Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
51,865
In database
Filtered Results
49,058
Matching current filters
Showing Page
215 of 1963
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Finding 1155927 (2024-004)
Material Weakness 2024
1. There was one (1) instance out of five (5) tenant files selected for testing, whereby the tenant file could not be located.
1. There was one (1) instance out of five (5) tenant files selected for testing, whereby the tenant file could not be located.
View Audit 368350 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 1155927 (2024-004)
Material Weakness 2024
2. In four (4) instances out of four (4) tenant files tested, the HUD Form 50059 was not signed until January of 2025. The effective move out dates occurred, during the 2024 calendar year.
2. In four (4) instances out of four (4) tenant files tested, the HUD Form 50059 was not signed until January of 2025. The effective move out dates occurred, during the 2024 calendar year.
View Audit 368350 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 1155927 (2024-004)
Material Weakness 2024
3. In one (1) instance out of four (4) tenant files tested, the move out inspection report was dated February 3, 2025. The effective move date was November 18, 2024.
3. In one (1) instance out of four (4) tenant files tested, the move out inspection report was dated February 3, 2025. The effective move date was November 18, 2024.
View Audit 368350 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 1155927 (2024-004)
Material Weakness 2024
4. In one (1) instance out of four (4) tenant files tested, there was no supporting documentation, indicating that the return of the tenant’s security deposit was issued within 30 days of the effective move out date.
4. In one (1) instance out of four (4) tenant files tested, there was no supporting documentation, indicating that the return of the tenant’s security deposit was issued within 30 days of the effective move out date.
View Audit 368350 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 1155927 (2024-004)
Material Weakness 2024
Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation. Management concurs with the finding and the auditor’s recommendation that Alpha Tower should process applicants and tenants, including recertification of tenants in accordance with guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Developm...
Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation. Management concurs with the finding and the auditor’s recommendation that Alpha Tower should process applicants and tenants, including recertification of tenants in accordance with guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development prior to the tenant occupying the unit. By performing these procedures, the risk of incurring questioned costs will be significantly reduced.
View Audit 368350 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 1155927 (2024-004)
Material Weakness 2024
Actions Taken on the Finding.
Actions Taken on the Finding.
View Audit 368350 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 1155927 (2024-004)
Material Weakness 2024
Corrected going forward and reviewing discrepancies.
Corrected going forward and reviewing discrepancies.
View Audit 368350 Questioned Costs: $1
Waiting List
Waiting List
Condition:
Condition:
A waiting list was not maintained in accordance with the HUD guidelines established in the HUD Handbook 4350.3 REV.
A waiting list was not maintained in accordance with the HUD guidelines established in the HUD Handbook 4350.3 REV.
Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation.
Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation.
Management concurs with the finding and the auditor’s recommendation that a waiting list be maintained in accordance with the guidelines established in the HUD Handbook 4350.3 REV..
Management concurs with the finding and the auditor’s recommendation that a waiting list be maintained in accordance with the guidelines established in the HUD Handbook 4350.3 REV..
Actions Taken on the Finding.
Actions Taken on the Finding.
Correcting going forward.
Correcting going forward.
Tenant Files
Tenant Files
Condition:
Condition:
Recertification:
Recertification:
1. In one (1) instance out of nine (9) tenant files tested, the annual recertification was not performed, within a twelve-month period.
1. In one (1) instance out of nine (9) tenant files tested, the annual recertification was not performed, within a twelve-month period.
2. In seven (7) instances out of nine (9) tenant files tested, the HUD-EIV was not maintained in the tenant’s file to support the tenant’s income for the 2024 annual recertification.
2. In seven (7) instances out of nine (9) tenant files tested, the HUD-EIV was not maintained in the tenant’s file to support the tenant’s income for the 2024 annual recertification.
3. In one (1) instance out of nine (9) tenant files tested, the Applicant’s/Tenant’s Consent to the Release of Information (Form 9887-A) was not dated by the Property Manager.
3. In one (1) instance out of nine (9) tenant files tested, the Applicant’s/Tenant’s Consent to the Release of Information (Form 9887-A) was not dated by the Property Manager.
4. In one (1) instance out of nine (9) tenant files tested, the HUD Form-50059 was not signed by the Tenant and Property Manager, until January 2025. The effective date was October 1, 2024.
4. In one (1) instance out of nine (9) tenant files tested, the HUD Form-50059 was not signed by the Tenant and Property Manager, until January 2025. The effective date was October 1, 2024.
5. In one (1) instance out of nine (9) tenant files tested, the tenant’s income was based on the net social security benefit as opposed the gross social benefits.
5. In one (1) instance out of nine (9) tenant files tested, the tenant’s income was based on the net social security benefit as opposed the gross social benefits.
6. In three (3) instances out of nine (9) tenant files tested, the effective date on the Notification of Rent Increase resulting from Recertification Processing – Section 811 PRAC form, did agree to the effective date on the HUD Form-50059.
6. In three (3) instances out of nine (9) tenant files tested, the effective date on the Notification of Rent Increase resulting from Recertification Processing – Section 811 PRAC form, did agree to the effective date on the HUD Form-50059.
7. In one (1) instance out of nine (9) tenant files tested, the Notification of Rent Increase resulting from Recertification Processing – Section 811 PRAC form was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
7. In one (1) instance out of nine (9) tenant files tested, the Notification of Rent Increase resulting from Recertification Processing – Section 811 PRAC form was not maintained in the tenant’s file.
Move-outs:
Move-outs:
« 1 213 214 216 217 1963 »