Audit 377852

FY End
2024-12-31
Total Expended
$1.78M
Findings
6
Programs
2
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-12-29

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1166733 2024-006 Material Weakness Yes AB
1166734 2024-007 Material Weakness Yes AB
1166735 2024-008 Material Weakness Yes C
1166736 2024-009 Material Weakness Yes E
1166737 2024-010 Material Weakness Yes C
1166738 2024-011 Material Weakness Yes L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
64.035 VETERANS TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM $1.08M Yes 6
64.055 STAFF SERGEANT PARKER GORDON FOX SUICIDE PREVENTION GRANT PROGRAM $699,209 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
NU5EUXJV31G1 Robert Wood Auditee
4063955610 Roby Thomas Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the "Schedule") presents the activity of all the programs of Great Plains Veterans Services Center (the "Center") over which the Center exercised direct operating control for the year ended December 31, 2024. All federal awards received during the year ended December 31, 2024, from federal agencies are included in this Schedule.
The accompanying Schedule is presented using the accrual basis of accounting. The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Therefore, some amounts presented in this Schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements.
The center used a de-minimus rate of ten percent with the grantors for this program.

Finding Details

Section III – Major Federal Awards Programs – Findings and Questioned Costs Finding 2024-006: Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Allowable Costs - Inadequate Chart of Accounts Segregation for Unallowable Costs (Material Weakness) Federal Program : Grants for Transportation of Veterans in Highly Rural Areas Assistance Listing Number : 64.035 Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.302(b)(3), non-Federal entities must maintain records that adequately identify the source and application of funds and must segregate unallowable costs to ensure compliance with cost principles. Condition: The chart of accounts does not sufficiently segregate unallowable costs from allowable program expenditures. Certain unallowable expenditures were coded to general operating accounts without clear differentiation. Cause: The Center lacks a detailed coding structure and written policies requiring explicit identification and segregation of unallowable costs. Effect: There is increased risk that unallowable costs could be charged to Federal awards, leading to potential noncompliance, questioned costs, or improper reimbursement requests. Recommendation: Management should implement a revised chart of accounts that clearly differentiates allowable vs. unallowable costs, supported by updated written policies and staff training. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding.
Section III – Major Federal Awards Programs – Findings and Questioned Costs (Cont.) Finding 2024-007: Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Allowable Costs - Insufficient Budget-to-Actual Reviews (Material Weakness) Federal Program : Grants for Transportation of Veterans in Highly Rural Areas Assistance Listing Number : 64.035 Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.302(b)(5) and established internal control frameworks such as COSO, entities must compare actual expenditures to budgeted amounts to ensure proper financial management and compliance with award terms. Condition: Budget-to-actual analyses were not consistently performed or documented for certain Federal programs. Cause: The Center lacks a formalized review schedule and adequate documentation procedures. Effect: Failure to identify variances may result in overspending, underspending, or misclassification of Federal program costs. Recommendation: Management should implement formal, periodic budget-to-actual reviews supported by standardized documentation requirements. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding.
Section III – Major Federal Awards Programs – Findings and Questioned Costs (Cont.) Finding 2024-008: Cash Management - Inadequate Authorization and Supporting Documentation for Reimbursement Requests (Material Weakness) Federal Program : Grants for Transportation of Veterans in Highly Rural Areas Assistance Listing Number : 64.035 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.415(a) requires that financial reports and reimbursement requests be certified as accurate and complete. Strong internal controls require appropriate documentation supporting all drawdown requests. Condition: Reimbursement requests lacked evidence of supervisory approval and did not consistently include required supporting documentation. Cause: A standardized approval workflow for reimbursement and drawdown requests has not been established. Effect: Inadequate documentation increases the risk of inaccurate reimbursement requests, which may result in disallowed costs or repayment obligations. Recommendation: Management should develop and implement a formal approval process requiring supervisor sign-off and attachment of all required supporting documentation prior to submission. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding.
Section III – Major Federal Awards Programs – Findings and Questioned Costs (Cont.) Finding 2024-009: Eligibility - Lack of Segregation of Duties in Expenditure Determination and Approval (Material Weakness) Federal Program : Grants for Transportation of Veterans in Highly Rural Areas Assistance Listing Number : 64.035 Criteria: As per 2 CFR 200.303(a), entities must maintain effective internal controls, including segregation of duties, to prevent unauthorized or inaccurate transactions. Condition: The same individual was responsible for determining expenditure allowability and approving expenditures for reimbursement. Cause: Staffing limitations and the absence of written policies resulting in inadequate role separation. Effect: Insufficient segregation of duties increases the risk of errors or inappropriate expenditures. Recommendation: Management should reassign roles so that expenditure allowability reviews and expenditure approvals are performed by separate individuals. If staffing is limited, implement compensating management review controls. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding.
Section III – Major Federal Awards Programs – Findings and Questioned Costs (Cont.) Finding 2024-010: Cash Management - Inadequate Policies for Drawdowns, Program Income, and Reconciliations (Material Weakness) Federal Program : Grants for Transportation of Veterans in Highly Rural Areas Assistance Listing Number : 64.035 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305 requires documented procedures for cash management, including drawdowns, program income usage, and reconciliation processes. Condition: The Center does not have comprehensive written policies governing drawdowns, program income application, and required reconciliations. Cause: Noncompliance with Federal cash management and program income requirements may result in questioned costs or delayed reimbursements. Effect: Late submission constitutes noncompliance with federal regulations and may delay future federal funding or result in additional oversight. Recommendation: Management should develop and adopt formal written policies detailing drawdown procedures, program income usage, and reconciliation requirements. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding.
Section III – Major Federal Awards Programs – Findings and Questioned Costs (Cont.) Finding 2024-011: Reporting - Insufficient Policies to Ensure Completeness and Accuracy of Reports (Material Weakness) Federal Program : Grants for Transportation of Veterans in Highly Rural Areas Assistance Listing Number : 64.035 Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.328 and 200.302(b)(2), entities must maintain internal controls to ensure that financial and performance reports are accurate, complete, and supported by appropriate documentation. Condition: Reports submitted for Federal awards were not consistently reviewed for accuracy, and review procedures were not documented. Cause: The Center lacks a formal reporting policy and does not have a documented review process in place. Effect: There is an increased risk of inaccurate reporting to Federal awarding agencies, which may impact funding decisions and compliance status. Recommendation: Management should establish a formal reporting policy requiring documented supervisory reviews prior to the submission of financial and performance reports. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding.