Audit 39066

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$1.45M
Findings
14
Programs
1
Organization: Statewide Bay Landing Ii, Inc. (RI)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-03-14
Auditor: D'ambra CPA

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
42177 2022-002 - - L
42178 2022-003 - - C
42179 2022-004 - - B
42180 2022-005 - - B
42181 2022-006 - - C
42182 2022-007 - - B
42183 2022-001 - - N
618619 2022-002 - - L
618620 2022-003 - - C
618621 2022-004 - - B
618622 2022-005 - - B
618623 2022-006 - - C
618624 2022-007 - - B
618625 2022-001 - - N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.157 Supportive Housing for the Elderly $115,105 Yes 1

Contacts

Name Title Type
DAMXRSX8WR25 Cynthia Langlykke Auditee
4015952321 Craig D'ambra Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Loan/loan guarantee outstanding balances Accounting Policies: 1. The schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal award activity of the Corporation. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Corporation, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Corporation.2. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The Corporation has elected not to use the 10 percent de-minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.3. The Corporation received loan(s) directly or indirectly from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development which is (are) included above. If there were no current year advances on the loan, the loan balance above reflects the beginning of the year balance. If there were advances on the loan, the loan balance above reflects the highest balance during the year.4.Certain grants, while fully expended, contain continuing compliance requirements and are thus included in the Schedule. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY (14.157) - Balances outstanding at the end of the audit period were 1339800.

Finding Details

Federal program - Section 202: Criteria - Federal regulations require the Corporation to file an annual Data Collection Form with the Single Audit Clearing House; Condition - the last year submitted was 12/31/2019; Cause - the prior auditor did not complete the form for owner signature and submission; Recommendation - the owner representative should notify the prior auditor to complete the form for 2020 and 2021 so that the owner can file the annual Data Collection forms for the omitted years. Response: The owner representative has notified the prior auditor to complete the missing years? form and, upon their completion, will file the Data Collection form for the missing years.
Federal program - Section 202: Criteria - HUD regulations specify the amount required to be deposited on a monthly basis to the replacement reserve account.; Condition - one month?s deposit was made late by the prior management agent and one month?s deposit totaling $3,242 was not made by the current management agent; Cause - the late deposit was due to the property experiencing a cash flow problem and was unable to make the deposit timely, the missed deposit by the current management agent was due to the timing of the transition of the management from one agent to another; Recommendation - the current management agent should make the necessary deposit and make every effort to deposit the monthly required amounts to the reserve account. Response: Subsequent to year end the current management agent made the necessary deposit and will make the required monthly deposits timely in the future.
Federal program - Section 202: Criteria: HUD regulations state that only eligible and allowed costs relating to the property are allowed; Condition: I was unable to test the prior management agent?s payroll charged to the property totaling $17,825; Cause: supporting documentation for the charges were not made available for testing; Effect: the property may have been overcharged for payroll and related benefits; Recommendation: the current management agent should obtain the necessary documentation to support the charges paid or request the prior management agent reimburse the property. Response: The current management agent has attempted to request the supporting documentation but has been unsuccessful.
Federal program - Section 202: Criteria: HUD regulations and the management agreement state that amounts charged to the property by an Identity of Interest firm should be reasonable based on arm?s length contracts generally accomplished by obtaining bids; Condition: the property was charged $19,067 by a company owned by the prior management agent without obtaining bids to support that the charges were reasonable; Cause: the prior management agent did not obtain bids; Effect: the property may have been overcharged for the related expenses totaling $19,067; Recommendation: the current management agent should obtain the necessary documentation to support the charges paid or request the prior management agent reimburse the property. Response: The current management agent has attempted to request the supporting documentation but has been unsuccessful.
Federal program - Section 202: Criteria: HUD regulations specify that management maintain adequate books and records; Condition: I was unable to test the prior management agent?s cash receipts recorded; Cause: supporting documentation for the cash receipts were not made available for testing; Effect: the property records may be incomplete; Recommendation: the current management agent should obtain the necessary documentation to support the cash receipts recorded by the prior management agent. Response: The current management agent has attempted to request the supporting documentation but has been unsuccessful.
Federal program - Section 202: Criteria: The management agreement specifies the calculation of management fees due the agent; Condition: the prior management agent overpaid the management fee totaling $792; Cause: unknown; Effect: the management fee was overpaid $792; Recommendation: the current management agent should request that the prior management agent reimburse the property for the overpayment. Response: The current management agent will request that the prior management agent reimburse the property for the overpaid management fee.
Federal program - Section 202: Criteria: The HUD Occupancy handbook specifies the nature and content of the tenant income annual recertification; Condition: in testing tenant recertification files, I noted the following errors- no EIV obtained (2 of 2 files); Cause: the prior management did not retain the required EIV in the tenant file; Effect: tenants recertification may be incorrect; Recommendation: Management should retain the required EIV?s in tenant files. Response: The new management agent does retain the required EIV in the tenant files.
Federal program - Section 202: Criteria - Federal regulations require the Corporation to file an annual Data Collection Form with the Single Audit Clearing House; Condition - the last year submitted was 12/31/2019; Cause - the prior auditor did not complete the form for owner signature and submission; Recommendation - the owner representative should notify the prior auditor to complete the form for 2020 and 2021 so that the owner can file the annual Data Collection forms for the omitted years. Response: The owner representative has notified the prior auditor to complete the missing years? form and, upon their completion, will file the Data Collection form for the missing years.
Federal program - Section 202: Criteria - HUD regulations specify the amount required to be deposited on a monthly basis to the replacement reserve account.; Condition - one month?s deposit was made late by the prior management agent and one month?s deposit totaling $3,242 was not made by the current management agent; Cause - the late deposit was due to the property experiencing a cash flow problem and was unable to make the deposit timely, the missed deposit by the current management agent was due to the timing of the transition of the management from one agent to another; Recommendation - the current management agent should make the necessary deposit and make every effort to deposit the monthly required amounts to the reserve account. Response: Subsequent to year end the current management agent made the necessary deposit and will make the required monthly deposits timely in the future.
Federal program - Section 202: Criteria: HUD regulations state that only eligible and allowed costs relating to the property are allowed; Condition: I was unable to test the prior management agent?s payroll charged to the property totaling $17,825; Cause: supporting documentation for the charges were not made available for testing; Effect: the property may have been overcharged for payroll and related benefits; Recommendation: the current management agent should obtain the necessary documentation to support the charges paid or request the prior management agent reimburse the property. Response: The current management agent has attempted to request the supporting documentation but has been unsuccessful.
Federal program - Section 202: Criteria: HUD regulations and the management agreement state that amounts charged to the property by an Identity of Interest firm should be reasonable based on arm?s length contracts generally accomplished by obtaining bids; Condition: the property was charged $19,067 by a company owned by the prior management agent without obtaining bids to support that the charges were reasonable; Cause: the prior management agent did not obtain bids; Effect: the property may have been overcharged for the related expenses totaling $19,067; Recommendation: the current management agent should obtain the necessary documentation to support the charges paid or request the prior management agent reimburse the property. Response: The current management agent has attempted to request the supporting documentation but has been unsuccessful.
Federal program - Section 202: Criteria: HUD regulations specify that management maintain adequate books and records; Condition: I was unable to test the prior management agent?s cash receipts recorded; Cause: supporting documentation for the cash receipts were not made available for testing; Effect: the property records may be incomplete; Recommendation: the current management agent should obtain the necessary documentation to support the cash receipts recorded by the prior management agent. Response: The current management agent has attempted to request the supporting documentation but has been unsuccessful.
Federal program - Section 202: Criteria: The management agreement specifies the calculation of management fees due the agent; Condition: the prior management agent overpaid the management fee totaling $792; Cause: unknown; Effect: the management fee was overpaid $792; Recommendation: the current management agent should request that the prior management agent reimburse the property for the overpayment. Response: The current management agent will request that the prior management agent reimburse the property for the overpaid management fee.
Federal program - Section 202: Criteria: The HUD Occupancy handbook specifies the nature and content of the tenant income annual recertification; Condition: in testing tenant recertification files, I noted the following errors- no EIV obtained (2 of 2 files); Cause: the prior management did not retain the required EIV in the tenant file; Effect: tenants recertification may be incorrect; Recommendation: Management should retain the required EIV?s in tenant files. Response: The new management agent does retain the required EIV in the tenant files.