Finding 610188 (2022-003)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
I
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2022
Accepted
2023-03-07
Audit: 29668
Organization: Clay Community Schools (IN)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The School Corporation lacks an effective internal control system for procurement, leading to repeated noncompliance with federal regulations.
  • Impacted Requirements: Failure to follow procurement procedures, including obtaining necessary price quotes and documenting procurement history, violates 2 CFR 200.303 and 200.318.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Management should implement a robust internal control system to ensure compliance with grant agreements and procurement requirements to avoid future federal funding risks.

Finding Text

FINDING 2022-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, COVID-19 - School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, COVID-19 - National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 2020-2021, 2021-2022 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediate prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2020-004. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchases were followed. There was no oversight, review, or approval process in place and documented at the School Corporation to ensure proper procedures were followed and price or rate quotations were obtained. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000 per Indiana Code. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes for the six vendors tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000, but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. In addition, contracts were not awarded for two of the six vendors tested with purchases exceeding $50,000. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in ? 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases? (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) . . . if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (d) . . . the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required. . . ." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal control that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal control to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Categories

Procurement, Suspension & Debarment

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 33743 2022-002
    Material Weakness
  • 33744 2022-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 33745 2022-002
    Material Weakness
  • 33746 2022-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 33747 2022-002
    Material Weakness
  • 33748 2022-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 33749 2022-002
    Material Weakness
  • 33750 2022-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 33751 2022-002
    Material Weakness
  • 33752 2022-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 33753 2022-002
    Material Weakness
  • 33754 2022-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 33755 2022-005
    Material Weakness
  • 33756 2022-006
    Material Weakness
  • 33757 2022-005
    Material Weakness
  • 33758 2022-006
    Material Weakness
  • 33759 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 33760 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 33761 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 33762 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 610185 2022-002
    Material Weakness
  • 610186 2022-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 610187 2022-002
    Material Weakness
  • 610189 2022-002
    Material Weakness
  • 610190 2022-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 610191 2022-002
    Material Weakness
  • 610192 2022-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 610193 2022-002
    Material Weakness
  • 610194 2022-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 610195 2022-002
    Material Weakness
  • 610196 2022-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 610197 2022-005
    Material Weakness
  • 610198 2022-006
    Material Weakness
  • 610199 2022-005
    Material Weakness
  • 610200 2022-006
    Material Weakness
  • 610201 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 610202 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 610203 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 610204 2022-004
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
10.555 National School Lunch Program 22 $2.21M
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund 22 $1.58M
84.027 Special Education_grants to States 22 $1.15M
84.027 Special Education_grants to States 21 $1.04M
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies 22 $986,073
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies 21 $720,589
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund 21 $643,282
10.553 School Breakfast Program 22 $639,324
10.555 National School Lunch Program 21 $166,704
84.367 Improving Teacher Quality State Grants 22 $163,058
84.367 Improving Teacher Quality State Grants 21 $67,195
10.553 School Breakfast Program 21 $65,630
84.002 Adult Education - Basic Grants to States 21 $64,205
84.002 Adult Education - Basic Grants to States 22 $59,273
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program 22 $55,292
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program 21 $50,703
84.173 Special Education_preschool Grants 21 $41,011
84.173 Special Education_preschool Grants 22 $34,737
84.048 Career and Technical Education -- Basic Grants to States 21 $27,459
84.048 Career and Technical Education -- Basic Grants to States 22 $21,633
21.019 Coronavirus Relief Fund 21 $2,006
96.001 Social Security_disability Insurance 22 $546
96.001 Social Security_disability Insurance 21 $154