Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, and COVD-19 Summer School Food Service Program CFDA No. 10.555, and 10.559) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws, and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and testing of the major program, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Cost: None. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District is in a contract with Capital Region BOCES for the management of the school nutrition department. There were staff changes during the year and the new hire was unaware of the requirements. Cathy Meher, District Treasurer will meet with both the new Director and his supervisor at BOCES to relay the audit finding and develop a plan moving forward. This will happen immediately. Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over procurement, a selection of vendors charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. Of the District’s vendors charged to the program, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.
Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, and COVD-19 Summer School Food Service Program CFDA No. 10.555, and 10.559) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws, and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and testing of the major program, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Cost: None. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District is in a contract with Capital Region BOCES for the management of the school nutrition department. There were staff changes during the year and the new hire was unaware of the requirements. Cathy Meher, District Treasurer will meet with both the new Director and his supervisor at BOCES to relay the audit finding and develop a plan moving forward. This will happen immediately. Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over procurement, a selection of vendors charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. Of the District’s vendors charged to the program, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.
Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, and COVD-19 Summer School Food Service Program CFDA No. 10.555, and 10.559) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws, and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and testing of the major program, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Cost: None. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District is in a contract with Capital Region BOCES for the management of the school nutrition department. There were staff changes during the year and the new hire was unaware of the requirements. Cathy Meher, District Treasurer will meet with both the new Director and his supervisor at BOCES to relay the audit finding and develop a plan moving forward. This will happen immediately. Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over procurement, a selection of vendors charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. Of the District’s vendors charged to the program, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.
Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, and COVD-19 Summer School Food Service Program CFDA No. 10.555, and 10.559) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws, and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and testing of the major program, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Cost: None. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District is in a contract with Capital Region BOCES for the management of the school nutrition department. There were staff changes during the year and the new hire was unaware of the requirements. Cathy Meher, District Treasurer will meet with both the new Director and his supervisor at BOCES to relay the audit finding and develop a plan moving forward. This will happen immediately. Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over procurement, a selection of vendors charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. Of the District’s vendors charged to the program, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.
Program: Magnet Schools Assistance (Assistance Listing No. 84.165) Compliance Requirement – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Finding Type: Material Noncompliance / Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR Part 180.300 requires that when a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity and its principals, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, are not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/ (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity. In addition, under 2 CFR 200.318, the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. Condition: The Magnet Schools Assistance Program (MSAP) office did not verify that contracted vendors are not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in program transactions prior to their participation. In addition, the MSAP Director entered into a contract for services without having the authority to do so, thus circumventing the procurement procedures of the District. Cause: The MSAP office was unaware of the federal requirements related to verifying that contracted vendors are not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in program transactions. In addition, it appears that the MSAP Director felt her position provided her the authority to enter into contracts under her program, regardless of standard District procurement procedures. Effect: The failure to verify suspension and debarment can result in entering into prohibited transactions, leading to non-compliance and the loss of program funding. In addition, not following procurement procedures can result in prohibited transactions and the repayment of federal funds used. Auditor’s Recommendations: The MSAP office should familiarize themselves with federal compliance requirements including suspension and debarment. In addition, the MSAP office should ensure all transactions that do not qualify as “small-purchases” be procured by the District Procurement Department. Views of Responsible Official: The MSAP program will undergo specific training related to federal compliance including procurement, suspension and debarment. The District will implement additional monitoring procedures to ensure transactions that do not qualify as “small-purchases” be procured by the District Procurement Department.
2023-003 Procurement; Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services; Program: Social Services Research and Demonstration (ALN 93.647); Pass-through Entity: N/A; Federal Assistance Identification Number or Pass-Through Numbers: N/A; Federal Award Years: Year ended June 30, 2023; Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance; Other Matter Compliance Finding; Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires that each non-Federal entity must "Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award." 2 CFR 200.320 requires that each non-Federal entity must "have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award." Condition: While testing the procurement requirement, we were able to test compensating controls, but noted that internal controls were not properly designed over the procurement requirement. Prior to receiving federal funding beginning in August 2022, the program conducted a request for proposal (RFP) process and began contracting with a vendor. When federal funding was obtained, the vendor was not reevaluated in accordance with the Uniform Guidance to ensure the procurement requirements were being met. In addition, we noted UW Health – Madison’s procurement policy documents do not include all of the information that is required by the Uniform Guidance. Cause: Because the vendor was already in place for the program prior to receiving federal funds, management did not recognize the need to reevaluate the vendor under the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, management also did not recognize the need to include additional information in its procurement policy documents related to the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Without appropriate internal controls, there is an increased risk of noncompliance related to federal funding. Context: We identified and tested one vendor that was direct and material to the program and related to the procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. The sample size was based on guidance from chapter 11 of the AICPA Audit Guide, Government Auditing Standards and Single Audits.Questioned Costs: None. Repeat Finding?: No; Recommendation: While it was determined that the requirements of the Uniform Guidance were met related to the vendor tested, we suggest that management reevaluate all vendors that were previously used prior to receiving federal funding. In addition, we recommend that management update its procurement policies to incorporate the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. View of responsible officials of the auditee: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury, Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Listing Number: 21.027, 93.243 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79TI080926, 2023 Pass-Through Agency: City of Hartford, Career Resources Inc. Pass-Through Number: C2212 Award Period: 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition: The procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None Context: We reviewed the procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization and noted that the policies do not include the essential compliance elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the new procurement standards. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and conflict of interest policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury, Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Listing Number: 21.027, 93.243 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79TI080926, 2023 Pass-Through Agency: City of Hartford, Career Resources Inc. Pass-Through Number: C2212 Award Period: 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition: The procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None Context: We reviewed the procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization and noted that the policies do not include the essential compliance elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the new procurement standards. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and conflict of interest policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury, Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Listing Number: 21.027, 93.243 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79TI080926, 2023 Pass-Through Agency: City of Hartford, Career Resources Inc. Pass-Through Number: C2212 Award Period: 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition: The procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None Context: We reviewed the procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization and noted that the policies do not include the essential compliance elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the new procurement standards. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and conflict of interest policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. Additionally, the non-federal entity is required to follow formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or service under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. Furthermore, the District must adhere to the Pennsylvania Public School Code 24 P.S. 1-10, 7-751 and 8-807.1 when procuring goods and services to remain in compliance with commonwealth procurement requirements. Condition: The District did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with the procurement requirements as established by Uniform Guidance and Pennsylvania Public School Code. Cause and Effect: The District has utilized a vendor to purchase online learning products without obtaining formal bids and therefore didn’t following the Districts procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standard of the Uniform Guidance and Pennsylvania Public School Code. Questioned Cost: None Context: During testing, it was noted that the District had purchased online learning products from a vendor without following its procurement policy. This was an isolated instance within the scope of the tested population. Identification of Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District ensure it complies with its written procurement policy. The District should document its process and how it complies with the procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will establish processes to ensure that the procurement policy is followed when applicable and necessary.
Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. Additionally, the non-federal entity is required to follow formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or service under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. Furthermore, the District must adhere to the Pennsylvania Public School Code 24 P.S. 1-10, 7-751 and 8-807.1 when procuring goods and services to remain in compliance with commonwealth procurement requirements. Condition: The District did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with the procurement requirements as established by Uniform Guidance and Pennsylvania Public School Code. Cause and Effect: The District has utilized a vendor to purchase online learning products without obtaining formal bids and therefore didn’t following the Districts procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standard of the Uniform Guidance and Pennsylvania Public School Code. Questioned Cost: None Context: During testing, it was noted that the District had purchased online learning products from a vendor without following its procurement policy. This was an isolated instance within the scope of the tested population. Identification of Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District ensure it complies with its written procurement policy. The District should document its process and how it complies with the procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will establish processes to ensure that the procurement policy is followed when applicable and necessary.
Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. Additionally, the non-federal entity is required to follow formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or service under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. Furthermore, the District must adhere to the Pennsylvania Public School Code 24 P.S. 1-10, 7-751 and 8-807.1 when procuring goods and services to remain in compliance with commonwealth procurement requirements. Condition: The District did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with the procurement requirements as established by Uniform Guidance and Pennsylvania Public School Code. Cause and Effect: The District has utilized a vendor to purchase online learning products without obtaining formal bids and therefore didn’t following the Districts procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standard of the Uniform Guidance and Pennsylvania Public School Code. Questioned Cost: None Context: During testing, it was noted that the District had purchased online learning products from a vendor without following its procurement policy. This was an isolated instance within the scope of the tested population. Identification of Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District ensure it complies with its written procurement policy. The District should document its process and how it complies with the procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will establish processes to ensure that the procurement policy is followed when applicable and necessary.
Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. Additionally, the non-federal entity is required to follow formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or service under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. Furthermore, the District must adhere to the Pennsylvania Public School Code 24 P.S. 1-10, 7-751 and 8-807.1 when procuring goods and services to remain in compliance with commonwealth procurement requirements. Condition: The District did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with the procurement requirements as established by Uniform Guidance and Pennsylvania Public School Code. Cause and Effect: The District has utilized a vendor to purchase online learning products without obtaining formal bids and therefore didn’t following the Districts procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standard of the Uniform Guidance and Pennsylvania Public School Code. Questioned Cost: None Context: During testing, it was noted that the District had purchased online learning products from a vendor without following its procurement policy. This was an isolated instance within the scope of the tested population. Identification of Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District ensure it complies with its written procurement policy. The District should document its process and how it complies with the procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will establish processes to ensure that the procurement policy is followed when applicable and necessary.
Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. Additionally, the non-federal entity is required to follow formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or service under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. Furthermore, the District must adhere to the Pennsylvania Public School Code 24 P.S. 1-10, 7-751 and 8-807.1 when procuring goods and services to remain in compliance with commonwealth procurement requirements. Condition: The District did not follow the appropriate procedures to comply with the procurement requirements as established by Uniform Guidance and Pennsylvania Public School Code. Cause and Effect: The District has utilized a vendor to purchase online learning products without obtaining formal bids and therefore didn’t following the Districts procurement policy and ultimately did not comply with the standard of the Uniform Guidance and Pennsylvania Public School Code. Questioned Cost: None Context: During testing, it was noted that the District had purchased online learning products from a vendor without following its procurement policy. This was an isolated instance within the scope of the tested population. Identification of Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District ensure it complies with its written procurement policy. The District should document its process and how it complies with the procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will establish processes to ensure that the procurement policy is followed when applicable and necessary.
2023-003: Written Policy for Debarred, Suspended Vendors Federal Assistance listing Number: 84.371 Compliance Area: Procurement & Suspension & Debarment (I) Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Criteria: The District should have written standards of conduct in place to verify any entity (vendor) with which the District spends Federal expenditures or conducts business transactions be not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded per 2 CFR 200.318(h) and 2 CFR 180. The written standard should address conduct covering conflicts of interest governing the performance of its employees and contractors engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts (Uniform Guidance Section 200.318(c) and 45 CFR sections 52.203-13 and 52.203-16). Condition: During our audit, we found that the District did not have written controls in place to ensure that vendors were not suspended, debarred, or included on the list of vendors prior to entering into a contract. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the District put written internal controls in place such as using a checklist to ensure Federal funds that pay contractors are not suspended or debarred and adopts a formal policy on procurment for debarment.
Finding 2023-003 Material weakness in internal control over compliance with procurement procedures meeting the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200. Federal Agency: United States Department of State Program Titles: Office of Global Women’s Issues Assistance Listing Number: 19.801 Pass-Through Entity: N/A Award Numbers: SLMAQM21CA3275 Award Periods: September 30, 2021 through September 30, 2025 Criteria Internal controls requirements contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance) , Subpart D ‐ Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.318 through 200.326 Internal Controls, require that a non‐Federal entity use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirement identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A nonfederal entity among others must: - Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). Under the micro-purchase method, the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000 ($2,000 in the case of acquisition for construction subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (Davis-Bacon Act)). Small purchase procedures are used for purchases that exceed the micro-purchase amount but do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-federal entity considers the price to be reasonable (2 CFR section 200.320(a)). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR section 200.320(b)). - For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). Condition/Context Although the Organization has a procurement policy, and the procedures include the use of a micro purchase threshold of $3,500, small purchases and simplified acquisition thresholds are not clearly identified. As such, the policy does not fully incorporate the procurement standards of the Uniform Guidance including sealed bids, cost or price analysis etc. Cause The Organization's management was not aware that all components including procurement methods of 2 CFR section 200.320 are required to be included in the Organization's procurement policy even if the Organization's procurements would not typically include all procurement methods. Effect The Organization did not ensure that its procurement policy follows the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR Part 200. Questioned Costs Not determinable. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation We recommend the Organization implement measures to ensure that its procurement policy reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations and conform to applicable federal statutes and requirements in 2 CFR Part 200. Views of Responsible Individual and Corrective Action Plan Management agrees with the finding and has provided the accompanying corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A210087 and H173A180086 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Numbers: Unknown Award Period: Fiscal Year 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria: The District should have controls in place to ensure compliance per the requirements of 2 CFR §200.303. 2 CFR §200.318 - §200.321 requires that all procurement transactions be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of the section. Procurement by noncompetitive proposals may be utilized if the item is available only from a single source, however efforts must be made and the process fully documented in order to conclude that the use of a sole source procurement is appropriate. Condition: It was noted during procurement testing that, for one contract, the District did not utilize quotes, sealed bids, or competitive proposals for the noted procurement, and any sole course conclusions were also not documented. Questioned Costs: ALN 84.027 and 84.173, Federal Award Identification Number H027A220087 and H173A180086: $4,502 Context: Of the two procurements tested in the Special Education Cluster, one was missing documentation to support a proper procurement method. Cause: The District procedures do not contain sufficient guidelines for ensuring all procurements utilize the proper method and are properly documented. Effect: The lack of proper methods and documentation could lead to using vendors for small purchase acquisitions without ensuring comparable pricing from other vendors and justifying costs. Repeat Finding: Yes – 2022-002. Recommendation: CLA recommends the District puts in place the proper procedures for sufficiently documenting all procurements and methodology used. View of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A210087 and H173A180086 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Numbers: Unknown Award Period: Fiscal Year 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria: The District should have controls in place to ensure compliance per the requirements of 2 CFR §200.303. 2 CFR §200.318 - §200.321 requires that all procurement transactions be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of the section. Procurement by noncompetitive proposals may be utilized if the item is available only from a single source, however efforts must be made and the process fully documented in order to conclude that the use of a sole source procurement is appropriate. Condition: It was noted during procurement testing that, for one contract, the District did not utilize quotes, sealed bids, or competitive proposals for the noted procurement, and any sole course conclusions were also not documented. Questioned Costs: ALN 84.027 and 84.173, Federal Award Identification Number H027A220087 and H173A180086: $4,502 Context: Of the two procurements tested in the Special Education Cluster, one was missing documentation to support a proper procurement method. Cause: The District procedures do not contain sufficient guidelines for ensuring all procurements utilize the proper method and are properly documented. Effect: The lack of proper methods and documentation could lead to using vendors for small purchase acquisitions without ensuring comparable pricing from other vendors and justifying costs. Repeat Finding: Yes – 2022-002. Recommendation: CLA recommends the District puts in place the proper procedures for sufficiently documenting all procurements and methodology used. View of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A210087 and H173A180086 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Numbers: Unknown Award Period: Fiscal Year 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria: The District should have controls in place to ensure compliance per the requirements of 2 CFR §200.303. 2 CFR §200.318 - §200.321 requires that all procurement transactions be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of the section. Procurement by noncompetitive proposals may be utilized if the item is available only from a single source, however efforts must be made and the process fully documented in order to conclude that the use of a sole source procurement is appropriate. Condition: It was noted during procurement testing that, for one contract, the District did not utilize quotes, sealed bids, or competitive proposals for the noted procurement, and any sole course conclusions were also not documented. Questioned Costs: ALN 84.027 and 84.173, Federal Award Identification Number H027A220087 and H173A180086: $4,502 Context: Of the two procurements tested in the Special Education Cluster, one was missing documentation to support a proper procurement method. Cause: The District procedures do not contain sufficient guidelines for ensuring all procurements utilize the proper method and are properly documented. Effect: The lack of proper methods and documentation could lead to using vendors for small purchase acquisitions without ensuring comparable pricing from other vendors and justifying costs. Repeat Finding: Yes – 2022-002. Recommendation: CLA recommends the District puts in place the proper procedures for sufficiently documenting all procurements and methodology used. View of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 and 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H027A210087 and H173A180086 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Numbers: Unknown Award Period: Fiscal Year 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria: The District should have controls in place to ensure compliance per the requirements of 2 CFR §200.303. 2 CFR §200.318 - §200.321 requires that all procurement transactions be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of the section. Procurement by noncompetitive proposals may be utilized if the item is available only from a single source, however efforts must be made and the process fully documented in order to conclude that the use of a sole source procurement is appropriate. Condition: It was noted during procurement testing that, for one contract, the District did not utilize quotes, sealed bids, or competitive proposals for the noted procurement, and any sole course conclusions were also not documented. Questioned Costs: ALN 84.027 and 84.173, Federal Award Identification Number H027A220087 and H173A180086: $4,502 Context: Of the two procurements tested in the Special Education Cluster, one was missing documentation to support a proper procurement method. Cause: The District procedures do not contain sufficient guidelines for ensuring all procurements utilize the proper method and are properly documented. Effect: The lack of proper methods and documentation could lead to using vendors for small purchase acquisitions without ensuring comparable pricing from other vendors and justifying costs. Repeat Finding: Yes – 2022-002. Recommendation: CLA recommends the District puts in place the proper procedures for sufficiently documenting all procurements and methodology used. View of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
The Christian County Fiscal Court Did Not Have Adequate Controls Over The Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Compliance Requirement On Federal Expenditures Federal Program: Assistance Listing #21.027 COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Award Number and Year: Information not available Name of Federal Agency and Pass-Thru Agency (if applicable): U.S. Department of Treasury Compliance Requirements: Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness Amount of Questioned Costs: $0 Opinion Modification (if applicable): No COVID Related: Yes The Christian County Fiscal Court failed to implement adequate controls over Procurement, Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF). The disbursement of the SLFRF monies was not handled in the manner prescribed by the county’s administrative code. Three disbursements totaling $1,378,654 were tested and purchase orders were not utilized for any of the three disbursements. The fiscal court also failed to document adequate controls concerning the compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. There was no documentation that suspension and debarment compliance requirements were followed. The county’s contracts with local utilities failed to include suspension and debarment requirements. Additionally, there was no documentation that a search for suspended or debarred parties was performed prior to disbursing the funds to the utilities. The county treasurer was not aware purchase orders were not issued. Preprinted purchase orders for the ARPA (SLFRF) Fund were not available for use. There was a breakdown in the verification process of debarred or suspended parties. Since the fiscal court did not issue purchase orders for the disbursements from the SLFRF monies, amounts spent could have exceeded budgetary restrictions, rendering them void. Additionally, because there was no documented search for suspended or debarred parties, ineligible vendors or contractors could have been utilized putting the county at risk for being held responsible for unallowed or questioned costs. 2 CFR 200.318(a) states “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward.” The Christian County Administrative Code section 4.5 states for claims against Christian County “Each claim shall be recorded by date, receipts, and purchase order number and presented to the Fiscal Court at its next meeting.” Additionally, the Department of Local Government (DLG) requires counties to implement a purchase order system which includes issuing purchase orders for all claims expended from the county’s budget. Good internal controls require the use of established procurement policies to ensure that federal disbursements are handled in the manner consistent with the treatment of non-federal disbursements. 2 CFR 200.214 states “Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.” Good internal controls dictate documentation be maintained that verifies debarment and suspension regulations have been communicated and followed for vendors or contractors used in federally funded projects. We recommend that the county improve internal controls over federal expenditures to ensure all compliance requirements are followed. This is not a repeat finding from the previous year.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027/84.173 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-SDE64370-20977/20983 Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency of Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: The BOE must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) Condition: The BOE procurement standards did not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Although the BOE did not have a policy in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the BOE did follow Uniform Guidance and was in compliance with the major program. Cause: The policy has not been updated to be in compliance with uniform guidance requirements. Effect: The lack of controls over reporting could result in errors of reported data. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the BOE review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditors’ recommendations.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027/84.173 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-SDE64370-20977/20983 Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency of Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: The BOE must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) Condition: The BOE procurement standards did not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Although the BOE did not have a policy in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the BOE did follow Uniform Guidance and was in compliance with the major program. Cause: The policy has not been updated to be in compliance with uniform guidance requirements. Effect: The lack of controls over reporting could result in errors of reported data. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the BOE review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditors’ recommendations.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027/84.173 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-SDE64370-20977/20983 Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency of Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: The BOE must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) Condition: The BOE procurement standards did not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Although the BOE did not have a policy in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the BOE did follow Uniform Guidance and was in compliance with the major program. Cause: The policy has not been updated to be in compliance with uniform guidance requirements. Effect: The lack of controls over reporting could result in errors of reported data. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the BOE review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditors’ recommendations.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027/84.173 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-SDE64370-20977/20983 Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency of Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: The BOE must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) Condition: The BOE procurement standards did not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Although the BOE did not have a policy in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the BOE did follow Uniform Guidance and was in compliance with the major program. Cause: The policy has not been updated to be in compliance with uniform guidance requirements. Effect: The lack of controls over reporting could result in errors of reported data. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the BOE review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditors’ recommendations.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027/84.173 Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-SDE64370-20977/20983 Award Period: July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency of Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: The BOE must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) Condition: The BOE procurement standards did not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Although the BOE did not have a policy in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the BOE did follow Uniform Guidance and was in compliance with the major program. Cause: The policy has not been updated to be in compliance with uniform guidance requirements. Effect: The lack of controls over reporting could result in errors of reported data. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the BOE review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditors’ recommendations.
FINDING 2023-001 PROCUREMENT SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Charter Schools Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.282A Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.318, “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §200.317 through 200.327.” Condition The School’s procurement policies do not include wording or procedures to ensure the School is complying with the above standard. Cause A responsible individual is not monitoring Federal regulations to ensure the School’s procurement procedures are properly documented and in line with the regulations. Effect Not documenting these procedures could result in the School completing procurement transactions that are not in compliance with Federal regulations. Recommendation We recommend the School develop a written procurement policy that incorporates the Federal regulations identified above. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 22
2023-001 PROCUREMENT Federal Program Information: Federal Transit Cluster 20.507 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.318(h) states “the non-federal entity must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources.” Condition: For all of the contracts selected for testing, documentation could not be located to support that the Authority verified the entity it planned to enter into a covered transaction with was not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: Total federal expenditures for the Federal Transit Cluster were $10,065,940 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Cause: The Authority did not retain adequate documentation showing entities were not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with the federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal award. Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority implement controls to ensure that entities are not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded and that adequate supporting documentation is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials: Management acknowledges the finding. See corrective action plan.
2023-001 PROCUREMENT Federal Program Information: Federal Transit Cluster 20.507 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.318(h) states “the non-federal entity must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources.” Condition: For all of the contracts selected for testing, documentation could not be located to support that the Authority verified the entity it planned to enter into a covered transaction with was not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: Total federal expenditures for the Federal Transit Cluster were $10,065,940 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Cause: The Authority did not retain adequate documentation showing entities were not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with the federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal award. Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority implement controls to ensure that entities are not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded and that adequate supporting documentation is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials: Management acknowledges the finding. See corrective action plan.
2023-001 PROCUREMENT Federal Program Information: Federal Transit Cluster 20.507 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.318(h) states “the non-federal entity must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources.” Condition: For all of the contracts selected for testing, documentation could not be located to support that the Authority verified the entity it planned to enter into a covered transaction with was not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: Total federal expenditures for the Federal Transit Cluster were $10,065,940 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Cause: The Authority did not retain adequate documentation showing entities were not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with the federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal award. Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority implement controls to ensure that entities are not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded and that adequate supporting documentation is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials: Management acknowledges the finding. See corrective action plan.
2023-001 PROCUREMENT Federal Program Information: Federal Transit Cluster 20.507 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.318(h) states “the non-federal entity must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources.” Condition: For all of the contracts selected for testing, documentation could not be located to support that the Authority verified the entity it planned to enter into a covered transaction with was not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: Total federal expenditures for the Federal Transit Cluster were $10,065,940 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Cause: The Authority did not retain adequate documentation showing entities were not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with the federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal award. Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority implement controls to ensure that entities are not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded and that adequate supporting documentation is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials: Management acknowledges the finding. See corrective action plan.
2023-001 PROCUREMENT Federal Program Information: Federal Transit Cluster 20.507 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.318(h) states “the non-federal entity must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources.” Condition: For all of the contracts selected for testing, documentation could not be located to support that the Authority verified the entity it planned to enter into a covered transaction with was not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: Total federal expenditures for the Federal Transit Cluster were $10,065,940 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Cause: The Authority did not retain adequate documentation showing entities were not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with the federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal award. Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority implement controls to ensure that entities are not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded and that adequate supporting documentation is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials: Management acknowledges the finding. See corrective action plan.
2023-001 PROCUREMENT Federal Program Information: Federal Transit Cluster 20.507 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.318(h) states “the non-federal entity must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources.” Condition: For all of the contracts selected for testing, documentation could not be located to support that the Authority verified the entity it planned to enter into a covered transaction with was not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: Total federal expenditures for the Federal Transit Cluster were $10,065,940 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Cause: The Authority did not retain adequate documentation showing entities were not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with the federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal award. Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority implement controls to ensure that entities are not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded and that adequate supporting documentation is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials: Management acknowledges the finding. See corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow its procedures as they relate to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major program. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy during the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow its procedures as they relate to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major program. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy during the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow its procedures as they relate to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major program. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy during the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow its procedures as they relate to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major program. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy during the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow its procedures as they relate to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major program. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy during the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow its procedures as they relate to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major program. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy during the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow its procedures as they relate to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major program. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy during the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow its procedures as they relate to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major program. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy during the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow its procedures as they relate to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major program. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy during the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow its procedures as they relate to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major program. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy during the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow its procedures as they relate to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major program. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy during the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow its procedures as they relate to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major program. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy during the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow its procedures as they relate to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major program. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy during the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Federal Agency: All Federal Agencies Federal Program Name: All Federal Programs Assistance Listing Number: All Assistance Listing Numbers Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A – applies to all Federal Programs Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters (Noncompliance) Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UG) requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Condition: The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow its procedures as they relate to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major program. Cause: The City did not have the resources necessary to implement a conforming policy during the fiscal year under audit. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the City is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: Yes, repeat of finding 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
2023-001 Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) - COVID-19 HEERF Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs) Federal Assistance Listing Number: 84.425L Award Year: July 6, 2020 – June 30, 2023 Condition: The University's procurement policy does not contain adequate documentation to demonstrate compliance with federal procurement regulations (Deficiency). Questioned Costs: None. Context: The University's documented procurement policies do not contain all the specific requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Effect: The risks exist that the University could follow their procurement policy and procure an item with federal funds, which would not meet the federal procurement regulations. Cause: The writing of the policy did not take into account the federal procurement regulations which are required to be incorporated for items procured with federal funds. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the University revise procurement policies to incorporate all required elements of the federal procurement regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The University agrees with the comment and will revise procurement policies and incorporate all required elements of the federal procurement regulations.
FINDING: 2023-003 – Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture & U.S. Department of Education Federal Program: Child Nutrition Cluster & Special Education Cluster CFDA Numbers: 10.555 & 84.027 and 84.173 Pass Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass Through Number: 01-0276-000-000, H027A220087, H027X210087, H173A220086, and H173X210086 Award Periods: Fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR §200.318 - §200.321 requires that all procurement transactions be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of the section. Procurement by noncompetitive proposals may be utilized if the item is available only from a single source, however efforts must be made and the process fully documented in order to conclude that the use of a sole source procurement is appropriate. Condition: It was noted during procurement testing that the district did not document its process for concluding that procurements met the requirements of being a sole source situation. Questioned Costs: ALN 10.555 - $19,122.61 and ALN 84.027 and 84.173 - $68,100. Context: Of the 13 procurement transactions tested, 2 of them were considered sole source by the District but did not have the proper documentation to support the process used to determine that. Effect: The District was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements for the proper documentation of all procurement transactions. Repeat Finding: Yes. 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend the District reviews its procedures and controls over procurement to ensure that all procurements are documented such that a third party can clearly see and understand the detailed history of the procurement. Views of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. The District will implement procedures to document its rationale for the procurement method used.
FINDING: 2023-003 – Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture & U.S. Department of Education Federal Program: Child Nutrition Cluster & Special Education Cluster CFDA Numbers: 10.555 & 84.027 and 84.173 Pass Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass Through Number: 01-0276-000-000, H027A220087, H027X210087, H173A220086, and H173X210086 Award Periods: Fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR §200.318 - §200.321 requires that all procurement transactions be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of the section. Procurement by noncompetitive proposals may be utilized if the item is available only from a single source, however efforts must be made and the process fully documented in order to conclude that the use of a sole source procurement is appropriate. Condition: It was noted during procurement testing that the district did not document its process for concluding that procurements met the requirements of being a sole source situation. Questioned Costs: ALN 10.555 - $19,122.61 and ALN 84.027 and 84.173 - $68,100. Context: Of the 13 procurement transactions tested, 2 of them were considered sole source by the District but did not have the proper documentation to support the process used to determine that. Effect: The District was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements for the proper documentation of all procurement transactions. Repeat Finding: Yes. 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend the District reviews its procedures and controls over procurement to ensure that all procurements are documented such that a third party can clearly see and understand the detailed history of the procurement. Views of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. The District will implement procedures to document its rationale for the procurement method used.