Finding 51717 (2022-007)

Material Weakness Repeat Finding
Requirement
L
Questioned Costs
-
Year
2022
Accepted
2023-08-07
Audit: 48532
Organization: City of Elkhart (IN)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: The City failed to submit accurate and timely financial and performance reports for CDBG grants, leading to a repeat finding of material weakness.
  • Impacted Requirements: Noncompliance with federal reporting standards, including the need for effective internal controls as outlined in 2 CFR 200.303 and 200.302(b).
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Management should establish a robust internal control system with clear policies and procedures to ensure accurate reporting and compliance with federal requirements.

Finding Text

FINDING 2022-007 Subject: CDBG - Entitlement Grants Cluster - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Programs: Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants, COVID-19 - Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Assistance Listings Number: 14.218 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): B-19-MC-18-0015, B-20-MC-20-0015, B-20-MW-18-0015, B-21-MC-18-0015, B-22-MC-18-0015 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2021-004. Condition and Context Financial Reporting For each CDBG award, the City is required to submit financial reports to Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The financial reports to be submitted are a quarterly CDBG Cash on Hand (PR29) report and an annual CDBG Financial Summary (PR26). The Community Development Specialist prepared the annual PR26 and quarterly PR29 reports without evidence of a review or an approval process to ensure accuracy of the reports submitted. During the audit period, there were three PR26 reports and six PR29 reports due. Four reports were selected for testing, two PR26 reports and two PR29 reports. One of the two PR26 reports was not supported by the City's records, and one of the two PR29 reports contained errors when reporting cash on hand. Performance Reporting The City is required to enter HUD 60002, Section 3 Summary Report, Economic Opportunities for Low- and Very Low-Income Persons report (Section 3) activities on the closeout screens in the Integrated Disbursement and Information System (IDIS), as well as within the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). The Section 3 report was not submitted on the closeout screens in the IDIS as part of the closeout process. The City did submit the Section 3 information within the CAPER; however, the Section 3 information was not supported by the City's records. The City was not able to provide documentation supporting the Section 3 information in the CAPER. Special Reporting for Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) Under the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (Pub. L. No. 109-282) (Transparency Act), recipients (i.e., direct recipients) of grants or cooperative agreements who make first tier subawards of $30,000 or more are required to register in the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) and report subaward data through the FSRS. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 28 CITY OF ELKHART SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) There were two subawards that required submission in the FSRS during the audit period. The due date for the information was August 31, 2022, and November 30, 2022, respectively. The information was completed and submitted by the City; however, there was no documentation of the review or oversight process in place to ensure the accuracy of the information submitted. (See Report PDF for Schedule.) The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in ?? 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the City. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, required reports were not accurate nor submitted timely. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City design and implement a proper system of internal control, including policies and procedures that would provide segregation of duties to ensure required reports are submitted timely and accurately. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Categories

Internal Control / Segregation of Duties Material Weakness Reporting Matching / Level of Effort / Earmarking Special Tests & Provisions Subrecipient Monitoring

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 51713 2022-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 51714 2022-006
    Material Weakness
  • 51715 2022-007
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 51716 2022-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 51718 2022-003
    Material Weakness
  • 51719 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 628155 2022-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 628156 2022-006
    Material Weakness
  • 628157 2022-007
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 628158 2022-005
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 628159 2022-007
    Material Weakness Repeat
  • 628160 2022-003
    Material Weakness
  • 628161 2022-004
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
66.458 Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds $6.76M
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $979,364
59.075 Shuttered Venue Operators Grant Program $526,042
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $263,589
97.036 Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (presidentially Declared Disasters) $109,638
20.106 Airport Improvement Program $92,000
14.401 Fair Housing Assistance Program_state and Local $49,082
16.034 Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Program $31,575
97.039 Hazard Mitigation Grant $30,610
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $29,207
20.600 State and Community Highway Safety $19,198
16.607 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program $8,138
16.922 Equitable Sharing Program $7,679