Federal Program Affected
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education
Pass-through Entity: California Department of Education
Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund (ESF)
ALN: 84.425D & 84.425U (FY 2022-2023)
Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency and Non-Compliance
Criteria or Specific Requirements
The Code of Federal Regulations, Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart E, Section
200.439(a)(1) states:
“Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as
direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or passthrough
entity.”
Furthermore, the California Department of Education’s (CDE) FAQs on Capital Expenditures state
the following:
“In accordance with 2 CFR 200.439, prior approval is required for any single big-ticket purchases
at the cost of $5,000 or more using the funding sources cited above. These purchases can
include general purpose equipment, buildings, and land, including material improvements. This
means one costly item (or several items which make up one unit) and the cost includes all the
ancillary expenses such as design costs, new electrical circuit for the item, and other related
fees.
To obtain approval, an LEA must fill out the Capital Expenditures Pre-Approval Application
Form”
Condition
The District had a total of $305,312 in capital expenditures charged to ESF that was not preapproved
by CDE.
Questioned Costs
A total of $305,312 in questioned costs were noted based on the condition identified.
Context
The condition was identified as a result of our review and testing of expenditures charged to
various ESF programs.
Effect
As a result of the condition identified, the District was not in compliance with the Code of
Federal Regulations, Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart E, Section 200.439(a)(1).
Cause
The cause appears to be attribute to the District’s improper monitoring and lack of knowledge
over this specific compliance requirement. Additionally, a contributing factor appears to be a
turnover in a key position that provides oversight for this program.
Repeat Finding
No.
Recommendation
The District should become familiar with all of the compliance requirements with ESF. As a
resource, the District should utilize a combination of guidance provided by CDE and also by
Subpart E of the Uniform Guidance that provides guidance on cost principles. Additionally, the
District should establish more effective control activities and monitoring over how Federal funds
are spent to ensure compliance, moving forward.
Federal Program Affected
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education
Pass-through Entity: California Department of Education
Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund (ESF)
ALN: 84.425D & 84.425U (FY 2022-2023)
Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency and Non-Compliance
Criteria or Specific Requirements
The Code of Federal Regulations, Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart E, Section
200.439(a)(1) states:
“Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as
direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or passthrough
entity.”
Furthermore, the California Department of Education’s (CDE) FAQs on Capital Expenditures state
the following:
“In accordance with 2 CFR 200.439, prior approval is required for any single big-ticket purchases
at the cost of $5,000 or more using the funding sources cited above. These purchases can
include general purpose equipment, buildings, and land, including material improvements. This
means one costly item (or several items which make up one unit) and the cost includes all the
ancillary expenses such as design costs, new electrical circuit for the item, and other related
fees.
To obtain approval, an LEA must fill out the Capital Expenditures Pre-Approval Application
Form”
Condition
The District had a total of $305,312 in capital expenditures charged to ESF that was not preapproved
by CDE.
Questioned Costs
A total of $305,312 in questioned costs were noted based on the condition identified.
Context
The condition was identified as a result of our review and testing of expenditures charged to
various ESF programs.
Effect
As a result of the condition identified, the District was not in compliance with the Code of
Federal Regulations, Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart E, Section 200.439(a)(1).
Cause
The cause appears to be attribute to the District’s improper monitoring and lack of knowledge
over this specific compliance requirement. Additionally, a contributing factor appears to be a
turnover in a key position that provides oversight for this program.
Repeat Finding
No.
Recommendation
The District should become familiar with all of the compliance requirements with ESF. As a
resource, the District should utilize a combination of guidance provided by CDE and also by
Subpart E of the Uniform Guidance that provides guidance on cost principles. Additionally, the
District should establish more effective control activities and monitoring over how Federal funds
are spent to ensure compliance, moving forward.
Federal Program Affected
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education
Pass-through Entity: California Department of Education
Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund (ESF)
ALN: 84.425D & 84.425U (FY 2022-2023)
Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency and Non-Compliance
Criteria or Specific Requirements
The Code of Federal Regulations, Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart E, Section
200.439(a)(1) states:
“Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as
direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or passthrough
entity.”
Furthermore, the California Department of Education’s (CDE) FAQs on Capital Expenditures state
the following:
“In accordance with 2 CFR 200.439, prior approval is required for any single big-ticket purchases
at the cost of $5,000 or more using the funding sources cited above. These purchases can
include general purpose equipment, buildings, and land, including material improvements. This
means one costly item (or several items which make up one unit) and the cost includes all the
ancillary expenses such as design costs, new electrical circuit for the item, and other related
fees.
To obtain approval, an LEA must fill out the Capital Expenditures Pre-Approval Application
Form”
Condition
The District had a total of $305,312 in capital expenditures charged to ESF that was not preapproved
by CDE.
Questioned Costs
A total of $305,312 in questioned costs were noted based on the condition identified.
Context
The condition was identified as a result of our review and testing of expenditures charged to
various ESF programs.
Effect
As a result of the condition identified, the District was not in compliance with the Code of
Federal Regulations, Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart E, Section 200.439(a)(1).
Cause
The cause appears to be attribute to the District’s improper monitoring and lack of knowledge
over this specific compliance requirement. Additionally, a contributing factor appears to be a
turnover in a key position that provides oversight for this program.
Repeat Finding
No.
Recommendation
The District should become familiar with all of the compliance requirements with ESF. As a
resource, the District should utilize a combination of guidance provided by CDE and also by
Subpart E of the Uniform Guidance that provides guidance on cost principles. Additionally, the
District should establish more effective control activities and monitoring over how Federal funds
are spent to ensure compliance, moving forward.
Federal Program Affected
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education
Pass-through Entity: California Department of Education
Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund (ESF)
ALN: 84.425D & 84.425U (FY 2022-2023)
Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency and Non-Compliance
Criteria or Specific Requirements
The Code of Federal Regulations, Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart E, Section
200.439(a)(1) states:
“Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as
direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or passthrough
entity.”
Furthermore, the California Department of Education’s (CDE) FAQs on Capital Expenditures state
the following:
“In accordance with 2 CFR 200.439, prior approval is required for any single big-ticket purchases
at the cost of $5,000 or more using the funding sources cited above. These purchases can
include general purpose equipment, buildings, and land, including material improvements. This
means one costly item (or several items which make up one unit) and the cost includes all the
ancillary expenses such as design costs, new electrical circuit for the item, and other related
fees.
To obtain approval, an LEA must fill out the Capital Expenditures Pre-Approval Application
Form”
Condition
The District had a total of $305,312 in capital expenditures charged to ESF that was not preapproved
by CDE.
Questioned Costs
A total of $305,312 in questioned costs were noted based on the condition identified.
Context
The condition was identified as a result of our review and testing of expenditures charged to
various ESF programs.
Effect
As a result of the condition identified, the District was not in compliance with the Code of
Federal Regulations, Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart E, Section 200.439(a)(1).
Cause
The cause appears to be attribute to the District’s improper monitoring and lack of knowledge
over this specific compliance requirement. Additionally, a contributing factor appears to be a
turnover in a key position that provides oversight for this program.
Repeat Finding
No.
Recommendation
The District should become familiar with all of the compliance requirements with ESF. As a
resource, the District should utilize a combination of guidance provided by CDE and also by
Subpart E of the Uniform Guidance that provides guidance on cost principles. Additionally, the
District should establish more effective control activities and monitoring over how Federal funds
are spent to ensure compliance, moving forward.
Federal Program Affected
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education
Pass-through Entity: California Department of Education
Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund (ESF)
ALN: 84.425D & 84.425U (FY 2022-2023)
Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency and Non-Compliance
Criteria or Specific Requirements
The Code of Federal Regulations, Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart E, Section
200.439(a)(1) states:
“Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as
direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or passthrough
entity.”
Furthermore, the California Department of Education’s (CDE) FAQs on Capital Expenditures state
the following:
“In accordance with 2 CFR 200.439, prior approval is required for any single big-ticket purchases
at the cost of $5,000 or more using the funding sources cited above. These purchases can
include general purpose equipment, buildings, and land, including material improvements. This
means one costly item (or several items which make up one unit) and the cost includes all the
ancillary expenses such as design costs, new electrical circuit for the item, and other related
fees.
To obtain approval, an LEA must fill out the Capital Expenditures Pre-Approval Application
Form”
Condition
The District had a total of $305,312 in capital expenditures charged to ESF that was not preapproved
by CDE.
Questioned Costs
A total of $305,312 in questioned costs were noted based on the condition identified.
Context
The condition was identified as a result of our review and testing of expenditures charged to
various ESF programs.
Effect
As a result of the condition identified, the District was not in compliance with the Code of
Federal Regulations, Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart E, Section 200.439(a)(1).
Cause
The cause appears to be attribute to the District’s improper monitoring and lack of knowledge
over this specific compliance requirement. Additionally, a contributing factor appears to be a
turnover in a key position that provides oversight for this program.
Repeat Finding
No.
Recommendation
The District should become familiar with all of the compliance requirements with ESF. As a
resource, the District should utilize a combination of guidance provided by CDE and also by
Subpart E of the Uniform Guidance that provides guidance on cost principles. Additionally, the
District should establish more effective control activities and monitoring over how Federal funds
are spent to ensure compliance, moving forward.
Federal Program Affected
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education
Pass-through Entity: California Department of Education
Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund (ESF)
ALN: 84.425D & 84.425U (FY 2022-2023)
Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency and Non-Compliance
Criteria or Specific Requirements
The Code of Federal Regulations, Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart E, Section
200.439(a)(1) states:
“Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as
direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or passthrough
entity.”
Furthermore, the California Department of Education’s (CDE) FAQs on Capital Expenditures state
the following:
“In accordance with 2 CFR 200.439, prior approval is required for any single big-ticket purchases
at the cost of $5,000 or more using the funding sources cited above. These purchases can
include general purpose equipment, buildings, and land, including material improvements. This
means one costly item (or several items which make up one unit) and the cost includes all the
ancillary expenses such as design costs, new electrical circuit for the item, and other related
fees.
To obtain approval, an LEA must fill out the Capital Expenditures Pre-Approval Application
Form”
Condition
The District had a total of $305,312 in capital expenditures charged to ESF that was not preapproved
by CDE.
Questioned Costs
A total of $305,312 in questioned costs were noted based on the condition identified.
Context
The condition was identified as a result of our review and testing of expenditures charged to
various ESF programs.
Effect
As a result of the condition identified, the District was not in compliance with the Code of
Federal Regulations, Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart E, Section 200.439(a)(1).
Cause
The cause appears to be attribute to the District’s improper monitoring and lack of knowledge
over this specific compliance requirement. Additionally, a contributing factor appears to be a
turnover in a key position that provides oversight for this program.
Repeat Finding
No.
Recommendation
The District should become familiar with all of the compliance requirements with ESF. As a
resource, the District should utilize a combination of guidance provided by CDE and also by
Subpart E of the Uniform Guidance that provides guidance on cost principles. Additionally, the
District should establish more effective control activities and monitoring over how Federal funds
are spent to ensure compliance, moving forward.
Federal Program Affected
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education
Pass-through Entity: California Department of Education
Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund (ESF)
ALN: 84.425D & 84.425U (FY 2022-2023)
Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency and Non-Compliance
Criteria or Specific Requirements
The Code of Federal Regulations, Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart E, Section
200.439(a)(1) states:
“Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as
direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or passthrough
entity.”
Furthermore, the California Department of Education’s (CDE) FAQs on Capital Expenditures state
the following:
“In accordance with 2 CFR 200.439, prior approval is required for any single big-ticket purchases
at the cost of $5,000 or more using the funding sources cited above. These purchases can
include general purpose equipment, buildings, and land, including material improvements. This
means one costly item (or several items which make up one unit) and the cost includes all the
ancillary expenses such as design costs, new electrical circuit for the item, and other related
fees.
To obtain approval, an LEA must fill out the Capital Expenditures Pre-Approval Application
Form”
Condition
The District had a total of $305,312 in capital expenditures charged to ESF that was not preapproved
by CDE.
Questioned Costs
A total of $305,312 in questioned costs were noted based on the condition identified.
Context
The condition was identified as a result of our review and testing of expenditures charged to
various ESF programs.
Effect
As a result of the condition identified, the District was not in compliance with the Code of
Federal Regulations, Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart E, Section 200.439(a)(1).
Cause
The cause appears to be attribute to the District’s improper monitoring and lack of knowledge
over this specific compliance requirement. Additionally, a contributing factor appears to be a
turnover in a key position that provides oversight for this program.
Repeat Finding
No.
Recommendation
The District should become familiar with all of the compliance requirements with ESF. As a
resource, the District should utilize a combination of guidance provided by CDE and also by
Subpart E of the Uniform Guidance that provides guidance on cost principles. Additionally, the
District should establish more effective control activities and monitoring over how Federal funds
are spent to ensure compliance, moving forward.
Federal Program Affected
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education
Pass-through Entity: California Department of Education
Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund (ESF)
ALN: 84.425D & 84.425U (FY 2022-2023)
Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency and Non-Compliance
Criteria or Specific Requirements
The Code of Federal Regulations, Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart E, Section
200.439(a)(1) states:
“Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as
direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or passthrough
entity.”
Furthermore, the California Department of Education’s (CDE) FAQs on Capital Expenditures state
the following:
“In accordance with 2 CFR 200.439, prior approval is required for any single big-ticket purchases
at the cost of $5,000 or more using the funding sources cited above. These purchases can
include general purpose equipment, buildings, and land, including material improvements. This
means one costly item (or several items which make up one unit) and the cost includes all the
ancillary expenses such as design costs, new electrical circuit for the item, and other related
fees.
To obtain approval, an LEA must fill out the Capital Expenditures Pre-Approval Application
Form”
Condition
The District had a total of $305,312 in capital expenditures charged to ESF that was not preapproved
by CDE.
Questioned Costs
A total of $305,312 in questioned costs were noted based on the condition identified.
Context
The condition was identified as a result of our review and testing of expenditures charged to
various ESF programs.
Effect
As a result of the condition identified, the District was not in compliance with the Code of
Federal Regulations, Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart E, Section 200.439(a)(1).
Cause
The cause appears to be attribute to the District’s improper monitoring and lack of knowledge
over this specific compliance requirement. Additionally, a contributing factor appears to be a
turnover in a key position that provides oversight for this program.
Repeat Finding
No.
Recommendation
The District should become familiar with all of the compliance requirements with ESF. As a
resource, the District should utilize a combination of guidance provided by CDE and also by
Subpart E of the Uniform Guidance that provides guidance on cost principles. Additionally, the
District should establish more effective control activities and monitoring over how Federal funds
are spent to ensure compliance, moving forward.
Federal Program Affected
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education
Pass-through Entity: California Department of Education
Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund (ESF)
ALN: 84.425D & 84.425U (FY 2022-2023)
Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency and Non-Compliance
Criteria or Specific Requirements
The Code of Federal Regulations, Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart E, Section
200.439(a)(1) states:
“Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as
direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or passthrough
entity.”
Furthermore, the California Department of Education’s (CDE) FAQs on Capital Expenditures state
the following:
“In accordance with 2 CFR 200.439, prior approval is required for any single big-ticket purchases
at the cost of $5,000 or more using the funding sources cited above. These purchases can
include general purpose equipment, buildings, and land, including material improvements. This
means one costly item (or several items which make up one unit) and the cost includes all the
ancillary expenses such as design costs, new electrical circuit for the item, and other related
fees.
To obtain approval, an LEA must fill out the Capital Expenditures Pre-Approval Application
Form”
Condition
The District had a total of $305,312 in capital expenditures charged to ESF that was not preapproved
by CDE.
Questioned Costs
A total of $305,312 in questioned costs were noted based on the condition identified.
Context
The condition was identified as a result of our review and testing of expenditures charged to
various ESF programs.
Effect
As a result of the condition identified, the District was not in compliance with the Code of
Federal Regulations, Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart E, Section 200.439(a)(1).
Cause
The cause appears to be attribute to the District’s improper monitoring and lack of knowledge
over this specific compliance requirement. Additionally, a contributing factor appears to be a
turnover in a key position that provides oversight for this program.
Repeat Finding
No.
Recommendation
The District should become familiar with all of the compliance requirements with ESF. As a
resource, the District should utilize a combination of guidance provided by CDE and also by
Subpart E of the Uniform Guidance that provides guidance on cost principles. Additionally, the
District should establish more effective control activities and monitoring over how Federal funds
are spent to ensure compliance, moving forward.
Federal Program Affected
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education
Pass-through Entity: California Department of Education
Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund (ESF)
ALN: 84.425D & 84.425U (FY 2022-2023)
Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency and Non-Compliance
Criteria or Specific Requirements
The Code of Federal Regulations, Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart E, Section
200.439(a)(1) states:
“Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as
direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or passthrough
entity.”
Furthermore, the California Department of Education’s (CDE) FAQs on Capital Expenditures state
the following:
“In accordance with 2 CFR 200.439, prior approval is required for any single big-ticket purchases
at the cost of $5,000 or more using the funding sources cited above. These purchases can
include general purpose equipment, buildings, and land, including material improvements. This
means one costly item (or several items which make up one unit) and the cost includes all the
ancillary expenses such as design costs, new electrical circuit for the item, and other related
fees.
To obtain approval, an LEA must fill out the Capital Expenditures Pre-Approval Application
Form”
Condition
The District had a total of $305,312 in capital expenditures charged to ESF that was not preapproved
by CDE.
Questioned Costs
A total of $305,312 in questioned costs were noted based on the condition identified.
Context
The condition was identified as a result of our review and testing of expenditures charged to
various ESF programs.
Effect
As a result of the condition identified, the District was not in compliance with the Code of
Federal Regulations, Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart E, Section 200.439(a)(1).
Cause
The cause appears to be attribute to the District’s improper monitoring and lack of knowledge
over this specific compliance requirement. Additionally, a contributing factor appears to be a
turnover in a key position that provides oversight for this program.
Repeat Finding
No.
Recommendation
The District should become familiar with all of the compliance requirements with ESF. As a
resource, the District should utilize a combination of guidance provided by CDE and also by
Subpart E of the Uniform Guidance that provides guidance on cost principles. Additionally, the
District should establish more effective control activities and monitoring over how Federal funds
are spent to ensure compliance, moving forward.
Federal Program Affected
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education
Pass-through Entity: California Department of Education
Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund (ESF)
ALN: 84.425D & 84.425U (FY 2022-2023)
Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency and Non-Compliance
Criteria or Specific Requirements
The Code of Federal Regulations, Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart E, Section
200.439(a)(1) states:
“Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as
direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or passthrough
entity.”
Furthermore, the California Department of Education’s (CDE) FAQs on Capital Expenditures state
the following:
“In accordance with 2 CFR 200.439, prior approval is required for any single big-ticket purchases
at the cost of $5,000 or more using the funding sources cited above. These purchases can
include general purpose equipment, buildings, and land, including material improvements. This
means one costly item (or several items which make up one unit) and the cost includes all the
ancillary expenses such as design costs, new electrical circuit for the item, and other related
fees.
To obtain approval, an LEA must fill out the Capital Expenditures Pre-Approval Application
Form”
Condition
The District had a total of $305,312 in capital expenditures charged to ESF that was not preapproved
by CDE.
Questioned Costs
A total of $305,312 in questioned costs were noted based on the condition identified.
Context
The condition was identified as a result of our review and testing of expenditures charged to
various ESF programs.
Effect
As a result of the condition identified, the District was not in compliance with the Code of
Federal Regulations, Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart E, Section 200.439(a)(1).
Cause
The cause appears to be attribute to the District’s improper monitoring and lack of knowledge
over this specific compliance requirement. Additionally, a contributing factor appears to be a
turnover in a key position that provides oversight for this program.
Repeat Finding
No.
Recommendation
The District should become familiar with all of the compliance requirements with ESF. As a
resource, the District should utilize a combination of guidance provided by CDE and also by
Subpart E of the Uniform Guidance that provides guidance on cost principles. Additionally, the
District should establish more effective control activities and monitoring over how Federal funds
are spent to ensure compliance, moving forward.
Federal Program Affected
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education
Pass-through Entity: California Department of Education
Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund (ESF)
ALN: 84.425D & 84.425U (FY 2022-2023)
Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency and Non-Compliance
Criteria or Specific Requirements
The Code of Federal Regulations, Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart E, Section
200.439(a)(1) states:
“Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and land are unallowable as
direct charges, except with the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or passthrough
entity.”
Furthermore, the California Department of Education’s (CDE) FAQs on Capital Expenditures state
the following:
“In accordance with 2 CFR 200.439, prior approval is required for any single big-ticket purchases
at the cost of $5,000 or more using the funding sources cited above. These purchases can
include general purpose equipment, buildings, and land, including material improvements. This
means one costly item (or several items which make up one unit) and the cost includes all the
ancillary expenses such as design costs, new electrical circuit for the item, and other related
fees.
To obtain approval, an LEA must fill out the Capital Expenditures Pre-Approval Application
Form”
Condition
The District had a total of $305,312 in capital expenditures charged to ESF that was not preapproved
by CDE.
Questioned Costs
A total of $305,312 in questioned costs were noted based on the condition identified.
Context
The condition was identified as a result of our review and testing of expenditures charged to
various ESF programs.
Effect
As a result of the condition identified, the District was not in compliance with the Code of
Federal Regulations, Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart E, Section 200.439(a)(1).
Cause
The cause appears to be attribute to the District’s improper monitoring and lack of knowledge
over this specific compliance requirement. Additionally, a contributing factor appears to be a
turnover in a key position that provides oversight for this program.
Repeat Finding
No.
Recommendation
The District should become familiar with all of the compliance requirements with ESF. As a
resource, the District should utilize a combination of guidance provided by CDE and also by
Subpart E of the Uniform Guidance that provides guidance on cost principles. Additionally, the
District should establish more effective control activities and monitoring over how Federal funds
are spent to ensure compliance, moving forward.