Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
51,573
In database
Filtered Results
17,121
Matching current filters
Showing Page
7 of 685
25 per page

Filters

Clear
This segregation of duties weakness is impratical to totally correct due to the limited resources and staff available to the district. The District will continue to use other controls, where practical, to compensate for this limitation.
This segregation of duties weakness is impratical to totally correct due to the limited resources and staff available to the district. The District will continue to use other controls, where practical, to compensate for this limitation.
Subject: Management response to Fiscal Year 2025 Audit Findings The management of Village Tech Schools acknowledges receipt of the following findings for the FY25 audit and has developed a corrective action plan response to address the findings. Finding 2025-001: Reporting – Significant deficiency i...
Subject: Management response to Fiscal Year 2025 Audit Findings The management of Village Tech Schools acknowledges receipt of the following findings for the FY25 audit and has developed a corrective action plan response to address the findings. Finding 2025-001: Reporting – Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance. Management Response: The District’s Child Nutrition Supervisor (CNS) prepared the claims data submitted into the Tx-UNPS System to receive Child Nutrition federal funding. The claims data was submitted without management approval. The District will implement procedures to ensure that monthly claim reports are reviewed by the Chief Operations Officer (COO) prior to being submitted into Tx-UNPS System. The CNS will prepare the claims report documentation, which includes the point of sale and attendance reports. The claims report and supporting documentation will be emailed to the COO. Once the reports are reviewed and determined to be accurate, the COO will email approval. Once the CNS receives approval via email from the COO, the email will be printed or digitally saved with the claims reports. The CNS will submit claims data into the Tx-UNPS System and print the NSLP Claim for Reimbursement Summary. The Summary will be sent to the COO for confirmation. The new process will begin in October 2025.
Magnolia Manor Corporation has taken steps to ensure that the Replacement Reserve account will not be underfunded by withdrawing funds to cover the Operating Account. The underfunded amount of $2,688.00 has been deposited on August 20, 2025, and $306.00 has been deposited on September 15, 2025. Magn...
Magnolia Manor Corporation has taken steps to ensure that the Replacement Reserve account will not be underfunded by withdrawing funds to cover the Operating Account. The underfunded amount of $2,688.00 has been deposited on August 20, 2025, and $306.00 has been deposited on September 15, 2025. Magnolia Manor Corporation has reviewed the auditors' recommendation and will ensure that more thorough monthly reviews will be implemented.
Corrective Action Plan Matchbook Learning Schools of Indiana, Inc. Finding 2025-001 – Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Federal Program: Title I, Part A (84.010) Repeat Finding: Yes (Prior Audit Finding 2024-004) Corrective Action Plan Matchbook Learning Schools of Indiana, Inc. acknowledges the Maintenan...
Corrective Action Plan Matchbook Learning Schools of Indiana, Inc. Finding 2025-001 – Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Federal Program: Title I, Part A (84.010) Repeat Finding: Yes (Prior Audit Finding 2024-004) Corrective Action Plan Matchbook Learning Schools of Indiana, Inc. acknowledges the Maintenance of Effort (MOE) finding related to the accuracy of expenditures reported on the Form 9 cash-basis report submitted to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE). This finding is a repeat finding from the prior audit period. The School recognizes that prior corrective actions were not sufficient to fully address the reliability of Form 9 reporting. As a result, the School has enhanced and formalized internal controls surrounding Form 9 preparation, review, and submission to ensure compliance with IDOE guidelines and to prevent recurrence of this issue. Corrective Actions Implemented 1. Formal Form 9 Reconciliation Process ○ The School has implemented a documented reconciliation process to compare internal cash-basis financial records to the Form 9 prior to submission. ○ This reconciliation ensures that only allowable cash expenditures are reported and that reported totals align with bank activity and supporting documentation. 2. Strengthened Review and Approval Controls ○ Preparation of the Form 9 is now subject to a multi-level review process. ○ The Form 9 will be reviewed by the School’s financial consultant and School leadership to confirm accuracy, compliance with IDOE reporting guidance, and consistency with underlying financial records prior to submission. 3. Written Procedures and Staff Training ○ Written internal procedures have been developed outlining Form 9 preparation requirements, including proper treatment of accruals, timing differences, and non-cash items. ○ Staff involved in financial reporting have received refresher training on IDOE Form 9 reporting requirements and maintenance of effort considerations. 4. Ongoing Monitoring and Communication ○ The School will perform periodic internal monitoring of cash-basis expenditures throughout the fiscal year to identify potential discrepancies prior to year-end reporting. ○ When necessary, the School will proactively communicate with IDOE to clarify reporting requirements before submission. Responsible Officials ● Board of Directors ● School Leadership ● Director of Finance Planned Completion Date ● Immediate and Ongoing These procedures have been implemented and will be applied to the current and all future reporting periods. Expected Results The implementation of these enhanced internal controls will ensure that Form 9 expense reporting is accurate, complete, and prepared in accordance with IDOE guidelines. This will support reliable Maintenance of Effort calculations by IDOE and is expected to prevent recurrence of this finding in future audit periods. Don Stewart COO Matchbook Learning
The board of trustees regularly reviews financial statements, bank reconciliations, and budget vs. actual information to help to mitigate the lack of ideal segregation of duties.
The board of trustees regularly reviews financial statements, bank reconciliations, and budget vs. actual information to help to mitigate the lack of ideal segregation of duties.
Corrective Action Planned: Due to the Authority’s size, it is cost-prohibitive and impractical to achieve the ideal level of segregation of duties. The Authority has implemented as many controls and segregation of duties as practically possible for an organization of this size. Completion Date: Ongo...
Corrective Action Planned: Due to the Authority’s size, it is cost-prohibitive and impractical to achieve the ideal level of segregation of duties. The Authority has implemented as many controls and segregation of duties as practically possible for an organization of this size. Completion Date: Ongoing
Management acknowledges the missing internal control over the late submission of the updated financial model/plan for the fiscal year end June 30, 2024. Management has maintained an effective internal control tool for many years in the form of a master spreadsheet called the Annual Task Calendar tha...
Management acknowledges the missing internal control over the late submission of the updated financial model/plan for the fiscal year end June 30, 2024. Management has maintained an effective internal control tool for many years in the form of a master spreadsheet called the Annual Task Calendar that the entire Finance staff reviews at every biweekly Finance meeting, but the WIFIA deadlines were errantly not incorporated into that tool until January 2026. While management agrees with the finding, it should be noted that management was not operating without controls. Rather, the deadline being adhered to was just the wrong date. Management submitted updated financial model/plan by January 31, 2025, which was within the month following the close of the calendar year, similarly to the quarterly construction reports that are due 30 days after the end of the preceding quarter. In addition, the data on the annual model reflected current information near the time of release of the report, not June 30, 2024. So, in substance, management provided an even more current, relevant document. Management acknowledges the additional finding language that the June 30, 2025 quarterly construction monitoring report was submitted on day 31 rather than day 30 following the close of the quarter. Finally, management acknowledges that the annual updated financial model/plan for June 30, 2025, will be submitted in January 2026 as the internal control, as mentioned above, was not corrected until January 2026, which will result in the same finding on the Single Audit for June 30, 2026. However, management believes that we have taken the appropriate measures required to avoid ongoing replication. Responsible Official: Matt Zook, Finance Director
Comments on Findings and Recommendations: Management concurs with the findings and auditors’ recommendations to enhance internal controls to ensure compliance with the HUD Regulatory Agreement. Action(s) Taken or Planned: 2025-001: The underfunded replacement reserve deposit will be deposited into t...
Comments on Findings and Recommendations: Management concurs with the findings and auditors’ recommendations to enhance internal controls to ensure compliance with the HUD Regulatory Agreement. Action(s) Taken or Planned: 2025-001: The underfunded replacement reserve deposit will be deposited into the replacement reserve account as cash flow allows during fiscal year 2026. Furthermore, internal controls over replacement reserve funding are being strengthened to prevent future non-compliance.
The Organization has set up a system to review transfers of federal funding by the Senior Asset Manager and Chief Financial Officer prior to the transfer taking place to ensure it is within the compliance requirements of the grant
The Organization has set up a system to review transfers of federal funding by the Senior Asset Manager and Chief Financial Officer prior to the transfer taking place to ensure it is within the compliance requirements of the grant
Bethany College and Affiliate Corrective Action Plan For the Year Ended June 30, 2025 Finding 2025‐001 – Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance – Return of Title IV Funds Condition Found: Four students who had withdrawn from the institution did not have Title IV funds returned to...
Bethany College and Affiliate Corrective Action Plan For the Year Ended June 30, 2025 Finding 2025‐001 – Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance – Return of Title IV Funds Condition Found: Four students who had withdrawn from the institution did not have Title IV funds returned to the Department of Education within 45 days. Corrective Action Plan: The College will review our workflow and make oversight improvements to prevent future delays, including standardizing withdrawal notification and handoff procedures, initiating R2T4 calculations immediately upon withdrawal determination, confirming that required COD adjustments are submitted without delay and establishing internal tracking to monitor return activity against the 45 day requirement. Responsible Official for Corrective Action Plan: Sarah Sherinian, Vice President for Student Success & Operational Excellence/Chief Financial Aid Officer
Recommendation: CLA recommends the District review its grant disbursement process to ensure that there is adequate segregation of duties in regards to initiating, authorizing, reviewing for grant allowability and approving purchases, along with adding controls to ensure that the item purchased was r...
Recommendation: CLA recommends the District review its grant disbursement process to ensure that there is adequate segregation of duties in regards to initiating, authorizing, reviewing for grant allowability and approving purchases, along with adding controls to ensure that the item purchased was received by the District. CLA also also recommends the District printout the eligibility reports from Wisegrants and sign and date them to indicate review and approval after meeting with CESA 10 each year. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with this finding. Action planned/taken in response to finding: The District will note the date of the budget meeting with CESA 10. When items are purchased for Title I, approval will be made by either the Elementary Principal or Superintendent before purchases are made. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Brooke Rosemeyer, Adrian Foster, Brandon Baldry Planned completion date for corrective action plan: September 1, 2026.
Child Nutrition Cluster (School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, and Summer Food Service Program for Children) – Assistance Listing No. 10.553, 10.555, and 10.559 Recommendation: CLA recommends that the District review its internal controls and implement a procedure to ensure all re...
Child Nutrition Cluster (School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, and Summer Food Service Program for Children) – Assistance Listing No. 10.553, 10.555, and 10.559 Recommendation: CLA recommends that the District review its internal controls and implement a procedure to ensure all reports required under the grant have a designated reviewer that is different from the individual responsible for preparing, even when there are gaps of coverage in preparer and reviewer positions, and that the review and approval happens prior to submitting the reports to the granting agency. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with this finding. Action planned/taken in response to finding: The Food Service Director and the Executive Administrative Assistant will work together to ensure that procedures are in place to review and confirm for accuracy. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Frankie Soto, Dawn Rausch Planned completion date for corrective action plan: September 1, 2026.
Child Nutrition Cluster (School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, and Summer Food Service Program for Children) – Assistance Listing No. 10.553, 10.555, and 10.559 Recommendation: CLA recommends that the District implement formal procedures to strengthen controls over eligibility det...
Child Nutrition Cluster (School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, and Summer Food Service Program for Children) – Assistance Listing No. 10.553, 10.555, and 10.559 Recommendation: CLA recommends that the District implement formal procedures to strengthen controls over eligibility determinations. These procedures should include ensuring timely updates to eligibility listings when students become ineligible, retaining all required documentation for the applicable retention period, and conducting periodic reviews of benefit issuance listings to confirm accuracy. Additionally, CLA recommends the District implement procedures to ensure staff receive training on proper eligibility determination and recordkeeping requirements. Finally, CLA recommends the District establish monitoring controls to verify that benefits are discontinued promptly for students who no longer qualify. Eligibility determinations should be reviewed and approved by someone other than the person entering the applications and direct certification information into the software. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with this finding. Action planned/taken in response to finding: The Food Service Director, high school secretary and the Executive Administrative Assistant will work together to ensure that procedures are in place to review and confirm for accuracy. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Frankie Soto, Dawn Rausch, Emily Krzyzanowski Planned completion date for corrective action plan: September 1, 2026.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.994 Significant Deficiency, Nonmaterial Noncompliance – Reporting Finding 2025-010 – Repeat Finding Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per Section 200.303 of...
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.994 Significant Deficiency, Nonmaterial Noncompliance – Reporting Finding 2025-010 – Repeat Finding Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per Section 200.303 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Per 2 CFR 200.334 the recipient must retain all federal award records for three years from the date of submission of their final financial report. Condition: During the audit we tested 9 reports and noted the following: a) There was one (1) instance out of (9) nine reports tested where the submitted reports were unable to be provided, including the date of submission for the reports. b) There were four (4) instances out of nine (9) reports tested where the County was unable to provide evidence the report was reviewed prior to submission. c) There were two (2) instances out of nine (9) reports tested where the County was unable to provide the date of submission for the reports. Questioned Costs: None of the nonmaterial noncompliance items resulted in questioned costs. Effect: By not having the required documentation and underlying support, the County is not able to demonstrate compliance with the applicable requirements. Cause: The County did not have a formal policy to ensure documentation was retained to evidence review and submission of all reports. Recommendation: While the County made updates to policies and procedures surrounding reporting during the current year to address the prior year finding, the County should ensure these policies are adhered to ensure all submitted reports and underlying data are retained in accordance with the Uniform Grant Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and is implementing procedures to correct this which is further discussed in the Corrective Action Plan. Corrective Action Plan: As of July 2025, The Health Department has created and adopted policy FIS-05 Retention of Reporting Requirement Submissions to ensure that federal award reports and data are retained in accordance with Uniform Guidance. The Health Department will document with screen shots as outlined in the FIS-05 Policy, to address circumstances when the required report consists of answering a NCDHHS survey or form that does not have “save” or “download” capability, to maintain record of documented submissions. In addition, the Health Department has developed a standard operating procedure whereby fiscal compliance Management Analysts, in collaboration with Program Managers, ensure they have reviewed federal award reports prior to submission and file documentation of review and approvals. While review of grant reports is common, the Health Department did not have adequate documentation to demonstrate completion of this step prior to July 2025. An additional training, to be recorded, will be held with program staff Friday December 19th, 2025. Anticipated Completion Date: December 19,, 2025 Responsible Person(s): Autumn Watson, Business Operations Director
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.558 Significant Deficiency and Nonmaterial Noncompliance – Child Support Non-Cooperatio...
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.558 Significant Deficiency and Nonmaterial Noncompliance – Child Support Non-Cooperation Finding 2025-008 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per Section 200.303 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The County should have adequate documentation for each participant that supports each sanction for noncooperation. Condition: a) There was one (1) instance out of two (2) sanctions tested where the required form to be sent was dated after the sanction start date. b) There was one (1) instance out of two (2) sanctions tested where the sanction was not properly documented. Questioned Costs: None of the nonmaterial noncompliance items resulted in questioned costs. Effect: When required sanction notifications are not issued prior to the sanction start date and sanctions are not properly documented, there is an increased risk that clients may not be properly informed of program actions and that the County may not comply with program requirements. Cause: The County did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that required sanction notifications were issued prior to the sanction start date and that all sanctions were properly documented in accordance with program requirements. Recommendation: The County should implement procedures to ensure all required sanction notifications are issued prior to the sanction start date and that sanctions are properly documented in accordance with program requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and is implementing procedures to correct this, which is further discussed in the Corrective Action Plan. Corrective Action Plan: Performance Improvement Strategy: Collaborate with Child Support Services to improve understanding of their processes and ensure accurate case handling. Responsible Individuals: Sarah Carter, Tatyenne Rone, Karl Parisien, Denize Cuff (Sr. Quality and Training Specialist), Danisa Concepcion (Quality and Training Supervisor), Staphon Snelling (Training and Development Manager), Scott Fritz (Social Services Manager), Program Supervisors Training: Non-Cooperation Sanction Training Anticipated Completion Date: To be completed quarterly. Responsible Individuals: Sarah Carter, Tatyenne Rone, Karl Parisien, Denize Cuff (Sr. Quality and Training Specialist). Danisa Concepcion (Quality and Training Supervisor), Staphon Snelling (Training and Development) Anticipated Completion Date: Completed by January 2026.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.558 Material Weakness and Nonmaterial Noncompliance – Eligibility and Special Tests: In...
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.558 Material Weakness and Nonmaterial Noncompliance – Eligibility and Special Tests: Income Eligibility and Verification System Finding 2025-007 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per Section 200.303 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The County should have adequate documentation for each participant that supports each eligibility determination, and the information entered into NCFAST. We noted several errors related to the following compliance criteria: a) An OVS inquiry must be completed and agreed to information reported in NC FAST. b) For the month of application, Work First cash assistance payments are prorated from the date of application, with the date of application being day one. c) All Work First applicants must provide a Social Security number or apply for a Social Security number if they do not have one. d) Parents and step-parents who apply for children must be included in the case with the child, unless they are otherwise ineligible. Condition: The following are the results of nonmaterial noncompliance noted for each criteria listed above out of the 25 program participants selected for testing a) There were two instances where the OVS query was not run at the time of the determination. b) There was one instance where a hearing extension was incorrectly prorated. c) There was one instance where the social security number was not verified. d) There was one instance where kinship was not documented. Lastly, the following are the results of 60 program participants tested for control testing: a) There were three instances where the County did not remediate the errors identified within their internal review timely. b) There was one instance where a participant received benefits for one month where they should not have. c) There was one instance where incorrect forms were sent to a participant. Questioned Costs: None of the nonmaterial noncompliance items resulted in questioned costs. Effect: By not having the required documentation in the files or information being incorrectly documented, eligibility cannot be readily substantiated and there is a risk the County could provide funding to individuals who are not eligible. Cause: County oversight when performing reviews over applications. Additionally, the County does not have a formal process in place to ensure issues identified during the review process are appropriately corrected on a consistent and timely basis. Recommendation: Although these issues will occur from time to time considering the volume of case files, the County should review their processes to ensure proper supporting documentation of eligibility is maintained within each case file. Additionally, Mecklenburg County should consider implementing a formal policy for the requirements of having documentation corrected within a specific timeframe once identified and monitored throughout the year for adherence to the policy. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and is implementing procedures to correct this which is further discussed in the Corrective Action Plan. Corrective Action Plan: Performance Improvement Strategy: The Economic Services Division (ESD) Quality and Training Specialist will conduct a 25% sample review of all ongoing cases. Errors identified during these reviews will be documented and communicated to both the Social Services Supervisor and the assigned Eligibility Specialist for correction within a defined timeframe. Failure to comply with correction timelines will result in corrective action. Case Review and Error Notification • ESD Sr. Quality and Training Specialist will review 25% of all ongoing cases. • Errors will be documented on checking sheets and emailed to both the supervisor and the assigned Eligibility Specialist. • Corrections must be completed within 5 business days of notification. Corrective Action • If corrections are not completed within the extended timeframe: o Corrective Action will be initiated in accordance with departmental performance management protocols. Responsible Individuals: Sarah Carter, Tatyenne Rone, Karl Parisien, Denize Cuff (Sr. Quality and Training Specialist), Danisa Concepcion (Quality and Training Supervisor), Staphon Snelling (Training & Development Manager), Scott Fritz (Social Services Manager), Program Supervisors Anticipated Completion Date: To be completed monthly. Training: Training Completion Required for the Following Quality Review Errors: • Ensure the OVS inquiry is completed, and that the information aligns with data reported in NC FAST. • Understand that Work First cash assistance payments are prorated from the application date, which is considered Day One. • Confirm that all Work First applicants must provide a valid Social Security number or apply for one if not already obtained. • Review and apply the rules of kinship, specifically regarding parents and stepparents. Additionally, train supervisors and eligibility specialists on the importance of timely resolution of quality sampling errors and how delays can impact audit outcomes. Responsible Individuals: Sr. Quality & Training Specialists, Quality & Training Supervisor, Training & Development Manager. Anticipated Completion Date: An email will be sent by the Staff Development Unit to the Eligibility Specialist with errors by January 2026, and in-person training will be completed by February 2026.
Program Name: Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children Federal Assistance Listing Number 10.557 Significant Deficiency – Eligibility Finding 2025-005 Criteria: Per Section 200.303 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective...
Program Name: Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children Federal Assistance Listing Number 10.557 Significant Deficiency – Eligibility Finding 2025-005 Criteria: Per Section 200.303 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition: There were 6 instances out of 60 program participants tested for control testing where the County did not remediate the errors identified within their internal review timely. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Failure to promptly remediate errors identified during internal review increases the risk that program participants may receive benefits or incur costs that do not comply with program requirements, potentially resulting in noncompliance and questioned costs. Cause: The County does not have a formal process in place to ensure issues identified during the review process are appropriately corrected on a consistent and timely basis. Recommendation: Mecklenburg County should consider implementing a formal policy for the requirements of having documentation corrected within a specific timeframe once identified and monitored throughout the year for adherence to the policy. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and is implementing procedures to correct this which is further discussed in the Corrective Action Plan. Corrective Action Plan: The WIC Sr. Quality and Training Specialist conducts quarterly monitoring by observing staff and completed random chart reviews. However, due to retrospective nature of audits significant time elapses between the occurrence of the error and its identification. Late corrections in the crossroads system will compromise data integrity and disrupt some of the certification processes in crossroads. Crossroads also lacks the ability to alert supervisors of missing documentation which in turn creates a huge administrative burden to monitor missing documentation in real time. WIC program leadership will create a policy that will address documentation standards. WIC staff will be instructed not to alter the original entry, instead a correction addendum will be documented to acknowledge missing data. WIC program will continue to provide policy refreshers every quarter to address these findings and provide staff updated information. WIC supervisors will review the quarterly audits results with their staff and ensure staff follow the standards set by the department leadership. The following the phases of the corrective action plan will be completed by March 31st, 2026. Phase 1: Review of Federal and State Guidelines Phase 2: Creation of Document Standard Policy Phase 3: Implementation of new documentation standards policy. Anticipated Completion Date: March 31st, 2026 Responsible Person(s): Ali Raza, WIC Director
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Medical Assistance Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.778 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: North Carolina Department of Health an...
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Medical Assistance Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.778 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Children's Health Insurance Program Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.767 Material Weakness and Nonmaterial Noncompliance - Eligibility Finding 2025-002 - Repeat Finding Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per Section 200.303 of the Uniform Grant Guidance, a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The County should have adequate documentation for each participant that supports each eligibility determination, and the information entered into NCFAST. We noted several errors related to the following compliance criteria: a) Self-attestation wages should be compared to information in NC FAST. b) All countable resources should be confirmed and recalculated and ensure they are computed accurately in NC FAST. c) The caseworker should prepare and submit a DMA-5097 form in the case of incompatible income verification and self-attestation income as described in the Eligibility Review Document. d) Citizenship should be documented within NCFAST. e) Household information should be entered correctly into NCFAST. Condition: The following are the results of nonmaterial noncompliance noted for each criteria listed above out of the 124 program participants selected for testing: a) There were six instances where the participants self-attest wages did not agree to the wages entered into NC FAST. b) There was one instance where the countable resources were inaccurate within NC FAST. c) There were five instances where the income was incompatible between the income verification and self-attestation income but no DMA-5097 was sent. d) There was one instance where the participant's citizenship was not documented in NCFAST. e) There was one instance where the participant's household size was entered incorrectly into NCFAST. Lastly, there were 6 instances out of 60 program participants tested for control testing where the County did not remediate the errors identified within their internal review timely. Context: There were 8 out of 124 unique participants tested with the errors noted above. Questioned Costs: We noted no federal questioned costs for the County as the State of North Carolina makes all benefit payments to participants directly. Due to split eligibility determinations between the Counties and the State of North Carolina for Medicaid, we found $25,105 in benefit payments made by the State of North Carolina to ineligible participants based on an improper eligibility determinations at the County related to three individuals in item "a" above. Effect: By not having the required documentation in the files or information being incorrectly documented, eligibility cannot be readily substantiated and there is a risk the County could provide funding to individuals who are not eligible. Cause: County oversight when performing reviews over applications. Additionally, the County does not have a formal process in place to ensure issues identified during the review process are appropriately corrected on a consistent and timely basis. Recommendation: Although these issues will occur from time to time considering the volume of case files, the County should review their processes to ensure proper supporting documentation of eligibility is maintained within each case file. Additionally, Mecklenburg County should consider implementing a formal policy for the requirements of having documentation corrected within a specific timeframe once identified and monitored throughout the year for adherence to the policy. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and is implementing procedures to correct this which is further discussed in the Corrective Action Plan. Corrective Action Plan: Performance Improvement Strategy: The County has identified specific opportunities to strengthen accuracy and consistency in eligibility case documentation. While overall performance has improved, with total errors reduced from 14 the prior audit period to 8 in the current period, continued focus is necessary to further reduce errors and sustain compliance across case files. The Economic Services Division Strategies are as follows: • Social Services Supervisors will conduct targeted reviews of identified error trends, emphasizing policy application, documentation completeness, and process standardization to ensure consistent eligibility determinations across the program. • The Economic Services Division's Staff Development Unit will continue to quality sample cases to promote accuracy and accountability. • Social Service Supervisors, in coordination with Medicaid Social Services Managers will coach staff based on audit findings, monitor trends and ensure required corrections are completed within 5 business days of notification. • Failure to complete corrections within the approved timeframe will result in corrective action to both the Social Services Supervisor and the assigned Eligibility Specialist in accordance with departmental performance management protocols. • Supervisory staff will ensure all updates to the Quality Sampling Tracking Log are finalized no later than the 20th calendar day of the subsequent month to support timely monitoring, trend analysis, and corrective action. These actions are designed to strengthen internal controls, support staff performance and maintain compliance with applicable state and federal requirements. Responsible lndividual(s): Kim Konior, Lynn Martin (Medicaid Program Managers), Staphon Snelling (Training and Development Manager), Danisa Concepion, Donnie Munson (Quality and Training Supervisors), and Social Services Medicaid Supervisors. Anticipated Completion Date: Ongoing Training: The Economic Services Division's Staff Development Unit will review the Single Audit findings and develop targeted training for staff responsible for determining Medicaid eligibility, as well as their supervisors and managers. This training will specifically address the errors identified in the audit and will be delivered by the end of March 2026. In addition, Staff Development will provide quarterly training to Medicaid eligibility staff, supervisors, and managers based on error trends identified through quality sampling conducted by the unit. To ensure effectiveness, a structured training approach will be used: • A pre-test will assess staffs current understanding of relevant policies. • The County will deliver targeted training materials tailored to address identified gaps. • A post-test will be developed, with a minimum passing score of 90%. This approach will allow the County to: • Measure knowledge gained through the training • Track training completion, identify staff who have or have not completed the training • Ensure consistent understanding and application of policy across the team Staff who do not achieve the required score will receive additional refresher training to reinforce key concepts and ensure compliance. Responsible lndividual(s): Staphon Snelling (Training and Development Manager), Danisa Concepion, and Donnie Munson (Quality and Training Supervisors), and Sr. Quality and Training Specialists (Medicaid). Anticipated Completion Date: March 31, 2026
The administrative assistant will prepare the "claims summary" forms by obtaining the number of meals served directly from the "Meal Count Edit Form." The Treasurer or Superintendent will also review the "claims summary" forms and supporting documentation for accuracy prior to the electronic submiss...
The administrative assistant will prepare the "claims summary" forms by obtaining the number of meals served directly from the "Meal Count Edit Form." The Treasurer or Superintendent will also review the "claims summary" forms and supporting documentation for accuracy prior to the electronic submissions. Corresponding documents will be manually signed and dated to indicate approval.
2025-004 Distance Learning and Telemedicine – ALN No. 10.855 Internal Controls over Compliance: Recommendation: We recommend that the District’s established cash management policy is followed to ensure timely disbursement of advanced grant funds, and advances of funds are requested to correspond wit...
2025-004 Distance Learning and Telemedicine – ALN No. 10.855 Internal Controls over Compliance: Recommendation: We recommend that the District’s established cash management policy is followed to ensure timely disbursement of advanced grant funds, and advances of funds are requested to correspond with anticipated payment of invoices. Action Taken: Management agrees with the recommendations. The cash management policy will be followed, and request of funds will be timed to correspond with the anticipated payment of invoices. Proposed Completion Date: March 31, 2026
Finding 2025-003 Federal Agency Name: U.S. Department of Education Program Name: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Financial Assistance Listing: 84.007, 84.033, 84.063, 84.268 Finding Summary: In testing of 60 students, 1 student was identified that was notified of the requirement to retu...
Finding 2025-003 Federal Agency Name: U.S. Department of Education Program Name: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Financial Assistance Listing: 84.007, 84.033, 84.063, 84.268 Finding Summary: In testing of 60 students, 1 student was identified that was notified of the requirement to return Title IV funds in excess of the amount actually required to be returned. The error was caught by the District, but the student’s account was never corrected to the appropriate amount of the return. Corrective Action Plan: The corrective action for the R2T4 calculation error involved promptly correcting the student's calculation and returning the appropriate funds. To prevent future mistakes, the Director of Financial Aid will review the current R2T4 controls process with staff, which now includes a double review by the Financial Aid Adviser and the Director to catch errors such as typos or miscalculations and to ensure accurate student notifications. After aid adjustments are made, the Director verifies the processed changes for accuracy, and any discovered errors are immediately corrected and documented in the R2T4 file. Responsible Individual(s): Christopher Natelborg Anticipated Completion Date: September 2025
Finding 2025-002 Federal Agency Name: U.S. Department of Education Program Name: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Financial Assistance Listing: 84.007, 84.033, 84.063, 84.268 Finding Summary: In testing of 60 students, 1 student was identified who was not awarded the correct amount of Pe...
Finding 2025-002 Federal Agency Name: U.S. Department of Education Program Name: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Financial Assistance Listing: 84.007, 84.033, 84.063, 84.268 Finding Summary: In testing of 60 students, 1 student was identified who was not awarded the correct amount of Pell. Corrective Action Plan: The corrective action for the Pell Grant eligibility issue involved promptly adjusting the affected student's Pell Grant to the correct amount, which resulted in an increase and ensured there was no negative impact. To address the root cause, the Director of Financial Aid met with the financial aid team to review the finding and clarified federal regulations on Pell Grant calculations, referencing the 2024-25 FSA Handbook. Importantly, the Director committed to upgrading the internal Pell Grant calculator used by Financial Aid Advisers: this enhancement will add a flagging mechanism that automatically alerts advisers whenever a student's calculated Pell Grant amount falls below the published minimum Pell amount for that award year, thereby ensuring that no student unintentionally receives an ineligible or reduced Pell Grant due to a calculation oversight. Responsible Individual(s): Christopher Natelborg Anticipated Completion Date: January 2026
Finding 2025-001 Federal Agency Name: U.S. Department of Education Program Name: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Financial Assistance Listing: 84.007, 84.033, 84.063, 84.268 Finding Summary: In testing of 60 students, 3 students did not receive a timely notification of their award from ...
Finding 2025-001 Federal Agency Name: U.S. Department of Education Program Name: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Financial Assistance Listing: 84.007, 84.033, 84.063, 84.268 Finding Summary: In testing of 60 students, 3 students did not receive a timely notification of their award from the District. Corrective Action Plan: To address missed disbursement notifications, the Financial Aid team identified affected students and sent the required notices, including an official explanation from the Director of Financial Aid. The issue was traced to a system malfunction during the SU24 term, which has since been resolved by implementing a process that alerts IT and the Director if notification counts do not match disbursement records. The notification script has been enhanced to track missing letters over the previous 30 days, and IT has established a weekly audit comparing sent notifications to disbursement records for accuracy. Additionally, coding updates in the CX system now ensure all disbursements are properly captured, regardless of the date entered by Financial Aid, thereby preventing similar oversights in the future. Responsible Individual(s): Christopher Natelborg Anticipated Completion Date: December 2025
Finding 2025-002 – Internal Control over Compliance – Reporting (Significant Deficiency) CFDA Title and Number 84.354A Qualified Zone Academy Bonds (QZAB) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Compliance/Internal Control over Compliance: Auditee Responsibilities - 87 - Criteria: Unifo...
Finding 2025-002 – Internal Control over Compliance – Reporting (Significant Deficiency) CFDA Title and Number 84.354A Qualified Zone Academy Bonds (QZAB) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Compliance/Internal Control over Compliance: Auditee Responsibilities - 87 - Criteria: Uniform Guidance CFR Part 200.303 requires entities to maintain effective internal control over compliance for federal programs, including accurate financial reporting. GAAP requires proper recognition and disclosure of long-term obligations such as Qualified Zone Academy Bonds (QZAB). In-ternal controls should ensure debt balances are reconciled to lender statements and amortization schedules to prevent misstatement in reports and the SEFA. Condition: Myrtle Point School District No. did not perform routine reconciliations of QZAB debt bal-ances during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. The general ledger balance for QZAB differed from the amortization schedule and accrued interest was not updated. No documented review or reconciliation was performed. Failed to report the interest for the QZAB bonds and failed to post the principal pay-ments that were paid from the QZAB for the Flex fund. Entries were required to correct this deficiency in order to complete the audit. Cause: Lack of formal reconciliation procedures and oversight; reliance on outdated schedules without updates. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to accurately reconcile QZAB balances or amortization records, can result in a risk of material misstatement of liabilities and interest expense for the financial statements; po-tential errors in SEFA reporting when QZAB financed federally funded assets. This could lead to non-compliance with reporting requirements and misclassification of debt-financed assets. Questioned Cost: None reported Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that Myrtle Point School District No. 41 implement a monthly recon-ciliation process for QZAB debt, agreeing general ledger balances to lender statements and amortization schedules, and require documented review and sign-off by the Director of Business Services. District's Response: The District concurs with the recommendation. Corrective Action Plan: The District will implement reconciliations and update the schedules, and inte-grate review into the year-end close process. Planned Implementation Date: January 31, 2026 Responsible Person: Director of Business Services, Myrtle Point School District No. 41
Finding 2025-002 - Procurement (Significant Deficiency) CFDA Title and Number: 20.513 (5310) Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with Disabilities. Name of Federal Agency: Department of Transportation Internal Control over Compliance: Procurement CFDA Title and Number: 20.509 (5311) Operating...
Finding 2025-002 - Procurement (Significant Deficiency) CFDA Title and Number: 20.513 (5310) Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with Disabilities. Name of Federal Agency: Department of Transportation Internal Control over Compliance: Procurement CFDA Title and Number: 20.509 (5311) Operating Assistance. Formula Grants for Rural. Name of Federal Agency: Department of Transportation Internal Control over Compliance: Procurement Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200.318(a-k) Numerous procurement regulations exist requiring federal grant awardees to develop and implement internal control policies and procedures related to procurement activities. Condition: The District made expenditures and engaged in contracts without following relevant procurement requirements. Cause: Management and leadership lacked awareness of relevant procurement regulations. Consequently, no internal control policies or procedures related to procurement existed, or policies and procedures existed but were not implemented. Effect or Potential Effect: The lack of effective internal controls over procurement activities had allowed for widespread deficiencies and noncompliant activities, which resulted in the District’s revocation of one award. Questioned Cost: None reported Context: Without proper procurement policies and procedures, the risk of compliance requirement violations is significant. The District failed to meet numerous procurement requirements early in the fiscal year and ultimately lost a significant award for bus acquisitions. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: Yes Recommendation: The District should design and implement internal controls related to procurement regulations that will reduce the risk that the District’s procurement activities are not in compliance with federal regulations. District's Response: The District acknowledges the weaknesses and its intention of correcting weaknesses. There has been a change in the General Manager position, to improve the operations, and training of all management, staffing and leadership. The Board has had significant membership change, with new leadership actively engaged in creating a quality internal control and policy environment. Much education and training has occurred during and after fiscal year 2024-2025, up through December 2025, and is ongoing, to meet these goals. Corrective Action Plan: The District acknowledges the weaknesses and its intention of correcting weaknesses. There has been a change in the General Manager position, to improve the operations, and training of all management, staffing and leadership. The Board has had significant membership change, with new leadership actively engaged in creating a quality internal control and policy environment. Much education and training has occurred during and after fiscal year 2024-2025, up through December 2025, and is ongoing, to meet these goals. Planned Implementation Date: December 31, 2025 Responsible Persons: District Board, Umpqua Public Transit District
« 1 5 6 8 9 685 »