Finding 1057379 (2018-008)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
N
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2018
Accepted
2024-08-12
Audit: 317044
Organization: City of Compton (CA)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The Housing Authority failed to submit the required FASS-PH report, hindering compliance testing for fund transfers and administrative fees.
  • Impacted Requirements: Non-compliance with OMB 2 CFR Part 200, which prohibits using HAP for administrative costs or transferring funds improperly.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement stronger internal controls to ensure timely preparation and submission of the FASS-PH report to avoid future compliance issues.

Finding Text

Criteria: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XI section 4-14.871- 18 states: "The annual contributions contract (ACC) establishes the amounts HUD will provide a public housing agency (PHA) for housing assistance payments (HAP) and administrative fees. HAP may not be used to cover administrative expenses nor may HAP (including restricted net position [RNP]) be loaned, advanced, or transferred to other component units or other programs such as Public and Indian Housing (CFDA 14.850) (24 CFR sections 982.151 and 982.152)." Condition: We were unable to perform compliance testing due to unavailability of the requested FASSPH report. We therefore were unable to determine whether transfers and advances of HCVP funds were properly conducted and whether the Housing Choice Voucher Program's HAP and administrative fee funding were used appropriately. Cause: Lack of internal control over the preparation and submission of the FASS-PH report. Effect or Potential Effect: Use of funds for unallowed costs. The Housing Authority is not in compliance with grant requirements. Questioned Costs: $108,104. $77,542 for professional services and $30,562 in HAP administrative fees over reimbursed to the City. These amounts are based on the OIG audit report dated July 11, 2019. Context: The Housing Authority did not submit the required annual FASS-PH report to HUD, and we therefore were unable to perform the required procedures for the operating transfers and administrative fees compliance component of special tests and provisions of the program. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: 2017-010

Categories

Questioned Costs HUD Housing Programs Special Tests & Provisions Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 480930 2018-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 480931 2018-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 480932 2018-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 480933 2018-004
    Material Weakness
  • 480934 2018-005
    Material Weakness
  • 480935 2018-006
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 480936 2018-007
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 480937 2018-008
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 480938 2018-009
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 480939 2018-010
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1057372 2018-001
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1057373 2018-002
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1057374 2018-003
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1057375 2018-004
    Material Weakness
  • 1057376 2018-005
    Material Weakness
  • 1057377 2018-006
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1057378 2018-007
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 1057380 2018-009
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1057381 2018-010
    Material Weakness Repeat

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $8.17M
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $614,545
14.239 Home Investment Partnership Program $282,232
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/state's Program $12,142
14.231 Emergency Shelter Grants Program $10,091
16.738 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant $6,227