Finding 558104 (2024-007)

Significant Deficiency Repeat Finding
Requirement
B
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2024
Accepted
2025-04-30
Audit: 354985

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: There was a lack of proper documentation for one cost allocation related to the VOCA grant, leading to non-compliance.
  • Impacted Requirements: The organization failed to meet the cost allocation standards set by 2 CFR 200.405.
  • Recommended Follow-up: Enhance policies and procedures for disbursements to ensure compliance with documentation requirements.

Finding Text

Finding 2024-007 – Allowable Costs (Significant Deficiency and Non-compliance)(Repeat finding) Information on the Federal Program: U.S. Department of Justice, Assistance Listing No.16.575 Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.405 establishes requirements for costs allocated to a grant award. These requirements include that costs must be approximated using a reasonable method. Condition/Context: We selected 50 disbursements for testing. Of those 50, 25 were for payroll and 25 were non-payroll disbursements. Of the 25 non-payroll, there was 1 instance in which the cost allocated was not properly documented or supported by a reasonable method. Cause: Expense allocated to the VOCA grant was not properly supported. Effect: The Organization did not adequately document allocation methods required by allowable cost compliance requirements. Questioned costs: $216 Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its policies and procedures surrounding the disbursement process to ensure the Organization is in compliance with all required documentation and disclosure requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding. See Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report.

Corrective Action Plan

This finding is related to activities on our VOCA grants. This exception was related to a process in place prior to May 2023 for allocating our outside contracted IT services Again, in May 2023 FRLS added an electronic transaction approval process via Teams, that documents approvals for all our AP, AR and other transactions initiated by our accounting staff. These are reviewed and approved by the CFO before being posted into the GL. FRLS failed to update its allocation for this prior allocation method for this legacy vendor. The CFO will undertake a review of this process to ensure that we are in compliance with allowable cost documentation requirements. We will also review and update our documentation of allocations and ensure that each month’s allocation is properly approved. This change will be made within the next 60 days.

Categories

Questioned Costs Allowable Costs / Cost Principles

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 558101 2024-004
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 558102 2024-005
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 558103 2024-006
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 558105 2024-008
    Significant Deficiency
  • 1134543 2024-004
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1134544 2024-005
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1134545 2024-006
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1134546 2024-007
    Significant Deficiency Repeat
  • 1134547 2024-008
    Significant Deficiency

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
09.020 Legal Service Corporation Basic Field Grant $8.06M
16.575 Crime Victim Assistance $761,657
12.599 Congressionally Directed Assistance $350,486
21.008 Low Income Taxpayer Clinics $162,711
21.023 Emergency Rental Assistance Program $128,497