Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
48,527
In database
Filtered Results
202
Matching current filters
Showing Page
4 of 9
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: § 200.331
Finding 502962 (2023-005)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Community Services Block Grant, ALN 93.569 Condition/Cause/Context: The County did not follow the documented policy or procedure for evaluating potential subgrantees’ risk of noncompliance prior to award of subgrants for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. The County wa...
Community Services Block Grant, ALN 93.569 Condition/Cause/Context: The County did not follow the documented policy or procedure for evaluating potential subgrantees’ risk of noncompliance prior to award of subgrants for purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring. The County was not aware of their own policy and requirements of Uniform Guidance related to pass-through entities” responsibility to perform and retain written risk assessment as part of subrecipient monitoring. The County does have a policy in place in conformity with Federal Uniform Guidance criteria relating to evaluating the risk of noncompliance prior to awarding subgrants. However, the policy was not followed during the fiscal year under audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Campbell County Board of Commissioners concur with this finding and the related audit recommendation. Campbell County perpetually evaluates, updates, and compiles formal written policies and procedures for grants administration. The grants administration policy is consistent with the requirements of Uniform Guidance, as documented within the previously compiled and adopted County Uniform Guidance implementation package. In response to the criteria and condition of the finding regarding the written risk assessment was performed for the overall program and for the subrecipients. However, the written formal documentation was not retained for three of the four subrecipients through oversight. Formal checklists will be compiled and maintained within each grant file to ensure compliance with Guidance and retention of relevant documentation. The following individuals can be contacted for further information: Commissioner’s Office: Shelly Edwards, Chief Finance Executive, Sandra Beeman, Administrative Director and Kristin Young, Grants Management Specialist
REFERENCE # 2023-001 Rail and Transit Security Grant Program (ALN # 97.075) - Deficiency-Non-Compliance Agency: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Criteria: Subrecipient Monitoring - As stated in Uniform Grant Guidance - §200.331 Requirements for pass-through entities, all pass-through ...
REFERENCE # 2023-001 Rail and Transit Security Grant Program (ALN # 97.075) - Deficiency-Non-Compliance Agency: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Criteria: Subrecipient Monitoring - As stated in Uniform Grant Guidance - §200.331 Requirements for pass-through entities, all pass-through entities must: Ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. When some of this information is not available, the pass-through entity must provide the best information available to describe the Federal award and subaward. Required information includes: • Subrecipient name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity identifier); • Subrecipient’s unique entity identifier; • Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN); • Assistance Listing Number (ALN) Number and Name; the pass-through entity must identify the dollar amount made available under each Federal award and the ALN number at time of disbursement; • Identification of whether the award is Research & Development; and • Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged per §200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs); Condition/Context: Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“MTA”) has subrecipient monitoring procedures in place. MTA has corporate policies and procedures regarding subrecipient contracts. We reviewed Rail and Transit Security Grant Program’s subrecipient monitoring compliance. This program had one subrecipient. Based on our review of the subrecipient contract for this program, we noted that the subrecipient contract did not have all the required elements as stated in §200.331. Recommendation: We recommend that MTA implement policies and procedures to communicate the federal grant information to all subrecipients in accordance with Uniform Grant Guidance CFR 200.331 Subrecipient Requirements. Corrective Action Plan The MTA Office of Security has updated it Sub-recipient contract to include the ALN Number – 97.075, Identification of whether the award is R&D and Indirect cost rate for the Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged) per § 200.414 as per the checklist. Action date March 31, 2025 Final Implementation Date March 31, 2025 Name And Phone Number Of Person Responsible For Implementation Daemion De Vonish Work Ph# 212-878-4768
Condition: The Organization did not clearly communicate the required federal award information and applicable requirements to the subrecipients. The Organization did not evaluate the risk of non-compliance of the subrecipients in order to identify the appropriate monitoring procedures. Statistical s...
Condition: The Organization did not clearly communicate the required federal award information and applicable requirements to the subrecipients. The Organization did not evaluate the risk of non-compliance of the subrecipients in order to identify the appropriate monitoring procedures. Statistical sampling was not used in making sample selections. Response: The Organizations’ Board and Chief Executive OGicer (CEO) and key HCEDC StaG recognize the need to further refine subrecipient monitoring. Subrecipients within the identified project are all school districts already under single audit with associated levels of financial controls and reporting. Participating districts, via their appropriate elected boards, were informed the conditions of the grant and individually voted to accept obligations and requirements. Some subrecipients in Fall 2023 did attempt to submit unauthorized expenses, the controls were adequate for management to identify these discrepancies, which were in turn not submitted for reimbursement to the state, and appropriate amendments were made prior to any expense being reimbursed. HCEDC management, in alignment with outsourced controller services via CliftonLarsonAllen LLP, have now further increased controls and monitoring activity. Through the onboarding of a new Grants Management System (GMS) in Fall 2024, subrecipient monitoring activity and profiles are now created for each eligible award. In 2024, the HCEDC has also been much more active in communicating reporting and grants management requirements to subrecipients, including multiple amendments to the ESSER grant program. The new GMS system is built specifically to assist organizations with single audit compliance and has multiple features specific to subrecipient reporting and monitoring.
State of Missouri Single Audit Corrective Action Plan Year Ended June 30, 2023 State Agency: Office of Administration Audit Finding Number: 2023-010, SLFRF Program Subrecipient Monitoring Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Stacy Neal Anticipated completion d...
State of Missouri Single Audit Corrective Action Plan Year Ended June 30, 2023 State Agency: Office of Administration Audit Finding Number: 2023-010, SLFRF Program Subrecipient Monitoring Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Stacy Neal Anticipated completion date for corrective action: September 2024 Recommendation A.: Develop policies and procedures to determine whether recipients of SLFRF program funds are subrecipients or contractors. Work with the state agencies to ensure accurate and documented determinations are prepared for all recipients and modify subrecipient records as needed. OA partially agrees with the auditor’s finding. Corrective action planned is as follows: OA believes there are opportunities to improve the classification of subrecipient vs. contractor to ensure compliance with federal regulations. We concur that OA, as the responsible party, should modify a department determination of subrecipient when there is a conflict with the regulation. Finally, we agree that clear communication on roles and responsibilities of OA vs. departments related to compliance is essential and can be improved. Given this position, we disagree that OA needs to issue procedures that restate the rules the uniform guidance and SLFRF regulations already state. We will continue to have discussions with agencies and ensure compliance with federal regulations. Recommendation B.: Develop a subrecipient monitoring program in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, that including performing risk assessments for each subrecipient for the purposes of determining the appropriate subrecipient monitoring procedures; monitoring for compliance with federal requirements and subaward terms and conditions and ensuring subaward performance goals are achieved; and reviewing subrecipient single audit reports. Ensure tasks delegated to state agencies are adequately communicated and establish procedures to ensure those tasks are appropriately completed. OA agrees with the auditor’s finding. Corrective action planned is as follows: OA approached the SLFRF money to consider all spending (whether to subrecipients or any other payment) as high risk due to the large dollar amount of one-time funding that is subject to rules that have changed over time. We have continued to treat this unique and highly publicized funding as high risk for fraud and exercise due diligence to mitigate that risk. OA agrees however, that our universal determination related to the SLFRF does not meet the specific uniform guidance rules. OA agrees to provide additional communications to departments to ensure agencies understand their responsibilities for sub-recipient monitoring including sub-recipient specific risk assessments and monitoring. Finally, OA will implement random reviews of the sub-recipient monitoring compliance.
Action Taken: 1.) Subrecipient funding agreements have been updated to include the following information: federal award identification information, requirements imposed by pass-through entity, information on the indirect cost rate and requirements to permit access to subrecipients records and statem...
Action Taken: 1.) Subrecipient funding agreements have been updated to include the following information: federal award identification information, requirements imposed by pass-through entity, information on the indirect cost rate and requirements to permit access to subrecipients records and statements. 2.) Agency will verify subaward applicants are not suspended or debarred from receiving federal funding prior to approval of funding application. Agency will maintain documentation of such verification with subaward application materials. 3.) Agency has developed a risk-based fiscal monitoring program for all federal award subrecipients. Detailed monitoring requirements are included in subrecipient funding agreements.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Center has already created a new risk assessment template to determine the level of risk associated with working with subrecipients. The Center will document the risk assessment findings and determine the necessary monitoring levels....
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Center has already created a new risk assessment template to determine the level of risk associated with working with subrecipients. The Center will document the risk assessment findings and determine the necessary monitoring levels. Name and Title of Responsible Official(s): Vibha Bhatia, Vice President of Finance and Operations Anticipated Completion Date: October 31, 2024
Mayor’s Office of Housing (MOH) has implemented control procedures to ensure that each subrecipient is evaluated for risk of noncompliance to ensure appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2024 Responsible Contact Person: Colin Musto, Assistant City Auditor, Gran...
Mayor’s Office of Housing (MOH) has implemented control procedures to ensure that each subrecipient is evaluated for risk of noncompliance to ensure appropriate subrecipient monitoring. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2024 Responsible Contact Person: Colin Musto, Assistant City Auditor, Grants Monitoring Unit colin.musto@boston.gov
Finding 486151 (2023-003)
Material Weakness 2023
Finding 2023-003 Finding Subject: Covid-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Subrecipient Monitoring Summary of Finding: The County did not include all required information in the subrecipient agreements during the audit period. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: D...
Finding 2023-003 Finding Subject: Covid-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Subrecipient Monitoring Summary of Finding: The County did not include all required information in the subrecipient agreements during the audit period. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Debbie Morton-Crum, County Auditor Contact Phone Number: 765-482-2940 Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with the finding. Description of Corrective Action Plan: The County Commissioners are responsible for the American Rescue Plan project list along with that responsibility is to have a sub-recipient agreement in place with those outside entities that received American Rescue Plan grant monies from the County. An Internal Control is now in place that requires a sub-recipient agreement in place before a warrant can be paid to those outside entities. We will put procedures in place to ensure that money disbursed to sub-recipient is monitored. Anticipated Completion Date: December 2024
Finding 485986 (2023-005)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Recommendation: It is recommended the County reviews their policies to ensure reporting requirements are met including a review of the subrecipient reports prior to submission. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response...
Recommendation: It is recommended the County reviews their policies to ensure reporting requirements are met including a review of the subrecipient reports prior to submission. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The County will implement policies to ensure reporting processes include review by someone other than the preparer. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action plan: Kathleen Ryan, Chief Financial Officer. Planned completion date for corrective plan: December 31, 2024
Auditor’s Recommendation: We recommend that management require all sub-awardees to have a subaward agreement or memorandum of understanding (MOU). Action Taken: • As a First Year Single Auditee, the management team will ensure that senior leadership team, finance and accounting team, as well as p...
Auditor’s Recommendation: We recommend that management require all sub-awardees to have a subaward agreement or memorandum of understanding (MOU). Action Taken: • As a First Year Single Auditee, the management team will ensure that senior leadership team, finance and accounting team, as well as program manager/directors for federal awards receive some form of training and certify receipt of this training within six-months of these findings. • As a First Year Single Auditee, the management team will ensure that specific policies for sub-awards and sub-recipients will better ensure its internal practices are in alignment with Uniform Guidance standards for federal awards. • As a First Year Single Auditee, the management team will have an independent audit firm review these specific policies to ensure they are in alignment and conformance with Uniform Guidance standards.
Finding 485119 (2023-004)
Significant Deficiency 2023
2023-004 SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING Recommendations: The Council should review existing subrecipient agreements and amend any contracts that may be missing the required Uniform Guidance language. Management should ensure that future contracts use the template appropriate for the funding source (Federal...
2023-004 SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING Recommendations: The Council should review existing subrecipient agreements and amend any contracts that may be missing the required Uniform Guidance language. Management should ensure that future contracts use the template appropriate for the funding source (Federal, state or non-grant funded). To ensure compliance with the requirements for subrecipient monitoring, the Council should establish processes to (1) review and reports required by the subrecipient contract; (2) document the Council’s follow-up on action taken by the subrecipient on any deficiencies detected through audits, on-site reviews or other means; and (3) issue a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient. Management’s Response: The timing of the federal award received from the EPA and the allocation of funds to certain projects approved in the workplan, resulted in several projects that had been completed and were originally funded through other revenue sources such as state license plate funds. The award time frame positioned these projects to be considered allowable pre-award expenses, however due to the timing of completion and award issuance, the agreements could not be amended to add the required federal subrecipient Uniform Guidance Language. The IRL Council will establish the following controls and implement actions to ensure subrecipient compliance: • Review all projects and activities currently allocated and funded by federal sources to insure the Uniform Guidance Language is in place with their respective agreements. For any agreement still in force, language will be amended immediately. For any agreement completed, the subrecipient shall be notified of the source of funds including the federal award identifier and amount of funding pertaining to that agreement to allow for subrecipient audit compliance. • All future subrecipient agreements funded by federal sources will not be executed until the respective federal award is in place and the Uniform Guidance Language is included. • All future and amended federally funded agreements will include language requesting audit reports and any finding with respect to the expenditure of federal funds. • The IRL Council will issue a written decision for audit findings pertaining to the Federal award provided to the subrecipient. Responsible Party: Daniel Kolodny, Chief Operating Officer Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2024.
Finding 480623 (2023-004)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Abby Doyle, Chief Deputy Auditor Contact Phone Number: (574) 235-9668 ext.7201 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with the audit finding with respect to the monitoring of subrecipients for the American Rescue Plan funding. The County monitored...
Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Abby Doyle, Chief Deputy Auditor Contact Phone Number: (574) 235-9668 ext.7201 Views of Responsible Official: We concur with the audit finding with respect to the monitoring of subrecipients for the American Rescue Plan funding. The County monitored the subrecipient agrees for the 50% matching requirement, and the subrecipient was paid properly. However, we did not obtain quarterly progress reports on the program. Description of Corrective Action Plan: On March 4, 2024, the County contacted each entity that signed a sub-recipient agreement for American Rescue Plan (ARP) funding and asked them to complete and sign the attached Proof of Project Efforts Schedule. The schedule provides the County with a description of the project and uses of ARP funds. In addition, the schedule provides a listing of project expenditures and paid invoices. The completed forms have been received and filed. Completion Date: March 29, 2024
In June 2023, following the completion of the 2022 Single Federal Audit, APS immediately implemented additional policies, procedures, and controls to ensure that all subrecipients submit programmatic and financial reports in a timely manner and that these reports are reviewed by the Principal Invest...
In June 2023, following the completion of the 2022 Single Federal Audit, APS immediately implemented additional policies, procedures, and controls to ensure that all subrecipients submit programmatic and financial reports in a timely manner and that these reports are reviewed by the Principal Investigator/Program Manager and Grant Administrator through a new reporting form. This form logs electronic signatures from both the sub-awardee and APS staff. In addition, APS implemented a procedure to review the single federal audit of each sub-awardee annually. APS will review and monitor award amounts and for the required filings annually to ensure that the award amounts are accurate and updated timely to meet all reporting requirements set forth under the Transparency Act. APS implemented the corrective action plan on June 5, 2023. Management's contact responsible for the implementation of the Corrective Action Plan: Name: Jane Hopkins Gould Position: Chief Financial & Operating Officer Telephone number: 301-209-3276
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT 2023-012 WIOA Cluster, Employment Service Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 17.258, 17.259, 17.278, 17.207, 17.801 Action taken in response to the finding: The corrective action plan (CAP) for this finding was implemented and completed in Fiscal Y...
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT 2023-012 WIOA Cluster, Employment Service Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 17.258, 17.259, 17.278, 17.207, 17.801 Action taken in response to the finding: The corrective action plan (CAP) for this finding was implemented and completed in Fiscal Year 2023 with the addition of the FAIN numbers to the subawards and the completion of FY23 CommCorp monitoring. MDCS continues to include FAIN as part of the revised documented process and monitoring is current and timely performed. MDCS therefore considers this item to be completed and closed. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Michael Williams, Director of Field management and Oversight Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2022
2023-003 – Subrecipient Monitoring Compliance Person responsible for corrective action – Andrea Olson, Executive Director Responsible official’s response – Management is in agreement with this finding. Corrective action planned – CAPND has subsequently requested all audit reports from all subrecipie...
2023-003 – Subrecipient Monitoring Compliance Person responsible for corrective action – Andrea Olson, Executive Director Responsible official’s response – Management is in agreement with this finding. Corrective action planned – CAPND has subsequently requested all audit reports from all subrecipients. Additionally, CAPND has changed subaward formatting to ensure that all required information is included within the award. Planned implementation date of corrective action – July 10, 2024
Views of Responsible Officials: The Organizations concur with the auditor's assessment and are in the process of implementing a pre-award risk assessment procedure.
Views of Responsible Officials: The Organizations concur with the auditor's assessment and are in the process of implementing a pre-award risk assessment procedure.
Finding 406231 (2023-013)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Research and Development – Assistance Listing No. 10.216 Research and Development – Assistance Listing No. 43.008 Research and Development – Assistance Listing No. 93.433 Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procedures for the subrecipient monitoring process to ensure the reviews a...
Research and Development – Assistance Listing No. 10.216 Research and Development – Assistance Listing No. 43.008 Research and Development – Assistance Listing No. 93.433 Recommendation: We recommend the University review its procedures for the subrecipient monitoring process to ensure the reviews are completed timely and implement procedures necessary to ensure information is included in the subrecipient award documents at the time of funding. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Langston is strengthening processes to use and distribute disclosures to subrecipients and follow-up for incomplete/unsigned documents from subrecipients. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Mr. Robert Dixon, Director, Grants and Contracts Fiscal Administration at Oklahoma State University. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: March 2024
The County Grants Manager will ensure that all subrecipients receiving $750,000 in Federal Funds undergo a Single Audit as required by 2 CFR Part 200. The Grants Manager will review the SEFA and contact all necessary subrecipients for their audits. Name of Contact Person: Kristi D. Bosch, Grants ...
The County Grants Manager will ensure that all subrecipients receiving $750,000 in Federal Funds undergo a Single Audit as required by 2 CFR Part 200. The Grants Manager will review the SEFA and contact all necessary subrecipients for their audits. Name of Contact Person: Kristi D. Bosch, Grants Manager Anticipated Completion Date: 12/31/2024
The County will review the monitoring plan related to the program and will ensure these procedures are done timely and meet the federal requirements for monitoring subrecipients.
The County will review the monitoring plan related to the program and will ensure these procedures are done timely and meet the federal requirements for monitoring subrecipients.
The County will require departments receiving federal funding to complete a subrecipient and contractor relationship checklist based on the Uniform Guidance prior to entering into a contract with any vendor. This checklist will ensure proper identification of subrecipients and serve as documentation...
The County will require departments receiving federal funding to complete a subrecipient and contractor relationship checklist based on the Uniform Guidance prior to entering into a contract with any vendor. This checklist will ensure proper identification of subrecipients and serve as documentation of this procedure. This checklist will be part of our Grants Acknowledge form implemented by our Grants department that recipient departments are required to complete at a grant’s inception. Completed checklists will be retained and reviewed by the Finance department prior to SEFA compilation to ensure subrecipient expenditures are being properly recorded on the SEFA. For awards identified as being passthroughs to subrecipients, the County has developed additional procedures to document this relationship. This includes a subrecipient package requiring signatures from the County and subrecipient to acknowledge the subrecipient relationship. This package will include relevant award identifiers such as award date, period of performance and Federal awarding agency and Assistance Listing Number and title. Recipient departments will also be required to perform monitoring procedures on identified subrecipients including assessing the subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the subaward. The County has developed a questionnaire for biannual monitoring meetings with the subrecipient that is intended to further document the subrecipient is utilizing funds for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward, and that subaward performance goals are achieved. This questionnaire also requests obtaining copies of the subrecipients financial statements and single audit to verify the subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F - Audit Requirement under the Uniform Guidance
SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING – COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS Recommendation: It is recommended that the County reviews their policies to ensure they are monitoring subrecipients and retaining documentation as required by federal guidelines. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no...
SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING – COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS Recommendation: It is recommended that the County reviews their policies to ensure they are monitoring subrecipients and retaining documentation as required by federal guidelines. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The County will implement policies to ensure all documentation is kept and subrecipient monitoring is in place. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action plan: Nancy Malecha, Finance Director Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2024
REPORTING – COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS Recommendation: It is recommended that the County reviews their policies to ensure reporting requirements are met including a review of the subrecipient reports prior to submission. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreeme...
REPORTING – COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS Recommendation: It is recommended that the County reviews their policies to ensure reporting requirements are met including a review of the subrecipient reports prior to submission. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The County will implement policies to ensure reporting processes include review by someone other than the preparer. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action plan: Nancy Malecha, Finance Director Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2024
The Department of Behavioral Health (DBH) agrees with the findings. Eligibility of Subrecipients: Training will take place for Fiscal Services Staff to ensure that screening for eligibility for the program takes place. The requirement for screening will be added as a required data element so screen...
The Department of Behavioral Health (DBH) agrees with the findings. Eligibility of Subrecipients: Training will take place for Fiscal Services Staff to ensure that screening for eligibility for the program takes place. The requirement for screening will be added as a required data element so screening can be monitored in the grants management system. Earmarking Requirements for Subrecipients: ICR will be set up based on allowable costs from the NOA in grants management system. Training will be conducted for Fiscal and Program Monitors so that they are aware of how ICR is determined and calculated. Monitoring of Subrecipients: DBH will conduct training to ensure that Fiscal and Program Monitors understand the requirements of on-going documentation to identify risk and compliance to the program. DBH will have the monitoring form created in the new grants management system so that failure to complete the documentation will trigger a system alert with an escalation process to ensure compliance. Contact - Eligibility of Subrecipients: Anthony Baffour, Director, Fiscal Services, Earmarking Requirements for Subrecipients: Sharon Hunt, State Opioid Treatment Authority and Anthony Baffour, Director, Fiscal Services, Monitoring of Subrecipients: Sharon Hunt, State Opioid Treatment Authority and Anthony Baffour, Director, Fiscal Services See Corrective Action Plan for chart/table Estimated Completion Date - Staffing Training: August 1, 2024, Grants Management System: January 1, 2025 See Corrective Action Plan for chart/table
The Department of Energy and Environment (DOEE), Office of Neighborhood Safety and Engagement (ONSE) and various other District agencies agree with the conditions and recommendations of this finding. DOEE: The agency will add a section regarding a subrecipient’s prior year audit report to the risk ...
The Department of Energy and Environment (DOEE), Office of Neighborhood Safety and Engagement (ONSE) and various other District agencies agree with the conditions and recommendations of this finding. DOEE: The agency will add a section regarding a subrecipient’s prior year audit report to the risk analysis conducted by program staff. For any prior year audit findings, the agency will request a copy of the subrecipient’s corrective action plan. ONSE: The agency will conduct and review, on a monthly and quarterly basis, site visits/reports and will follow up with subrecipients to submit reports on a timely basis. Various Other District Agencies: The agencies will review the details of subrecipients amount generated from the system and perform a vendor or subrecipient analysis to ensure accuracy of amounts to be reported in SEFA. Contact - Lisa Mae Crawford, Associate Director, Residential Services Division, DOEE, Yasha Williams, Chief Operating Officer, ONSE, Various District Cluster Controllers Estimated Completion Date - September 30, 2024; March 1, 2025 See Corrective Action Plan for chart/table
Views of Responsible Officials: While the Organization did evaluate sub-recipients prior to each sub-award, documentation of that evaluation was not retained as required. For any new subrecipients, the Organization will perform the required pre-award risk assessment and retain adequate documentation...
Views of Responsible Officials: While the Organization did evaluate sub-recipients prior to each sub-award, documentation of that evaluation was not retained as required. For any new subrecipients, the Organization will perform the required pre-award risk assessment and retain adequate documentation of the work performed and results.
« 1 2 3 5 6 9 »