Audit 349948

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$65.69M
Findings
14
Programs
20
Organization: University of St. Thomas (MN)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-03-28

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
539401 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
539402 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
539403 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
539404 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
539405 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
539406 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - L
539407 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - I
1115843 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
1115844 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
1115845 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
1115846 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
1115847 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
1115848 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - L
1115849 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - I

Contacts

Name Title Type
LVV9V64A8449 Sarah Ervin Auditee
6519626612 Daniel Persaud Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. The University has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The purpose of the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) is to presenta summary of those activities of University of St. Thomas that have been financed by the United States government (federal awards). Federal awards received directly from federalagencies are included in the Schedule, as are federal guaranteed loans disbursed by other sources. Additionally, all federal awards passed through from other entities have been included in the Schedule. The University is required to match certain grant agreements, as defined in the grants, and these matching amounts are not included in the Schedule. The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with requirements of 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the University, it is not intended to, and does not, present the consolidated financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of University of St. Thomas.
Title: FEDERAL AWARDS PROVIDED TO SUBRECIPIENTS Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. The University has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Of the federal expenditures presented on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards, the University of St. Thomas provided federal awards to subrecipients in other programs as follows: Assistance Amount Listing Provided to Federal Grantor/Program Title Number Subrecipients RCN-UBE: Training Undergraduate Biologists through Urban Agriculture 47.074 $ 3 Alternate Pathways to Excellence: Engineering a Transfer- Friendly Experience 47.076 8 Prepare Highly Effective Diverse and Culturally Relevant Educators through Residency Pathways 84.336S 760 Small Business Development Center Program Grant 59.037 65 A Digital and Open-Source Amplifier for Oocyte Ion Channel Measurements 93.853 2 Total Subawards $ 838
Title: FEDERAL PERKINS LOAN PROGRAM Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. The University has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The University had Federal Perkins Loans with continuing compliance requirements of $790 outstanding at June 30, 2023. During the fiscal year 2024, no new loans were made, resulting in total expenditures of federal awards for Perkins Loans of $790 for the year ended June 30, 2024. After considering loan receipts, cancelations, and assignments, respectively, the balance outstanding was $462 at June 30, 2024. The University had the following loan balances of the Federal Perkins Loan Program as of June 30, 2024: Loan Loans Balance Advanced Federal Perkins Loan Program (ALN #84.038) $ 462 $ -
Title: STUDENT FINANCIAL AID INSTITUTIONAL AND PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY METRICS Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. The University has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The Institution is in compliance with the following institutional and program eligibility requirements under the Higher Education Act of 1965 and Federal regulations under 34 CFR 668.23: * Correspondence courses the institution offers under 34 CFR 600.7(b) and (g) * Regular students that enroll in correspondence courses under 34 CFR 600.7(b) and (g) * Institution’s regular students that are incarcerated under 34 CFR 600.7(c) and (g) * Completion rates for confined or incarcerated individuals enrolled in non-degree programs at nonprofit institutions under 34 CFR 600.7(c)(3)(ii) and (g) * Institution’s regular students that lack a high school diploma or its equivalent under 34 CFR 600.7(d) and (g) * Completion rates for short-term programs under 34 CFR 668.8(f) and (g) * Placement rates for short-term programs under https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title- 34/subtitle-B/chapter-VI/part-668/subpart-A/section-668.8 34 CFR 668.8(e)(2)

Finding Details

2028 – 001 – National Student Loan Database System Reporting Federal Agency: United States Department of Education Federal Program Name: Student Financial Aid Assistance Listing Number: Student Financial Aid Cluster Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding:  Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance  Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309 requires that enrollment status changes for students be reported to NSLDS within 30 days or within 60 days if the student with the status change will be reported on a scheduled transmission within 60 days of the change in status. In addition, regulations require the status include an accurate effective date. Regulations require that an institution make necessary corrections and return the records within 10 days for any roster files that don’t pass the NSLDS enrollment reporting edits. Condition: During our testing, we noted 1 of 40 students enrollment status and enrollment effective date per institution's record did not match what was reported to NSLDS. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing, we noted the University did not have proper procedures in place to verify the reports sent to NSLDS are accurate. Cause: The University processes and controls did not ensure that student status changes were accurately reported to NSLDS. The effective date should be the student's last date of attendance and academically-related activity. Effect: The NSLDS system is not updated with the correct student information, which can cause a student to not properly enter the repayment period. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University review its reporting procedures to ensure the students' statuses are accurately reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Views of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2028 – 001 – National Student Loan Database System Reporting Federal Agency: United States Department of Education Federal Program Name: Student Financial Aid Assistance Listing Number: Student Financial Aid Cluster Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding:  Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance  Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309 requires that enrollment status changes for students be reported to NSLDS within 30 days or within 60 days if the student with the status change will be reported on a scheduled transmission within 60 days of the change in status. In addition, regulations require the status include an accurate effective date. Regulations require that an institution make necessary corrections and return the records within 10 days for any roster files that don’t pass the NSLDS enrollment reporting edits. Condition: During our testing, we noted 1 of 40 students enrollment status and enrollment effective date per institution's record did not match what was reported to NSLDS. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing, we noted the University did not have proper procedures in place to verify the reports sent to NSLDS are accurate. Cause: The University processes and controls did not ensure that student status changes were accurately reported to NSLDS. The effective date should be the student's last date of attendance and academically-related activity. Effect: The NSLDS system is not updated with the correct student information, which can cause a student to not properly enter the repayment period. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University review its reporting procedures to ensure the students' statuses are accurately reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Views of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2028 – 001 – National Student Loan Database System Reporting Federal Agency: United States Department of Education Federal Program Name: Student Financial Aid Assistance Listing Number: Student Financial Aid Cluster Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding:  Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance  Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309 requires that enrollment status changes for students be reported to NSLDS within 30 days or within 60 days if the student with the status change will be reported on a scheduled transmission within 60 days of the change in status. In addition, regulations require the status include an accurate effective date. Regulations require that an institution make necessary corrections and return the records within 10 days for any roster files that don’t pass the NSLDS enrollment reporting edits. Condition: During our testing, we noted 1 of 40 students enrollment status and enrollment effective date per institution's record did not match what was reported to NSLDS. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing, we noted the University did not have proper procedures in place to verify the reports sent to NSLDS are accurate. Cause: The University processes and controls did not ensure that student status changes were accurately reported to NSLDS. The effective date should be the student's last date of attendance and academically-related activity. Effect: The NSLDS system is not updated with the correct student information, which can cause a student to not properly enter the repayment period. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University review its reporting procedures to ensure the students' statuses are accurately reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Views of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2028 – 001 – National Student Loan Database System Reporting Federal Agency: United States Department of Education Federal Program Name: Student Financial Aid Assistance Listing Number: Student Financial Aid Cluster Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding:  Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance  Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309 requires that enrollment status changes for students be reported to NSLDS within 30 days or within 60 days if the student with the status change will be reported on a scheduled transmission within 60 days of the change in status. In addition, regulations require the status include an accurate effective date. Regulations require that an institution make necessary corrections and return the records within 10 days for any roster files that don’t pass the NSLDS enrollment reporting edits. Condition: During our testing, we noted 1 of 40 students enrollment status and enrollment effective date per institution's record did not match what was reported to NSLDS. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing, we noted the University did not have proper procedures in place to verify the reports sent to NSLDS are accurate. Cause: The University processes and controls did not ensure that student status changes were accurately reported to NSLDS. The effective date should be the student's last date of attendance and academically-related activity. Effect: The NSLDS system is not updated with the correct student information, which can cause a student to not properly enter the repayment period. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University review its reporting procedures to ensure the students' statuses are accurately reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Views of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2028 – 001 – National Student Loan Database System Reporting Federal Agency: United States Department of Education Federal Program Name: Student Financial Aid Assistance Listing Number: Student Financial Aid Cluster Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding:  Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance  Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309 requires that enrollment status changes for students be reported to NSLDS within 30 days or within 60 days if the student with the status change will be reported on a scheduled transmission within 60 days of the change in status. In addition, regulations require the status include an accurate effective date. Regulations require that an institution make necessary corrections and return the records within 10 days for any roster files that don’t pass the NSLDS enrollment reporting edits. Condition: During our testing, we noted 1 of 40 students enrollment status and enrollment effective date per institution's record did not match what was reported to NSLDS. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing, we noted the University did not have proper procedures in place to verify the reports sent to NSLDS are accurate. Cause: The University processes and controls did not ensure that student status changes were accurately reported to NSLDS. The effective date should be the student's last date of attendance and academically-related activity. Effect: The NSLDS system is not updated with the correct student information, which can cause a student to not properly enter the repayment period. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University review its reporting procedures to ensure the students' statuses are accurately reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Views of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024 – 002 – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (FFATA) Reporting Federal Agency: United States Department of Education Federal Program Name: Teacher Quality Partnership Program Assistance Listing Number: 84.336 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding:  Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance  Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 2 CFR Part 170, as required by the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006, states organizations which make subawards of federal funding with obligations of $25,000 or greater must complete FFATA reporting of executive compensation to the federal agency no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation was made. Condition: During our testing, the University reported that they had not completed the required FFATA reporting for any of the subawards made during the year ended June 30, 2024 nor subsequent to year end. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing, it was noted the University did not have proper procedures in place for ensuring completion of the FFATA reporting for subawards and sub awardee executive compensation as required in the federal fund notice of awards. Cause: UST was not aware of the timing of the FFATA reporting requirements and did not have a process in place to ensure that required reporting had been completed within the time allowed. Effect: By not completing the required FFATA reporting, the University is not in compliance with the terms of the award. This did not result in any disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University implements a process place to ensure the required reporting is completed in the timeline allowed by the granting agency and to complete any missed or late reporting as required. Views of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Education Federal Program Name: Teacher Quality Partnership Program Assistance Listing Number: 84.336 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding:  Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance  Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Under the Uniform Guidance, nonfederal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All nonprocurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. Condition: We tested five subrecipients paid over $25,000. One of the five tested did not have any documentation to support that the University verified the subrecipient was not suspended or debarred at the time of executing the subaward agreement. The University stated they completed this review however there was no documentation to support the completion of this step prior to entering into a covered transaction. Per review of the suspension and debarment list at the time of testing, we noted the subrecipient was neither suspended nor debarred. Questioned Costs: None Context: During testing, it was noted there was no documentation retained to ensure the SAM verification was done prior to executing the subaward agreement. In addition, there was no documentation of a second review to ensure the subrecipient was not suspended or debarred. Cause: The control system to prevent payment to a suspended and debarred vendor was not in place. Effect: The University could have entered into a covered transaction with a subrecipient who is suspended or debarred. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its existing policies to ensure it is up to date with federal regulations. We also recommend documenting the subrecipient was checked on the SAM.gov website prior to executing the subaward agreement. A secondary review should be performed prior to payment. This second review should be documented and retained to support the suspension and debarment requirements were followed and completed before entering into a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2028 – 001 – National Student Loan Database System Reporting Federal Agency: United States Department of Education Federal Program Name: Student Financial Aid Assistance Listing Number: Student Financial Aid Cluster Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding:  Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance  Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309 requires that enrollment status changes for students be reported to NSLDS within 30 days or within 60 days if the student with the status change will be reported on a scheduled transmission within 60 days of the change in status. In addition, regulations require the status include an accurate effective date. Regulations require that an institution make necessary corrections and return the records within 10 days for any roster files that don’t pass the NSLDS enrollment reporting edits. Condition: During our testing, we noted 1 of 40 students enrollment status and enrollment effective date per institution's record did not match what was reported to NSLDS. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing, we noted the University did not have proper procedures in place to verify the reports sent to NSLDS are accurate. Cause: The University processes and controls did not ensure that student status changes were accurately reported to NSLDS. The effective date should be the student's last date of attendance and academically-related activity. Effect: The NSLDS system is not updated with the correct student information, which can cause a student to not properly enter the repayment period. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University review its reporting procedures to ensure the students' statuses are accurately reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Views of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2028 – 001 – National Student Loan Database System Reporting Federal Agency: United States Department of Education Federal Program Name: Student Financial Aid Assistance Listing Number: Student Financial Aid Cluster Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding:  Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance  Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309 requires that enrollment status changes for students be reported to NSLDS within 30 days or within 60 days if the student with the status change will be reported on a scheduled transmission within 60 days of the change in status. In addition, regulations require the status include an accurate effective date. Regulations require that an institution make necessary corrections and return the records within 10 days for any roster files that don’t pass the NSLDS enrollment reporting edits. Condition: During our testing, we noted 1 of 40 students enrollment status and enrollment effective date per institution's record did not match what was reported to NSLDS. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing, we noted the University did not have proper procedures in place to verify the reports sent to NSLDS are accurate. Cause: The University processes and controls did not ensure that student status changes were accurately reported to NSLDS. The effective date should be the student's last date of attendance and academically-related activity. Effect: The NSLDS system is not updated with the correct student information, which can cause a student to not properly enter the repayment period. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University review its reporting procedures to ensure the students' statuses are accurately reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Views of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2028 – 001 – National Student Loan Database System Reporting Federal Agency: United States Department of Education Federal Program Name: Student Financial Aid Assistance Listing Number: Student Financial Aid Cluster Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding:  Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance  Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309 requires that enrollment status changes for students be reported to NSLDS within 30 days or within 60 days if the student with the status change will be reported on a scheduled transmission within 60 days of the change in status. In addition, regulations require the status include an accurate effective date. Regulations require that an institution make necessary corrections and return the records within 10 days for any roster files that don’t pass the NSLDS enrollment reporting edits. Condition: During our testing, we noted 1 of 40 students enrollment status and enrollment effective date per institution's record did not match what was reported to NSLDS. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing, we noted the University did not have proper procedures in place to verify the reports sent to NSLDS are accurate. Cause: The University processes and controls did not ensure that student status changes were accurately reported to NSLDS. The effective date should be the student's last date of attendance and academically-related activity. Effect: The NSLDS system is not updated with the correct student information, which can cause a student to not properly enter the repayment period. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University review its reporting procedures to ensure the students' statuses are accurately reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Views of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2028 – 001 – National Student Loan Database System Reporting Federal Agency: United States Department of Education Federal Program Name: Student Financial Aid Assistance Listing Number: Student Financial Aid Cluster Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding:  Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance  Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309 requires that enrollment status changes for students be reported to NSLDS within 30 days or within 60 days if the student with the status change will be reported on a scheduled transmission within 60 days of the change in status. In addition, regulations require the status include an accurate effective date. Regulations require that an institution make necessary corrections and return the records within 10 days for any roster files that don’t pass the NSLDS enrollment reporting edits. Condition: During our testing, we noted 1 of 40 students enrollment status and enrollment effective date per institution's record did not match what was reported to NSLDS. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing, we noted the University did not have proper procedures in place to verify the reports sent to NSLDS are accurate. Cause: The University processes and controls did not ensure that student status changes were accurately reported to NSLDS. The effective date should be the student's last date of attendance and academically-related activity. Effect: The NSLDS system is not updated with the correct student information, which can cause a student to not properly enter the repayment period. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University review its reporting procedures to ensure the students' statuses are accurately reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Views of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2028 – 001 – National Student Loan Database System Reporting Federal Agency: United States Department of Education Federal Program Name: Student Financial Aid Assistance Listing Number: Student Financial Aid Cluster Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding:  Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance  Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309 requires that enrollment status changes for students be reported to NSLDS within 30 days or within 60 days if the student with the status change will be reported on a scheduled transmission within 60 days of the change in status. In addition, regulations require the status include an accurate effective date. Regulations require that an institution make necessary corrections and return the records within 10 days for any roster files that don’t pass the NSLDS enrollment reporting edits. Condition: During our testing, we noted 1 of 40 students enrollment status and enrollment effective date per institution's record did not match what was reported to NSLDS. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing, we noted the University did not have proper procedures in place to verify the reports sent to NSLDS are accurate. Cause: The University processes and controls did not ensure that student status changes were accurately reported to NSLDS. The effective date should be the student's last date of attendance and academically-related activity. Effect: The NSLDS system is not updated with the correct student information, which can cause a student to not properly enter the repayment period. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University review its reporting procedures to ensure the students' statuses are accurately reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Views of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024 – 002 – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (FFATA) Reporting Federal Agency: United States Department of Education Federal Program Name: Teacher Quality Partnership Program Assistance Listing Number: 84.336 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding:  Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance  Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 2 CFR Part 170, as required by the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006, states organizations which make subawards of federal funding with obligations of $25,000 or greater must complete FFATA reporting of executive compensation to the federal agency no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation was made. Condition: During our testing, the University reported that they had not completed the required FFATA reporting for any of the subawards made during the year ended June 30, 2024 nor subsequent to year end. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing, it was noted the University did not have proper procedures in place for ensuring completion of the FFATA reporting for subawards and sub awardee executive compensation as required in the federal fund notice of awards. Cause: UST was not aware of the timing of the FFATA reporting requirements and did not have a process in place to ensure that required reporting had been completed within the time allowed. Effect: By not completing the required FFATA reporting, the University is not in compliance with the terms of the award. This did not result in any disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University implements a process place to ensure the required reporting is completed in the timeline allowed by the granting agency and to complete any missed or late reporting as required. Views of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: United States Department of Education Federal Program Name: Teacher Quality Partnership Program Assistance Listing Number: 84.336 Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding:  Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance  Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Under the Uniform Guidance, nonfederal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All nonprocurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. Condition: We tested five subrecipients paid over $25,000. One of the five tested did not have any documentation to support that the University verified the subrecipient was not suspended or debarred at the time of executing the subaward agreement. The University stated they completed this review however there was no documentation to support the completion of this step prior to entering into a covered transaction. Per review of the suspension and debarment list at the time of testing, we noted the subrecipient was neither suspended nor debarred. Questioned Costs: None Context: During testing, it was noted there was no documentation retained to ensure the SAM verification was done prior to executing the subaward agreement. In addition, there was no documentation of a second review to ensure the subrecipient was not suspended or debarred. Cause: The control system to prevent payment to a suspended and debarred vendor was not in place. Effect: The University could have entered into a covered transaction with a subrecipient who is suspended or debarred. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the University review its existing policies to ensure it is up to date with federal regulations. We also recommend documenting the subrecipient was checked on the SAM.gov website prior to executing the subaward agreement. A secondary review should be performed prior to payment. This second review should be documented and retained to support the suspension and debarment requirements were followed and completed before entering into a covered transaction. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.