Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
48,654
In database
Filtered Results
7,124
Matching current filters
Showing Page
237 of 285
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: Questioned Costs
Implemented proper controls where the Title I Coordinator,Wendy, Reed, the General Business Manager, Frankie Tollett, and Bookkeeper, Myra Brand review all program expenditures to ensure they are allowable expenditures. We have contacted DESE for assistance on correcting this. When: July 1, 2023
Implemented proper controls where the Title I Coordinator,Wendy, Reed, the General Business Manager, Frankie Tollett, and Bookkeeper, Myra Brand review all program expenditures to ensure they are allowable expenditures. We have contacted DESE for assistance on correcting this. When: July 1, 2023
View Audit 38287 Questioned Costs: $1
Planned Corrective Action: The Organization will implement a secondary review step in all future Provider Relief Fund (PRF) reporting phases, prior to any finalization and/or submission of the data entered in the PRF Reporting Portal. The secondary review will be conducted by another member of execu...
Planned Corrective Action: The Organization will implement a secondary review step in all future Provider Relief Fund (PRF) reporting phases, prior to any finalization and/or submission of the data entered in the PRF Reporting Portal. The secondary review will be conducted by another member of executive management, with the Chief Executive Officer acting as the primary review while the Organization?s Chief Operating Officer will be the designated backup review. For each subsequent reporting period, the Chief Financial Officer and secondary review will prepare written documentation indicating the date and time this process was completed. The documentation will be maintained with the Organization?s financial records. Anticipated Completion Date: 06/30/2023
View Audit 38372 Questioned Costs: $1
CHP is currently working with its grantor project office for further instructions on this occurrence and will follow the instructions from its project officer as given.
CHP is currently working with its grantor project office for further instructions on this occurrence and will follow the instructions from its project officer as given.
View Audit 38949 Questioned Costs: $1
March 6, 2023 The Assabet Valley Regional Technical High School respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2022. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: Robert E. Brown II, CPA Certified Public Accountants 25 Cemetery Street P.O. Box 23...
March 6, 2023 The Assabet Valley Regional Technical High School respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2022. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: Robert E. Brown II, CPA Certified Public Accountants 25 Cemetery Street P.O. Box 230 Mendon, Massachusetts 01756 Audit period: The finding from the June 30, 2022 schedule of findings and questioned costs is discussed below. The finding is numbered consistently with the number assigned in the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. Department of Education Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance of the Major Programs Finding 2022-001 ? Education Stabilization Fund ? 84.425D & 84.425U Condition: During our test of controls over compliance it was noted that a journal entry posted to the major program moved expenditures that were not included as part of the original application. Criteria: Costs charged to the major programs should meet the requirements as set forth by Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200, subpart E (Cost Principles). Context: During review of journal entries posted to the major program it was noted that one of the journal entries was to allocate guidance counselors payroll for an unspecified time period to the Instructional/Proff Staff expense line of the major program. Effect: Assabet Valley RTHS was not in compliance with the allowable costs/ cost principals requirement as set forth by the Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200, subpart E (Cost Principles). Questioned Costs: Questioned costs of $5,252.88 Cause: Grant should have been amended Identification as a Repeat Finding: 2021-002 Recommendation: We recommend the Assabet Valley RTHS follow procedures to ensure that expenditures charged to the grants are allowable costs as set forth by Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200, subpart E (Cost Principles) Responsible for Corrective Plan: Maria Silva, Director of Business Operations Estimated Completion Date: 6/30//2023 Action Taken: The District agrees with the recommendation and will work on setting up more controls
View Audit 39493 Questioned Costs: $1
#2022-004 - Special Tests and Provisions - Security Deposits Description: Funds collected as a security deposit shall be kept in the name of the project, separate and apart from all other funds of the project in a trust account. The amount of this account shall always equal or exceed the aggregate ...
#2022-004 - Special Tests and Provisions - Security Deposits Description: Funds collected as a security deposit shall be kept in the name of the project, separate and apart from all other funds of the project in a trust account. The amount of this account shall always equal or exceed the aggregate of all outstanding obligations under that account. Action Taken: The security deposit liability was in the process of reconciliation at year end and when noted that the liability exceeded the cash account a deposit was made effective January 3, 2023 to alleviate the deficiency.
View Audit 39156 Questioned Costs: $1
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Name and Number of the Project: AAMHA Babcock North, L.P. HUD No. 115-11305 Audit Firm: M Group, LLP Audit Period: The year ended December 31, 2022 Compliance Review C. COMMENTS ON FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS We concur with the findings and recommendations of our auditors reg...
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Name and Number of the Project: AAMHA Babcock North, L.P. HUD No. 115-11305 Audit Firm: M Group, LLP Audit Period: The year ended December 31, 2022 Compliance Review C. COMMENTS ON FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS We concur with the findings and recommendations of our auditors regarding our noncompliance as cited in the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs. ACTIONS TAKEN FINDING 2022-003: Section 223(f) HUD Insured Loan, CFDA 14.155 CORRECTIVE ACTION COMPLETED: Management will monitor and reconcile the cash receipts received from San Antonio Housing Authority. On February 15, 2023, the Company received $45,629 from the affiliated property. Finding 2022-003 Cleared. We have prepared the corrective action plan as required by the standards applicable to financial statements contained in Government Auditing Standards and by the audit requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Any questions regarding the above corrective action plan should be directed to Brandi Vitier, Board Member.
View Audit 39155 Questioned Costs: $1
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Name and Number of the Project: AAMHA KPTP, LLC HUD No. 115-35652 Audit Firm: M Group, LLP Audit Period: The year ended December 31, 2022 Compliance Review B. COMMENTS ON FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS We concur with the findings and recommendations of our auditors regarding our...
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Name and Number of the Project: AAMHA KPTP, LLC HUD No. 115-35652 Audit Firm: M Group, LLP Audit Period: The year ended December 31, 2022 Compliance Review B. COMMENTS ON FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS We concur with the findings and recommendations of our auditors regarding our noncompliance as cited in the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs. ACTIONS TAKEN FINDING 2022-002: Section 223(a)(7) HUD Insured Loan, CFDA 14.135 CORRECTIVE ACTION COMPLETED: Management will review the HUD Regulatory Agreement to ensure compliance governing surplus cash calculation and distributions. On March 28, 2023, Alamo repaid $61,764 to the Project. Finding 2022-002 Cleared. We have prepared the corrective action plan as required by the standards applicable to financial statements contained in Government Auditing Standards and by the audit requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principals, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Any questions regarding the above corrective action plan should be directed to Brandi Vitier, Board Member.
View Audit 39155 Questioned Costs: $1
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2022 Name of Audit: The Maples Housing Corporation HUD Project Number: 084-HD055 Name of Audit Firm: Welch & Associates, LLC Period Covered by Audit: Year Ending December 31, 2022 Corrective Action Plan Prepared by: Name: Rodney Potter Position:...
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2022 Name of Audit: The Maples Housing Corporation HUD Project Number: 084-HD055 Name of Audit Firm: Welch & Associates, LLC Period Covered by Audit: Year Ending December 31, 2022 Corrective Action Plan Prepared by: Name: Rodney Potter Position: Assistant Executive Director Telephone Number: (816) 364-3827 Findings-Financial Statement Audit None Findings-Federal Award Programs Audit Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program: Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities ? Section 811 Assistance Listing Number: 14.181 Finding 2022-002 Comments on Findings and Each Recommendation The Maples Housing Corporation agrees with the auditors? finding and recommendation. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding We will ensure a current and approved HUD Form 9839-B is on file. The form has been submitted to HUD for approval on March 22, 2023.
View Audit 40581 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding ref number: 2022-001 Finding caption: The District did not have adequate internal controls for ensuring compliance with allowable activities and costs, and restricted purpose requirements. Name, address, and telephone of District contact person: Caryn Metsker, Director of Financial Service...
Finding ref number: 2022-001 Finding caption: The District did not have adequate internal controls for ensuring compliance with allowable activities and costs, and restricted purpose requirements. Name, address, and telephone of District contact person: Caryn Metsker, Director of Financial Services 800 Eastmont Avenue East Wenatchee, WA 98802-4443 509-888-4686 Corrective action the auditee plans to take in response to the finding: The District does not concur with the finding or questioned costs. SAO reviewed various types of documentation and chose not to accept any documentation presented by the District to even consider reducing questioned costs. The standard of documentation required by SAO to satisfy ?unmet? need in would have been hard to meet even if the District hadn?t been in the midst of a pandemic. The District has internal controls over asset inventory and provided equipment only to students and staff with unmet needs, and all costs were allowable, reasonable and necessary. We look forward to working with the FCC or other appropriate agency to resolve this finding and we appreciate the guidance that was provided by the FCC, as noted below. Guidance from the FCC Devices for remote learning could also be used at school. During the pandemic in Washington State we experienced times when classrooms, schools and or districts were closed by health department and state regulations because of outbreaks. Districts had to be prepared to support remote learning each day with constantly changing guidance on who was allowed to be in person. The following guidance from the Federal Communications Commission, titled ?Emergency Connectivity Fund Common Misconceptions?, ?Misconception #2: If schools have returned to in-class instruction for the upcoming school year, they are not eligible to participate. Answer: This is false. Equipment and services provided to students or school staff who would otherwise lack sufficient access to connected devices, and/or broadband internet access connection while off campus are eligible for Emergency Connectivity Fund Support.? From the Federal Communications Commission Order FCC-CIRC21-93-043021, question 77: ?We think schools are in the best position to determine whether their students and staff have devices and broadband services sufficient to meet their remote learning needs, and we recognize that they are making such decisions in the midst of a pandemic. We, therefore, will not impose any specific metrics or process requirements on those determinations.? And from question 51: ?...we are sensitive to the need to provide some flexibility during this uncertain time. If those connected devices were purchased for the purpose of providing students...with devices for off-campus use consistent with the rules we adopt today, we will not prohibit such on-campus use.? Anticipated date to complete the corrective action: N/A
View Audit 39597 Questioned Costs: $1
Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials The District is aware of this incorrect charge and has implemented procedures that include verification of the appropriateness of indirect costs charged to restricted programs.
Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials The District is aware of this incorrect charge and has implemented procedures that include verification of the appropriateness of indirect costs charged to restricted programs.
View Audit 39591 Questioned Costs: $1
Recommendation: The Organization should perform its own calculation of surplus cash and remit required deposits to the residual receipts account within 60 days after year-end as required by HUD. Action Take: The deposit that was due for the year ended September 30, 2021, the year under audit, of $28...
Recommendation: The Organization should perform its own calculation of surplus cash and remit required deposits to the residual receipts account within 60 days after year-end as required by HUD. Action Take: The deposit that was due for the year ended September 30, 2021, the year under audit, of $28,545 was not made until January 7, 2022.
View Audit 38247 Questioned Costs: $1
Recommendation: Management continues to redesign the control around this process to identify and correct such items on a timely basis and has hired new personnel to administer the control. We recommend the management company communicate written policies with clearly defined roles to its employees re...
Recommendation: Management continues to redesign the control around this process to identify and correct such items on a timely basis and has hired new personnel to administer the control. We recommend the management company communicate written policies with clearly defined roles to its employees regarding approval of vendor payments and financial statement reviews. Action Taken: Duplicate payments continue to be made to vendors. Management continues to redesign the control around this process to identify and correct such items on a timely basis and has hired new personnel to administer the control.
View Audit 38247 Questioned Costs: $1
Recommendation: Management personnel should monitor cash flows on a monthly basis in line with budget and correct the large amount of vendor overpayments that continue to occur (see finding 2020-001) in order to appropriately meet the current and future needs of the property and pay the delinquent d...
Recommendation: Management personnel should monitor cash flows on a monthly basis in line with budget and correct the large amount of vendor overpayments that continue to occur (see finding 2020-001) in order to appropriately meet the current and future needs of the property and pay the delinquent deposits. Action Taken: Management is reviewing the current year budget, claiming refunds from vendors, reviewing liabilities, and other cash needs of the Organization to determine the appropriate time to pay in the delinquent deposits to the replacement reserve.
View Audit 38247 Questioned Costs: $1
Recommendation: The Organization should have more qualified personnel performing tenant file compliance. It should also have a second person reviewing files for compliance either on a test basis or for all files. Action Taken: In process of correcting documentation, adjusting tenant rent as necessar...
Recommendation: The Organization should have more qualified personnel performing tenant file compliance. It should also have a second person reviewing files for compliance either on a test basis or for all files. Action Taken: In process of correcting documentation, adjusting tenant rent as necessary and claiming repayments due to HUD.
View Audit 38247 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 42263 (2022-003)
Significant Deficiency 2022
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: We agree with the auditor?s findings and recognize that some customers did received funding beyond the June 15, 2021 deadline. BWP calculated the daily average arrears for each customer with 60 plus days arrears during the program pand...
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: We agree with the auditor?s findings and recognize that some customers did received funding beyond the June 15, 2021 deadline. BWP calculated the daily average arrears for each customer with 60 plus days arrears during the program pandemic period and cross referenced it with the actual past due balances as of June 15, 2021 to ensure no arrears prior to March 4, 2020 were included. Prior to the pandemic, BWP did not have sufficient arrearage data to easily calculate the credits, hence BWP relied on a data search methodology that estimated qualified customer balances to apply funds. Since the pandemic, BWP has changed its reporting on customer arrearages. BWP will run a daily aging report that will be used to calculate customer arrearages incurred during a specific period. Before credits are authorized, BWP Customer Service will manually spot-check the data set to verify accuracy. With regards to review of Federal grants awarded, BWP holds a monthly meeting with key personnel and an outside grants administrator to get status updates of pursued and/or awarded grants, including any federally funded grants. The Financial Accounting Manager-BWP and Principal Utility Accounting Analyst now attend this meeting. The Principal Utility Accounting Analyst will be responsible for timely communication of all key Federal grants data to City Finance and will prepare an annual schedule for all grant funding received/spent through the general ledger. In addition, BWP?s Legislative Analyst and BWP Finance staff will cross check records to timely reconcile grant reporting/activity.
View Audit 48309 Questioned Costs: $1
Management is implementing an enhanced, more detailed invoice review process where invoices will be reviewed irrespective of materiality by leadership on the RETAIN team. In addition, the invoice process will include periodic meetings to go through expenditures in detail prior to invoice submission...
Management is implementing an enhanced, more detailed invoice review process where invoices will be reviewed irrespective of materiality by leadership on the RETAIN team. In addition, the invoice process will include periodic meetings to go through expenditures in detail prior to invoice submission. The contacts for this finding are Kori Smith, RETAIN Program Manager, KASmith4@mercy.com and Alice Parisi, Foundation System Director, Alice_Parisi@mercy.com.
View Audit 47065 Questioned Costs: $1
THE DUTIES WILL BE SEGREGATED AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WILL REMAIN INVOLVED IN THE FINANCIAL AFFAIRS OF THE CENTER TO PROVIDE OVERSIGHT AND INDEPENDENT REVIEW FUNCTIONS.
THE DUTIES WILL BE SEGREGATED AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WILL REMAIN INVOLVED IN THE FINANCIAL AFFAIRS OF THE CENTER TO PROVIDE OVERSIGHT AND INDEPENDENT REVIEW FUNCTIONS.
View Audit 45006 Questioned Costs: $1
Incorrect Pell Calculations Planned Corrective Action: The Pillar College financial aid office and third-party servicer utilizes the upgraded automated student information system that triggers an activity when a student?s enrollment status has increased to full time or lessened from their initial e...
Incorrect Pell Calculations Planned Corrective Action: The Pillar College financial aid office and third-party servicer utilizes the upgraded automated student information system that triggers an activity when a student?s enrollment status has increased to full time or lessened from their initial enrollment status. Reports will be run to ensure the enrollment changes are captured and Pell is adjusted accordingly. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Betzi Schroeder, Financial Aid Office Anticipated Date of Completion: current
View Audit 46355 Questioned Costs: $1
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions ? PFH Management has reviewed the procedures surrounding funding match and made the necessary changes to ensure compliance. Additional training has also occurred and is ongoing with accounting as well as program staff and new monitoring ...
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions ? PFH Management has reviewed the procedures surrounding funding match and made the necessary changes to ensure compliance. Additional training has also occurred and is ongoing with accounting as well as program staff and new monitoring steps designed and implemented.
View Audit 38591 Questioned Costs: $1
The current management agent will request that the prior management agent reimburse the property for the overpaid management fee.
The current management agent will request that the prior management agent reimburse the property for the overpaid management fee.
View Audit 39066 Questioned Costs: $1
The current management agent has requested supporting documentation from the prior management agent but has not received documentation as of this date.
The current management agent has requested supporting documentation from the prior management agent but has not received documentation as of this date.
View Audit 39066 Questioned Costs: $1
The current management agent has requested supporting documentation from the prior management agent but has not received documentation as of this date.
The current management agent has requested supporting documentation from the prior management agent but has not received documentation as of this date.
View Audit 39066 Questioned Costs: $1
The current management agent will request that the prior management agent reimburse the property for the overpaid management fee.
The current management agent will request that the prior management agent reimburse the property for the overpaid management fee.
View Audit 39062 Questioned Costs: $1
The current management agent has requested supporting documentation from the prior management agent but has not received documentation as of this date.
The current management agent has requested supporting documentation from the prior management agent but has not received documentation as of this date.
View Audit 39062 Questioned Costs: $1
The current management agent has requested supporting documentation from the prior management agent but has not received documentation as of this date.
The current management agent has requested supporting documentation from the prior management agent but has not received documentation as of this date.
View Audit 39062 Questioned Costs: $1
« 1 235 236 238 239 285 »