FAC Explorer

Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
48,628
In database
Filtered Results
7,124
Matching current filters
Showing Page
274 of 285
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: Questioned Costs
Finding 13101 (2022-001)
Significant Deficiency 2022
Home of Guiding Hands Corporation and Affiliates
CA
Questioned Costs HUD Housing Programs Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking § 200.303
Finding 2022-001 a. Program Information: 14.181 Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities b. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) must establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compli...
Finding 2022-001 a. Program Information: 14.181 Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities b. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) must establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. According to the Anja House Regulatory Agreement, item 5(a) issued by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the mortgager will deposit an amount equal to $173 per month into a reserve fund for replacements in a separate account unless a different date or amount is approved in writing by HUD. c. Condition: Internal controls were not in place to ensure timely compliance with the requirement to deposit the specified amount into the reserve fund account monthly and deposits for the months of December 2021 and June 2022 were not made. Response: a. A process is being implemented that a formal transfer request will be made to the Controller every month detailing the monthly transfers required by HUD using the monthly vouchers received by Home of Guiding Hands. There is an existing process in place to reconcile transfers to the HUD vouchers. This will provide more oversight on these transactions and ensure timely compliance with the requirement to deposit the specified amount into the reserve fund account. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Jan Adams, CFO Anticipated completion date: October 21, 2022
View Audit 17434 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 13099 (2022-017)
Significant Deficiency 2022
City and County of Denver
CO
Questioned Costs Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking § 200.303 § 200.430
2022-017 Finding: - ALN 93.914 ? HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants (Non-Major) / Department of Health and Human Services / Award Number: H89HA00027-28-00, H89HA00027-28-01/ Award Year: 2021 Status: Corrective action in progress Corrective Action: The City agrees with the finding. The review of per...
2022-017 Finding: - ALN 93.914 ? HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants (Non-Major) / Department of Health and Human Services / Award Number: H89HA00027-28-00, H89HA00027-28-01/ Award Year: 2021 Status: Corrective action in progress Corrective Action: The City agrees with the finding. The review of personnel costs that are not 100% allocated to the grant will be reviewed annually as a part of the annual budget planning process. Allocation decisions will be documented and attached to budget planning documents. Person(s) Responsible for Implementing: DDPHE ?Tristan Sanders, Robert George Implementation Date: October 2023
View Audit 17407 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 13037 (2022-003)
Significant Deficiency 2022
Sheppard and Enoch Pratt Foundation, Inc.
MD
Questioned Costs HUD Housing Programs Internal Control / Segregation of Duties
U.S. Department of Labor ? Direct Award Assistance Listing #64.033 ? Supportive Services for Veteran Families Federal Award: 12-MD-042/12-MD-042SS Recipient Organization: Mosaic Community Services, Inc. Finding 2022-003 ? Internal Controls over Cash Disbursements Management acknowledges that the AP...
U.S. Department of Labor ? Direct Award Assistance Listing #64.033 ? Supportive Services for Veteran Families Federal Award: 12-MD-042/12-MD-042SS Recipient Organization: Mosaic Community Services, Inc. Finding 2022-003 ? Internal Controls over Cash Disbursements Management acknowledges that the AP department struggled with managing receipt collection from program staff after purchases were made. Program staff lack of support for purchases was the source of 5 of the 6 findings. Nathan Turner, AP Manager, retired the Mosaic credit card program and centralized the organization on one credit card platform Truist which requires an electronic receipt copy to be held in the system as support and documentation. The system requires a formal electronic approval from managers. This was implemented fully by 3/1/2023.
View Audit 17187 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 13008 (2022-001)
Significant Deficiency 2022
Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission
OR
Questioned Costs Procurement, Suspension & Debarment § 200.320
Bonneville Power Administration: Columbia Basin Pit Tag ? Assistance Listing No. 81.999 Recommendation: CLA recommends the Commission design controls to ensure adequate documentation is maintained to support sole source justifications. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disa...
Bonneville Power Administration: Columbia Basin Pit Tag ? Assistance Listing No. 81.999 Recommendation: CLA recommends the Commission design controls to ensure adequate documentation is maintained to support sole source justifications. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Commission completed sole source justification forms following this finding being brought to attention by the auditors. The plan for fiscal year 2023 is to review all sole source vendors to ensure there is a current and approved sole source justification form on file. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Kathy Ameral and Michael Arredondo Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2023
View Audit 16193 Questioned Costs: $1
Calumet City School District 155
IL
Questioned Costs Reporting Internal Control / Segregation of Duties
Condition: During compliance testing of the District's accounting records to the expenditure report filed with the Illinois State Board of Education, we noted the District double-claimed $2,247 worth of expenditures. Plan: Management will review its policies and procedures and implement changes to...
Condition: During compliance testing of the District's accounting records to the expenditure report filed with the Illinois State Board of Education, we noted the District double-claimed $2,247 worth of expenditures. Plan: Management will review its policies and procedures and implement changes to strengthen internal control over federal reporting. Anticipated Date of Completion: 6/30/2023. Name of Contact Person: Joe Zotto, Superintendent. Management Response: The District will verify all expenditures claimed support the respective accounts on the general ledger.
View Audit 17649 Questioned Costs: $1
Calumet City School District 155
IL
Questioned Costs Reporting Internal Control / Segregation of Duties
Condition: During compliance testing of the District's accounting records to the expenditure report filed with the Illinois State Board of Education, we noted the District double-claimed $2,720 worth of expenditures. Plan: Management will review its policies and procedures and implement changes to...
Condition: During compliance testing of the District's accounting records to the expenditure report filed with the Illinois State Board of Education, we noted the District double-claimed $2,720 worth of expenditures. Plan: Management will review its policies and procedures and implement changes to strengthen internal control over federal reporting. Anticipated Date of Completion: 6/30/2023. Name of Contact Person: Joe Zotto, Superintendent. Management Response: The District will verify all expenditures claimed support the respective accounts on the general ledger.
View Audit 17649 Questioned Costs: $1
Calumet City School District 155
IL
Questioned Costs Reporting Internal Control / Segregation of Duties
Condition: During compliance testing of the District's accounting records to the expenditure report filed with the Illinois State Board of Education, we noted the District claimed $365 worth of expenditures without underlying expenditures on the general ledger. Plan: Management will review its pol...
Condition: During compliance testing of the District's accounting records to the expenditure report filed with the Illinois State Board of Education, we noted the District claimed $365 worth of expenditures without underlying expenditures on the general ledger. Plan: Management will review its policies and procedures and implement changes to strengthen internal control over federal reporting. Anticipated Date of Completion: 6/30/2023. Name of Contact Person: Joe Zotto, Superintendent. Management Response: The District will verify all expenditures claimed support the respective accounts on the general ledger.
View Audit 17649 Questioned Costs: $1
Calumet City School District 155
IL
Questioned Costs Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Cash Management
Condition: The District did not submit their final expenditure report accurately based on the approved budgetary expenditures per function code. Plan: Management will review its policies and procedures and implement changes to strengthen internal control over federal reporting. Anticipated Date of...
Condition: The District did not submit their final expenditure report accurately based on the approved budgetary expenditures per function code. Plan: Management will review its policies and procedures and implement changes to strengthen internal control over federal reporting. Anticipated Date of Completion: 6/30/2023. Name of Contact Person: Joe Zotto, Superintendent. Management Response: The District will verify all expenditures claimed support the respective accounts on the general ledger.
View Audit 17649 Questioned Costs: $1
Calumet City School District 155
IL
Questioned Costs Reporting Internal Control / Segregation of Duties
Condition: During compliance testing of the District accounting records to the expenditure report filed with ISBE, we noted the District claimed $581 worth of expenditures which had not been paid or recorded as of the reporting period. Plan: Management will review its policies and procedures and i...
Condition: During compliance testing of the District accounting records to the expenditure report filed with ISBE, we noted the District claimed $581 worth of expenditures which had not been paid or recorded as of the reporting period. Plan: Management will review its policies and procedures and implement changes to strengthen internal control over federal reporting. Anticipated Date of Completion: 6/30/2023. Name of Contact Person: Joe Zotto, Superintendent. Management Response: The District will verify all expenditures claimed support the respective accounts on the general ledger.
View Audit 17649 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 12961 (2022-001)
Significant Deficiency 2022
Peak Vista Community Health Centers, INC
CO
Questioned Costs Eligibility Subrecipient Monitoring
Condition - Peak Vista determines the sliding fee discount charged to patients based on the patient's annual gross income and household size. We found two encounters where applications were not retained. Therefore, we could not determine if the sliding fee discount applied was in accordance with the...
Condition - Peak Vista determines the sliding fee discount charged to patients based on the patient's annual gross income and household size. We found two encounters where applications were not retained. Therefore, we could not determine if the sliding fee discount applied was in accordance with the guideline. We found two separate encounters where the patient did not meet the guidelines to receive a discount. We found one separate encounter where the patient was charged an incorrect co-pay. Recommendation - We recommend that Peak Vista's procedures be strengthened to ensure income is properly verified and adequately documented and retained. Peak Vista should strengthen processes surrounding monitoring of the program to ensure the Center's policies are consistently and properly applied. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - Management agrees with the finding. Peak Vista has developed a plan for addressing this issue that includes updated procedures, training, and auditing. All teams engaged in the enrollment and eligibility process, including our Enrollment, Reception, and Billing teams will be retrained on the process with emphasis on proper documentation. Peak Vista management plans to incorporate into our quality assurance audits the documentation for single service date discount applications and provide feedback and retraining as necessary to staff as needed. Anticipated Date of Completion - In progress, estimated completion 12/31/2023. Action Taken - We have reviewed the recommendation and have a corrective procedure in place for addressing this issue. Will continue to monitor improvement. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan - Ryan Spillane, CFO
View Audit 17638 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 12888 (2022-001)
Material Weakness 2022
Eastway Corporation
OH
Questioned Costs Reporting Internal Control / Segregation of Duties
2022-001 (a) Comments on Findings and Recommendations: While management concurs with the finding and auditors? recommendation to enhance internal controls to ensure reports are filed timely, it believes the failure to report the Period 2 funds was not due to neglect but simply due to the untimely de...
2022-001 (a) Comments on Findings and Recommendations: While management concurs with the finding and auditors? recommendation to enhance internal controls to ensure reports are filed timely, it believes the failure to report the Period 2 funds was not due to neglect but simply due to the untimely death of an employee. After the death of the Organization?s employee, management called the HRSA Provider Support Line, prior to the original due date of the reporting deadline, and was told that all reports had been filed. The Organization is currently working with HRSA to determine if an exception to the late filing can be obtained for reasonable cause based upon the previously mentioned circumstances. The Organization believes it has fully earned the Provider Relief Funds as it had sufficient lost revenues to support the need for the funding. (b) Action(s) Taken or Planned: Management is aware of the requirements related to the reporting submission. Management intends to implement proper procedures and policies for all grant reporting by June 30, 2023. Furthermore, internal controls over the program are being strengthened to prevent future non-compliance.
View Audit 17350 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 12884 (2022-002)
Material Weakness 2022
Chief Dull Knife College
MT
Questioned Costs Cash Management Procurement, Suspension & Debarment
Finding 2022-2: Cash Management Cash Management: As is the case with most higher education institutions and governmental entities, the College has struggled with the COVID pandemic and its aftermath. Essenti...
Finding 2022-2: Cash Management Cash Management: As is the case with most higher education institutions and governmental entities, the College has struggled with the COVID pandemic and its aftermath. Essential functions were disrupted, including several key accounting, finance, functions due to employees being out sick. Chief Dull Knife College had a discrepancy occur when drawing down funds in which it was done in error twice. The College had more than sufficient money in the bank to cover all of their expenses so this money was not used to cover any expenses. The College will be sure to assign duties to other employees to prevent this type of occurrence. Chief Dull Knife College takes the responsibility of drawing money from Grant Programs very crucial and will make all efforts and policies to ensure this type of error does not occur.
View Audit 17194 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 12873 (2022-001)
Significant Deficiency 2022
Hall County Board of Education
GA
Questioned Costs Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Procurement, Suspension & Debarment § 200.303 § 200.318 § 200.403
FA 2022-001 Improve Controls over Federal Expenditures Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Im...
FA 2022-001 Improve Controls over Federal Expenditures Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education Assistance Listing Number and Title: COVID-19 - 84.4250 - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 - 84.425U - American Rescue Plan Elementary And Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Federal Award Number: S425D210012 (Year: 2021) S45U210012 (Year: 2021) Questioned Costs: $116,610 Repeat of Prior Year Finding: None Description: The policies and procedures of the School District were insufficient to provide adequate internal controls over expenditures as it relates to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program. Corrective Action Plans: We concur with the auditor?s reasoning that the contract terms for services should have been modified to reflect the one-time retention payments for contracted custodial personnel. Retention of contracted custodial staff members was deemed by the District to be an essential part of its effort to ensure clean, sanitary facilities in response to COVID-19 pandemic. ? The District has several internal controls in place to determine and verify the allowability of ESSER expenditures, which include: ? Authorization by the Hall County Board of Education. ? Authorization by the Georgia Department of Education through the ESSER program?s consolidated application. ? Approval of all ESSER payments and purchase orders by relevant personnel familiar with the allowability requirements of the ESSER program. ? Approval of all ESSER contract agreements by relevant personnel familiar with the allowability requirement of the ESER program. ? Documented protocols for determining District personnel eligible to be paid through ESSER funds. The District will conduct a review of its contract with third party service providers to ensure compliance with Uniform Grant Guidance. The District currently has no further plans for the provision of additional retention payments to contracted personnel using ESSER funds, and no additional corrective action is anticipated to be required for the isolated instance. Estimated Completion Date: March 31, 2023 Contact Person: Jonathan C. Boykin Telephone: 770-534-1080 Email: jonathan.boykin@hallco.org
View Audit 17388 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 12856 (2022-001)
Material Weakness 2022
City of Bristol, Connecticut
CT
Questioned Costs Procurement, Suspension & Debarment § 200.318 § 200.326
SINGLE AUDIT CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022 To Government Officials: SINGLE AUDIT FINDINGS: Finding 2022-001 Procurement Description of Finding The City is required to utilize a sealed bidding process...
SINGLE AUDIT CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022 To Government Officials: SINGLE AUDIT FINDINGS: Finding 2022-001 Procurement Description of Finding The City is required to utilize a sealed bidding process for expenditures in excess of the $250,000 threshold per Uniform Guidance. As a result of our testing, we noted two vendors with expenditures in excess of the threshold which did not utilize the sealed bidding process. Statement of Concurrence or Nonconcurrence Management agrees with this finding. Corrective Action Corrective action will be taken to ensure the correct procurement procedures are followed. Name of Contact Person Lynn Boisvert, Director of Finance and Operations Projected Completion Date June 30, 2023
View Audit 17761 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 12850 (2022-002)
Material Weakness 2022
Moniteau School District
PA
Questioned Costs Procurement, Suspension & Debarment
MANAGEMENT?S CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN: Management will review and update as necessary, it?s current procurement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, in specifically, Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidan...
MANAGEMENT?S CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN: Management will review and update as necessary, it?s current procurement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, in specifically, Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance, and 24 PS 8.807.1. The timeframe for completion of this process will commence and be finalized during the District?s 2023-2024 fiscal year and will be revised on an ongoing basis as required by new policy directives from oversight agencies. In addition, management will respond with additional measures considered necessary by the Pennsylvania Department of Education upon review of this finding and management?s corrective action plan.
View Audit 17757 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 12848 (2022-001)
Material Weakness 2022
Moniteau School District
PA
Questioned Costs Procurement, Suspension & Debarment
MANAGEMENT?S CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN: Management will review and update as necessary, it?s current procurement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, in specifically, Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance. The timeframe for comp...
MANAGEMENT?S CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN: Management will review and update as necessary, it?s current procurement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, in specifically, Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) of the Uniform Guidance. The timeframe for completion of this process will commence and be finalized during the District?s 2023-2024 fiscal year and will be revised on an ongoing basis as required by new policy directives from oversight agencies. In addition, management will respond with additional measures considered necessary by the Pennsylvania Department of Education upon review of this finding and management?s corrective action plan.
View Audit 17757 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 12809 (2022-003)
Significant Deficiency 2022
Milwaukee Area Technical College
WI
Questioned Costs Student Financial Aid Period of Performance
Finding No. 2022-003 ? R2T4 Return Calculation Errors Repeat Finding: No ALN and Program: 84.007; 84.033; 84.063; 84.268 ? Student Financial Assistance Cluster Award Amount: $46,751,524 Award Number: N/A Award Year: 7/1/2021-6/30/2022 Criteria: For returns of Title IV Funding when a stud...
Finding No. 2022-003 ? R2T4 Return Calculation Errors Repeat Finding: No ALN and Program: 84.007; 84.033; 84.063; 84.268 ? Student Financial Assistance Cluster Award Amount: $46,751,524 Award Number: N/A Award Year: 7/1/2021-6/30/2022 Criteria: For returns of Title IV Funding when a student does not complete the enrollment period for which funds were disbursed, the amount of earned Title IV grant or loan assistance is calculated by determining the percentage of Title IV grant or loan assistance that has been earned by the student and applying that percentage to the total amount of Title IV grant or loan assistance that was or could have been disbursed to the student for the payment period or period of enrollment as of the student's withdrawal date. Standard term-based institutions must always use the payment period as the basis for the determination. The unearned amount of Title IV assistance to be returned is calculated by subtracting the amount of Title IV assistance earned by the student from the amount of Title IV aid that was disbursed to the student as of the date of the institution's determination that the student withdrew (34 CFR 668.22(e)). Condition / Context: The auditor selected 21 unenrolled students who had Title IV returns for testing. For each student selected, the return amount was incorrectly calculated because the payment period was not used as the basis for the determination. Our sample was statistically valid. Cause: Unauthorized break periods and start dates were used to determine the base period for calculation. MATC's review process was not effective to detect and correct this error. Staff responsible for calculating R2T4 returns were not properly trained in the requirements. Questioned Costs: $5,097 Effect: MATC has determined that a total of 425 returns were incorrectly calculated, with an estimated net error of $5,097. Recommendation: We recommend MATC re-evaluate its review process for Title IV returns, and provide additional training for management and staff to ensure the calculations and compliance requirements are understood and that control processes are operating effectively to ensure proper returns. District Response: MATC agrees with the finding and has developed, documented and implemented a process and correct the student record errors, provide updated training and update R2T4 procedures to ensure proper calculation going forward. Al Pinckney, Executive Director of Financial Aid 12/6/2022
View Audit 17732 Questioned Costs: $1
Rodeo Senior Apartments, Inc.
CA
Questioned Costs HUD Housing Programs Reporting
Finding Number Planned Corrective Action Anticipated Completion Date Responsible Contact Person 2022-001 Management Agent will refund all amounts owed to property per Audit finding. Going forward only HUD approved fees will be charged to property. 12/31/2022 Bipin Patel ? Accounting Manager
Finding Number Planned Corrective Action Anticipated Completion Date Responsible Contact Person 2022-001 Management Agent will refund all amounts owed to property per Audit finding. Going forward only HUD approved fees will be charged to property. 12/31/2022 Bipin Patel ? Accounting Manager
View Audit 17646 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 12722 (2022-001)
Material Weakness 2022
Legacy Health
OR
Questioned Costs Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking § 200.303
Finding 2022-001 Federal program: Provider Relief Fund Assistance Listing Number 93.498 Statement of Condition For 2 of 40 samples of expenditures, the expenditure claimed represented an amount that was claimed twice by the Company in their expenditures reporting in the Provider Relief Fund porta...
Finding 2022-001 Federal program: Provider Relief Fund Assistance Listing Number 93.498 Statement of Condition For 2 of 40 samples of expenditures, the expenditure claimed represented an amount that was claimed twice by the Company in their expenditures reporting in the Provider Relief Fund portal. Additionally, Legacy claimed expenses that were duplicated within the reporting portal. The general distribution report for Legacy Health for Period 1 shows $35,760,843 in expenses applied against the PRF funds in the PRF portal report for Legacy as a consolidated entity. Separately, the stand-alone reports for targeted funds received by Emanuel Hospital & Health Center for Period 1, Legacy Silverton Medical Center for Period 1, Legacy Clinics, LLC for Period 1, and Legacy Meridian Park Hospital for Period 2 also include expenses totaling $12,291,293 that are included in the $35,760,843 listed in the consolidated report above. This results in duplicate reporting of the same expenditures. During testing over reporting and allowability it was observed that the lost revenues attributable to Coronavirus were reported in both the parent entity?s PRF reports on the general distribution payments and the subsidiary entities? PRF reports on the targeted distribution payments (i.e., lost revenues were duplicated). Lost revenues shown on the subsidiary reports as available to be applied against PRF that related to lost revenues also reported in the parent entity?s report were related to Emanuel Hospital & Health Center for Period 1 in the amount of $27,106,110 and Legacy Silverton Medical Center for Period 1 in the amount of $10,269,349. Actions Taken and Status As noted within the portal filing summary, for reporting period 1, Legacy consolidated COVID-19 expenses ($35,760,843) plus lost revenue ($150,037,450) totaled $185,798,293. Payments from the PRF totaled $89,818,954. As a result, there were sufficient qualifying lost revenues to receive and earn all PRF funds received, regardless of the questioned costs above. Therefore, management believes no repayment of PRF funds received would be required. Further, management considered the finding. Reporting for the Legacy parent reporting entity was based on the ?Post-Payment Notice of Reporting Requirements (6/11/21)?, which includes the following requirement: ?Reporting entities will submit consolidated reports.? Neither the methodology utilized by Legacy or application of the methodology advocated by KPMG result in repayment of any of the funds received from the PRF. Management is implementing a process to identify and resolve situations in which reporting requirements are inconclusive, in conflict, or ambiguous. Outside subject matter expertise will be accessed as needed. Person responsible for the implementation of the corrective action plan: Tom Haywood Legacy Health 1919 NW Lovejoy St Portland OR 97219 503-415-5793 thaywood@lhs.org
View Audit 17558 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 12646 (2022-001)
Significant Deficiency 2022
Oak Hill Apartments, Inc.
NC
Questioned Costs HUD Housing Programs
Recommendation: CASA should ensure better document the recertification and HUD tenant assistance payment process to ensure new staff are aware of all required procedures. Further, CASA should ensure adequate training is being provided to all new staff in this role. Views of Responsible Officials an...
Recommendation: CASA should ensure better document the recertification and HUD tenant assistance payment process to ensure new staff are aware of all required procedures. Further, CASA should ensure adequate training is being provided to all new staff in this role. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Personnel have now been properly trained on entering information after recertification occurs. Further, these procedures are now documented.
View Audit 18072 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 12633 (2022-009)
Material Weakness 2022
Barclay College
KS
Questioned Costs Eligibility Material Weakness
MATERIAL WEAKNESS 2022-009 Education Stabilization Fund ? Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund ? 84.425 ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed Condition Students were awarded HEERF aid in June 2022 based upon their outstanding account balance, and they were not given the option to take the disburseme...
MATERIAL WEAKNESS 2022-009 Education Stabilization Fund ? Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund ? 84.425 ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed Condition Students were awarded HEERF aid in June 2022 based upon their outstanding account balance, and they were not given the option to take the disbursement as anything other than a credit to their account. Recommendation We recommend that the institution carefully review guidance regarding new funding sources in order to ensure that all applicable requirements are being met. Actions Taken As of April 1, 2023, the College has contacted the Department of Education in order to determine how best to remedy the situation and will take all actions recommended.
View Audit 17529 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 12632 (2022-008)
Material Weakness 2022
Barclay College
KS
Questioned Costs Cash Management Material Weakness
MATERIAL WEAKNESS 2022-008 Education Stabilization Fund ? Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund ? 84.425 ? Cash Management Condition During testing, it was discovered that funding was drawn down and not disbursed within the required timeframes. Recommendation We recommend that the College revie...
MATERIAL WEAKNESS 2022-008 Education Stabilization Fund ? Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund ? 84.425 ? Cash Management Condition During testing, it was discovered that funding was drawn down and not disbursed within the required timeframes. Recommendation We recommend that the College review its reconciliation process and implement controls to ensure that funding is disbursed within the correct timeframe after being drawn down. Actions Taken As of March 23, 2023, federal funding will only be drawn on a reimbursement basis in order to ensure that funds are disbursed within the required cash management timeframe.
View Audit 17529 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 12624 (2022-004)
Material Weakness 2022
Barclay College
KS
Questioned Costs Student Financial Aid Cash Management
2022-004 Student Financial Assistance Program Cluster ? Title IV ? Cash Management and Special Tests and Provisions ? COD Reconciliation Condition During testing, it was discovered that Pell and Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant (FSEOG) funds were drawn down and not disbursed withi...
2022-004 Student Financial Assistance Program Cluster ? Title IV ? Cash Management and Special Tests and Provisions ? COD Reconciliation Condition During testing, it was discovered that Pell and Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant (FSEOG) funds were drawn down and not disbursed within they required timeframe. In addition, funds were drawn down from Direct Loan sources when they were meant to be drawn from alternative sources. Recommendation We recommend that the institution review its reconciliation process and implement controls to ensure that funding is drawn from correct sources and disbursed within three business days of receipt. Actions Taken Upon request by COD, a repayment of Direct Loan funds was made in order to correct the variance that they noted which was caused by the Alternative Loans that were drawn from the incorrect source. In addition, as of March 23, 2023, a new draw-down process will be implemented. Changes include not drawing down any aid until it is approved by the Director of Financial Aid, confirmation throughout the draw-down process, and better communication between the Accounts Payable/Financial Aid Specialist, Accounts Receivable and the Director of Financial Aid.
View Audit 17529 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 12604 (2022-002)
Material Weakness 2022
Madison County District School Board
FL
Questioned Costs Procurement, Suspension & Debarment
The district is currently working with the Construction company to produce the wage determination records and to revise the contract documents to include the clauses required by Davis-Bacon. The district is working with legal to develop a bid document that includes language related to Davis-Bacon a...
The district is currently working with the Construction company to produce the wage determination records and to revise the contract documents to include the clauses required by Davis-Bacon. The district is working with legal to develop a bid document that includes language related to Davis-Bacon and includes all the required clauses so that future bid awards will be compliant with federal law. No further expenditures will be made with federal funds unless the district has signed agreements/documents with a vendor to comply with Davis-Bacon. The district is also exploring ways to include language on the purchase order documents in Skyward to support compliance with Davis-Bacon. The Finance Department will regularly review any request for construction projects prior to the approval to ensure that documentation will be in place to support federal law.
View Audit 17486 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 12600 (2022-001)
Significant Deficiency 2022
Seneca Housing Corporation
SC
Questioned Costs HUD Housing Programs Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking
Finding #2022-001 Comments on Finding and Recommendation: The Corporation paid management fees of $665 in excess of the amount approved by HUD. The HUD approved management agent certification (Form HUD-9839-B) provides for the payment of management fees equal to 7.3% of residential and miscellaneou...
Finding #2022-001 Comments on Finding and Recommendation: The Corporation paid management fees of $665 in excess of the amount approved by HUD. The HUD approved management agent certification (Form HUD-9839-B) provides for the payment of management fees equal to 7.3% of residential and miscellaneous income collected. Action(s) taken or planned on the finding: Management agrees with the recommendation. The Agent intends to reimburse the Corporation the overpayment of management fees.
View Audit 17470 Questioned Costs: $1
« 1 272 273 275 276 285 »