Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
59,974
In database
Filtered Results
10,416
Matching current filters
Showing Page
110 of 417
25 per page

Filters

Clear
2024-005 Education Stabilization Fund – COVID 19 – Assistance Listing No. 84.425, Allowable Costs/Activities Allowed RECOMMENDATION: The School Board should take steps to ensure that all required approvals are properly documented on official forms. Corrective Action Plan: The School System has imple...
2024-005 Education Stabilization Fund – COVID 19 – Assistance Listing No. 84.425, Allowable Costs/Activities Allowed RECOMMENDATION: The School Board should take steps to ensure that all required approvals are properly documented on official forms. Corrective Action Plan: The School System has implemented necessary controls to ensure that all documents and official forms for payroll contain the necessary approvals prior to processing timesheets for payment. Anticipated Completion Date: Immediately and Ongoing.
The District has instituted an internal control to ensure employee payroll coding is reviewed year-to-year as program changes are made.
The District has instituted an internal control to ensure employee payroll coding is reviewed year-to-year as program changes are made.
View Audit 357724 Questioned Costs: $1
1. Explanation of Disagreement with Audit Finding There is no disagreement with the audit finding. 2. Actions Planned in Response to Finding: The City will create policies to be adopted by the Council. 3. Official Responsible for Ensuring CAP: Katie Steen, City Clerk, and Dan Joel, Superintendent of...
1. Explanation of Disagreement with Audit Finding There is no disagreement with the audit finding. 2. Actions Planned in Response to Finding: The City will create policies to be adopted by the Council. 3. Official Responsible for Ensuring CAP: Katie Steen, City Clerk, and Dan Joel, Superintendent of the Utilities, are the officials responsible for ensuring corrective action of the finding. 4. Planned Completion Date for CAP: The planned completion date is December 31, 2025. 5. Plan to Monitor Completion of CAP: The Council will be monitoring this corrective action plan.
Condition: The Township engaged a contractor to perform procurement activities funded by the revenue loss component of their Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds award and did not have controls in place to ensure that the contractor was following the Township's procurement policy relate...
Condition: The Township engaged a contractor to perform procurement activities funded by the revenue loss component of their Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds award and did not have controls in place to ensure that the contractor was following the Township's procurement policy related to, specifically checking and ensuring vendors were not suspension and debarred prior to the Township entering into the agreements with the contractors. Planned Corrective Action: As part of the procurement process, the Township will require all contractors to provide documentation verifying that neither they nor their subcontractors are suspended or debarred from conducting business with federal agencies. This verification will be conducted through the federal System for Award Management (SAM.gov). To ensure compliance, procurement files will include printed or electronically saved screenshots from SAM.gov confirming the status of each contractor and subcontractor at the time of the contract award. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Wendy Hillman Anticipated Completion Date: 12/31/2025
The reconciliation process implemented in Finding 2024-001 includes a formal method of matching drawdowns to allowable expenditures. Each grant will continue to be tracked in a separate cost center and La Casa will document the reconciled expenditures in the general ledger to amounts drawn from eac...
The reconciliation process implemented in Finding 2024-001 includes a formal method of matching drawdowns to allowable expenditures. Each grant will continue to be tracked in a separate cost center and La Casa will document the reconciled expenditures in the general ledger to amounts drawn from each grant. The monthly reconciliation will be reviewed by the CFO to ensure that revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC 958-605 and that federal expenditures reported on the SEFA and financial statements comply with 2 CFR §§200.302, 200.303, and 200.305. The CFO will utilize the reconciliations to prepare the SF-425 filings and confirm that cumulative drawdowns reconcile to allowable costs and recorded revenues. All supporting documentation will be retained electronically and included in monthly close procedures.
Finding ref number: 2024-001 Finding caption: The District did not have adequate internal controls for ensuring compliance with federal eligibility and paid lunch equity requirements. Name, address, and telephone of Fife School District contact person: Dany Wanner, Business Services Director 1720 Oa...
Finding ref number: 2024-001 Finding caption: The District did not have adequate internal controls for ensuring compliance with federal eligibility and paid lunch equity requirements. Name, address, and telephone of Fife School District contact person: Dany Wanner, Business Services Director 1720 Oak St, Milton, WA 98354 (253) 517-1000 ext 29121 Corrective action the auditee plans to take in response to the finding: The Fife School District implemented the following to Ensure Adequate Internal Controls for Compliance with Federal Eligibility: The Business Services team and Nutrition Services staff have conducted a thorough review of the process of monthly paid lunch equity and modified its procedures including developing a checklist for the process to ensure that it is completed in a timely manner, signed/dated and saved both electronically and in hard copy on a shared district server folder. The Fife School District implemented the following to Ensure Adequate Internal Controls for the annual completion of the Paid Lunch Equity Tool. The Business Services team and Nutrition Services staff have conducted a thorough review of the process of completing both the PLE tool and GL 828 reconciliation and modified its procedures to ensure that it is completed, signed and saved both electronically and in hard copy on a shared district server folder. Further, the Business Services team and Nutrition Services staff have developed a checklist for the completion of the tool and the checking of the box that indicates that we will be opting not to increase meal prices, but instead to demonstrate using the GL 828 Reconciliation (signed and dated) that we have sufficient fund balance to offset the paid lunches and not utilize Federal funds, including calendar reminders and a shared Google Drive to hold all related documents and procedures. Anticipated date to complete the corrective action: 5/16/2025
Aging Cluster – Special Programs for the Aging, Title III, Part B – Assistance Listing No. 93.044 Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization consider updating its salaries and wages cost allocation methodology and process to reduce the frequency of manual adjustments based on review of indi...
Aging Cluster – Special Programs for the Aging, Title III, Part B – Assistance Listing No. 93.044 Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization consider updating its salaries and wages cost allocation methodology and process to reduce the frequency of manual adjustments based on review of individual time records and expense data and maximize the use of automated allocations based on employees’ time and effort records, effective compensation during work periods, and that are calculated in a consistent manner. We also recommend that the Organization maintain contemporaneous documentation supporting all cost allocations. Explanation of Disagreement With Audit Finding: Management does not agree with this finding. LSC program letter 22-5 emphasizes the importance of reconciliations of timekeeping reports with labor costs, distribution report or alternative reports. CLS prioritizes this practice of reconciliation and used it during the last months of 2024 to improve internal controls and minimize potential errors. We do not believe that CLA fully and fairly considered CLS’s thorough and complete reconciliation. A “material weakness” is defined as a deficiency “such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis.” Given that reconciliation is part of our internal control process used to prevent and detect/correct any errors, it should have been fully considered and is unfairly excluded from the review. For this reason, CLS considers that this is not a material weakness as the reconciliation caught and corrected these errors. Finally, the total amount of this finding is very low and should not rise to the level of material weakness. Action Taken in Response to Finding: The Organization will review this finding and current methodology and propose corrections as part of a broader review of its technologies. Name of the Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Silvia Zelaya, Finance Director Planned Completion Date for Corrective Action Plan: January 2026
View Audit 357595 Questioned Costs: $1
Legal Services Corporation Grants – Assistance Listing No. 09.706060 Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization consider updating its salaries, wages, employee benefit, and general expense cost allocation methodology and process to reduce the frequency of manual adjustments based on review ...
Legal Services Corporation Grants – Assistance Listing No. 09.706060 Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization consider updating its salaries, wages, employee benefit, and general expense cost allocation methodology and process to reduce the frequency of manual adjustments based on review of individual time records and expense data and maximize the use of automated allocations based on employees’ time and effort records, effective compensation during work periods, and that are calculated in a consistent manner. We also recommend that the Organization maintain contemporaneous documentation supporting all cost allocations. Explanation of Disagreement With Audit Finding: Management partially agrees with this finding. CLS recognizes manual miscalculations due to human errors but considers that the allocation methodology is correct. CLS is undertaking improvements oriented toward automatization of the process while recognizing that complete automatization is not possible without an expensive and complete overhaul of our systems. Action Taken in Response to Finding: The Organization will review this finding and current methodology and propose corrections as part of a broader review of its technologies. Name of the Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Silvia Zelaya, Finance Director Planned Completion Date for Corrective Action Plan: January 2026
Legal Services Corporation Grants – Assistance Listing No. 09.706060 Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization consider updating its cost allocation methodology and process to reduce the frequency of manual adjustments based on review of individual time records and expense data and maximiz...
Legal Services Corporation Grants – Assistance Listing No. 09.706060 Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization consider updating its cost allocation methodology and process to reduce the frequency of manual adjustments based on review of individual time records and expense data and maximize the use of automated allocations that are calculated in a consistent manner that ensure costs are applied uniformly to respective benefited activities, and that are reflective on employees’ time and effort records Explanation of Disagreement With Audit Finding: Management partially agrees with this finding. First, 45 CFR Part 1635 codifies the timekeeping requirement. CLS keeps track of every case and time dedicated by staff in strict compliance with this requirement. Additionally, the distribution of expenses in the general fund, which includes LSC and two other funding sources, represents a fair method and allocation. Regarding the questioned costs, CLS disagrees with the finding of material weakness given the extremely low total dollar value. Action Taken in Response to Finding: The Organization will review this finding and current methodology and propose corrections as part of a broader review of its technologies. Name of the Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Silvia Zelaya, Finance Director Planned Completion Date for Corrective Action Plan: January 2026
View Audit 357595 Questioned Costs: $1
BVCASA agrees with the audit finding and is working to complete the final assessment of the unallowable payroll costs and reallocate the expenses to the appropriate programs. Management will self-report on the total impact of the finding to HHSC within 60 days of the date of the audit report. Addi...
BVCASA agrees with the audit finding and is working to complete the final assessment of the unallowable payroll costs and reallocate the expenses to the appropriate programs. Management will self-report on the total impact of the finding to HHSC within 60 days of the date of the audit report. Additionally, management will ensure internal controls are strengthened over payroll processing and adequate reconciliations are performed each pay period to verify that payroll costs are allocated appropriately.
View Audit 357589 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding ref number: 2024-001 Finding caption: The District did not have adequate internal controls for ensuring compliance with federal eligibility and paid lunch equity requirements. Name, address, and telephone of District contact person: Marci Bannan, Director of Business Services 121 Whitesell S...
Finding ref number: 2024-001 Finding caption: The District did not have adequate internal controls for ensuring compliance with federal eligibility and paid lunch equity requirements. Name, address, and telephone of District contact person: Marci Bannan, Director of Business Services 121 Whitesell St NE Orting, WA 98360 Corrective action the auditee plans to take in response to the finding: Eligibility: The District will document the internal controls that are in place for the monthly direct certification downloads and will print the certification download along with saving it electronically so that the files are easy to provide for future audits. Paid Lunch Equity: The District will document the internal controls that are in place for the completion of the PLE tool and ensure that the form is completed appropriately to show the continued use of nonfederal funds that are used yearly to fund the food service account fully. The District will also make sure to ‘print’ the GL 828 tab of the Fund Balance Reporting tool that is done yearly no later than November and sign it immediately after completion of the year end process to provide for the proof that the district has and continues to contribute sufficient nonfederal funds to the food service account. Anticipated date to complete the corrective action: July 31, 2025
Finding 561904 (2024-002)
Significant Deficiency 2024
Corrective Action Plan: The identified conditions relate to the proper application and calculation of indirect cost rates for federal research grants. Further items relate to the assignment of the proper fringe rate for federal research grants. To mitigate future occurrences of possible incorrect ra...
Corrective Action Plan: The identified conditions relate to the proper application and calculation of indirect cost rates for federal research grants. Further items relate to the assignment of the proper fringe rate for federal research grants. To mitigate future occurrences of possible incorrect rates applied to such contracts, the College has strengthened its internal controls and oversight by reviewing and reperforming calculations. Timeline for Implementation of Corrective Action Plan: These corrective actions were implemented by spring 2025.
View Audit 357554 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 561902 (2024-003)
Significant Deficiency 2024
Planned Corrective Action: Monthly bank reconciliations and journal entries are completed by staff accountants and reviewed by the Chief Financial Officer. Historically, this process has not been documented as files are retained electronically and our accounting software, Resman, does not offer the ...
Planned Corrective Action: Monthly bank reconciliations and journal entries are completed by staff accountants and reviewed by the Chief Financial Officer. Historically, this process has not been documented as files are retained electronically and our accounting software, Resman, does not offer the functionality of in-system approvals. In 2025, we will implement a control to document this review process. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Actions: Fiscal year ending 12/31/25
Finding 561901 (2024-002)
Significant Deficiency 2024
management fees charged above the HUD-approved allowable limit. This overage was due to an administrative oversight in adjusting the prior year approve rate of 6.93% to 6.38%, the rate approved in 2024. Management has implemented an internal process to ensure that annual adjustments to management fe...
management fees charged above the HUD-approved allowable limit. This overage was due to an administrative oversight in adjusting the prior year approve rate of 6.93% to 6.38%, the rate approved in 2024. Management has implemented an internal process to ensure that annual adjustments to management fee rates are processed. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Actions: Fiscal year ending 12/31/25
Planned Corrective Action: Monthly bank reconciliations and journal entries are completed by staff accountants and reviewed by the Chief Financial Officer. Historically, this process has not been documented as files are retained electronically and our accounting software, Resman, does not offer the ...
Planned Corrective Action: Monthly bank reconciliations and journal entries are completed by staff accountants and reviewed by the Chief Financial Officer. Historically, this process has not been documented as files are retained electronically and our accounting software, Resman, does not offer the functionality of in‐system approvals. In 2025, we will implement a control to document this review process. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: Fiscal year ending 2025, we will implement a control to document this review process. Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Chief Financial Officer
Planned Corrective Action: Monthly bank reconciliations and journal entries are completed by staff accountants and reviewed by the Chief Financial Officer. Historically, this process has not been documented as files are retained electronically and our accounting software, Resman, does not offer the ...
Planned Corrective Action: Monthly bank reconciliations and journal entries are completed by staff accountants and reviewed by the Chief Financial Officer. Historically, this process has not been documented as files are retained electronically and our accounting software, Resman, does not offer the functionality of in-system approvals. In 2025, we will implement a control to document this review process. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: Fiscal year ending 2025, we will implement a control to document this review process. Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Chief Financial Officer
Planned Corrective Action: Monthly bank reconciliations and journal entries are completed by staff accountants and reviewed by the Chief Financial Officer. Historically, this process has not been documented as files are retained electronically and our accounting software, Resman, does not offer the ...
Planned Corrective Action: Monthly bank reconciliations and journal entries are completed by staff accountants and reviewed by the Chief Financial Officer. Historically, this process has not been documented as files are retained electronically and our accounting software, Resman, does not offer the functionality of in-system approvals. In 2025, we will implement a control to document this review process. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: Fiscal year ending 2025, we will implement a control to document this review process. Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Chief Financial Officer
Planned Corrective Action: Monthly bank reconciliations and journal entries are completed by staff accountants and reviewed by the Chief Financial Officer. Historically, this process has not been documented as files are retained electronically and our accounting software, Resman, does not offer the ...
Planned Corrective Action: Monthly bank reconciliations and journal entries are completed by staff accountants and reviewed by the Chief Financial Officer. Historically, this process has not been documented as files are retained electronically and our accounting software, Resman, does not offer the functionality of in-system approvals. In 2025, we will implement a control to document this review process. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: Fiscal year ending 2025, we will implement a control to document this review process.
As a corrective measure, BGCPR will take the following actions and will anticipate completing on June 30, 2025: a. Developing and enforcing a structured reporting calendar. b. Allocating dedicated resources to support audit preparation. c. Establishing internal checkpoints to monitor progress and en...
As a corrective measure, BGCPR will take the following actions and will anticipate completing on June 30, 2025: a. Developing and enforcing a structured reporting calendar. b. Allocating dedicated resources to support audit preparation. c. Establishing internal checkpoints to monitor progress and ensure accountability. d. Ensure future submissions meet the required deadlines.
As a corrective measure, BGCPR will take the following actions and will anticipate completing on June 30, 2025: a. Implement and maintain an automated accounting and financial records system to enable real-time oversight of the asset capitalization policy. b. Establish a robust internal control fram...
As a corrective measure, BGCPR will take the following actions and will anticipate completing on June 30, 2025: a. Implement and maintain an automated accounting and financial records system to enable real-time oversight of the asset capitalization policy. b. Establish a robust internal control framework including pre-approvals for equipment purchases and cross-validations of financial data. c. Periodic internal monitoring’s to ensure compliance and documentation.d. Update BGCPR’s fiscal management guidance to include a formal provision requiring the capitalization policy to be reviewed every three (3) years in compliance with the ensure compliance with federal regulation 2 CFR §200 regarding asset capitalization criteria. e. Conduct a training program for accounting and financial personnel.
As a corrective measure, BGCPR will take the following actions and will anticipate completing on June 30, 2025: a. Establish clear guidelines for the creation, storage, access, updating, and disposal of records. b. Define retention periods in accordance with legal requirements. c. Develop periodic m...
As a corrective measure, BGCPR will take the following actions and will anticipate completing on June 30, 2025: a. Establish clear guidelines for the creation, storage, access, updating, and disposal of records. b. Define retention periods in accordance with legal requirements. c. Develop periodic monitoring procedures to verify record completeness and compliance. d. Implement scheduled internal reviews and standardized checklists. e. Assign specific responsibilities to Human Resources personnel for policy enforcement.
Federal grants will be recorded in Paycom (our payroll software) showing hours worked on a specific grant (with staff clocking in/out based on time worked) rather than adjustments made to the GL.
Federal grants will be recorded in Paycom (our payroll software) showing hours worked on a specific grant (with staff clocking in/out based on time worked) rather than adjustments made to the GL.
2024-002 – Indirect Costs Auditor Description of Condition and Effect. During our testing of indirect cost rates we observed that overhead was included in the Institute's indirect cost rate reimbursement calculation for one out of the Institute's three indirect cost calculations (the general and adm...
2024-002 – Indirect Costs Auditor Description of Condition and Effect. During our testing of indirect cost rates we observed that overhead was included in the Institute's indirect cost rate reimbursement calculation for one out of the Institute's three indirect cost calculations (the general and administrative calculation). As a result of this condition, the Institute did not fully comply with the Uniform Guidance applicable to the above noted grants. Auditor Recommendation. We recommend that the Institute review its policies and procedures in regard to the review of the calculation of indirect costs reimbursement to ensure that it conforms with the approved indirect cost rate and all provisions of the indirect cost rate approved by the Institute's cognizant agency. Corrective Action. Altarum’s indirect rate agreement with the Federal government is a provisional rate agreement, meaning the rates and their bases are not yet finalized. Under FAR Subpart 42.7, Altarum has the flexibility to propose the rates, and their bases provided we comply with the FAR. The following FAR clauses address flexibility:  Indirect Cost Rates: Under FAR 42.703-1, companies must accumulate indirect costs in logical groupings and allocate them using a base that reflects the benefits accruing to cost objectives. This ensures fairness and consistency in cost allocation.  Flexibility: FAR Subpart 42.7 provides flexibility in cost allocation methods, particularly under FAR 42.705 (Final Indirect Cost Rates). This section allows companies to adjust indirect cost allocation methods in response to significant changes in business operations or other relevant circumstances.  Certification: The requirement for contractors to certify their indirect cost proposals is detailed in FAR 42.703-2 (Certificate of Indirect Costs). This ensures compliance with applicable regulations and establishes the validity of the cost proposals. In June 2024, Altarum submitted a certified indirect rate proposal utilizing the total cost input method, excluding subrecipients over $25,000, as the base for our general and administrative (G&A) cost pool. This base was chosen to reflect the benefits accruing to those cost objectives. The accompanying proposed rate Altarum submitted reflected this calculation. Our provisional G&A rate was approved at the percentage that included overhead in our G&A base. However, the narrative in our provisional nonprofit rate agreement did not accurately reflect our proposal, as it inadvertently included the term "total direct costs" when describing the base for the G&A rate. For the fiscal year 2024, Altarum incorporated overhead costs into the base of the associated general and administrative cost rate as certified in our proposal to the Federal government in June 2024. To address the discrepancy between the provisional rate agreement, our proposal, and our system, we sought guidance from our cognizant agent at US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). In discussions, Altarum was advised to update the allocation base as part of our next proposal package submission, June 2025. Additionally, we were advised that the reviewer from HHS will update the allocation base when finalizing the indirect cost rates for fiscal year 2024. Altarum will follow the advice of HHS and resolve the discrepancies in the rate agreement later this year. Responsible Person. Denise Sturm Anticipated Completion Date. 6/30/2025 – submissions to Federal government; final resolution subject to DHHS's review of our submissions.
View Audit 357424 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 561753 (2024-005)
Significant Deficiency 2024
Finding #2024-005 – Significant Deficiency and Other Noncompliance. Applicable federal program: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Direct Federal Funding, HIV Prevention Activities Non-Governmental Organizational Based, Assistance Listing #93.939, Contract #6NU62PS924649-03-03, Contract...
Finding #2024-005 – Significant Deficiency and Other Noncompliance. Applicable federal program: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Direct Federal Funding, HIV Prevention Activities Non-Governmental Organizational Based, Assistance Listing #93.939, Contract #6NU62PS924649-03-03, Contract year: 07/01/23 – 06/30/24, Contract #5NU62PS924649-04-00, Contract year: 07/01/24 – 06/30/25. Condition and context: During our testing of 40 client case files, we noted one HIV positive client where there was no documentation of declined referrals sent to Disease Intervention Specialists. Recommendation: Re-emphasize procedures to ensure proper retention of referral documentation. Planned corrective action: The HIV/Wellness program previously contracted an external health professional to review positive files for quality management. The program temporarily transitioned between health professionals to support the need for more frequent reviews. Steps missed by internal staff were identified but were not identified during the quality management transition as timely reviews were not conducted. Program leadership has taken action to review policies and procedures to include HIV positive client support timelines. An additional procedure has been added which requires faxing client forms to local health department using secure steps provided by the local health department. Faxed forms are placed in client file and will serve as proof of referral and date referred. An additional review of files for proper documentation has been added and will be performed by medical student interns. Responsible officer: Kelva Clay, CPO. Estimated completion date: Completed.
Finding 561752 (2024-004)
Significant Deficiency 2024
Finding #2024-004 – Significant Deficiency and Other Noncompliance. Applicable federal programs: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Direct Federal Funding, HIV Prevention Activities Non-Governmental Organizational Based, Assistance Listing #93.939, Contract #6NU62PS924649-03-03, Contrac...
Finding #2024-004 – Significant Deficiency and Other Noncompliance. Applicable federal programs: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Direct Federal Funding, HIV Prevention Activities Non-Governmental Organizational Based, Assistance Listing #93.939, Contract #6NU62PS924649-03-03, Contract year: 07/01/23 – 06/30/24, Contract #5NU62PS924649-04-00, Contract year: 07/01/24 – 06/30/25. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Direct Federal Funding, Cooperative Agreement to Support Navigators in Federally-Facilitated Exchanges, Assistance Listing #93.332, Contract #NAVCA210403-03-03, Contract year: 08/27/23 – 08/26/24, Contract #NAVCA240482-01-00, Contract year: 08/27/24 – 08/26/25. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Direct Federal Funding, Children’s Health Insurance Program, Assistance Listing #93.767, Contract #2Y2CMS331859-02-05, Contract year: 07/01/23 – 06/30/25. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Passed through Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse, Assistance Listing #93.959, Contract #HHS000539700204 YPI, Contract year: 09/01/23 – 08/31/24, Contract #HHS000539700204 YPS, Contract year: 09/01/23 – 08/31/24, Contract #HHS000539700204 YPU, Contract year: 09/01/23 – 08/31/24. Condition and context: During our testing of payroll, non-payroll and indirect cost pool transactions, we identified the following exceptions: Controls over allowable cost compliance – all major programs. In a sample of 59 non-payroll transactions tested for internal controls over compliance: One instance of annual advertising contract charged in full rather than establishing a prepaid expense for the eleven months after Civic Heart’s year-end of August 31, 2024. The applicable grant period is July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2025 and thus, only one month, or approximately $417, was outside the period of performance (AL #93.767 Children’s Health Insurance Program). One instance of $2,700 charged to wrong program. Allowable costs of the Navigator program were charged to Connecting Kids program due to coding to the wrong class code in the general ledger. (AL#93.767 Children’s Health Insurance Program (Connecting Kids). In a sample of 135 payroll transactions tested for internal controls over compliance: Four instances of errors in the amount of costs charged to class code due to a clerical error in the payroll allocation spreadsheet. (AL #93.959 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse and AL #93.939 HIV Prevention Activities Non-Governmental Organizational Based). Other non-compliance: AL #93.767 Children’s Health Insurance Program: In a sample of 40 payroll or vendor charges, one instance of non-compliance with allowable cost compliance ($417). AL #93.332 Cooperative Agreement to Support Navigators in Federally-Facilitated Exchanges: In a sample of 42 payroll or vendor charges, one instance of non-compliance with allowable cost compliance ($2,700). AL #93.939 HIV Prevention Activities Non-Governmental Organizational Based: In a sample of 40 payroll or vendor charges, two instances of non-compliance with allowable costs due to charge to the wrong program. Controls over period of performance – all major programs. In a sample of 56 vendor transactions and 4 pay periods with grant beginning or ending dates during the audit period, we found: 13 instances of charging vendor costs to the wrong grant period. One instance of charging payroll costs to the wrong grant period. Other non-compliance: AL #93.332 Cooperative Agreement to Support Navigators in Federally-Facilitated Exchanges: In a sample of 14 vendor charges tested, we found 4 exceptions for charging to the wrong grant period (approximately $3,120). AL #93.939 HIV Prevention Activities Non-Governmental Organizational Based. In a sample of 27 vendor charges tested, we found 4 exceptions for charging to the wrong grant period (approximately $480). In a sample of four pay periods tested, we found one exception for charging costs to the wrong grant period (approximately $5,350). AL# 93.959 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse. In a sample of 25 vendor charges tested, we found 5 exceptions for charging to the wrong grant period (approximately $660). Recommendation: Emphasize adherence to established policies and procedures to ensure maintenance of payroll spreadsheets and reviews of coding for all transactions. Planned corrective action: Adherence to established policies and procedures will be strengthened by providing additional training when onboarding accounting staff, as well as additional oversight to the disbursement and payroll process. New accounting staff will be more thoroughly trained on established policies and procedures, including accruals, proper financial statement period recognition, grant award period of performance, tracking of grant activities using class codes, and allowable cost requirements. In addition, the CFO will ensure sufficient time is dedicated to reconciling payroll spreadsheets, payroll allocations, period of performance, and payroll accruals. Salaries and wages charged to the grant are now based on actual work performed determined by hours submitted by employee and approved by the applicable supervisor; this new control should assist in mitigating posting errors related to incorrect grants and grant periods. Responsible officer: Angelica Castillo, CFO. Estimated completion date: June 30, 2025.
View Audit 357417 Questioned Costs: $1
« 1 108 109 111 112 417 »