Criteria: 1. In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.319(a), all procurement transactions under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition. Further, 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(1)(i) requires that, to the extent practicable, micro‑purchases be distributed equitably among qualified suppliers. 2. 2 CFR § 200.214 subjects non‑Federal entities to the non-procurement suspension and debarment regulations in 2 CFR part 180, which restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from Federal awards. Under 2 CFR § 180.300, before entering into a covered transaction with another person or entity at the next lower tier, the non Federal entity must verify that the party is not excluded or disqualified. This verification may be completed by reviewing the SAM.gov Exclusions, obtaining a certification from the entity, or including an appropriate suspension and debarment clause or condition in the contract or agreement. Further, in accordance with 2 CFR § 200.318(i), non‑federal entities must maintain records sufficient to document the history of procurement transactions; and 2 CFR § 200.334 requires retention of all supporting documentation for Federal awards. Together, these regulations require that documentation of the suspension and debarment verification be retained to demonstrate compliance with Federal procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. Condition: 1. The Republic’s procurement regulation § 625(c)(3) permits small purchases under $2,500 after obtaining one written price quotation. However, the policy does not demonstrate full and open competition to ensure that to the extent practicable, small purchases are distributed equitably among qualified suppliers. Of the 131 procurement transactions, 54 were identified as within the threshold established under § 625(c)(3)No. No. of Transactions General Ledger Account Name Amount 1 20 General Supplies $ 16,123 2 18 Fuel & Other Pol Products 9,220 3 7 Advertising 5,480 4 4 All Other Rentals 3,467 5 3 Boat Rentals 4,900 6 1 Medical Supplies 364 7 1 Vehicle Cycle Etc Rentl 540 Total: 54 $ 40,094 2. The Republic represents that vendors are verified in SAM.gov before entering into covered transactions; however, no documentation was retained to demonstrate that the required verification occurred. Documentation such as screenshots, printouts, approval records, or other system‑based evidence showing that the SAM.gov check was performed, was not available in the procurement or vendor files. Of the 57 purchase orders issued during the year ended September 30, 2023, 4 were identified as covered transactions subject to federal suspension and debarment requirements, totaling $1,978,024. No. Purchase Order # Vendor Amount 1 22301491 PATIENT FOCUS ARFICA (PTY) TD. $ 48,349 2 22303764 ARC CONSULTANCY 131,924 3 22305075 GOPHER SPORT 95,036 4 PC2 ROJECT BELAU SUBMARINE CABLE CORPORATION 1,702,715 Total: $ 1,978,024 Auditor verification of the above vendors in SAM.gov did not identify any as suspended or debarred. However, the absence of documentation prevents the Republic from demonstrating compliance with Federal suspension and debarment requirements. Cause: The Republic’s procurement policy does not ensure full and open competition for small purchases due to lack of required procedures to equitably distribute small purchases among qualified suppliers. Additionally, the Republic’s procurement procedures do not require the retention of documentation evidencing that suspension and debarment checks were performed. Effect: The Republic is not in compliance with Federal procurement, suspension and debarment requirements. Without federally compliant procedures and supporting documentation, the extent of questioned costs cannot be determined, resulting in an undeterminable question cost. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Republic update its procurement policies and procedures to include specific guidance to ensure full and open competition to equitably distribute small purchases among available qualified suppliers. Management should ensure that documentation supporting the basis for supplier selection is consistently maintained in procurement files. Additionally, we recommend that the Republic strengthen its procurement and vendor‑approval procedures to require retention of evidence demonstrating that suspension and debarment verification was performed for each covered transaction. Acceptable documentation may include date‑stamped screenshots of the SAM.gov search, system‑generated verification logs, or signed certifications. Documentation should be consistently retained in the procurement or vendor file to support compliance with Federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The Republic’s Corrective Action Plan does not indicate disagreement and provides planned corrective action.
Criteria: 1. In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.319(a), all procurement transactions under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition. Further, 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(1)(i) requires that, to the extent practicable, micro‑purchases be distributed equitably among qualified suppliers. 2. 2 CFR § 200.214 subjects non‑Federal entities to the non-procurement suspension and debarment regulations in 2 CFR part 180, which restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from Federal awards. Under 2 CFR § 180.300, before entering into a covered transaction with another person or entity at the next lower tier, the non Federal entity must verify that the party is not excluded or disqualified. This verification may be completed by reviewing the SAM.gov Exclusions, obtaining a certification from the entity, or including an appropriate suspension and debarment clause or condition in the contract or agreement. Further, in accordance with 2 CFR § 200.318(i), non‑federal entities must maintain records sufficient to document the history of procurement transactions, and 2 CFR § 200.334 requires retention of all supporting documentation for Federal awards. Together, these regulations require that documentation of the suspension and debarment verification be retained to demonstrate compliance with Federal procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. Condition: 1. The Republic’s procurement regulation § 625(c)(3) permits purchases under $2,500 after obtaining one written price quotation. However, the policy does not demonstrate full and open competition to ensure that to the extent practicable, small purchases are distributed equitably among qualified suppliers. Of the 143 procurement transactions, 46 were identified as within the threshold established under § 625(c)(3). No. No. of transactions GL Account Name Amount 1 19 Machinery & Equip Repair $ 6,103 2 24 General Supplies 17,106 3 1 Professional 425 4 1 Advertising 500 5 1 Conference 504 Total: 46 $ 24,638 2. The Republic represents that vendors are verified in SAM.gov before entering into covered transactions; however, no documentation was retained to demonstrate that the required verification occurred. Documentation such as screenshots, printouts, approval records, or other system‑based evidence showing that the SAM.gov check was performed was not available in the procurement or vendor files. Of the 38 purchase orders issued during the year ended September 30, 2023, 2 were identified as covered transactions subject to federal suspension and debarment requirements, totaling $92,149. No. Purchase Order # Vendor Amount 1 22305991 EDHANNAH EDUCATION CONSULTING SERVICES $ 21,000 2 22300871 GUAM CEDDERS 71,149 Total: $ 92,149 Auditor verification of the above vendors in SAM.gov did not identify any as suspended or debarred. However, the absence of documentation prevents the Republic from demonstrating compliance with Federal suspension and debarment requirements. Cause: The Republic’s procurement policy does not ensure full and open competition for small purchases due to lack of required procedures to equitably distribute micro‑purchases among qualified suppliers. Additionally, the Republic’s procurement procedures do not require the retention of documentation evidencing that suspension and debarment checks were performed. Effect: The Republic is not in compliance with Federal procurement, suspension and debarment requirements. Without federally compliant procedures and supporting documentation, the extent of questioned costs cannot be determined, resulting in an undeterminable question cost. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Republic update its procurement policies and procedures to include specific guidance to ensure full and open competition to equitably distribute small purchases among available qualified suppliers. Management should ensure that documentation supporting the basis for supplier selection is consistently maintained in procurement files. Additionally, we recommend that the Republic strengthen its procurement and vendor‑approval procedures to require retention of evidence demonstrating that suspension and debarment verification was performed for each covered transaction. Acceptable documentation may include date‑stamped screenshots of the SAM.gov search, system‑generated verification logs, or signed certifications. Documentation should be consistently retained in the procurement or vendor file to support compliance with Federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The Republic’s Corrective Action Plan does not indicate disagreement and provides planned corrective action.
Criteria: 1. In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.319(a), all procurement transactions under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition. Further, 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(1)(i) requires that, to the extent practicable, micro‑purchases be distributed equitably among qualified suppliers. 2. 2 CFR § 200.214 subjects non‑Federal entities to the non-procurement suspension and debarment regulations in 2 CFR part 180, which restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from Federal awards. Under 2 CFR § 180.300, before entering into a covered transaction with another person or entity at the next lower tier, the non Federal entity must verify that the party is not excluded or disqualified. This verification may be completed by reviewing the SAM.gov Exclusions, obtaining a certification from the entity, or including an appropriate suspension and debarment clause or condition in the contract or agreement. Further, in accordance with 2 CFR § 200.318(i), non‑federal entities must maintain records sufficient to document the history of procurement transactions, and 2 CFR § 200.334 requires retention of all supporting documentation for Federal awards. Together, these regulations require that documentation of the suspension and debarment verification be retained to demonstrate compliance with Federal procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. Condition: 1. The Republic’s procurement regulation § 625(c)(3) permits purchases under $2,500 after obtaining one written price quotation. However, the policy does not demonstrate full and open competition to ensure that small purchases are distributed equitably among qualified suppliers. Of the 583 procurement transactions, 140 were identified as within the threshold established under § 625(c)(3). No. No. of Transactions General Ledger Account Name Amount 1 7 Boat Rentals $ 9,400 2 64 General Supplies 60,349 3 7 Advertising 1,045 4 6 Conference 11,800 5 1 All Other Purchased Serv 1,999 6 39 Vehicle Cycle Repair 7,987 7 12 Building/Space Rentals 5,830 8 4 Machinery & Equip Repair 837 Total: 140 $ 99,247 2. The Republic represents that vendors are verified in SAM.gov before entering into covered transactions; however, no documentation was retained to demonstrate that the required verification occurred. Documentation such as screenshots, printouts, approval records, or other system‑based evidence showing that the SAM.gov check was performed was not available in the procurement or vendor files. Of the 185 purchase orders issued during the year ended September 30, 2023, 19 were identified as covered transactions subject to federal suspension and debarment requirements, totaling $2,101,228, of which 12 totaling $1,919,175 were selected for testing. No. Purchase Order # Vendor Amount 1 22300843 MEDPHARM $ 93,032 2 22301907 PACIFIC SOURCE INC. LTD. 490,573 3 22301908 PACIFIC SOURCE INC. LTD. 512,382 4 22301909 PACIFIC SOURCE INC. LTD. 463,320 5 22302788 MEDPHARM 111,550 6 22300845 MD WHOLESALE 55,160 7 22301465 MD WHOLESALE 11,952 8 22302557 MD WHOLESALE 29,607 9 22302790 MEDPHARM 80,946 10 22303546 G&N CLEANING EXPRESS 16,560 11 22306254 ARC HEALTH 37,125 12 22307066 MD WHOLESALE 16,968 Total: $ 1,919,175 Auditor verification of the above vendors in SAM.gov did not identify any as suspended or debarred. However, the absence of documentation prevents the Republic from demonstrating compliance with Federal suspension and debarment requirements. Cause: The Republic’s procurement policy does not ensure full and open competition for small purchases and does not include procedures to equitably distribute micro‑purchases among qualified suppliers. Additionally, the Republic’s procurement and vendor compliance procedures do not require the retention of documentation evidencing that suspension and debarment checks were performed. Effect: The Republic is not in compliance with Federal procurement, suspension and debarment requirements. Without federally compliant procedures and supporting documentation, the extent of questioned costs cannot be determined, resulting in an undeterminable question cost. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Finding 2022-009 Recommendation: We recommend that the Republic update its procurement policies and procedures to include specific guidance to ensure full and open competition and to equitably distribute micro‑purchases among qualified suppliers. Management should ensure that documentation supporting the basis for supplier selection is consistently maintained in procurement files. Additionally, we recommend that the Republic strengthen its procurement and vendor‑approval procedures to require retention of evidence demonstrating that suspension and debarment verification was performed for each covered transaction. Acceptable documentation may include date‑stamped screenshots of the SAM.gov search, system‑generated verification logs, or signed certifications. Documentation should be consistently retained in the procurement or vendor file to support compliance with Federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The Republic’s Corrective Action Plan does not indicate disagreement and provides planned corrective action.
Criteria: 1. In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.319(a), all procurement transactions under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition. Further, 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(1)(i) requires that, to the extent practicable, micro‑purchases be distributed equitably among qualified suppliers. 2. 2 CFR § 200.214 subjects non‑Federal entities to the non-procurement suspension and debarment regulations in 2 CFR part 180, which restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from Federal awards. Under 2 CFR § 180.300, before entering into a covered transaction with another person or entity at the next lower tier, the non Federal entity must verify that the party is not excluded or disqualified. This verification may be completed by reviewing the SAM.gov Exclusions, obtaining a certification from the entity, or including an appropriate suspension and debarment clause or condition in the contract or agreement. Further, in accordance with 2 CFR § 200.318(i), non‑federal entities must maintain records sufficient to document the history of procurement transactions, and 2 CFR § 200.334 requires retention of all supporting documentation for Federal awards. Together, these regulations require that documentation of the suspension and debarment verification be retained to demonstrate compliance with Federal procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. Condition: 1. The Republic’s procurement regulation § 625(c)(3) permits small purchases under $2,500 after obtaining one written price quotation. However, the policy does not demonstrate full and open competition to ensure that micro‑purchases are distributed equitably among qualified suppliers. Of the 224 procurement transactions, 72 were identified as within the threshold established under § 625(c)(3). Condition, continued: No. No. of transactions General Ledger Account Name Amount 1 18 General Supplies $ 19,541 2 1 All Other Rentals 240 3 13 Freight 6,894 4 3 Boat Rentals 3,000 5 3 All Other Purchased Serv 1,635 6 3 Conference 6,463 7 5 Vehicle Cycle Repair 628 8 11 Advertising 4,309 9 1 Dues & Fees 700 10 3 Machinery & Equip Repair 899 11 11 Fuel & Other Pol Products 5,865 Total: 72 $ 50,174 2. The Republic represents that vendors are verified in SAM.gov before entering into covered transactions; however, no documentation was retained to demonstrate that the required verification occurred. Documentation such as screenshots, printouts, approval records, or other system‑based evidence showing that the SAM.gov check was performed was not available in the procurement or vendor files. Of the 70 purchase orders issued during the year ended September 30, 2023, 7 were identified as covered transactions subject to federal suspension and debarment requirements totaling $229,639. No. Purchase Order # Vendor Amount 1 22300343 TLAU T. RIDPATH $ 32,500 2 22301468 MD WHOLESALE 5,371 3 22302270 UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII - OFFICE OF RESEARCH SERVICES 59,738 4 22304018 JMI-EDISON 93,300 5 22304084 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION 7,500 6 22306331 BELAU MEDICAL CLINIC 21,870 7 22307680 DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY SERVICES, INC 9,360 Total: $ 229,639 Condition, continued: Auditor verification of the above vendors in SAM.gov not identify any as suspended or debarred. However, the absence of documentation prevents the Republic from demonstrating compliance with Federal suspension and debarment requirements. Cause: The Republic’s procurement policy does not ensure full and open competition for small purchases due to lack of procedures to equitably distribute small purchases among qualified suppliers. Additionally, the Republic’s procurement and vendor compliance procedures do not require the retention of documentation evidencing that suspension and debarment checks were performed. Effect: The Republic is not in compliance with Federal procurement, suspension and debarment requirements. Without federally compliant procedures and supporting documentation, the extent of questioned costs cannot be determined, resulting in an undeterminable question cost. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Republic update its procurement policies and procedures to include specific guidance to ensure full and open competition and to equitably distribute small purchases among available qualified suppliers. Management should ensure that documentation supporting the basis for supplier selection is consistently maintained in procurement files. Additionally, we recommend that the Republic strengthen its procurement and vendor‑approval procedures to require retention of evidence demonstrating that suspension and debarment verification was performed for each covered transaction. Acceptable documentation may include date‑stamped screenshots of the SAM.gov search, system‑generated verification logs, or signed certifications. Documentation should be consistently retained in the procurement or vendor file to support compliance with Federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The Republic’s Corrective Action Plan does not indicate disagreement and provides planned corrective action.
Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal Awards Finding Number: 2023‐001 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award Number: 21528001075902 Pass‐Through Agency: Texas Education Agency Questioned Costs: N/A Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Additionally, non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non‐federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non‐federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR §180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System of Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) or (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR §180.300). Condition The District did not follow Federal, State, and Board policies and regulations governing procurement. Cause The District official responsible for making the purchase was not aware of the procurement compliance requirements. Additionally, those responsible for approving the purchase did not verify compliance. Effect The District was not in compliance with Federal, State, and Board policies and regulations governing procurement. Context The District procured computers, software licenses, and charging carts in the amount of $356,747 using quotations rather than issuing a formal procurement. Furthermore, the District did not check whether the vendor was suspended or debarred. Recommendation District employees who are delegated the authority to procure goods and services should receive training on Federal, State, and Board procurement policies and procedures. Additionally, approvers of requisitions should ensure purchases exceeding the formal procurement threshold are appropriately procured in accordance with Federal, State and Board policies and regulations. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Program Name - COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, U.S. Department of Treasury, Assistance Listing Number 21.027 Finding Type – Material Weakness in internal control and material noncompliance Criteria – Per 2 CFR section 180.300, the Organization needs to ensure there is a process to verify subrecipients are responsible entities who are not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded, prior to entering into an agreement. Condition – During testing we noted the Organization did not retain support showing they had searched if an entity was debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Cause – Management wanted to quickly get funds to their subrecipients and failed to retain any documentation showing they performed a search verifying their subrecipients were not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded prior to issuing a contract with federal funds. Effect – If an Organization fails to verify a subrecipient's status, it is possible the Organization could engage with any entity that was debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs – None Context – Before awarding subrecipient contacts using federal funds, the Organization should verify the recipient has not been debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded per 2 CFR Sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300 and 48 CFR section 52.209-6. We selected ten subrecipients for testing and management was unable to provide their search verification. However based on our testing at SAM.GOV, we noted none of the ten subrecipients were debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. This results in no questioned costs. Recommendation – The Organization should expand its procedures to ensure support is retained showing the search results of its verification that every subrecipient is not debarred, suspected or otherwise excluded, before issuing a contract or subaward. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – KYD Network and the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Compliance Contractor will conduct a search to ensure all ARPA funded organizations have not been debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving federal funds prior to receiving ARPA summer program funds.
Program Name - COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, U.S. Department of Treasury, Assistance Listing Number 21.027 Finding Type – Material Weakness in internal control and material noncompliance Criteria – Per 2 CFR section 180.300, the Organization needs to ensure there is a process to verify subrecipients are responsible entities who are not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded, prior to entering into an agreement. Condition – During testing we noted the Organization did not retain support showing they had searched if an entity was debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Cause – Management wanted to quickly get funds to their subrecipients and failed to retain any documentation showing they performed a search verifying their subrecipients were not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded prior to issuing a contract with federal funds. Effect – If an Organization fails to verify a subrecipient's status, it is possible the Organization could engage with any entity that was debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs – None Context – Before awarding subrecipient contacts using federal funds, the Organization should verify the recipient has not been debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded per 2 CFR Sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300 and 48 CFR section 52.209-6. We selected ten subrecipients for testing and management was unable to provide their search verification. However based on our testing at SAM.GOV, we noted none of the ten subrecipients were debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. This results in no questioned costs. Recommendation – The Organization should expand its procedures to ensure support is retained showing the search results of its verification that every subrecipient is not debarred, suspected or otherwise excluded, before issuing a contract or subaward. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – KYD Network and the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Compliance Contractor will conduct a search to ensure all ARPA funded organizations have not been debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving federal funds prior to receiving ARPA summer program funds.
Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control for Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Health Center Program Cluster CFDA No. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. H80CS00438 and H8FCS40427 Criteria: The Organization is required to create a written procurement, suspension and debarment policy that complies with applicable federal requirements as indicated in 2 CFR 200.318 ‐200.326 and to follow this policy when procuring goods and services. Condition: During the testing performed, it was determined that documentation to support quotes, estimates, or closed bids were not maintained prior to entering into contracts. Additionally, documentation was not maintained to support that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: The Organization has designed internal controls over these areas; however, the controls did not operate as designed. Effect: Purchases were made that did not adhere to the Health Organization’s procurement, suspension and debarment policy. Questioned costs: n/a Context: The Organization did not maintain supporting documentation that management obtained price or rate quotes for purchases above the micro‐purchase threshold. In addition, the Health Center did not maintain documentation to support that the vendors were not suspended or debarred, however subsequent testing verified that none of the vendors selected for review were suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding. Procedures will be developed and staff will be trained to ensure future procurement, suspension and debarment transactions are identified and documentation is maintained to support the evaluation. Repeat Finding: n/a Recommendation: The Organization should review and update the procurement and suspension and debarment policies. Additionally, the Organization should provide training to staff on transactions that are covered by the procurement, suspension and debarment policies. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding. Procedures will be developed and staff will be trained to ensure future procurement, suspension and debarment transactions are identified and documentation is maintained to support the evaluation.
Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control for Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Health Center Program Cluster CFDA No. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. H80CS00438 and H8FCS40427 Criteria: The Organization is required to create a written procurement, suspension and debarment policy that complies with applicable federal requirements as indicated in 2 CFR 200.318 ‐200.326 and to follow this policy when procuring goods and services. Condition: During the testing performed, it was determined that documentation to support quotes, estimates, or closed bids were not maintained prior to entering into contracts. Additionally, documentation was not maintained to support that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: The Organization has designed internal controls over these areas; however, the controls did not operate as designed. Effect: Purchases were made that did not adhere to the Health Organization’s procurement, suspension and debarment policy. Questioned costs: n/a Context: The Organization did not maintain supporting documentation that management obtained price or rate quotes for purchases above the micro‐purchase threshold. In addition, the Health Center did not maintain documentation to support that the vendors were not suspended or debarred, however subsequent testing verified that none of the vendors selected for review were suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding. Procedures will be developed and staff will be trained to ensure future procurement, suspension and debarment transactions are identified and documentation is maintained to support the evaluation. Repeat Finding: n/a Recommendation: The Organization should review and update the procurement and suspension and debarment policies. Additionally, the Organization should provide training to staff on transactions that are covered by the procurement, suspension and debarment policies. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding. Procedures will be developed and staff will be trained to ensure future procurement, suspension and debarment transactions are identified and documentation is maintained to support the evaluation.
Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control for Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Health Center Program Cluster CFDA No. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. H80CS00438 and H8FCS40427 Criteria: The Organization is required to create a written procurement, suspension and debarment policy that complies with applicable federal requirements as indicated in 2 CFR 200.318 ‐200.326 and to follow this policy when procuring goods and services. Condition: During the testing performed, it was determined that documentation to support quotes, estimates, or closed bids were not maintained prior to entering into contracts. Additionally, documentation was not maintained to support that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: The Organization has designed internal controls over these areas; however, the controls did not operate as designed. Effect: Purchases were made that did not adhere to the Health Organization’s procurement, suspension and debarment policy. Questioned costs: n/a Context: The Organization did not maintain supporting documentation that management obtained price or rate quotes for purchases above the micro‐purchase threshold. In addition, the Health Center did not maintain documentation to support that the vendors were not suspended or debarred, however subsequent testing verified that none of the vendors selected for review were suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding. Procedures will be developed and staff will be trained to ensure future procurement, suspension and debarment transactions are identified and documentation is maintained to support the evaluation. Repeat Finding: n/a Recommendation: The Organization should review and update the procurement and suspension and debarment policies. Additionally, the Organization should provide training to staff on transactions that are covered by the procurement, suspension and debarment policies. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding. Procedures will be developed and staff will be trained to ensure future procurement, suspension and debarment transactions are identified and documentation is maintained to support the evaluation.
Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control for Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Health Center Program Cluster CFDA No. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. H80CS00438 and H8FCS40427 Criteria: The Organization is required to create a written procurement, suspension and debarment policy that complies with applicable federal requirements as indicated in 2 CFR 200.318 ‐200.326 and to follow this policy when procuring goods and services. Condition: During the testing performed, it was determined that documentation to support quotes, estimates, or closed bids were not maintained prior to entering into contracts. Additionally, documentation was not maintained to support that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: The Organization has designed internal controls over these areas; however, the controls did not operate as designed. Effect: Purchases were made that did not adhere to the Health Organization’s procurement, suspension and debarment policy. Questioned costs: n/a Context: The Organization did not maintain supporting documentation that management obtained price or rate quotes for purchases above the micro‐purchase threshold. In addition, the Health Center did not maintain documentation to support that the vendors were not suspended or debarred, however subsequent testing verified that none of the vendors selected for review were suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding. Procedures will be developed and staff will be trained to ensure future procurement, suspension and debarment transactions are identified and documentation is maintained to support the evaluation. Repeat Finding: n/a Recommendation: The Organization should review and update the procurement and suspension and debarment policies. Additionally, the Organization should provide training to staff on transactions that are covered by the procurement, suspension and debarment policies. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding. Procedures will be developed and staff will be trained to ensure future procurement, suspension and debarment transactions are identified and documentation is maintained to support the evaluation.
Finding 2023-001: Procurement United States Department of Agriculture – Child Nutrition Cluster United States Department of Agriculture – Child and Adult Care Food Program Criteria: The non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rational for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price (2 CFR section 200.318(i)). The non-federal entity must also establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) (2 CFR section 200.303(a)). Condition: Records detailing which vendors were contacted, when they were contacted, and support for the rationale in choosing the vendor, is not documented. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Management did not maintain a detailed history of procurement and did not document a review process. Effect: There is no reasonable assurance that the Organization managed the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Recommendation: Purchasers should record, and keep on file, backup detailing which vendors were contacted, when they were contacted, support for the rationale in choosing the vendor. Management should implement a system of internal controls for this process. Views of Responsible Parties and Corrective Action Plan: Management concurs with the finding and will implement a process for documenting the procurement history and establishing a system of internal controls.
Finding 2023-001: Procurement United States Department of Agriculture – Child Nutrition Cluster United States Department of Agriculture – Child and Adult Care Food Program Criteria: The non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rational for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price (2 CFR section 200.318(i)). The non-federal entity must also establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) (2 CFR section 200.303(a)). Condition: Records detailing which vendors were contacted, when they were contacted, and support for the rationale in choosing the vendor, is not documented. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Management did not maintain a detailed history of procurement and did not document a review process. Effect: There is no reasonable assurance that the Organization managed the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Recommendation: Purchasers should record, and keep on file, backup detailing which vendors were contacted, when they were contacted, support for the rationale in choosing the vendor. Management should implement a system of internal controls for this process. Views of Responsible Parties and Corrective Action Plan: Management concurs with the finding and will implement a process for documenting the procurement history and establishing a system of internal controls.
Finding 2023-001: Procurement United States Department of Agriculture – Child Nutrition Cluster United States Department of Agriculture – Child and Adult Care Food Program Criteria: The non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rational for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price (2 CFR section 200.318(i)). The non-federal entity must also establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) (2 CFR section 200.303(a)). Condition: Records detailing which vendors were contacted, when they were contacted, and support for the rationale in choosing the vendor, is not documented. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Management did not maintain a detailed history of procurement and did not document a review process. Effect: There is no reasonable assurance that the Organization managed the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Recommendation: Purchasers should record, and keep on file, backup detailing which vendors were contacted, when they were contacted, support for the rationale in choosing the vendor. Management should implement a system of internal controls for this process. Views of Responsible Parties and Corrective Action Plan: Management concurs with the finding and will implement a process for documenting the procurement history and establishing a system of internal controls.
Finding 2023-001: Procurement United States Department of Agriculture – Child Nutrition Cluster United States Department of Agriculture – Child and Adult Care Food Program Criteria: The non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rational for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price (2 CFR section 200.318(i)). The non-federal entity must also establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) (2 CFR section 200.303(a)). Condition: Records detailing which vendors were contacted, when they were contacted, and support for the rationale in choosing the vendor, is not documented. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Management did not maintain a detailed history of procurement and did not document a review process. Effect: There is no reasonable assurance that the Organization managed the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Recommendation: Purchasers should record, and keep on file, backup detailing which vendors were contacted, when they were contacted, support for the rationale in choosing the vendor. Management should implement a system of internal controls for this process. Views of Responsible Parties and Corrective Action Plan: Management concurs with the finding and will implement a process for documenting the procurement history and establishing a system of internal controls.
Finding 2023-001: Procurement United States Department of Agriculture – Child Nutrition Cluster United States Department of Agriculture – Child and Adult Care Food Program Criteria: The non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rational for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price (2 CFR section 200.318(i)). The non-federal entity must also establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) (2 CFR section 200.303(a)). Condition: Records detailing which vendors were contacted, when they were contacted, and support for the rationale in choosing the vendor, is not documented. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Management did not maintain a detailed history of procurement and did not document a review process. Effect: There is no reasonable assurance that the Organization managed the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Recommendation: Purchasers should record, and keep on file, backup detailing which vendors were contacted, when they were contacted, support for the rationale in choosing the vendor. Management should implement a system of internal controls for this process. Views of Responsible Parties and Corrective Action Plan: Management concurs with the finding and will implement a process for documenting the procurement history and establishing a system of internal controls.
Finding 2023-001: Procurement United States Department of Agriculture – Child Nutrition Cluster United States Department of Agriculture – Child and Adult Care Food Program Criteria: The non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rational for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price (2 CFR section 200.318(i)). The non-federal entity must also establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) (2 CFR section 200.303(a)). Condition: Records detailing which vendors were contacted, when they were contacted, and support for the rationale in choosing the vendor, is not documented. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Management did not maintain a detailed history of procurement and did not document a review process. Effect: There is no reasonable assurance that the Organization managed the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Recommendation: Purchasers should record, and keep on file, backup detailing which vendors were contacted, when they were contacted, support for the rationale in choosing the vendor. Management should implement a system of internal controls for this process. Views of Responsible Parties and Corrective Action Plan: Management concurs with the finding and will implement a process for documenting the procurement history and establishing a system of internal controls.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Findings and Questioned Costs Related to Federal Awards Finding Number: 2023‐001 Repeat Finding: No Program Name/Assistance Listing Title: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award Number: 21528001075902 Pass‐Through Agency: Texas Education Agency Questioned Costs: N/A Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria Non‐federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR §§200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Additionally, non‐federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non‐federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non‐federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR §180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System of Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) or (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR §180.300). Condition The District did not follow Federal, State, and Board policies and regulations governing procurement. Cause The District official responsible for making the purchase was not aware of the procurement compliance requirements. Additionally, those responsible for approving the purchase did not verify compliance. Effect The District was not in compliance with Federal, State, and Board policies and regulations governing procurement. Context The District procured computers, software licenses, and charging carts in the amount of $356,747 using quotations rather than issuing a formal procurement. Furthermore, the District did not check whether the vendor was suspended or debarred. Recommendation District employees who are delegated the authority to procure goods and services should receive training on Federal, State, and Board procurement policies and procedures. Additionally, approvers of requisitions should ensure purchases exceeding the formal procurement threshold are appropriately procured in accordance with Federal, State and Board policies and regulations. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan.
Program Name - COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, U.S. Department of Treasury, Assistance Listing Number 21.027 Finding Type – Material Weakness in internal control and material noncompliance Criteria – Per 2 CFR section 180.300, the Organization needs to ensure there is a process to verify subrecipients are responsible entities who are not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded, prior to entering into an agreement. Condition – During testing we noted the Organization did not retain support showing they had searched if an entity was debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Cause – Management wanted to quickly get funds to their subrecipients and failed to retain any documentation showing they performed a search verifying their subrecipients were not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded prior to issuing a contract with federal funds. Effect – If an Organization fails to verify a subrecipient's status, it is possible the Organization could engage with any entity that was debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs – None Context – Before awarding subrecipient contacts using federal funds, the Organization should verify the recipient has not been debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded per 2 CFR Sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300 and 48 CFR section 52.209-6. We selected ten subrecipients for testing and management was unable to provide their search verification. However based on our testing at SAM.GOV, we noted none of the ten subrecipients were debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. This results in no questioned costs. Recommendation – The Organization should expand its procedures to ensure support is retained showing the search results of its verification that every subrecipient is not debarred, suspected or otherwise excluded, before issuing a contract or subaward. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – KYD Network and the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Compliance Contractor will conduct a search to ensure all ARPA funded organizations have not been debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving federal funds prior to receiving ARPA summer program funds.
Program Name - COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, U.S. Department of Treasury, Assistance Listing Number 21.027 Finding Type – Material Weakness in internal control and material noncompliance Criteria – Per 2 CFR section 180.300, the Organization needs to ensure there is a process to verify subrecipients are responsible entities who are not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded, prior to entering into an agreement. Condition – During testing we noted the Organization did not retain support showing they had searched if an entity was debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Cause – Management wanted to quickly get funds to their subrecipients and failed to retain any documentation showing they performed a search verifying their subrecipients were not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded prior to issuing a contract with federal funds. Effect – If an Organization fails to verify a subrecipient's status, it is possible the Organization could engage with any entity that was debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs – None Context – Before awarding subrecipient contacts using federal funds, the Organization should verify the recipient has not been debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded per 2 CFR Sections 200.212, 200.318(h) and 180.300 and 48 CFR section 52.209-6. We selected ten subrecipients for testing and management was unable to provide their search verification. However based on our testing at SAM.GOV, we noted none of the ten subrecipients were debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. This results in no questioned costs. Recommendation – The Organization should expand its procedures to ensure support is retained showing the search results of its verification that every subrecipient is not debarred, suspected or otherwise excluded, before issuing a contract or subaward. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – KYD Network and the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Compliance Contractor will conduct a search to ensure all ARPA funded organizations have not been debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving federal funds prior to receiving ARPA summer program funds.
Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control for Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Health Center Program Cluster CFDA No. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. H80CS00438 and H8FCS40427 Criteria: The Organization is required to create a written procurement, suspension and debarment policy that complies with applicable federal requirements as indicated in 2 CFR 200.318 ‐200.326 and to follow this policy when procuring goods and services. Condition: During the testing performed, it was determined that documentation to support quotes, estimates, or closed bids were not maintained prior to entering into contracts. Additionally, documentation was not maintained to support that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: The Organization has designed internal controls over these areas; however, the controls did not operate as designed. Effect: Purchases were made that did not adhere to the Health Organization’s procurement, suspension and debarment policy. Questioned costs: n/a Context: The Organization did not maintain supporting documentation that management obtained price or rate quotes for purchases above the micro‐purchase threshold. In addition, the Health Center did not maintain documentation to support that the vendors were not suspended or debarred, however subsequent testing verified that none of the vendors selected for review were suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding. Procedures will be developed and staff will be trained to ensure future procurement, suspension and debarment transactions are identified and documentation is maintained to support the evaluation. Repeat Finding: n/a Recommendation: The Organization should review and update the procurement and suspension and debarment policies. Additionally, the Organization should provide training to staff on transactions that are covered by the procurement, suspension and debarment policies. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding. Procedures will be developed and staff will be trained to ensure future procurement, suspension and debarment transactions are identified and documentation is maintained to support the evaluation.
Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control for Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Health Center Program Cluster CFDA No. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. H80CS00438 and H8FCS40427 Criteria: The Organization is required to create a written procurement, suspension and debarment policy that complies with applicable federal requirements as indicated in 2 CFR 200.318 ‐200.326 and to follow this policy when procuring goods and services. Condition: During the testing performed, it was determined that documentation to support quotes, estimates, or closed bids were not maintained prior to entering into contracts. Additionally, documentation was not maintained to support that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: The Organization has designed internal controls over these areas; however, the controls did not operate as designed. Effect: Purchases were made that did not adhere to the Health Organization’s procurement, suspension and debarment policy. Questioned costs: n/a Context: The Organization did not maintain supporting documentation that management obtained price or rate quotes for purchases above the micro‐purchase threshold. In addition, the Health Center did not maintain documentation to support that the vendors were not suspended or debarred, however subsequent testing verified that none of the vendors selected for review were suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding. Procedures will be developed and staff will be trained to ensure future procurement, suspension and debarment transactions are identified and documentation is maintained to support the evaluation. Repeat Finding: n/a Recommendation: The Organization should review and update the procurement and suspension and debarment policies. Additionally, the Organization should provide training to staff on transactions that are covered by the procurement, suspension and debarment policies. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding. Procedures will be developed and staff will be trained to ensure future procurement, suspension and debarment transactions are identified and documentation is maintained to support the evaluation.
Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control for Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Health Center Program Cluster CFDA No. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. H80CS00438 and H8FCS40427 Criteria: The Organization is required to create a written procurement, suspension and debarment policy that complies with applicable federal requirements as indicated in 2 CFR 200.318 ‐200.326 and to follow this policy when procuring goods and services. Condition: During the testing performed, it was determined that documentation to support quotes, estimates, or closed bids were not maintained prior to entering into contracts. Additionally, documentation was not maintained to support that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: The Organization has designed internal controls over these areas; however, the controls did not operate as designed. Effect: Purchases were made that did not adhere to the Health Organization’s procurement, suspension and debarment policy. Questioned costs: n/a Context: The Organization did not maintain supporting documentation that management obtained price or rate quotes for purchases above the micro‐purchase threshold. In addition, the Health Center did not maintain documentation to support that the vendors were not suspended or debarred, however subsequent testing verified that none of the vendors selected for review were suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding. Procedures will be developed and staff will be trained to ensure future procurement, suspension and debarment transactions are identified and documentation is maintained to support the evaluation. Repeat Finding: n/a Recommendation: The Organization should review and update the procurement and suspension and debarment policies. Additionally, the Organization should provide training to staff on transactions that are covered by the procurement, suspension and debarment policies. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding. Procedures will be developed and staff will be trained to ensure future procurement, suspension and debarment transactions are identified and documentation is maintained to support the evaluation.
Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control for Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Health Center Program Cluster CFDA No. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. H80CS00438 and H8FCS40427 Criteria: The Organization is required to create a written procurement, suspension and debarment policy that complies with applicable federal requirements as indicated in 2 CFR 200.318 ‐200.326 and to follow this policy when procuring goods and services. Condition: During the testing performed, it was determined that documentation to support quotes, estimates, or closed bids were not maintained prior to entering into contracts. Additionally, documentation was not maintained to support that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: The Organization has designed internal controls over these areas; however, the controls did not operate as designed. Effect: Purchases were made that did not adhere to the Health Organization’s procurement, suspension and debarment policy. Questioned costs: n/a Context: The Organization did not maintain supporting documentation that management obtained price or rate quotes for purchases above the micro‐purchase threshold. In addition, the Health Center did not maintain documentation to support that the vendors were not suspended or debarred, however subsequent testing verified that none of the vendors selected for review were suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding. Procedures will be developed and staff will be trained to ensure future procurement, suspension and debarment transactions are identified and documentation is maintained to support the evaluation. Repeat Finding: n/a Recommendation: The Organization should review and update the procurement and suspension and debarment policies. Additionally, the Organization should provide training to staff on transactions that are covered by the procurement, suspension and debarment policies. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding. Procedures will be developed and staff will be trained to ensure future procurement, suspension and debarment transactions are identified and documentation is maintained to support the evaluation.
Finding 2023-001: Procurement United States Department of Agriculture – Child Nutrition Cluster United States Department of Agriculture – Child and Adult Care Food Program Criteria: The non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rational for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price (2 CFR section 200.318(i)). The non-federal entity must also establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) (2 CFR section 200.303(a)). Condition: Records detailing which vendors were contacted, when they were contacted, and support for the rationale in choosing the vendor, is not documented. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Management did not maintain a detailed history of procurement and did not document a review process. Effect: There is no reasonable assurance that the Organization managed the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Recommendation: Purchasers should record, and keep on file, backup detailing which vendors were contacted, when they were contacted, support for the rationale in choosing the vendor. Management should implement a system of internal controls for this process. Views of Responsible Parties and Corrective Action Plan: Management concurs with the finding and will implement a process for documenting the procurement history and establishing a system of internal controls.
Finding 2023-001: Procurement United States Department of Agriculture – Child Nutrition Cluster United States Department of Agriculture – Child and Adult Care Food Program Criteria: The non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rational for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price (2 CFR section 200.318(i)). The non-federal entity must also establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) (2 CFR section 200.303(a)). Condition: Records detailing which vendors were contacted, when they were contacted, and support for the rationale in choosing the vendor, is not documented. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Management did not maintain a detailed history of procurement and did not document a review process. Effect: There is no reasonable assurance that the Organization managed the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Recommendation: Purchasers should record, and keep on file, backup detailing which vendors were contacted, when they were contacted, support for the rationale in choosing the vendor. Management should implement a system of internal controls for this process. Views of Responsible Parties and Corrective Action Plan: Management concurs with the finding and will implement a process for documenting the procurement history and establishing a system of internal controls.