Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
51,573
In database
Filtered Results
10,687
Matching current filters
Showing Page
414 of 428
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Finding No.: 2022-006 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education AL Program: 84.181 Special Education – Grants for Infants and Families Area: Period of Performance Questioned Costs: $0 Views of Auditee and Corrective Actions: GDOE agrees with the finding. In GDOE’s Munis system, if the Human Resou...
Finding No.: 2022-006 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education AL Program: 84.181 Special Education – Grants for Infants and Families Area: Period of Performance Questioned Costs: $0 Views of Auditee and Corrective Actions: GDOE agrees with the finding. In GDOE’s Munis system, if the Human Resources (HR) pay records are not accurately updated, GDOE payroll will reflect dated pay tables until such time HR makes the appropriate updates based on the project leads request to update accounts to current grant year. GDOE corrected the improperly charged payroll expenditures to the proper grant year via the journal voucher process. Plan of action and completion date: The GDOE Business Office will perform a monthly review of all transactions to ensure charges are recorded in the appropriate grant year. Additionally, Grant Project Managers and Program Coordinators will timely communicate to the Human Resources and Business Office any changes to accounts charged for federally funded payroll expenditures. Plan to monitor and responsible officials: GDOE Comptroller (vacant), will assign an accountant to monitor the expenditures of federal grants and the corresponding periods of performance and liquidation periods. Grant Project Managers, Federal Compliance review team will be responsible for timely communicating any changes in grant year funding to HR.
Finding No.: 2022-004 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education AL Program: 84.027 Special Education – Grants to States Area: Period of Performance Questioned Costs: $1,835 Views of Auditee and Corrective Actions: GDOE agrees with the finding. During the period of performance in question, the TPF...
Finding No.: 2022-004 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education AL Program: 84.027 Special Education – Grants to States Area: Period of Performance Questioned Costs: $1,835 Views of Auditee and Corrective Actions: GDOE agrees with the finding. During the period of performance in question, the TPFA issued check no. 2012949 to a vendor in February 2022, within the liquidation period. However, the TPFA indicated that the vendor lost the check and the TPFA re-issued payment to the vendor on January 29, 2023. The untimely reissuance of the check resulted in the transaction occurring one day after the liquidation period expired. Plan of action and completion date: As of April 2023, the TPFA has not been issuing checks to vendors, as the responsibility was returned to the GDOE to process all fiscal transactions within the GDOE Munis. The Business Office will closely monitor grant liquidation dates and payments to vendors. SOPs will be reviewed to update the procedures for monitoring grant period of performance. Plan to monitor and responsible officials: The Deputy of Finance and Administrative Services, Joann Camacho, as well as the GDOE Comptroller (vacant), will assign an accountant to monitor the expenditures of federal grants and the corresponding periods of performance and liquidation periods.
View Audit 5640 Questioned Costs: $1
• Condition: During testing of required financial reports and invoices, we noted differences in the amounts of expenses reported to grantors compared to actual expenses incurred during those periods. • Response Response MHA relies on our accounting representative to ensure that the invoices submitte...
• Condition: During testing of required financial reports and invoices, we noted differences in the amounts of expenses reported to grantors compared to actual expenses incurred during those periods. • Response Response MHA relies on our accounting representative to ensure that the invoices submitted to the accountant each week are added to the appropriate GL account to ensure the cost report reflects the correct amounts being reported to the grantors match the actual expenses incurred. • Planned Corrective Action: Again, monthly meetings reviewing the cost reports and GL together will reduce mistakes like this from MHA and the Accounting Rep. moving forward. MHA and the Accounting Rep will review the expenses being submitted for reimbursement together to ensure expenses incurred match the expenses being reported to the grantor.
• Condition: During our testing of reimbursement requests, we identified amounts that were requested for reimbursement prior to the expenses being incurred. • Response MHA relies on our accounting representative to ensure that the invoices submitted to the accountant each week are added to the appro...
• Condition: During our testing of reimbursement requests, we identified amounts that were requested for reimbursement prior to the expenses being incurred. • Response MHA relies on our accounting representative to ensure that the invoices submitted to the accountant each week are added to the appropriate GL account to ensure the account is being invoiced for the correct expenses during the proper timeframe. • Planned Corrective Action: During the newly established monthly meetings that will take place, MHA and the Accounting Rep will review the expenses being submitted for reimbursement together to ensure no invoices are submitted in advance.
View Audit 5476 Questioned Costs: $1
Agree with the finding. We will implement the segregation of duties matrix as part of SOPs. We will ensure that authorization and review of cash draws of fedral funds are done by some one other than the individual who initiates and records the transaction . We have implemented the same and Dr EIli (...
Agree with the finding. We will implement the segregation of duties matrix as part of SOPs. We will ensure that authorization and review of cash draws of fedral funds are done by some one other than the individual who initiates and records the transaction . We have implemented the same and Dr EIli (pi) is reviewing and approving the report before each withdrawal. The Finance Head ( Nafih) is withdrawing the fund .Anticipated Completion Date : 12/31/2022 Actual date of implementation :01/24/2023
The agency developed a corrective action plan that included creating a new policy and training staff in its use. Bank reconciliations are completed by the Finance Director within 5 to 10 days after receipt of bank statements. After completion of reconciliations, the finance director must provide the...
The agency developed a corrective action plan that included creating a new policy and training staff in its use. Bank reconciliations are completed by the Finance Director within 5 to 10 days after receipt of bank statements. After completion of reconciliations, the finance director must provide the executive director with the bank reconciliation and supporting general ledger for reverification.
Assistance Listing 21.023 Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERAP) ...
Assistance Listing 21.023 Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERAP) Views of the Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: We disagree with the finding regarding spending reported to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Prior to April 2022, reporting to the state was generated from a reporting dashboard within the Quickbase database. Internal controls checking these reports against raw data revealed an issue with the programming of the dashboard, and beginning in April 2022, reports were generated using raw data downloaded from the portal. Once this issue was detected and resolved, PHDC and the City sent updated and corrected reporting to the Commonwealth, along with a statement detailing our shift in methodology. This shift, and the corrected reports, were accepted by the Commonwealth, as shown in the email chains that were provided to the Controller’s Office. The data underlying the original ERA1 and ERA2 January 2022 reports cited in the finding cannot be recreated since the errors have now been permanently corrected. Auditor’s Comments on Agency’s Response: Regarding the corrected reports provided via email chains with the Commonwealth to our office, we have the following comment: Only one email chain provided had an attached “updated historical check” for ERAP1, submitted to the Commonwealth in July 2022. The historical check included a line item for the month in question, January 2022, but was still reporting the amounts of $173,807 and $22,042 for the Administrative Paid categories (See Table 6). These amounts remain unsubstantiated per our audit testing. Additionally, no corrected reports or updated historical checks were provided via these email chains to address the discrepancies noted for ERAP2 (See Table 7). Contact Person: Dan Gasiewski, Chief Grants Compliance Officer, Grants Office, Office of the Director of Finance
View Audit 5296 Questioned Costs: $1
Views of Responsible Officials: As detailed in our Policy and Procedure document Mary's Center has developed a detailed pre-audit process to ensure our formal-year end closing occurs with no issues. In preparation for our annual audit, all accounts will be reconciled prior to the beginning of the au...
Views of Responsible Officials: As detailed in our Policy and Procedure document Mary's Center has developed a detailed pre-audit process to ensure our formal-year end closing occurs with no issues. In preparation for our annual audit, all accounts will be reconciled prior to the beginning of the audit period using a detailed workflow. The workflow includes a formalized checklist and workplan with the following tasks that need to be completed:  Patient Receivable Schedule Reconciliation  Patient Revenue Reconciliation  Asset and Liability Accounts Reconciliation Views of Responsible Officials (continued): Pre-Audit reconciliation efforts and adherence to the workflow will be co-led by the Assistant Controller, Director of Grants, and Director of Revenue Initiatives and reviewed by multiple levels of leadership. In addition, to combat the growth of our organization and additional regulations we have implemented or are in the process of implementing the following activities at Mary's Center:  Employed an experienced Grant director to oversee the grant department and optimize productivity and quality;  Actively enlisting the services of an experienced Finance Consultant to perform an assessment of the entire Finance department including current process and staffing needs;  Invested in technologies such as Sage Intacct ERP (industry leader) to replace manual processes;  Budgeted for additional Finance staffing in our upcoming annual budget to combat current capacity issues. Collectively, these processes and staffing updates will ensure Data Collection Forms are submitted timely going forward.
Views of Responsible Officials: Mary's Center now has a robust process where the agreed upon provisional indirect rate or (if applicable) the specific rate included in the final Grant agreement is the governing default rate used for each Grant. In any scenarios where a change in rate is being reques...
Views of Responsible Officials: Mary's Center now has a robust process where the agreed upon provisional indirect rate or (if applicable) the specific rate included in the final Grant agreement is the governing default rate used for each Grant. In any scenarios where a change in rate is being requested, the Program Manager alerts the Senior Grant Accountant assigned to the grant and provides supporting documentation from the Grant funder of an addendum to the existing Grant agreement. If for any reason the Finance team is using an upward or downward adjustment to the provisional indirect rate or what was agreed upon in the Grant agreement the EVP Finance and Director of Grants must approve this change and notify the EVPs of Health and Programs and Development prior to implementing this change. All changes are documented. In addition, to ensure the rate in the agreement is the same rate being used when invoicing Grant funders, the Finance team conducts a thorough reconciliation process during the year.
Views of Responsible Officials: Mary's Center now has the following process in place to directly address this issue. Please see details below: All cash disbursements must be supported by an automated invoice, contract, and/or valuation documentation in the financial accounting system (Sage Intacct) ...
Views of Responsible Officials: Mary's Center now has the following process in place to directly address this issue. Please see details below: All cash disbursements must be supported by an automated invoice, contract, and/or valuation documentation in the financial accounting system (Sage Intacct) prior to payment. The same process applies for both purchase order and nonpurchase order related invoices. Any individual invoice exceeding $10,000 requires approval from both Department and Finance leadership prior to payment. Monthly Finance Team meetings are held to address staff's outstanding questions/concerns about workflows and processes.
Internal Control over Cash Receipts and Disbursements Name of contact person and title: Charlia Messinger, Executive Director Anticipated completion date: 12/31/23 Agency’s response: Concur the organization agrees with this finding and will implement the following:Partners in Prevention Education w...
Internal Control over Cash Receipts and Disbursements Name of contact person and title: Charlia Messinger, Executive Director Anticipated completion date: 12/31/23 Agency’s response: Concur the organization agrees with this finding and will implement the following:Partners in Prevention Education will adopt internal control procedures matching requirements from 2 CFR section 200.303 and other government standards of non-profit financial control. This will be adopted by the Executive Director and Board by December 31, 2023.
Planned Corrective Action: The Planned Corrective Action is to instruct future GID Grant Managers the importance of having qualifying receipts or invoices that correspond directly to the amount of Federal funds being requested for reimbursement. To facilitate this successfully, Project costs must be...
Planned Corrective Action: The Planned Corrective Action is to instruct future GID Grant Managers the importance of having qualifying receipts or invoices that correspond directly to the amount of Federal funds being requested for reimbursement. To facilitate this successfully, Project costs must be paid with non-Federal entity funds before summitting a payment reimbursement request from the Grant program funds. Name of Contact Person: Erling A. Juel, District Manager, will be responsible for implementing this corrective action by working with the District’s grant managers to properly implement the corrective action for on-going and current grants. Anticipated completion date: The Corrective Action will be implemented immediately and applied to the administration of on-going Federal grants.
Planned Corrective Action: The Planned Corrective Action is to instruct GID Grant Managers the critical need to and importance of properly documenting the use of GID resources as it applies to the recipient’s in-kind match contribution. The Grant Manager must coordinate with Project Superintendent o...
Planned Corrective Action: The Planned Corrective Action is to instruct GID Grant Managers the critical need to and importance of properly documenting the use of GID resources as it applies to the recipient’s in-kind match contribution. The Grant Manager must coordinate with Project Superintendent on a weekly basis to summarize the GID labor, GID equipment, and GID materials utilized on the grant specific project. Rates applied are those proposed and accepted during negotiation of the governing Grant Agreement. If an item not previously addressed in the Grant Agreement is utilized on the Project and its use is to be claimed, the rate to apply should correspond to the GID’s current rate sheet in effect. Name of Contact Person: Erling A. Juel, District Manager, will be responsible for implementing this corrective action by working with the District’s grant managers to properly implement the corrective action for on-going and current grants. Anticipated completion date: The Corrective Action will be implemented immediately and applied to the administration of on-going Federal grants.
GCCAC will have reports looked at more closely by the VP of Finance before they are submitted.
GCCAC will have reports looked at more closely by the VP of Finance before they are submitted.
Finding 3141 (2022-002)
Material Weakness 2022
The County plan has been implemented.
The County plan has been implemented.
The Deputy Finance Director and the Finance Department identified the transactions as potentially being incorrectly recorded; however, it was not identified timely and/or officially addressed, and was not detected by the Grants Administrator as being recorded in the incorrect period. At the moment ...
The Deputy Finance Director and the Finance Department identified the transactions as potentially being incorrectly recorded; however, it was not identified timely and/or officially addressed, and was not detected by the Grants Administrator as being recorded in the incorrect period. At the moment the trial balances and year-end closing procedures were being completed, the City was operating without a Finance Director. The Deputy Finance Director and Finance Department were working diligently to review the accounting and handle various tasks, but were not able to timely address the issue with the specific transactions mentioned above. During June 2023, the City hired a Finance Director which will allow the Deputy Finance Director and staff to improve year-end closing procedures and will provide additional support to the Finance Department to ensure controls in place over financial reporting are sufficient. The Grants Administrator will be more involved in communicating with the Finance Department, at a minimum on a monthly basis, as related to reporting of expenditures that are being funded by federal, state, and local awards.
Finding 2977 (2022-012)
Significant Deficiency 2022
Findinq No.:2022-012 Period of Performance Responding Agency: Department of Public Administration (DOA) Responsible Personnel: Edward M. Birn, Director (DOA) The extension was granted by the Department of lnterior.
Findinq No.:2022-012 Period of Performance Responding Agency: Department of Public Administration (DOA) Responsible Personnel: Edward M. Birn, Director (DOA) The extension was granted by the Department of lnterior.
Findinq No.:2022-011 ADP System for SNAP Responding Agency: Department of Public Health and Social Services (DPHSS) Responsible Personnel: Arthur San Augustin, Director (DPHSS) DPHSS agrees with the finding. Effective 1011123 The Bureau of Economic Security, and Division of Public Welfare superviso...
Findinq No.:2022-011 ADP System for SNAP Responding Agency: Department of Public Health and Social Services (DPHSS) Responsible Personnel: Arthur San Augustin, Director (DPHSS) DPHSS agrees with the finding. Effective 1011123 The Bureau of Economic Security, and Division of Public Welfare supervisors are verifying documents and making sure it is complete and uploaded into the system. A checklist will be created to ensure all vital documents are completed and uploaded.
View Audit 4883 Questioned Costs: $1
The District Treasurer will immediately request that the engineer implement these recommendations.
The District Treasurer will immediately request that the engineer implement these recommendations.
The District Treasurer will immediately request that the engineer implement these recommendations.
The District Treasurer will immediately request that the engineer implement these recommendations.
The Treasurer will immediately contact the bank and make arrangements to have the account collateralized, and will access the SAMs system to have all funding deposed into the construction account. The District has requested their insurance provider to add the required position fidelity bonding.
The Treasurer will immediately contact the bank and make arrangements to have the account collateralized, and will access the SAMs system to have all funding deposed into the construction account. The District has requested their insurance provider to add the required position fidelity bonding.
Finding 2658 (2022-002)
Significant Deficiency 2022
The Organization will implement a corrective action plan to make sure there are proper internal controls with regards to expenditures. The policy will be updated with guidelines for the approval process. Program managers will be responsible for managing and approving expenditure for programs. Automa...
The Organization will implement a corrective action plan to make sure there are proper internal controls with regards to expenditures. The policy will be updated with guidelines for the approval process. Program managers will be responsible for managing and approving expenditure for programs. Automated bill pay systems like Bill.com have been implemented for documenting the approvals of expenditures. Expected completion and implementation of the purchasing policy: December 2023.
REFERENCE # 2022-005 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE – SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY- NONCOMPLIANCE Program Name/ALN Emergency Food and Shelter National Board Program (ALN # 97.024) Criteria: Compliance Supplement Requirement: A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred du...
REFERENCE # 2022-005 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE – SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY- NONCOMPLIANCE Program Name/ALN Emergency Food and Shelter National Board Program (ALN # 97.024) Criteria: Compliance Supplement Requirement: A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308 200.309 and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition/Context: Division receive Emergency Food and Shelter National Board Program funds from the U.S. Department Homeland security/FEMA and various pass-through entities. The Division’s pass-through Contract requires period of performance and also requires funds must be expended by certain date. Of the Sixty (60) files selected for testing We noted that the Division: • For 4 samples, we noted that Division program expenses were recorded prior to Contract starting date. Questioned Costs: Cannot be determined Recommendation: We recommend Division charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a pass-through award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the pass-through entity. Corrective Action Plan: The Division will charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a pass-through award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the pass-through entity. Step 1 Action Date: Ongoing Final Implementation Date: 12/31/2023 Name and Phone # Of Person Responsible for Implementation: Jeanne Stromberg, Major, Divisional Finance Secretary (916) 563-3710
View Audit 4368 Questioned Costs: $1
REFERENCE # 2022-004 CASH MANAGEMENT – MATERIAL WEAKNESS- NONCOMPLIANCE Program Name/ALN Emergency Food and Shelter National Board Program (ALN # 97.024) Criteria: Non-Federal Entities Other Than States- Non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsi...
REFERENCE # 2022-004 CASH MANAGEMENT – MATERIAL WEAKNESS- NONCOMPLIANCE Program Name/ALN Emergency Food and Shelter National Board Program (ALN # 97.024) Criteria: Non-Federal Entities Other Than States- Non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the US Treasury or pass-through entity and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program or project costs and the proportionate share of allowable indirect costs, whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means (2 CFR section 200.305(b)). What constitutes minimized elapsed time for funds transfer will depend on what payment system/method a non-federal entity uses. Under the advance payment method, federal awarding agency or pass-through entity payment is made to the non-federal entity before the non-federal entity disburses the funds for program purposes (2 CFR section 200.3). A non-federal entity must be paid in advance provided that it maintains, or demonstrates the willingness to maintain, both written procedures that minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the US Treasury and disbursement by the non-federal entity, as well as a financial management system that meets the specified standards for fund control and accountability (2 CFR section 200.305(b)(1)). Condition/Context: Division receive Emergency Food and Shelter National Board Program funds from the U.S. Department Homeland security/FEMA and various pass-through entities. Division receives advance funds from the pass-through agency and incurred program expenditures. Of the Sixty (60) files selected for testing We noted that the Division: (1) Does not have written procedures that minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Pass-through entity and disbursement by the Division. Questioned Costs: Cannot be determined Recommendation: We recommend Division minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Pass-through entity and disbursement by the Division. Corrective Action Plan: The Division will strive to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Pass-through entity and disbursement by the Division. Step 1 Action Date: Ongoing Final Implementation Date: 12/31/2023 Name and Phone # Of Person Responsible for Implementation: Jeanne Stromberg, Major, Divisional Finance Secretary (916) 563-3710
View Audit 4368 Questioned Costs: $1
We concur with the recommendation, and a formalized and independently monitored process was implemented to reconcile refundable advances routinely and in coordination with the recognition and allocation of allowable costs effective August of 2023.
We concur with the recommendation, and a formalized and independently monitored process was implemented to reconcile refundable advances routinely and in coordination with the recognition and allocation of allowable costs effective August of 2023.
« 1 412 413 415 416 428 »