Corrective Action Plans

FA 2022-001 Improve Budgetary Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principle Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education Assistance Listing Number and Title: COVID-19 - 84.425D - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Federal Award Number: S425D200012 (Year: 2020), S425D210012 (Year: 2021) Questioner Costs: $62,747.69 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program revealed instances in which expenditures had not been properly approved by the pass-through entity. Corrective Action Plans: We concur with this finding. The District is developing correction actions to strengthen internal controls, policies, and procedures and ensure adherence through improved monitoring. Estimated Completion Date: Fiscal Year 2024 Contact Person: Dr. Myisha Warren, Executive Director of Federal Programs Telephone: 678-676-1200 Email: Myisha_Warren@dekalbschoolsga.org

To carry out its federal programs, Awaiaulu primarily contracts with Hawaiian language speakers and specialists that are known to Awaiaulu?s Executive Director and Program Administrator. This is a relatively small population of people. Only those with special ability and a known high ethical standard are contracted after discussion between the two. However, Awaiaulu will now document and include its procurement requirements in its existing "Fiscal Management Policies & Procedures Manual". Effective October 1, 2023, that policy will follow federal procurement standards; including verification that proposed vendors and contractors are not federally suspended or disbarred.

The allocation of costs between our two federal programs and other programs are made by the Program Director or after discussion between the Program Director and the Federal Grant Manager; then communicated to the accountant. In addition, our accountant has the program knowledge and ability to question cost allocations. Beginning mid-September, 2023, the basis for allocations will be documented on an invoice or other supporting documents. Effective June 2023, weekly payroll time records allocating hours to projects and programs are prepared by each employee. Those time records are approved by the Program Director or the Treasurer, as appropriate. The allocations are then reviewed by the Federal Grant Manager and entered bi-weekly into the accounting records.

Finding ref number:2022-001 Finding caption:bThe District did not have adequate internal controls for ensuring compliance with allowable activities and costs, procurement, and restricted purpose requirements. Name, address, and telephone of District contact person: Keith Ounsted, Business Manager 325 West Chenault Avenue, Hoquiam, WA 98550, (360) 538-8209 Corrective action the auditee plans to take in response to the finding: The District currently has policies in place regarding procurement. In this instance the policies weren?t followed. The district will review all policies around procurement to ensure they are up to date. The District will engage in a retraining of employees that are allowed to make purchases so that all personnel understand what is required. Anticipated date to complete the corrective action: 7/31/2023

St. Anna H.D.F.C., Inc respectfully submits the following Corrective Action Plan for the year ended September 30, 2022. Name and address of the independent public accounting firm who conducted the related audit: Comer, Nowling And Associates, P.C. 10475 Crosspoint Boulevard, Suite 200 Indianapolis, Indiana 46256 Finding 2022-001 Corrective Action Planned ? Management will ensure the surplus cash calculation is completed in a manner that allows for a timely deposit of any required deposit to the residual receipts account. Contact Person(s) Responsible ? Jennifer McEvoy-Riley, Executive Director Anticipated Completion Date ? June 6, 2022 Auditee Disagreements ? None Finding 2022-002 Corrective Action Planned ? Management will provide information on a timely basis to insure the audited financial statements are filed into the REAC system within 90 days after the fiscal year end. Contact Person(s) Responsible ? Jennifer McEvoy-Riley, Executive Director Anticipated Completion Date ? May 23, 2023 Auditee Disagreements ? None This corrective action plan was prepared by St. Simeon Foundation, the management company, on behalf of St. Anna H.D.F.C., Inc. __________________________ _____________________ Title Date St. Simeon Foundation 9 Hilltop Court, Suite 1 Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 (203) 925-9600

Finding 2022-001 - HUD Financial Management Review, Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program ? CFDA No. 14.871; Grant period ? year ended June 30, 2022 The Authority submitted corrective actions to HUD dated February 23, 2023, which included implementing HUD?s recommended corrective actions. Dr. Nadine M. Jarmon, Executive Director, has assumed the responsibility of placing procedures in place to ensure that the Authority will be in compliance with the HUD regulations and expects this to be resolved by June 30, 2023.

Finding 2022-002: The Organization made an unauthorized distribution of project funds, which is a violation of the Organization?s agreement with HUD. Program: Operating Assistance for Troubled Multifamily Housing Projects - 14.164 Description of Finding: During 2022, the Organization made operating advances of $9,208 for expenses belonging to organizations related by common control. These advances were in excess of amounts available from surplus cash as determined by HUD regulations and represent a control deficiency as the matter was not identified timely. Statement of Concurrence or Non-Concurrence: Management concurs with this finding. Corrective Action: At December 31, 2022, the Organization has surplus cash of $466,053 which will not be expended and covers the unapproved distributions. The Organization will also carefully monitor intercompany transactions on an ongoing basis to ensure that no funds are advanced to other entities. Name of Contact Person: Joseph Durand Projected Completion Date: March 31, 2023

Higher Education Emergency Relief Funding (HEERF) ? Assistance Listing No. 84.425 Recommendation: We recommend the colleges reevaluate their procedures surrounding allowable costs and costs being charged to the grant to ensure all are allowable costs. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Clarkson College has reevaluated their procedures surrounding allowable costs and costs being charged to the grant to ensure all are allowable costs. The employee responsible for this finding is no longer associated with the college.

1 CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Project Legal Name: Evangeline Booth Friendship House Fort Worth, TX (A Project of Evangeline Booth Friendship House Residence, Inc., a Texas Corporation) HUD Project No.: 113-EE041 Audit Firm: CohnReznick LLP Period covered by the audit: 10/1/2021-9/30/2022 Corrective Action Plan prepared by: Name: Sriparna Mitra Position: HUD Specialist, THQ (Legal) Telephone Number: 404-728-6700 A. Current Findings on the Schedule of Findings, Questioned Costs and Recommendations 1. Finding 2022-001 a. Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation Management agrees with the finding and is taking steps to address the issue that caused it. The $6,500 will be repaid to the property. b. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding As of January 10, 2023, the check request for the reimbursement to Evangeline Booth Friendship House has been approved. Reimbursement is anticipated in the near future. B. Status of Corrective Actions on Findings Reported in the Schedule of the Status of Prior Year Findings, Questioned Costs and Recommendations Finding 2021-001 Cleared.

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Project Legal Name: Catherine Booth Garden Apartments San Antonio, TX (? Project of Booth Residence San Antonio, Inc., a Texas Corporation) HUD Project No.: 115-EE072 Audit Firm: CohnReznick LLP Period covered by the audit: 10/1/2021-1/11/2022 (day before sale) Corrective Action Plan prepared by: Name: Sriparna Mitra Position: HUD Specialist, THQ (Legal) Telephone Number: 404-728-6700 A. Current Findings on the Schedule of Findings, Questioned Costs and Recommendations 1. Finding 2022-001 a. Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation The auditee agrees with the finding. Management agrees with the recommendation to ask HUD whether a payment should be sent to HUD or the new owner of the property. b. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding The property was sold subsequent to year end and the reserve was transferred to the buyer. Management has reached out to HUD to ask where the payment should be made, as the auditee no longer has access to the reserve. 1. Finding 2021-001 Unresolved. See finding 2022-002 2. 2021-002 Cleared. 3. 2021-003 Cleared.

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 2021-004 Supporting Effective Education Development ? CFDA No. 84.423a Recommendation: We recommend the Center implement a procurement, suspension, debarment policy. Policy should also include conflict of interest policies in line with Uniform Grant Guidance. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: CCE is adopting a Purchasing and Procurement Guideline. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Mike English Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2023 If the Department of Education has questions regarding this plan, please call Mike English at 617-803-1484.

FINDING 2022-004 ? ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL EMERGENCY RELIEF FUND DAVIS-BACON PREVAILING WAGE REQUIREMENTS Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Lisa Baker, Business Manager Contact Person's Phone Number: 765-664-0624 Views of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Description of Correction Action Plan: When the school district is awarded federal funds that will be used for construction, alteration, or repair projects in excess of $2,000, the superintendent and/or business manager will notify the contractors that the project is being funded by federal funds and the requirements as outlined by the Davis-Bacon Act. In addition, the superintendent and/or the business manager will ensure that the contractors provide weekly payroll report certifications and will review the documents to ensure compliance with the wage rate requirements. Anticipated Completion Date: March 24, 2023

FINDING 2022-002 ? ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL EMERGENCY RELIEF FUND ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED AND ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Lisa Baker, Business Manager Contact Person's Phone Number: 765-664-0624 Views of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Description of Correction Action Plan: The following phrase will be added to payroll time cards and bus trip sheets when ESSER funds will be used to pay wages and payroll-related expenses: "I hereby certify that this is a true and accurate representation of all hours worked on behalf of ESSER-funded Summer Academy (or ESSER-funded After-School Tutoring) and that duties performed were only for Summer Academy (or After-School Tutoring)." Contract addendums will include the phrase "ESSER-funded Summer Academy" as well. Anticipated Completion Date: March 24, 2023

Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund ? Assistance Listing 84.425D & 84.425U Condition: All construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act as supplemented by the Department of Labor regulations. This includes a requirement for the contractor to submit to the non-Federal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). Corrective Action Plan: Management will work with contractors to get provisions included in construction contracts in progress and ensure new contracts have required provisions and obtain certified payrolls. Person Responsible for Corrective Action: David Jones, Business Manager Anticipated Completion Date ? FY2023

Corrective Action Plan McAlister Institute for Treatment & Education, Inc. Ling & Bouman, LLP Corrective Action Plan prepared by Steve Hubbard, Chief Financial Officer, (619) 442-0277 2022-01 ? Payroll Recommendation We recommend Management require additional training to Human Resources staff and supervisors regarding meal, rest and recovery period compliance and update their policies and procedures to ensure compliant breaks. In the event of a meal break premium that occurs as the direct result of patient care, appropriate documentation should be maintained by the organization. Meal Break premiums should be automatically coded as a non-reimbursable expense and any exceptions should be manually transferred to program expenses once appropriate supporting documentation is obtained. Actions Taken or Planned on the Finding We concur with the recommendation, and it was implemented effective March 23, 2022.

Condition: The Health Center?s Period 2 report to HHS included duplicate amounts for utilities expenses. Planned Corrective Action: Management will continue to refine processes to more diligently review expenses to ensure no duplicate expenses are included in the underlying supporting documentation. However, the Health Center included as eligible expenses in the Period 2 submission only those amounts up to the funding received, plus accrued interest. Had the noted questioned costs been identified prior to submission, the Health Center would have included additional amounts in the eligible expenses reported in the PRF reporting portal to demonstrate satisfactory use of the PRF funding received. The Health Center had $418,778 in additional eligible operating expenses which were not included in the Period 1 submission and $1,916,769 in additional eligible capital expenses not included in the Period 2 submission which would have been used to replace the identified questioned costs. Person Responsible: Wade Eschenbrenner, CFO Anticipated Completion Date: Ongoing

SUBRECIPIENT CASH MANAGEMENT Department of Health and Human Resources (DHHR) Assistance Listing Number 93.788 The DHHR Bureau for Behavioral Health concurs with the recommendation to mandate additional documentation to support amounts of drawdowns that appear to exceed a subrecipient's immediate cash needs. Upon identification of the condition that led to this finding, the bureau provided additional guidance to all internal grant staff. The guidance was distributed on October 25, 2022 and requires a documented justification for approval of any invoice that appears to exceed 10% of total grant amount for cash on hand. The bureau also intends to seek out and provide technical assistance and/or training for internal staff and subrecipients to ensure they understand the cash management requirements within 2 CFR 200.305.

ELIGIBILITY Department of Health and Human Resources (DHHR) Assistance Listing Number 93.767 For the one instance ?where the social security number, age, date of birth, and immigration status was not verified in the Data Exchange System,? the DHHR Bureau for Family Assistance has requested the creation of an administrative report to identify cases without a social security number entered in applicable case records. This report will be available by February 28, 2023 and will eventually be generated on a quarterly basis. For the nine instances ?where income was not verified,? the DHHR Bureau for Family Assistance will develop additional training that is targeted at both the verification of income and non-financial factors such as date of birth, age, and social security numbers. The training materials will be available to field staff by March 31, 2023 and will include a mandatory completion date of April 30, 2023.

ALLOWABILITY OF EXPENDITURES Department of Health and Human Resources (DHHR) Assistance Listing Number 93.767 Microdyn OPPS quarterly updates for Pricer and Editor Dynamic Link Libraries (DLLs) are commonly received mid-month of the first month in the quarter after the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services releases quarterly updates. During 2022, releases occurred on January 15, April 16, July 16, and October 19. Although updates to the DLL were completed timely throughout the year, claims sampled for the audit fell into the periods of delay between the first day of the quarter and the updates to the DLL. Procedures are in place to reprocess any affected claims once the quarterly updates have been uploaded into the system. However, there was an interruption in the procedure to reprocess claims after the quarterly updates were uploaded to the claims processing system. Corrective action has already been implemented that includes automatically opting and populating the "reprocess claims" flag in the Request Management System (RQMS) when the Microdyn OPPS updates are entered to work. (The RQMS is the system used to enter and manage work orders for the Medicaid Management Information System.) Claims processing staff at the fiscal agent have also entered calendar reminders to reprocess claims as necessary after the OPPS quarterly updates are processed. All affected claims including claims sampled for the Single Audit were reprocessed and paid from mid-December 2022 through mid-January 2023.

ALLOWABILITY Bluefield State University, Glenville State University, and Mountwest Community and Technical College Assistance Listing Number 84.425E, 84.425F, 84.425J, 84.425M Bluefield State University (BSU) response P425F200727 $19,882?BSU agrees with the finding that these were routine maintenance costs that, which would mitigate the spread of COVID, would have been incurred by the University in any event. BSU has put in place procedures to review all future use of funds to be certain that are specifically related to COVID mitigation. P425J200063?BSU believes the questioned costs in this finding were allowable. At the time BSU made the draw for the costs, BSU based the decision on FAQ #23 and used the definition of minor remodeling. This wall is within a previously completed functioning building, and does not structurally alter the building, therefore, BSU deemed it to be remodeling. Due to the overall cost of the wall in comparison to the market value of the building BSU deemed it to be minor. As stated in 34 CFR ? 77.1, ?[m]inor remodeling means minor alterations in a previously completed building? and also includes the extension of utility lines, such as water and electricity, from points beyond the confines of the space in which the minor remodeling is undertaken but within the confines of the previously completed building.? The response to Question #24 of the FAQ provides some additional guidance and specific examples of permissible ?minor remodeling? that may be paid for with HEERF grant funds. The remodeling in this case was very similar to the examples of permissible minor remodeling provided in the FAQ. Obtaining the hospital building permitted BSU to offer on-campus housing in a portion of the hospital that was converted into student dormitories. Another part of the building remained in use as a hospital. HEERF funds were used to construct a wall between the dormitory area and the part of the building being used as an Emergency Room. As a result, the construction of the wall in question was ?for purposes associated with the coronavirus? and should be viewed as an eligible HEERF expenditure. The related plumbing and electrical work should also be viewed as a permissible expenditure given the reference in the response to FAQ #24 to ?the extension of utility lines, such as water and electricity, from points beyond the confines of the space in which the minor remodeling is undertaken but within the confines of the previously completed building.? As indicated previously, at the time the decision to use HEERF fund for the construction of the wall, prior approval was not required. The project in question can be fairly characterized as a minor alteration in a previously completed building for the purposes of preventing the spread of COVID-19. For all of the reasons discussed above, BSU respectfully maintains that the construction of the wall in question and the related electrical and plumbing work should be viewed as an eligible expenditure. P425E200618: BSU believes awards were made in good faith and according to the regulations, as described below. However, BSU proposes the following corrective action plan to mitigate the issue. BSU used $305,191 of institutional funds to make emergency grants to students that the auditors agree meet the definition in the FAQs. These grants were based solely on the number of credits the students were enrolled in during the term or were to pay for books for students who requested assistance. BSU proposes to reimburse the Institutional funds for those grants from the above amount drawn. That would leave a balance of $1,291,079 in dispute and free up those Institutional funds for upcoming COVID related expenses. Additionally, BSU has HBCU funds that are unspent as of the date of this response. BSU proposes to reimburse the remaining balance of $1,291,079 from the HBCU funds. BSU believes these are valid expenses for HBCU funds. That would return those funds to the Student portion, which would allow BSU to make additional emergency payments to students before the funds expire on June 30, 2023. These questions costs were for grants to students who lived in surrounding counties outside of West Virginia who were given waivers for the tuition above the University?s in-state rate, to student athletes and those with certain levels of academic achievement. In addition to the grants noted above, BSU used the Student Portion of HEERF funds to provide emergency funds to all students, based only on their part-time or full-time status. BSU relied on FAQ #s 11, 12 and 13 in determining that expending the funds was within the proper guidelines. For example, the funds were used for the students? cost of attendance and electronic or written authorization were received to use the funds to satisfy students? account balances. Nearly half of those who received the grants in question were Pell eligible (277 out of 600, or 46%). Similarly, approximately 46.9% of the funds spend on grants in these three categories went to Pell eligible students. Therefore, BSU believes that students with exceptional need were appropriately prioritized in awarding these grants. Out-of-state students faced an added financial burden based on the added cost of out of state tuition. Grants to those students to assist with that cost were not linked to any of the factors identified in the response to FAQ #12 as a basis for determining that an institution failed to prioritize emergency financial grants to students with exceptional need. Grants to out-of-state students were just one avenue of distributing HEERF funds to students, who were free to pursue other avenues of funding. As indicated above, BSU used the Student Portion of HEERF funds to provide emergency funds to all students, based only on part-time or full-time status, which given the high percentage of Pell eligible students attending BSU, reached many students with exceptional need. Due to the high proportion of Pell eligible students who received the grants in question and the high costs faced by the out-of-state students, BSU believes that the grants to out-of-state students did not demonstrate a failure to prioritize students with exceptional need. With respect to students who received grants who participated in athletic programs or demonstrated certain levels of academic performance, BSU notes again the group in question contained a high proportion of Pell eligible students. Funds were available through other means to students other than those participating in athletic programs or demonstrating high levels of academic performance (including but not limited to the out-of-state students discussed above or the emergency funds made available to all students based only on full-time or part-time status that were provided using the Student Portion of HEERF funds). Academic performance or athletic participation were not a prerequisite to receiving any assistance at all, but rather two ways to access assistance. Viewing efforts to provide aid to students as a whole, BSU does not believe that the distribution of HEERF funds demonstrated a failure to prioritize emergency financial aid grants to students with exceptional need. Glenville State University (GSU) response To ensure compliance with all federal reporting guidelines, existing federal time and effort calculation guidelines, along with relevant internal control policies and procedures, will be saved to a shared drive or other location to which the necessary personnel have access. As a best practice, primary consideration will be given for the usage of detailed time sheets or time logs being kept for each GSU employee whose time or effort is partially or wholly allocated to federal grant-related activity. These time sheets/time logs will include the percentage of time spent working on grant-related activities, the percentage of time spent working on non-grant university-related activities, a general description of activities performed for the grant related activity, and the total number of hours worked each week. Time sheets/logs will be reviewed and approved regularly by the grant-funded employee, the employee?s supervisor, and the Grants Compliance Director or designee. In cases for which the time sheet method is not deemed practical to be employed, the Chief Financial Officer or designee will draft a memo that provides a detailed explanation and justification of the method used for calculating time and effort. This memo will be signed by the Chief Financial Officer and the Director of Grants Compliance. On a quarterly basis, the Controller or Chief Financial Officer and Director of Grants Compliance will meet to ensure the relevant documented time and effort matches the corresponding draw down amounts. Mountwest Community and Technical College (MCTC) response Effective February 2022, MCTC enhanced policies and procedures to ensure formal approval and documentation of expenditures for HEERF funds is retained to ensure compliance.

SPECIAL TESTS AND PROVISIONS ? DISBURSEMENTS TO OR ON BEHALF OF STUDENTS Pierpont Community and Technical College (PCTC) Assistance Listing Number 84.007, 84.033, 84.038, 84.063, 84.268, 84.379, 84.408, 93.264, 93.342, 93.364, 93.925 PCTC?s standard procedure for disbursement letters is to have the Information Systems Specialist (ISS) provide letters for review to the Director of Financial Aid before mailing. This was either not done by the ISS or overlooked by the Director. The process has been reviewed and communicated to the current Information Systems Specialist as well as the Assistant Director of Financial Aid. The Assistant Director of Financial Aid is authorized to review letters in the absence of or instead of the Director. This action was implemented January 2023.

SPECIAL TESTS AND PROVISIONS - VERIFICATION Bluefield State University, Fairmont State University, and Pierpont Community and Technical College Assistance Listing Number 84.007, 84.033, 84.038, 84.063, 84.268, 84.379, 84.408, 93.264, 93.342, 93.364, 93.925 Bluefield State University (BSU) response Effective January 2023, after all calculations are made and checklists are completed the files will be reviewed by another counselor for accuracy. This reviewer will sign off on the file and checklist that it has been reviewed and no errors were found or recalculation needed. Both the preparer and the reviewer will sign off and date the checklist. Fairmont State University (FSU) response Controls were put into place in 2020-2021 to address the additional review of the verification process once the initial review was completed. FSU found that through some reporting and timing that the additional review did not occur for all students. FSU will implement a weekly review with a comprehensive review monthly to ensure no students are missed through the additional review process in February 2023. Pierpont Community and Technical College (PCTC) response Staff members have been, and will continue to be, prompted to print, scan and keep all documentation pertaining to verifications. In these two cases, the counselor did not print the Confirmation page that displays upon completing V4 & V5 verifications in Central Processing System (CPS) and did not follow the flow of placing the verification packet in the appropriate location for second review. PCTC has reviewed policies and procedures and made a slight modification. Beginning with the 22/23 aid year, the Financial Aid Administrator (FAA) brings the completed verification packet to the Director of Financial Aid. The Director then determines who will complete the second review. The second review can be completed by either the Director of Financial Aid, the Assistant Director of Financial Aid or another qualified FAA. Once completed and signed off, the verification packet is place into the permanent individual student?s file.

SPECIAL TESTS AND PROVISIONS ? RETURN OF TITLE IV FUNDS West Virginia State University, Pierpont Community College, Bluefield State University, New River Community and Technical College, and West Liberty University Assistance Listing Number 84.007, 84.033, 84.038, 84.063, 84.268, 84.379, 93.264, 93.342, 93.364, 93.925 West Virginia State University (WVSU) response Effective January 2022, a weekly report of complete withdraw students is generated and an initial review and calculations are performed by a Financial Aid Administrator. A second review of the student?s record and calculations are then completed a second time by the Associate Director of Financial Aid or the Director of Financial Aid. After the second review is complete, the initial reviewer will update the student account accordingly and perform any Return of Title IV (R2T4) funds needed. The second reviewer will confirm that updates are accurate. Both the initial and second reviewer will sign off on R2T4 calculation documentation for the student's file. Pierpont Community and Technical College (PCTC) response Communication between the Financial Aid and the Finance offices will be enhanced to ensure Finance has a copy of the student letter and additional Finance Office staff now have access to the return of Title IV (R2T4) tracking sheet. The R2T4 tracking sheet will be monitored by both the Financial Aid and Finance staff to ensure all refunds are returned within the required 45-day time period. This process was implemented in January 2023. Bluefield State University (BSU) response In January 2023, BSU implemented controls to perform the Return of Title IV (R2T4) withdrawal and calculation to ensure that records comply and that return of R2T4 funds are within the required time frame of 45 days. Controls include the review of ?Permit to Withdraw? forms to ensure they are completed with all signatures of the offices involved and the sign-off of R2T4 calculations. All reviews will occur within the time frame of 45 days by the Interim Financial Director along with Business Office and Accounting. In December 2022, the Interim Financial Aid Director spoke with the Registrar and the Financial Aid Counselor in separate meetings regarding the late submission of withdrawal forms and performing the R2T4 calculations. The Registrar understands they must submit the completed withdrawal forms to the Financial Aid office the same day they are completed by her office. When the forms are received by Financial Aid an R2T4 will be completed within the same week of receipt and sent to the Business Office if a return of Title IV Aid is required. The Business Office will then review the calculations and perform the necessary repayment of Title IV Aid to the Department of Ed, utilizing the refund process through G5 within the required 45 day timeline. All adjustments to the students account will be made within the same time frame. New River Community and Technical College (NRCTC) response The Registrar's office will request the error report from IT. At that point the Registrar?s office will work on correcting the errors on the report. The Registrar?s office will request IT to run the error report again to make sure all errors are clear. Once all errors are clear from the report the Registrar?s office will request IT to send the enrollment report so that it can be submitted to the National Student Clearinghouse (the Clearinghouse). Once the enrollment report is received from IT someone in the Registrar?s office will upload the report in the Clearinghouse. The Registrar?s office will make sure the Clearinghouse report is submitted by the due date and errors sent by the Clearinghouse are corrected in a timely manner. The Registrar's office will run a random selection of 20 students from the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) to make sure students are correct in the Clearinghouse, which will be done at least 50 days out from the time students were initially reported. IT and someone in the Registrar?s office will sign off on these processes when the report is run, when the report is reviewed, and once the report is sent. The Registrar's will run the Failure Irregular Withdrawal report daily, instead of weekly to ensure all students who have not attended classes are taken out within a timely manner as soon as they are reported by the instructors. These procedures were implemented in August 2022. West Liberty University (WLU) response When the Registrar Office is recording and entering data for Withdrawal (WD) students, a review and approval process has been implemented to ensure dates and information are entered accurately and timely.

SPECIAL TESTS AND PROVISION ? UI PROGRAM INTEGRITY - OVERPAYMENTS Workforce West Virginia (WWV) Assistance Listing Number 17.225, COVID-19 17.225 WWV will provide training to all Unemployment Insurance claim staff by March 2023 and review procedures related to the establishment of overpayments.

Finding ref number: 2022-002 Finding caption: The District did not have adequate internal controls for ensuring compliance with allowable activities and costs and restricted purpose requirements. Name, address, and telephone of School District contact person: Heather C. Pinkerton 310 SW 16th St Chehalis, WA 98532 360-807-7207 Corrective action the auditee plans to take in response to the finding: The Chehalis School District does not concur with the finding or the questioned costs. The State Auditor?s Office (SAO) reviewed various types of documentation and did not accept documentation presented by the District to reduce or eliminate questioned costs. The standard of documentation required by SAO to satisfy ?unmet need? would have been hard to meet even if the District hadn?t been in the midst of a pandemic. The District has internal controls over asset inventory and provided equipment only to students and staff with unmet needs, and all costs were allowable, reasonable and necessary. We continue to communicate with other agencies with the ultimate goal of helping the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) understand that they should not seek any recovery of funds resulting from ?documentation? issues considering the massive public health response, deployment logistics, vague federal guidance, and the effective return to in-person learning. Along with countless other districts across the State of Washington, we look forward to working with the FCC to resolve this finding. We appreciate the guidance that was provided by the FCC, as noted below. Guidance from the FCC Devices for remote learning could also be used at school. During the pandemic in Washington State we experienced times when classrooms, schools and or districts were closed by health department and state regulations because of outbreaks. Districts had to be prepared to support remote learning each day with constantly changing guidance on who was allowed to be in person. The following guidance from the Federal Communications Commission, titled ?Emergency Connectivity Fund Common Misconceptions?, ?Misconception #2: If schools have returned to in-class instruction for the upcoming school year, they are not eligible to participate. Answer: This is false. Equipment and services provided to students or school staff who would otherwise lack sufficient access to connected devices, and/or broadband internet access connection while off campus are eligible for Emergency Connectivity Fund Support.? From the Federal Communications Commission Order FCC-CIRC21-93-043021, question 77: ?We think schools are in the best position to determine whether their students and staff have devices and broadband services sufficient to meet their remote learning needs, and we recognize that they are making such decisions in the midst of a pandemic. We, therefore, will not impose any specific metrics or process requirements on those determinations.? And from question 53: ??we are sensitive to the need to provide some flexibility during this uncertain time. If those connected devices were purchased for the purpose of providing students?with devices for off-campus use consistent with the rules we adopt today, we will not prohibit such on-campus use.? Corrective action the auditee plans to take in response to the finding: The Chehalis School District does not concur with the finding or the questioned costs. The State Auditor?s Office (SAO) reviewed various types of documentation and did not accept documentation presented by the District to reduce or eliminate questioned costs. The standard of documentation required by SAO to satisfy ?unmet need? would have been hard to meet even if the District hadn?t been in the midst of a pandemic. The District has internal controls over asset inventory and provided equipment only to students and staff with unmet needs, and all costs were allowable, reasonable and necessary. We continue to communicate with other agencies with the ultimate goal of helping the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) understand that they should not seek any recovery of funds resulting from ?documentation? issues considering the massive public health response, deployment logistics, vague federal guidance, and the effective return to in-person learning. Along with countless other districts across the State of Washington, we look forward to working with the FCC to resolve this finding. We appreciate the guidance that was provided by the FCC, as noted below. Guidance from the FCC Devices for remote learning could also be used at school. During the pandemic in Washington State we experienced times when classrooms, schools and or districts were closed by health department and state regulations because of outbreaks. Districts had to be prepared to support remote learning each day with constantly changing guidance on who was allowed to be in person. The following guidance from the Federal Communications Commission, titled ?Emergency Connectivity Fund Common Misconceptions?, ?Misconception #2: If schools have returned to in-class instruction for the upcoming school year, they are not eligible to participate. Answer: This is false. Equipment and services provided to students or school staff who would otherwise lack sufficient access to connected devices, and/or broadband internet access connection while off campus are eligible for Emergency Connectivity Fund Support.? From the Federal Communications Commission Order FCC-CIRC21-93-043021, question 77: ?We think schools are in the best position to determine whether their students and staff have devices and broadband services sufficient to meet their remote learning needs, and we recognize that they are making such decisions in the midst of a pandemic. We, therefore, will not impose any specific metrics or process requirements on those determinations.? And from question 53: ??we are sensitive to the need to provide some flexibility during this uncertain time. If those connected devices were purchased for the purpose of providing students?with devices for off-campus use consistent with the rules we adopt today, we will not prohibit such on-campus use.? Anticipated date to complete the corrective action: We will work with the FCC to resolve this issue according to their timeline.