Finding 628156 (2022-006)

Material Weakness
Requirement
H
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2022
Accepted
2023-08-07
Audit: 48532
Organization: City of Elkhart (IN)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The City charged costs to federal grant B-22-MC-18-0015 for services provided before the authorized period of performance, which began on July 1, 2022.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with 2 CFR 200.303 and 2 CFR 200.1, which mandate effective internal controls and adherence to the specified period of performance.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: The City should establish a robust internal control system with clear policies and procedures to ensure costs are only charged within the approved period of performance.

Finding Text

FINDING 2022-006 Subject: CDBG - Entitlement Grants Cluster - Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program: Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Assistance Listings Number: 14.218 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): B-22-MC-18-0015 Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context A non-federal entity may charge to the federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Grant number B-22-MC-18-0015 had a period of performance which began on July 1, 2022. Two of the four claims tested, or 50 percent, were for services provided prior to the beginning of the period of performance. The City did not receive approval from the federal awarding agency to charge costs incurred before the period of performance to the federal grant. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to grant B-22-MC-18-0015. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.1 states in part: ". . . Period of performance means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date, which may include one or more funded portions, or budget periods. Identification of the period of performance in the Federal award per ? 200.211(b)(5) does not commit the awarding agency to fund the award beyond the currently approved budget period. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the City. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, costs incurred before the beginning of the period of performance were charged to the grant. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City design and implement a proper system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that would provide segregation of duties to ensure costs charged to the grant occur within the proper period of performance. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Categories

Internal Control / Segregation of Duties Subrecipient Monitoring Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Material Weakness Period of Performance Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Special Tests & Provisions

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 51713 2022-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 51714 2022-006
    Material Weakness
  • 51715 2022-007
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 51716 2022-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 51717 2022-007
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 51718 2022-003
    Material Weakness
  • 51719 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 628155 2022-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 628157 2022-007
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 628158 2022-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 628159 2022-007
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 628160 2022-003
    Material Weakness
  • 628161 2022-004
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
66.458 Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds $6.76M
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $979,364
59.075 Shuttered Venue Operators Grant Program $526,042
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $263,589
97.036 Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (presidentially Declared Disasters) $109,638
20.106 Airport Improvement Program $92,000
14.401 Fair Housing Assistance Program_state and Local $49,082
16.034 Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Program $31,575
97.039 Hazard Mitigation Grant $30,610
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $29,207
20.600 State and Community Highway Safety $19,198
16.607 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program $8,138
16.922 Equitable Sharing Program $7,679