Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
59,889
In database
Filtered Results
19,589
Matching current filters
Showing Page
34 of 784
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Single Audit Finding No. 2025-067 - DOTPF’s statewide value engineering (VE) coordinator omitted one project with a VE analysis in the FFY 2025 annual VE summary report submitted to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagre...
Single Audit Finding No. 2025-067 - DOTPF’s statewide value engineering (VE) coordinator omitted one project with a VE analysis in the FFY 2025 annual VE summary report submitted to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with this finding and recommendation. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The department has implemented additional controls and training necessary to ensure compliance. Current procedures have proven adequate as demonstrated during the audit period, but adherence to procedures for reporting necessitates additional training. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): June 30, 2026 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Michael White, Financial Services Manager
Single Audit Finding No. 2025-066 - Contractor certified payrolls for four of 11 construction projects tested were not submitted during FY25. Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees w...
Single Audit Finding No. 2025-066 - Contractor certified payrolls for four of 11 construction projects tested were not submitted during FY25. Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with this finding and recommendation. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The department will implement measures to follow up with contractors and document attempts to contact businesses. Management will provide additional staff training regarding processes and procedures to ensure that the department is following up with due diligence. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): December 31, 2026 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Michael White, Financial Services Manager
Finding: 2025-042 - Two of four randomly selected FY 25 PCSRT SF-425 federal financial reports tested did not include the recipient share of expenditures. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 11.438 Assistance Listing Title: PCSRT Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agenc...
Finding: 2025-042 - Two of four randomly selected FY 25 PCSRT SF-425 federal financial reports tested did not include the recipient share of expenditures. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 11.438 Assistance Listing Title: PCSRT Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): ADFG respectfully disagrees with the audit finding regarding SF-425 reporting and recipient share. During the audit period, the federal awarding agency transitioned to a new reporting system but did not issue updated written instructions, revised award terms, or formal guidance clarifying new SF-425 fields or reporting expectations. Under 2 CFR §200.328, recipients are required to submit financial reports as specified in the Federal award, and agencies may require only 0MB-approved, government-wide data elements. No updated award terms or instructions were provided to ADFG during this transition. System behavior clearly indicated that certain fields were not applicable. In Grants Online, the fields were grayed out, signaling they were not required. In contrast, eRA Commons left these fields open without any explanation or guidance. NOAA now requires these fields, but this requirement was not communicated at the time of the transition. This inconsistency demonstrates that the agency had not finalized or communicated enforceable requirements for these fields during the reporting period. DFG acted reasonably and consistently based on the information available. It would be inappropriate to penalize DFG for continuing to report under prior requirements or omitting data in fields that were not previously required. The Uniform Guidance places responsibility on awarding agencies to provide clear written guidance, transition timelines, and clarification on new reporting requirements before they become enforceable. For these reasons, DFG requests that this finding be reconsidered. Our reporting complied with the award terms and the system instructions available at the time, and any changes introduced by the agency were not formally communicated or incorporated into our award during the relevant reporting period. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): We will contact the awarding agency to confirm whether previously submitted reports must be revised to include the recipient share. We will also verify if this requirement applies only to future reporting and adjust our procedures accordingly. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): April 30, 2026 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Jessica Hood, Accountant 5
Finding: 2025-041 - One of six Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Pacific Salmon Treaty (PCSRT) Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reports tested was not submitted timely. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 11.438 Assistance Listing Title: PCSRT Views of Responsibl...
Finding: 2025-041 - One of six Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Pacific Salmon Treaty (PCSRT) Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reports tested was not submitted timely. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 11.438 Assistance Listing Title: PCSRT Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): Alaska Department of Fish & Game (ADFG) disagrees with this finding. The FFATA report for the FY2025 NOAA subaward was submitted one month late due to resource constraints while our team was actively implementing a corrective action plan (CAP) for a prior Office of Inspector General (OIG) federal audit finding related to FFATA reporting timeliness. During this period, we prioritized fulfilling the CAP requirements, which included a comprehensive reconciliation of all subawards across federal programs to ensure accuracy and compliance. This intensive remediation effort temporarily impacted our ability to meet standard reporting timelines. The delay was not the result of a new or separate control failure, but rather a timing issue directly tied to the corrective work already underway. Importantly: • The NOAA FFATA report was completed accurately as part of the same remediation workflow. • The delay occurred while addressing the previously identified issue and was resolved within the corrective action period established with the 01G. • The root cause was the same issue identified in the existing finding, and not a new or systemic breakdown. • Updated internal controls and revised procedures were implemented during this period and now apply uniformly across all programs, including NOAA. • These corrective actions have resulted in timely, comprehensive, and fully implemented processes designed to prevent recurrence. Given that the late NOAA FFATA report occurred within the active corrective action window and was resolved through the same documented process, we view this as part of the previously identified issue rather than a separate instance of noncompliance. The corrective actions were completed as planned and have strengthened our reporting controls to ensure ongoing compliance. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): ADFG has implemented formal policies and procedures to ensure timely processing and submission of FFATA reports, fully addressing the previous OIG audit finding. These procedures are now in place and actively followed, and ongoing monitoring has been established to verify continued compliance and prevent recurrence. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): Completed April 15, 2025 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Jessica Hood, Accountant 5
Finding: 2025-076 - The Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority’s (AIDEA) controls were not designed to detect noncompliance in program income reported in AIDEA’s annual report. During our testing of reports, we noted that the annual report tested did not report interest earned on deposit...
Finding: 2025-076 - The Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority’s (AIDEA) controls were not designed to detect noncompliance in program income reported in AIDEA’s annual report. During our testing of reports, we noted that the annual report tested did not report interest earned on deposit accounts. The amount of interest income not included on the annual report totaled 167,023, which represents the cumulative interest income earned for the program from deposits since inception Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 11.307 Assistance Listing Title: Economic Development Cluster COVID- 19 Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): Agree Corrective Action (corrective action planned): DCCED manages this program on behalf of AIDEA. DCCED will incorporate a new internal control procedure requiring that each year’s final EDA-209 report be reviewed and approved by AIDEA’s Controller or Chief Financial Officer prior to submission and includes backup that supports each number. This review step will ensure the completeness and accuracy of all future filings. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): 06/30/2026 (or the date of when the next EAD-209 report is due) Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): jkornmuller@aidea.orq, aleavitt@aidea.orq, andy.macaulay@alaska.qov
Medicaid Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 93.778 Recommendation: The District should design and implement controls to ensure amounts reported are supported by expenditure of the District for eligible activities and positions. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement w...
Medicaid Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 93.778 Recommendation: The District should design and implement controls to ensure amounts reported are supported by expenditure of the District for eligible activities and positions. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The District will develop and implement internal controls to review personnel position indicators included in the quarterly Medicaid Cost Reporting against HR records to validate the position indicators are accurate as of the time of the submission and make corrections, as appropriate. This will ensure that all position-related expenditures included within the Medicaid Cost Reporting are eligible and supported when submitting claims to PCG. Further, the District will ensure that all appropriate supporting documentation, calculations, and workbooks that were utilized to prepare the claim are appropriately reviewed by management, agreed to supporting documentation, and appropriately retained as part of the internal controls. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Accounting Director (Deputy CFO), Financial Reporting Manager, Director of Human Resources Data & Strategy Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 6/30/2026
Medicaid Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 93.778 Recommendation: The District should design and implement controls to ensure required authorization to bill Medicare (Form M-5) is obtained prior to initial billing. We also recommend the District design and implement controls to ensure a copy of this ...
Medicaid Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 93.778 Recommendation: The District should design and implement controls to ensure required authorization to bill Medicare (Form M-5) is obtained prior to initial billing. We also recommend the District design and implement controls to ensure a copy of this form is retained in accordance with Federal and State requirements and is available for future required reviews. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The District will strengthen internal controls to ensure all required authorizations are obtained and properly maintained prior to billing. MPS will accomplish this through the execution of the following: • Implementing a pre-billing verification process to confirm a completed Form M-5 is on file before any initial Medicaid billing occurs, • Establishing a standardized documentation procedure to ensure all Forms M-5 are securely retained and readily accessible for review, • Creating a centralized tracking system to monitor the status of required authorizations for all eligible students, • Conducting periodic internal reviews to ensure compliance with authorization and documentation requirements, • Providing training to relevant staff on Medicaid billing requirements and record retention expectations. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Budget Director, Accounting Director (Deputy CFO), Financial Reporting Manager Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Implementation of the new process is currently underway and will be remediated in the coming months of FY26 and into FY27.
Special Education Cluster (IDEA programs) – Assistance Listing No. 84.027, 84.170 Recommendation: The District should implement controls that allow for the identification and proper classification of vendor payments to applicable grant period. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is...
Special Education Cluster (IDEA programs) – Assistance Listing No. 84.027, 84.170 Recommendation: The District should implement controls that allow for the identification and proper classification of vendor payments to applicable grant period. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The District will strengthen internal controls to ensure that vendor payments are appropriately aligned with the correct grant reporting period. MPS will implement a standardized review process to validate that vendor invoices and related purchase orders are coded to the correct grant period, establish clear procedures for identifying the period of performance for goods and services, enhance coordination between program and finance staff to validate the timing and allowability of expenditures, conduct periodic monitoring of vendor payments to ensure compliance with grant period requirements, and provide training to relevant staff relating to grant period compliance and expenditure classification. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Senior Director of Specialized Services, Accounting Director (Deputy CFO), Financial Reporting Manager Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 6/30/2026
a. Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation During the year ended December 31, 2025, management withdrew $3,169 from the replacement reserve account without HUD approval. b. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding On 03.04.2026, management corrected this issue by depositing $3,169 into the ...
a. Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation During the year ended December 31, 2025, management withdrew $3,169 from the replacement reserve account without HUD approval. b. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding On 03.04.2026, management corrected this issue by depositing $3,169 into the replacement reserve account. Furthermore, management has implemented a strengthened internal control process requiring a three-level review and approval of all replacement reserve withdrawals. Specifically, the Vice President of Operations, Regional Manager, and Controller must each review and approve the request prior to any transfer of funds to ensure compliance with HUD approved withdrawals.
The District continues to review duties and procedures throughout all fiscal services to improve segregation of duty procedures. We are implementing procedures to ensure additional oversight in areas such as cash handling, recordkeeping and financial reporting. These procedures include ensuring that...
The District continues to review duties and procedures throughout all fiscal services to improve segregation of duty procedures. We are implementing procedures to ensure additional oversight in areas such as cash handling, recordkeeping and financial reporting. These procedures include ensuring that all journal entries, cash receipt entry, check batches, and balancing procedures are reviewed/edited by more than one person at Central Office.
Period of Performance – Assistance Listing No. 93.958 Recommendation: Management should review and revise its process for allocating costs to federal grants to include additional layers of review and so that costs for which some or all are from outside of the period of performance, may be appropriat...
Period of Performance – Assistance Listing No. 93.958 Recommendation: Management should review and revise its process for allocating costs to federal grants to include additional layers of review and so that costs for which some or all are from outside of the period of performance, may be appropriately excluded from the federal grant. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Management will revise cost allocation procedures to add program and finance review steps to ensure that only costs incurred within the applicable period of performance are charged to federal grants. Costs identified as outside the allowable period will be excluded or reclassified. Updated procedures will be communicated to relevant staff and monitored for compliance. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: George Pepe Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 6/30/2026
Special Tests and Provisions – Assistance Listing No. 14.267 Recommendation: We recommend program managers verify that rent reasonableness checklists and certifications are fully completed by HUD staff. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. ...
Special Tests and Provisions – Assistance Listing No. 14.267 Recommendation: We recommend program managers verify that rent reasonableness checklists and certifications are fully completed by HUD staff. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Management will implement a supervisory review process requiring program managers to review and formally sign off on rent reasonableness checklists and certifications. Staff will receive refresher training on completion requirements, and management will periodically review files to ensure documentation is complete and properly approved. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Jamie Rotter Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 6/30/2026
Suspension and Debarment – Assistance Listing No. 14.267 Recommendation: We recommend that the organization retain documentation that Sam.gov was used to verify that a vendor was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction prior to contract. To the extent pra...
Suspension and Debarment – Assistance Listing No. 14.267 Recommendation: We recommend that the organization retain documentation that Sam.gov was used to verify that a vendor was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction prior to contract. To the extent practicable, the organization can engage with a third party that will verify any new and existing vendors have not been suspended or debarred on a monthly basis. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Management will update procurement procedures to require documented SAM.gov verification for all new vendors prior to contract execution and periodically for existing vendors. Evidence of verification (e.g., screenshots or confirmation reports) will be retained in procurement files. Management will also evaluate engaging a third‑party service to perform monthly suspension and debarment screenings. Compliance will be reviewed as part of routine procurement oversight. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Scott Russell Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 6/30/2026
Condition: The CMHSP included all contract costs, including amounts over $25,000 in the modified total direct costs. Corrective Action: Those involved in managing and reporting for the grant will review the approved budget to ensure understanding of what has been approved by SAMHSA. Prior to request...
Condition: The CMHSP included all contract costs, including amounts over $25,000 in the modified total direct costs. Corrective Action: Those involved in managing and reporting for the grant will review the approved budget to ensure understanding of what has been approved by SAMHSA. Prior to requesting funds each month, accounting assistant and chief operating officer will review total costs to date to ensure they are accounted properly in line with modified total direct costs. At year end, a final check will occur to ensure all costs are reported according to modified total direct costs methodology. Staff responsible: Kristyn Kostelec, Grant Manager, Karen Watson, Accounting Assistant, and Kelly Jenkins, Chief Operating Officer Anticipated completion date: 12/30/26
Condition: Expenditures charged to the grant were not authorized in the grant budget. Corrective Action: Each month, the grant manager and accounting assistant will review the items charged to the grant in detail to ensure that all charges are appropriately accounted for according to the grant manag...
Condition: Expenditures charged to the grant were not authorized in the grant budget. Corrective Action: Each month, the grant manager and accounting assistant will review the items charged to the grant in detail to ensure that all charges are appropriately accounted for according to the grant manager's direction and approved grant budget. Staff responsible: Kristyn Kostelec, Grant Manager and Karen Watson, Accounting Assistant Anticipated completion date: 6/30/26
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management Response: Management concurs with the finding. The hazard insurance policy for the project property was in force; however, due to an administrative oversight during policy renewal, the required standard mortgagee clause identi...
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management Response: Management concurs with the finding. The hazard insurance policy for the project property was in force; however, due to an administrative oversight during policy renewal, the required standard mortgagee clause identifying the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as mortgagee/loss payee was not reflected in the insurance documentation maintained on file. Corrective Action Plan: Management will work with the insurance broker to obtain the required endorsement naming the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as mortgagee/loss payee and will implement a review process to ensure required endorsements are verified upon future policy renewals. Responsible Official: Stacey Ninness, President/CEO Anticipated Completion Date: Management anticipates the policy endorsement will be completed within 60 days of the audit report date.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management Response: Management concurs with the finding. In prior years, the Single Audit Reporting Package was not submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse due to an internal misunderstanding of management’s responsibility for subm...
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management Response: Management concurs with the finding. In prior years, the Single Audit Reporting Package was not submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse due to an internal misunderstanding of management’s responsibility for submission. With the engagement of a new audit firm, management has clarified these responsibilities. Corrective Action Plan: Management will formally designate responsibility for the timely submission of the Single Audit Reporting Package to a specific member of the finance department. In addition, management will implement a review process to confirm submission and receipt acknowledgment from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. Responsible Official: Kimberly Burt, Chief Financial Officer Anticipated Completion Date: Management anticipates the filing will be completed within 30 days of the audit report date.
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Assistance Listing No. 21.027 Recommendation: The Organization should ensure proper review and approval over expenditures. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to ...
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Assistance Listing No. 21.027 Recommendation: The Organization should ensure proper review and approval over expenditures. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: YSS engaged a project manager in September 2023 to provide oversight on the two major construction projects taking place, Rooftop Gardens and Ember Campus. The project manager reviews the work being performed to ensure alignment with the progress billing on the monthly AIA pay applications. The project manager submits the invoice for approval to the CFO who, with the CEO, approves payment and the invoice is sent YSS accounts payable to processes payment. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Danielle Fineran Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2026
Finding 2025 – 001 Audit Journal Entries Condition: During audit fieldwork, our testing resulted in audit adjustments in order to present materially accurate financial statements on grant activities. Criteria: A good system of internal controls would provide for accurate recording of adjusted grant ...
Finding 2025 – 001 Audit Journal Entries Condition: During audit fieldwork, our testing resulted in audit adjustments in order to present materially accurate financial statements on grant activities. Criteria: A good system of internal controls would provide for accurate recording of adjusted grant receivables and revenues for all Organization grant accounts prior to audit fieldwork. Cause: Year-end entries related to grant receivables and revenues were required in order to accurately present the Organization’s financial statements. Effect: The Organization’s financial statements were not fully adjusted prior to audit fieldwork. Recommendation: A vital process of effective internal controls is the review and subsequent adjustment of all general ledger balances, including grant activity. This review and adjustment will aid in the appropriate budgeting and management of the Organization’s financial activities and resources related to grant programs. Corrective Action Plan: The Fiscal Manager, along with staff, will review year-end adjustments as part of the audit preparation process and work to reduce the number of entries proposed by the auditors and prepare fully adjusted financial statements prior to audit fieldwork.
March 23, 2026 CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Cognizant or Oversight Agency for Audit Trinity Academy for the Performing Arts respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2025 Name and address of independent public accounting firm: AAFCPAs 160 Federal Street, 16th Fl...
March 23, 2026 CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Cognizant or Oversight Agency for Audit Trinity Academy for the Performing Arts respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2025 Name and address of independent public accounting firm: AAFCPAs 160 Federal Street, 16th Floor Boston, MA 02110 Audit period: July 1, 2024, thru June 30, 2025 The findings from June 30, 2025, schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. FINDINGS - FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT FINDINGS SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY 2025-001 Payroll Recommendation: The School implements a standardized checklist and conducts periodic internal reviews of onboarding documentation to ensure all required forms are properly completed and retained in accordance with Federal Regulations. Action Taken: The School is implementing a standardized onboarding checklist; all personnel folders will now include a printed version to ensure required forms, including Form 1-9 and Form W-4, are completed in full at the time of hire. In addition, periodic internal review of personnel files are completed in full at the time of hire. In addition, periodic internal reviews of personnel files will be conducted to verify ongoing compliance. HR staff will also receive additional training to reinforce proper documentation procedures and retention requirements. We are committed to strengthening internal controls and ensuring full compliance moving forward. If there are any questions regarding this plan, please call Harold Sands at 401-432-7881. Sincerely yours, Harold Sands
March 23, 2026 CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Cognizant or Oversight Agency for Audit Trinity Academy for the Performing Arts respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2025 Name and address of independent public accounting firm: AAFCPAs 160 Federal Street, 16th Fl...
March 23, 2026 CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Cognizant or Oversight Agency for Audit Trinity Academy for the Performing Arts respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2025 Name and address of independent public accounting firm: AAFCPAs 160 Federal Street, 16th Floor Boston, MA 02110 Audit period: July 1, 2024, thru June 30, 2025 The findings from June 30, 2025, schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. FINDINGS-FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS AUDITS SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Revenue Recognition 2025-002 Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Funds Recommendation: The School develop policies and procedures surrounding revenue recognition. These procedures should also include a reconciliation of expenses incurred versus revenue recognized, ensuring revenue is recognized when services are rendered and the provisions of the grants have been met. Action Taken: Revenue recognition issues that occurred in the fiscal year 2024 audit flowed through to fiscal year 2025 and were not caught in time for the fiscal year 2025 audit. The School continues to adhere to the matching policy. If there are any questions regarding this plan, please call Harold Sands at 401-432-7881. Sincerely yours, Harold Sands
United Way will ensure all disbursements related to major program are allowable.
United Way will ensure all disbursements related to major program are allowable.
2025-004 REPORTING Program: Impact Aid Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.041 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Material Noncompliance Compliance Requirement: L. Reporting Condition/Context: Documentatio...
2025-004 REPORTING Program: Impact Aid Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.041 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Questioned Costs: None Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Material Noncompliance Compliance Requirement: L. Reporting Condition/Context: Documentation was not provided to support the number of federally connected students reported on the Impact Aid application. Criteria: The District’s policies and procedures should ensure that internal controls over compliance of federal programs are in place and operating effectively. Cause: Management oversight and turnover in the federal grant department. Effect: Internal control weakness and material noncompliance. Recommendation: We recommend the District review its internal control procedures over federal programs to ensure that proper documentation is maintained to support the number of federallyconnected students on the Impact Aid application. Repeat Finding: Yes, similar to prior year finding 2024-005. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with this finding. See the corrective action plan. Contact person: Laticia John, Business Coordinator
We agree with the recommendations and will separate duties and obtain training to the extent possible with our available resources. Ther superintendent and board will continue to monitor duties performed by the administrative personnel and contract for professional assistance as necessary.
We agree with the recommendations and will separate duties and obtain training to the extent possible with our available resources. Ther superintendent and board will continue to monitor duties performed by the administrative personnel and contract for professional assistance as necessary.
The District continues to have a limited number of office employees. The District will attempt, with advice from the auditors, to segregate duties as much as reasonably possible with limited office personnel.
The District continues to have a limited number of office employees. The District will attempt, with advice from the auditors, to segregate duties as much as reasonably possible with limited office personnel.
« 1 32 33 35 36 784 »