2024-001 Eligibility – Tenant Files
Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program – CFDA Number 14.871
Mainstream – Vouchers CFDA Number 14.879
Material Weakness in Internal Control and Material Noncompliance
This is a repeat finding (the prior year finding was a significant deficiency) of 2023-002 from...
2024-001 Eligibility – Tenant Files
Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program – CFDA Number 14.871
Mainstream – Vouchers CFDA Number 14.879
Material Weakness in Internal Control and Material Noncompliance
This is a repeat finding (the prior year finding was a significant deficiency) of 2023-002 from March 31, 2023 (initially occurred as Finding 2021-003, Significant Deficiency)
Condition: Out of a total tenant population of approximately 1,775 tenants, 25 files were selected for testing. Exceptions were noted as follows:
• 1 tenant file had the following errors:
o Miscalculation of social security income reported on the form 50058 (used a prior year SSI instead of the current year). Correcting this error would decrease the HAP rent from $1,610 to $1,567.
o One missing 214-affidavit form for a member of the household. However, based on the birth certificate, the member of the household is a U.S. citizen.
• 1 tenant file had the following errors:
o Two members of the household did not check the checkbox on the 214-affidavit form indicating their immigration status. However, based on the birth certificates, the two household members are U.S. citizens.
o The 9886 form was not dated. Thus, we do not know if the 9886 form was signed within 15 month required timeframe.
• 1 tenant file had the following errors:
o Missing 214-affidavit form for a member of the household. However, based on the birth certificate, the member of the household is a U.S. citizen.
o The tenant did not sign and date the Form 9886.
• 1 tenant file had the following errors and correcting the errors would increase the HAP rent from $1,130 to $1,159:
o Miscalculation of social security income reported on the 50058.
o Miscalculation of medical expense reported on the 50058.
• 1 tenant file error where a member of the household over the age of 18 did not sign the Form 9886.
• 1 tenant file error where social security income was calculated incorrectly. Correcting the income would decrease the HAP rent from $1,155 to $1,153.
• 1 tenant file error where a member of the household over the age of 18 did not sign the 9886.
• 1 tenant file error where the tenant dated the year on the 9886 form 2013 when it should be 2023.
• 1 tenant file error where a member of the household over 18 years old did not sign Form 9886.
• 1 tenant file error where the tenant’s wage income was miscalculated. However, correcting the error would have no effect on the HAP rent amount.
• 1 tenant file error where there was no EIV form for the recertification period.
• 1 tenant file error where tenant wage income was calculated incorrectly. Correcting these income issues would decrease the HAP rent from $1,207 to $896.
• 1 tenant file had the following errors and correcting the errors would decrease the HAP rent from $1,378 to $1,030:
o An incorrect utility allowance was reported on the Form 50058.
o Income support was not reported correctly on the Form 50058.
• 1 tenant file had the following errors:
o A member of the household did not check the checkbox on the 214-affidavit form indicating their immigration status. However, based on the birth certificate, the household member is a U.S. citizen.
o Support for tenant’s pension income was over 12 months old.
• 1 tenant file error where child support income was calculated incorrectly. However, correcting the error would have no effect on the HAP rent amount.
Recommendation: The Authority should correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and utilize an ongoing quality control review process on the entire tenant population to ensure proper compliance with the requirements related to tenant eligibility. Ongoing staff training and timely management reviews should be utilized to ensure staff is aware of acceptable procedures. In addition, the Authority should review staffing levels, skill sets and case load.
Action Taken: We concur with the recommendation. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and related staff absences and turnover, we were unable to provide an ongoing quality control review processes and provide ongoing staff training and timely management reviews. We are focused on implementing such procedures and will review staffing levels, skill sets, and case load for each employee.1 tenant file error where the Form 50058 reported an incorrect utility allowance, but correcting the allowance would not change the HAP rent amount.