Audit 340053

FA 2023-001 Strengthen Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.010 - Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Number: S010A210010-21A (Year: 2022), S010A220010 (Year 2023) Questioned Costs: $6,942 Repeat of Prior Year Finding: FA 2022-001 Description: The policies and procedures of the School District were insufficient to provide adequate internal controls over expenditures as it relates to the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program. Background: The Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies (Title I) program was authorized under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to help local educational agencies (LEAs) improve teaching and learning in high-poverty schools in particular for children failing or most at-risk of failing, to meet challenging State academic standards. LEAs may operate targeted assistance programs in which children who are failing or most at-risk of failing may be served or schoolwide programs in which all children in eligible schools may be served. Title I funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. Title I funds totaling $523,820 were expended and reported on the Talbot County Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2023. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Additionally, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that “costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity… (g) Be adequately documented…” Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.430 – Compensation-Personal Services prescribe standards for documentation of personnel expenses and state, in part, that “(a) … Costs for compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy… specific requirements…, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity’s laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i)…, [as follows:] (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity…” Condition: Three nonpersonal services expenditures were randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. The expenditures were reviewed to determine if internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. For one sampled expenditure in the amount of $31, adequate supporting documentation in the form of an invoice was not maintained. Additionally, three personal services expenditures were randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. One individually significant expenditure was also selected for testing. These expenditures were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were noted: • For all employees tested, supporting documentation was not maintained for additional payments totaling $6,194. • For two employees tested, specific administrative supplements were overpaid and underpaid by $717 and $500, respectively. Questioned Costs: Upon testing a sample of $1,275 in nonpersonal service expenditures, known questioned costs of $31 were identified for expenditures that were not supported by adequate documentation. Using the total nonpersonal services expenditures population of $74,447, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $1,810. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Additionally, upon testing a sample of $38,405 in personal services expenditures, known questioned costs of $6,611 were identified for expenditures not supported by adequate documentation. Using the total personal services expenditures population of $143,515 (excluding benefits payments), we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $24,705. Furthermore, known questioned costs identified for undocumented personal services payments associated with individually significant items tested totaled $300. Therefore, the known and likely questioned costs identified for all unallowable and/or undocumented payments throughout the sample and individually significant items tested totaled $6,942 and $26,815, respectively. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believes that this is due to change in management in the financial department. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance or ED guidance related to the Title I program. Failure to ensure that documentation exists to support the allowability of payments from the Title I fund may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to Title I program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures are supported by appropriate documentation. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District's purchasing and employee compensation policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.

FA 2023-001 Strengthen Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.010 - Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Number: S010A210010-21A (Year: 2022), S010A220010 (Year 2023) Questioned Costs: $6,942 Repeat of Prior Year Finding: FA 2022-001 Description: The policies and procedures of the School District were insufficient to provide adequate internal controls over expenditures as it relates to the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program. Background: The Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies (Title I) program was authorized under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to help local educational agencies (LEAs) improve teaching and learning in high-poverty schools in particular for children failing or most at-risk of failing, to meet challenging State academic standards. LEAs may operate targeted assistance programs in which children who are failing or most at-risk of failing may be served or schoolwide programs in which all children in eligible schools may be served. Title I funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. Title I funds totaling $523,820 were expended and reported on the Talbot County Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2023. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Additionally, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that “costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity… (g) Be adequately documented…” Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.430 – Compensation-Personal Services prescribe standards for documentation of personnel expenses and state, in part, that “(a) … Costs for compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy… specific requirements…, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity’s laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i)…, [as follows:] (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity…” Condition: Three nonpersonal services expenditures were randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. The expenditures were reviewed to determine if internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. For one sampled expenditure in the amount of $31, adequate supporting documentation in the form of an invoice was not maintained. Additionally, three personal services expenditures were randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. One individually significant expenditure was also selected for testing. These expenditures were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were noted: • For all employees tested, supporting documentation was not maintained for additional payments totaling $6,194. • For two employees tested, specific administrative supplements were overpaid and underpaid by $717 and $500, respectively. Questioned Costs: Upon testing a sample of $1,275 in nonpersonal service expenditures, known questioned costs of $31 were identified for expenditures that were not supported by adequate documentation. Using the total nonpersonal services expenditures population of $74,447, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $1,810. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Additionally, upon testing a sample of $38,405 in personal services expenditures, known questioned costs of $6,611 were identified for expenditures not supported by adequate documentation. Using the total personal services expenditures population of $143,515 (excluding benefits payments), we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $24,705. Furthermore, known questioned costs identified for undocumented personal services payments associated with individually significant items tested totaled $300. Therefore, the known and likely questioned costs identified for all unallowable and/or undocumented payments throughout the sample and individually significant items tested totaled $6,942 and $26,815, respectively. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believes that this is due to change in management in the financial department. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance or ED guidance related to the Title I program. Failure to ensure that documentation exists to support the allowability of payments from the Title I fund may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to Title I program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures are supported by appropriate documentation. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District's purchasing and employee compensation policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.

FA 2023-002 Improve Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education Assistance Listing Numbers and Titles: COVID-19 – 84.425D – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 – 84.425U – American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 – 84.425W – American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund – Homeless Children and Youth Federal Award Numbers: S425D210012 (Year: 2021), S425U210012 (Year: 2021), S425W210011 (Year: 2021) Questioned Costs: $98,807 Repeat of Prior Year Finding: FA 2022-002 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating to ensure that expenditures were appropriately documented to support allowability. Background: On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act was designed to mitigate the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in a variety of ways, including providing additional funding for local educational agencies (LEAs) navigating the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Provisions included in Title VIII of the CARES Act created the Education Stabilization Fund to provide financial resources to educational entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the coronavirus. The CARES Act allocated $30.75 billion, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act allocated an additional $81.9 billion, and the American Rescue Plan Act added $165.1 billion in funding to the Education Stabilization Fund. Multiple Education Stabilization Fund subprograms were created and allotted funding through the various COVID-19-related legislation. Of these programs, the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund was created to address the impact that COVID-19 has had, and continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the nation. ESSER funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. ESSER funds totaling $1,201,097 were expended and reported on the Talbot County School District’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2023. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that “costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity… (g) Be adequately documented…” Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.430 – Compensation-Personal Services prescribe standards for documentation of personnel expenses and state, in part, that “(a) … Costs for compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy… specific requirements…, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity’s laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i)…, [as follows:] (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity…” Condition: A sample of 12 nonpersonal services expenditures was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. In addition, two individually significant items were selected for testing. These expenditures were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were noted: • A purchase order was not maintained for two of the expenditures. • The check amount, invoice, and purchase requisition form for one expenditure did not agree. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS In addition, a sample of 23 employees was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These employees were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were noted: • Timesheets or other supporting documentation could not be provided for payments made to 15 employees. • Timesheets provided for 15 employees did not agree to amounts paid for the corresponding time period. • One employee received a salary increase that was not supported by a board-approved salary scale. Questioned Costs: Upon testing a sample of $34,392 in nonpersonal services expenditures, known questioned costs of $1,365 were identified. Using the total non-personal services expenditures population of $144,208, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $5,723. Additionally, upon testing a sample of $274,649 in personal services expenditures, known questioned costs of $97,442 were identified. Using the total personal services expenditures population of $864,482, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $306,706. Therefore, the known and likely questioned costs identified for unallowable payments totaled $98,807 and $312,429. The following Assistance Listing Numbers were affected by known and questioned costs: 84.425D and 84.425U. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believes that this is due to change in management in the financial department. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance or ED guidance related to the ESSER program. Failure to ensure that documentation exists to support the allowability of payments from the ESSER fund may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to ESSER program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that all expenditures are supported by appropriate documentation. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District’s purchasing and employee compensation policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.

FA 2023-002 Improve Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education Assistance Listing Numbers and Titles: COVID-19 – 84.425D – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 – 84.425U – American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 – 84.425W – American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund – Homeless Children and Youth Federal Award Numbers: S425D210012 (Year: 2021), S425U210012 (Year: 2021), S425W210011 (Year: 2021) Questioned Costs: $98,807 Repeat of Prior Year Finding: FA 2022-002 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating to ensure that expenditures were appropriately documented to support allowability. Background: On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act was designed to mitigate the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in a variety of ways, including providing additional funding for local educational agencies (LEAs) navigating the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Provisions included in Title VIII of the CARES Act created the Education Stabilization Fund to provide financial resources to educational entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the coronavirus. The CARES Act allocated $30.75 billion, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act allocated an additional $81.9 billion, and the American Rescue Plan Act added $165.1 billion in funding to the Education Stabilization Fund. Multiple Education Stabilization Fund subprograms were created and allotted funding through the various COVID-19-related legislation. Of these programs, the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund was created to address the impact that COVID-19 has had, and continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the nation. ESSER funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. ESSER funds totaling $1,201,097 were expended and reported on the Talbot County School District’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2023. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that “costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity… (g) Be adequately documented…” Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.430 – Compensation-Personal Services prescribe standards for documentation of personnel expenses and state, in part, that “(a) … Costs for compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy… specific requirements…, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity’s laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i)…, [as follows:] (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity…” Condition: A sample of 12 nonpersonal services expenditures was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. In addition, two individually significant items were selected for testing. These expenditures were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were noted: • A purchase order was not maintained for two of the expenditures. • The check amount, invoice, and purchase requisition form for one expenditure did not agree. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS In addition, a sample of 23 employees was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These employees were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were noted: • Timesheets or other supporting documentation could not be provided for payments made to 15 employees. • Timesheets provided for 15 employees did not agree to amounts paid for the corresponding time period. • One employee received a salary increase that was not supported by a board-approved salary scale. Questioned Costs: Upon testing a sample of $34,392 in nonpersonal services expenditures, known questioned costs of $1,365 were identified. Using the total non-personal services expenditures population of $144,208, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $5,723. Additionally, upon testing a sample of $274,649 in personal services expenditures, known questioned costs of $97,442 were identified. Using the total personal services expenditures population of $864,482, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $306,706. Therefore, the known and likely questioned costs identified for unallowable payments totaled $98,807 and $312,429. The following Assistance Listing Numbers were affected by known and questioned costs: 84.425D and 84.425U. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believes that this is due to change in management in the financial department. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance or ED guidance related to the ESSER program. Failure to ensure that documentation exists to support the allowability of payments from the ESSER fund may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to ESSER program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that all expenditures are supported by appropriate documentation. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District’s purchasing and employee compensation policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.

FA 2023-002 Improve Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education Assistance Listing Numbers and Titles: COVID-19 – 84.425D – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 – 84.425U – American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 – 84.425W – American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund – Homeless Children and Youth Federal Award Numbers: S425D210012 (Year: 2021), S425U210012 (Year: 2021), S425W210011 (Year: 2021) Questioned Costs: $98,807 Repeat of Prior Year Finding: FA 2022-002 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating to ensure that expenditures were appropriately documented to support allowability. Background: On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act was designed to mitigate the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in a variety of ways, including providing additional funding for local educational agencies (LEAs) navigating the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Provisions included in Title VIII of the CARES Act created the Education Stabilization Fund to provide financial resources to educational entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the coronavirus. The CARES Act allocated $30.75 billion, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act allocated an additional $81.9 billion, and the American Rescue Plan Act added $165.1 billion in funding to the Education Stabilization Fund. Multiple Education Stabilization Fund subprograms were created and allotted funding through the various COVID-19-related legislation. Of these programs, the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund was created to address the impact that COVID-19 has had, and continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the nation. ESSER funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. ESSER funds totaling $1,201,097 were expended and reported on the Talbot County School District’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2023. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that “costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity… (g) Be adequately documented…” Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.430 – Compensation-Personal Services prescribe standards for documentation of personnel expenses and state, in part, that “(a) … Costs for compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy… specific requirements…, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity’s laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i)…, [as follows:] (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity…” Condition: A sample of 12 nonpersonal services expenditures was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. In addition, two individually significant items were selected for testing. These expenditures were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were noted: • A purchase order was not maintained for two of the expenditures. • The check amount, invoice, and purchase requisition form for one expenditure did not agree. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS In addition, a sample of 23 employees was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These employees were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were noted: • Timesheets or other supporting documentation could not be provided for payments made to 15 employees. • Timesheets provided for 15 employees did not agree to amounts paid for the corresponding time period. • One employee received a salary increase that was not supported by a board-approved salary scale. Questioned Costs: Upon testing a sample of $34,392 in nonpersonal services expenditures, known questioned costs of $1,365 were identified. Using the total non-personal services expenditures population of $144,208, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $5,723. Additionally, upon testing a sample of $274,649 in personal services expenditures, known questioned costs of $97,442 were identified. Using the total personal services expenditures population of $864,482, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $306,706. Therefore, the known and likely questioned costs identified for unallowable payments totaled $98,807 and $312,429. The following Assistance Listing Numbers were affected by known and questioned costs: 84.425D and 84.425U. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believes that this is due to change in management in the financial department. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance or ED guidance related to the ESSER program. Failure to ensure that documentation exists to support the allowability of payments from the ESSER fund may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to ESSER program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that all expenditures are supported by appropriate documentation. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District’s purchasing and employee compensation policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.

FA 2023-003 Improve Controls over Cash Management Compliance Requirement: Cash Management Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 84.010 - Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Numbers: S010A210010-21A (Year: 2022), SO10A220010 (Year: 2023) Questioned Costs: None Identified Repeat of Prior Year Findings: FA 2022-003, FA 2021-001, FA 2020-001, FA 2019-001, FA 2018-001, FA 2017-002, FA 2016-001, FA 2015-002, FA 2014-003 Description: The School District made cash drawdowns in excess of immediate cash needs for the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program. Background Information: The School District may request Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program funds from the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) once per month. GaDOE requires the School District to submit DE-0147 – Requests for Reimbursement of Monthly Cash Disbursements through the Grants Accounting Online Reporting System to receive program funds. When a DE-0147 request is submitted and approved, the funds are typically disbursed to the School District through an electronic payment process the next week. The School District submitted DE-0147 requests to receive a total of $426,546 in Title I funds from GaDOE during the fiscal year under review. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.305(b) state that “For non-Federal entities other than states, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds…the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity.” In addition, the Uniform Guidance Section 200.302(b)(6) requires the entity to develop written cash management procedures. Further, as noted in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.511, management is responsible for implementing reported corrective action to findings from previous audits. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Condition: A review of all cash drawdowns and disbursements related to the Title I program was performed to determine if any excessive cash balances were maintained during the fiscal year under review. Cash balances in excess of program materiality were maintained for the Title I program for 273 days. Additionally, it was noted that the School District did not have appropriate internal controls in place over the cash drawdown process. Cause: In discussing this issue with the School District, they indicated that the lack of review of Federal grants resulted in excess cash drawdown request. Effect: The School District was not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance. In addition, the School District could potentially accrue an interest liability that would be owed back to the federal government. Furthermore, when the School District cannot meet the requirement to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds and disbursement of those funds, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance allow GaDOE to change the method by which the School District is transferred funds and delay the School District’s receipt of these funds. This may include a requirement by GaDOE to submit invoices prior to being reimbursed for program expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should establish procedures to accurately forecast the cash needs of the Title I program and minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from GaDOE and the disbursement of such funds by the School District. In addition, these procedures should be documented in writing in accordance with the Uniform Guidance Section 200.302(b)(6). Furthermore, management should develop and implement a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are followed. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.

FA 2023-003 Improve Controls over Cash Management Compliance Requirement: Cash Management Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 84.010 - Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Numbers: S010A210010-21A (Year: 2022), SO10A220010 (Year: 2023) Questioned Costs: None Identified Repeat of Prior Year Findings: FA 2022-003, FA 2021-001, FA 2020-001, FA 2019-001, FA 2018-001, FA 2017-002, FA 2016-001, FA 2015-002, FA 2014-003 Description: The School District made cash drawdowns in excess of immediate cash needs for the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program. Background Information: The School District may request Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program funds from the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) once per month. GaDOE requires the School District to submit DE-0147 – Requests for Reimbursement of Monthly Cash Disbursements through the Grants Accounting Online Reporting System to receive program funds. When a DE-0147 request is submitted and approved, the funds are typically disbursed to the School District through an electronic payment process the next week. The School District submitted DE-0147 requests to receive a total of $426,546 in Title I funds from GaDOE during the fiscal year under review. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.305(b) state that “For non-Federal entities other than states, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds…the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity.” In addition, the Uniform Guidance Section 200.302(b)(6) requires the entity to develop written cash management procedures. Further, as noted in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.511, management is responsible for implementing reported corrective action to findings from previous audits. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Condition: A review of all cash drawdowns and disbursements related to the Title I program was performed to determine if any excessive cash balances were maintained during the fiscal year under review. Cash balances in excess of program materiality were maintained for the Title I program for 273 days. Additionally, it was noted that the School District did not have appropriate internal controls in place over the cash drawdown process. Cause: In discussing this issue with the School District, they indicated that the lack of review of Federal grants resulted in excess cash drawdown request. Effect: The School District was not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance. In addition, the School District could potentially accrue an interest liability that would be owed back to the federal government. Furthermore, when the School District cannot meet the requirement to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds and disbursement of those funds, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance allow GaDOE to change the method by which the School District is transferred funds and delay the School District’s receipt of these funds. This may include a requirement by GaDOE to submit invoices prior to being reimbursed for program expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should establish procedures to accurately forecast the cash needs of the Title I program and minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from GaDOE and the disbursement of such funds by the School District. In addition, these procedures should be documented in writing in accordance with the Uniform Guidance Section 200.302(b)(6). Furthermore, management should develop and implement a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are followed. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.

FA 2023-004 Strengthen Controls over Financial Reporting Compliance Requirement: Reporting Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Number and Title: 84.010 - Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Numbers: SO10A210010-21A (Year: 2022), SO10A220010 (Year: 2023) Questioned Costs: $84,283 Repeat of Prior Year Finding: FA 2022-004, FA 2021-002, FA 2019-002 Description: The School District did not file accurate completion reports for the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program. Background Information: The Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) requires the School District to submit a completion report by October 30 after the 15-month period of performance associated with the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies (Title I) program ends. These completion reports are filed through the Grants Application section of the MyGaDOE webportal and reflect budgeted and actual expenditure information for the Title I program for the reporting period. If the total expenditures reflected on the completion report are more than the Title I program funds received by the School District for the grant period, a DE-0147 – Request for Reimbursement of Monthly Cash Disbursements will be automatically generated and the additional funds due to the School District will be disbursed appropriately. Conversely, if the total funds received for the grant period exceed the total expenditures reflected on the completion report, the Grants Application will prompt the School District to enter a check number for the required refund of excess funds drawn down. Therefore, it is imperative that completion reports are filed by the School District in an accurate and timely manner. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.302(a) state in part that “the non-Federal entity’s financial management systems must…be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions.” In addition, Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.302(b)(2) state in part that the non-Federal entity’s financial management systems must provide for “accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements.” Further, as noted in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.511, management is responsible for implementing reported corrective action to findings from previous audits. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Condition: A review of the School District’s accounting records and the completion reports related to the Title I-A, Improving Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged and Title I-A, School Improvement programs for the period ending September 30, 2023 revealed that the expenditures were over reported by $84,283. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs of $84,283 were identified for cash drawdowns in excess of reimbursable expenditures. Cause: In discussing this deficiency with the School District, they stated these issues were a result of turnover within the central office. Effect: The School District was not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance. Failure to accurately report federal award expenditures through the completion report process could lead to the filing of DE-0147 reimbursement requests with GaDOE that do not support actual expenditures. Therefore, the School District obtained more federal funding than they were eligible to receive. Additionally, this funding must be returned to the GaDOE. Recommendation: The School District should establish internal control procedures to ensure that completion reports submitted to GaDOE are supported by the accounting records and DE-0147 reimbursement requests are prepared based upon actual expenditures incurred. In addition, management should develop and implement a monitoring process to ensure that control procedures are being followed. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.

FA 2023-004 Strengthen Controls over Financial Reporting Compliance Requirement: Reporting Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Number and Title: 84.010 - Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Numbers: SO10A210010-21A (Year: 2022), SO10A220010 (Year: 2023) Questioned Costs: $84,283 Repeat of Prior Year Finding: FA 2022-004, FA 2021-002, FA 2019-002 Description: The School District did not file accurate completion reports for the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program. Background Information: The Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) requires the School District to submit a completion report by October 30 after the 15-month period of performance associated with the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies (Title I) program ends. These completion reports are filed through the Grants Application section of the MyGaDOE webportal and reflect budgeted and actual expenditure information for the Title I program for the reporting period. If the total expenditures reflected on the completion report are more than the Title I program funds received by the School District for the grant period, a DE-0147 – Request for Reimbursement of Monthly Cash Disbursements will be automatically generated and the additional funds due to the School District will be disbursed appropriately. Conversely, if the total funds received for the grant period exceed the total expenditures reflected on the completion report, the Grants Application will prompt the School District to enter a check number for the required refund of excess funds drawn down. Therefore, it is imperative that completion reports are filed by the School District in an accurate and timely manner. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.302(a) state in part that “the non-Federal entity’s financial management systems must…be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions.” In addition, Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.302(b)(2) state in part that the non-Federal entity’s financial management systems must provide for “accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements.” Further, as noted in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.511, management is responsible for implementing reported corrective action to findings from previous audits. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Condition: A review of the School District’s accounting records and the completion reports related to the Title I-A, Improving Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged and Title I-A, School Improvement programs for the period ending September 30, 2023 revealed that the expenditures were over reported by $84,283. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs of $84,283 were identified for cash drawdowns in excess of reimbursable expenditures. Cause: In discussing this deficiency with the School District, they stated these issues were a result of turnover within the central office. Effect: The School District was not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance. Failure to accurately report federal award expenditures through the completion report process could lead to the filing of DE-0147 reimbursement requests with GaDOE that do not support actual expenditures. Therefore, the School District obtained more federal funding than they were eligible to receive. Additionally, this funding must be returned to the GaDOE. Recommendation: The School District should establish internal control procedures to ensure that completion reports submitted to GaDOE are supported by the accounting records and DE-0147 reimbursement requests are prepared based upon actual expenditures incurred. In addition, management should develop and implement a monitoring process to ensure that control procedures are being followed. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.

FA 2023-001 Strengthen Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.010 - Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Number: S010A210010-21A (Year: 2022), S010A220010 (Year 2023) Questioned Costs: $6,942 Repeat of Prior Year Finding: FA 2022-001 Description: The policies and procedures of the School District were insufficient to provide adequate internal controls over expenditures as it relates to the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program. Background: The Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies (Title I) program was authorized under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to help local educational agencies (LEAs) improve teaching and learning in high-poverty schools in particular for children failing or most at-risk of failing, to meet challenging State academic standards. LEAs may operate targeted assistance programs in which children who are failing or most at-risk of failing may be served or schoolwide programs in which all children in eligible schools may be served. Title I funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. Title I funds totaling $523,820 were expended and reported on the Talbot County Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2023. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Additionally, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that “costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity… (g) Be adequately documented…” Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.430 – Compensation-Personal Services prescribe standards for documentation of personnel expenses and state, in part, that “(a) … Costs for compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy… specific requirements…, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity’s laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i)…, [as follows:] (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity…” Condition: Three nonpersonal services expenditures were randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. The expenditures were reviewed to determine if internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. For one sampled expenditure in the amount of $31, adequate supporting documentation in the form of an invoice was not maintained. Additionally, three personal services expenditures were randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. One individually significant expenditure was also selected for testing. These expenditures were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were noted: • For all employees tested, supporting documentation was not maintained for additional payments totaling $6,194. • For two employees tested, specific administrative supplements were overpaid and underpaid by $717 and $500, respectively. Questioned Costs: Upon testing a sample of $1,275 in nonpersonal service expenditures, known questioned costs of $31 were identified for expenditures that were not supported by adequate documentation. Using the total nonpersonal services expenditures population of $74,447, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $1,810. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Additionally, upon testing a sample of $38,405 in personal services expenditures, known questioned costs of $6,611 were identified for expenditures not supported by adequate documentation. Using the total personal services expenditures population of $143,515 (excluding benefits payments), we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $24,705. Furthermore, known questioned costs identified for undocumented personal services payments associated with individually significant items tested totaled $300. Therefore, the known and likely questioned costs identified for all unallowable and/or undocumented payments throughout the sample and individually significant items tested totaled $6,942 and $26,815, respectively. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believes that this is due to change in management in the financial department. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance or ED guidance related to the Title I program. Failure to ensure that documentation exists to support the allowability of payments from the Title I fund may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to Title I program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures are supported by appropriate documentation. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District's purchasing and employee compensation policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.

FA 2023-001 Strengthen Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.010 - Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Number: S010A210010-21A (Year: 2022), S010A220010 (Year 2023) Questioned Costs: $6,942 Repeat of Prior Year Finding: FA 2022-001 Description: The policies and procedures of the School District were insufficient to provide adequate internal controls over expenditures as it relates to the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program. Background: The Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies (Title I) program was authorized under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to help local educational agencies (LEAs) improve teaching and learning in high-poverty schools in particular for children failing or most at-risk of failing, to meet challenging State academic standards. LEAs may operate targeted assistance programs in which children who are failing or most at-risk of failing may be served or schoolwide programs in which all children in eligible schools may be served. Title I funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. Title I funds totaling $523,820 were expended and reported on the Talbot County Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2023. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Additionally, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that “costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity… (g) Be adequately documented…” Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.430 – Compensation-Personal Services prescribe standards for documentation of personnel expenses and state, in part, that “(a) … Costs for compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy… specific requirements…, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity’s laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i)…, [as follows:] (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity…” Condition: Three nonpersonal services expenditures were randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. The expenditures were reviewed to determine if internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. For one sampled expenditure in the amount of $31, adequate supporting documentation in the form of an invoice was not maintained. Additionally, three personal services expenditures were randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. One individually significant expenditure was also selected for testing. These expenditures were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were noted: • For all employees tested, supporting documentation was not maintained for additional payments totaling $6,194. • For two employees tested, specific administrative supplements were overpaid and underpaid by $717 and $500, respectively. Questioned Costs: Upon testing a sample of $1,275 in nonpersonal service expenditures, known questioned costs of $31 were identified for expenditures that were not supported by adequate documentation. Using the total nonpersonal services expenditures population of $74,447, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $1,810. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Additionally, upon testing a sample of $38,405 in personal services expenditures, known questioned costs of $6,611 were identified for expenditures not supported by adequate documentation. Using the total personal services expenditures population of $143,515 (excluding benefits payments), we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $24,705. Furthermore, known questioned costs identified for undocumented personal services payments associated with individually significant items tested totaled $300. Therefore, the known and likely questioned costs identified for all unallowable and/or undocumented payments throughout the sample and individually significant items tested totaled $6,942 and $26,815, respectively. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believes that this is due to change in management in the financial department. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance or ED guidance related to the Title I program. Failure to ensure that documentation exists to support the allowability of payments from the Title I fund may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to Title I program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that expenditures are supported by appropriate documentation. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District's purchasing and employee compensation policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.

FA 2023-002 Improve Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education Assistance Listing Numbers and Titles: COVID-19 – 84.425D – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 – 84.425U – American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 – 84.425W – American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund – Homeless Children and Youth Federal Award Numbers: S425D210012 (Year: 2021), S425U210012 (Year: 2021), S425W210011 (Year: 2021) Questioned Costs: $98,807 Repeat of Prior Year Finding: FA 2022-002 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating to ensure that expenditures were appropriately documented to support allowability. Background: On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act was designed to mitigate the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in a variety of ways, including providing additional funding for local educational agencies (LEAs) navigating the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Provisions included in Title VIII of the CARES Act created the Education Stabilization Fund to provide financial resources to educational entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the coronavirus. The CARES Act allocated $30.75 billion, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act allocated an additional $81.9 billion, and the American Rescue Plan Act added $165.1 billion in funding to the Education Stabilization Fund. Multiple Education Stabilization Fund subprograms were created and allotted funding through the various COVID-19-related legislation. Of these programs, the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund was created to address the impact that COVID-19 has had, and continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the nation. ESSER funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. ESSER funds totaling $1,201,097 were expended and reported on the Talbot County School District’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2023. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that “costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity… (g) Be adequately documented…” Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.430 – Compensation-Personal Services prescribe standards for documentation of personnel expenses and state, in part, that “(a) … Costs for compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy… specific requirements…, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity’s laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i)…, [as follows:] (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity…” Condition: A sample of 12 nonpersonal services expenditures was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. In addition, two individually significant items were selected for testing. These expenditures were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were noted: • A purchase order was not maintained for two of the expenditures. • The check amount, invoice, and purchase requisition form for one expenditure did not agree. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS In addition, a sample of 23 employees was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These employees were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were noted: • Timesheets or other supporting documentation could not be provided for payments made to 15 employees. • Timesheets provided for 15 employees did not agree to amounts paid for the corresponding time period. • One employee received a salary increase that was not supported by a board-approved salary scale. Questioned Costs: Upon testing a sample of $34,392 in nonpersonal services expenditures, known questioned costs of $1,365 were identified. Using the total non-personal services expenditures population of $144,208, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $5,723. Additionally, upon testing a sample of $274,649 in personal services expenditures, known questioned costs of $97,442 were identified. Using the total personal services expenditures population of $864,482, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $306,706. Therefore, the known and likely questioned costs identified for unallowable payments totaled $98,807 and $312,429. The following Assistance Listing Numbers were affected by known and questioned costs: 84.425D and 84.425U. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believes that this is due to change in management in the financial department. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance or ED guidance related to the ESSER program. Failure to ensure that documentation exists to support the allowability of payments from the ESSER fund may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to ESSER program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that all expenditures are supported by appropriate documentation. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District’s purchasing and employee compensation policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.

FA 2023-002 Improve Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education Assistance Listing Numbers and Titles: COVID-19 – 84.425D – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 – 84.425U – American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 – 84.425W – American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund – Homeless Children and Youth Federal Award Numbers: S425D210012 (Year: 2021), S425U210012 (Year: 2021), S425W210011 (Year: 2021) Questioned Costs: $98,807 Repeat of Prior Year Finding: FA 2022-002 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating to ensure that expenditures were appropriately documented to support allowability. Background: On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act was designed to mitigate the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in a variety of ways, including providing additional funding for local educational agencies (LEAs) navigating the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Provisions included in Title VIII of the CARES Act created the Education Stabilization Fund to provide financial resources to educational entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the coronavirus. The CARES Act allocated $30.75 billion, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act allocated an additional $81.9 billion, and the American Rescue Plan Act added $165.1 billion in funding to the Education Stabilization Fund. Multiple Education Stabilization Fund subprograms were created and allotted funding through the various COVID-19-related legislation. Of these programs, the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund was created to address the impact that COVID-19 has had, and continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the nation. ESSER funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. ESSER funds totaling $1,201,097 were expended and reported on the Talbot County School District’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2023. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that “costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity… (g) Be adequately documented…” Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.430 – Compensation-Personal Services prescribe standards for documentation of personnel expenses and state, in part, that “(a) … Costs for compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy… specific requirements…, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity’s laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i)…, [as follows:] (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity…” Condition: A sample of 12 nonpersonal services expenditures was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. In addition, two individually significant items were selected for testing. These expenditures were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were noted: • A purchase order was not maintained for two of the expenditures. • The check amount, invoice, and purchase requisition form for one expenditure did not agree. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS In addition, a sample of 23 employees was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These employees were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were noted: • Timesheets or other supporting documentation could not be provided for payments made to 15 employees. • Timesheets provided for 15 employees did not agree to amounts paid for the corresponding time period. • One employee received a salary increase that was not supported by a board-approved salary scale. Questioned Costs: Upon testing a sample of $34,392 in nonpersonal services expenditures, known questioned costs of $1,365 were identified. Using the total non-personal services expenditures population of $144,208, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $5,723. Additionally, upon testing a sample of $274,649 in personal services expenditures, known questioned costs of $97,442 were identified. Using the total personal services expenditures population of $864,482, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $306,706. Therefore, the known and likely questioned costs identified for unallowable payments totaled $98,807 and $312,429. The following Assistance Listing Numbers were affected by known and questioned costs: 84.425D and 84.425U. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believes that this is due to change in management in the financial department. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance or ED guidance related to the ESSER program. Failure to ensure that documentation exists to support the allowability of payments from the ESSER fund may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to ESSER program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that all expenditures are supported by appropriate documentation. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District’s purchasing and employee compensation policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.

FA 2023-002 Improve Controls over Expenditures Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education Assistance Listing Numbers and Titles: COVID-19 – 84.425D – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 – 84.425U – American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund COVID-19 – 84.425W – American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund – Homeless Children and Youth Federal Award Numbers: S425D210012 (Year: 2021), S425U210012 (Year: 2021), S425W210011 (Year: 2021) Questioned Costs: $98,807 Repeat of Prior Year Finding: FA 2022-002 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund program revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating to ensure that expenditures were appropriately documented to support allowability. Background: On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act was designed to mitigate the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in a variety of ways, including providing additional funding for local educational agencies (LEAs) navigating the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Provisions included in Title VIII of the CARES Act created the Education Stabilization Fund to provide financial resources to educational entities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the coronavirus. The CARES Act allocated $30.75 billion, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act allocated an additional $81.9 billion, and the American Rescue Plan Act added $165.1 billion in funding to the Education Stabilization Fund. Multiple Education Stabilization Fund subprograms were created and allotted funding through the various COVID-19-related legislation. Of these programs, the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund was created to address the impact that COVID-19 has had, and continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the nation. ESSER funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to LEAs and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. ESSER funds totaling $1,201,097 were expended and reported on the Talbot County School District’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2023. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.403 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs state that “costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items, (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity… (g) Be adequately documented…” Furthermore, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.430 – Compensation-Personal Services prescribe standards for documentation of personnel expenses and state, in part, that “(a) … Costs for compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy… specific requirements…, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity’s laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i)…, [as follows:] (i) Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity…” Condition: A sample of 12 nonpersonal services expenditures was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. In addition, two individually significant items were selected for testing. These expenditures were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were noted: • A purchase order was not maintained for two of the expenditures. • The check amount, invoice, and purchase requisition form for one expenditure did not agree. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS In addition, a sample of 23 employees was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These employees were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and applicable compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were noted: • Timesheets or other supporting documentation could not be provided for payments made to 15 employees. • Timesheets provided for 15 employees did not agree to amounts paid for the corresponding time period. • One employee received a salary increase that was not supported by a board-approved salary scale. Questioned Costs: Upon testing a sample of $34,392 in nonpersonal services expenditures, known questioned costs of $1,365 were identified. Using the total non-personal services expenditures population of $144,208, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $5,723. Additionally, upon testing a sample of $274,649 in personal services expenditures, known questioned costs of $97,442 were identified. Using the total personal services expenditures population of $864,482, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $306,706. Therefore, the known and likely questioned costs identified for unallowable payments totaled $98,807 and $312,429. The following Assistance Listing Numbers were affected by known and questioned costs: 84.425D and 84.425U. Cause: Per discussion with management, the School District believes that this is due to change in management in the financial department. Effect or Potential Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance or ED guidance related to the ESSER program. Failure to ensure that documentation exists to support the allowability of payments from the ESSER fund may expose the School District to unnecessary financial strains and shortages as GaDOE may require the School District to return funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should review current internal control procedures related to ESSER program expenditures. Where vulnerable, the School District should develop and/or modify its policies and procedures to ensure that all expenditures are supported by appropriate documentation. In addition, the School District should implement a monitoring process to ensure that all expenditures are compliant with the School District’s purchasing and employee compensation policies and procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.

FA 2023-003 Improve Controls over Cash Management Compliance Requirement: Cash Management Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 84.010 - Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Numbers: S010A210010-21A (Year: 2022), SO10A220010 (Year: 2023) Questioned Costs: None Identified Repeat of Prior Year Findings: FA 2022-003, FA 2021-001, FA 2020-001, FA 2019-001, FA 2018-001, FA 2017-002, FA 2016-001, FA 2015-002, FA 2014-003 Description: The School District made cash drawdowns in excess of immediate cash needs for the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program. Background Information: The School District may request Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program funds from the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) once per month. GaDOE requires the School District to submit DE-0147 – Requests for Reimbursement of Monthly Cash Disbursements through the Grants Accounting Online Reporting System to receive program funds. When a DE-0147 request is submitted and approved, the funds are typically disbursed to the School District through an electronic payment process the next week. The School District submitted DE-0147 requests to receive a total of $426,546 in Title I funds from GaDOE during the fiscal year under review. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.305(b) state that “For non-Federal entities other than states, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds…the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity.” In addition, the Uniform Guidance Section 200.302(b)(6) requires the entity to develop written cash management procedures. Further, as noted in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.511, management is responsible for implementing reported corrective action to findings from previous audits. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Condition: A review of all cash drawdowns and disbursements related to the Title I program was performed to determine if any excessive cash balances were maintained during the fiscal year under review. Cash balances in excess of program materiality were maintained for the Title I program for 273 days. Additionally, it was noted that the School District did not have appropriate internal controls in place over the cash drawdown process. Cause: In discussing this issue with the School District, they indicated that the lack of review of Federal grants resulted in excess cash drawdown request. Effect: The School District was not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance. In addition, the School District could potentially accrue an interest liability that would be owed back to the federal government. Furthermore, when the School District cannot meet the requirement to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds and disbursement of those funds, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance allow GaDOE to change the method by which the School District is transferred funds and delay the School District’s receipt of these funds. This may include a requirement by GaDOE to submit invoices prior to being reimbursed for program expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should establish procedures to accurately forecast the cash needs of the Title I program and minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from GaDOE and the disbursement of such funds by the School District. In addition, these procedures should be documented in writing in accordance with the Uniform Guidance Section 200.302(b)(6). Furthermore, management should develop and implement a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are followed. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.

FA 2023-003 Improve Controls over Cash Management Compliance Requirement: Cash Management Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 84.010 - Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Numbers: S010A210010-21A (Year: 2022), SO10A220010 (Year: 2023) Questioned Costs: None Identified Repeat of Prior Year Findings: FA 2022-003, FA 2021-001, FA 2020-001, FA 2019-001, FA 2018-001, FA 2017-002, FA 2016-001, FA 2015-002, FA 2014-003 Description: The School District made cash drawdowns in excess of immediate cash needs for the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program. Background Information: The School District may request Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program funds from the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) once per month. GaDOE requires the School District to submit DE-0147 – Requests for Reimbursement of Monthly Cash Disbursements through the Grants Accounting Online Reporting System to receive program funds. When a DE-0147 request is submitted and approved, the funds are typically disbursed to the School District through an electronic payment process the next week. The School District submitted DE-0147 requests to receive a total of $426,546 in Title I funds from GaDOE during the fiscal year under review. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.305(b) state that “For non-Federal entities other than states, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds…the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity.” In addition, the Uniform Guidance Section 200.302(b)(6) requires the entity to develop written cash management procedures. Further, as noted in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.511, management is responsible for implementing reported corrective action to findings from previous audits. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Condition: A review of all cash drawdowns and disbursements related to the Title I program was performed to determine if any excessive cash balances were maintained during the fiscal year under review. Cash balances in excess of program materiality were maintained for the Title I program for 273 days. Additionally, it was noted that the School District did not have appropriate internal controls in place over the cash drawdown process. Cause: In discussing this issue with the School District, they indicated that the lack of review of Federal grants resulted in excess cash drawdown request. Effect: The School District was not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance. In addition, the School District could potentially accrue an interest liability that would be owed back to the federal government. Furthermore, when the School District cannot meet the requirement to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds and disbursement of those funds, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance allow GaDOE to change the method by which the School District is transferred funds and delay the School District’s receipt of these funds. This may include a requirement by GaDOE to submit invoices prior to being reimbursed for program expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should establish procedures to accurately forecast the cash needs of the Title I program and minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from GaDOE and the disbursement of such funds by the School District. In addition, these procedures should be documented in writing in accordance with the Uniform Guidance Section 200.302(b)(6). Furthermore, management should develop and implement a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are followed. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.

FA 2023-004 Strengthen Controls over Financial Reporting Compliance Requirement: Reporting Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Number and Title: 84.010 - Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Numbers: SO10A210010-21A (Year: 2022), SO10A220010 (Year: 2023) Questioned Costs: $84,283 Repeat of Prior Year Finding: FA 2022-004, FA 2021-002, FA 2019-002 Description: The School District did not file accurate completion reports for the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program. Background Information: The Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) requires the School District to submit a completion report by October 30 after the 15-month period of performance associated with the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies (Title I) program ends. These completion reports are filed through the Grants Application section of the MyGaDOE webportal and reflect budgeted and actual expenditure information for the Title I program for the reporting period. If the total expenditures reflected on the completion report are more than the Title I program funds received by the School District for the grant period, a DE-0147 – Request for Reimbursement of Monthly Cash Disbursements will be automatically generated and the additional funds due to the School District will be disbursed appropriately. Conversely, if the total funds received for the grant period exceed the total expenditures reflected on the completion report, the Grants Application will prompt the School District to enter a check number for the required refund of excess funds drawn down. Therefore, it is imperative that completion reports are filed by the School District in an accurate and timely manner. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.302(a) state in part that “the non-Federal entity’s financial management systems must…be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions.” In addition, Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.302(b)(2) state in part that the non-Federal entity’s financial management systems must provide for “accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements.” Further, as noted in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.511, management is responsible for implementing reported corrective action to findings from previous audits. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Condition: A review of the School District’s accounting records and the completion reports related to the Title I-A, Improving Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged and Title I-A, School Improvement programs for the period ending September 30, 2023 revealed that the expenditures were over reported by $84,283. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs of $84,283 were identified for cash drawdowns in excess of reimbursable expenditures. Cause: In discussing this deficiency with the School District, they stated these issues were a result of turnover within the central office. Effect: The School District was not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance. Failure to accurately report federal award expenditures through the completion report process could lead to the filing of DE-0147 reimbursement requests with GaDOE that do not support actual expenditures. Therefore, the School District obtained more federal funding than they were eligible to receive. Additionally, this funding must be returned to the GaDOE. Recommendation: The School District should establish internal control procedures to ensure that completion reports submitted to GaDOE are supported by the accounting records and DE-0147 reimbursement requests are prepared based upon actual expenditures incurred. In addition, management should develop and implement a monitoring process to ensure that control procedures are being followed. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.

FA 2023-004 Strengthen Controls over Financial Reporting Compliance Requirement: Reporting Internal Control Impact: Material Weakness Compliance Impact: Material Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Number and Title: 84.010 - Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Award Numbers: SO10A210010-21A (Year: 2022), SO10A220010 (Year: 2023) Questioned Costs: $84,283 Repeat of Prior Year Finding: FA 2022-004, FA 2021-002, FA 2019-002 Description: The School District did not file accurate completion reports for the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program. Background Information: The Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) requires the School District to submit a completion report by October 30 after the 15-month period of performance associated with the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies (Title I) program ends. These completion reports are filed through the Grants Application section of the MyGaDOE webportal and reflect budgeted and actual expenditure information for the Title I program for the reporting period. If the total expenditures reflected on the completion report are more than the Title I program funds received by the School District for the grant period, a DE-0147 – Request for Reimbursement of Monthly Cash Disbursements will be automatically generated and the additional funds due to the School District will be disbursed appropriately. Conversely, if the total funds received for the grant period exceed the total expenditures reflected on the completion report, the Grants Application will prompt the School District to enter a check number for the required refund of excess funds drawn down. Therefore, it is imperative that completion reports are filed by the School District in an accurate and timely manner. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.302(a) state in part that “the non-Federal entity’s financial management systems must…be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions.” In addition, Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.302(b)(2) state in part that the non-Federal entity’s financial management systems must provide for “accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements.” Further, as noted in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.511, management is responsible for implementing reported corrective action to findings from previous audits. lll FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Condition: A review of the School District’s accounting records and the completion reports related to the Title I-A, Improving Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged and Title I-A, School Improvement programs for the period ending September 30, 2023 revealed that the expenditures were over reported by $84,283. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs of $84,283 were identified for cash drawdowns in excess of reimbursable expenditures. Cause: In discussing this deficiency with the School District, they stated these issues were a result of turnover within the central office. Effect: The School District was not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance. Failure to accurately report federal award expenditures through the completion report process could lead to the filing of DE-0147 reimbursement requests with GaDOE that do not support actual expenditures. Therefore, the School District obtained more federal funding than they were eligible to receive. Additionally, this funding must be returned to the GaDOE. Recommendation: The School District should establish internal control procedures to ensure that completion reports submitted to GaDOE are supported by the accounting records and DE-0147 reimbursement requests are prepared based upon actual expenditures incurred. In addition, management should develop and implement a monitoring process to ensure that control procedures are being followed. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.