Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
61,436
In database
Filtered Results
23,815
Matching current filters
Showing Page
39 of 953
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: Questioned Costs
Finding: 2025-082 - The University did not pay student’s Title IV credit balance within 14 days. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 84.063, 84.268, 84.007, 84.033 Assistance Listing Title: SFAC Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the find...
Finding: 2025-082 - The University did not pay student’s Title IV credit balance within 14 days. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 84.063, 84.268, 84.007, 84.033 Assistance Listing Title: SFAC Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): UAF has implemented automated refunds since Spring 2025 to ensure the refunds are returned to the students promptly. Additionally, a weekly monitoring report has been established and is reviewed regularly to identify and resolve any issues in a timely manner. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): Completed Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Jennie Witter, UAF Bursar, 907-474-6196
Finding: 2025-081 - During inquiries with management the University of Alaska identified multiple students during enrollment verification process that they determined were fictious. Questioned Costs: AL 84.007: 4,947, AL 84.063: 27,059, AL 84.268: 158,554 Assistance Listing Number: 84.063 84.268 84....
Finding: 2025-081 - During inquiries with management the University of Alaska identified multiple students during enrollment verification process that they determined were fictious. Questioned Costs: AL 84.007: 4,947, AL 84.063: 27,059, AL 84.268: 158,554 Assistance Listing Number: 84.063 84.268 84.007, 84.033 Assistance Listing Title: Student Financial Assistance Cluster (SFAC) Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The university has been actively implementing process improvements across all campuses (UAF, UAA and UAS) to strengthen controls and prevent similar occurrences. Enhancements to the existing processes include the deployment of multilayered interim screening measures to mitigate fraudulent accounts and strengthen internal controls. In addition, the University has acquired a long-term software solution which is currently in the final phase of implementation, to further enhance identity verification procedures and strengthen cybersecurity capabilities. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): May 31, 2026 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Amanda Wall, AVC, UAF Financial Services, 907-474-7552
Finding: 2025-080 - The University did not have documentation of the Federal Funding - Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reports submitted in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 10.237 Assistance Listing Title: From Learning to Leading: Cultivating the Next G...
Finding: 2025-080 - The University did not have documentation of the Federal Funding - Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reports submitted in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 10.237 Assistance Listing Title: From Learning to Leading: Cultivating the Next Generation of Diverse Food and Agriculture Professionals Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): FFATA reporting is currently managed by UAF Office of Grants & Contracts Administration (OGCA). OGCA has developed procedures in place to ensure that all FFATA reports are submitted as soon as the awards are fully executed. In addition, OGCA will create a new report on SAM.gov for subaward amendments to provide clear and complete reporting documentation. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): Completed Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Brent Davis, UAF OGCA Grants and Contracts Officer, 907-474-1851
Finding: 2025-056 - Sixty Medicaid and sixty CHIP recipients were randomly selected for eligibility testing. Testing revealed the following errors: Medicaid five of 60 cases lacked eligibility determination issues (note, some case had multiple deficiencies): • One of sixty case files lacked the prop...
Finding: 2025-056 - Sixty Medicaid and sixty CHIP recipients were randomly selected for eligibility testing. Testing revealed the following errors: Medicaid five of 60 cases lacked eligibility determination issues (note, some case had multiple deficiencies): • One of sixty case files lacked the proper case notes to properly maintain how the individual was determined eligible for payments. • One of sixty cases had an incorrect social security number entered into the ARIES system. In addition: • Five of sixty files lacked documentation of facts supporting the eligibility determination. • One of sixty participants did not meet income eligibility requirements. • Two of sixty cases lacked documentation to verify that the Income and Eligibility Verification System (IEVS) was used to verify income eligibility. CHIP 17 of 60 cases lacked eligibility: determination issues, (note, some case had multiple deficiencies). • One of sixty case files was missing a: CHIP-specific application that was signed of by the program recipient. • Three of the sixty identified cases had identified income that exceeded income limits or income was unable to be verified. • Four of sixty cases lacked documentation to verify that the Income and Eligibility Verification System was used, to verify income eligibi1ity. • Three of sixty cases were not properly closed after the period of eligibility to receive benefits had ended. • Four of sixty cases that had payments to programs participants that were deemed unallowable costs activities due to-multiple individual compliance issues. • Sixteen of sixty cases lacked adequate support for eligibility determinations/redeterminations. Questioned Costs: AL 93.778: 138 (known questioned costs); 37,006,989 (likely questioned costs), AL 93.767: 288 (known questioned costs); 582,269 (likely questioned costs) Assistance Listing Number: 93.767, 93.775, 93.777, 93.778 Assistance Listing Title: CHIP Medicaid Cluster Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with the finding but does not concur with the questioned costs. CMS has notified the state that financial recoveries based on eligibility errors can only be pursued when identified by programs operating under CMS’ Payment Error Rate Measurement (PERM) program, under section 1903(u) of the Social Security Act and regulations at 42 CFR Part 431, Subpart Q. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The Division of Public Assistance will continue to perform case reviews and will randomly sample eligibility determinations to identify error trends and improve training opportunities. Case reviews that specifically target income and case documentation will be performed. The division will broadly message case documentation expectations as well as review in individual office meetings. The division will analyze its case documentation protocols and update them as necessary to ensure all relevant documentation supporting eligibility decisions are present in electronic case files. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): The department anticipates the finding will be resolved in FY2027. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Pam Halloran, Assistant Commissioner
Finding: 2025-055 - Sixty Medicaid and sixty Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) recipients were randomly selected for eligibility testing. Testing revealed the following errors: Medicaid 14 of 60 cases had timing issues (note, some cases had multiple deficiencies): • Seven of the sixty cases...
Finding: 2025-055 - Sixty Medicaid and sixty Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) recipients were randomly selected for eligibility testing. Testing revealed the following errors: Medicaid 14 of 60 cases had timing issues (note, some cases had multiple deficiencies): • Seven of the sixty cases had not gone through a renewal assessment within 12 months of the last determination. • Eleven of the sixty cases’ eligibility determinations were not done timely (i.e., within 45 days). CHIP 26 of 60 cases had timing issues (note, some cases had multiple deficiencies): • Fifteen of sixty cases’ eligibility determinations were not done timely (i.e., within 45 days). • Eighteen of sixty cases had not gone through a renewal assessment within 12 months of the last determination. Questioned Costs: AL 93.778: 2,653 (known questioned costs); 712,969,620 (likely questioned costs), AL 93.767: 2,825 (known questioned costs); 5,719,575 (likely questioned costs) Assistance Listing Number: 93.767, 93.775, 93.777, 93.778 Assistance Listing Title: CHIP Medicaid Cluster Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with the finding but does not concur with the questioned costs. CMS has notified the state that financial recoveries based on eligibility errors can only be pursued when identified by programs operating under CMS’ Payment Error Rate Measurement (PERM) program, under section 1903(u) of the Social Security Act and regulations at 42 CFR Part 431, Subpart Q. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The Division of Public Assistance continues engaging with contractors to incorporate system upgrades to improve timeliness and accuracy with Medicaid determinations. The division will provide additional eligibility resources to ensure timely review of Medicaid cases. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): The department anticipates the finding will be resolved in FY2027. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Pam Halloran, Assistant Commissioner
Finding: 2025-054 - Per the 2025 Office of Management and Budget Compliance Supplement, if the state agency determines that an individual is not cooperating in regards to establishing paternity or related to a support order, “the TANF agency must (1) deduct an amount equal to not less than 25 percen...
Finding: 2025-054 - Per the 2025 Office of Management and Budget Compliance Supplement, if the state agency determines that an individual is not cooperating in regards to establishing paternity or related to a support order, “the TANF agency must (1) deduct an amount equal to not less than 25 percent from the TANF assistance that would otherwise be provided to the family of the individual, and (2) may deny the family any TANF assistance.” Questioned Costs: 4,650 (known questioned costs) Assistance Listing Number: 93.558 Assistance Listing Title: TANF Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with the finding. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The Division of Public Assistance will present refresher training for child support cooperation protocols. The division will continue performing case reviews and randomly sample determinations to support staff eligibility determinations and to identify error trends and training opportunities. Case reviews that specifically target case documentation will be performed. The division will broadly message case documentation expectations as well as review those expectations in individual office meetings. The division will analyze its case documentation protocols and update them as necessary to ensure all relevant documentation supporting eligibility decisions are present in electronic case files. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): The department anticipates the finding will be resolved in FY2026. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Pam Halloran, Assistant Commissioner
Finding: 2025-052 - Sixteen of the sixty cases tested had insufficient documentation to verify work hours which resulted in these work activities being reported inaccurately in the ACF- 199 report. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 93.558 Assistance Listing Title: TANF Views of Respo...
Finding: 2025-052 - Sixteen of the sixty cases tested had insufficient documentation to verify work hours which resulted in these work activities being reported inaccurately in the ACF- 199 report. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 93.558 Assistance Listing Title: TANF Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with the finding. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The Division of Public Assistance will continue to perform case reviews and meet with applicable staff to go over results and offer training and coaching as needed. The division will incorporate targeted reviews that focus on work hour verification and documentation. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): The department anticipates the finding will be resolved in FY2027. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Pam Halloran, Assistant Commissioner
Finding: 2025-051 - Five of sixty Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) recipient case files - tested lacked adequate documentation to indicate that the participant met all eligibility criteria. The following errors were noted: • One case had the monthly benefit the individual calculated in...
Finding: 2025-051 - Five of sixty Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) recipient case files - tested lacked adequate documentation to indicate that the participant met all eligibility criteria. The following errors were noted: • One case had the monthly benefit the individual calculated incorrectly causing an underpayment to the individual. • One case lacked documentation to verify if an 18 year old was attending high school and expected graduation date. • Three cases did not contain a child support cooperation form that assigns to the State the rights the family member may have for support from any other person. Questioned Costs: 3,702 (known questioned costs); 759,673 (likely questioned costs) Assistance Listing Number: 93.558 Assistance Listing Title: TANF Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with the finding. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The Division of Public Assistance will continue to perform case reviews and will randomly sample eligibility determinations to identify error trends and improve training opportunities. The division will present refresher training for child support cooperation protocols. Case reviews that specifically target income and case documentation will be performed. The division will broadly message case documentation expectations as well as review those expectations in individual office meetings. The division will analyze its case documentation protocols and update them as necessary to ensure all relevant documentation supporting eligibility decisions are present in electronic case files. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): The department anticipates the finding will be resolved in FY2027. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Pam Halloran, Assistant Commissioner
Finding: 2025-013 - In FY 25, AKSASP did not consistently conduct required utilization reviews for donated property to ensure the property was being used in compliance with the terms and conditions of the donation. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 39.003 Assistance Listing Title: Do...
Finding: 2025-013 - In FY 25, AKSASP did not consistently conduct required utilization reviews for donated property to ensure the property was being used in compliance with the terms and conditions of the donation. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 39.003 Assistance Listing Title: Donation of Federal Surplus Personal Property Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): SSOA/OPPM, State Property Office agrees with this finding Corrective Action (corrective action planned): As a part of the new monthly review process mentioned above (finding 2025-010), all completed compliance reviews will be reviewed for accuracy and compliance with federal requirements by the State Property Manager and the results compared to reports produced by AssetWorks, the state’s federal property system of record. In addition, The State Property Office will also conduct internal staff training on internal controls prior to the end of the calendar year. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): The new utilization compliance review process has been implemented as of September 30, 2025, internal staff training was completed in December 2025. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): I Jonathon Harshfield State of Alaska Property Manager
Finding: 2025-012 - AKSASP staff did not conduct an annual inventory of federal surplus personal property. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 39.003 Assistance Listing Title: Donation of Federal Surplus Personal Property Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees...
Finding: 2025-012 - AKSASP staff did not conduct an annual inventory of federal surplus personal property. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 39.003 Assistance Listing Title: Donation of Federal Surplus Personal Property Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): SSOA/OPPM, State Property Office agrees with this finding Corrective Action (corrective action planned): To ensure the annual inventory of federal surplus property is completed timely, the State Property Office will shut down operations from 1 September to 15 September annually to conduct a full inventory as rolling inventories do not meet the requirements. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): The state property office will close from September 1, 2026, to September 15, 2026, to complete the required federal inventory by the required due date of September 30, 2026. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Jonathon Harshfield State of Alaska Property Manager
Single Audit Finding No. 2025-066 - Contractor certified payrolls for four of 11 construction projects tested were not submitted during FY25. Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees w...
Single Audit Finding No. 2025-066 - Contractor certified payrolls for four of 11 construction projects tested were not submitted during FY25. Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with this finding and recommendation. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The department will implement measures to follow up with contractors and document attempts to contact businesses. Management will provide additional staff training regarding processes and procedures to ensure that the department is following up with due diligence. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): December 31, 2026 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Michael White, Financial Services Manager
Finding: 2025-041 - One of six Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Pacific Salmon Treaty (PCSRT) Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reports tested was not submitted timely. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 11.438 Assistance Listing Title: PCSRT Views of Responsibl...
Finding: 2025-041 - One of six Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Pacific Salmon Treaty (PCSRT) Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reports tested was not submitted timely. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 11.438 Assistance Listing Title: PCSRT Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): Alaska Department of Fish & Game (ADFG) disagrees with this finding. The FFATA report for the FY2025 NOAA subaward was submitted one month late due to resource constraints while our team was actively implementing a corrective action plan (CAP) for a prior Office of Inspector General (OIG) federal audit finding related to FFATA reporting timeliness. During this period, we prioritized fulfilling the CAP requirements, which included a comprehensive reconciliation of all subawards across federal programs to ensure accuracy and compliance. This intensive remediation effort temporarily impacted our ability to meet standard reporting timelines. The delay was not the result of a new or separate control failure, but rather a timing issue directly tied to the corrective work already underway. Importantly: • The NOAA FFATA report was completed accurately as part of the same remediation workflow. • The delay occurred while addressing the previously identified issue and was resolved within the corrective action period established with the 01G. • The root cause was the same issue identified in the existing finding, and not a new or systemic breakdown. • Updated internal controls and revised procedures were implemented during this period and now apply uniformly across all programs, including NOAA. • These corrective actions have resulted in timely, comprehensive, and fully implemented processes designed to prevent recurrence. Given that the late NOAA FFATA report occurred within the active corrective action window and was resolved through the same documented process, we view this as part of the previously identified issue rather than a separate instance of noncompliance. The corrective actions were completed as planned and have strengthened our reporting controls to ensure ongoing compliance. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): ADFG has implemented formal policies and procedures to ensure timely processing and submission of FFATA reports, fully addressing the previous OIG audit finding. These procedures are now in place and actively followed, and ongoing monitoring has been established to verify continued compliance and prevent recurrence. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): Completed April 15, 2025 Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Jessica Hood, Accountant 5
Finding: 2025-076 - The Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority’s (AIDEA) controls were not designed to detect noncompliance in program income reported in AIDEA’s annual report. During our testing of reports, we noted that the annual report tested did not report interest earned on deposit...
Finding: 2025-076 - The Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority’s (AIDEA) controls were not designed to detect noncompliance in program income reported in AIDEA’s annual report. During our testing of reports, we noted that the annual report tested did not report interest earned on deposit accounts. The amount of interest income not included on the annual report totaled 167,023, which represents the cumulative interest income earned for the program from deposits since inception Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 11.307 Assistance Listing Title: Economic Development Cluster COVID- 19 Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): Agree Corrective Action (corrective action planned): DCCED manages this program on behalf of AIDEA. DCCED will incorporate a new internal control procedure requiring that each year’s final EDA-209 report be reviewed and approved by AIDEA’s Controller or Chief Financial Officer prior to submission and includes backup that supports each number. This review step will ensure the completeness and accuracy of all future filings. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): 06/30/2026 (or the date of when the next EAD-209 report is due) Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): jkornmuller@aidea.orq, aleavitt@aidea.orq, andy.macaulay@alaska.qov
Finding: 2025-050 - Daily SNAP EBT reconciliations were not performed in FY 25. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 10.551, 10.561 Assistance Listing Title: SNAP Cluster Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, bri...
Finding: 2025-050 - Daily SNAP EBT reconciliations were not performed in FY 25. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 10.551, 10.561 Assistance Listing Title: SNAP Cluster Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with the finding. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The Division of Public Assistance implemented a daily reconciliation and monitoring process and trained staff on the revised procedures. The division plans to be fully compliant and current in FY 2026. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): The department anticipates the finding will be resolved in FY2026. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Pam Halloran, Assistant Commissioner
Finding: 2025-049 - DOH’s information technology staff did not properly limit user access to EIS during FY25. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 10.551, 10.561 Assistance Listing Title: SNAP Cluster Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the...
Finding: 2025-049 - DOH’s information technology staff did not properly limit user access to EIS during FY25. Questioned Costs: None Assistance Listing Number: 10.551, 10.561 Assistance Listing Title: SNAP Cluster Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with the finding. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The Division of Public Assistance will revise and strengthen the EIS account reconciliation process to include a change in cadence and update protocols for sponsored accounts. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): The department anticipates the finding will be resolved in FY2026. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Pam Halloran, Assistant Commissioner
Finding: 2025-048 - Testing of 72 FY 25 SNAP EBT issuances found two automated EIS benefit calculations that did not consider an increase in unearned income related to Alaska’s Senior Benefits Program. Questioned Costs: AL 10.551: 660 Assistance Listing Number: 10.551, 10.561 Assistance Listing Titl...
Finding: 2025-048 - Testing of 72 FY 25 SNAP EBT issuances found two automated EIS benefit calculations that did not consider an increase in unearned income related to Alaska’s Senior Benefits Program. Questioned Costs: AL 10.551: 660 Assistance Listing Number: 10.551, 10.561 Assistance Listing Title: SNAP Cluster Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with the finding. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): The Senior Benefits Program encountered a one-time mass change that did not result in an update on all affected cases. The Division of Public Assistance will correct the affected claims and refund associated Questioned Costs: The division will also review mass change protocols with leadership to ensure proper implementation to mitigate recurrence of resulting errors. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): The department anticipates the finding will be resolved in FY2026. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Pam Halloran, Assistant Commissioner
Finding: 2025-047 - The amount of FY 25 SNAP benefits reported to United States Department of Agriculture as issued by the State’s Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) contractor, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS), was 1,235,577 more than the amount of authorized benefits reported in data f...
Finding: 2025-047 - The amount of FY 25 SNAP benefits reported to United States Department of Agriculture as issued by the State’s Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) contractor, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS), was 1,235,577 more than the amount of authorized benefits reported in data from the Division of Public Assistance’s Eligibility Information System (EIS). Furthermore, FIS could not provide a reliable audit trail of issuances. Questioned Costs: AL 10.551: 1,235,577 Assistance Listing Number: 10.551, 10.561 Assistance Listing Title: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Cluster Views of Responsible Officials (state whether your agency agrees or disagrees with the finding; if you disagree, briefly explain why): The department agrees with the finding but does not concur with the questioned costs. The Division of Public Assistance completes reconciliations between FIS daily transaction records and EBT Account Management Agent (AMA) data to ensure issuance accuracy. Corrective Action (corrective action planned): A workgroup identified the root causes of the discrepancies. A revised reporting process is being implemented to ensure all EBT payments are accurately captured, improving completeness and accuracy Daily reconciliations are now in place to support ongoing accuracy and reduce reliance on ad hoc reporting. As a result, the report previously developed for this audit by the EBT contractor, FIS, is not expected to be needed moving forward. Completion Date (list anticipated completion date): The department anticipates the finding will be resolved in FY2026. Agency Contact (name of person responsible for corrective action): Pam Halloran, Assistant Commissioner
Medicaid Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 93.778 Recommendation: The District should design and implement controls to ensure amounts reported are supported by expenditure of the District for eligible activities and positions. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement w...
Medicaid Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 93.778 Recommendation: The District should design and implement controls to ensure amounts reported are supported by expenditure of the District for eligible activities and positions. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The District will develop and implement internal controls to review personnel position indicators included in the quarterly Medicaid Cost Reporting against HR records to validate the position indicators are accurate as of the time of the submission and make corrections, as appropriate. This will ensure that all position-related expenditures included within the Medicaid Cost Reporting are eligible and supported when submitting claims to PCG. Further, the District will ensure that all appropriate supporting documentation, calculations, and workbooks that were utilized to prepare the claim are appropriately reviewed by management, agreed to supporting documentation, and appropriately retained as part of the internal controls. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Accounting Director (Deputy CFO), Financial Reporting Manager, Director of Human Resources Data & Strategy Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 6/30/2026
Medicaid Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 93.778 Recommendation: The District should design and implement controls to ensure required authorization to bill Medicare (Form M-5) is obtained prior to initial billing. We also recommend the District design and implement controls to ensure a copy of this ...
Medicaid Cluster – Assistance Listing No. 93.778 Recommendation: The District should design and implement controls to ensure required authorization to bill Medicare (Form M-5) is obtained prior to initial billing. We also recommend the District design and implement controls to ensure a copy of this form is retained in accordance with Federal and State requirements and is available for future required reviews. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The District will strengthen internal controls to ensure all required authorizations are obtained and properly maintained prior to billing. MPS will accomplish this through the execution of the following: • Implementing a pre-billing verification process to confirm a completed Form M-5 is on file before any initial Medicaid billing occurs, • Establishing a standardized documentation procedure to ensure all Forms M-5 are securely retained and readily accessible for review, • Creating a centralized tracking system to monitor the status of required authorizations for all eligible students, • Conducting periodic internal reviews to ensure compliance with authorization and documentation requirements, • Providing training to relevant staff on Medicaid billing requirements and record retention expectations. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Budget Director, Accounting Director (Deputy CFO), Financial Reporting Manager Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Implementation of the new process is currently underway and will be remediated in the coming months of FY26 and into FY27.
Special Education Cluster (IDEA programs) – Assistance Listing No. 84.027, 84.170 Recommendation: The District should implement controls that allow for the identification and proper classification of vendor payments to applicable grant period. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is...
Special Education Cluster (IDEA programs) – Assistance Listing No. 84.027, 84.170 Recommendation: The District should implement controls that allow for the identification and proper classification of vendor payments to applicable grant period. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The District will strengthen internal controls to ensure that vendor payments are appropriately aligned with the correct grant reporting period. MPS will implement a standardized review process to validate that vendor invoices and related purchase orders are coded to the correct grant period, establish clear procedures for identifying the period of performance for goods and services, enhance coordination between program and finance staff to validate the timing and allowability of expenditures, conduct periodic monitoring of vendor payments to ensure compliance with grant period requirements, and provide training to relevant staff relating to grant period compliance and expenditure classification. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Senior Director of Specialized Services, Accounting Director (Deputy CFO), Financial Reporting Manager Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 6/30/2026
a. Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation During the year ended December 31, 2024, management did not submit Form HUD-9250, "Fund Authorization" to HUD upon termination of the PRAC. As a result, management did not remit excess residual receipts of $418 as of April 30, 2025, to HUD. b. Actio...
a. Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation During the year ended December 31, 2024, management did not submit Form HUD-9250, "Fund Authorization" to HUD upon termination of the PRAC. As a result, management did not remit excess residual receipts of $418 as of April 30, 2025, to HUD. b. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding The 2025 Manor renewal was submitted to HUD before the excess income was in the account. A 9250 for $584.59 has been submitted to HUD for approval of returning in excess residual receipts.
a. Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation During the year ended December 31, 2025, management withdrew $3,169 from the replacement reserve account without HUD approval. b. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding On 03.04.2026, management corrected this issue by depositing $3,169 into the ...
a. Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation During the year ended December 31, 2025, management withdrew $3,169 from the replacement reserve account without HUD approval. b. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding On 03.04.2026, management corrected this issue by depositing $3,169 into the replacement reserve account. Furthermore, management has implemented a strengthened internal control process requiring a three-level review and approval of all replacement reserve withdrawals. Specifically, the Vice President of Operations, Regional Manager, and Controller must each review and approve the request prior to any transfer of funds to ensure compliance with HUD approved withdrawals.
a.Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation During the year ended December 31, 2025, the project did not make required monthly deposits to the replacement reserve in the amount of $15,431. Victory Oaks is required to make monthly deposits to the reserve of $2,204.Action(s) Taken or Planned on ...
a.Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation During the year ended December 31, 2025, the project did not make required monthly deposits to the replacement reserve in the amount of $15,431. Victory Oaks is required to make monthly deposits to the reserve of $2,204.Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding b.Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding On January 13, 2026, management funded the replacement reserve in full.
A. Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation During the year ended December 31, 2025, the project did not make the required monthly deposits to the replacement reserve in the amount of $10,616. Avondale is required to make monthly deposits to the reserve of $1,924. Effective July 1, 2025, the ...
A. Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation During the year ended December 31, 2025, the project did not make the required monthly deposits to the replacement reserve in the amount of $10,616. Avondale is required to make monthly deposits to the reserve of $1,924. Effective July 1, 2025, the monthly deposits required by HUD increased to $2,090. b. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding All required replacement reserve deposits were brought current as of January 13, 2026. Going forward, management will implement enhanced monitoring procedures to ensure timely monthly funding in accordance with HUD requirements. In the event of cash flow constraints, management will proactively reduce nonessential expenditures or seek an owner contribution to maintain compliance with the regulatory agreement.
Name of auditee: Benjamin Hershey Memorial Convalescent Home HUD auditee identification number: 074-11175 Name of audit firm: Dauby O'Connor & Zaleski, LLC Period covered by the audit: Year ended June 30, 2025 CAP prepared by Name: Jessica Ward Position: Chief Financial Officer Telephone number: 402...
Name of auditee: Benjamin Hershey Memorial Convalescent Home HUD auditee identification number: 074-11175 Name of audit firm: Dauby O'Connor & Zaleski, LLC Period covered by the audit: Year ended June 30, 2025 CAP prepared by Name: Jessica Ward Position: Chief Financial Officer Telephone number: 402-333-7373 Current Findings on the Schedule of Findings, Questioned Costs, and Recommendations Finding 2025-001: Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation: The Corporation did not provide HUD with a completed annual financial report by March 31, 2026, as required by HUD. Pursuant to the terms of the Regulatory Agreement, within ninety (90) days following the end of each fiscal year, the Corporation shall provide a complete annual financial report based upon an examination of the books and records of the Community prepared in accordance with the requirements of HUD and certified by a Certified Public Accountant or other person acceptable to the Commissioner. As a result, the Corporation was not in compliance with the Regulatory Agreement. The annual financial statements should be issued in a timely manner pursuant to the time frame set forth by HUD. Action(s) taken or planned on the finding: The audit report as of and for the year ended June 30, 2025 has been submitted to HUD. No further action is required.
« 1 37 38 40 41 953 »