Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
56,320
In database
Filtered Results
53,335
Matching current filters
Showing Page
565 of 2134
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Finding 554300 (2024-002)
Significant Deficiency 2024
The City will develop, document, and implement formal grant summary requirements review process and audit preparedness policy and procedures. The responsibilities, deliverables, and deadlines will be clearly outlined and communicated to all staff members. The City will remedy the customer account cr...
The City will develop, document, and implement formal grant summary requirements review process and audit preparedness policy and procedures. The responsibilities, deliverables, and deadlines will be clearly outlined and communicated to all staff members. The City will remedy the customer account credit balances by October 2025. Management intends to review and adjust the customer account balances.
View Audit 352902 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 554299 (2024-001)
Significant Deficiency 2024
The City will develop, document, and implement a formal year-end closing process and audit preparedness policy and procedures. The responsibilities, deliverables, and deadlines will be clearly outlined and communicated to all staff members. The City remedied the delinquent ARPA SLFRF quarterly P&E R...
The City will develop, document, and implement a formal year-end closing process and audit preparedness policy and procedures. The responsibilities, deliverables, and deadlines will be clearly outlined and communicated to all staff members. The City remedied the delinquent ARPA SLFRF quarterly P&E Report to the Treasury in January 2024, covering July 1, 2022, through December 31, 2023. Management intends to fully expend the remaining ARPA SLFRF award in FY24 and file the required quarterly P&E Reports in April 2024 and the final report in July 2024.
Significant Deficiency over Procurement Contact Person Responsible for the Corrective Action Plan: William Roberson, Financial Services Director Corrective Action Plan: The County identified a problem during the fiscal year, corrected the issue during the fiscal year, and shared the information with...
Significant Deficiency over Procurement Contact Person Responsible for the Corrective Action Plan: William Roberson, Financial Services Director Corrective Action Plan: The County identified a problem during the fiscal year, corrected the issue during the fiscal year, and shared the information with the audit team. Procurement for the new radio read water meters began with informal solicitation of pricing during the prior administration which ended in February 2023. The lack of formal procurement was identified as an issue by the interim county manager and recommended that the County reject the three informal bids. Subsequently, the County initiated a formal procurement process and is documented in meeting minutes, and a copy of County Administration’s memorandum to the Board of Commissioners was shared with the audit staff early in the audit process. The project was approved and contract awarded on July 5, 2024. Anticipated Completion Date: Completed
Recommendation: Review of vendors suspension and debarment should be done prior to entering into a contract or obtaining goods or services. Management Response: The City has worked and will continue to work diligently on this issue. The City is working to ensure that all vendors are properly reviewe...
Recommendation: Review of vendors suspension and debarment should be done prior to entering into a contract or obtaining goods or services. Management Response: The City has worked and will continue to work diligently on this issue. The City is working to ensure that all vendors are properly reviewed for suspension and debarment on an ongoing basis. Responsible Parties: Brittany Retherford, City Manager, Nick Walsh, Comptroller, and Mindy Brown, Assistant Comptroller Anticipated Completion Date: September 30, 2025
Recommendation: Review of reports should be documented prior to submission to the grantor. Management Response: The City has worked and will continue to work diligently on this issue. The City is working to ensure that all reports are properly reviewed prior to submission and that evidence of the re...
Recommendation: Review of reports should be documented prior to submission to the grantor. Management Response: The City has worked and will continue to work diligently on this issue. The City is working to ensure that all reports are properly reviewed prior to submission and that evidence of the review process is properly documented. Responsible Parties: Brittany Retherford, City Manager, Nick Walsh, Comptroller, and Mindy Brown, Assistant Comptroller Anticipated Completion Date: September 30, 2025
Recommendation: The City should create a process to alert/remind management and City officials to meet the reporting requirements and deadlines. Corrective Action: The City recognizes the need for timely grant reporting and has recently added a Grants Administrator position to the Finance Department...
Recommendation: The City should create a process to alert/remind management and City officials to meet the reporting requirements and deadlines. Corrective Action: The City recognizes the need for timely grant reporting and has recently added a Grants Administrator position to the Finance Department who has created a grant report tracking process. Responsible Parties: Candice Blake, Finance Director Anticipated Completion Date: September 30, 2025
The Corporation, through various efforts of management, has begun to start receiving past due rental assistance payments from HUD and will make the required deposits as cash flow permits.
The Corporation, through various efforts of management, has begun to start receiving past due rental assistance payments from HUD and will make the required deposits as cash flow permits.
View Audit 352863 Questioned Costs: $1
The Corporation, through various efforts of management, has begun to start receiving past due rental assistance payments from HUD and will make the required deposits as cash flow permits.
The Corporation, through various efforts of management, has begun to start receiving past due rental assistance payments from HUD and will make the required deposits as cash flow permits.
View Audit 352863 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 2024-001: During the year ended December 31 2024 reserve deposits totaling $45256 were not made as required by the regulatory agreement (1) Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation: The Organization did not have sufficient cash flow to make the required deposits. The management agent ...
Finding 2024-001: During the year ended December 31 2024 reserve deposits totaling $45256 were not made as required by the regulatory agreement (1) Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation: The Organization did not have sufficient cash flow to make the required deposits. The management agent has reflected the delinquent reserve payments as payable at December 31 2024 and is making deposits as cash flow allows; (2) Actions Taken on the Finding: The Organization obtained a 6 month suspension of deposits and is making the delinquent deposits as cash flow allows
View Audit 352857 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 2024-001: During the year ended December 31 2024 reserve deposits totaling $9000 were not made as required by the regulatory agreement. (1) Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation: The Organization did not have sufficient cash flow to make the required deposits. The management agent ...
Finding 2024-001: During the year ended December 31 2024 reserve deposits totaling $9000 were not made as required by the regulatory agreement. (1) Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation: The Organization did not have sufficient cash flow to make the required deposits. The management agent has reflected the delinquent reserve payments as a payable at December 31 2024 and is making deposits as cash flow allows. (2) Actions Taken on the Finding: The Organization is making the delinquent depoist as cash flow allows
View Audit 352855 Questioned Costs: $1
Condition: Retainage payable of $47,878 was incorrectly reported in the program expenditures as of September 30, 2024. Corrective Action Plan: See the City’s response starting on page 19.
Condition: Retainage payable of $47,878 was incorrectly reported in the program expenditures as of September 30, 2024. Corrective Action Plan: See the City’s response starting on page 19.
As stated by the auditor, SCEC is selective about who to enter contracts with and has long standing relationships with the organizations we were working with on these efforts, who also had other Federal contracts in process that we were aware of. We have instituted a finance procedure to check all c...
As stated by the auditor, SCEC is selective about who to enter contracts with and has long standing relationships with the organizations we were working with on these efforts, who also had other Federal contracts in process that we were aware of. We have instituted a finance procedure to check all contractors and sub-contractors on the Sam.gov’s verification of debarment and suspension tool before the first payment under the contract is issued and a policy that all SCEC contracts or subawards over $25,000 that utilize federal or state funds must include a suspension and debarment certification.
Management attempted to contract with multiple accounting consultants for creating the SEFA but they were already at full capacity and were not available to assist with the creation of the report. When the relevant contract or grant award did not include the necessary information, SCEC management an...
Management attempted to contract with multiple accounting consultants for creating the SEFA but they were already at full capacity and were not available to assist with the creation of the report. When the relevant contract or grant award did not include the necessary information, SCEC management and program staff reached out to our contracting agencies to confirm whether federal funds were part of each award and to find out CFDA numbers and other contract information necessary to complete the form. Nevertheless, there were several errors that in the SEFA submitted to our auditors for review. For the two IRP and RMAP lending programs, the prior year balances were carried over into the FY 24 SEFA through a clerical error. The errors in item 11.037 and 11.419 are related to information we received from the contracting agency. In particular, 11.037 was listed under US Economic Development Administration according to the contracting agency and we were given the description of Economic Adjustment Assistance. The description for 11.419 was given to SCEC by the contracting agency as CDS – Congressionally Directed Spending. Finally, we provided two CFDA’s for the STEM Education award with the submission of the SEFA as we were waiting for confirmation from Program Managers about the correct CDFA numbers. The auditors were informed that we were waiting for these numbers when the SEFA was submitted. In FY24, SCEC had 29 different federal funding sources, from 14 different agencies. We are working to improve our capacity to report these awards without error before the review of our auditors.
The Utilites Board of the City of Oneonta will not request advance receipt of payment. The Organization will be following Procedure CFR section 200.305 (b)(1). Payments will be processed and issued within 10 business days of received date from engineer. If payments cannot be made within 30 days, ...
The Utilites Board of the City of Oneonta will not request advance receipt of payment. The Organization will be following Procedure CFR section 200.305 (b)(1). Payments will be processed and issued within 10 business days of received date from engineer. If payments cannot be made within 30 days, received funds will be required deposited into a designated insured interest-bearing account until payments have been issued. Anticipated Completion Date: 2/4/2025 Responsible Person: Mark Gargus, General Manager
Finding 554236 (2024-001)
Significant Deficiency 2024
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (Concerning Finding 2024-001) 2024-001 – Wage Rate Requirements Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Wendy Bradstreet, RSU29 Business Manager Corrective Action: RSU29 will take the following actions to address finding 2023-001: The district has been implementing n...
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (Concerning Finding 2024-001) 2024-001 – Wage Rate Requirements Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Wendy Bradstreet, RSU29 Business Manager Corrective Action: RSU29 will take the following actions to address finding 2023-001: The district has been implementing new procedures and processes as of May 15, 2024, to correct the issues in question to comply with CFR(s): 2 CFR Appendix II to Part 200; 29 CFR 5.2; 29 CFR 5.5, to make sure we remain in compliance with OMB guidelines. As originally addressed in the Corrective Action Plan, back wages have been issued to ensure compliance with federal guidelines and language has been incorporated into new construction contracts and documents. Davis Bacon language has been included in current year construction projects paid with federal and/or state funding. Payroll certifications have been received and reviewed with each invoice submitted for payment by the district’s business manager to ensure compliance with wage rate requirements for Davis Bacon guidelines as applicable. A copy of the OMB Circulars containing the CFR guidelines have been received and reviewed by the Business Manager and applicable grant managers/coordinators to implement a more stringent internal control process and procedure to ensure all requirements are followed. The Business Manager has updated the district’s administrative team and central office staff of applicable guidelines to ensure compliance of all projects that is being paid for by federal and/or state funding. Anticipated Completion Date: October 15, 2024
Suspension and Debarment There is no disagreement with the finding. Management immediately began to review policies and procedures.
Suspension and Debarment There is no disagreement with the finding. Management immediately began to review policies and procedures.
Recommendation: During our review of the organization's procurement processes, it was noted that the organization does not have a procurement policy that complies with federal requirements. Specifically, the policy does not address key elements such as competition, cost or price analysis, and docume...
Recommendation: During our review of the organization's procurement processes, it was noted that the organization does not have a procurement policy that complies with federal requirements. Specifically, the policy does not address key elements such as competition, cost or price analysis, and documentation requirements as outlined in federal regulations. We recommend that the Organization develop and implement a procurement policy that complies with federal requirements, including provisions for competition, cost or price analysis, and proper documentation. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Management has reviewed the federal law and standards identified in 2 CFR 200.318 through 2 CFR 200.327. A procurement policy that aligns with these federal requirements is currently being developed. The policy is expected to be adopted and in place in the coming months. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Angela Woods Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 2, 2025
Recommendation: During our review of the grant expenditures, it was noted that budgeted amounts were charged to the grant instead of the actual costs incurred. This practice was observed in multiple instances, leading to discrepancies between the reported expenditures and the actual costs. Managemen...
Recommendation: During our review of the grant expenditures, it was noted that budgeted amounts were charged to the grant instead of the actual costs incurred. This practice was observed in multiple instances, leading to discrepancies between the reported expenditures and the actual costs. Management did not review time and effort to make after-the-fact adjustments to the amounts charged to the grant. We recommend that the Organization establish a review process to ensure that all costs charged to the grant are based on actual expenditures and are properly documented Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Management has established a review process to ensure that all costs charged to the grant are based on actual expenditures and are properly documented. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Theresa Watters Planned completion date for corrective action plan: February 21, 2025
Recommendation: Under 2 CRF 200.406, credits accruing to or received by the recipient of federal funding that relate to allowable costs must be credited to the Federal award as either a cost reduction or cash refund. The Organization did not have adequate internal controls designed to properly deter...
Recommendation: Under 2 CRF 200.406, credits accruing to or received by the recipient of federal funding that relate to allowable costs must be credited to the Federal award as either a cost reduction or cash refund. The Organization did not have adequate internal controls designed to properly determine the appropriate amounts to be submitted for reimbursement. We recommend the Organization review the expenditures submitted to SAMHSA and ensure that there is no "double dipping' of sales taxes. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Management has implemented a review process for all expenditures submitted to SAMHSA. The review process ensures that there is no “double dipping” of sales tax. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Theresa Watters Planned completion date for corrective action plan: February 21, 2025
CFO will review monthly indirect costs charged to each grant program on a monthly basis to ensure compliance with federally assigned, negotiated indirect cost rate, indirect cost rates allowable per each award/ contract, and make sure there are no inconsistencies or overages or conflicts.
CFO will review monthly indirect costs charged to each grant program on a monthly basis to ensure compliance with federally assigned, negotiated indirect cost rate, indirect cost rates allowable per each award/ contract, and make sure there are no inconsistencies or overages or conflicts.
Instruct directors who charge working time to multiple grant funded projects conduct a timestudy periodically for whole days at a time to ensure that their time is being appropriately charged to grants based on time worked, and not based on estimates or old information.
Instruct directors who charge working time to multiple grant funded projects conduct a timestudy periodically for whole days at a time to ensure that their time is being appropriately charged to grants based on time worked, and not based on estimates or old information.
CFO will create an ongoing excel sheet with itemized lines and totals for each ongoing construction project and incorporate all related invoices in the sheet to ensure that there is a project total that ties back to the asset total at fiscal year end.
CFO will create an ongoing excel sheet with itemized lines and totals for each ongoing construction project and incorporate all related invoices in the sheet to ensure that there is a project total that ties back to the asset total at fiscal year end.
Corrective action plan: Management has implemented correction of this finding, after education as to deadlines for submission of the completed audit report. Personnel responsible for corrective action: Timothy Jodway, Interim Chief Financial Officer. Estimated corrective action completion date: Apri...
Corrective action plan: Management has implemented correction of this finding, after education as to deadlines for submission of the completed audit report. Personnel responsible for corrective action: Timothy Jodway, Interim Chief Financial Officer. Estimated corrective action completion date: April 2025
Corrective action plan: Management is in the process of implementing a method for employees to charge their time to grants, as needed, from the payroll system. Personnel responsible for corrective action: Timothy Jodway, Interim Chief Financial Officer. Estimated corrective action completion date: M...
Corrective action plan: Management is in the process of implementing a method for employees to charge their time to grants, as needed, from the payroll system. Personnel responsible for corrective action: Timothy Jodway, Interim Chief Financial Officer. Estimated corrective action completion date: May 2025
View Audit 352776 Questioned Costs: $1
March 26, 2025 Eide Bailly, LLP Supervisor, Local Government & Finance Reno, NV 89706 Dear Mr. Kurt Schlicker, We have received and reviewed the audit report issued by your firm regarding our financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. We appreciate the thoroughness and profess...
March 26, 2025 Eide Bailly, LLP Supervisor, Local Government & Finance Reno, NV 89706 Dear Mr. Kurt Schlicker, We have received and reviewed the audit report issued by your firm regarding our financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. We appreciate the thoroughness and professionalism demonstrated by your audit team throughout the process. We acknowledge the critical importance of establishing and maintaining an effective system of internal control over compliance, particularly in relation to accurate reporting of financial data reporting per Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) section 200.303. As such, we are committed to taking immediate corrective actions to address accurate reporting of the SF-425 reports to the federal agency. We have outlined below the specific steps we have already undertaken and will undertake: 1. Revise & Standardize Reporting Procedures: a. Review the current SF-425 reporting procedures to identify gaps and inconsistencies. b. Revise and standardize the SF-425 reporting workflow to ensure consistency and accuracy in data entry. c. Implement a checklist for all required data fields on the SF-425 form to ensure no information is omitted or inaccurately reported. d. Develop clear guidelines for preparing and submitting the SF-425, detailing the roles and responsibilities of all staff involved. e. Establish a timeline for regular preparation and submission, ensuring reports are submitted on time. 2. Staff Training: a. Develop a targeted training program for staff responsible for preparing and submitting SF-425 reports, covering the details of the form, reporting standards, and compliance requirements outlined in 2 CFR Part 200. b. Conduct training sessions on accurate financial reporting, how to fill out the SF-425 form, and the importance of timely submission. Offer refresher training annually or whenever there are significant changes to the reporting process or the Uniform Guidance. c. Create written documentation, such as a manual or guide, to assist staff in preparing future reports. 3. Strengthen Internal Monitoring and Oversight Mechanisms: a. Create a two-tier review process: first, a departmental review by the grant administrator or compliance officer, followed by an executive-level review by a department head. b. Develop a checklist of specific financial items (e.g., total grant expenditures, unliquidated obligations, remaining balances) to ensure that all necessary data is accurately reflected. c. Ensure that any discrepancies identified during the review process are corrected prior to submission. d. Document all approvals and review steps for transparency and accountability. 4. Establish a Reporting Calendar and System for Timely Submission: a. Create a comprehensive reporting calendar that includes the submission deadlines for all SF-425 reports, as well as internal deadlines for review and approval. b. Implement a reminder system to notify relevant staff members in advance of upcoming deadlines for SF-425 submissions. c. Ensure that all parties involved in the reporting process are aware of their specific deadlines and responsibilities, with ample time allocated for review and approval. d. Monitor submission timelines to ensure that reports are submitted without delay. 5. Responsible Parties and Accountability to be designated: a. Department Head: Responsible for reviewing the SF-425 and provide ongoing oversight of the reporting process. b. Finance Department: Responsible for preparing the SF-425 reports, ensuring that financial data is accurate and complies with federal guidelines. c. Grant Administrator/Compliance Officer: Oversee the development and implementation of the corrective action plan, ensure compliance with federal regulations, and review SF-425 reports for accuracy and completeness. d. Procurement Staff: Ensure all financial activities related to the AFG are properly documented and reported in the SF-425. By implementing these corrective actions, we are committed to addressing the material weakness in compliance, including accurate reporting of SF-425 financial data. These steps will enhance the accuracy, reliability, and transparency of our financial reporting and improve our internal controls over our financial and federal reporting. The District is committed to ensuring the accurate and timely submission of SF-425 reports in accordance with federal regulations and the Uniform Guidance. By implementing this corrective action plan, we will strengthen our internal controls over compliance and reporting, ensuring that all federal financial reports are submitted correctly and within the required timelines. Through the establishment of robust procedures, training, and continuous monitoring, we aim to maintain the integrity and compliance of our financial reporting process for the Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program. We appreciate your insights and recommendations provided during the audit process and welcome any additional guidance or support your firm can offer as we work to address the identified weaknesses. Should you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your continued partnership and support. Sincerely, Jackie Signorelli CFO
« 1 563 564 566 567 2134 »