversight for federal funds to ensure there is adequate evidence that costs are being reviewed and approved for appropriateness. As noted above, we have added a procurement approval form and a standardized process for approval signature, quotes, sole source evidence and price analyses. We are also investigating an AP voucher process through our existing accounting software. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Gary Slater Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 10/1/2024
Corrective Action: ABHS plans to optimize technology to improve the month-end closing process and allow for reconciliations to be performed on a consistent basis. Person Responsible: Alethea Velasquez, Chief Financial Officer, and CLA Estimated Completion Date: December 31, 2024
Corrective Action: ABHS plans to optimize technology to improve the month-end closing process and allow for reconciliations to be performed on a consistent basis. Person Responsible: Alethea Velasquez, Chief Financial Officer, and CLA Estimated Completion Date: December 31, 2024
View Audit 323061 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 2023-001: The Corporation did not obtain a HUD approved management certification (HUD Form 9839-B) for the new management agent effective beginning September 1, 2023. Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation: The management certification should be submitted to HUD for retroactive app...
Finding 2023-001: The Corporation did not obtain a HUD approved management certification (HUD Form 9839-B) for the new management agent effective beginning September 1, 2023. Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation: The management certification should be submitted to HUD for retroactive approval for the period beginning September 1, 2023. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding: The Corporation concurs with the recommendation and will submit the management certification to HUD for approval retroactively.
View Audit 323052 Questioned Costs: $1
Management agrees with the finding and is in process of developing and implementing the appropriate policies and procedures.
Management agrees with the finding and is in process of developing and implementing the appropriate policies and procedures.
LSNYC will ensure that the proper accounting period is selected for all subsidiary ledger entries, as well as all journal entries, before posting is approved into the general ledger. We will also train relevant staff on the importance of recording transactions in the correct period in order to minim...
LSNYC will ensure that the proper accounting period is selected for all subsidiary ledger entries, as well as all journal entries, before posting is approved into the general ledger. We will also train relevant staff on the importance of recording transactions in the correct period in order to minimize the likelihood of mistakes.
View Audit 323047 Questioned Costs: $1
This expense was reallocated to LSC in accordance with LSNYC's Cost Allocation Plan, which was developed to comply with LSC regulations on cost allocations and situations where funders will not cover certain costs. In this situation, the initial funder did not allow capital expenses, which is why th...
This expense was reallocated to LSC in accordance with LSNYC's Cost Allocation Plan, which was developed to comply with LSC regulations on cost allocations and situations where funders will not cover certain costs. In this situation, the initial funder did not allow capital expenses, which is why the expense was then allocated to LSC. In the future, we will get advance approval for expenses that we know will get allocated to LSC before they are purchased.
View Audit 323047 Questioned Costs: $1
The attorney responsible for this error has been instructed on the LSC rules for eligible income overrides and specific corrections in this case, including that the financial eligibility override reason of "client seeking to maintain government benefits for low-income is only applicable if those ben...
The attorney responsible for this error has been instructed on the LSC rules for eligible income overrides and specific corrections in this case, including that the financial eligibility override reason of "client seeking to maintain government benefits for low-income is only applicable if those benefits are the subject of our legal representation in a case, and families" that a client must be marked "no" for "Income Eligible (LSC guidelines)" even if they are financially eligible for our representation under a non-LSC funding contract. She was also instructed to review the LSC Financial Eligibility Training video. Ongoing compliance trainings and financial eligibility trainings have been modified to emphasize how to use the income override categories, and that a be marked as "no" for "Income Eligible (LSC guidelines)" and "LSC Eligible" even if the case must client's income makes them eligible to be served under non-LSC funding contracts.
« 1 439 440 442 443 953 »