FINDING 2023-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Services Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022, FY2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For one selection in a sample of two, the school corporation did not perform the required suspension and debarment check on the vendor for FY22. For FY23, the school updated their procedures and properly performed the suspension/debarment check. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit. The prior finding number was 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that quotes are obtained as required for procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-003 – PROCUREMENT AND SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT (Repeat Finding of 2022-003) Significant Deficiency Federal Programs: Charter Schools – AL 84.282 Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Criteria 2 CFR 200.318(i) establishes the need to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. 2 CFR 180.300 establishes the responsibilities of participants entering into covered transactions. Condition The Organization lacked sufficient documentation to support the rationale of procurement methods, selection of contract types, contractor selection or rejection, and basis for the contract price. We also noted suspension and debarments requirements were not given consideration prior to entering into these transactions. However, we noted there were adequate invoices to support the purchases. Cause and Effect As described in 2023-001, the Organization has not established a formal process related to federal awards to identify all key compliance requirements and changes in compliance requirements, evaluate risks of noncompliance with these requirements, and respond to such risks of noncompliance through establishing or changing processes and internal controls. Additionally, certain individuals, within a department, responsible for the use of federal funds lacked knowledge of the compliance requirements pertaining to the use of the funds. As a result, they did not comply with requirements for proper procurement or in relation to suspension and debarment. Recommendation We recommend the Organization develop a system of internal controls aligned with the applicable compliance requirements to sufficiently document procurements and to ensure suspension and debarment is considered prior to entering into future covered transactions. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The Organization’s Corrective Action Plan is included on pages 43 and 44.
FINDING 2023-003 – PROCUREMENT AND SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT (Repeat Finding of 2022-003) Significant Deficiency Federal Programs: Charter Schools – AL 84.282 Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Criteria 2 CFR 200.318(i) establishes the need to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. 2 CFR 180.300 establishes the responsibilities of participants entering into covered transactions. Condition The Organization lacked sufficient documentation to support the rationale of procurement methods, selection of contract types, contractor selection or rejection, and basis for the contract price. We also noted suspension and debarments requirements were not given consideration prior to entering into these transactions. However, we noted there were adequate invoices to support the purchases. Cause and Effect As described in 2023-001, the Organization has not established a formal process related to federal awards to identify all key compliance requirements and changes in compliance requirements, evaluate risks of noncompliance with these requirements, and respond to such risks of noncompliance through establishing or changing processes and internal controls. Additionally, certain individuals, within a department, responsible for the use of federal funds lacked knowledge of the compliance requirements pertaining to the use of the funds. As a result, they did not comply with requirements for proper procurement or in relation to suspension and debarment. Recommendation We recommend the Organization develop a system of internal controls aligned with the applicable compliance requirements to sufficiently document procurements and to ensure suspension and debarment is considered prior to entering into future covered transactions. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The Organization’s Corrective Action Plan is included on pages 43 and 44.
2023-001 Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 22GOV0019AA, 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Town of East Hartford, State of Connecticut Office of Workforce Strategy Pass-Through Number: SLFRP0128 Award Period: 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition: The procurement policy of the Organization does not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None Context: We reviewed the procurement policy of the Organization and noted that the policy does not include the essential compliance elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the new procurement standards. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding
2023-001 Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 22GOV0019AA, 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Town of East Hartford, State of Connecticut Office of Workforce Strategy Pass-Through Number: SLFRP0128 Award Period: 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition: The procurement policy of the Organization does not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None Context: We reviewed the procurement policy of the Organization and noted that the policy does not include the essential compliance elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the new procurement standards. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2021 (ARP) Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 23611-048-PN01, 22611-048-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Ripley-Ohio-Dearborn Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 SOUTH RIPLEY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the procurement and the suspension and debarment requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the requirements for small purchases were met for each applicable procured good or service or to ensure that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a covered transaction. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. Two vendors exceeded the small purchase threshold during the audit period. Both vendors were selected for testing. In both cases, the Cooperative had determined the curriculum and materials that were purchased, totaling $109,322, were to be provided by a single source provider; however, they did not have a documented rationale or support for the decision. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, selection of the vendor, and the basis for the price, was not available for audit for either purchase. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with SPED award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMS Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Two covered transactions were identified that equaled or exceeded $25,000. Both transactions, totaling $109,322 were selected for testing. For the noted transactions, the Cooperative did not verify the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to payment due to the Cooperative not having any policies or procedures in place to verify that contractors were neither suspended nor debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to fiscal year 2022-2023 and the 23611-048-PN01 and 22611-048-ARP grants. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SOUTH RIPLEY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures , consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (1) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . " 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 SOUTH RIPLEY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, adequate documentation was not retained for procurements that fell within the small purchase threshold and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were made, were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure all required documentation is retained and provided for small purchases and to ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2021 (ARP) Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 23611-048-PN01, 22611-048-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Ripley-Ohio-Dearborn Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 SOUTH RIPLEY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the procurement and the suspension and debarment requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the requirements for small purchases were met for each applicable procured good or service or to ensure that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a covered transaction. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. Two vendors exceeded the small purchase threshold during the audit period. Both vendors were selected for testing. In both cases, the Cooperative had determined the curriculum and materials that were purchased, totaling $109,322, were to be provided by a single source provider; however, they did not have a documented rationale or support for the decision. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, selection of the vendor, and the basis for the price, was not available for audit for either purchase. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with SPED award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMS Exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Two covered transactions were identified that equaled or exceeded $25,000. Both transactions, totaling $109,322 were selected for testing. For the noted transactions, the Cooperative did not verify the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to payment due to the Cooperative not having any policies or procedures in place to verify that contractors were neither suspended nor debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to fiscal year 2022-2023 and the 23611-048-PN01 and 22611-048-ARP grants. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SOUTH RIPLEY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures , consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (1) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . " 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 SOUTH RIPLEY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, adequate documentation was not retained for procurements that fell within the small purchase threshold and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were made, were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure all required documentation is retained and provided for small purchases and to ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
2023-004 – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Cluster: Research and Development Sponsoring Agency: NASA, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services Award Names: Various Award Numbers: NNX17AB45G, 2137984, 2230861, DE-SC0010064, DE-SC0022559, R01MH115979-05, 1R01DA054967-01A1, 1R01DK132735-01, 3UM1AI068636-15S3, 5R01HL155905-03, 5R01GM143536-03, 2RF1AG048120-06R, 5UM1AI106701-10R2 Assistance Listing Titles: Science, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Biological Sciences, Office of Science Financial Assistance Program, Mental Health Research Grants, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, COVID-19 - Trans-NIH Research Support, COVID-19 - Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research, Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research, Biomedical Research and Training, Aging Research Assistance Listing Numbers: 43.001, 47.049, 47.074, 81.049, 93.242, 93.279, 93.310, 93.855, 93.859, 93.866 Award Year: 2022-2023 Pass-through entity: N/A all are direct awards Criteria 2 CFR 200.318(i) notes that non-Federal entities must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Non-federal entities are also prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition Through our testing of 88 procurement transactions greater than the micro-purchase threshold across four campuses and 83 transactions related to suspension and debarment across four campuses, we noted the following at one campus: • For four out of 25 procurement selections totaling $964,259, the source selection and price reasonableness justification form was not completed and as such, we were unable to obtain documentation for how these vendors were selected. • Seven SAM.gov checks of the 25 selected for testing, totaling $900,152, were not dated and as such, we were unable to confirm these checks were completed in a timely manner. For two selections, totaling $47,521, we were unable to obtain support that these vendors were either checked for suspension and debarment against SAM.gov or if the vendor was not listed on SAM.gov, evidence that the purchasing staff issued the Debarment Certification to the vendor to complete prior to the posting of the purchase order, as required by campus policy. Additionally, one Debarment and Certification form was dated after the posting of the purchase order on a transaction totaling $249,850. This is a repeat finding of 2021-003, which continued to remain open during FY2022. Cause The buyers executing these transactions did not provide the required support when executing these transactions due to lack of understanding of what is required for a federal purchase. Additionally, there are no additional levels of reviews required, such that missing documentation would be identified prior to executing federal purchases. Effect The University may not select a vendor in the most efficient manner without following proper federal procurement procedures and additionally, they may do business with a vendor that is suspended or debarred if checks are not performed. Questioned Costs None noted. Recommendation We recommend the campus provide additional training in this area and determine if there is a more effective way to flag federal transactions for buyers and when flagged, guidance is readily made available as to what documentation is required prior to executing the transaction. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings.
2023-004 – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Cluster: Research and Development Sponsoring Agency: NASA, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services Award Names: Various Award Numbers: NNX17AB45G, 2137984, 2230861, DE-SC0010064, DE-SC0022559, R01MH115979-05, 1R01DA054967-01A1, 1R01DK132735-01, 3UM1AI068636-15S3, 5R01HL155905-03, 5R01GM143536-03, 2RF1AG048120-06R, 5UM1AI106701-10R2 Assistance Listing Titles: Science, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Biological Sciences, Office of Science Financial Assistance Program, Mental Health Research Grants, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, COVID-19 - Trans-NIH Research Support, COVID-19 - Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research, Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research, Biomedical Research and Training, Aging Research Assistance Listing Numbers: 43.001, 47.049, 47.074, 81.049, 93.242, 93.279, 93.310, 93.855, 93.859, 93.866 Award Year: 2022-2023 Pass-through entity: N/A all are direct awards Criteria 2 CFR 200.318(i) notes that non-Federal entities must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Non-federal entities are also prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition Through our testing of 88 procurement transactions greater than the micro-purchase threshold across four campuses and 83 transactions related to suspension and debarment across four campuses, we noted the following at one campus: • For four out of 25 procurement selections totaling $964,259, the source selection and price reasonableness justification form was not completed and as such, we were unable to obtain documentation for how these vendors were selected. • Seven SAM.gov checks of the 25 selected for testing, totaling $900,152, were not dated and as such, we were unable to confirm these checks were completed in a timely manner. For two selections, totaling $47,521, we were unable to obtain support that these vendors were either checked for suspension and debarment against SAM.gov or if the vendor was not listed on SAM.gov, evidence that the purchasing staff issued the Debarment Certification to the vendor to complete prior to the posting of the purchase order, as required by campus policy. Additionally, one Debarment and Certification form was dated after the posting of the purchase order on a transaction totaling $249,850. This is a repeat finding of 2021-003, which continued to remain open during FY2022. Cause The buyers executing these transactions did not provide the required support when executing these transactions due to lack of understanding of what is required for a federal purchase. Additionally, there are no additional levels of reviews required, such that missing documentation would be identified prior to executing federal purchases. Effect The University may not select a vendor in the most efficient manner without following proper federal procurement procedures and additionally, they may do business with a vendor that is suspended or debarred if checks are not performed. Questioned Costs None noted. Recommendation We recommend the campus provide additional training in this area and determine if there is a more effective way to flag federal transactions for buyers and when flagged, guidance is readily made available as to what documentation is required prior to executing the transaction. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings.
2023-004 – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Cluster: Research and Development Sponsoring Agency: NASA, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services Award Names: Various Award Numbers: NNX17AB45G, 2137984, 2230861, DE-SC0010064, DE-SC0022559, R01MH115979-05, 1R01DA054967-01A1, 1R01DK132735-01, 3UM1AI068636-15S3, 5R01HL155905-03, 5R01GM143536-03, 2RF1AG048120-06R, 5UM1AI106701-10R2 Assistance Listing Titles: Science, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Biological Sciences, Office of Science Financial Assistance Program, Mental Health Research Grants, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, COVID-19 - Trans-NIH Research Support, COVID-19 - Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research, Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research, Biomedical Research and Training, Aging Research Assistance Listing Numbers: 43.001, 47.049, 47.074, 81.049, 93.242, 93.279, 93.310, 93.855, 93.859, 93.866 Award Year: 2022-2023 Pass-through entity: N/A all are direct awards Criteria 2 CFR 200.318(i) notes that non-Federal entities must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Non-federal entities are also prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition Through our testing of 88 procurement transactions greater than the micro-purchase threshold across four campuses and 83 transactions related to suspension and debarment across four campuses, we noted the following at one campus: • For four out of 25 procurement selections totaling $964,259, the source selection and price reasonableness justification form was not completed and as such, we were unable to obtain documentation for how these vendors were selected. • Seven SAM.gov checks of the 25 selected for testing, totaling $900,152, were not dated and as such, we were unable to confirm these checks were completed in a timely manner. For two selections, totaling $47,521, we were unable to obtain support that these vendors were either checked for suspension and debarment against SAM.gov or if the vendor was not listed on SAM.gov, evidence that the purchasing staff issued the Debarment Certification to the vendor to complete prior to the posting of the purchase order, as required by campus policy. Additionally, one Debarment and Certification form was dated after the posting of the purchase order on a transaction totaling $249,850. This is a repeat finding of 2021-003, which continued to remain open during FY2022. Cause The buyers executing these transactions did not provide the required support when executing these transactions due to lack of understanding of what is required for a federal purchase. Additionally, there are no additional levels of reviews required, such that missing documentation would be identified prior to executing federal purchases. Effect The University may not select a vendor in the most efficient manner without following proper federal procurement procedures and additionally, they may do business with a vendor that is suspended or debarred if checks are not performed. Questioned Costs None noted. Recommendation We recommend the campus provide additional training in this area and determine if there is a more effective way to flag federal transactions for buyers and when flagged, guidance is readily made available as to what documentation is required prior to executing the transaction. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings.
2023-004 – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Cluster: Research and Development Sponsoring Agency: NASA, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services Award Names: Various Award Numbers: NNX17AB45G, 2137984, 2230861, DE-SC0010064, DE-SC0022559, R01MH115979-05, 1R01DA054967-01A1, 1R01DK132735-01, 3UM1AI068636-15S3, 5R01HL155905-03, 5R01GM143536-03, 2RF1AG048120-06R, 5UM1AI106701-10R2 Assistance Listing Titles: Science, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Biological Sciences, Office of Science Financial Assistance Program, Mental Health Research Grants, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, COVID-19 - Trans-NIH Research Support, COVID-19 - Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research, Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research, Biomedical Research and Training, Aging Research Assistance Listing Numbers: 43.001, 47.049, 47.074, 81.049, 93.242, 93.279, 93.310, 93.855, 93.859, 93.866 Award Year: 2022-2023 Pass-through entity: N/A all are direct awards Criteria 2 CFR 200.318(i) notes that non-Federal entities must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Non-federal entities are also prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition Through our testing of 88 procurement transactions greater than the micro-purchase threshold across four campuses and 83 transactions related to suspension and debarment across four campuses, we noted the following at one campus: • For four out of 25 procurement selections totaling $964,259, the source selection and price reasonableness justification form was not completed and as such, we were unable to obtain documentation for how these vendors were selected. • Seven SAM.gov checks of the 25 selected for testing, totaling $900,152, were not dated and as such, we were unable to confirm these checks were completed in a timely manner. For two selections, totaling $47,521, we were unable to obtain support that these vendors were either checked for suspension and debarment against SAM.gov or if the vendor was not listed on SAM.gov, evidence that the purchasing staff issued the Debarment Certification to the vendor to complete prior to the posting of the purchase order, as required by campus policy. Additionally, one Debarment and Certification form was dated after the posting of the purchase order on a transaction totaling $249,850. This is a repeat finding of 2021-003, which continued to remain open during FY2022. Cause The buyers executing these transactions did not provide the required support when executing these transactions due to lack of understanding of what is required for a federal purchase. Additionally, there are no additional levels of reviews required, such that missing documentation would be identified prior to executing federal purchases. Effect The University may not select a vendor in the most efficient manner without following proper federal procurement procedures and additionally, they may do business with a vendor that is suspended or debarred if checks are not performed. Questioned Costs None noted. Recommendation We recommend the campus provide additional training in this area and determine if there is a more effective way to flag federal transactions for buyers and when flagged, guidance is readily made available as to what documentation is required prior to executing the transaction. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings.
2023-004 – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Cluster: Research and Development Sponsoring Agency: NASA, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services Award Names: Various Award Numbers: NNX17AB45G, 2137984, 2230861, DE-SC0010064, DE-SC0022559, R01MH115979-05, 1R01DA054967-01A1, 1R01DK132735-01, 3UM1AI068636-15S3, 5R01HL155905-03, 5R01GM143536-03, 2RF1AG048120-06R, 5UM1AI106701-10R2 Assistance Listing Titles: Science, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Biological Sciences, Office of Science Financial Assistance Program, Mental Health Research Grants, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, COVID-19 - Trans-NIH Research Support, COVID-19 - Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research, Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research, Biomedical Research and Training, Aging Research Assistance Listing Numbers: 43.001, 47.049, 47.074, 81.049, 93.242, 93.279, 93.310, 93.855, 93.859, 93.866 Award Year: 2022-2023 Pass-through entity: N/A all are direct awards Criteria 2 CFR 200.318(i) notes that non-Federal entities must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Non-federal entities are also prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition Through our testing of 88 procurement transactions greater than the micro-purchase threshold across four campuses and 83 transactions related to suspension and debarment across four campuses, we noted the following at one campus: • For four out of 25 procurement selections totaling $964,259, the source selection and price reasonableness justification form was not completed and as such, we were unable to obtain documentation for how these vendors were selected. • Seven SAM.gov checks of the 25 selected for testing, totaling $900,152, were not dated and as such, we were unable to confirm these checks were completed in a timely manner. For two selections, totaling $47,521, we were unable to obtain support that these vendors were either checked for suspension and debarment against SAM.gov or if the vendor was not listed on SAM.gov, evidence that the purchasing staff issued the Debarment Certification to the vendor to complete prior to the posting of the purchase order, as required by campus policy. Additionally, one Debarment and Certification form was dated after the posting of the purchase order on a transaction totaling $249,850. This is a repeat finding of 2021-003, which continued to remain open during FY2022. Cause The buyers executing these transactions did not provide the required support when executing these transactions due to lack of understanding of what is required for a federal purchase. Additionally, there are no additional levels of reviews required, such that missing documentation would be identified prior to executing federal purchases. Effect The University may not select a vendor in the most efficient manner without following proper federal procurement procedures and additionally, they may do business with a vendor that is suspended or debarred if checks are not performed. Questioned Costs None noted. Recommendation We recommend the campus provide additional training in this area and determine if there is a more effective way to flag federal transactions for buyers and when flagged, guidance is readily made available as to what documentation is required prior to executing the transaction. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings.
2023-004 – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Cluster: Research and Development Sponsoring Agency: NASA, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services Award Names: Various Award Numbers: NNX17AB45G, 2137984, 2230861, DE-SC0010064, DE-SC0022559, R01MH115979-05, 1R01DA054967-01A1, 1R01DK132735-01, 3UM1AI068636-15S3, 5R01HL155905-03, 5R01GM143536-03, 2RF1AG048120-06R, 5UM1AI106701-10R2 Assistance Listing Titles: Science, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Biological Sciences, Office of Science Financial Assistance Program, Mental Health Research Grants, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, COVID-19 - Trans-NIH Research Support, COVID-19 - Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research, Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research, Biomedical Research and Training, Aging Research Assistance Listing Numbers: 43.001, 47.049, 47.074, 81.049, 93.242, 93.279, 93.310, 93.855, 93.859, 93.866 Award Year: 2022-2023 Pass-through entity: N/A all are direct awards Criteria 2 CFR 200.318(i) notes that non-Federal entities must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Non-federal entities are also prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition Through our testing of 88 procurement transactions greater than the micro-purchase threshold across four campuses and 83 transactions related to suspension and debarment across four campuses, we noted the following at one campus: • For four out of 25 procurement selections totaling $964,259, the source selection and price reasonableness justification form was not completed and as such, we were unable to obtain documentation for how these vendors were selected. • Seven SAM.gov checks of the 25 selected for testing, totaling $900,152, were not dated and as such, we were unable to confirm these checks were completed in a timely manner. For two selections, totaling $47,521, we were unable to obtain support that these vendors were either checked for suspension and debarment against SAM.gov or if the vendor was not listed on SAM.gov, evidence that the purchasing staff issued the Debarment Certification to the vendor to complete prior to the posting of the purchase order, as required by campus policy. Additionally, one Debarment and Certification form was dated after the posting of the purchase order on a transaction totaling $249,850. This is a repeat finding of 2021-003, which continued to remain open during FY2022. Cause The buyers executing these transactions did not provide the required support when executing these transactions due to lack of understanding of what is required for a federal purchase. Additionally, there are no additional levels of reviews required, such that missing documentation would be identified prior to executing federal purchases. Effect The University may not select a vendor in the most efficient manner without following proper federal procurement procedures and additionally, they may do business with a vendor that is suspended or debarred if checks are not performed. Questioned Costs None noted. Recommendation We recommend the campus provide additional training in this area and determine if there is a more effective way to flag federal transactions for buyers and when flagged, guidance is readily made available as to what documentation is required prior to executing the transaction. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings.
2023-004 – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Cluster: Research and Development Sponsoring Agency: NASA, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services Award Names: Various Award Numbers: NNX17AB45G, 2137984, 2230861, DE-SC0010064, DE-SC0022559, R01MH115979-05, 1R01DA054967-01A1, 1R01DK132735-01, 3UM1AI068636-15S3, 5R01HL155905-03, 5R01GM143536-03, 2RF1AG048120-06R, 5UM1AI106701-10R2 Assistance Listing Titles: Science, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Biological Sciences, Office of Science Financial Assistance Program, Mental Health Research Grants, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, COVID-19 - Trans-NIH Research Support, COVID-19 - Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research, Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research, Biomedical Research and Training, Aging Research Assistance Listing Numbers: 43.001, 47.049, 47.074, 81.049, 93.242, 93.279, 93.310, 93.855, 93.859, 93.866 Award Year: 2022-2023 Pass-through entity: N/A all are direct awards Criteria 2 CFR 200.318(i) notes that non-Federal entities must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Non-federal entities are also prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition Through our testing of 88 procurement transactions greater than the micro-purchase threshold across four campuses and 83 transactions related to suspension and debarment across four campuses, we noted the following at one campus: • For four out of 25 procurement selections totaling $964,259, the source selection and price reasonableness justification form was not completed and as such, we were unable to obtain documentation for how these vendors were selected. • Seven SAM.gov checks of the 25 selected for testing, totaling $900,152, were not dated and as such, we were unable to confirm these checks were completed in a timely manner. For two selections, totaling $47,521, we were unable to obtain support that these vendors were either checked for suspension and debarment against SAM.gov or if the vendor was not listed on SAM.gov, evidence that the purchasing staff issued the Debarment Certification to the vendor to complete prior to the posting of the purchase order, as required by campus policy. Additionally, one Debarment and Certification form was dated after the posting of the purchase order on a transaction totaling $249,850. This is a repeat finding of 2021-003, which continued to remain open during FY2022. Cause The buyers executing these transactions did not provide the required support when executing these transactions due to lack of understanding of what is required for a federal purchase. Additionally, there are no additional levels of reviews required, such that missing documentation would be identified prior to executing federal purchases. Effect The University may not select a vendor in the most efficient manner without following proper federal procurement procedures and additionally, they may do business with a vendor that is suspended or debarred if checks are not performed. Questioned Costs None noted. Recommendation We recommend the campus provide additional training in this area and determine if there is a more effective way to flag federal transactions for buyers and when flagged, guidance is readily made available as to what documentation is required prior to executing the transaction. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings.
2023-004 – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Cluster: Research and Development Sponsoring Agency: NASA, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services Award Names: Various Award Numbers: NNX17AB45G, 2137984, 2230861, DE-SC0010064, DE-SC0022559, R01MH115979-05, 1R01DA054967-01A1, 1R01DK132735-01, 3UM1AI068636-15S3, 5R01HL155905-03, 5R01GM143536-03, 2RF1AG048120-06R, 5UM1AI106701-10R2 Assistance Listing Titles: Science, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Biological Sciences, Office of Science Financial Assistance Program, Mental Health Research Grants, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, COVID-19 - Trans-NIH Research Support, COVID-19 - Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research, Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research, Biomedical Research and Training, Aging Research Assistance Listing Numbers: 43.001, 47.049, 47.074, 81.049, 93.242, 93.279, 93.310, 93.855, 93.859, 93.866 Award Year: 2022-2023 Pass-through entity: N/A all are direct awards Criteria 2 CFR 200.318(i) notes that non-Federal entities must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Non-federal entities are also prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition Through our testing of 88 procurement transactions greater than the micro-purchase threshold across four campuses and 83 transactions related to suspension and debarment across four campuses, we noted the following at one campus: • For four out of 25 procurement selections totaling $964,259, the source selection and price reasonableness justification form was not completed and as such, we were unable to obtain documentation for how these vendors were selected. • Seven SAM.gov checks of the 25 selected for testing, totaling $900,152, were not dated and as such, we were unable to confirm these checks were completed in a timely manner. For two selections, totaling $47,521, we were unable to obtain support that these vendors were either checked for suspension and debarment against SAM.gov or if the vendor was not listed on SAM.gov, evidence that the purchasing staff issued the Debarment Certification to the vendor to complete prior to the posting of the purchase order, as required by campus policy. Additionally, one Debarment and Certification form was dated after the posting of the purchase order on a transaction totaling $249,850. This is a repeat finding of 2021-003, which continued to remain open during FY2022. Cause The buyers executing these transactions did not provide the required support when executing these transactions due to lack of understanding of what is required for a federal purchase. Additionally, there are no additional levels of reviews required, such that missing documentation would be identified prior to executing federal purchases. Effect The University may not select a vendor in the most efficient manner without following proper federal procurement procedures and additionally, they may do business with a vendor that is suspended or debarred if checks are not performed. Questioned Costs None noted. Recommendation We recommend the campus provide additional training in this area and determine if there is a more effective way to flag federal transactions for buyers and when flagged, guidance is readily made available as to what documentation is required prior to executing the transaction. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings.
2023-004 – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Cluster: Research and Development Sponsoring Agency: NASA, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services Award Names: Various Award Numbers: NNX17AB45G, 2137984, 2230861, DE-SC0010064, DE-SC0022559, R01MH115979-05, 1R01DA054967-01A1, 1R01DK132735-01, 3UM1AI068636-15S3, 5R01HL155905-03, 5R01GM143536-03, 2RF1AG048120-06R, 5UM1AI106701-10R2 Assistance Listing Titles: Science, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Biological Sciences, Office of Science Financial Assistance Program, Mental Health Research Grants, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, COVID-19 - Trans-NIH Research Support, COVID-19 - Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research, Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research, Biomedical Research and Training, Aging Research Assistance Listing Numbers: 43.001, 47.049, 47.074, 81.049, 93.242, 93.279, 93.310, 93.855, 93.859, 93.866 Award Year: 2022-2023 Pass-through entity: N/A all are direct awards Criteria 2 CFR 200.318(i) notes that non-Federal entities must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Non-federal entities are also prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition Through our testing of 88 procurement transactions greater than the micro-purchase threshold across four campuses and 83 transactions related to suspension and debarment across four campuses, we noted the following at one campus: • For four out of 25 procurement selections totaling $964,259, the source selection and price reasonableness justification form was not completed and as such, we were unable to obtain documentation for how these vendors were selected. • Seven SAM.gov checks of the 25 selected for testing, totaling $900,152, were not dated and as such, we were unable to confirm these checks were completed in a timely manner. For two selections, totaling $47,521, we were unable to obtain support that these vendors were either checked for suspension and debarment against SAM.gov or if the vendor was not listed on SAM.gov, evidence that the purchasing staff issued the Debarment Certification to the vendor to complete prior to the posting of the purchase order, as required by campus policy. Additionally, one Debarment and Certification form was dated after the posting of the purchase order on a transaction totaling $249,850. This is a repeat finding of 2021-003, which continued to remain open during FY2022. Cause The buyers executing these transactions did not provide the required support when executing these transactions due to lack of understanding of what is required for a federal purchase. Additionally, there are no additional levels of reviews required, such that missing documentation would be identified prior to executing federal purchases. Effect The University may not select a vendor in the most efficient manner without following proper federal procurement procedures and additionally, they may do business with a vendor that is suspended or debarred if checks are not performed. Questioned Costs None noted. Recommendation We recommend the campus provide additional training in this area and determine if there is a more effective way to flag federal transactions for buyers and when flagged, guidance is readily made available as to what documentation is required prior to executing the transaction. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings.
2023-004 – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Cluster: Research and Development Sponsoring Agency: NASA, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services Award Names: Various Award Numbers: NNX17AB45G, 2137984, 2230861, DE-SC0010064, DE-SC0022559, R01MH115979-05, 1R01DA054967-01A1, 1R01DK132735-01, 3UM1AI068636-15S3, 5R01HL155905-03, 5R01GM143536-03, 2RF1AG048120-06R, 5UM1AI106701-10R2 Assistance Listing Titles: Science, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Biological Sciences, Office of Science Financial Assistance Program, Mental Health Research Grants, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, COVID-19 - Trans-NIH Research Support, COVID-19 - Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research, Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research, Biomedical Research and Training, Aging Research Assistance Listing Numbers: 43.001, 47.049, 47.074, 81.049, 93.242, 93.279, 93.310, 93.855, 93.859, 93.866 Award Year: 2022-2023 Pass-through entity: N/A all are direct awards Criteria 2 CFR 200.318(i) notes that non-Federal entities must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Non-federal entities are also prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition Through our testing of 88 procurement transactions greater than the micro-purchase threshold across four campuses and 83 transactions related to suspension and debarment across four campuses, we noted the following at one campus: • For four out of 25 procurement selections totaling $964,259, the source selection and price reasonableness justification form was not completed and as such, we were unable to obtain documentation for how these vendors were selected. • Seven SAM.gov checks of the 25 selected for testing, totaling $900,152, were not dated and as such, we were unable to confirm these checks were completed in a timely manner. For two selections, totaling $47,521, we were unable to obtain support that these vendors were either checked for suspension and debarment against SAM.gov or if the vendor was not listed on SAM.gov, evidence that the purchasing staff issued the Debarment Certification to the vendor to complete prior to the posting of the purchase order, as required by campus policy. Additionally, one Debarment and Certification form was dated after the posting of the purchase order on a transaction totaling $249,850. This is a repeat finding of 2021-003, which continued to remain open during FY2022. Cause The buyers executing these transactions did not provide the required support when executing these transactions due to lack of understanding of what is required for a federal purchase. Additionally, there are no additional levels of reviews required, such that missing documentation would be identified prior to executing federal purchases. Effect The University may not select a vendor in the most efficient manner without following proper federal procurement procedures and additionally, they may do business with a vendor that is suspended or debarred if checks are not performed. Questioned Costs None noted. Recommendation We recommend the campus provide additional training in this area and determine if there is a more effective way to flag federal transactions for buyers and when flagged, guidance is readily made available as to what documentation is required prior to executing the transaction. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s response is included in “Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan” included at the end of this report after the summary schedule of status of prior audit findings.
CONDITION: The Northern Cambria School District contracted with three (3) third-party vendors - Advanced Office Systems, Inc. for the purchase of copier equipment, Acorns to Oaks Consulting, LLC for professional emotional support services, and McGraw-Hill Education for educational materials. The contract with Advanced Office Systems, Inc. was procured through a cooperative purchasing group. The District 1) was unable to provide documentation from the cooperative purchasing group to verify that the copier procurement contract was competitively procured, such as a bid evaluation and public solicitation, 2) did not obtain the adequate number of price or rate quotations for the professional emotional support services, and 3) did not properly document that the education material was from a sole source provider, and accordingly competitive procurement procedures would not apply. CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PS 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented. CAUSE: School District personnel directly responsible for the oversight and execution of the copier contract interpreted that the requirements specified by 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i), would be met through the cooperative purchasing, however the District appears to not have received and maintained all of the specific history of procurement documents internally, as referenced under the criteria section, to support this compliance. In addition, the District did not 1) maintain documentation to substantiate that an adequate number of price quotations were solicited for professional emotional support services, and 2) did not properly document that the education material was from a sole source provider, and accordingly competitive procurement procedures would not apply. EFFECT: The Northern Cambria School District did not comply with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance, regarding maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement for the copiers, and to document instances where there is a sole source provider such as would be required for the educational materials. In addition, the District did not comply with 24 PS 8.807.1 regarding maintaining documentation to substantiate that an adequate number of price quotations were solicited for professional emotional support services. QUESTIONED COST: $134,156 (Advanced Office Systems-$26,851) (Acorns to Oaks Consulting, LLC-$33,890) (McGraw-Hill Education-$73,415) RECOMMENDATION: I am recommending that the management of the School District review and update as necessary its procurement policies to ensure retention of the appropriate procurement documentation, in all instances, including such instances whereby the District is using a contract vehicle from a cooperative purchase network so as to comply with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, specifically Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, it is recommended that the District document its attempts to obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations as specified by 24 PS 8.807.1 over the $10,000 expenditure threshold, as well as document instances whereby the District is using a sole source provider and accordingly competitive procurement procedures would not apply. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: Management of the School District has reviewed the above noted finding and recommendation and have developed a corresponding ‘Corrective Action Plan’ to address this matter (See Corrective Action Plan).
CONDITION: The Northern Cambria School District contracted with three (3) third-party vendors - Advanced Office Systems, Inc. for the purchase of copier equipment, Acorns to Oaks Consulting, LLC for professional emotional support services, and McGraw-Hill Education for educational materials. The contract with Advanced Office Systems, Inc. was procured through a cooperative purchasing group. The District 1) was unable to provide documentation from the cooperative purchasing group to verify that the copier procurement contract was competitively procured, such as a bid evaluation and public solicitation, 2) did not obtain the adequate number of price or rate quotations for the professional emotional support services, and 3) did not properly document that the education material was from a sole source provider, and accordingly competitive procurement procedures would not apply. CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PS 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented. CAUSE: School District personnel directly responsible for the oversight and execution of the copier contract interpreted that the requirements specified by 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i), would be met through the cooperative purchasing, however the District appears to not have received and maintained all of the specific history of procurement documents internally, as referenced under the criteria section, to support this compliance. In addition, the District did not 1) maintain documentation to substantiate that an adequate number of price quotations were solicited for professional emotional support services, and 2) did not properly document that the education material was from a sole source provider, and accordingly competitive procurement procedures would not apply. EFFECT: The Northern Cambria School District did not comply with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance, regarding maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement for the copiers, and to document instances where there is a sole source provider such as would be required for the educational materials. In addition, the District did not comply with 24 PS 8.807.1 regarding maintaining documentation to substantiate that an adequate number of price quotations were solicited for professional emotional support services. QUESTIONED COST: $134,156 (Advanced Office Systems-$26,851) (Acorns to Oaks Consulting, LLC-$33,890) (McGraw-Hill Education-$73,415) RECOMMENDATION: I am recommending that the management of the School District review and update as necessary its procurement policies to ensure retention of the appropriate procurement documentation, in all instances, including such instances whereby the District is using a contract vehicle from a cooperative purchase network so as to comply with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, specifically Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, it is recommended that the District document its attempts to obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations as specified by 24 PS 8.807.1 over the $10,000 expenditure threshold, as well as document instances whereby the District is using a sole source provider and accordingly competitive procurement procedures would not apply. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: Management of the School District has reviewed the above noted finding and recommendation and have developed a corresponding ‘Corrective Action Plan’ to address this matter (See Corrective Action Plan).
CONDITION: The Northern Cambria School District contracted with three (3) third-party vendors - Advanced Office Systems, Inc. for the purchase of copier equipment, Acorns to Oaks Consulting, LLC for professional emotional support services, and McGraw-Hill Education for educational materials. The contract with Advanced Office Systems, Inc. was procured through a cooperative purchasing group. The District 1) was unable to provide documentation from the cooperative purchasing group to verify that the copier procurement contract was competitively procured, such as a bid evaluation and public solicitation, 2) did not obtain the adequate number of price or rate quotations for the professional emotional support services, and 3) did not properly document that the education material was from a sole source provider, and accordingly competitive procurement procedures would not apply. CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PS 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented. CAUSE: School District personnel directly responsible for the oversight and execution of the copier contract interpreted that the requirements specified by 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i), would be met through the cooperative purchasing, however the District appears to not have received and maintained all of the specific history of procurement documents internally, as referenced under the criteria section, to support this compliance. In addition, the District did not 1) maintain documentation to substantiate that an adequate number of price quotations were solicited for professional emotional support services, and 2) did not properly document that the education material was from a sole source provider, and accordingly competitive procurement procedures would not apply. EFFECT: The Northern Cambria School District did not comply with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance, regarding maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement for the copiers, and to document instances where there is a sole source provider such as would be required for the educational materials. In addition, the District did not comply with 24 PS 8.807.1 regarding maintaining documentation to substantiate that an adequate number of price quotations were solicited for professional emotional support services. QUESTIONED COST: $134,156 (Advanced Office Systems-$26,851) (Acorns to Oaks Consulting, LLC-$33,890) (McGraw-Hill Education-$73,415) RECOMMENDATION: I am recommending that the management of the School District review and update as necessary its procurement policies to ensure retention of the appropriate procurement documentation, in all instances, including such instances whereby the District is using a contract vehicle from a cooperative purchase network so as to comply with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, specifically Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, it is recommended that the District document its attempts to obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations as specified by 24 PS 8.807.1 over the $10,000 expenditure threshold, as well as document instances whereby the District is using a sole source provider and accordingly competitive procurement procedures would not apply. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: Management of the School District has reviewed the above noted finding and recommendation and have developed a corresponding ‘Corrective Action Plan’ to address this matter (See Corrective Action Plan).
CONDITION: The Northern Cambria School District contracted with three (3) third-party vendors - Advanced Office Systems, Inc. for the purchase of copier equipment, Acorns to Oaks Consulting, LLC for professional emotional support services, and McGraw-Hill Education for educational materials. The contract with Advanced Office Systems, Inc. was procured through a cooperative purchasing group. The District 1) was unable to provide documentation from the cooperative purchasing group to verify that the copier procurement contract was competitively procured, such as a bid evaluation and public solicitation, 2) did not obtain the adequate number of price or rate quotations for the professional emotional support services, and 3) did not properly document that the education material was from a sole source provider, and accordingly competitive procurement procedures would not apply. CRITERIA: As specified in 2 CFR 200. 318(i) of the Uniform Guidance, the District must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, small purchase procedures per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) for acquisitions between the micro-purchase threshold (currently $10,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (current $250,000), price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate. Per 24 PS 8.807.1, there should be three quotes that are either written or well documented. CAUSE: School District personnel directly responsible for the oversight and execution of the copier contract interpreted that the requirements specified by 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i), would be met through the cooperative purchasing, however the District appears to not have received and maintained all of the specific history of procurement documents internally, as referenced under the criteria section, to support this compliance. In addition, the District did not 1) maintain documentation to substantiate that an adequate number of price quotations were solicited for professional emotional support services, and 2) did not properly document that the education material was from a sole source provider, and accordingly competitive procurement procedures would not apply. EFFECT: The Northern Cambria School District did not comply with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance, regarding maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement for the copiers, and to document instances where there is a sole source provider such as would be required for the educational materials. In addition, the District did not comply with 24 PS 8.807.1 regarding maintaining documentation to substantiate that an adequate number of price quotations were solicited for professional emotional support services. QUESTIONED COST: $134,156 (Advanced Office Systems-$26,851) (Acorns to Oaks Consulting, LLC-$33,890) (McGraw-Hill Education-$73,415) RECOMMENDATION: I am recommending that the management of the School District review and update as necessary its procurement policies to ensure retention of the appropriate procurement documentation, in all instances, including such instances whereby the District is using a contract vehicle from a cooperative purchase network so as to comply with all applicable sections of the Uniform Guidance, specifically Section 2 CFR 200.318(i) and 2 CFR.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, it is recommended that the District document its attempts to obtain an adequate number of price or rate quotations as specified by 24 PS 8.807.1 over the $10,000 expenditure threshold, as well as document instances whereby the District is using a sole source provider and accordingly competitive procurement procedures would not apply. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: Management of the School District has reviewed the above noted finding and recommendation and have developed a corresponding ‘Corrective Action Plan’ to address this matter (See Corrective Action Plan).
FINDING 2023-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 21-22, FY 22-23 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion, Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the 1 small purchase procurement selected for testing, the School Corporation did not obtain quotes from 3 vendors as required. Additionally, the School Corporation did not perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendor. The total purchases in FY22 from the vendor totaled $114,041 for food purchases. The noncompliance is isolated to FY22. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 21-22, FY 22-23 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion, Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not established a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the 1 small purchase procurement selected for testing, the School Corporation did not obtain quotes from 3 vendors as required. Additionally, the School Corporation did not perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendor. The total purchases in FY22 from the vendor totaled $114,041 for food purchases. The noncompliance is isolated to FY22. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance and comply with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Compliance with Uniform Guidance - Procurement Suspension and Debarment Information on Federal Program: Unaccompanied Alien Children (Assistance Listing No. 93.676) provided by the Department of Health and Human Services. Criteria: 2 CFR Sections 200.212, 200.318(h), and 180.300 and 48 CFR Section 52.209-6 state that a non-Federal entity must review that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal award programs. Condition: During our testing for procurement compliance, it was determined that the Home did not verify that vendors charged to the major program are not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal award programs. Questioned Cost: None Cause: The Home was not aware of the requirement to review an entity’s status. Effect: The Home is not in compliance with 2 CFR Sections 200.212, 200.318(h), and 180.300 and 48 CFR Section 52.209-6. As a result, the Home could enter into covered transactions with entities that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal award programs. Perspective Information: Vendors in excess of the $25,000 threshold were reviewed to determine if they are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal award programs. None were noted to be ineligible for participation. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend the Home review and document the verification that vendors are not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal award programs. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: This item was included in the 6/30/22 Report on Compliance for Major Federal Programs which was finalized in February 2023. The G/L Vendor List was found to contain many inactive vendors and was modified. Beginning in October 2023, management began sending the vendor List to EPStaffCheck on a monthly basis. Each vendor is run through OIG (Office of Inspector General for Excluded Individuals/Entities); OIG_Most_Wanted (Fugitives}; SAM (System for Award Management for excluded parties); SON.Office of Foreign Assets Control (Specially Designated Nationals) and NY _Medicaid (Exclusion List).
Finding 2023-003 Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance and immaterial noncompliance. Federal Award Program: HUD Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Assistance Listing #14.181) Compliance Requirement: Procurement Criteria: Pursuant to the Uniform Guidance, for procurements of goods and services made with federal awards, River Kourt Apartments is required to have policies in place that conform with the Procurement Standards as prescribed in 2 CFR §200.318 through §200.320. River Kourt Apartments is required to follow the methods of procurement as prescribed in 2 CFR §200.320. Condition: River Kourt Apartments has written policies and procedures regarding the procurement of goods and services; however, the written procedures did not include all required elements regarding procurement procedures pursuant to 2 CFR §200.318 through §200.320. Cause of Condition: River Kourt Apartments has written policies and procedures regarding the procurement of goods and services; however, the written procedures did not include all required elements regarding procurement procedures pursuant to 2 CFR §200.318 through §200.320. Effect of Condition: This increases risk that River Kourt Apartments would not materially comply with the procurement requirement for the major program. Questioned Costs: None. Context: There were no procurements over the de minimis threshold made during the year period ended June 30, 2023; however, the written procedures did not include all required elements regarding procurement procedures pursuant to 2 CFR §200.318 through §200.320. Repeat Finding: Yes, see Finding 2022-003. Recommendation: We recommend management revise the current policies and procedures to include all required elements for procurement procedures pursuant to 2 CFR §200.318 through §200.320. Procurement methods shall follow the methods as prescribed in 2 CFR §200.320. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-009. Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented an effective system of internal controls to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance. Procurement A School Nutrition Cooperative (Co-ops, Education Service Center, Group Purchasing Organization, etc.) that would like to be classified as a School Food Authority (SFA) Cooperative must complete a questionnaire and submit it to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE). Once a questionnaire is received, the IDOE will review the answers to determine a Cooperative's classification. Only Cooperatives that submit the questionnaire and receive a SFA only Cooperative classification from the IDOE in writing will be considered a SFA only Cooperative for the purposes of the procurement process and procurement reviews. When the value of goods or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, the proper purchasing method would be the bidding process, unless the purchase meets certain other qualifications. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. The School Corporation purchased milk through Region 8 Education Service Center (Region 8). However, Region 8 had not received the SFA-only Cooperative classification from the IDOE for fiscal years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023. As such, the School Corporation could not rely on the procurement done by Region 8. Region 8 could be considered one quote for procurement; however, the School Corporation did not obtain any other quotes related to the purchase of milk, therefore, an adequate number of quotes from qualified sources was not obtained. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 MADISON-GRANT UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation noted that vendors were checked against SAM.Gov and verified to not be suspended or debarred. Four covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. All four transactions, totaling $213,795, were selected for testing. For three of the four vendors, the School Corporation did not verify the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The total amount spent with the three vendors was $122,034. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 MADISON-GRANT UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 MADISON-GRANT UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls, and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-009. Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented an effective system of internal controls to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance. Procurement A School Nutrition Cooperative (Co-ops, Education Service Center, Group Purchasing Organization, etc.) that would like to be classified as a School Food Authority (SFA) Cooperative must complete a questionnaire and submit it to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE). Once a questionnaire is received, the IDOE will review the answers to determine a Cooperative's classification. Only Cooperatives that submit the questionnaire and receive a SFA only Cooperative classification from the IDOE in writing will be considered a SFA only Cooperative for the purposes of the procurement process and procurement reviews. When the value of goods or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, the proper purchasing method would be the bidding process, unless the purchase meets certain other qualifications. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. The School Corporation purchased milk through Region 8 Education Service Center (Region 8). However, Region 8 had not received the SFA-only Cooperative classification from the IDOE for fiscal years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023. As such, the School Corporation could not rely on the procurement done by Region 8. Region 8 could be considered one quote for procurement; however, the School Corporation did not obtain any other quotes related to the purchase of milk, therefore, an adequate number of quotes from qualified sources was not obtained. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 MADISON-GRANT UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation noted that vendors were checked against SAM.Gov and verified to not be suspended or debarred. Four covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. All four transactions, totaling $213,795, were selected for testing. For three of the four vendors, the School Corporation did not verify the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The total amount spent with the three vendors was $122,034. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 MADISON-GRANT UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 MADISON-GRANT UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls, and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-009. Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented an effective system of internal controls to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance. Procurement A School Nutrition Cooperative (Co-ops, Education Service Center, Group Purchasing Organization, etc.) that would like to be classified as a School Food Authority (SFA) Cooperative must complete a questionnaire and submit it to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE). Once a questionnaire is received, the IDOE will review the answers to determine a Cooperative's classification. Only Cooperatives that submit the questionnaire and receive a SFA only Cooperative classification from the IDOE in writing will be considered a SFA only Cooperative for the purposes of the procurement process and procurement reviews. When the value of goods or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, the proper purchasing method would be the bidding process, unless the purchase meets certain other qualifications. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. The School Corporation purchased milk through Region 8 Education Service Center (Region 8). However, Region 8 had not received the SFA-only Cooperative classification from the IDOE for fiscal years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023. As such, the School Corporation could not rely on the procurement done by Region 8. Region 8 could be considered one quote for procurement; however, the School Corporation did not obtain any other quotes related to the purchase of milk, therefore, an adequate number of quotes from qualified sources was not obtained. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 MADISON-GRANT UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation noted that vendors were checked against SAM.Gov and verified to not be suspended or debarred. Four covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. All four transactions, totaling $213,795, were selected for testing. For three of the four vendors, the School Corporation did not verify the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The total amount spent with the three vendors was $122,034. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 MADISON-GRANT UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 MADISON-GRANT UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls, and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-009. Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented an effective system of internal controls to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance. Procurement A School Nutrition Cooperative (Co-ops, Education Service Center, Group Purchasing Organization, etc.) that would like to be classified as a School Food Authority (SFA) Cooperative must complete a questionnaire and submit it to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE). Once a questionnaire is received, the IDOE will review the answers to determine a Cooperative's classification. Only Cooperatives that submit the questionnaire and receive a SFA only Cooperative classification from the IDOE in writing will be considered a SFA only Cooperative for the purposes of the procurement process and procurement reviews. When the value of goods or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, the proper purchasing method would be the bidding process, unless the purchase meets certain other qualifications. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. The School Corporation purchased milk through Region 8 Education Service Center (Region 8). However, Region 8 had not received the SFA-only Cooperative classification from the IDOE for fiscal years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023. As such, the School Corporation could not rely on the procurement done by Region 8. Region 8 could be considered one quote for procurement; however, the School Corporation did not obtain any other quotes related to the purchase of milk, therefore, an adequate number of quotes from qualified sources was not obtained. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 MADISON-GRANT UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation noted that vendors were checked against SAM.Gov and verified to not be suspended or debarred. Four covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. All four transactions, totaling $213,795, were selected for testing. For three of the four vendors, the School Corporation did not verify the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The total amount spent with the three vendors was $122,034. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 MADISON-GRANT UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 MADISON-GRANT UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls, and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-009. Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented an effective system of internal controls to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance. Procurement A School Nutrition Cooperative (Co-ops, Education Service Center, Group Purchasing Organization, etc.) that would like to be classified as a School Food Authority (SFA) Cooperative must complete a questionnaire and submit it to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE). Once a questionnaire is received, the IDOE will review the answers to determine a Cooperative's classification. Only Cooperatives that submit the questionnaire and receive a SFA only Cooperative classification from the IDOE in writing will be considered a SFA only Cooperative for the purposes of the procurement process and procurement reviews. When the value of goods or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, the proper purchasing method would be the bidding process, unless the purchase meets certain other qualifications. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. The School Corporation purchased milk through Region 8 Education Service Center (Region 8). However, Region 8 had not received the SFA-only Cooperative classification from the IDOE for fiscal years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023. As such, the School Corporation could not rely on the procurement done by Region 8. Region 8 could be considered one quote for procurement; however, the School Corporation did not obtain any other quotes related to the purchase of milk, therefore, an adequate number of quotes from qualified sources was not obtained. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 MADISON-GRANT UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation noted that vendors were checked against SAM.Gov and verified to not be suspended or debarred. Four covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. All four transactions, totaling $213,795, were selected for testing. For three of the four vendors, the School Corporation did not verify the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The total amount spent with the three vendors was $122,034. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 MADISON-GRANT UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 MADISON-GRANT UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls, and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-009. Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented an effective system of internal controls to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance. Procurement A School Nutrition Cooperative (Co-ops, Education Service Center, Group Purchasing Organization, etc.) that would like to be classified as a School Food Authority (SFA) Cooperative must complete a questionnaire and submit it to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE). Once a questionnaire is received, the IDOE will review the answers to determine a Cooperative's classification. Only Cooperatives that submit the questionnaire and receive a SFA only Cooperative classification from the IDOE in writing will be considered a SFA only Cooperative for the purposes of the procurement process and procurement reviews. When the value of goods or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, the proper purchasing method would be the bidding process, unless the purchase meets certain other qualifications. Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. The School Corporation purchased milk through Region 8 Education Service Center (Region 8). However, Region 8 had not received the SFA-only Cooperative classification from the IDOE for fiscal years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023. As such, the School Corporation could not rely on the procurement done by Region 8. Region 8 could be considered one quote for procurement; however, the School Corporation did not obtain any other quotes related to the purchase of milk, therefore, an adequate number of quotes from qualified sources was not obtained. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 MADISON-GRANT UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation noted that vendors were checked against SAM.Gov and verified to not be suspended or debarred. Four covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. All four transactions, totaling $213,795, were selected for testing. For three of the four vendors, the School Corporation did not verify the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The total amount spent with the three vendors was $122,034. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 MADISON-GRANT UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 MADISON-GRANT UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls, and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
2023-002 - Significant Deficiency - Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Lack of Written Policies and Procedures including Suspension & Debarment and Conflict of Interest Federal Expenditures Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Written Policies ALN Number: 21.027 Criteria: Title 2 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 180.300 (January 1, 2021) requires non-federal entities to verify an entity is not excluded or disqualified prior to entering into a covered transaction by, "(a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that [entity]; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that [entity]." A good internal control plan requires adequate procedures to ensure the County has proper procedures in place to verify that contractors paid with grant funds are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities. The Uniform Guidance requires nonfederal entities that receive federal awards to establish written policies, procedures, and or/standards of conduct, except if excluded in compliance supplement. There are four basic reasons for creating an internal control system through defining and documenting processes with well-written policies and procedures: 1. Compliance 2. Operational Needs 2. Managing Risks 4. Continuous Improvement Complying with laws and regulations should be a critical funciton of the County. Well-defined and documented processes (i.e. procedures, training manuals) along with records that demonstrate process capability can make evident an effective internal control system and compliance to Federal guidelines. Another important role of documentation of procedures is to ensure processes fundamental to the County are properly guided by County's officials, and are consistent way that meets the County's needs, and that are important related information and data are captured and communicated. Documentation of procedures are important for controlling process, documenting the standard work that was performed and training new employees. Condition: The County lacks certain written policies and procedures required by Uniform Guidance. Although the County has an outdated Accounting Policy, certain policies for Federal Expenditures need to be updated and added. These include: 1. Financial management (200.302) 2. Payment (200.305) 3. General procurement standards (200.318) 4. Competition (200.319) 5. Methods of procurement to be followed (200.320) 6. Compensation - personal services (200.430) 7. Compensation - fringe benefits (200.431) 8. Relocation costs of employees (200.464) 9. Travel costs (200.474) Cause: Appears to be the result of a lack of training coupled with limited staffing and resources. Questioned Costs: None Context for Calculation of Questioned Costs: None Effect: Without adequate procedures to ensure contractors are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities, there is an increased risk for the misuse of Federal funds and noncompliance with Federal regulations. Recommendation: We recommend the County implement proceduresto ensure, prior to entering into a covered transaction, that a contractor in not syspended, bebarred, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal programs or activities, and that procedures is adequately documented. Furthermore, the County should familiarize themselves with the Uniform Guidance and implement the following: 1. Develop and document all of its significant processes over federal awards. 2. Make the written policies and procedures available to all personnel and departments within the County. 3. Ensure the written policies and procedures are accurate, complete, and current at all times (The Board of County Commissioners should update the policy on an annual basis.) 4. Revise policies and procedures for changes in business processes and policies over federal awards. 5. Communicate significant changes to all affected personnel immediately to ensure they are aware of any revisions to their responsibilities to the federal award. 6. Document policies and procedures to facilitate training and provide guidelines relative to federal awards for changes in personnel.
FINDING 2023-001 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Number: 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Number and Year: 23619-008-PN01; 22619-008-ARP Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320(b) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition and Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Delaware-Blackford Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2022-2023, the Cooperative operated the special education preschool program and spent the federal money on behalf of six of its seven members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the procurement and the suspension and debarment requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the requirements for small purchases were met for each applicable procured good or service or to ensure that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a covered transaction. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. Two vendors exceeded the small purchase threshold during the audit period. The Cooperative provided evidence of a quote being obtained for the first vendor, however, evidence of obtaining multiple quotes was not retained for audit. The chosen quote was attached to the accounts payable vouchers and provided for audit; however, the other quotes obtained for the purchase were not maintained. For the second vendor, the Cooperative determined psychological services were to be provided by a single source provider, however, they did not have a documented rationale or support for the decision. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, selection of the vendor, and the basis for the price, was not available for audit for either purchase. Suspension and Debarment The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the suspension and debarment requirement. The Cooperative did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure all applicable vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a covered transaction. As such, the Cooperative entered into a contract totaling $32,388, which exceeded $25,000, for psychological services. The Cooperative did not perform procedures to ensure that the vendor was not suspended or debarred from participation in federal programs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Cause: A proper system of internal controls was not implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation’s management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect: Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, adequate documentation was not retained for procurements that fell within the small purchase threshold and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were made, were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation: We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal control and develop policies and procedures to ensure all required documentation is retained and provided for small purchases and to ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials: For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan which is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-001 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Number: 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Number and Year: 23619-008-PN01; 22619-008-ARP Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320(b) states: "Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition and Context: The School Corporation is a member of the Delaware-Blackford Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2022-2023, the Cooperative operated the special education preschool program and spent the federal money on behalf of six of its seven members. As the grant agreements were between the Indiana Department of Education and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with the procurement and the suspension and debarment requirements. The Cooperative did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the requirements for small purchases were met for each applicable procured good or service or to ensure that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a covered transaction. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. If it is determined a single source provider can be used for a small purchase, documentation must be retained supporting the determination. Two vendors exceeded the small purchase threshold during the audit period. The Cooperative provided evidence of a quote being obtained for the first vendor, however, evidence of obtaining multiple quotes was not retained for audit. The chosen quote was attached to the accounts payable vouchers and provided for audit; however, the other quotes obtained for the purchase were not maintained. For the second vendor, the Cooperative determined psychological services were to be provided by a single source provider, however, they did not have a documented rationale or support for the decision. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, selection of the vendor, and the basis for the price, was not available for audit for either purchase. Suspension and Debarment The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the suspension and debarment requirement. The Cooperative did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure all applicable vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a covered transaction. As such, the Cooperative entered into a contract totaling $32,388, which exceeded $25,000, for psychological services. The Cooperative did not perform procedures to ensure that the vendor was not suspended or debarred from participation in federal programs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Cause: A proper system of internal controls was not implemented by management of the School Corporation, which would include segregation of key functions. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation’s management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect: Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, adequate documentation was not retained for procurements that fell within the small purchase threshold and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were made, were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation: We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal control and develop policies and procedures to ensure all required documentation is retained and provided for small purchases and to ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials: For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan which is part of this report.
Department of the Treasury, Passed through Utah Department of Workforce Services Federal Assistance Listing 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award, including procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements. Condition: The Organization’s written procurement policies did not include all of the elements required by the Code of Federal Regulations 2 CFR 200.318-200. Cause: The Organization did not have internal controls in place to review the procurement policy and ensure it complies with federal requirements. Effect: The risk is increased that a procurement noncompliance could occur. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: Nonstatistical sampling was used. Sample size was three of seven procurement transactions above the micro-purchase threshold and included contracts totaling $5,707,820 of federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, Finding 2022-002 Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement internal controls to review the procurement policy periodically to ensure it is consistent with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Department of the Treasury, Passed through Utah Department of Workforce Services Federal Assistance Listing 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award, including procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements. Condition: The Organization’s written procurement policies did not include all of the elements required by the Code of Federal Regulations 2 CFR 200.318-200. Cause: The Organization did not have internal controls in place to review the procurement policy and ensure it complies with federal requirements. Effect: The risk is increased that a procurement noncompliance could occur. Questioned Costs: None reported Context/Sampling: Nonstatistical sampling was used. Sample size was three of seven procurement transactions above the micro-purchase threshold and included contracts totaling $5,707,820 of federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes, Finding 2022-002 Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement internal controls to review the procurement policy periodically to ensure it is consistent with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
FINDING 2023-005 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-020-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Procurement Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states: "(i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and suspension and debarment compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the suspension and debarment requirements. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the one procurements sample, the School Corporation did not have any formal procurement documentation to support the decision to choose the vendor. Management stated the vendor selected was the only provider available in the area, however there was no supporting documentation to support the claim. The contact was for master level mental health professional services and the total contract amount was not to exceed $179,360. $59,824 was paid to the vendor in the audit period. Management did properly check that the vendor was not suspended or debarred. The finding is isolated to the 22611-020-ARP award. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to the grant agreement and cash management compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 GREATER JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. During fiscal year 2021-2022, the School Corporation had 119 disbursements to 5 vendors, totaling $95,842, that were considered small purchases. There were12 transactions from 5 vendors that were selected for testing. For 3 transactions, from 1 vendor, the School Corporation could not provide the procurement history or the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of vendor, and basis for price. The total dollar amount spent with the vendor was $20,777. During fiscal year 2022-2023, the School Corporation elected to increase its micro-purchase threshold from $10,000 to $50,000. As such micro-purchases were those goods or services purchased that were $50,000 or under. The School Corporation had 193 disbursements to 23 vendors, totaling $115,779, that were considered micro-purchases. A total of 20 transactions from 14 vendors were selected for testing. For 2 transactions, from 1 vendor, the School Corporation did not have adequate documentation, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of vendor, and basis of price. The total dollar amount spent with the vendor was $43,928. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 GREATER JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed that the Treasurer or Food Service Director verified vendors were not suspended or debarred by either printing a verification from SAM.gov or, if applicable, including a clause in the vendor contract. Three covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. All three transactions, totaling $389,898, were selected for testing. Two of the three transactions, totaling $72,883, did not have documentation to show that the School Corporation verified the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 GREATER JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (1) Micro-purchases – (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotation if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to, and vendors to whom payments are equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 GREATER JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 GREATER JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. During fiscal year 2021-2022, the School Corporation had 119 disbursements to 5 vendors, totaling $95,842, that were considered small purchases. There were12 transactions from 5 vendors that were selected for testing. For 3 transactions, from 1 vendor, the School Corporation could not provide the procurement history or the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of vendor, and basis for price. The total dollar amount spent with the vendor was $20,777. During fiscal year 2022-2023, the School Corporation elected to increase its micro-purchase threshold from $10,000 to $50,000. As such micro-purchases were those goods or services purchased that were $50,000 or under. The School Corporation had 193 disbursements to 23 vendors, totaling $115,779, that were considered micro-purchases. A total of 20 transactions from 14 vendors were selected for testing. For 2 transactions, from 1 vendor, the School Corporation did not have adequate documentation, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of vendor, and basis of price. The total dollar amount spent with the vendor was $43,928. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 GREATER JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed that the Treasurer or Food Service Director verified vendors were not suspended or debarred by either printing a verification from SAM.gov or, if applicable, including a clause in the vendor contract. Three covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. All three transactions, totaling $389,898, were selected for testing. Two of the three transactions, totaling $72,883, did not have documentation to show that the School Corporation verified the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 GREATER JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (1) Micro-purchases – (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotation if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to, and vendors to whom payments are equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 GREATER JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 GREATER JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. During fiscal year 2021-2022, the School Corporation had 119 disbursements to 5 vendors, totaling $95,842, that were considered small purchases. There were12 transactions from 5 vendors that were selected for testing. For 3 transactions, from 1 vendor, the School Corporation could not provide the procurement history or the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of vendor, and basis for price. The total dollar amount spent with the vendor was $20,777. During fiscal year 2022-2023, the School Corporation elected to increase its micro-purchase threshold from $10,000 to $50,000. As such micro-purchases were those goods or services purchased that were $50,000 or under. The School Corporation had 193 disbursements to 23 vendors, totaling $115,779, that were considered micro-purchases. A total of 20 transactions from 14 vendors were selected for testing. For 2 transactions, from 1 vendor, the School Corporation did not have adequate documentation, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of vendor, and basis of price. The total dollar amount spent with the vendor was $43,928. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 GREATER JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed that the Treasurer or Food Service Director verified vendors were not suspended or debarred by either printing a verification from SAM.gov or, if applicable, including a clause in the vendor contract. Three covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. All three transactions, totaling $389,898, were selected for testing. Two of the three transactions, totaling $72,883, did not have documentation to show that the School Corporation verified the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 GREATER JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (1) Micro-purchases – (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotation if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to, and vendors to whom payments are equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 GREATER JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 GREATER JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. During fiscal year 2021-2022, the School Corporation had 119 disbursements to 5 vendors, totaling $95,842, that were considered small purchases. There were12 transactions from 5 vendors that were selected for testing. For 3 transactions, from 1 vendor, the School Corporation could not provide the procurement history or the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of vendor, and basis for price. The total dollar amount spent with the vendor was $20,777. During fiscal year 2022-2023, the School Corporation elected to increase its micro-purchase threshold from $10,000 to $50,000. As such micro-purchases were those goods or services purchased that were $50,000 or under. The School Corporation had 193 disbursements to 23 vendors, totaling $115,779, that were considered micro-purchases. A total of 20 transactions from 14 vendors were selected for testing. For 2 transactions, from 1 vendor, the School Corporation did not have adequate documentation, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of vendor, and basis of price. The total dollar amount spent with the vendor was $43,928. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 GREATER JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed that the Treasurer or Food Service Director verified vendors were not suspended or debarred by either printing a verification from SAM.gov or, if applicable, including a clause in the vendor contract. Three covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. All three transactions, totaling $389,898, were selected for testing. Two of the three transactions, totaling $72,883, did not have documentation to show that the School Corporation verified the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 GREATER JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (1) Micro-purchases – (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotation if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to, and vendors to whom payments are equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 GREATER JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 GREATER JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. During fiscal year 2021-2022, the School Corporation had 119 disbursements to 5 vendors, totaling $95,842, that were considered small purchases. There were12 transactions from 5 vendors that were selected for testing. For 3 transactions, from 1 vendor, the School Corporation could not provide the procurement history or the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of vendor, and basis for price. The total dollar amount spent with the vendor was $20,777. During fiscal year 2022-2023, the School Corporation elected to increase its micro-purchase threshold from $10,000 to $50,000. As such micro-purchases were those goods or services purchased that were $50,000 or under. The School Corporation had 193 disbursements to 23 vendors, totaling $115,779, that were considered micro-purchases. A total of 20 transactions from 14 vendors were selected for testing. For 2 transactions, from 1 vendor, the School Corporation did not have adequate documentation, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of vendor, and basis of price. The total dollar amount spent with the vendor was $43,928. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 GREATER JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed that the Treasurer or Food Service Director verified vendors were not suspended or debarred by either printing a verification from SAM.gov or, if applicable, including a clause in the vendor contract. Three covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. All three transactions, totaling $389,898, were selected for testing. Two of the three transactions, totaling $72,883, did not have documentation to show that the School Corporation verified the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 GREATER JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (1) Micro-purchases – (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotation if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to, and vendors to whom payments are equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 GREATER JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 2022, FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 GREATER JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. During fiscal year 2021-2022, the School Corporation had 119 disbursements to 5 vendors, totaling $95,842, that were considered small purchases. There were12 transactions from 5 vendors that were selected for testing. For 3 transactions, from 1 vendor, the School Corporation could not provide the procurement history or the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of vendor, and basis for price. The total dollar amount spent with the vendor was $20,777. During fiscal year 2022-2023, the School Corporation elected to increase its micro-purchase threshold from $10,000 to $50,000. As such micro-purchases were those goods or services purchased that were $50,000 or under. The School Corporation had 193 disbursements to 23 vendors, totaling $115,779, that were considered micro-purchases. A total of 20 transactions from 14 vendors were selected for testing. For 2 transactions, from 1 vendor, the School Corporation did not have adequate documentation, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of vendor, and basis of price. The total dollar amount spent with the vendor was $43,928. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAMs exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 GREATER JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Upon inquiry of the School Corporation in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that a vendor with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the School Corporation disclosed that the Treasurer or Food Service Director verified vendors were not suspended or debarred by either printing a verification from SAM.gov or, if applicable, including a clause in the vendor contract. Three covered transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000 were identified. All three transactions, totaling $389,898, were selected for testing. Two of the three transactions, totaling $72,883, did not have documentation to show that the School Corporation verified the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to payment. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 GREATER JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (1) Micro-purchases – (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotation if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to, and vendors to whom payments are equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 GREATER JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number 93.829 Section 223 Demonstration Programs to Improve Community Mental Health Services ‐ 6H79SM083306‐01M002 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: The Uniform Guidance, Section 200.303 Internal Controls, requires the non‐federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal controls over federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that awards are being managed in compliance with federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The non‐Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non‐ Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.318 through 200.327. Condition: The Organization did not have a written procurement policy that was consistent with Federal, State, local, and tribal laws and regulations. Cause: There is a lack of controls over the written procurement, suspension and debarment policy. Effect: Failure to maintain a written procurement policy that was consistent with Federal, State, local, and tribal laws and regulations may result in disallowed costs. Questioned Costs: None. Context/Sampling: EB reviewed the procurement, suspension and debarment policy. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): Yes. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement a written procurement, suspension and debarment policy that meets Federal, State, local, and tribal laws and regulations. We also recommend that management review this policy regularly to confirm that it meets the requirements. Views of Responsible Individuals: Management agrees with the finding.
HEERF INSTITUTIONAL AID SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (CONTINUE) YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023 PROCUREMENT SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT FINDING NO. 2023-003 – PROCUREMENT SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT CRITERIA Suspension and Debarment Schools are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 C.F.R.§ 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered by a passthrough entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 C.F.R. § 180.215. When a school enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the school must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 C.F.R. § 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/ (click on Search Record, then click on Advanced Search- Exclusions) (Note: The OMB guidance at 2 C.F.R. part 180 and agency implementing regulations still refer to the System for Award Management Exclusions as the Excluded Parties List System), (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 C.F.R. § 180.300). Schools receiving contracts from the federal government are required to comply with the contract clause at FAR 52.209-6 before entering into a subcontract that will exceed $30,000, other than a subcontract for a commercially available off-the-shelf item. Criteria: 2 C.F.R. §§ 200.318 through 200.326 2 C.F.R. Part 180 48 C.F.R. Subpart 2.1 48 C.F.R. § 9.405-2(b) 48 C.F.R. § 52.209-6 HEERF INSTITUTIONAL AID SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (CONTINUE) YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023 PROCUREMENT SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT FINDING NO. 2023-003 – PROCUREMENT SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT (CONTINUE) CRITERIA (CONTINUE) Improper payment means: (1) Any payment that should not have been made or that was made in an incorrect amount under statutory, contractual, administrative, or other legally applicable requirements. (i) Incorrect amounts are overpayments or underpayments that are made to eligible recipients (including inappropriate denials of payment or service, any payment that does not account for credit for applicable discounts, payments that are for an incorrect amount, and duplicate payments). An improper payment also includes any payment that was made to an ineligible recipient or for an ineligible good or service, or payments for goods or services not received. Note 1 to paragraph (1)(i) of this definition. Applicable discounts are only those discounts where it is both advantageous and within the agency's control to claim them. (ii) When an agency's review is unable to discern whether a payment was proper as a result of insufficient or lack of documentation, this payment should also be considered an improper payment. When establishing documentation requirements for payments, agencies should ensure that all documentation requirements are necessary and should refrain from imposing additional burdensome documentation requirements. Code of Federal regulations Title II Subtitle A Chapter II Part 200 Subpart A-Acronyms Section 200.1 HEERF INSTITUTIONAL AID SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (CONTINUE) YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023 PROCUREMENT SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT FINDING NO. 2023-003 – PROCUREMENT SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT (CONTINUE) CONDITION We examined one hundred percent (100%) of the disbursed made and charged to HEERF Instutional Aid for the fiscal year 2022-2023 and noted the following: 1) UPM did not have documentation related Schools are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. 2) UPM made five (5) payments for $100,406.71 in advance for goods or services not received at the disbursement date. EFFECT UPM did not comply with the regulations and internal controls procedures to made disbursements before received goods or services. QUESTIONED COSTS $100,406.71 CAUSE The institution did not follow the institutional procedures to make disbursements before received goods or services according to regulations and institution procedures. RECOMMENDATION The Institution should reinforce the established procedures and adhere to them before any payment is made for goods or services. The amount of $100,406.71 should be reimbursed to the U.S. Department of Education. In addition, UPM should be included in its procedures steps to adopting regulations, to verify that the vendor entity is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS See the Corrective Action Plan for details of action required.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Financial Assistance Listing 14.231 Covid-19 Emergency Solutions Grant Program – #23-DWS-0409; #72-5-23-4428 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the Organization is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes regulations, and conditions of the federal award. Condition: In connection with the audit procedures performed, it was noted that the Organization did not adequately maintain complete procurement file documentation (as required by 2 CFR 200.318) related to one vendor that was selected for testing. Cause: The Organization did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that all vendor purchases/contracts include approved documentation of the required elements. Effect: There is an increased risk of noncompliance when internal controls are not adequately established, followed, and documented related to the procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirement. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: Nonstatistical sampling was used for this compliance requirement. Sample size was 3 of 6 vendors (that exceeded the micro-purchase threshold for this program) totaling $97,732 out of $101,595 federal expenditures. For one vendor selected and tested, which had an immaterial amount (totaling $13,360) of federal expenditures for the major federal program tested, it was noted that complete internal controls and documentation related to this compliance requirement were not adequately documented. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The Organization should improve its processes and controls for: identifying vendors that meet the criteria of the Organization’s procurement policy, and documenting a procurement file (for each such vendor) that includes the required information and approvals. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Finding Criteria – 2 CFR 200.318(i) - A component of compliance relating to federal awards is maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 200.320(a)(2)(i) - The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-chase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified services as determined appropriate by the entity. Condition Found – The District used federal ESSER funds to make purchases greater than $10,000 to $22,500 without obtaining at least three quotes, made purchases greater than $22,500 and did not obtain at least three public bids, or adequate documentation for sole source procurement. Cause of the Finding – Unable to obtain and review sufficient documentation to verify that purchases were competitively procured such as quote/bid evaluation of three vendors, or sole source procurement. Effect of the Finding – The District was not in compliance with procurement requirements for federal funds. Questioned Costs – While expenditure meet eligibility of grant expenditures, the district did not obtain three quotes/bids to document competitive procurement. The district utilized ESSER funds to make twelve purchases totaling $279,041 that did not include the relevant elements such as date, rationale for method of procurement, basis, and reasonableness, to substantiate the purchase when utilizing sole source. Recommendations - Documentation is key for all federal purchases. Obtain adequate quote/bid information from three vendors, advertise when appropriate, and thoroughly document the “reason” and “cost analysis” of sole source noncompetitive procurement exceptions. A purchase price from cooperative purchasing programs can be considered one competitive price proposal and cannot replace a procurement process. Management's Response -The district will follow the policy for obtaining three quotation/bid requirements for federal purchases and improve documentation relating to purchases that meet sole source criteria. In the event purchases are made through cooperative purchasing programs, three quotes will be documented when federal purchases are made.
Finding Criteria – 2 CFR 200.318(i) - A component of compliance relating to federal awards is maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 200.320(a)(2)(i) - The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-chase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified services as determined appropriate by the entity. Condition Found – The District used federal ESSER funds to make purchases greater than $10,000 to $22,500 without obtaining at least three quotes, made purchases greater than $22,500 and did not obtain at least three public bids, or adequate documentation for sole source procurement. Cause of the Finding – Unable to obtain and review sufficient documentation to verify that purchases were competitively procured such as quote/bid evaluation of three vendors, or sole source procurement. Effect of the Finding – The District was not in compliance with procurement requirements for federal funds. Questioned Costs – While expenditure meet eligibility of grant expenditures, the district did not obtain three quotes/bids to document competitive procurement. The district utilized ESSER funds to make twelve purchases totaling $279,041 that did not include the relevant elements such as date, rationale for method of procurement, basis, and reasonableness, to substantiate the purchase when utilizing sole source. Recommendations - Documentation is key for all federal purchases. Obtain adequate quote/bid information from three vendors, advertise when appropriate, and thoroughly document the “reason” and “cost analysis” of sole source noncompetitive procurement exceptions. A purchase price from cooperative purchasing programs can be considered one competitive price proposal and cannot replace a procurement process. Management's Response -The district will follow the policy for obtaining three quotation/bid requirements for federal purchases and improve documentation relating to purchases that meet sole source criteria. In the event purchases are made through cooperative purchasing programs, three quotes will be documented when federal purchases are made.
Finding Criteria – 2 CFR 200.318(i) - A component of compliance relating to federal awards is maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 200.320(a)(2)(i) - The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-chase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified services as determined appropriate by the entity. Condition Found – The District used federal ESSER funds to make purchases greater than $10,000 to $22,500 without obtaining at least three quotes, made purchases greater than $22,500 and did not obtain at least three public bids, or adequate documentation for sole source procurement. Cause of the Finding – Unable to obtain and review sufficient documentation to verify that purchases were competitively procured such as quote/bid evaluation of three vendors, or sole source procurement. Effect of the Finding – The District was not in compliance with procurement requirements for federal funds. Questioned Costs – While expenditure meet eligibility of grant expenditures, the district did not obtain three quotes/bids to document competitive procurement. The district utilized ESSER funds to make twelve purchases totaling $279,041 that did not include the relevant elements such as date, rationale for method of procurement, basis, and reasonableness, to substantiate the purchase when utilizing sole source. Recommendations - Documentation is key for all federal purchases. Obtain adequate quote/bid information from three vendors, advertise when appropriate, and thoroughly document the “reason” and “cost analysis” of sole source noncompetitive procurement exceptions. A purchase price from cooperative purchasing programs can be considered one competitive price proposal and cannot replace a procurement process. Management's Response -The district will follow the policy for obtaining three quotation/bid requirements for federal purchases and improve documentation relating to purchases that meet sole source criteria. In the event purchases are made through cooperative purchasing programs, three quotes will be documented when federal purchases are made.
MATERIAL WEAKNESS IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE – U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, PASSED THROUGH MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, CHILD NUTRITION CLUSTER (INCLUDING COVID-19 FUNDING) – FEDERAL ALN 10.553, 10.555, AND 10.559 2023-004 Internal Control Over Compliance and Material Noncompliance With Federal Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Requirements Criteria – 2 CFR § 180 and 2 CFR § 200.318-327 requires the District to establish and maintain effective internal control over compliance with requirements applicable to federal program expenditures, including procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements applicable to the child nutrition cluster federal program. Condition – During our audit, we noted the District did not have sufficient controls in place resulting in material noncompliance within its child nutrition cluster federal program to ensure compliance with federal procurement requirements related to methods of procurement and to assure that it was not contracting for goods or services with parties that are suspended or debarred, or whose principals are suspended or debarred from participating in contracts involving the expenditures of federal program funds. Questioned Costs – None. Context – For four of five vendors exceeding the micro-purchase threshold, the District did not document procurement policy and the Uniform Guidance requirements related to methods of procurement and a proper documentation of suspension and debarment testing was not maintained for three of three vendors tested to ensure compliance with this requirement in the current year. This was not a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding – This is a current year finding. Cause – This was an oversight by district personnel. Effect – Noncompliance with procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements could result in the District expending federal funds inappropriately or utilizing vendors that are not eligible to be parties to such transactions, which could be viewed as a violation of the award agreement. Recommendation – We recommend that the District review its internal control procedures relating to procurement, suspension, and debarment for the child nutrition cluster federal program. Internal controls over compliance should be in place to ensure compliance with federal procurement procedures, including awarding and documenting contracts based on sealed bids or quotations for the purchase of goods or services exceeding applicable federal dollar thresholds. Internal controls over compliance should also include verification that any vendor with which the District contracts for goods or services exceeding $25,000 is not listed as suspended or debarred on the federal Excluded Parties List System website. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions – The District agrees with the finding. The District intends to review its policies and procedures relating to procurement, suspension, and debarment for its federal programs to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance in the future. The District has separately issued a Corrective Action Plan related to this finding.