(A) The Department agrees with this finding. The Department is moving all adjudication and investigation of program integrity holds into the MyUI+ system, so there will be one system of record. The Department will ensure that all program integrity holds have all documentation through adjudication an...
(A) The Department agrees with this finding. The Department is moving all adjudication and investigation of program integrity holds into the MyUI+ system, so there will be one system of record. The Department will ensure that all program integrity holds have all documentation through adjudication and investigation, including log notes. The Department anticipates this to be fully implemented by July 2024. (B) The Department agrees with this finding. The department has modified processes to ensure all holds are only routed to the appropriate team to be adjudicated. In addition the Department is working to have all claims identified as fraud delivered in a workflow process in MyUI+ rather than the various processes in place now. Further the department is working with our MyUI+ system experts to implement new technology to strengthen and streamline the fraud indicator escalation process and systems within MyUI+. In working with our MyUI+ system experts, the Department anticipates this to be fully implemented by July 2024. (C) The Department agrees with this finding. The Department will continue strengthening security in this area and internal procedures to periodically monitor the potential for internal fraud activities. Additionally, the Department will periodically monitor and review My UI+ access levels for appropriateness. In consultation with our MyUI+ systems experts, the Department anticipates this finding to be fully implemented by July 2024. (D) The Department agrees with this finding. The Department will reinforce and strengthen the ethics policies in yearly communication to staff and tighten escalation policies to ensure pressures and inappropriate requests are handled in accordance with guidelines. The Department anticipates this will be completed by July 2023. (E) When a PI hold is identified as being highly suspicious for criminally fraudulent activity, it is routed to a specialized unit for review, thereby leaving the standard adjudication process. This is handled by passing the review to the UI Investigations and/or Criminal Enforcement (ICE) unit. The investigator performs their investigation and if no actual fraudulent activity is found they will release the hold. The UI Division also performs several quality control reviews of claims and claim decisions via Benefits Payment Control (BPC), Benefits Accuracy Measurements (BAM), Benefits Timeliness and Quality (BTQ), and internal Quality Assurance (QA) reviews. Claims are reviewed for such criteria as adequate support documentation, benefit payment accuracy, timely processing, and correct claim decision determination on all program integrity holds. The Green Book states in Section 10.14, ? If segregation of duties is not practical within an operational process because of limited personnel or other factors, management designs alternative control activities to address the risk of fraud, waste, or abuse in the operational process.? CDLE believes the reviews represent adequate and sufficient compensating controls for the need for segregation of duties on fraud holds. Changing the current process would hinder our ability to deliver UI benefit services timely to our customers and would put us in jeopardy of fulfilling our federal and state payment timeliness requirements.