Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
61,795
In database
Filtered Results
23,815
Matching current filters
Showing Page
349 of 953
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: Questioned Costs
Corrective Action Report Summary FINDING 2024‐001 Criteria: For each fiscal year, the amount of expenditures for special education and related services provided to federally connected children with disabilities must be at least equal to the amount of funds received or credited under Section 7003(d) ...
Corrective Action Report Summary FINDING 2024‐001 Criteria: For each fiscal year, the amount of expenditures for special education and related services provided to federally connected children with disabilities must be at least equal to the amount of funds received or credited under Section 7003(d) of the ESEA for that fiscal year. This is demonstrated by comparing the amount of Section 7003(d) funds received or credited with the result of the following calculation: a. Divide total LEA expenditures for special education and related services for all children with disabilities by the average daily attendance (ADA) of all children with disabilities served during the year. b. Multiply the amount determined in paragraph a, above by the ADA of the federally connected children with disabilities claimed by the LEA for the year. If the amount of Section 7003(d) funds received or credited is greater than the amount calculated above, an overpayment equal to the excess Section 7003(d) funds exits. This overpayment may be reduced or eliminated to the extent that the LEA can demonstrate that the average per pupil expenditure for special education and related services provided to federally connected children with disabilities exceeded its average per pupil expenditure for serving non-federally connected children with disabilities (Section 7003(d) of ESEA (20 USC 7703(d)); 34 CFR section 222.53(d)). Audit Recommendation: We recommend management of the District review processes related to required level of expenditures for Impact Aid and establish appropriate internal controls to ensure all requirements are met. Auditee Response: The entire current year allocation was expended, however not all the accumulated unearned was spent. In FY 25 management budgeted to expend the entire balance of unearned as well as the actual currently year amounts received. We further will be using a calculation to check if we are in excess, per Section 7003(d), which would require a repayment. Corrective Action Plan: Managements plan is to fully expend Impact Aide funds each fiscal year, prior to using other funding sources for Special Education. Person Responsible: Kim Barnhurst, Chief Financial Officer Timeline: Managements plan is to be in full compliance by end of FY 25.
Planned Corrective Action Finding: The Organization did not have adequate and effective controls over compliance in place as it relates to applying the sliding fee discount. We found two (2) instances where an individual was not appropriately charged based on the sliding fee policy in place. Crite...
Planned Corrective Action Finding: The Organization did not have adequate and effective controls over compliance in place as it relates to applying the sliding fee discount. We found two (2) instances where an individual was not appropriately charged based on the sliding fee policy in place. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that controls are implemented to ensure the Organization is in compliance with special tests and provisions. This includes charging the appropriate sliding fee discount based on the Organization's policy. Corrective Response: Before the audit testing, management discovered there were situations where the sliding fee wasn’t being correctly applied. Discounts were being calculated by staff because the system calculations were wrong. The Sliding Fee Scale system rebuild has undergone successful testing and is now in the process of being implemented. Management has suggested adjustments to the sliding fee scale to guarantee accurate calculation of patient balances. The board has already approved those changes, and the updated Sliding Fee Scale involves removing the percentage-based charges and setting fixed payments for nominal and minimum fees per visit. The system rebuild for the Sliding Fee Scale has already been tested and is being rolled out. Alternatively, management has proposed changes to the sliding fee scale to ensure that the system will be able to properly calculate the amount due from patients by taking away the percentage due and making the nominal and minimum charges a flat amount per visit. These policy changes will make the application of the sliding fee scale easier to manage for the system, staff, and patients. Anticipated Completion Date 12/31/2024 Responsible Contact Person CFO/Revenue Cycle Director
Recommendation: We recommend the Office of Financial Aid utilize their financial aid processing software to implement disbursement notifications which include all information required by (34 CFR Section 668.165(a)(2) to be sent electronically to students once disbursements are posted. Explanation of...
Recommendation: We recommend the Office of Financial Aid utilize their financial aid processing software to implement disbursement notifications which include all information required by (34 CFR Section 668.165(a)(2) to be sent electronically to students once disbursements are posted. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Corrective Action Planned: The Office of Financial Aid and Scholarships drafted a letter using best practices laid out by NAFSAA which includes all information required by 34 CFR Section 668.165. The System Specialist, who is responsible for disbursing aid, has created documentation that has been added to the disbursement process. Once a disbursement is complete, the System Specialist will run the process in PowerFAIDS that will send the Loan Disbursement Notification via email to students who have received loans. This includes students who have received Federal Direct Subsidized, Unsubsidized, Parent PLUS, Grad PLUS, and private loans. This process is updated and is now in place. Name of Contact Responsible for Corrective Action: David J. Sarah, Director of Financial Aid, 765.641.4110 Anticipated Completion Date: August 2024
Recommendation: We recommend an individual in financial aid with the appropriate level of experience periodically review R2T4 calculations and returns to help ensure that internal controls over such a process can operate effectively and achieve compliance. We also recommend the University implement ...
Recommendation: We recommend an individual in financial aid with the appropriate level of experience periodically review R2T4 calculations and returns to help ensure that internal controls over such a process can operate effectively and achieve compliance. We also recommend the University implement controls to track and remind when returns need to be returned once the withdrawal determination has been made. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Corrective Action Planned: ● Moving forward, for each year, when the academic calendar is released prior to the beginning of the fall semester, The Office of Financial Aid and Scholarships will immediately determine the dates and number of days used for the R2T4 calculations. ● The Senior Financial Aid Counselor within the Office of Financial Aid and Scholarships, who is responsible for preparing the R2T4 calculations, has enrolled for R2T4 training from NASFAA, which takes place starting on September 3, 2024. The Senior Financial Aid Counselor will also complete a PowerFAIDS training on the R2T4 process within the system. ● The Systems Specialist within the Office of Financial Aid and Scholarships will also be trained on the R2T4 process to provide quality control for the senior financial aid counselor and to ensure we are cross-trained within the Office of Financial Aid. With two individuals working to keep each other accountable, we will be able to avoid similar issues in the future. The Systems Specialist will also complete the NASFAA and PowerFAIDS training. ● All R2T4s will be tracked on a shared file starting in the Fall 2024. The Senior Financial Aid Counselor, Systems Specialist, and Director of Financial Aid will have access to the file for review and quality control. ● The Systems Specialist and Director of Financial Aid will be added to the student withdrawal form workflow through Etrieve. This team of three will all receive a notification when a student withdrawal needs to be processed. ● The Director of Financial Aid will check at least weekly on the shared R2T4 file and will monitor the dates and timelines to ensure calculations are completed within the timeframe allowed. Name of Contact Responsible for Corrective Action: David J. Sarah, Director of Financial Aid, 765.641.4110 Anticipated Completion Date: September 2024
View Audit 330010 Questioned Costs: $1
1. The School will establish a grant management calendar to track all grant-related deadlines, including submission dates for final expenditure report. 2. The School’s management will conduct quarterly review of the grant expenditures and budget alignments for the major government grants.
1. The School will establish a grant management calendar to track all grant-related deadlines, including submission dates for final expenditure report. 2. The School’s management will conduct quarterly review of the grant expenditures and budget alignments for the major government grants.
Finding: 2024-004 Satisfactory Academic Progress Responsible Party: Douglas Cleary, Director of Financial Aid Anticipated Completion Date: July 31, 2024 The audit noted one student was awarded financial aid despite not meeting Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) standards. The issue stemmed from a ...
Finding: 2024-004 Satisfactory Academic Progress Responsible Party: Douglas Cleary, Director of Financial Aid Anticipated Completion Date: July 31, 2024 The audit noted one student was awarded financial aid despite not meeting Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) standards. The issue stemmed from a lapse in the SAP review process at the end of the Fall 2023 term, which was primarily attributed to staff turnover and insufficient training for remaining personnel. When the student did not enroll for the Spring term but later registered for the Summer 2024 session, there were no safeguards in place to prevent the system from awarding financial aid. This oversight highlighted a gap in the current process, emphasizing the need for a more robust mechanism to flag students who are not in compliance with SAP prior to awarding financial aid. In the new organizational structure, the Financial Aid Business Analyst is responsible for executing the SAP process. This individual has approximately 10 years of experience working with SAP processes. During the 2023-2024 academic year the University worked diligently to respond to a Federal Program Review from the U.S. Department of Education, (ED). As a result of the corrective actions being undertaken by the University new procedures in many areas were being drafted and implemented. A new Director of Financial Aid, with over 30 years of experience in financial aid, was hired to improve the overall student service and compliance with the Federal Title IV program. The new director commenced his duties on February 1, 2024. Since that time the University has reorganized the financial aid office by creating an Assistant Director and Financial Aid Business Analyst position who have increased the expertise and overall years of financial aid experience. A leadership team including the Director of Financial Aid, Registrar, Director of Student Accounts, Associate Provost, Provost and Vice President for Finance and Administration was created in January 2024 and meet bi-weekly to discuss Title IV compliance topics, process improvement and customer service. Most of the Financial Aid team’s time in the spring and summer was spent working on the new FAFSA. The team has redirected their efforts in training, standardizing, documenting and improving processes to ensure Title IV compliance and better serve students.
View Audit 329972 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding: 2024-003 Verification Responsible Party: Douglas Cleary, Director of Financial Aid Anticipated Completion Date: October 17, 2024 The auditors identified two issues related to verification of financial aid data supplied on the FAFSA by students. Both findings were from the fall of 2023 and i...
Finding: 2024-003 Verification Responsible Party: Douglas Cleary, Director of Financial Aid Anticipated Completion Date: October 17, 2024 The auditors identified two issues related to verification of financial aid data supplied on the FAFSA by students. Both findings were from the fall of 2023 and in both cases a secondary review was completed and still was not accurately completed. The Office of Financial Aid developed and implemented a comprehensive Business Process Guide (BPG) on October 17, 2024. The guide is aimed at ensuring that all required fields within the verification process are meticulously reviewed and corrected as needed. This guide serves as a crucial resource for staff involved in the financial aid verification process, outlining best practices and standard procedures to maintain compliance and accuracy. The verification correction process follows a two-step approach: 1. Initial Review and Correction: Staff members are required to conduct a thorough review of the required data fields. This involves checking the required ISIR data fields against other supplemental information to identify any discrepancies or inaccuracies. Once identified, corrections are made to ensure that all data aligns with federal and institutional requirements. 2. Final Confirmation and Awarding: After the necessary corrections are implemented, a secondary review is conducted by the Assistant Director to confirm that the adjustments are accurate. This ensures that students receive the correct financial aid awards based on updated and verified information. To maintain transparency, accountability, and an adequate documentation trail. It is imperative that any comments added to student accounts are detailed and include pertinent information regarding the verification process. This documentation serves as a record of the actions taken and aids in future audits and reviews. The Assistant Director of Financial Aid is a very experienced financial aid professional and holds NASFAA certifications in Verification, R2T4, Student Eligibility, Direct Loans and Professional Judgement. The Assistant Director plays a pivotal role in the verification process, being responsible for updating the BPG to reflect any changes in regulations or best practices. Additionally, the Assistant Director will lead training sessions for staff members to ensure they are well-versed in the verification procedures outlined in the BPG. Ongoing training will be provided as needed to accommodate changes in policies or technologies. By implementing this structured approach to verification corrections, the University aims to enhance the accuracy of financial aid processing and improve the overall student experience.
Finding: 2024-002 Enrollment Reporting Responsible Party: Dr. Karen Jarrell, Director of Office of Student Records and Registrar Completion Date: December 30, 2024 The Deputy Registrar from the Office of Student Records (OSR) is responsible for enrollment reporting to the National Student Loan Data ...
Finding: 2024-002 Enrollment Reporting Responsible Party: Dr. Karen Jarrell, Director of Office of Student Records and Registrar Completion Date: December 30, 2024 The Deputy Registrar from the Office of Student Records (OSR) is responsible for enrollment reporting to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). The university uses a servicer, National Student Clearinghouse (NSC) to complete the reporting requirement. Enrollment data is scheduled to be transmitted to the NSC every thirty days to ensure timely reporting to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). The University has consistently met this 30-day reporting to NSC. The audit noted four students had incorrect program start dates in NSLDS from April 2022 and August 2022, each off by one day. The University’s Student Information System (SIS) reflects the correct program start dates, indicating a potential issue in the data transmission between NSC and NSLDS. In July 2022, several announcements were made concerning the technical issues with NSLDS which prevented reporting for periods of time, including “NSLDS Professional Access – Documentation of Enrollment Reporting and Post-screening Delays for Audit Purposes” published on August 31, 2022. The audit noted three errors related to timely reporting. The university’s SIS records indicate these records were reported to NSC within the 30-day timeframe. However, these records were not transmitted from NSC to NSLDS timely. The Deputy Registrar is currently collaborating with the NSC Compliance division to determine the cause of these discrepancies and how best to correct the records in NSLDS. A response from NSC is anticipated by October 31, 2024. The audit also noted three students who were less than full-time that were not reported to NSC or NSLDS. The Deputy Registrar is researching the SIS system rules to determine the root cause of these errors so they can be corrected. The Deputy Registrar will ensure the reporting rules will be corrected by November 30, 2024, and will ensure any less than full time students are corrected in NSLDS by December 30, 2024. To enhance the enrollment reporting process, the Deputy Registrar, Registrar, and Director of Financial Aid will meet with NSC staff and IT staff to establish a method for comparing monthly data submitted to NSC with the data in the NSLDS system. This will help identify any discrepancies for immediate correction. This project is expected to be completed by December 30, 2024.
Condition – Patient co-payments and the Sliding Fee Discount Program adjustments were incorrect for three patients selected. Recommendation – We recommend that procedures be put in place to insure patient data is correctly entered into the billing software. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned...
Condition – Patient co-payments and the Sliding Fee Discount Program adjustments were incorrect for three patients selected. Recommendation – We recommend that procedures be put in place to insure patient data is correctly entered into the billing software. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with the finding and will ensure documentation and processed regarding the Sliding Fee Discount Program are updated and adhered to. Anticipated Date of Completion – In progress, continually. Action Taken – A quality assurance staff will be reviewing information input from various staff into the billing software and providing continuous training to staff as needed. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan – Javier Martinez, Chief Financial Officer.
View Audit 329962 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 512135 (2024-006)
Significant Deficiency 2024
Student Financial Assistance Cluster- Assistance Listing No. 84.268 Finding: The College did not have documentation that Direct Loan Reconciliation was performed. Context: During our testing we identified the March 2024 Direct Loan Reconciliation was not timely performed and documented. Cause: Due t...
Student Financial Assistance Cluster- Assistance Listing No. 84.268 Finding: The College did not have documentation that Direct Loan Reconciliation was performed. Context: During our testing we identified the March 2024 Direct Loan Reconciliation was not timely performed and documented. Cause: Due to staff turnover, direct loan reconciliation for March 2024 was not performed timely. Recommendation: We recommend the College implement a formal review procedure to document that the direct loan reconciliations are performed on a timely basis each month. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: A formal review process was already in place. The issue came from the turnover in the FA department leading to a loss of access. This will be remediated moving forward with more than one FA staff having reporting access and knowledge of reconciliations. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Tina Ballinger Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 11/01/2024
Finding 512130 (2024-005)
Significant Deficiency 2024
Student Financial Assistance Cluster- Assistance Listing No. 84.063, Finding: The College under-awarded funds for the Pell Grant. Context: During our testing, we identified 2 out of 40 students were awarded and disbursed less Pell funds than should have been awarded based on the 23-24 Pell payment s...
Student Financial Assistance Cluster- Assistance Listing No. 84.063, Finding: The College under-awarded funds for the Pell Grant. Context: During our testing, we identified 2 out of 40 students were awarded and disbursed less Pell funds than should have been awarded based on the 23-24 Pell payment schedule. The Pell payment schedule considers the cost of attendance, the student's Expected Family Contribution and the enrollment status of the student. Cause: Student was initially not disbursed Pell funds due to electronic terms & conditions not being completed. However, when the student completed this requirement in the Spring, Pell was not disbursed for the Fall semester Recommendation: We recommend the College review its current procedures for awarding Title IV funds and implement any changes necessary to ensure federal funds are awarded and disbursed in accordance with federal regulations. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: This is due to a loss of knowledge due to turnover within the FA department. Moving forward, knowledge procedures and knowledge will be disseminated to all FA staff to ensure there are no gaps causing a reoccurring issue. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Tina Ballinger Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 11/01/2024
View Audit 329878 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 512121 (2024-004)
Significant Deficiency 2024
Student Financial Assistance Cluster- Assistance Listing No. 84.007, 84.038, 84.063, 84.268 Finding: The College did not properly have documentation of exit counseling notification. Context: During our testing of 40 students, we identified 5 students that did not have documentation of exit counselin...
Student Financial Assistance Cluster- Assistance Listing No. 84.007, 84.038, 84.063, 84.268 Finding: The College did not properly have documentation of exit counseling notification. Context: During our testing of 40 students, we identified 5 students that did not have documentation of exit counseling notification. Cause: The College did not have proper procedures in place to ensure that notification of required exit counseling was sent to applicable students. Recommendation: We recommend the College review reporting processes to ensure all students that require exit counseling receive it in a timely manner Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: This is due to a loss of knowledge due to turnover within the FA department. Moving forward, knowledge about loan exit counseling will be disseminated to all FA staff to ensure there are no gaps causing a reoccurring issue. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Tina Ballinger Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 12/15/2024
Finding 512120 (2024-003)
Significant Deficiency 2024
Student Financial Assistance Cluster- Assistance Listing No. 84.007, 84.038, 84.063, 84.268 Finding: The College did not properly notify students when loans were credited to student's ledger account. Context: During our testing of 40 students, we identified that there were 5 students that did not re...
Student Financial Assistance Cluster- Assistance Listing No. 84.007, 84.038, 84.063, 84.268 Finding: The College did not properly notify students when loans were credited to student's ledger account. Context: During our testing of 40 students, we identified that there were 5 students that did not receive the required notification of Direct Loan disbursements Cause: Due to staff turnover, loan notifications were missed being sent out to students. Recommendation: We recommend the College evaluate its procedures around disbursements of loans and ensure that notifications of disbursements are sent and contain all the required elements outlined in the FSA handbook. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: This is due to a loss of knowledge due to turnover within the FA department. Moving forward, knowledge about loan notifications will be disseminated to all FA staff to ensure there are no gaps causing a reoccurring issue. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Tina Ballinger Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 12/15/2024
Finding 512118 (2024-001)
Significant Deficiency 2024
Student Financial Assistance Cluster- Assistance Listing No. 84.007, 84.033, 84.063, 84.268 Finding: The College used the incorrect withdrawal date when calculating Return to Title IV (R2T4) calculations and did not have formal procedures in place to document review of calculations. Context: During ...
Student Financial Assistance Cluster- Assistance Listing No. 84.007, 84.033, 84.063, 84.268 Finding: The College used the incorrect withdrawal date when calculating Return to Title IV (R2T4) calculations and did not have formal procedures in place to document review of calculations. Context: During our testing, we identified 2 out of 15 R2T4 calculations used an incorrect withdrawal date in their calculation. Also, during our testing, we identified 13 instances of no documentation of a formal review of R2T4 calculations. Cause: The College was using the date a withdrawal form was processed, rather than the date the withdrawal process began. Recommendation: We recommend that the College review policies and procedures related to R2T4 calculations to ensure calculations are performed accurately. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Staff will review policies and procedures and make adjustments as needed to ensure that the calculations are accurate. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Tina Ballinger Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 11/01/2024
View Audit 329878 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 512117 (2024-001)
Material Weakness 2024
Management will provide the USBE with the correct the amount of ESSER funds expended by FTE categories, the number of FTE’s supported with ESSER funds and the total number of FTE positions on September 30, 2023.
Management will provide the USBE with the correct the amount of ESSER funds expended by FTE categories, the number of FTE’s supported with ESSER funds and the total number of FTE positions on September 30, 2023.
Federal Agency Name: Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Number: 93.566 Program Name: Refugee and Entrant Assistance - State Administered Programs Eligibility Finding Summary: a. One instance in which a family was overpaid for one month due to the family obtaining employment...
Federal Agency Name: Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Number: 93.566 Program Name: Refugee and Entrant Assistance - State Administered Programs Eligibility Finding Summary: a. One instance in which a family was overpaid for one month due to the family obtaining employment. b. One instance in which a family was underpaid for one month based upon their family size and eligibility for the month. Additionally, documentation was not retained to support one month's redetermination of eligibility and check copies for two months were not retained to support the payment to the family. c. Three instances in which a family was underpaid based upon their family size and eligibility for the month. d. One instance in which a check was written to a family who out-migrated from the state of South Dakota and the family did not cash the check; however, the expenses remained to be charged under the Refugee Cash Assistance program. Responsible Individuals: Nathan Beyer, Staci Jonson, Dana Boraas Corrective Action Plan: a. The procedures will be reviewed with staff, and an additional review put in place where necessary, to ensure staff are fully trained on how to calculate the proration when a client obtains employment during the month. b. The procedures will be reviewed with staff, and an additional review put in place where necessary, to ensure staff are fully trained on how to calculate family size and eligibility. Additionally, document retention requirements will be reviewed with staff. c. The procedures will be reviewed with staff, and an additional review put in place where necessary, to ensure staff are fully trained on how to calculate family size and eligibility. d. The procedures will be reviewed with staff for removing a client from the program, and notifying appropriate staff to void checks. LSS also implemented a new software program during the fiscal year to make the review process more efficient, and less reliant on manual processes. Checks and balances will be integrated into the software, allowing for electronic review of files. The software will also automate some of the ongoing documentation requirements. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2024
View Audit 329857 Questioned Costs: $1
Federal Agency Name: Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Number: 93.566 Program Name: Refugee and Entrant Assistance - State Administered Programs Reporting Finding Summary: The FFATA report filed for Huron School District included the incorrect Subaward Obligation/Action Da...
Federal Agency Name: Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Number: 93.566 Program Name: Refugee and Entrant Assistance - State Administered Programs Reporting Finding Summary: The FFATA report filed for Huron School District included the incorrect Subaward Obligation/Action Date within the FFATA Subaward Reporting System. Corrective Action Plan: FFATA reporting requirements were reviewed after the 2023 single audit report was received to ensure management has the correct understanding of reporting terms. The report in question was prepared and filed during July 2023 which was prior to the 2023 single audit report being finalized. FFATA reports filed during April 2024 and May 2024 were properly filed. Responsible Individuals: Nathan Beyer, Emily Lyons Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2023
Family Medical Center will have management or assigned staff to review all current sliding fee patients and ensure that the Center has an updated sliding fee application for each. FMC will provide additional training to front desk staff at each site and require them to obtain the proper application ...
Family Medical Center will have management or assigned staff to review all current sliding fee patients and ensure that the Center has an updated sliding fee application for each. FMC will provide additional training to front desk staff at each site and require them to obtain the proper application and documentation. Patient Accounts will review the current application to ensure that the current patients are charged the proper sliding fee scale. Management will develop a training module with Human Resources to have each staff complete in addition to hiring additional staff. This corrective action is expected to be completed by March 31, 2025.
Student Financial Assistance Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 84.268 Recommendation: We recommend the University implement procedures to ensure exit counseling notifications are sent to students who graduated or withdrew. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with ...
Student Financial Assistance Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 84.268 Recommendation: We recommend the University implement procedures to ensure exit counseling notifications are sent to students who graduated or withdrew. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Financial Aid Office will work with our IS department to rebuild the exit counseling notifications so they are more accurate and notify the correct student population. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Jason Hibbert Planned completion date for corrective action plan: March 21, 2025
Student Financial Assistance Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 84.268, 84.063, 84.007, 84.033, 84.379 Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its procedures and policies around reporting disbursements to COD to ensure that student information is reported accurately and timely, and to sto...
Student Financial Assistance Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 84.268, 84.063, 84.007, 84.033, 84.379 Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its procedures and policies around reporting disbursements to COD to ensure that student information is reported accurately and timely, and to store evidence of the key control having occurred. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Financial Aid Office will work with our IS department to rebuild the original PELL unreported disbursements. Any unreported disbursements greater than 7 days will be reported to the financial aid director, information systems, and the vice president for finance and administration via email from Fast. This will allow for a review and timely reporting. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Jason Hibbert Planned completion date for corrective action plan: January 6, 2025.
Student Financial Assistance Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 84.268, 84.063, 84.007, 84.033, 84.379 Recommendation: We recommend the University enhance procedures for reviewing professional judgement to ensure documentation of review is stored. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There ...
Student Financial Assistance Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 84.268, 84.063, 84.007, 84.033, 84.379 Recommendation: We recommend the University enhance procedures for reviewing professional judgement to ensure documentation of review is stored. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Financial Aid office (FAO) plans to do more expansive training for the Financial Aid Administrators upon hire. FAO is exploring the option of National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators training certification for a Professional Judgment credential. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Jason Hibbert Planned completion date for corrective action plan: February 28, 2025
Student Financial Assistance Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 84.268 Recommendation: We recommend that the University review their awarding procedures and implement procedures to ensure direct loans are awarded within student eligibility. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no d...
Student Financial Assistance Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 84.268 Recommendation: We recommend that the University review their awarding procedures and implement procedures to ensure direct loans are awarded within student eligibility. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Financial Aid office (FAO) plans to do more expansive training for the Financial Aid Administrators upon hire. FAO is exploring the option of National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators training certification for a Need Analysis credential. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Jason Hibbert Planned completion date for corrective action plan: February 28, 2025
View Audit 329796 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 512056 (2024-001)
Significant Deficiency 2024
2024-001: Student Financial Assistance Cluster. Assistance Listing Number: 84.268 - Federal Direct Student Loans. Criteria or specific requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 675.16 states whenever an institution di...
2024-001: Student Financial Assistance Cluster. Assistance Listing Number: 84.268 - Federal Direct Student Loans. Criteria or specific requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 675.16 states whenever an institution disburses FWS funds by crediting a student's account and the result is a credit balance, the institution must pay the credit balance directly to the student as soon as possible, but no later than 14 days after the credit balance occurred on the account. Cause: The student's refund was set to be sent out on but it fell on Labor day it didn't get sent out until after the 14 days. Effect: The University is not in compliance with Department of Education requirements that all credit balances be paid directly to the student as soon as possible, but no later than 14 days after the credit balance occurred. Recommendation: We recommend the University implement a process to ensure that any credit balances arising from federal student financial aid are made within the 14 day time limit imposed by the Department of Education. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
VTSU is setting standard procedures for the merged financial aid department, so all personnel are following a standard procedure. In the future, VTSU will not be marking students or using the code for “not verifying” for students who do not enroll. Posting rules are in place that will not allow aid ...
VTSU is setting standard procedures for the merged financial aid department, so all personnel are following a standard procedure. In the future, VTSU will not be marking students or using the code for “not verifying” for students who do not enroll. Posting rules are in place that will not allow aid to post to a students account if verification is incomplete.
Management Response/Corrective Action Plan: Management is being made aware that all federal contractors over $2,000 will need to have the Davis Bacon/prevailing wages clause put on the estimate/quote/bid.
Management Response/Corrective Action Plan: Management is being made aware that all federal contractors over $2,000 will need to have the Davis Bacon/prevailing wages clause put on the estimate/quote/bid.
« 1 347 348 350 351 953 »