Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
48,772
In database
Filtered Results
7,124
Matching current filters
Showing Page
136 of 285
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: Questioned Costs
BVCASA agrees and has already taken corrective action by reconfiguring the system to break out reportable and nonreportable expenditures to ensure the appropriate amount of indirect costs is reported as well as performing a more detailed review of the indirect cost allocation each month.
BVCASA agrees and has already taken corrective action by reconfiguring the system to break out reportable and nonreportable expenditures to ensure the appropriate amount of indirect costs is reported as well as performing a more detailed review of the indirect cost allocation each month.
View Audit 307039 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding Number: 2023-002 Condition: The Society did not have documentation to support that two covered transactions were checked for potential suspension or debarment before entering into the transaction. There was one covered transaction where the Society did not have documentation to support the p...
Finding Number: 2023-002 Condition: The Society did not have documentation to support that two covered transactions were checked for potential suspension or debarment before entering into the transaction. There was one covered transaction where the Society did not have documentation to support the procurement process followed or that more than one vendor was reviewed for pricing before selecting the vendor chosen. Planned Corrective Action: Staff turnover in early 2023 resulted in limited capacity for dedicated staff to check for potential suspension or debarment before adding vendors to the system. We have dedicated staff who will be managing this process going forward. The Society has written procurement policies and procedures. Key leadership stakeholders have been apprised of our policies and procedures. The Society will be implementing a training series for government funded procurement stakeholders within the Society to ensure compliance. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Dharshni Sabapathy, Senior Director of Accounting Anticipated Completion Date: April 25, 2024
View Audit 307016 Questioned Costs: $1
Section 202 Capital Advance – Assistance Listing No. 14.157 Recommendation: Accounting staff should reconcile the Replacement Reserve account on a periodic (monthly or quarterly) basis to ensure the monthly transfers are being made. Management should also make the deposit to fully fund the replaceme...
Section 202 Capital Advance – Assistance Listing No. 14.157 Recommendation: Accounting staff should reconcile the Replacement Reserve account on a periodic (monthly or quarterly) basis to ensure the monthly transfers are being made. Management should also make the deposit to fully fund the replacement reserve as soon as possible. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Management is in agreement with the finding and has since corrected the issue. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Chuck Armstrong, Director Independent & Affordable Living Planned completion date for corrective action plan: September 30, 2023
View Audit 307011 Questioned Costs: $1
Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan Finding 2023-002 - Non-Compliance with Financial Need Requirements for Subsidized Direct Loans in Non-Standard Semesters Grantor: U.S. Department of Education Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing#: 84.268 Award Titles: Federa...
Management's Views and Corrective Action Plan Finding 2023-002 - Non-Compliance with Financial Need Requirements for Subsidized Direct Loans in Non-Standard Semesters Grantor: U.S. Department of Education Program: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing#: 84.268 Award Titles: Federal Direct Student Loan Program Program Award Years: 7/2022 - 6/2024 Management agrees with the finding and proposes the following corrective action plan: Corrective Action Plan: When a student attends a standard semester (Fall and Winter), PeopleSoft uses the Prorated Estimated Family Contribution (EFC) Methodology to determine the subsidized loan eligibility based on their EFC. When a student attends a non-standard term (Spring), PeopleSoft uses the Automatic Zero EFC Methodology and offers subsidized loans to all students rather than the subsidized loan eligibility based on their EFC. Tammie Fonoimoana, Financial Aid & Scholarships Senior Manager, will work to update the PeopleSoft system to use the Prorated EFC Methodology for calculating subsidized loan eligibility for both standard and non-standard terms. In addition, Tammie Fonoimoana, Financial Aid & Scholarships Senior Manager, who is responsible for packaging and awarding of Financial Aid at Brigham Young University- Hawaii will continue to provide training to the staff who administer Title IV aid to ensure they are aware of the changes in packaging and awarding subsidized loans for the non-standard term (Spring). Also, Tammie Fonoimoana will oversee the implementation of controls wherein the University will implement preventative mechanisms to verify financial aid packages are calculated correctly. Timing: Tammie Fonoimoana, Financial Aid & Scholarships Senior Manager, will be responsible for overseeing that the items as noted in the corrective action plan section above will be implemented by July 1, 2024. Signed and Acknowledged, Tammie Fonoimoana, Senior Manager BYU-Hawaii Financial Aid & Scholarships Tammie.fonoimoana@byuh.edu 808-675-4737
View Audit 306965 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding ref number: 2023-001 Finding caption: The District did not have adequate internal controls for ensuring compliance with allowable activities and costs and restricted purpose requirements. Name, address, and telephone of District contact person: Cathie Seevers 134 Marion Ave N Bremerton, WA 9...
Finding ref number: 2023-001 Finding caption: The District did not have adequate internal controls for ensuring compliance with allowable activities and costs and restricted purpose requirements. Name, address, and telephone of District contact person: Cathie Seevers 134 Marion Ave N Bremerton, WA 98312 360-473-1034 Corrective action the auditee plans to take in response to the finding: This audit finding is for ECF Funds that were awarded through the FCC. While we thought we complied when purchasing chrome books for hybrid learning, there were some other requirements that we were not able to document. Because our asset management system does not retain a list of previous ‘owners’ of each chrome book (the system replaces that student with the new student’s name and does not keep the history) we were unable to tell you exactly what student had several of our chrome books at that snapshot in time. We are now aware of the importance of this feature and will record these differently to maintain a history of users. BSD does not intend to use any more ECF funds. Anticipated date to complete the corrective action: May 1, 2024
View Audit 306962 Questioned Costs: $1
Corrective Action Plan Prepared by: Name: Dave Cooper Position: President, Community Reinvestment Foundation, Inc. Telephone Number: 317-554-2100 A. Current Findings on the Schedule of Findings, Questioned Costs, and Recommendations Finding No. 2023-001 A. Comments on the Finding and Eac...
Corrective Action Plan Prepared by: Name: Dave Cooper Position: President, Community Reinvestment Foundation, Inc. Telephone Number: 317-554-2100 A. Current Findings on the Schedule of Findings, Questioned Costs, and Recommendations Finding No. 2023-001 A. Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation: Management agrees with the finding. Management is aware withdrawals from reserve must have HUD approval and account must be fully funded. B. Action Taken or Planned on the Finding: Management will deposit the funds into the replacement reserve when available.
View Audit 306902 Questioned Costs: $1
Federal ESSER Funding was released in waves following the COVID-19 pandemic. The compliance for reporting and audits of these pandemic-related funds was new for staff across the state of California. Given this, staff did not send a capital outlay pre-approval request for technology equipment. Furthe...
Federal ESSER Funding was released in waves following the COVID-19 pandemic. The compliance for reporting and audits of these pandemic-related funds was new for staff across the state of California. Given this, staff did not send a capital outlay pre-approval request for technology equipment. Furthermore, more close oversight was needed regarding a multi-year subscription for a technology firewall that exceeded the grant timelines. Moving forward, the CBO and Assistant Directors of Finance and Accounting will work to ensure there are more layers of approval for Capital Outlay expenditures, especially as they relate to restricted categorical resources.
View Audit 306901 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 398167 (2023-001)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Calculation errors identified during the 2023 Single Audit resulted in a variance between lost revenues and federal program funding received. To correct this variance, lost revenue calculations were updated to adjust patient care revenue to better align with program funding requirements for applica...
Calculation errors identified during the 2023 Single Audit resulted in a variance between lost revenues and federal program funding received. To correct this variance, lost revenue calculations were updated to adjust patient care revenue to better align with program funding requirements for applicable periods. To account for the questioned costs identified, additional expenses of approximately $460,000 were identified and meet program requirements for allowable expenses related to prevention, mitigation, and response to COVID-19.
View Audit 306883 Questioned Costs: $1
MANAGEMENT AGREES WITH THE FINDING. MANAGEMENT HAS SUBMITTED THE FORMS FOR HUD'S RETROACTIVE APPROVAL.
MANAGEMENT AGREES WITH THE FINDING. MANAGEMENT HAS SUBMITTED THE FORMS FOR HUD'S RETROACTIVE APPROVAL.
View Audit 306850 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 398065 (2023-002)
Significant Deficiency 2023
2023-002 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Recommendation: We recommend the County establish internal control procedures to ensure that all amounts charged to grant programs for employee payroll costs be reconciled to the specific employee payroll records and...
2023-002 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Recommendation: We recommend the County establish internal control procedures to ensure that all amounts charged to grant programs for employee payroll costs be reconciled to the specific employee payroll records and that supporting documentation be maintained throughout the grant award period and beyond. Views of responsible officials: Management concurs with the finding. There were minimal variances in the number of employees tested and the County believes the wage report discrepancies are isolated due to the complexity of the EMS salary structure. The County claimed $26,038,852 of the $37,618,256 total eligible expenses available. Action planned/taken in response to finding: Effective fiscal year 2024, Management will implement the following corrective action: The County will create a process to ensure the payroll wage reports generated by Human Resources agrees to support documentation. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action plan: Pete Winton Planned completion date for corrective action plan: The above action plan will be implemented in fiscal year 2024.
View Audit 306784 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding ref number: 2023-001 Finding caption: The District did not have adequate internal controls for ensuring compliance with allowable activities and costs and restricted purpose requirements. Name, address, and telephone of District contact person: Greg Pike 901 Ahlers Ave, Royal City, WA 9935...
Finding ref number: 2023-001 Finding caption: The District did not have adequate internal controls for ensuring compliance with allowable activities and costs and restricted purpose requirements. Name, address, and telephone of District contact person: Greg Pike 901 Ahlers Ave, Royal City, WA 99357 509-346-2222 Corrective action the auditee plans to take in response to the finding: The District is committed to implementing procedures that will ensure compliance with allowable activities as recommended by the State Auditor’s Office. The District was awarded ECF program funds on a one-time basis and has no plans to pursue such funding in the future. Nevertheless, the District will work with staff to align and implement specific procedures around the utilization of ECF program funds. Anticipated date to complete the corrective action: August 31, 2024
View Audit 306761 Questioned Costs: $1
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FOR FINDINGS REPORTED UNDER UNIFORM GUIDANCE Rochester School District No. 401 September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2023 This schedule presents the corrective action planned by the District for findings reported in this report in accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Re...
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FOR FINDINGS REPORTED UNDER UNIFORM GUIDANCE Rochester School District No. 401 September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2023 This schedule presents the corrective action planned by the District for findings reported in this report in accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Finding ref number: 2023-001 Finding caption: The District did not have adequate internal controls for ensuring compliance with allowable activities and costs, and restricted purpose requirements. Name, address, and telephone of District contact person: Jill Pratt, Business Manager 10140 Hwy 12 SW Rochester, WA 98579 360-273-5536 Corrective action the auditee plans to take in response to the finding: We do not concur with the finding because 1,898 students were identified as having “unmet need” and 1,000 Chromebooks were purchased with grant funds. However, in the future we will document our processes differently. The District did conduct a survey of families and identified 1,898 students were in need of a school issued device. This grant purchased 1,000 Chromebooks. Every student in Rochester received a district issued Chromebook. In our inventory process, we did not tie the newly purchased Chromebooks to students identified as having a need; however, all those in need received a district device. Even though we locally determined every student had a need in order to succeed at remote learning, moving forward, we will ensure the federally purchased devices are checked out specifically to those determined to have an “unmet need” based on the federal definition. Anticipated date to complete the corrective action: We will work with the FCC to resolve this issue according to their timeline.
View Audit 306754 Questioned Costs: $1
Response: The District concurs with this finding. District Management understands the importance of following approved policies and ensuring any incentive pay meets the approved guidelines within such policies.
Response: The District concurs with this finding. District Management understands the importance of following approved policies and ensuring any incentive pay meets the approved guidelines within such policies.
View Audit 306717 Questioned Costs: $1
The District will follow the recommendation of Arkansas Legislative Audit and contact the Arkansas Division of Elementary and Secondary Education for guidance regarding this matter and implement proper controls over program expenditures.
The District will follow the recommendation of Arkansas Legislative Audit and contact the Arkansas Division of Elementary and Secondary Education for guidance regarding this matter and implement proper controls over program expenditures.
View Audit 306717 Questioned Costs: $1
Corrective Action Taken: Corrective action has been implemented to ensure the District maintains proper controls over program expenditures. The Director of Federal Programs reviews and approves all
Corrective Action Taken: Corrective action has been implemented to ensure the District maintains proper controls over program expenditures. The Director of Federal Programs reviews and approves all
View Audit 306717 Questioned Costs: $1
Recommendation: Procedures for subrecipient monitoring to meet federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the awards should be developed and documented. Internal controls should be designed, implemented, and documented within the subrecipient monitoring procedures to ensure complianc...
Recommendation: Procedures for subrecipient monitoring to meet federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the awards should be developed and documented. Internal controls should be designed, implemented, and documented within the subrecipient monitoring procedures to ensure compliance with 2 CFR section 200.332. Subrecipient monitoring activities should be performed and documented. Ac􀆟on Taken: BGCDC is working on an updated policy and procedure manual that is conducive to Uniform Guidance. The addition of a Compliance Department will aid in adhering to the appropriate monitoring procedures regarding subawards. The contact persons responsible for this corrective action plan are Alan Branch, Sr VP of Compliance and Workforce Development, the new Compliance Director, Wendi Speed, CFO, and the entire Finance Team. The anticipated completion date is June 30, 2025.
View Audit 306700 Questioned Costs: $1
Recommendation: Internal controls over reporting should be designed, implemented, and documented to ensure compliance with 2 CFR section 200.302(b)(2), including who is responsible, what they are reviewing for, when reviews are to take place, and how documentation of the controls will be maintained....
Recommendation: Internal controls over reporting should be designed, implemented, and documented to ensure compliance with 2 CFR section 200.302(b)(2), including who is responsible, what they are reviewing for, when reviews are to take place, and how documentation of the controls will be maintained. The general ledger should be set up to properly capture and track expenses as well as budgets prepared and approved with the actual costs expected to be incurred. Reports should be reconciled to the general ledger. Budgets should be complete and include all line items and not just include all expenses under supplies. Ac􀆟on Taken: This is a project Finance team is currently working on. The new Compliance Director will manage the grant writing process. During the grant and award process, Compliance, the Program with award, and Finance will establish an appropriate budget which, in turn, will be reflected in general ledger and monitored by the team. The contact persons responsible for this corrective action plan are Alan Branch, Sr VP of Compliance and Workforce Development, the new Compliance Director, Wendi Speed, CFO, and the entire Finance Team. The anticipated completion date is June 30, 2025.
View Audit 306700 Questioned Costs: $1
Recommendation: The organization should develop and document procurement procedures that meet state, local, and Uniform Guidance requirements. The conflict-of-interest policy should be updated to include standards of conduct for those involved in procuring and to include organizational conflicts of ...
Recommendation: The organization should develop and document procurement procedures that meet state, local, and Uniform Guidance requirements. The conflict-of-interest policy should be updated to include standards of conduct for those involved in procuring and to include organizational conflicts of interest. Internal controls should be designed, implemented, and documented within the procurement procedures to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. At a minimum, the procurement history including rationale for the method, procurement method support, contract selections and rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices should be documented. Ac􀆟on Taken: BGCDC has already established a Uniform Guidance worthy procurement policy and is currently working on an update to the Conflict-of-Interest policy. These will go to our Finance Committee and Board soon for full approval as well as implementation. Leadership has been informed of this change and is already starting on the implementation as far as seeking out bids, documenting rationale, and making informed decisions. The contact person responsible for the corrective action is Wendi Speed, CFO. The anticipated completion date is June 30, 2025.
View Audit 306700 Questioned Costs: $1
Recommendation: Transactions should be recorded in accordance with GAAP with a review and approval for financial reporting as well as for compliance with allowability requirements. Training on cost principles per the Uniform Guidance should be provided to the finance department and program managers....
Recommendation: Transactions should be recorded in accordance with GAAP with a review and approval for financial reporting as well as for compliance with allowability requirements. Training on cost principles per the Uniform Guidance should be provided to the finance department and program managers. Ac􀆟on Taken: This transaction happened early on when the WIG grant was first awarded. Soon after, it was apparent this had been done incorrectly. The current Finance staff has attended a two-day Uniform Guidance training course and continues to read and review 2 CFR 200 regularly. If a transaction is in question, we reach out to auditors/consulting team. The corrective action planned is continual training on Uniform Guidance and the addition of a Compliance Director to our team. The contact person responsible for the corrective action is Wendi Speed, CFO. The anticipated completion date is June 30, 2025.
View Audit 306700 Questioned Costs: $1
Management agrees with the finding. Management has submitted the forms for HUD's approval.
Management agrees with the finding. Management has submitted the forms for HUD's approval.
View Audit 306645 Questioned Costs: $1
Sufficient Documentation for Noncompetitive Proposals for Pacific Fisheries Data Program, 11.437 Recommendation: CLA recommends increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correct...
Sufficient Documentation for Noncompetitive Proposals for Pacific Fisheries Data Program, 11.437 Recommendation: CLA recommends increased internal monitoring to ensure that noncompetitive procurements are sufficiently justified and that internal Sole Source Justification Forms are completed correctly and retained for all vendors procured under noncompetitive methods. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Commission will modify its subcontractor request form and PO form to require competitive supporting documents or non-competitive justification documents to be attached with the subcontractor request or PO form. Contract Specialist and Purchasing Specialist will review request package to ensure all required paperwork completed properly before moving forward with the process. In the pipe line, Requisition Module in Navision Software will be designed to put a hard stop if a purchase order of $10,000 or greater is missing supporting document for competitive/non-competitive procurements. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Kathy Ameral and Michael Arredondo. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: October 15, 2023
View Audit 306634 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 397866 (2023-001)
Material Weakness 2023
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (Concerning Audit Finding 2023-001) Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Lucie Tabor, Director of Finance Corrective Action: The Maine School Administrative District 27 will take the following actions to address finding 2023-001: As a Federal response to COVID-19,...
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (Concerning Audit Finding 2023-001) Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Lucie Tabor, Director of Finance Corrective Action: The Maine School Administrative District 27 will take the following actions to address finding 2023-001: As a Federal response to COVID-19, the Federal and State Governments provided grants to school districts to address the COVID-19 pandemic response for Schools. The CARES and ESSER Grants were initially distributed with a very short timeline on spending, initially by the end on December 2020, then subsequently extended to March 31 st and then extended beyond with additional Grants provided (ESSER I, 2 and ESSER ARP). This made for a very confusing and intense period to spend, track and coordinate spending and projects across three School Districts that the Valley Unified Education Service Center oversees. Also, the initial Grant that was provided to school Districts (CARES/ESSER I) were done so without clear directives from the Department of Education as to whether these were State Funds or Federal Funds . We were well under way with Committing and spending the funds before it was communicated that the initial funds were State funds (CARES), but subsequent ones were Federal Funds. By then, most of our projects were well under way and/or had been committed and we were now dealing with COVID-19 illnesses, remote school days, school shutdowns and delays/difficulties getting our products and contractors to pro vi de their services on the timeline we needed for the grants. These grants ran concurrently with one another and panned four Fiscal Years: 2020-21 , 2021-2022, 2022-2023 and 2023-2024. It is very rare that we have the opportunity to use Federal funds to address building or renovation projects for our school districts , so we have had no experience with the David Bacon prevailing wage requirement prior to these Federal fund , and therefore, this was not something on our radar at the time. Most of the Federal funding grants that we are used to (ESEA and Special Education) are spent on wages and purchases of materials and equipment, not projects of the scope that we were able to provide using ESSER Grant Funds. For any future projects requiring contractors, we will ensure that MSAD 27 provides the Davis Bacon requirement for prevailing wage rates including the information with the Request for Proposals or Bids (if applicable) and also with the contracts for the service once awarded. We will then ensure that the prevailing wage rates app licable to the contractor were paid to the workers (if applicable) prior to us paying the invoice to the contractor. Anticipated Compl etion Date: August 31 , 2024 to develop the policy and procedure for future Request for Propo als/ Bids that require the Davis Bacon prevailing wage rates.
View Audit 306609 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding: The Department of Social and Health Services did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with federal provider eligibility requirements for the Medicaid Program. Questioned Costs: Assistance Listing # 93.775 93.777 93.777 COVID-19 93.778 93.778 COVID-19 Amount $5...
Finding: The Department of Social and Health Services did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with federal provider eligibility requirements for the Medicaid Program. Questioned Costs: Assistance Listing # 93.775 93.777 93.777 COVID-19 93.778 93.778 COVID-19 Amount $576,072 Status: Corrective action in progress Corrective Action: The Department partially agrees with the finding. The Department agrees that the Medicaid Provider Disclosure Statement (MPDS) forms for the identified exceptions were not obtained within the five-year revalidation timeline due to the increased workload during the public health emergency. The Department does not agree all the exceptions should result in questioned costs. The Department is disputing the questioned costs related to one nursing home, totaling $231,810. Although the MPDS was not submitted within the five-year revalidation timeline, the Department determined there were no changes to ownership or managing employees since the previous MPDS form was received. As of March 2023, automated provider screenings are completed monthly for all providers as required. As of March 2024, the Department’s nursing home revalidation process was modified to provide guidance to staff when a nursing home does not provide the required MPDS during the 5-year revalidation period. The process includes procedures prior to termination of the contract to ensure resident safety and choice, as well as when to stop payment. By December 2024, the Department will consult with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) regarding the disagreement with the $231,810 of questioned costs. The Department will work with HHS regarding the remaining $344,262 of questioned costs and take additional action as appropriate. The conditions noted in this finding were previously reported in finding 2022-059. Completion Date: Estimated December 2024 Agency Contact: Richard Meyer External Audit Compliance Manager PO Box 45804 Olympia, WA 98504-5804 (360) 664-6027 Richard.Meyer@dshs.wa.gov
View Audit 306534 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding: The Health Care Authority improperly charged $3,491 to the Medicaid program. Questioned Costs: Assistance Listing # 93.778 93.778 COVID-19 Amount $3,491 Status: Corrective action not taken Corrective Action: The Authority partially concurs with the finding. The condition identi...
Finding: The Health Care Authority improperly charged $3,491 to the Medicaid program. Questioned Costs: Assistance Listing # 93.778 93.778 COVID-19 Amount $3,491 Status: Corrective action not taken Corrective Action: The Authority partially concurs with the finding. The condition identified by the auditors was the result of federal requirements in place during the COVID-19 public health emergency. The condition will be addressed by existing procedures during the unwinding process. No corrective action is necessary. In accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 1396b(u), questioned costs will not be repaid as they do not exceed the allowable error rate of three percent of total expenditures verified by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Payment Error Rate Measurement process. Completion Date: Not applicable Agency Contact: William Sogge, CPA, CIA External Audit Liaison PO Box 45502 Olympia, WA 98504-5502 (360) 725-5110 william.sogge@hca.wa.gov
View Audit 306534 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding: The Department of Children, Youth, and Families did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with requirements to ensure payments to child care providers for the Child Care and Development Fund Cluster programs were allowable and properly supported. Questioned Costs: ...
Finding: The Department of Children, Youth, and Families did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with requirements to ensure payments to child care providers for the Child Care and Development Fund Cluster programs were allowable and properly supported. Questioned Costs: Assistance Listing # 93.575 93.575 COVID-19 93.596 Amount 356,042,172 Status: Corrective action in progress Corrective Action: The Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) program was previously managed by the Department of Social and Health Services and the Department of Early Learning. Since the program transitioned in 2019, the Department has been making efforts to strengthen internal controls over payments to child care providers and other CCDF grant requirements. The Department implemented grant-level management of all federal funds, including the CCDF grant. The Department allocated the CCDF grant to eligible clients and allowable activities in compliance with 45 CFR 98.67. As part of the audit resolution process, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Administration for Children & Families (ACF), which oversees the CCDF program at the federal level, reviews all State Auditor’s Office (SAO) findings and issues management decision letters. The Department received a management decision letter dated October 3, 2023, from HHS for finding 2021-033 (2020-038) which states: “The ACF noted that the auditor raised concern about the Department’s accounting procedures and efforts made to trace expenditures at the transaction-level. As the basis for the finding, the auditor used CFRs (200.53, 200.303, 200.403, 200.410) that do not apply to CCDF. Federal regulations allow Lead Agencies to expend and account for CCDF funds in accordance with their own procedures.” In addition, ACF did not sustain the disallowance of questioned costs and stated: “Although the Department’s internal controls were lacking, the ACF has not identified any funds that were expended on ineligible activities.” The ACF recommended: “…that the Department work with the auditors to determine an appropriate methodology that can be tested to ensure child care payments comply with Federal regulations.” The Department met with ACF and SAO on November 8, 2023, to discuss the ACF decision at which time ACF upheld the above statements that the activities allowed finding was not substantiated. The Department is committed to collaborating with SAO to determine an appropriate methodology that identifies a sampling unit that can be used to accurately test compliance. The SAO maintained that the program is not auditable without child-level data. The Department does not currently have the staff and resources to develop and maintain the business process redesign, as well as the information technology initiatives necessary to meet the level of assurance recommended by SAO. In response to the auditor’s recommendations, the Department submitted a budget request for the 2024 supplemental budget. Funding was provided to develop and maintain the business process that would allow adjustments to include child-level data beginning July 2024. The conditions noted in this finding were previously reported in findings 2022-041, 2021-033, 2020-038, 2019-035, 2018-034, 2017-024, 2016-021, 2015-023, 2014-023, 2013-016, 12-28, 11-23, 10-31, 9-12 and 8-13. Completion Date: Estimated December 2025 Agency Contact: Stefanie Niemela Audit Liaison PO Box 40970 Olympia, WA 98504-0970 (360) 725-4402 stefanie.niemela@dcyf.wa.gov
View Audit 306534 Questioned Costs: $1
« 1 134 135 137 138 285 »