Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
59,889
In database
Filtered Results
7,014
Matching current filters
Showing Page
31 of 281
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: Material Weakness
Type: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Corrective Actions: - Implement reconciliation of each drawdown to actual expenditures. - Require detailed supporting documentation. - Establish supervisory approval process. Responsible Parties: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial ...
Type: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Corrective Actions: - Implement reconciliation of each drawdown to actual expenditures. - Require detailed supporting documentation. - Establish supervisory approval process. Responsible Parties: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action While the Organization understood the prior year finding (2023-006) and current year renumbered recommendation (2024-006), the Organization notes the corrective actions that have been implemented, The Organization notes the following exist...
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action While the Organization understood the prior year finding (2023-006) and current year renumbered recommendation (2024-006), the Organization notes the corrective actions that have been implemented, The Organization notes the following existing internal control practices, as it relates to cash management subsequent policy and process development and implementation, and the additional controls to be implemented: A. System, Process & Review Controls In Practice. 1. System Controls. The Organization operates in an environment in which system, process & review controls of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) are practiced in processing cash (draw) transactions in both the Electronic Handbook (EHB) and Payment Management System (PMS) systems, operated by HHS. Only the director of administrative operations and the CEO have system access to the EHB and PMS systems. 2. Process & Review Controls – EHB & PMS. Cash management requests (aka federal draws) are computed by, and entered into the EHB, including the Organization’s justification of the expenditure, by the director of administrative operations, including the CEO on the approval request. The propriety of the cash draw is reviewed by the HHS assigned grants management specialist; and inquiry action, if needed, documented by e-mail from the grants management specialist; and approval documented in the EHB. Once the draw is approved, the director of administrative operations enters information into the PMS, noting that the CEO, is the authorized organization representative (AOR). The grants management specialist must then approve the draw request once more in the PMS system before a PMS representative approves the draw request. 3. Process & Review Controls – Finance Committee & Full Board. The Organization’s monthly Board process and review controls include review of the Organization’s: Statement of Financial Position, Statement of Revenues and Expenditures, Statement of Revenues and Expenditures – Net Income/(Loss) by Fund, Fund Details – Additional Information and Statistics, Active Subcontract Summary, Active Subcontract Listing Related to Funds – Additional Information and Statistics, Native Hawaiian Health Program (Fund 007V), and Native Hawaiian Health Scholarship Program (Fund 017V). B. Internal Control Environment Policy Establishment – July 2025. In July 2025, the Organization developed the following cash management related policies and related procedures: Internal Control Environment; Implementation of Significant Accounting Policies; Revenue Recognition Policy, Including Federal Draws; Implementation of Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) Related Policies, including cash management processes and procedures. C. Additional Process & Review Controls – March 2026. Beginning March 2026, for federal draws, process and review internal controls will be implemented, via the chief of staff’s review of the director of administrative operations cash management analyses, federal grant receivable composition, reconciliation and related federal grant revenue computations, prior to any director of administrative operations and chief executive officer action in EHB and PMS, respectively. The current practices of the Organization, to the present period of the report dated June 17, 2026, is consistent with such developed policies.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action The Organization understands the criteria cited re: Title 2, Subtitle A Chapter II, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), §200.334, requiring “Fina...
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action The Organization understands the criteria cited re: Title 2, Subtitle A Chapter II, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), §200.334, requiring “Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal records must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report…”, and recommendation made. The Organization further refers to the corrective action plan of Finding No. 2024-002: Subrecipient Monitoring, which describes the Organization’s implemented changes re: Subrecipient Monitoring and Management, Retroactive Subrecipient Portfolio Risk Assessment and Correction(s), and Subrecipient Policies and Procedures. Contractor Performance Collection and Substantiation – November 2024 The Organization has incorporated specific review procedures to ensure the timely collection and substantiation of contractor performance deliverables (e.g., products, goods, services, activities, reports), consistent with the terms and conditions of the contract. The current practices of the Organization, from the above date, to the present period of the report dated June 17, 2026, is consistent with such developed procedures.
Federal Agency Name: Department of Agriculture Assistance Listing Number: 10.766 Program Name: Community Facilities Loans and Grants Finding Summary: The Hospital did not have an adequate internal control policy in place to ensure the proper disbursement and funding of the reserve account. Although ...
Federal Agency Name: Department of Agriculture Assistance Listing Number: 10.766 Program Name: Community Facilities Loans and Grants Finding Summary: The Hospital did not have an adequate internal control policy in place to ensure the proper disbursement and funding of the reserve account. Although management obtained a waiver for the noncompliance, the lack of adequate policies governing proper funding of reserve increases the risk that employees participating in the federal award administration may not be able to detect and correct noncompliance in a timely manner. Corrective Action Plan: Management will review and enhance internal control policies to ensure that there is proper funding of the reserve accounts. Responsible Individuals: Jody Nelson, CEO and Megan Peterson, CFO
The Boys and Girls Clubs of Southcentral Alaska has contracted with a national accounting firm, Fohrman and Fohrman, to reconcile the 2025 books and implement a simpler accounting structure. There will still be significant findings in 2025 as the organization ultimately closed due to financial insta...
The Boys and Girls Clubs of Southcentral Alaska has contracted with a national accounting firm, Fohrman and Fohrman, to reconcile the 2025 books and implement a simpler accounting structure. There will still be significant findings in 2025 as the organization ultimately closed due to financial instability. The new system will be implemented in 2026. Fohrman and Fohrman will continue on contract to ensure adequate financial reporting and reporting to the Board.
Cost Allocation Recommendation: The Alliance must document its allocation methodology and retain support for allocation calculations, including any exceptions to the established policy. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in r...
Cost Allocation Recommendation: The Alliance must document its allocation methodology and retain support for allocation calculations, including any exceptions to the established policy. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Alliance documented the ARPA designated hours per employee and made adjustments where needed to allocate money away from ARPA funds when those were not reported. This process will be documented and all data and calculations supporting the allocations will be retained. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Lisa Wolf Planned completion date for corrective action plan: July 1st 2026
Management's Response: AMHE Tenant Occupancy Specialist's will review and adhere to AMHE's Admission and Eligibility Program Management and Occupancy Master Requirements and will attend training courses that will help strengthen their eligibility policy and procedures. Estimated Completion Date: Imm...
Management's Response: AMHE Tenant Occupancy Specialist's will review and adhere to AMHE's Admission and Eligibility Program Management and Occupancy Master Requirements and will attend training courses that will help strengthen their eligibility policy and procedures. Estimated Completion Date: Immediately Interim Director will review the Admission and Eligibility Program Management and Occupancy requirements per AMHE's policy and procedures. This will be addressed with AMHE staff prior to 6/30/26. Responsible Party: Comptroller and Interim Director.
Management's Response: AMHE has established policies and procedures for the creation, approval, submission and retention of all required reports. On September 27, 2018 AMHE updated and adopted the Financial Management Policy and Procedures. Page 6, Section 8, Financial Reports states: "The TDHE must...
Management's Response: AMHE has established policies and procedures for the creation, approval, submission and retention of all required reports. On September 27, 2018 AMHE updated and adopted the Financial Management Policy and Procedures. Page 6, Section 8, Financial Reports states: "The TDHE must be able to produce accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each of the financially assisted activities made in accordance with the financial reporting requirements of the grant or sub-grant. The TONE shall use the financial reports as tools to manage, control, ensure compliance, monitor, and inform the TDHE on its financial activities. Reports to Grant Agencies: The TDHE shall complete and submit all reports to Federal, State, and local grant agencies in accordance with, and in the format and timelines required by the agency. The Executive Director will oversee all administrative and financial reports, including the HUD Standard Form 425, the INP and the APR, before the due dates designated by HUD, as such forms and deadlines may change from time to time." AMHE will do better in adhering to our Financial Management Policy and Procedures moving forward and getting the reports submitted in a timely manner. Estimated Completion Date: Immediately AMHE will adhere to the practice of the Financial Reporting of the Financial Management Policy and Procedures. This will be addressed with AMHE staff prior to 6/30/26. Responsible Party: Comptroller and Interim Director.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN: Management will strengthen internal controls over financial reporting by implementing a formal financial close and reporting process to ensure all required journal entries are identified, reviewed, approved, and recorded on a timely basis. Planned Actions Develop a Formal Clo...
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN: Management will strengthen internal controls over financial reporting by implementing a formal financial close and reporting process to ensure all required journal entries are identified, reviewed, approved, and recorded on a timely basis. Planned Actions Develop a Formal Close Checklist Implement a detailed month-end and year-end close checklist that identifies all key accounting procedures, reconciliations, and required journal entries. Assign responsibility and due dates for each task. Enhance Journal Entry Controls Require all significant manual journal entries to be supported by appropriate documentation and reviewed and approved by the Finance Director before posting. Maintain a journal entry log to monitor preparation, approval, and posting status. Management Review and Certification The Finance Director will certify completion of all close procedures and confirm that the consolidated trial balance agrees to the financial statements prior to issuance
The City will establish procedures whereby the Clerk and Manager will prepare the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) at each fiscal year end.
The City will establish procedures whereby the Clerk and Manager will prepare the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) at each fiscal year end.
The City will review the requirements for written policies and will adopt policies, as needed, or will revise its current policies as needed to comply with Uniform Guidance.
The City will review the requirements for written policies and will adopt policies, as needed, or will revise its current policies as needed to comply with Uniform Guidance.
Finding Number: 2024-011 Planned Corrective Action: The district will strengthen procedures for preparing and reviewing Final Expenditure Reports to ensure all reported expenditures agree to the underlying accounting records and supporting documentation. The Treasurer will reconcile grant expenditur...
Finding Number: 2024-011 Planned Corrective Action: The district will strengthen procedures for preparing and reviewing Final Expenditure Reports to ensure all reported expenditures agree to the underlying accounting records and supporting documentation. The Treasurer will reconcile grant expenditures to system reports prior to submission and implement additional review procedures to ensure accurate and compliant federal reporting. Anticipated Completion Date: 05/31/2026 Responsible Contact Person: Ashley Miller
Finding 2024 – 101 – Annual Recertification of Income Not Performed, Documentation of Eligibility (Material Weakness, Material Noncompliance) Federal program information: Funding agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Title: Supportive Housing for people with disabilities Assistanc...
Finding 2024 – 101 – Annual Recertification of Income Not Performed, Documentation of Eligibility (Material Weakness, Material Noncompliance) Federal program information: Funding agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Title: Supportive Housing for people with disabilities Assistance Listing Number: 14.181 Award year: 2023/2024 Award numbers: Project 123-HD042; AZ20Q081002 Pass-Through grantors: N/A Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Questioned Costs: Unknown Contact Name: Joe Keeper, Chief Financial Officer of the Sponsor Corrective Action Planned: 1. Complete all missed annual recertifications immediately. • Method: The property manager shall immediately Identify every tenant file where an annual income recertification was not performed. Collect and verify all required documentation from the affected tenants, using third-party verification as the preferred method. • Responsible Party: Property Manager. 2. Document all eligibility factors and discrepancies. • Method: For every affected tenant file, thoroughly document the process of verifying income, assets, and eligibility. Include explanations for any missing third-party verifications and document all follow-up attempts. • Responsible Party: Property Manager. 3. Retransmit corrected HUD Form 50059 filings to the TRACS system. • Method: Submit corrections for each tenant with a file deficiency by using the "Correction/Retransmittal" (R) code on a new Form HUD-50059A. • Responsible Party: Property Manager. 4. Address any rent-related issues arising from the missing recertifications. • Method: Calculate any potential back-rent owed by tenants due to misreporting or changes in income. Based on HUD guidelines and property policy, negotiate repayment plans if necessary, but carefully follow guidance regarding tenant culpability. • Responsible Party: Property Manager. 5. Revise and formalize resident file management policies and procedures. • Method: Update internal policy and procedural documents to establish clear, step-by-step instructions for completing annual recertifications, including all documentation requirements. Incorporate a standardized checklist for each tenant file to ensure consistent application. • Responsible Party: Controller and Property Manager. 6. Implement an improved tickler and tracking system. • Method: Use property management software to automatically generate alerts and reports for upcoming recertification deadlines. Implement a double-check process where a supervisor reviews and signs off on the list of upcoming deadlines each month to ensure no file is missed. • Responsible Party: Property Manager. 7. Provide comprehensive training for all staff involved in recertifications. • Method: Conduct mandatory training for all staff on Section 811 program requirements, focusing specifically on annual income recertifications and acceptable documentation. Include regular refresher training and create a central, accessible library of HUD guidance. • Responsible Party: Third Party Training Professionals, HUD and Property Manager’s compliance officer. 8. Establish a quality control review process. • Method: Implement a desk review process where a senior staff member or third-party consultant periodically audits a sample of completed recertification files. This internal monitoring should check for accuracy, completeness, and proper documentation. • Responsible Party: Property Manager. 9. Develop a monthly compliance monitoring report. • Method: The report will summarize the status of all recertifications for the month, listing upcoming deadlines and noting any files that required a correction. This will be presented to senior management. • Responsible Party: Property Manager. 10. Conduct a follow-up review. • Method: Engage an external auditor or consultant to perform a follow-up review of recertification files after the first year of the new procedures. This independent assessment will verify that the corrective actions are working effectively. • Responsible Party: Senior Management. 11. Provide status reports to HUD. • Method: As per the notice of noncompliance, submit regular reports to the relevant HUD Hub or Program Center detailing the progress on the CAP and any specific items requested. • Responsible Party: Property Manager and Chief Financial Officer of Sponsor. Anticipated Completion Date: December 2025
Finding 2024 – 101 – Annual Recertification of Income Not Performed, Documentation of Eligibility (Material Weakness, Material Noncompliance) Federal program information: Funding agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Title: Supportive Housing for people with disabilities Assistanc...
Finding 2024 – 101 – Annual Recertification of Income Not Performed, Documentation of Eligibility (Material Weakness, Material Noncompliance) Federal program information: Funding agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Title: Supportive Housing for people with disabilities Assistance Listing Number: 14.181 Award year: 2023/2024 Award numbers: Project 123-HD046; AZ20Q09100 Pass-Through grantors: N/A Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Questioned Costs: Unknown Contact Name: Joe Keeper, Chief Financial Officer of the Sponsor Corrective Action Planned: 1. Complete all missed annual recertifications immediately. • Method: The property manager shall immediately Identify every tenant file where an annual income recertification was not performed. Collect and verify all required documentation from the affected tenants, using third-party verification as the preferred method. • Responsible Party: Property Manager. 2. Document all eligibility factors and discrepancies. • Method: For every affected tenant file, thoroughly document the process of verifying income, assets, and eligibility. Include explanations for any missing third-party verifications and document all follow-up attempts. • Responsible Party: Property Manager. 3. Retransmit corrected HUD Form 50059 filings to the TRACS system. • Method: Submit corrections for each tenant with a file deficiency by using the "Correction/Retransmittal" (R) code on a new Form HUD-50059A. • Responsible Party: Property Manager. 4. Address any rent-related issues arising from the missing recertifications. • Method: Calculate any potential back-rent owed by tenants due to misreporting or changes in income. Based on HUD guidelines and property policy, negotiate repayment plans if necessary, but carefully follow guidance regarding tenant culpability. • Responsible Party: Property Manager. 5. Revise and formalize resident file management policies and procedures. • Method: Update internal policy and procedural documents to establish clear, step-by-step instructions for completing annual recertifications, including all documentation requirements. Incorporate a standardized checklist for each tenant file to ensure consistent application. • Responsible Party: Controller and Property Manager. 6. Implement an improved tickler and tracking system. • Method: Use property management software to automatically generate alerts and reports for upcoming recertification deadlines. Implement a double-check process where a supervisor reviews and signs off on the list of upcoming deadlines each month to ensure no file is missed. • Responsible Party: Property Manager. 7. Provide comprehensive training for all staff involved in recertifications. • Method: Conduct mandatory training for all staff on Section 811 program requirements, focusing specifically on annual income recertifications and acceptable documentation. Include regular refresher training and create a central, accessible library of HUD guidance. • Responsible Party: Third Party Training Professionals, HUD and Property Manager’s compliance officer. 8. Establish a quality control review process. • Method: Implement a desk review process where a senior staff member or third-party consultant periodically audits a sample of completed recertification files. This internal monitoring should check for accuracy, completeness, and proper documentation. • Responsible Party: Property Manager. 9. Develop a monthly compliance monitoring report. • Method: The report will summarize the status of all recertifications for the month, listing upcoming deadlines and noting any files that required a correction. This will be presented to senior management. • Responsible Party: Property Manager. 10. Conduct a follow-up review. • Method: Engage an external auditor or consultant to perform a follow-up review of recertification files after the first year of the new procedures. This independent assessment will verify that the corrective actions are working effectively. • Responsible Party: Senior Management. 11. Provide status reports to HUD. • Method: As per the notice of noncompliance, submit regular reports to the relevant HUD Hub or Program Center detailing the progress on the CAP and any specific items requested. • Responsible Party: Property Manager and Chief Financial Officer of Sponsor. Anticipated Completion Date: December 2025
2024-010 Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) Compliance Planned Corrective Action: We will review items not fully implemented. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Lori Larsh, Vice President for Business Services Anticipated Date of Completion: 07/31/2026
2024-010 Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) Compliance Planned Corrective Action: We will review items not fully implemented. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Lori Larsh, Vice President for Business Services Anticipated Date of Completion: 07/31/2026
Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) Reporting and Reconciliations Planned Corrective Action: Procedures will be implemented to monthly reconcile FDL and Pell disbursements to student accounts with disbursements reported to COD. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Lori Larsh, Vice Pr...
Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) Reporting and Reconciliations Planned Corrective Action: Procedures will be implemented to monthly reconcile FDL and Pell disbursements to student accounts with disbursements reported to COD. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Lori Larsh, Vice President for Business Services Anticipated Date of Completion: 07/31/2026
Need Analysis Planned Corrective Action: All scholarships will be marked as estimated financial assistance and an awarding check for need will be done accurately before final distribution. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Lori Larsh, Vice President for Business Services Anticipated Dat...
Need Analysis Planned Corrective Action: All scholarships will be marked as estimated financial assistance and an awarding check for need will be done accurately before final distribution. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Lori Larsh, Vice President for Business Services Anticipated Date of Completion: 07/31/2026
Satisfactory Academic Progress Planned Corrective Action: The SAP policy will be reviewed or created as needed and a procedure will be implemented based on that policy. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Lori Larsh, Vice President for Business Services Anticipated Date of Completion: 07/...
Satisfactory Academic Progress Planned Corrective Action: The SAP policy will be reviewed or created as needed and a procedure will be implemented based on that policy. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Lori Larsh, Vice President for Business Services Anticipated Date of Completion: 07/31/2026
Lack of Administrative Capability Planned Corrective Action: The financial aid officer will participate in training(s) specific to knowledge gaps. In addition, monthly entries will be made in the general ledger for financial aid activity and monthly balances will be reconciled between the general le...
Lack of Administrative Capability Planned Corrective Action: The financial aid officer will participate in training(s) specific to knowledge gaps. In addition, monthly entries will be made in the general ledger for financial aid activity and monthly balances will be reconciled between the general ledger and financial aid software. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Lori Larsh, Vice President for Business Services Anticipated Date of Completion: 07/31/2026
The District acknowledges the material correction of an error to the District’s financial statements. This situation occurred due to a material weakness in internal controls over compliance with federal award requirements for the Education Stabilization Fund (CFDA 84.425U), passed through the Colora...
The District acknowledges the material correction of an error to the District’s financial statements. This situation occurred due to a material weakness in internal controls over compliance with federal award requirements for the Education Stabilization Fund (CFDA 84.425U), passed through the Colorado Department of Education, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. Specifically, the District lacked adequate segregation of duties over payroll and human resources processes, both of which were performed by a single employee without a secondary review. In addition, the District did not maintain adequate reimbursement request documentation or regularly reconcile ESSER grant expenditures to reimbursement requests, as required under 2 CFR 200.303. These conditions resulted in material audit 60 adjustments, significant audit delays, and the engagement of a third-party accounting firm to reconstruct grant records. Notwithstanding these control deficiencies, the District was in compliance with allowable activities, allowable costs, and cash management requirements, as allowable costs exceeded the amounts requested for reimbursement. Current management has improved procedures related to the oversight of federal grant compliance and payroll processes. The District has engaged a third-party accounting firm and hired new staff to assist with grants reconciliation, reimbursement request preparation, and internal controls over federal awards. A secondary review process has been established for payroll and human resources transactions to ensure that no single employee has unchecked control over these functions. Grant reconciliation responsibilities have been reassigned to incorporate segregation of duties, and a defined schedule for monthly ESSER reconciliations and reimbursement submissions has been implemented. We plan to have all ESSER grant activity fully reconciled, reimbursement documentation complete and available for review, and monthly reconciliation and secondary review procedures operational and documented for all applicable federal grant programs prior to the start of the audit process. Estimated date of implementation of the corrective action plan: June 30, 2026 Person responsible for implementation of the corrective action plan: Dr. Kirk Henwood
2024-004 Activities Allowed and Allowable Costs Material Weakness Corrective Action: We now have staff that will complete the TEFAP and CSFP administrative cost reimbursement report and a signoff will be completed on the day of review by management level employees. Person Responsible: Stephano Blake...
2024-004 Activities Allowed and Allowable Costs Material Weakness Corrective Action: We now have staff that will complete the TEFAP and CSFP administrative cost reimbursement report and a signoff will be completed on the day of review by management level employees. Person Responsible: Stephano Blake Email: SBlake@harvesthope.org Phone: 803-636-6635
2024-003 SCDA Eligibility Material Weakness and Non-Material Noncompliance Corrective Action: We've hired competent staff that will maintain records of the 3 (Partner, Training and TEFAP) agreements that Agencies will sign annually for compliance. Person Responsible: Stephano Blake Email: SBlake@har...
2024-003 SCDA Eligibility Material Weakness and Non-Material Noncompliance Corrective Action: We've hired competent staff that will maintain records of the 3 (Partner, Training and TEFAP) agreements that Agencies will sign annually for compliance. Person Responsible: Stephano Blake Email: SBlake@harvesthope.org Phone: 803-636-6635
Child Nutrition Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 10.553, 10.555 Recommendation: We recommend the School District implement a documented review and approval process over reporting, including defined roles and responsibilities, required evidence of review, and retention of supporting documentation. Ex...
Child Nutrition Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 10.553, 10.555 Recommendation: We recommend the School District implement a documented review and approval process over reporting, including defined roles and responsibilities, required evidence of review, and retention of supporting documentation. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: We concur with the findings regarding the Child Nutrition Cluster and will implement the necessary actions. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Jennifer Gannon/ Dea Popovski Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 2026.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services - Community Service Block Grant Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance - Other Matters Recommendation: We recommend the Neighborhood Service Center, Inc require both check signers to evidence review and approval of supporting documentation ...
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services - Community Service Block Grant Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance - Other Matters Recommendation: We recommend the Neighborhood Service Center, Inc require both check signers to evidence review and approval of supporting documentation prior to signing the check. Documentation of that review and approval shold be readily for audit. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned/taken in response to finding: All checks presented for signatures have supporting documentation attached. Authorized check signers are instructed to review all documentation for appropriate authorization, payee name, and amounts prior to signing checks. No checks are signed without supporting documentation. The agency will require check signers to initial the check request page or other supporting documentation when signing checks for grant expenditures. The Neighborhood Service Center, Inc. is implementing a procedure to provide the Finance Committee of the Board with a listing of all checks issued between Board meetings for their review/reference. The Finance Director keeps all check stock locked in their office to avoid any potential misuse of the check stock. Name of the contact persons responsible for corrective action: R. Andrew Hollis, Executive Director Michele Lednum, Finance Director Planned completion date for corrective action plan: For immediate implementation and ongoing.
Finding 2024-002, Transaction Support Condition: The Organization internal controls did not require all transactions to be properly documented and maintained. As a consequence, we noted the Organization was not readily able to document support for accounts receivable and investments holdings at Octo...
Finding 2024-002, Transaction Support Condition: The Organization internal controls did not require all transactions to be properly documented and maintained. As a consequence, we noted the Organization was not readily able to document support for accounts receivable and investments holdings at October 31, 2024. In addition, the source and support for some revenue items selected for testing could not initially be explained or provided to the auditor to verify the reasonableness of the amount reported. Although once the Organization’s CEO became aware of the revenue testing issue she was able to identify the source documentation required to meet our audit requirements. Cause: There has been a high amount of turnover in the financial management side of the organization’s operation. Additionally, there were periods of time when accounting staff was not available because of a leave of absence. Other accounting staff tried to assist us in our request but due to the person’s limited time in the position it was difficult for them to identify the necessary support required. Effect: The Statements on Auditing Standards requires the independent auditor to review sufficient and adequate audit evidence in order to opine on the financial information. We were able to apply sufficient alternative procedures related to revenues selections. Additionally, we were able to have the Organization obtain subsequent documentation to verify the existence of the investment as of October 31, 2024. Result: It was difficult to obtain sufficient supporting documentation as required by auditing standards for all transactions subjected to audit verification.
« 1 29 30 32 33 281 »