Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
61,436
In database
Filtered Results
20,158
Matching current filters
Showing Page
29 of 807
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Project Legal Name: Evangeline Booth Friendship House Residence, Inc., A Texas Corporation HUD Project No.: 113- EE041 Audit Firm: CohnReznick LLP Period covered by the audit: 10/1/24-9/30/25 Corrective Action Plan prepared by: Name: Philip Gesner Position: Financial Project Manager, USA Southern Te...
Project Legal Name: Evangeline Booth Friendship House Residence, Inc., A Texas Corporation HUD Project No.: 113- EE041 Audit Firm: CohnReznick LLP Period covered by the audit: 10/1/24-9/30/25 Corrective Action Plan prepared by: Name: Philip Gesner Position: Financial Project Manager, USA Southern Territory Finance Department Telephone Number: 470-816-5977 A. Current Findings on the Schedule of Findings, Questioned Costs and Recommendations 1. Finding 2025-001 a. Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation The auditee agrees with the finding. The auditee agrees with the recommendation to reimburse the project for overpaid management fee in the amount of $466 and implement procedures to ensure that the management fee paid does not exceed the amount determined in accordance with the management agreement. b. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding Management will repay the property and update our procedures to correctly calculate management fees.
2. Finding 2025-002 a. Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation The auditee agrees with the finding. The auditee agrees with the recommendation to deposit $21,146 into the replacement reserve account or obtain evidence of HUD approval. b. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding Management a...
2. Finding 2025-002 a. Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation The auditee agrees with the finding. The auditee agrees with the recommendation to deposit $21,146 into the replacement reserve account or obtain evidence of HUD approval. b. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding Management acknowledges that two replacement reserve withdrawals dated February 14, 2025 were processed prior to obtaining HUD's written approval. This occurred due to a temporary lapse in oversight during a staff absence. We will attempt to retroactively obtain HUD approval for the withdrawal.
Management's Response and Planned Corrective Action: This finding relates primarily to the submission of annual grant reports SF-271 and SF-425, which are required by the FAA to be filed each year. The SF-271 (Outlay Report and Request for Reimbursement) are used to report project expenditures and r...
Management's Response and Planned Corrective Action: This finding relates primarily to the submission of annual grant reports SF-271 and SF-425, which are required by the FAA to be filed each year. The SF-271 (Outlay Report and Request for Reimbursement) are used to report project expenditures and request reimbursement of federal funds. It shows how much of the grant has been spent (outlays) and how much reimbursement is being requested from the funding agency. SF-425 (Federal Financial Report) provides a comprehensive summary of the financial status of a grant, including total expenditures, federal funds used, recipient cost share (if applicable), and remaining balances, to ensure proper accountability and compliance with grant requirements. Although these reports were submitted after the established due dates, management maintained the reporting requirements as an active and ongoing priority. These reports were regularly discussed during monthly coordination meetings involving Airport staff and the FAA Airports District Office (ADO), as well as during weekly internal staff meetings. During these regular discussions with the FAA ADO, the Airport was not advised that it was out of compliance with reporting deadlines. Rather, the FAA consistently indicated that reports should be submitted as soon as practicable. The Airport remained aware of its reporting obligations and their importance, particularly in support of ongoing efforts to secure funding for the terminal expansion project. Notwithstanding the above, management acknowledges that formal tracking mechanisms and documented follow-up procedures can be strengthened to ensure earlier identification and resolution of incomplete or missing grant data. To address this, management will enhance internal controls over grant reporting to ensure timely and complete submissions. Improvements will include implementing calendar-based tracking tools and structured notification procedures, with reminders and follow-up communications beginning at the FAA fiscal year-end (September 30) and continuing through the reporting due date (December 31). Additionally, management will coordinate with the FAA and MDOT to secure reliable access to the FAA’s Delphi System, where the data necessary to complete these reports resides. Communication with both the FAA ADO and MDOT will be further strengthened during the critical period leading up to reporting deadlines to ensure that any missing or incomplete information is promptly identified and addressed. Regular internal discussions regarding grant reporting status will also continue to support timely resolution of outstanding items. Management believes these corrective actions will mitigate the risk of delayed or incomplete reporting and strengthen overall compliance with grant requirements. Responsible Party for Corrective Action: Mark Bishop, Chief Financial Officer Anticipated Completion Date: June 2026.
Segregation of Duties
Segregation of Duties
Name of Contact Person: Connie Wold, City Treasurer
Name of Contact Person: Connie Wold, City Treasurer
Correction Action: The finance related tasks will be separated as much as possible and alternative controls will be used to compensate for the lack of separation. The City Council will become more involved in providing some of these controls.
Correction Action: The finance related tasks will be separated as much as possible and alternative controls will be used to compensate for the lack of separation. The City Council will become more involved in providing some of these controls.
Proposed Completion Date: The City Council will implement the above procedures immediately.
Proposed Completion Date: The City Council will implement the above procedures immediately.
Finding 2025-001 - Internal Controls and Accounting for Capital Fund Grants – Cash Management and Special Tests and Provisions – Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency Capital Fund Grant Program ALN #14.872 Public and Indian Housing ALN #14.850 Corrective Action Plan: The Housing Authority of the ...
Finding 2025-001 - Internal Controls and Accounting for Capital Fund Grants – Cash Management and Special Tests and Provisions – Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency Capital Fund Grant Program ALN #14.872 Public and Indian Housing ALN #14.850 Corrective Action Plan: The Housing Authority of the City of Greenville (HACG) has implemented and/or will implement the following by our fiscal year September 30, 2026: a. Accounting staff will be sent to Capital Fund Training. b. Funds will be drawn and paid within 3 days of receipt. c. Funds will be drawn from appropriate BLI and distributed to the eligible line number. d. Grant end dates will be monitored to prevent loss of funding. Person Responsible: Joseph L Regan, Chief Financial Officer Anticipated Completion Date: September 30, 2026
INVOICE CODING - Criteria: Costs are necessary and reasonable for the performance of the federal award and allocable under the principles of 2 CFR 200, Subpart E. Condition: One invoice charged to the grant in the amount of $1,955 should have been allocated to a different grant. Context: Internal co...
INVOICE CODING - Criteria: Costs are necessary and reasonable for the performance of the federal award and allocable under the principles of 2 CFR 200, Subpart E. Condition: One invoice charged to the grant in the amount of $1,955 should have been allocated to a different grant. Context: Internal control review procedures did not correctly identify that the invoice was charged to the incorrect grant. Effect: Cost was charged to the wrong grant. Cause: Error in invoice coding. Recommendation: Review procedures should be enhanced to ensure approved costs are charged to the appropriate grant. Corrective Action: This mistake of grant attribution was subsequently corrected completely. The issue was attributable to a manual process that has been replaced by electronic processing. The electronic procurement system significantly reduces and in most cases eliminates data entry and manual translation between procurement and posting to a particular grant. Adequate review and oversight processes are in place and this issue does not reflect a systemic failure. Responsible Party: Claudine Lurvey, VP of Finances.
Action Taken: The Department has taken immediate corrective action to address the deficiencies identified in the files audited. All noted discrepancies are being reviewed and are in the process of being corrected, and revised Form HUD-50058 submissions will be completed and transmitted, where requir...
Action Taken: The Department has taken immediate corrective action to address the deficiencies identified in the files audited. All noted discrepancies are being reviewed and are in the process of being corrected, and revised Form HUD-50058 submissions will be completed and transmitted, where required. The Department maintains established procedures, systems, and internal controls designed to support compliance with applicable HUD requirements. To further strengthen these controls, enhancements are currently underway to improve the timeliness of processing activities, ensure accurate and thorough income verification, and enforce proper application of abatements. Additionally, the Department is implementing more robust quality control (QC) measures to verify that all required documentation is consistently obtained, reviewed, and retained. To reinforce oversight, the Department is expanding its existing QC and Housing and Community Development (HCD) review processes. This includes the implementation of a front-line supervisory review of a representative sample of recertifications prior to the submission of Form HUD-50058. This added layer of review is intended to proactively identify and correct potential errors, ensuring accuracy, completeness, and full regulatory compliance. If the Department of Housing and Urban Development has questions regarding this plan, please call Nathan Kogon, Director at (786) 469-4120. The process to start correcting the issue discussed above is currently underway, and significant progress is expected for the next fiscal year end audit.
Finding 2025-005: Crime Victim Assistance Documented Review and Approval Procedures Type of Finding: Control U.S. Department of Justice Pass-through Entity: Michigan Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Number: 16.575 Award Numbers: E20253442-00, E20252994-00, E20254307-00, and...
Finding 2025-005: Crime Victim Assistance Documented Review and Approval Procedures Type of Finding: Control U.S. Department of Justice Pass-through Entity: Michigan Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Number: 16.575 Award Numbers: E20253442-00, E20252994-00, E20254307-00, and E20252103-00 Award Year End: September 30, 2025 Recommendation: The Organization should expand its financial reporting review procedures to require the documented review and approval of all performance reports by an individual with adequate skills, knowledge, and experience prior to submission. Action Taken: During the fiscal year, the Organization properly implemented procedures that require the documented review of the monthly financial reports, including the corresponding indirect cost calculations. The Organization will expand these policies and procedures to require the documented review and approval of all performance reports on a monthly basis prior to submission with documented approval. Responsible Person and Anticipated Completion Date: The Executive Director will oversee the implementation of this plan by June 30, 2026. If the U.S. Department of Justice has questions regarding this plan, please call Megan Hennessey at (616) 494-1724.
Finding 2025-004: MATERIAL WEAKNESS—Uniform Guidance Written Internal Control Procedures Type of Finding: Control U.S. Department of Justice Pass-through Entity: Michigan Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Number: 16.575 Award Numbers: E20253442-00, E20252994-00, E20254307-00...
Finding 2025-004: MATERIAL WEAKNESS—Uniform Guidance Written Internal Control Procedures Type of Finding: Control U.S. Department of Justice Pass-through Entity: Michigan Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Number: 16.575 Award Numbers: E20253442-00, E20252994-00, E20254307-00, and E20252103-00 Award Year End: September 30, 2025 Recommendation: The Organization should establish and maintain written internal control procedures that cover the required five components of internal control for each area of compliance for each of its federal programs. The Organization should educate all employees working with federal programs of the Organization’s procedures and monitor compliance with them. Action Taken: The Organization will establish the necessary policies and procedures for managing its federal awards in compliance with federal requirements. Responsible Person and Anticipated Completion Date: The Executive Director will oversee the implementation of this plan by June 30, 2026. If the U.S. Department of Justice has questions regarding this plan, please call Megan Hennessey at (616) 494-1724.
Condition Found: Through testing a statistically valid sample of 25 individual patient balances, we noted four instances in which the sliding fee discount applied was inconsistent with the Organization’s policy. Three patients did not receive the appropriate discount and one patient received a disco...
Condition Found: Through testing a statistically valid sample of 25 individual patient balances, we noted four instances in which the sliding fee discount applied was inconsistent with the Organization’s policy. Three patients did not receive the appropriate discount and one patient received a discount but did not have an active sliding fee application for the service date the sliding fee discount was applied. Individual(s) Responsible for Corrective Action: Lori Slicer, Revenue Cycle Manager (organization-wide sliding fee discount monitoring procedure across the medical and dental service lines). Crystal Kinsman, Dental Practice Manager (dental-specific monitoring, with increased sampling of the Dental system given its higher level of manual processing). Heidi Melbostad, Chief Executive Officer and Compliance Officer (sliding fee discount schedule redesign and oversight). Planned Corrective Action: Management is addressing this finding through both an immediate interim action and a comprehensive redesign, together with an ongoing monitoring control. Interim action (completed): the Board approved revised nominal fee levels on 2026-04-27, effective 2026-04-28, establishing Category A as the most favorable discount category, consistent with Section 330(k)(3)(G) of the Public Health Service Act. Full corrective action: management will complete a comprehensive redesign of the Sliding Fee Discount Program, including separate schedules for the medical and dental service lines, data-driven evaluation of tier thresholds and fee levels, and replacement of the percentage-based payment option with a clearer flat-fee structure, for Board review and approval. Ongoing monitoring control: management will establish a documented monitoring procedure over sliding fee discount application across both the medical and dental service lines, including a defined monthly sample drawn from each service line with increased sampling of the Dental system given its higher level of manual processing, verification that an active sliding fee application is on file for each service date, documented review results, timely correction of identified errors, and supervisory sign-off, with error rates reviewed at least quarterly. Anticipated Completion Date: Interim nominal fee revision effective 2026-04-28 (completed). Comprehensive Sliding Fee Discount Program redesign and ongoing monitoring procedure to be Board-approved and operational by 2026-08-24.
Finding 1218248 (2025-001)
Material Weakness 2025
Valorus
CA
Finding 2025-001 – Accuracy of Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) The ALN numbers identified as incorrect were on 16.588 & 16.575 under the Violence Against Women Formula Grant. These two numbers were inadvertently transposed during preparation of the SEFA. Out of the 20 ALN numbers r...
Finding 2025-001 – Accuracy of Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) The ALN numbers identified as incorrect were on 16.588 & 16.575 under the Violence Against Women Formula Grant. These two numbers were inadvertently transposed during preparation of the SEFA. Out of the 20 ALN numbers reported, only these two were inaccurate. All expenditures reported on the SEFA were based on actual expenditures incurred consistent with prior guidance provided by the auditor. During the previous audit cycle, VALOR’s accountant sought clarification regarding whether expenditures should be reported based on actual expenditures or reimbursement amounts and was instructed to use actual expenditures incurred. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.510(b), auditees must prepare a SEFA that accurately identifies programs by the correct ALN and reports expenditures based on actual amounts expended from federal awards. Except for the inadvertent transposition of the two ALN numbers noted above, the SEFA was prepared in compliance with these requirements. As a corrective action, beginning with the next SEFA report for the 2025-2026 fiscal year, the SEFA will be prepared by the Senior Accountant, Karen Sayers, and reviewed by both the Director of Operations, Rosemary Gonzales, and the organization’s CPA, Kim Jones, prior to submission to verify the accuracy of all ALN numbers and reported amounts.
Finding 2025-002: Eligibility – Untimely Recertifications Type: Significant Deficiency Condition: During testing of tenant files, the auditor identified fourteen instances in which 2025 annual recertifications were not completed in a timely manner. Recertifications were performed in the subsequent y...
Finding 2025-002: Eligibility – Untimely Recertifications Type: Significant Deficiency Condition: During testing of tenant files, the auditor identified fourteen instances in which 2025 annual recertifications were not completed in a timely manner. Recertifications were performed in the subsequent year, and effective dates were backdated to reflect the current year. Management agrees with the finding and acknowledges the need to strengthen internal controls over tenant file compliance. To address this issue, management will implement a formalized tracking system for annual recertifications to ensure they are completed timely with accurate effective dates. Additionally, supervisory review and approval procedures will be enhanced prior to finalizing tenant rent changes. A. The Compliance Manager will oversee the compliance department and ensure staff complete recertifications prior to required effective dates. B. The Property Manager will conduct weekly meetings with staff to review upcoming recertifications and monitor progress to ensure timeliness. C. Management is in the process of hiring additional staff dedicated to processing recertifications to improve timeliness and compliance. Contact for Corrective Action: Cornelia Reith anticipated Completion date:12/31/26
Management has established processes and procedures for documenting approvals for ACH transactions.
Management has established processes and procedures for documenting approvals for ACH transactions.
Federal Program: Consolidated Health Centers Grant Assistance Listing No. 93.224 & 93.527 Recommendation: Our auditors recommend the Organization to review internal controls in regards to the determination, recording, and monitoring of the sliding fee process to ensure that appropriate sliding fee r...
Federal Program: Consolidated Health Centers Grant Assistance Listing No. 93.224 & 93.527 Recommendation: Our auditors recommend the Organization to review internal controls in regards to the determination, recording, and monitoring of the sliding fee process to ensure that appropriate sliding fee rates/categories are utilized for each sliding fee encounter and that all documentation supporting the sliding discount provided is retained. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: These errors are due to incorrect slide percentage amounts being put into eCW. There is also a known issue within eCW where the eCW changes the slide amount to either 100% or a different slide than was entered. The Organization has found a work around so that the Organization can fix this issue before claims are adjusted. Billing will start reviewing slide documents prior to applying slide to make sure that the percentage entered into eCW is correct for income/family size. These will also be reviewed by the front desk manager and lead patient service representative.
Federal Program: Consolidated Health Centers Grant Assistance Listing No. 93.224 & 93.527 Recommendation: Our auditors recommend the Organization to review internal controls in regards to the approval of federal fund drawdown requests. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disa...
Federal Program: Consolidated Health Centers Grant Assistance Listing No. 93.224 & 93.527 Recommendation: Our auditors recommend the Organization to review internal controls in regards to the approval of federal fund drawdown requests. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Organization is in agreement with finding. The control issue was due to turnover in finance staff during fiscal year 2025. Under the direction of the Organization’s new CFO, the following revised procedures for cash management have been implemented for fiscal year 2026: • Payroll Documentation: A staff accountant or the controller will compile payroll expense details along with supporting documentation for each drawdown. • Review and Approval: This documentation is submitted to the CFO for review prior to any fund transfer. • Drawdown Execution: Upon approval, the CFO will initiate the drawdown from PMS. • Frequency: Drawdowns are processed on a biweekly basis and reflect expenses from the preceding payroll cycle. Upon completion of the drawdown, the CFO will save a copy of the drawdown request to the internal drive. • This drawdown receipt is reviewed by a second staff member, either the controller or senior accountant. • Drawdowns are also reviewed during monthly bank reconciliations.
Child Care and Nutrition, Inc. respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended September 30, 2025. Audit period: October 1, 2024-September 30, 2025 The findings from the September 30, 2025 schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The findings are nu...
Child Care and Nutrition, Inc. respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended September 30, 2025. Audit period: October 1, 2024-September 30, 2025 The findings from the September 30, 2025 schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. FINDINGS – FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT MATERIAL WEAKNESS 2025-001 Internal Accounting Controls Recommendation: We recommend management be aware to the lack of segregation of duties within the accounting functions and provide oversight to ensure the internal control policies and procedures are being implemented by organization staff. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Organization will continue to review the accounting functions of all affected departments so segregate them as it is cost beneficial. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Sherri Looft, Executive Director Planned completion date for corrective action plan: September 30, 2026. MATERIAL WEAKNESS 2025-002 Annual Financial Reporting Under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Recommendation: Management should continue to evaluate their internal staff capacity to determine if an internal control policy over the annual financial reporting is beneficial. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Organization understands this is required communications for the preparation of the financial statements and will continue to work at this area to achieve the overall goal. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Sherri Looft, Executive Director Planned completion date for corrective action plan: September 30, 2026. FINDINGS – FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS 2025-003 Internal Accounting Controls Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program: Child and Adult Care Food Program CFDA Number: 10.558 Pass Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education, Child Nutrition Section Pass Through Number: 1000003400 Award Periods: Year ended September 30, 2025 Recommendation: We recommend management be aware to the lack of segregation of duties within the accounting functions and provide oversight to ensure the internal control policies and procedures are being implemented by organization staff. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Organization will continue to review the accounting functions of all affected departments so segregate them as it is cost beneficial. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Sherri Looft, Executive Director Planned completion date for corrective action plan: September 30, 2026.
Contact Person Patricia Heraty, Accountant Corrective Action Plan Management plans to review its internal control procedures to ensure a quality control review is performed to verify all required documentation and calculations are maintained in the tenant files. Planned Completion Date for CAP Immed...
Contact Person Patricia Heraty, Accountant Corrective Action Plan Management plans to review its internal control procedures to ensure a quality control review is performed to verify all required documentation and calculations are maintained in the tenant files. Planned Completion Date for CAP Immediately.
Criteria: The Organization is responsible for sending the following reports to the USDA: FYE 12-31-2024 Audit, FY 2026 Budget, Quarterly reports for 3/30/2026, 6/30/2 025, and 9/30/2025, and Certification of Insurance. Condition: During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & ...
Criteria: The Organization is responsible for sending the following reports to the USDA: FYE 12-31-2024 Audit, FY 2026 Budget, Quarterly reports for 3/30/2026, 6/30/2 025, and 9/30/2025, and Certification of Insurance. Condition: During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & Grants, we identified that the required reports were not sent to the USDA. Cause: The requirement was not met due to an oversight by management. Effect: As a result the agency reserves the right to withdraw Agency funding. Recommendation: The Organization should create a checklist to track/remind management to send the required reports to the USDA as well create a monthly electronic calendar reminder Client Response: The facility has submitted the required reports and added items to their monthly checklist and calendar for future reporting periods. Conclusion: Response accepted.
Criteria: The Organization is responsible for depositing $10,343 into a separate general ledger account every month to fund the restricted debt service reserve and they must obtain permission before using the funds. Condition: During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & Gra...
Criteria: The Organization is responsible for depositing $10,343 into a separate general ledger account every month to fund the restricted debt service reserve and they must obtain permission before using the funds. Condition: During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & Grants, we identified that the funds were not deposited for several of the required months and the funds were not in a separate general ledger account. Cause: The requirement was not met due to an oversight by management. Effect: As a result the agency reserves the right to withdraw Agency funding. Recommendation: The Organization should setup a separate general ledger account to separate the required funds, and have a review process to verify that the deposits were made properly. Client Response: The Organization has automated a reoccurring ACH that deposits $10,343 into the reserve account every month and funded the balance to the required amount. The bookkeeping company and management have added a reserve account review to their monthly checklist. Conclusion: Response accepted.
Criteria: The Organization is responsible for sending the following reports to the USDA: FYE 12-31-2024 Audit, FY 2026 Budget, Quarterly reports for 3/30/2025, 6/30/2025, and 9/30/2025, and Certification of Insurance. Condition: During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & G...
Criteria: The Organization is responsible for sending the following reports to the USDA: FYE 12-31-2024 Audit, FY 2026 Budget, Quarterly reports for 3/30/2025, 6/30/2025, and 9/30/2025, and Certification of Insurance. Condition: During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & Grants, we identified that the required reports were not sent to the USDA. Cause: The requirement was not met due to an oversight by management. Effect: As a result the agency reserves the right to withdraw Agency funding. Recommendation: The Organization should create a checklist to track/remind management to send the required reports to the USDA as well create a monthly electronic calendar reminder Client Response: The facility has submitted the required reports and added items to their monthly checklist and calendar for future reporting periods. Conclusion: Response accepted.
Criteria: The Organization is responsible for depositing $10,343 into a separate general ledger account every month to fund the restricted debt service reserve and they must obtain permission before using the funds. Condition: During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & Gra...
Criteria: The Organization is responsible for depositing $10,343 into a separate general ledger account every month to fund the restricted debt service reserve and they must obtain permission before using the funds. Condition: During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & Grants, we identified that the funds were not deposited for several of the required months and the funds were not in a separate general ledger account. Cause: The requirement was not met due to an oversight by management. Effect: As a result the agency reserves the right to withdraw Agency funding. Recommendation: The Organization should setup a separate general ledger account to separate the required funds, and have a review process to verify that the deposits were made properly. Client Response: The Organization has automated a reoccurring ACH that deposits $10,343 into the reserve account every month and funded the balance to the required amount. The bookkeeping company and management have added a reserve account review to their monthly checklist. Conclusion: Response accepted.
Management recognized the importance of timely bank reconciliations and accurate financial reporting. The District has implemented procedures requiring all bank reconciliations to be completed and reviewed within 30 days of month-end. A reconciliation checklist has been established to ensure all bal...
Management recognized the importance of timely bank reconciliations and accurate financial reporting. The District has implemented procedures requiring all bank reconciliations to be completed and reviewed within 30 days of month-end. A reconciliation checklist has been established to ensure all balance sheet accounts are reviewed and reconciled monthly. Management will also perform periodic reviews of the general ledger throughout the year to identify and correct discrepancies before year-end. In addition, the District will provide additional training to accounting personnel regarding month-end closing procedures and financial reporting requirements.
« 1 27 28 30 31 807 »