Finding 32036 (2022-006)

Material Weakness
Requirement
B
Questioned Costs
$1
Year
2022
Accepted
2023-05-29
Audit: 37231
Organization: City of Ashland (KY)

AI Summary

  • Core Issue: Several disbursements for the Housing Choice Voucher Program lacked required finance department approval, leading to discrepancies in check amounts and bank reconciliations.
  • Impacted Requirements: Compliance with internal controls for allowable costs was compromised, increasing the risk of incorrect payments.
  • Recommended Follow-Up: Implement procedures to ensure checks match the register before mailing, document direct deposit changes properly, and consider investing in better printing equipment.

Finding Text

2022-006 FEDERAL COMPLIANCE - DISBURSEMENTS Federal Program Name: Housing Choice Voucher Program Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 14.871 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs Criteria: The City?s internal controls require that all disbursements be approved by the finance department prior to payment and that bank reconciliations be performed on all accounts. Condition: During our audit, we noted several check runs for the Section 8 program that did not include the finance department?s approval for payment. Additionally, we noted four checks that cleared for amounts other than the amount included on the check register, including two checks whose payee did not agree to the register, a check that was issued twice, and other checks that did not appear on the register. These errors caused increased difficulty in reconciling the bank statements in a timely manner. Additionally, we noted one instance where the direct deposit information for one landlord was entered incorrectly, which resulted in a payment of approximately $2,000 being sent to the wrong bank account. Cause: According to the PHA director, these differences were caused by the check registers being printed by program instead of check number. Therefore, the payment amount for several tenants for a certain check were listed in a separate section. Other errors were due to misfeeds in the check printer. Based on discussions with City management, the direct deposit error was a result of taking the change over the phone and not obtaining documentation of the correct checking account number. Effect and Questioned Costs: Reduced effectiveness of internal controls with the possibility of incorrect payments being processed. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the PHA implement procedures to ensure that checks written agree to the check register prior to mailing and the finance department approve all Section 8 check runs. These procedures should include printing the check register by check number and comparing the printed checks to the register prior to mailing. If any differences are noted due to misfeeds in the check printer, the register should be updated to reflect correct information. Furthermore, an updated check register should be provided to the finance department with a memorandum documenting the changes. The City may consider investing in printing equipment that allows check numbers to be printed on the checks instead of utilizing preprinted checks. Additionally, we recommend that all direct deposit changes be appropriately documented (i.e. cancelled check, deposit ticket, completed direct deposit form, etc.) from the landlord and be reviewed prior to processing the first payment. Management?s Response: Our agency is now printing check registers by check number which will alleviate the appearance of incorrect check amounts. We will be comparing checks to register prior to sending to finance for approval. Our staff will continue to confirm account numbers by using the direct deposit forms and canceled checks when available. We have started contacting finance prior to processing any Hold Harmless requests to ensure the original check hasn't cleared the bank before requesting a duplicate check.

Corrective Action Plan

Our agency is now printing check registers by check number which will alleviate the appearance of incorrect check amounts. We will be comparing checks to register prior to sending to finance for approval. Our staff will continue to confirm account numbers by using the direct deposit forms and canceled checks when available. We have started contacting finance prior to processing any Hold Harmless requests to ensure the original check hasn't cleared the bank before requesting a duplicate check.

Categories

Questioned Costs HUD Housing Programs Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Equipment & Real Property Management Internal Control / Segregation of Duties

Other Findings in this Audit

  • 32031 2022-001
    Material Weakness
  • 32032 2022-002
    Material Weakness
  • 32033 2022-003
    Material Weakness
  • 32034 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 32035 2022-005
    Material Weakness
  • 32037 2022-007
    Material Weakness
  • 32038 2022-008
    Material Weakness
  • 608473 2022-001
    Material Weakness
  • 608474 2022-002
    Material Weakness
  • 608475 2022-003
    Material Weakness
  • 608476 2022-004
    Material Weakness
  • 608477 2022-005
    Material Weakness
  • 608478 2022-006
    Material Weakness
  • 608479 2022-007
    Material Weakness
  • 608480 2022-008
    Material Weakness

Programs in Audit

ALN Program Name Expenditures
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $3.54M
20.507 Federal Transit_formula Grants $974,424
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $315,263
97.036 Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (presidentially Declared Disasters) $59,522
95.001 High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas Program $48,379
20.616 National Priority Safety Programs $520